United States securities and exchange commission logo




                                                                                
                             May 15, 2023

       Scott Bennett
       Partner
       Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
       825 8th Avenue
       New York, NY 10019

                                                        Re: GasLog Partners LP
                                                            Schedule 13E-3 
filed May 5, 2023
                                                            File No. 005-88154

       Dear Scott Bennett:

              We have reviewed your filing and have the following comments. In 
some of our
       comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better 
understand your
       disclosure.

               Please respond to these comments by providing the requested 
information or advise us as
       soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our 
comments apply to your facts
       and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

               After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have 
additional comments.
       All defined terms in the letter have the same meaning as in your proxy 
statement.

       Schedule 13E-3 filed May 5, 2023

       General, page 1

   1.                                                   Fill in the blanks 
throughout the proxy statement. Information that is subject to change,
                                                        such as the percentage 
of shares owned by the rolling shareholders, may be bracketed to
                                                        indicate that it is 
preliminary.
       Summary Term Sheet, page 1

   2.                                                   We note your disclosure 
that    persons who acquired Common Units with the prior
                                                        approval of the 
Partnership Board    are not subject to the Cutback and that Cobas Asset
                                                        Management SGIIC SA (   
Cobas   ) beneficially owns more than 4.9% of the Common
                                                        Units. Disclose whether 
Cobas is subject to the Cutback.
       Recommendation of the Conflicts Committee and the Partnership Board; 
Reasons for
       Recommending Approval of the Merger Proposal, page 58
 Scott Bennett
FirstName  LastNameScott Bennett
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Comapany
May        NameCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
     15, 2023
May 15,
Page  2 2023 Page 2
FirstName LastName

3.       We note the disclosure that    Evercore   s opinion should not be 
construed as creating any
         fiduciary duty on Evercore   s part to any party       Please delete 
this language in the proxy
         statement. Alternatively, please explain any potential sources of 
fiduciary duty and the
         parties to whom such duties may be owed, such that such disclaimers of 
fiduciary duty
         would be appropriate.
Opinion of the Financial Advisor to the Conflicts Committee, page 64

4.       We note that Evercore was provided with appraisals of the 
Partnership's charter-free
         vessels prepared by certain third parties and that Evercore used these 
appraisals in
         conducting its fairness analyses. It appears that these appraisals are 
"reports, opinions or
         appraisals" encompassed within the meaning of Item 9 of Schedule 13E-3 
and Item 1015
         of Regulation M-A. Please provide the disclosure about the appraisals 
and the party that
         prepared them required by Item 1015, and file the appraisals as 
exhibits to the Schedule
         13E-3.
5.       Refer to the following statement on page 67 of the disclosure 
document: "The following
         summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of the 
analyses
         performed by Evercore." While a summary is necessarily an abbreviated 
version, please
         revise to avoid implying it is not "complete." Pursuant to Item 
1015(b)(6), the summary
         must describe the material analyses and conclusions of the financial 
advisor in
         considerable detail. Please revise. Please make similar changes to the 
following
         statement on page 73: "The foregoing summary of certain material 
financial analyses
         does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data 
presented by
         Evercore."
6.       Refer to the following statement at the top of page 74: "Evercore 
prepared these analyses
         solely for the information and benefit of the Conflicts Committee and 
for the purpose of
         providing an opinion to the Conflicts Committee as to whether the 
Consideration to be
         received by the Unaffiliated Unitholders in the Merger is fair, from a 
financial point of
         view, to the Partnership and the Unaffiliated Unitholders." Please 
delete the reference to
         "solely" in the preceding sentence.
Position of Parent, the General Partner, Merger Sub, the Conflicts Committee 
and the Partnership
Board as to the Fairness of the Merger, page 80

7.       We note your disclosure that "Parent, acting on its own behalf and on 
behalf of Merger
         Sub ... expressly adopts as its own" the "analysis, discussion and 
resulting conclusions" of
         the Conflicts Committee and the Partnership Board in determining that 
"the Merger is
         substantively and procedurally fair to the Unaffiliated Unitholders." 
If Parent seeks to
         rely on the Evercore analyses and presentations to support its finding 
of fairness to
         Unaffiliated Unitholders, please revise to specifically adopt those 
analyses and
         conclusions, or expand to describe how Parent itself considered them.
Purpose of Parent and Reasons for the Merger, page 81
 Scott Bennett
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
May 15, 2023
Page 3

8.       We note your disclosure that Parent and the Parent Board have 
undertaken to pursue the
         Merger at this time for the reasons described above,    i.e., for the 
same reasons that they
         are pursuing the Merger more generally. Please state with specificity 
why Parent and the
         Parent Board determined to pursue the Merger now as opposed to at any 
other time. See
         Item 1013(c) of Regulation M-A.
9.       We note your disclosure that the Merger would put    Parent in 
position to potentially
         achieve additional synergies in the event that the Preference Units 
(which will continue to
         trade on the NYSE immediately following completion of the Merger) are 
delisted in the
         future.    Provide the information required by Item 1006(c) of 
Regulation M-A, including
         whether Parent is considering delisting the Preference Units from the 
NYSE subsequent to
         the going private transaction.
Financing of the Merger, page 84

10.      Disclose any alternative financing arrangements or alternative 
financing plans in the event
         the plans with DNB fall through. If no such arrangements exist, please 
revise to so state.
         Refer to Item 1007(b) of Regulation M-A.
Unit Ownership, page 108

11.      Please state the aggregate number and percentage of subject securities 
that are beneficially
         owned by each person specified in Instruction C to Schedule 13E-3 for 
each filing person
         of the Schedule 13E-3, such as Anthony Papadimitriou. See Item 1008(a) 
of Regulation
         M-A.
        We remind you that the filing persons are responsible for the accuracy 
and adequacy of
their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of 
action by the staff.

      Please direct any questions to Christina Chalk at (202) 551-3263 or Blake 
Grady at (202)
551-8573.



FirstName LastNameScott Bennett                                Sincerely,
Comapany NameCravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
                                                               Division of 
Corporation Finance
May 15, 2023 Page 3                                            Office of 
Mergers & Acquisitions
FirstName LastName