UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)
☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2021


☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-35000

Walker & Dunlop, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		80-0629925
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1200E

Bethesda, Maryland 20814

(301) 215-5500

(Address of principal executive offices and registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share	WD	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☒

Smaller Reporting Company ☐

Accelerated Filer ☐

Emerging Growth Company ☐

Non-accelerated Filer ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of July 29, 2021, there were 31,821,841 total shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
Form 10-Q
INDEX


		Page

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	49

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	50

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	50

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	50

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	52

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	52

Item 5.	Other Information	52

Item 6.	Exhibits	53

	Signatures	54

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


		June 30, 2021	December 31, 2020
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326,518	$	321,097
Restricted cash		15,842		19,432
Pledged securities, at fair value		146,548		137,236
Loans held for sale, at fair value		1,718,444		2,449,198
Loans held for investment, net		272,033		360,402
Mortgage servicing rights		915,519		862,813
Goodwill and other intangible assets		268,018		250,838
Derivative assets		36,751		49,786
Receivables, net		80,196		65,735
Other assets		163,252		134,438
Total assets	$	3,943,121	$	4,650,975

Liabilities
Warehouse notes payable	$	1,823,982	$	2,517,156
Note payable		290,498		291,593
Allowance for risk-sharing obligations		60,329		75,313
Guaranty obligation, net		50,369		52,306
Derivative liabilities		30,411		5,066
Other liabilities		394,037		513,319
Total liabilities	$	2,649,626	$	3,454,753

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock (authorized 50,000; none issued)	$	—	$	—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized 200,000 shares; issued and outstanding 31,034 shares at June 30, 2021 and 30,678 shares at December 31, 2020)		310		307
Additional paid-in capital ("APIC")		255,676		241,004
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI")		2,578		1,968
Retained earnings		1,034,931		952,943
Total stockholders’ equity	$	1,293,495	$	1,196,222
Commitments and contingencies (NOTES 2 and 9)		—		—
Total liabilities and equity	$	3,943,121	$	4,650,975

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2021		2020		2021		2020
Revenues
Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net	$	107,472	$	77,907	$	183,351	$	154,280
Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net		61,849		90,369		119,784		158,369
Servicing fees		69,052		56,862		135,030		112,296
Property sales broker fees		22,454		3,561		31,496		13,173
Net warehouse interest income		4,630		9,401		9,185		14,896
Escrow earnings and other interest income		1,823		2,671		3,940		13,414
Other revenues		14,131		12,054		22,913		20,554
Total revenues	$	281,411	$	252,825	$	505,699	$	486,982

Expenses
Personnel	$	141,421	$	106,920	$	237,636	$	196,445
Amortization and depreciation		48,510		42,317		95,381		82,079
Provision (benefit) for credit losses		(4,326)		4,903		(15,646)		28,546
Interest expense on corporate debt		1,760		2,078		3,525		4,938
Other operating expenses		19,748		13,069		37,335		31,159
Total expenses	$	207,113	$	169,287	$	358,231	$	343,167
Income from operations	$	74,298	$	83,538	$	147,468	$	143,815
Income tax expense		18,240		21,479		33,358		34,151
Net income before noncontrolling interests	$	56,058	$	62,059	$	114,110	$	109,664
Less: net loss from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		(224)
Walker & Dunlop net income	$	56,058	$	62,059	$	114,110	$	109,888
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on pledged available-for-sale securities, net of taxes		768		1,430		610		(487)
Walker & Dunlop comprehensive income	$	56,826	$	63,489	$	114,720	$	109,401

Basic earnings per share (NOTE 10)	$	1.75	$	1.98	$	3.57	$	3.52
Diluted earnings per share (NOTE 10)	$	1.73	$	1.95	$	3.52	$	3.44

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding		31,019		30,352		30,922		30,288
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		31,370		30,860		31,322		30,960

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021
	Common Stock							Retained		Total Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		APIC		AOCI		Earnings		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2020	30,678	$	307	$	241,004	$	1,968	$	952,943	$	1,196,222
Walker & Dunlop net income	—		—		—		—		58,052		58,052
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—		(158)		—		(158)
Stock-based compensation - equity classified	—		—		7,836		—		—		7,836
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity compensation plans	430		4		12,602		—		—		12,606
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(131)		(1)		(13,373)		—		—		(13,374)
Cash dividends paid ($0.50 per common share)	—		—		—		—		(16,052)		(16,052)
Balance at March 31, 2021	30,977	$	310	$	248,069	$	1,810	$	994,943	$	1,245,132
Walker & Dunlop net income	—		—		—		—		56,058		56,058
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—		768		—		768
Stock-based compensation - equity classified	—		—		7,892		—		—		7,892
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity compensation plans	64		1		530		—		—		531
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(7)		(1)		(815)		—		—		(816)
Cash dividends paid ($0.50 per common share)	—		—		—		—		(16,070)		(16,070)
Balance at June 30, 2021	31,034	$	310	$	255,676	$	2,578	$	1,034,931	$	1,293,495


	For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020
		Stockholders' Equity
	Common Stock							Retained		Noncontrolling		Total
	Shares	Amount		APIC		AOCI		Earnings		Interests		Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019	30,035	$	300	$	237,877	$	737	$	796,775	$	6,596	$	1,042,285
Cumulative-effect adjustment for adoption of ASU 2016-13, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(23,678)		—		(23,678)
Walker & Dunlop net income	—		—		—		—		47,829		—		47,829
Net loss from noncontrolling interests	—		—		—		—		—		(224)		(224)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests											675		675
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—		(1,918)		—		—		(1,918)
Stock-based compensation - equity classified	—		—		5,061		—		—		—		5,061
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity compensation plans	675		7		11,362		—		—		—		11,369
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(380)		(4)		(18,293)		—		(8,440)		—		(26,737)
Cash dividends paid ($0.36 per common share)	—		—		—		—		(11,347)		—		(11,347)
Balance at March 31, 2020	30,330	$	303	$	236,007	$	(1,181)	$	801,139	$	7,047	$	1,043,315
Walker & Dunlop net income	—		—		—		—		62,059		—		62,059
Purchase of noncontrolling interests	—		—		(3,295)		—		—		(7,047)		(10,342)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—		1,430		—		—		1,430
Stock-based compensation - equity classified	—		—		5,592		—		—		—		5,592
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity compensation plans	50		1		195		—		—		—		196
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(11)		—		(405)		—		—		—		(405)
Cash dividends paid ($0.36 per common share)	—		—		—		—		(11,294)		—		(11,294)
Balance at June 30, 2020	30,369	$	304	$	238,094	$	249	$	851,904	$	—	$	1,090,551

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2021		2020
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income before noncontrolling interests	$	114,110	$	109,664
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Gains attributable to the fair value of future servicing rights, net of guaranty obligation		(119,784)		(158,369)
Change in the fair value of premiums and origination fees		9,047		(25,459)
Amortization and depreciation		95,381		82,079
Provision (benefit) for credit losses		(15,646)		28,546
Originations of loans held for sale		(7,293,128)		(10,281,562)
Proceeds from transfers of loans held for sale		8,024,903		9,381,412
Other operating activities, net		(55,541)		41,046
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	759,342	$	(822,643)

Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures	$	(3,800)	$	(1,539)
Purchases of equity-method investments		(3,248)		(850)
Purchases of pledged available-for-sale ("AFS") securities		(2,000)		(14,155)
Proceeds from prepayment and sale of pledged AFS securities		22,092		4,739
Investments in joint ventures		(38,805)		(17,160)
Distributions from joint ventures		22,113		10,690
Acquisitions, net of cash received		(10,507)		(46,784)
Originations of loans held for investment		(116,087)		—
Principal collected on loans held for investment		205,653		139,030
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	$	75,411	$	73,971

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings (repayments) of warehouse notes payable, net	$	(744,281)	$	1,009,302
Borrowings of interim warehouse notes payable		84,766		33,127
Repayments of interim warehouse notes payable		(34,174)		(84,959)
Repayments of note payable		(1,490)		(1,489)
Repayment of secured borrowings		(73,312)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		13,137		6,565
Repurchase of common stock		(14,190)		(27,142)
Purchase of noncontrolling interests		—		(5,216)
Cash dividends paid		(32,122)		(22,641)
Payment of contingent consideration		—		(1,641)
Debt issuance costs		(1,333)		(1,932)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(802,999)	$	903,974

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents (NOTE 2)	$	31,754	$	155,302
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period		358,002		136,566
Total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period	$	389,756	$	291,868

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid to third parties for interest	$	16,708	$	24,237
Cash paid for income taxes		26,723		1,479

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These financial statements represent the condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Walker & Dunlop” and the “Company” mean the Walker & Dunlop consolidated companies. The statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they may not include certain financial statement disclosures and other information required for annual financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Form 10-K”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the Company in the interim periods presented have been included. Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2021 or thereafter.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company and conducts the majority of its operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, the operating company. Walker & Dunlop is one of the leading commercial real estate services and finance companies in the United States. The Company originates, sells, and services a range of commercial real estate debt and equity financing products, provides multifamily property sales brokerage and valuation services, engages in commercial real estate investment management activities, provides housing market research, and delivers real estate-related investment banking and advisory services.

Through its agency lending products, the Company originates and sells loans pursuant to the programs of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac” and, together with Fannie Mae, the “GSEs”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, “HUD”). Through its debt brokerage products, the Company brokers, and in some cases services, loans for various life insurance companies, commercial banks, commercial mortgage-backed securities issuers, and other institutional investors, in which cases the Company does not fund the loan.

The Company also provides a variety of commercial real estate debt and equity solutions through its principal lending and investing products, including interim loans, and preferred and joint venture equity on commercial real estate properties. Interim loans on multifamily properties are offered (i) through the Company and recorded on the Company’s balance sheet (the “Interim Loan Program”) and (ii) through a joint venture with an affiliate of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc., in which the Company holds a 15% ownership interest (the “Interim Program JV”). Interim loans on all commercial real estate property types are also offered through separate accounts managed by the Company’s subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop Investment Partners, Inc. (“WDIP”). Preferred and joint venture equity on commercial real estate properties are offered through funds managed by WDIP.

The Company brokers the sale of multifamily properties through its wholly owned subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop Investment Sales, LLC (“WDIS”). In some cases, the Company also provides the debt financing for the property sale.

The Company has a joint venture, branded as “Apprise by Walker & Dunlop,” with an international technology services company to offer automated multifamily valuation and appraisal services (the “Appraisal JV”). The Appraisal JV leverages technology and data science to dramatically improve the consistency, transparency, and speed of multifamily appraisals in the U.S. through the licensing of the partner’s technology and leveraging of the Company’s expertise in the commercial real estate industry. The Company owns a 50% interest in the Appraisal JV and accounts for the interest as an equity-method investment. The operations of the Appraisal JV for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were immaterial.

During the third quarter of 2021, the Company closed on the acquisition of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Zelman Holdings, LLC (“Zelman”) through a 75% interest in a newly formed entity, WDIB, LLC (“WDIB”). WDIB will provide housing market research and real estate-related investment banking and advisory services.

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation—The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Walker & Dunlop, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiaries, and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest based on either the variable interest entity (“VIE”) or the voting

Table of Contents

interest model. The Company is required to first apply the VIE model to determine whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, and if so, whether the entity is a VIE. If the Company determines it does not hold a variable interest in a VIE, it then applies the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, the Company consolidates an entity when it holds a majority voting interest in an entity. If the Company does not have a majority voting interest but has significant influence, it uses the equity method of accounting. In instances where the Company owns less than 100% of the equity interests of an entity but owns a majority of the voting interests or has control over an entity, the Company accounts for the portion of equity not attributable to Walker & Dunlop, Inc. as Noncontrolling interests on the balance sheet and the portion of net income not attributable to Walker & Dunlop, Inc. as Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests in the income statement.

Subsequent Events—The Company has evaluated the effects of all events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2021. The Company has made certain disclosures in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements of events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2021. There have been no other material subsequent events that would require recognition in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, allowance for risk-sharing obligations, capitalized mortgage servicing rights, derivative instruments, and the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Actual results may vary from these estimates.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities—Loan commitments that meet the definition of a derivative are recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets upon the executions of the commitments to originate a loan with a borrower and to sell the loan to an investor, with a corresponding amount recognized as revenue on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The estimated fair value of loan commitments includes (i) the fair value of loan origination fees and premiums on the anticipated sale of the loan, net of co-broker fees (included in Derivative assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and as a component of Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income), (ii) the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, net of any estimated net future cash flows associated with the guarantee obligation (included in Derivative assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and in Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income), and (iii) the effects of interest rate movements between the trade date and balance sheet date. Loan commitments are generally derivative assets but can become derivative liabilities if the effects of the interest rate movement between the trade date and the balance sheet date are greater than the combination of (i) and (ii) above. Forward sale commitments that meet the definition of a derivative are recorded as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities depending on the effects of the interest rate movements between the trade date and the balance sheet date. Adjustments to the fair value are reflected as a component of income within Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The co-broker fees for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $3.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively and $8.9 million and $15.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Loans Held for Investment, net—Loans held for investment are multifamily loans originated by the Company through the Interim Loan Program for properties that currently do not qualify for permanent GSE or HUD (collectively, the “Agencies”) financing. These loans have terms of up to three years and are all adjustable-rate, interest-only, multifamily loans with similar risk characteristics and no geographic concentration. The loans are carried at their unpaid principal balances, adjusted for net unamortized loan fees and costs, and net of any allowance for loan losses.

As of June 30, 2021, Loans held for investment, net consisted of nine loans with an aggregate $276.7 million of unpaid principal balance less $0.5 million of net unamortized deferred fees and costs and $4.2 million of allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2020, Loans held for investment, net consisted of 18 loans with an aggregate $366.3 million of unpaid principal balance less $1.1 million of net unamortized deferred fees and costs and $4.8 million of allowance for loan losses.

During the third quarter of 2018, the Company transferred a portfolio of participating interests in loans held for investment to a third party that was paid off in the second quarter of 2021. The Company accounted for the transfer as a secured borrowing, with the aggregate unpaid principal balance of the loans of $81.5 million presented as a component of Loans held for investment, net on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020, and the secured borrowing of $73.3 million presented within Other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020.

The Company assesses the credit quality of loans held for investment in the same manner as it does for the loans in the Fannie Mae at-risk portfolio and records an allowance for these loans as necessary. The allowance for loan losses is estimated collectively for loans with

Table of Contents

similar characteristics. The collective allowance is based on the same methodology that the Company uses to estimate its allowance for risk-sharing obligations under the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) standard for at-risk Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (“DUS”) loans (with the exception of a reversion period) because the nature of the underlying collateral is the same, and the loans have similar characteristics, except they are significantly shorter in maturity. The reasonable and supportable forecast period used for the CECL allowance for loans held for investment is one year.

The loss rate for the forecast period was 15 basis points and 36 basis points as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The loss rate for the remaining period until maturity was nine basis points as of both June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

One loan held for investment with an unpaid principal balance of $14.7 million that was originated in 2017 was delinquent and on non-accrual status as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The Company had a $3.7 million reserve for this loan based on its collateral fair value as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 and has not recorded any interest related to this loan since it went on non-accrual status in 2019. All other loans were current as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The amortized cost basis of loans that were current as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $261.5 million and $350.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2021, $77.4 million, $46.1 million, and $138.5 million of the loans that were current were originated in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Prior to 2019, the Company had not experienced any delinquencies related to loans held for investment.

Provision (Benefit) for Credit Losses—The Company records the income statement impact of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for risk-sharing obligations within Provision (benefit) for credit losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. NOTE 4 contains additional discussion related to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations. Provision (benefit) for credit losses consisted of the following activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Components of Provision (Benefit) for Credit Losses (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Provision (benefit) for loan losses	$	(75)	$	(178)	$	(662)	$	928
Provision (benefit) for risk-sharing obligations		(4,251)		5,081		(14,984)		27,618
Provision (benefit) for credit losses	$	(4,326)	$	4,903	$	(15,646)	$	28,546

Net Warehouse Interest Income—The Company presents warehouse interest income net of warehouse interest expense. Warehouse interest income is the interest earned from loans held for sale and loans held for investment. Generally, a substantial portion of the Company’s loans is financed with matched borrowings under one of its warehouse facilities. The remaining portion of loans not funded with matched borrowings is financed with the Company’s own cash. The Company also occasionally fully funds a small number of loans held for sale or loans held for investment with its own cash. Warehouse interest expense is incurred on borrowings used to fund loans solely while they are held for sale or for investment. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for sale after a loan is closed and before a loan is sold. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for investment after a loan is closed and before a loan is repaid. Included in Net warehouse interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 are the following components:

Table of Contents


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Components of Net Warehouse Interest Income (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Warehouse interest income - loans held for sale	$	7,863	$	17,098	$	16,981	$	24,501
Warehouse interest expense - loans held for sale		(4,979)		(10,785)		(11,638)		(16,695)
Net warehouse interest income - loans held for sale	$	2,884	$	6,313	$	5,343	$	7,806

Warehouse interest income - loans held for investment	$	2,962	$	4,763	$	6,190	$	11,068
Warehouse interest expense - loans held for investment		(1,216)		(1,675)		(2,348)		(3,978)
Warehouse interest income - secured borrowings		883		849		1,748		1,695
Warehouse interest expense - secured borrowings		(883)		(849)		(1,748)		(1,695)
Net warehouse interest income - loans held for investment	$	1,746	$	3,088	$	3,842	$	7,090

Total net warehouse interest income	$	4,630	$	9,401	$	9,185	$	14,896

Statement of Cash Flows—For presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers pledged cash and cash equivalents (as detailed in NOTE 9) to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The following table presents a reconciliation of the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to the related captions in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2021 and 2020 and December 31, 2020 and 2019.


	June 30,				December 31,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2020		2019
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326,518	$	275,202	$	321,097	$	120,685
Restricted cash		15,842		10,894		19,432		8,677
Pledged cash and cash equivalents (NOTE 9)		47,396		5,772		17,473		7,204
Total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents	$	389,756	$	291,868	$	358,002	$	136,566

Income Taxes—The Company records the realizable excess tax benefits from stock compensation as a reduction to income tax expense. The realizable excess tax benefits were $1.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $5.2 million and $3.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Contracts with Customers—A majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from the following sources, all of which are excluded from the accounting provisions applicable to contracts with customers: (i) financial instruments, (ii) transfers and servicing, (iii) derivative transactions, and (iv) investments in debt securities/equity-method investments. The remaining portion of revenues is derived from contracts with customers. The Company’s contracts with customers do not require significant judgment or material estimates that affect the determination of the transaction price (including the assessment of variable consideration), the allocation of the transaction price to performance obligations, and the determination of the timing of the satisfaction of performance obligations. Additionally, the earnings process for the Company’s contracts with customers is not complicated and is generally completed in a short period of time. The following table presents information about the Company’s contracts with customers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Description (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020		Statement of income line item
Certain loan origination fees	$	43,222	$	8,689	$	67,123	$	30,037	Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net
Property sales broker fees		22,454		3,561		31,496		13,173	Property sales broker fees
Investment management fees, application fees, and other		7,928		4,649		14,178		10,101	Other revenues
Total revenues derived from contracts with customers	$	73,604	$	16,899	$	112,797	$	53,311

Litigation—In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be party to various claims and litigation, none of which the Company believes is material. The Company cannot predict the outcome of any pending litigation and may be subject to consequences that could include fines, penalties, and other costs, and the Company’s reputation and business may be impacted. The Company believes that any liability that

Table of Contents

could be imposed on the Company in connection with the disposition of any pending lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.

Recently Adopted and Recently Announced Accounting Pronouncements—There have been no material changes to the accounting policies discussed in NOTE 2 of the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K. There are no recently announced but not yet effective accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact to the Company as of June 30, 2021.

Reclassifications—The Company has made certain immaterial reclassifications to prior-year balances to conform to current-year presentations.

NOTE 3—MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS

The fair value of the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. The Company uses a discounted static cash flow valuation approach, and the key economic assumption is the discount rate. For example, see the following sensitivities:

The impact of a 100-basis point increase in the discount rate at June 30, 2021 would be a decrease in the fair value of $36.9 million to the MSRs outstanding as of June 30, 2021.

The impact of a 200-basis point increase in the discount rate at June 30, 2021 would be a decrease in the fair value of $71.4 million to the MSRs outstanding as June 30, 2021.

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. These estimates do not include interplay among assumptions and are estimated as a portfolio rather than individual assets.

Activity related to MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 follows:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Roll Forward of MSRs (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	909,884	$	722,486	$	862,813	$	718,799
Additions, following the sale of loan		57,300		99,589		153,940		143,803
Amortization		(43,914)		(36,706)		(86,466)		(71,924)
Pre-payments and write-offs		(7,751)		(7,100)		(14,768)		(12,409)
Ending balance	$	915,519	$	778,269	$	915,519	$	778,269

The following table summarizes the gross value, accumulated amortization, and net carrying value of the Company’s MSRs as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:


Components of MSRs (in thousands)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Gross Value	$	1,492,694	$	1,394,901
Accumulated amortization		(577,175)		(532,088)
Net carrying value	$	915,519	$	862,813

The expected amortization of MSRs held in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021 is shown in the table below. Actual amortization may vary from these estimates.

Table of Contents


	Expected
(in thousands)	Amortization
Six Months Ending December 31,
2021	$	85,722
Year Ending December 31,
2022	$	161,765
2023		147,795
2024		126,499
2025		106,360
2026		86,897
Thereafter		200,481
Total	$	915,519

NOTE 4—GUARANTY OBLIGATION AND ALLOWANCE FOR RISK-SHARING OBLIGATIONS

When a loan is sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, the Company typically agrees to guarantee a portion of the ultimate loss incurred on the loan should the borrower fail to perform. The compensation for this risk is a component of the servicing fee on the loan. The guaranty is in force while the loan is outstanding. The Company does not provide a guaranty for any other loan product it sells or brokers. Activity related to the guaranty obligation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is presented in the following table:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Roll Forward of Guaranty Obligation (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	51,836	$	55,758	$	52,306	$	54,695
Additions, following the sale of loan		853		1,608		2,574		3,470
Amortization		(2,320)		(2,494)		(4,511)		(4,761)
Other		—		—		—		1,468
Ending balance	$	50,369	$	54,872	$	50,369	$	54,872

Substantially all loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program contain partial or full risk-sharing guaranties that are based on the credit performance of the loan. The Company records an estimate of the loss reserve for CECL for all loans in its Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio and presents this loss reserve as Allowance for risk-sharing obligations on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company utilizes the weighted-average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method to calculate the CECL reserve and one year for the reasonable and supportable forecast period (the “forecast period”) as the Company currently believes forecasts beyond one year are inherently less reliable. The WARM method uses an average annual charge-off rate that contains loss content over multiple vintages and loan terms and is used as a foundation for estimating the CECL reserve. The average annual charge-off rate is applied to the unpaid principal balance over the contractual term, further adjusted for estimated prepayments and amortization to arrive at the CECL reserve for the entire current portfolio. Activity related to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 follows:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Roll Forward of Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	64,580	$	64,110	$	75,313	$	11,471
Adjustment related to adoption of CECL		—		—		—		31,570
Provision (benefit) for risk-sharing obligations		(4,251)		5,081		(14,984)		27,618
Write-offs		—		—		—		—
Other		—		—		—		(1,468)
Ending balance	$	60,329	$	69,191	$	60,329	$	69,191

Table of Contents

As a result of the onset of the pandemic and the resulting forecasts for significant unemployment rates during 2020, the Company’s loss rate for the forecast period was seven basis points as of June 30, 2020, resulting in the substantial provision for risk-sharing obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and an increase in the allowance for risk-sharing obligations as of June 30, 2020 as seen above. During the first half of 2021, economic conditions began to improve significantly, with reported and forecast unemployment rates significantly better compared to both December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020. In response to improving unemployment statistics and the expected continued overall health of the multifamily market, the Company adjusted the loss rate for the forecast period from six basis points as of December 31, 2020 to four basis points as of March 31, 2021 and three basis points as of June 30, 2021. These decreases in the loss rate resulted in the benefits for risk-sharing obligations seen above. For the remaining expected life of the portfolio, the Company reverted over a one-year period on a straight-line basis to a historical loss rate of two basis points for all periods shown in the roll forward above.

The calculated CECL reserve for the Company’s $45.9 billion at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio as of June 30, 2021 was $52.8 million compared to $67.0 million as of December 31, 2020. The weighted-average remaining life of the at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio as of June 30, 2021 was 7.5 years. The at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio does not include at-risk loans held for sale.

Two loans that defaulted in 2019 had aggregate collateral-based reserves of $7.6 million and $8.3 million as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

As of June 30, 2021, the maximum quantifiable contingent liability associated with the Company’s guarantees for the at-risk loans serviced under the Fannie Mae DUS agreement was $9.5 billion. The maximum quantifiable contingent liability is not representative of the actual loss the Company would incur. The Company would be liable for this amount only if all of the loans it services for Fannie Mae, for which the Company retains some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans were determined to be without value at the time of settlement.

NOTE 5—SERVICING

The total unpaid principal balance of loans the Company was servicing for various institutional investors was $112.3 billion as of June 30, 2021 compared to $107.2 billion as of December 31, 2020.

As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, custodial escrow accounts relating to loans serviced by the Company totaled $3.0 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. These amounts are not included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as such amounts are not Company assets; however, the Company is entitled to earn interest income on these escrow balances, presented as a component of Escrow earnings and other interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain cash deposits at other financial institutions exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. The Company places these deposits with financial institutions that meet the requirements of the Agencies and where it believes the risk of loss to be minimal.

NOTE 6—WAREHOUSE NOTES PAYABLE

As of June 30, 2021, to provide financing to borrowers under the Agencies’ programs, the Company has committed and uncommitted warehouse lines of credit in the amount of $3.9 billion with certain national banks and a $1.5 billion uncommitted facility with Fannie Mae (collectively, the “Agency Warehouse Facilities”). In support of these Agency Warehouse Facilities, the Company has pledged substantially all of its loans held for sale under the Company’s approved programs. The Company’s ability to originate mortgage loans for sale depends upon its ability to secure and maintain these types of short-term financings on acceptable terms.

Additionally, as of June 30, 2021, the Company has arranged for warehouse lines of credit in the amount of $0.4 billion with certain national banks to assist in funding loans held for investment under the Interim Loan Program (“Interim Warehouse Facilities”). The Company has pledged substantially all of its loans held for investment against these Interim Warehouse Facilities. The Company’s ability to originate loans held for investment depends upon its ability to secure and maintain these types of short-term financings on acceptable terms.

Table of Contents

The maximum amount and outstanding borrowings under Warehouse notes payable at June 30, 2021 follows:


	June 30, 2021
(dollars in thousands)	Committed		Uncommitted		Total Facility		Outstanding
Facility⁽¹⁾	Amount		Amount		Capacity		Balance		Interest rate⁽²⁾
Agency Warehouse Facility #1	$	425,000	$	—	$	425,000	$	347,747	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #2		700,000		300,000		1,000,000		390,370	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #3		600,000		265,000		865,000		125,951	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #4		350,000		—		350,000		246,769	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #5		—		1,000,000		1,000,000		276,874	30-day LIBOR plus 1.45%
Agency Warehouse Facility #6		150,000		100,000		250,000		70,913	30-day LIBOR plus 1.40%
Total National Bank Agency Warehouse Facilities	$	2,225,000	$	1,665,000	$	3,890,000	$	1,458,624
Fannie Mae repurchase agreement, uncommitted line and open maturity		—		1,500,000		1,500,000		180,953
Total Agency Warehouse Facilities	$	2,225,000	$	3,165,000	$	5,390,000	$	1,639,577

Interim Warehouse Facility #1	$	135,000	$	—	$	135,000	$	71,572	30-day LIBOR plus 1.90%
Interim Warehouse Facility #2		100,000		—		100,000		34,000	30-day LIBOR plus 1.65% to 2.00%
Interim Warehouse Facility #3		75,000		75,000		150,000		59,453	30-day LIBOR plus 1.75% to 3.25%
Interim Warehouse Facility #4		19,810		—		19,810		19,810	30-day LIBOR plus 3.00%
Total National Bank Interim Warehouse Facilities	$	329,810	$	75,000	$	404,810	$	184,835
Debt issuance costs		—		—		—		(430)
Total warehouse facilities	$	2,554,810	$	3,240,000	$	5,794,810	$	1,823,982

(1)	Agency Warehouse Facilities, including the Fannie Mae repurchase agreement are used to fund loans held for sale, while Interim Warehouse Facilities are used to fund loans held for investment.

(2)	Interest rate presented does not include the effect of interest rate floors.

The following amendments to the Agency Warehouse Facilities were executed in the normal course of business to support the growth of the Company’s Agency business.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company executed an amendment to the agreement related to Agency Warehouse Facility #1 that decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero from 25 basis points.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company executed amendments to the agreement related to Agency Warehouse Facility #2 that extended the maturity date to April 14, 2022 and decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company executed amendments to the agreement related to Agency Warehouse Facility #3 that extended the maturity date to May 14, 2022, increased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 115 basis points, and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero basis points from 50 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company executed an amendment to the agreement related to Agency Warehouse Facility #4 that extended the maturity date to June 22, 2022, decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points, and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to five basis points from 25 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

During the first quarter of 2021, the Company executed an agreement to establish Agency Warehouse Facility #6. The warehouse facility has a $150.0 million maximum committed borrowing capacity, provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans, and matures March 5, 2022. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and the borrowings under the warehouse agreement bear interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points with a 30-day LIBOR floor of 25 basis points. In addition to the committed borrowing capacity, the agreement provides $100.0 million of uncommitted borrowing capacity that bears interest at the same rate as the committed

Table of Contents

facility. The facility agreement requires the Company’s compliance with the same financial covenants as provided in the facility agreement for Agency Warehouse Facility #1, as described in the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K. No material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

During the second quarter of 2021, the Company executed amendments to the agreement related to Interim Warehouse Facility #1 that extended the maturity date to May 14, 2022 and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero basis points from 50 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

The warehouse notes payable are subject to various financial covenants, all of which the Company was in compliance with as of June 30, 2021.

Interest on the Company’s warehouse notes payable is based on 30-day LIBOR. As a result of the expected transition from LIBOR, the Company has updated its debt agreements to include fallback language to govern the transition from 30-day LIBOR to an alternative reference rate.

NOTE 7—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

A summary of the Company’s goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows:


	For the six months ended
	June 30,
Roll Forward of Goodwill (in thousands)	2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	248,958	$	180,424
Additions from acquisitions		17,507		68,534
Impairment		—		—
Ending balance	$	266,465	$	248,958

The immaterial additions to goodwill from acquisitions during 2021 shown in the table above during the six months ended June 30, 2021 relate to one acquisition in each of the first and second quarters of 2021. The activity in the first quarter of 2021 was from the purchase of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities from an investment sales brokerage company, for an aggregate consideration of $12.7 million, which consisted of $7.5 million of cash and $5.2 million of contingent consideration. The activity in the second quarter of 2021 was from the purchase of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities from a company with a technology platform that streamlines and accelerates the quoting, processing, and underwriting of small-balance multifamily loans while providing the borrower with a web-based, user-friendly interface. The acquisition is part of the Company’s overall strategy to significantly increase its small-balance lending volumes using technology. The aggregate consideration paid was $5.3 million, which includes $3.0 million of cash and $2.3 million of contingent consideration. The Company completed the purchase accounting for both acquisitions.

During the third quarter of 2021, the Company acquired a controlling interest in Zelman, which specializes in housing market research and real estate-related investment banking and advisory services for $53.6 million of cash and $5.3 million of the Company’s common stock, subject to subsequent working capital adjustments. The Company has not completed the accounting for the acquisition as of the issuance date of these financial statements. Therefore, disclosures relating to the goodwill recognized and the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed could not be presented.

As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the remaining balance of intangible assets from acquisitions totaled $1.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2021, the weighted-average period over which the Company expects these intangible assets to be amortized is 3.7 years.

Table of Contents

A summary of the Company’s contingent consideration liabilities, which is included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 follows:


	For the six months ended
	June 30,
Roll Forward of Contingent Consideration Liabilities (in thousands)	2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	28,829	$	5,752
Additions		7,504		17,649
Accretion		906		497
Payments		—		(5,800)
Ending balance	$	37,239	$	18,098

The contingent consideration liabilities above relate to (i) acquisitions of debt brokerage companies and an investment sales brokerage company completed over the past several years, including 2021, (ii) the purchase of noncontrolling interests in 2020 and (iii) the aforementioned technology company acquired in 2021. The contingent consideration for each of the acquisitions may be earned over various lengths of time after each acquisition, with a maximum earn-out period of five years, provided certain revenue targets and other metrics have been met. The last of the earn-out periods related to the contingent consideration ends in the first quarter of 2026. In each case, the Company estimated the initial fair value of the contingent consideration using a probability-based, discounted cash flow model.

The contingent consideration included for the acquisitions and purchase of noncontrolling interests is non-cash and thus not reflected in the amount of cash consideration paid on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

NOTE 8—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company uses valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach to measure assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

●

Level 1—Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

●

Level 2—Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, discount rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, earnings rates, credit risk, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

●

Level 3—Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall valuation.

The Company's MSRs are measured at fair value at inception, and thereafter on a nonrecurring basis. That is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value measurement when there is evidence of impairment and for disclosure purposes (NOTE 3). The Company's MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of multifamily MSRs do occur on occasion, precise terms and conditions vary with each transaction and are not readily available. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the Company’s MSRs was developed using discounted cash flow models that calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model considers contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, estimated revenue from escrow accounts, costs to service, and other economic factors. The Company periodically reassesses and adjusts, when necessary, the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the model to reflect observable market conditions and assumptions that market participants consider in valuing MSR

Table of Contents

assets. During the first quarter of 2021, the Company reduced the discount rate and escrow earnings rate assumptions for its capitalized MSRs based on market participant data. MSRs are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

●

Derivative Instruments—The derivative positions consist of interest rate lock commitments with borrowers and forward sale agreements to the Agencies. The fair value of these instruments is estimated using a discounted cash flow model developed based on changes in the applicable U.S. Treasury rate and other observable market data. The value was determined after considering the potential impact of collateralization, adjusted to reflect nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company, and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

●

Loans Held for Sale—All loans held for sale presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are reported at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of the loans held for sale using discounted cash flow models that incorporate quoted observable inputs from market participants such as changes in the U.S. Treasury rate. Therefore, the Company classifies these loans held for sale as Level 2.

●

Pledged Securities—Investments in money market funds are valued using quoted market prices from recent trades. Therefore, the Company classifies this portion of pledged securities as Level 1. The Company determines the fair value of its AFS investments in Agency debt securities using discounted cash flows that incorporate observable inputs from market participants and then compares the fair value to broker estimates of fair value. Consequently, the Company classifies this portion of pledged securities as Level 2.

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy used to measure fair value:


							Balance as of
(in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Period End
June 30, 2021
Assets
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	1,718,444	$	—	$	1,718,444
Pledged securities		47,396		99,152		—		146,548
Derivative assets		—		—		36,751		36,751
Total	$	47,396	$	1,817,596	$	36,751	$	1,901,743

Liabilities
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	30,411	$	30,411
Total	$	—	$	—	$	30,411	$	30,411

December 31, 2020
Assets
Loans held for sale	$	—	$	2,449,198	$	—	$	2,449,198
Pledged securities		17,473		119,763		—		137,236
Derivative assets		—		—		49,786		49,786
Total	$	17,473	$	2,568,961	$	49,786	$	2,636,220

Liabilities
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	5,066	$	5,066
Total	$	—	$	—	$	5,066	$	5,066

There were no transfers between any of the levels within the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

Derivative instruments (Level 3) are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days). A roll forward of derivative instruments is presented below for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:


	Level 3 Fair Value Measurements:
	Derivative Instruments
	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Derivative Assets and Liabilities, net (in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Beginning balance	$	48,880	$	(14,390)	$	44,720	$	15,532
Settlements		(211,771)		(140,540)		(341,515)		(314,835)
Realized gains recorded in earnings⁽¹⁾		162,891		154,930		296,795		299,303
Unrealized gains (losses) recorded in earnings⁽¹⁾		6,340		13,346		6,340		13,346
Ending balance	$	6,340	$	13,346	$	6,340	$	13,346

(1)	Realized and unrealized gains (losses) from derivatives are recognized in Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table presents information about significant unobservable inputs used in the recurring measurement of the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2021:


	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input⁽¹⁾	Input Value ⁽¹⁾
Derivative assets	$	36,751	Discounted cash flow	Counterparty credit risk	—
Derivative liabilities	$	30,411	Discounted cash flow	Counterparty credit risk	—

(1)	Significant increases in this input may lead to significantly lower fair value measurements.

The carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 are presented below:


	June 30, 2021				December 31, 2020
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(in thousands)	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326,518	$	326,518	$	321,097	$	321,097
Restricted cash		15,842		15,842		19,432		19,432
Pledged securities		146,548		146,548		137,236		137,236
Loans held for sale		1,718,444		1,718,444		2,449,198		2,449,198
Loans held for investment, net		272,033		273,021		360,402		362,586
Derivative assets		36,751		36,751		49,786		49,786
Total financial assets	$	2,516,136	$	2,517,124	$	3,337,151	$	3,339,335

Financial Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	30,411	$	30,411	$	5,066	$	5,066
Secured borrowings		—		—		73,314		73,314
Warehouse notes payable		1,823,982		1,824,413		2,517,156		2,518,101
Note payable		290,498		293,284		291,593		294,773
Total financial liabilities	$	2,144,891	$	2,148,108	$	2,887,129	$	2,891,254

Table of Contents

The following methods and assumptions were used for recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash—The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments (Level 1).

Pledged Securities—Consist of cash, highly liquid investments in money market accounts invested in government securities, and investments in Agency debt securities. The investments of the money market funds typically have maturities of 90 days or less and are valued using quoted market prices from recent trades. The fair value of the Agency debt securities incorporates the contractual cash flows of the security discounted at market-rate, risk-adjusted yields.

Loans Held for Sale—Consist of originated loans that are generally transferred or sold within 60 days from the date that a mortgage loan is funded and are valued using discounted cash flow models that incorporate observable prices from market participants.

Derivative Instruments—Consist of interest rate lock commitments and forward sale agreements. These instruments are valued using discounted cash flow models developed based on changes in the U.S. Treasury rate and other observable market data. The value is determined after considering the potential impact of collateralization, adjusted to reflect nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments and Loans Held for Sale—In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual commitments to originate and sell multifamily mortgage loans at fixed prices with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers "lock-in" a specified interest rate within time frames established by the Company. All mortgagors are evaluated for creditworthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the "lock-in" of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to an investor.

To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, the Company enters into a sale commitment with the investor simultaneously with the rate lock commitment with the borrower. The sale contract with the investor locks in an interest rate and price for the sale of the loan. The terms of the contract with the investor and the rate lock with the borrower are matched in substantially all respects, with the objective of eliminating interest rate risk to the extent practical. Sale commitments with the investors have an expiration date that is longer than our related commitments to the borrower to allow, among other things, for the closing of the loan and processing of paperwork to deliver the loan into the sale commitment.

Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to buyers are undesignated derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The fair value of the Company's rate lock commitments to borrowers and loans held for sale and the related input levels includes, as applicable:

●

the estimated gain of the expected loan sale to the investor (Level 2);

●

the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loan, net of any guaranty obligations retained (Level 2);

●

the effects of interest rate movements between the date of the rate lock and the balance sheet date (Level 2); and

●

the nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company (Level 3; derivative instruments only).

The estimated gain considers the origination fees the Company expects to collect upon loan closing (derivative instruments only) and premiums the Company expects to receive upon sale of the loan (Level 2). The fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loan is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques applicable to the fair value of future servicing, net at loan sale (Level 2).

To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company uses applicable published U.S. Treasury prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount (Level 2).

The fair value of the Company's forward sales contracts to investors considers effects of interest rate movements between the trade date and the balance sheet date (Level 2). The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward sales contracts to measure the fair value.

The fair value of the Company’s interest rate lock commitments and forward sales contracts is adjusted to reflect the risk that the agreement will not be fulfilled. The Company’s exposure to nonperformance in interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Given the credit quality of our counterparties and the short duration of interest rate

Table of Contents

lock commitments and forward sale contracts, the risk of nonperformance by the Company’s counterparties has historically been minimal (Level 3).

The following table presents the components of fair value and other relevant information associated with the Company’s derivative instruments and loans held for sale as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:


			Fair Value Adjustment Components						Balance Sheet Location
													Fair Value
	Notional or		Estimated				Total						Adjustment
	Principal		Gain		Interest Rate		Fair Value		Derivative		Derivative		to Loans
(in thousands)	Amount		on Sale		Movement		Adjustment		Assets		Liabilities		Held for Sale
June 30, 2021
Rate lock commitments	$	816,038	$	27,913	$	7,958	$	35,871	$	36,202	$	(331)	$	—
Forward sale contracts		2,470,432		—		(29,531)		(29,531)		549		(30,080)		—
Loans held for sale		1,654,394		42,477		21,573		64,050		—		—		64,050
Total			$	70,390	$	—	$	70,390	$	36,751	$	(30,411)	$	64,050

December 31, 2020
Rate lock commitments	$	1,374,784	$	45,581	$	(1,697)	$	43,884	$	43,895	$	(11)	$	—
Forward sale contracts		3,760,953		—		836		836		5,891		(5,055)		—
Loans held for sale		2,386,169		62,167		861		63,028		—		—		63,028
Total			$	107,748	$	—	$	107,748	$	49,786	$	(5,066)	$	63,028

NOTE 9—FANNIE MAE COMMITMENTS AND PLEDGED SECURITIES

Fannie Mae DUS Related Commitments—Commitments for the origination and subsequent sale and delivery of loans to Fannie Mae represent those mortgage loan transactions where the borrower has locked an interest rate and scheduled closing, and the Company has entered into a mandatory delivery commitment to sell the loan to Fannie Mae. As discussed in NOTE 8, the Company accounts for these commitments as derivatives recorded at fair value.

The Company is generally required to share the risk of any losses associated with loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program. The Company is required to secure these obligations by assigning restricted cash balances and securities to Fannie Mae, which are classified as Pledged securities, at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount of collateral required by Fannie Mae is a formulaic calculation at the loan level and considers the balance of the loan, the risk level of the loan, the age of the loan, and the level of risk-sharing. Fannie Mae requires restricted liquidity for Tier 2 loans of 75 basis points, which is funded over a 48-month period that begins upon delivery of the loan to Fannie Mae. Pledged securities held in the form of money market funds holding U.S. Treasuries are discounted 5%, and Agency mortgage-backed securities (“Agency MBS”) are discounted 4% for purposes of calculating compliance with the restricted liquidity requirements. As seen below, the Company held the majority of its pledged securities in Agency MBS as of June 30, 2021. The majority of the loans for which the Company has risk sharing are Tier 2 loans.

The Company is in compliance with the June 30, 2021 collateral requirements as outlined above. As of June 30, 2021, reserve requirements for the DUS loan portfolio will require the Company to fund $66.9 million in additional restricted liquidity over the next 48 months, assuming no further principal paydowns, prepayments, or defaults within the at-risk portfolio. Fannie Mae has in the past reassessed the DUS Capital Standards and may make changes to these standards in the future. The Company generates sufficient cash flow from its operations to meet these capital standards and does not expect any future changes to have a material impact on its future operations; however, any future increases to collateral requirements may adversely impact the Company’s available cash.

Fannie Mae has established benchmark standards for capital adequacy and reserves the right to terminate the Company's servicing authority for all or some of the portfolio if, at any time, it determines that the Company's financial condition is not adequate to support its obligations under the DUS agreement. The Company is required to maintain acceptable net worth as defined in the agreement, and the Company satisfied the requirements as of June 30, 2021. The net worth requirement is derived primarily from unpaid principal balances on Fannie Mae loans and the level of risk sharing. At June 30, 2021, the net worth requirement was $245.4 million, and the Company's net worth, as defined in the requirements, was $1.1 billion, as measured at our wholly owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC. As of June 30, 2021, the

Table of Contents

Company was required to maintain at least $48.7 million of liquid assets to meet operational liquidity requirements for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and Ginnie Mae, and the Company had operational liquidity, as defined in the requirements, of $359.3 million as of June 30, 2021, as measured at our wholly owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC.

Pledged Securities, at Fair Value—Pledged securities, at fair value consisted of the following balances as of June 30, 2021 and 2020 and December 31, 2020 and 2019:


	June 30,				December 31,
Pledged Securities (in thousands)	2021		2020		2020		2019
Restricted cash	$	7,442	$	1,768	$	4,954	$	2,150
Money market funds		39,954		4,004		12,519		5,054
Total pledged cash and cash equivalents	$	47,396	$	5,772	$	17,473	$	7,204
Agency MBS		99,152		122,524		119,763		114,563
Total pledged securities, at fair value	$	146,548	$	128,296	$	137,236	$	121,767

The information in the preceding table is presented to reconcile beginning and ending cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as more fully discussed in NOTE 2.

The Company’s investments included within Pledged securities, at fair value consist primarily of money market funds and Agency debt securities. The investments in Agency debt securities consist of multifamily Agency MBS and are all accounted for as AFS securities. When the fair value of Agency MBS is lower than the carrying value, the Company assesses whether an allowance for credit losses is necessary. The Company does not record an allowance for credit losses for its AFS securities, including those whose fair value is less than amortized cost, when the AFS securities are issued by the GSEs. The contractual cash flows of these AFS securities are guaranteed by the GSEs, which are government-sponsored enterprises under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of these securities. The Company does not intend to sell any of the Agency MBS, nor does the Company believe that it is more likely than not that it would be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. The following table provides additional information related to the Agency MBS as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020:


Fair Value and Amortized Cost of Agency MBS (in thousands)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020
Fair value	$	99,152	$	119,763
Amortized cost		95,710		117,136
Total gains for securities with net gains in AOCI		3,572		2,669
Total losses for securities with net losses in AOCI		(130)		(42)
Fair value of securities with unrealized losses		2,204		12,267

None of the pledged securities has been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months.

The following table provides contractual maturity information related to Agency MBS. The money market funds invest in short-term Federal Government and Agency debt securities and have no stated maturity date.


	June 30, 2021
Detail of Agency MBS Maturities (in thousands)	Fair Value		Amortized Cost
Within one year	$	—	$	—
After one year through five years		6,820		6,792
After five years through ten years		64,196		63,407
After ten years		28,136		25,511
Total	$	99,152	$	95,710

NOTE 10—EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates all earnings (distributed and undistributed) to each class of common stock and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. The Company

Table of Contents

grants share-based awards to various employees and nonemployee directors under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan that entitle recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities.

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 under the two-class method. Participating securities were included in the calculation of diluted EPS using the two-class method, as this computation was more dilutive than the treasury-stock method.


	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
EPS Calculations (in thousands, except per share amounts)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Calculation of basic EPS
Walker & Dunlop net income	$	56,058	$	62,059	$	114,110	$	109,888
Less: dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities		1,831		1,873		3,798		3,392
Net income applicable to common stockholders	$	54,227	$	60,186	$	110,312	$	106,496
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		31,019		30,352		30,922		30,288
Basic EPS	$	1.75	$	1.98	$	3.57	$	3.52

Calculation of diluted EPS
Net income applicable to common stockholders	$	54,227	$	60,186	$	110,312	$	106,496
Add: reallocation of dividends and undistributed earnings based on assumed conversion		14		25		34		57
Net income allocated to common stockholders	$	54,241	$	60,211	$	110,346	$	106,553
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding		31,019		30,352		30,922		30,288
Add: weighted-average diluted non-participating securities		351		508		400		672
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding		31,370		30,860		31,322		30,960
Diluted EPS	$	1.73	$	1.95	$	3.52	$	3.44

The assumed proceeds used for calculating the dilutive impact of restricted stock awards under the treasury-stock method includes the unrecognized compensation costs associated with the awards. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, an immaterial number of average restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share under the treasury method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, 537 thousand average restricted shares and an immaterial number of average restricted shares, respectively, were excluded. These average restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share under the treasury method because the effect would have been anti-dilutive, as the grant date market price of the restricted shares was greater than the average market price of the Company’s shares during the periods presented.

The Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of the Company’s common stock over a 12-month period beginning on February 12, 2021. During the first and second quarters of 2021, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock under the share repurchase program. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had $75.0 million of authorized share repurchase capacity remaining under the 2021 share repurchase program.

During each of the first and second quarters of 2021, the Company paid a dividend of $0.50 per share. On August 4, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.50 per share for the third quarter of 2021. The dividend will be paid on September 3, 2021 to all holders of record of the Company’s restricted and unrestricted common stock as of August 19, 2021.

The Company’s Note payable (“Term Loan”) contains direct restrictions on the amount of dividends the Company may pay, and the warehouse debt facilities and agreements with the Agencies contain minimum equity, liquidity, and other capital requirements that indirectly restrict the amount of dividends the Company may pay. The Company does not believe that these restrictions currently limit the amount of dividends the Company can pay for the foreseeable future.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”). The following discussion contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that include risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or contemplated in those forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Form 10-K”).

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Walker & Dunlop,” “we,” or “us”), may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans, or intentions.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q reflect our current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and changes in circumstances that may cause actual results to differ significantly from those expressed or contemplated in any forward-looking statement. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking:

●

the future of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac,” and together with Fannie Mae, the “GSEs”), including their existence, relationship to the U.S. federal government, origination capacities, and their impact on our business;

●

changes to and trends in the interest rate environment and its impact on our business;

●

our growth strategy;

●

our projected financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations;

●

our ability to obtain and maintain warehouse and other loan funding arrangements;

●

our ability to make future dividend payments or repurchase shares of our common stock;

●

availability of and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and our ability to develop and retain relationships with borrowers, key principals, and lenders;

●

degree and nature of our competition;

●

changes in governmental regulations and policies, tax laws and rates, and similar matters and the impact of such regulations, policies, and actions;

●

our ability to comply with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to us, including additional regulatory requirements for broker-dealer and other financial services firms that became applicable to us upon our acquisition of Zelman (as defined below);

●

trends in the commercial real estate finance market, commercial real estate values, the credit and capital markets, or the general economy, including demand for multifamily housing and rent growth;

●

general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock;

●

our ability to prevent, detect, and mitigate cybersecurity risks; and

Table of Contents

●

other risks and uncertainties associated with our business described in our 2020 Form 10-K and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

While forward-looking statements reflect our good-faith projections, assumptions, and expectations, they are not guarantees of future results. Furthermore, we disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, data or methods, future events or other changes, except as required by applicable law. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or contemplated in any forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors.”

Business

We are one of the leading commercial real estate services and finance companies in the United States, with a primary focus on multifamily lending, debt brokerage, and property sales. We were the largest lender to multifamily properties and the fourth largest overall commercial real estate lender in the country in 2020. We leverage our technological resources and investments to (i) provide an enhanced experience for our customers, (ii) identify refinancing and other financial opportunities for our existing customers, and (iii) identify potential new customers. We believe our people, brand, and technology provide us with a competitive advantage, as evidenced by the fact that 55% of refinancing volumes in the quarter were new loans to us and 22% of total transaction volumes were from new customers.

We have been in business for more than 80 years; a Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing™ ("DUS") lender since 1988, when the DUS program began; a lender with the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, “HUD”) since acquiring a HUD license in 2009; and a Freddie Mac Multifamily approved seller/servicer for Conventional Loans. We originate, sell, and service a range of multifamily and other commercial real estate financing products, provide multifamily property sales brokerage and appraisal services, and engage in commercial real estate investment management activities. We provide housing market research and real estate-related investment banking and advisory services, which provides our clients and us with market insight into many areas in the single-family and multifamily markets. Our clients are owners and developers of multifamily properties and other commercial real estate assets across the country, some of whom are the largest owners and developers in the industry. We originate and sell multifamily loans through the programs of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD (collectively, the “Agencies”). We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans that we originate for the Agencies’ programs. We are approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender nationally, an approved Freddie Mac Multifamily Optigo® Seller/Servicer (“Freddie Mac lender”) nationally for Conventional, Seniors Housing, Targeted Affordable Housing, and small balance loans, a HUD Multifamily Accelerated Processing (“MAP”) lender nationally, a HUD Section 232 LEAN (“LEAN”) lender nationally, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. We broker, and occasionally service, loans for many life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other institutional investors, in which cases we do not fund the loan but rather act as a loan broker. We also underwrite, service, and asset-manage interim loans. Most of these interim loans are closed through a joint venture or through separate accounts managed by our investment management subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop Investment Partners, Inc. (“WDIP”). Those interim loans not closed by the joint venture or WDIP are originated by us and presented on our balance sheet as loans held for investment.

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company. We conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our operating company.

Agency Lending and Loan Servicing

We recognize loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net from our lending with the Agencies when we commit to both originate a loan with a borrower and sell that loan to an investor. The loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net for these transactions reflect the fair value attributable to loan origination fees, premiums on the sale of loans, net of any co-broker fees, and the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loans, net of any guaranty obligations retained.

We generally fund our Agency loan products through warehouse facility financing and sell them to investors in accordance with the related loan sale commitment, which we obtain concurrent with rate lock. Proceeds from the sale of the loan are used to pay off the warehouse borrowing. The sale of the loan is typically completed within 60 days after the loan is closed. We earn net warehouse interest income from

Table of Contents

loans held for sale while they are outstanding equal to the difference between the note rate on the loan and the cost of borrowing of the warehouse facility.

We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all of our Agency loan products that we originate and sell and generate cash revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the interest income on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees relating to servicing the loans. Servicing fees, which are based on servicing fee rates set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan and on the unpaid principal balance of the loan, are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan. Our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection to us in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections. For most loans we service under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we are required to advance the principal and interest payments and guarantee fees for four months should a borrower cease making payments under the terms of their loan, including while that loan is in forbearance. After advancing for four months, we may request reimbursement by Fannie Mae for the principal and interest advances, and Fannie Mae will reimburse us for these advances within 60 days of the request. Under the Ginnie Mae program, we are obligated to advance the principal and interest payments and guarantee fees until the HUD loan is brought current, fully paid or assigned to HUD. We are eligible to assign a loan to HUD once it is in default for 30 days. If the loan is not brought current, or the loan otherwise defaults, we are not reimbursed for our advances until such time as we assign the loan to HUD or work out a payment modification for the borrower. For loans in default, we may repurchase those loans out of the Ginnie Mae security, at which time our advance requirements cease and we may then modify and resell the loan or assign the loan back to HUD, at which time we will be reimbursed for our advances. Under the Freddie Mac Optigo® program, and our bank and life insurance company servicing agreements, we are not obligated to make advances on the loans we service.

Our loan commitments and loans held for sale are currently not exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated prior to establishing the coupon rate for the loan. We also seek to mitigate the risk of a loan not closing. We have agreements in place with the Agencies that specify the cost of a failed loan delivery in the event we fail to deliver the loan to the investor. To protect us against such risk, we require a deposit from the borrower at rate lock that is typically more than the potential cost of non-delivery. The deposit is returned to the borrower only once the loan is closed. Any potential loss from a catastrophic change in the property condition while the loan is held for sale using warehouse facility financing is mitigated through property insurance equal to replacement cost. We are also protected contractually from an investor’s failure to purchase the loan. We have experienced an immaterial number of failed deliveries in our history and have incurred immaterial losses on such failed deliveries.

We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original unpaid principal balance of the loan (subject to doubling or tripling if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $250 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $50 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss). For loans in excess of $250 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $250 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transaction. The full risk-sharing limit in prior years was less than $250 million. Accordingly, loans originated in prior years may be subject to modified risk-sharing at much lower levels.

Our servicing fees for risk-sharing loans include compensation for the risk-sharing obligations and are larger than the servicing fees we would receive from Fannie Mae for loans with no risk-sharing obligations. We receive a lower servicing fee for modified risk-sharing than for full risk-sharing.

As part of our overall growth strategy, we are focused on significantly growing and investing in our small-balance lending business, which involves a high volume of transactions with smaller loan balances. In support of this business, we acquired a company with a technology platform that streamlines and accelerates the quoting, processing, and underwriting of small-balance, multifamily loans. Additionally, the technology platform provides the borrower with a web-based, user-friendly interface, enhancing the borrower’s experience during the origination process.

Table of Contents

Debt Brokerage

Our mortgage bankers who focus on debt brokerage are engaged by borrowers to work with a variety of institutional lenders to find the most appropriate loan instrument for the borrowers' needs. These loans are then funded directly by the institutional lender, and we receive an origination fee for placing the loan. For those brokered loans we also service, we collect ongoing servicing fees while those loans remain in our servicing portfolio. The servicing fees we typically earn on brokered loan transactions are substantially lower than the servicing fees we earn for servicing loans with the Agencies.

Principal Lending and Investing

Our “Interim Program” is composed of the loans held by the Interim Program JV and the Interim Loan Program as described below. Through a joint venture with an affiliate of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc., we offer short-term senior secured debt financing products that provide floating-rate, interest-only loans for terms of generally up to three years to experienced borrowers seeking to acquire or reposition multifamily properties that do not currently qualify for permanent financing (the “Interim Program JV” or the “joint venture”). The joint venture funds its operations using a combination of equity contributions from its owners and third-party credit facilities. We hold a 15% ownership interest in the Interim Program JV and are responsible for sourcing, underwriting, servicing, and asset-managing the loans originated by the joint venture. The Interim Program JV assumes full risk of loss while the loans it originates are outstanding, while we assume risk commensurate with our 15% ownership interest.

Using a combination of our own capital and warehouse debt financing, we offer interim loans that do not meet the criteria of the Interim Program JV (the “Interim Loan Program”). We underwrite, service, and asset-manage all loans executed through the Interim Loan Program. We originate and hold these Interim Loan Program loans for investment, which are included on our balance sheet, and during the time that these loans are outstanding, we assume the full risk of loss. The ultimate goal of the Interim Loan Program is to provide permanent Agency financing on these transitional properties.

WDIP and its subsidiaries function as the operator of a private commercial real estate investment adviser focused on the management of debt, preferred equity, and mezzanine equity investments in middle-market commercial real estate funds. The activities of WDIP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, are part of our strategy to grow and diversify our operations by growing our investment management platform. WDIP’s current assets under management (“AUM”) of $1.2 billion primarily consist of five sources: Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, and Fund VI (collectively, the “Funds”), and separate accounts managed for life insurance companies. AUM for the Funds consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments and AUM for the separate accounts consist entirely of funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fund raising and investment phases. WDIP receives management fees based on both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to the Funds, WDIP receives a percentage of the return above the fund return hurdle rate specified in the fund agreements.

Property Sales

We offer property sales brokerage services to owners and developers of multifamily properties that are seeking to sell these properties through our subsidiary Walker & Dunlop Investment Sales, LLC (“WDIS”). Through these property sales brokerage services, we seek to maximize proceeds and certainty of closure for our clients using our knowledge of the commercial real estate and capital markets and relying on our experienced transaction professionals. We receive a sales commission for brokering the sale of these multifamily assets on behalf of our clients, and we often times are able to provide financing to the purchaser of the properties through our Agency or debt brokerage teams. Our property sales services are offered in various regions throughout the United States. We have increased the number of property sales brokers and the geographical reach of our investment sales platform over the past several years through hiring and acquisitions and intend to continue this expansion in support of our growth strategy.

Appraisal Services

We have a joint venture branded Apprise by Walker & Dunlop with an international technology services company to offer automated multifamily appraisal services (“Appraisal JV”). The Appraisal JV leverages technology and data science to dramatically improve the consistency, transparency, and speed of multifamily property appraisals in the U.S. through the licensing of our partner’s technology and leveraging of our expertise in the commercial real estate industry. We own a 50% interest in the Appraisal JV and account for the interest as an equity-method investment. While the operations of the Appraisal JV for the quarter ended June 30, 2021 were immaterial, the Appraisal JV’s

Table of Contents

operations continue to rapidly grow with significant increases in the volume of appraisal reports generated and a client list that includes several national commercial real estate lenders.

Housing Market Research and Real Estate Investment Banking Services

During the third quarter of 2021, we closed on the acquisition of certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities of Zelman Holdings, LLC (“Zelman”) through a 75% interest in a newly formed entity, WDIB, LLC (“WDIB”). Zelman is a nationally recognized housing market research and investment banking firm that will enhance the information we provide to our clients and increase our access to high-quality market insight in many areas of the single-family and multifamily markets, including construction trends, demographics, mortgage finance, and real estate technology and services. Zelman generates revenues through the sale of its housing market research data and related publications to banks, investment banks and other financial institutions, and through its offering of real estate-related investment banking and advisory services.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which requires management to make estimates based on certain judgments and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions and the use of different judgments and assumptions may have a material impact on our results. We believe the following critical accounting estimates represent the areas where more significant judgments and estimates are used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements. Additional information about our critical accounting estimates and other significant accounting policies are discussed in NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements in our 2020 Form 10-K.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”). MSRs are recorded at fair value at loan sale or upon purchase. The fair value at loan sale (“OMSR”) is based on estimates of expected net cash flows associated with the servicing rights and takes into consideration an estimate of loan prepayment. Initially, the fair value amount is included as a component of the derivative asset fair value at the loan commitment date. The estimated net cash flows from servicing, which includes assumptions for discount rate, escrow earnings, prepayment speed, and servicing costs, are discounted at a rate that reflects the credit and liquidity risk of the OMSR over the estimated life of the underlying loan. The discount rates used for all OMSRs were between 8-14% and 10-15% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and varied based on the loan type. The life of the underlying loan is estimated giving consideration to the prepayment provisions in the loan and assumptions about loan behaviors around those provisions. Our model for OMSRs assumes no prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment provisions and full prepayment of the loan at or near the point when the prepayment provisions have expired. We record an individual OMSR asset (or liability) for each loan at loan sale. The fair value of MSRs acquired through a stand-alone servicing portfolio purchase (“PMSR”) is equal to the purchase price paid. For PMSRs, we record and amortize a portfolio-level MSR asset based on the estimated remaining life of the portfolio using the prepayment characteristics of the portfolio.

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of capitalized OMSRs are developed internally and are periodically compared to assumptions used by other market participants. Due to the relatively few transactions in the multifamily MSR market and the lack of significant changes in assumptions by market participants, we have experienced limited volatility in the assumptions historically, including the most-significant assumption – the discount rate. We do not expect to see significant volatility in the assumptions for the foreseeable future. We actively monitor the assumptions used and make adjustments to those assumptions when market conditions change, or other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. During the first quarter of 2021, we reduced the discount rate and escrow earnings rate assumptions for our OMSRs. We engage a third party to assist in determining an estimated fair value of our existing and outstanding MSRs on at least a semi-annual basis. Changes in our discount rate assumptions may materially impact the fair value of the MSRs (NOTE 3 of the condensed consolidated financial statements details the portfolio-level impact of a change in the discount rate).

For PMSRs, a constant rate of prepayments and defaults is included in the determination of the portfolio’s estimated life at purchase (and thus included as a component of the portfolio’s amortization). Accordingly, prepayments and defaults of individual loans do not change the level of amortization expense recorded for the portfolio unless the pattern of actual prepayments and defaults varies significantly from the

Table of Contents

estimated pattern. When such a significant difference in the pattern of estimated and actual prepayments and defaults occurs, we prospectively adjust the estimated life of the portfolio (and thus future amortization) to approximate the actual pattern observed. We have made adjustments to the estimated life of our PMSRs in the past when the actual experience of prepayments differed materially from the estimated prepayments.

Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations. This reserve liability (referred to as “allowance”) for risk-sharing obligations relates to our Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio and is presented as a separate liability on our balance sheets. We record an estimate of the loss reserve for the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for all loans in our Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio using the weighted-average remaining maturity method (“WARM”). WARM uses an average annual loss rate that contains loss content over multiple vintages and loan terms and is used as a foundation for estimating the CECL reserve. The average annual loss rate is applied to the estimated unpaid principal balance over the contractual term, adjusted for estimated prepayments and amortization to arrive at the CECL reserve for the entire current portfolio as described further below. We currently use one year for our reasonable and supportable forecast period (“forecast period”) as we believe forecasts beyond one year are inherently less reliable. During the forecast period, we apply an adjusted loss factor associated with a similar historical period. We revert to the historical loss rate over a one-year period on a straight-line basis.

One of the key components of a WARM calculation is the runoff rate, which is the expected rate at which loans in the current portfolio will amortize and prepay in the future. We group loans by similar origination dates (vintage) and contractual maturity terms for purposes of calculating the runoff rate. We originate loans under the DUS program with various terms generally ranging from several years to 15 years; each of these various loan terms has a different runoff rate. The runoff rates applied to each vintage and contractual maturity term is determined using historical data; however, changes in prepayment and amortization behavior may significantly impact the estimate.

The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a 10-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A 10-year period is used as we believe that this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. Changes in our expectations and forecasts may materially impact the estimate.

We evaluate our risk-sharing loans on a quarterly basis to determine whether there are loans that are probable of default. Specifically, we assess a loan’s qualitative and quantitative risk factors, such as payment status, property financial performance, local real estate market conditions, loan-to-value ratio, debt-service-coverage ratio, and property condition. When a loan is determined to be probable of default based on these factors, we remove the loan from the WARM calculation and individually assess the loan for potential credit loss. This assessment requires certain judgments and assumptions to be made regarding the property values and other factors, that may differ significantly from actual results. Loss settlement with Fannie Mae has historically concluded within 18 to 36 months after foreclosure. Historically, the initial collateral-based reserves have not varied significantly from the final settlement.

We actively monitor the judgments and assumptions used in our Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation estimate and make adjustments to those assumptions when market conditions change, or when other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. We believe the level of Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation is appropriate based on our expectations of future market conditions; however, changes in one or more of the judgments or assumptions used above could have a significant impact on the estimate.

Overview of Current Business Environment

Entering 2021, the pandemic continued to impact macroeconomic conditions with U.S. unemployment rates at elevated levels but significantly improved compared to the middle of 2020. Congress passed three pandemic stimulus packages to provide funding for government programs directly supporting households and businesses. Specifically, as it relates to our business, a total of $47 billion in renter assistance was funded, which enabled many renters to continue to meet monthly obligations. In the second quarter of 2021, vaccination programs across the U.S. accelerated and became widely available to the public, resulting in most jurisdictions eliminating or significantly curtailing economic restrictions. With the lifting of economic restrictions, macroeconomic conditions are recovering quickly with the reported unemployment rate falling to 5.9% as of June 2021 from 6.7% as of December 2020. Although vaccines and vaccination programs are widely available to the public and cases remain relatively low compared to the height of the pandemic, cases have begun to rise in July 2021 primarily due to new variants, and there is still uncertainty around the end of the pandemic and the ongoing economic recovery.

To support the economic recovery, the Federal Reserve set the Federal Funds Rate at a target of 0% to 0.25% at the beginning of the pandemic and has maintained that rate through the first six months of 2021. The Federal Reserve also indicated in its June 2021 meeting that it intends to keep rates at these low levels as the economy continues to recover and until the economy reaches what it believes is full employment.

Table of Contents

This action by the Federal Reserve, along with the Federal Reserve’s short-term commitment to continue buying Treasury securities and Agency mortgage-backed securities (“Agency MBS”) in amounts necessary to support the smooth functioning of capital markets, has enabled Agency securities to continue trading uninterrupted with little to no change in the credit spreads that drive pricing of Agency MBS and has contributed to very low long-term mortgage interest rates, which form the basis for most of our lending.

The Agencies responded to the pandemic by offering loan forbearance to borrowers for up to 180 days, provided a borrower is able to show that a property is experiencing a financial hardship as a direct result of the pandemic. Under the loan forbearance plan, borrowers will repay the forborne payments over a 12- to 24-month period without penalties. For borrowers under the loan forbearance plan, the Agencies also require the borrowers to halt eviction of tenants living in the financed assets and provide tenants flexibility in repayment of delinquent rent. In the second quarter of 2021, the Agencies extended this program through September 2021. The creation of the loan forbearance program may have a direct impact on some borrowers’ ability to make monthly debt service payments, and in turn, may impact the Company’s obligation to advance funds to bondholders under our servicing agreements with Fannie Mae and HUD. We do not have advance obligations with respect to our Freddie Mac or life insurance servicing agreements. To date, very few of our multifamily borrowers have requested loan forbearance, and our outstanding advances were immaterial under our Fannie Mae and HUD servicing agreements at June 30, 2021. Declining rent collections and a borrower’s inability to make all required payments once the forbearance period is over could lead to an increase in delinquencies and losses beyond what we have experienced since the great financial crisis of 2007-2010, although we have not experienced this to date and our current expectation is for credit conditions to continue improving over time as broad-based economic growth accelerates in a post-pandemic environment.

Multifamily property fundamentals prior to the pandemic were strong and have maintained this strength through the pandemic and the ongoing recovery with only minor disruptions during the pandemic. According to RealPage, a provider of commercial real estate data and analytics, occupancy rates have increased to 96.5% as of June 2021, compared to 95.8% as of December 2019, prior to the start of the pandemic. Rent growth in the second quarter of 2021 improved to an annualized growth rate of 6.3%.

Our multifamily property sales volumes grew significantly year over year in the second quarter of 2021, as (i) the multifamily acquisitions market was very active during the quarter, (ii) we have expanded the number of property sales brokers and the geographical reach of our property sales platform, and (iii) our volume in the second quarter of 2020 was unusually low due to the pandemic. Long term, we believe the market fundamentals will continue to be positive for multifamily property sales. Over the last several years, and in the months leading up to the pandemic, household formation and a dearth of supply of entry-level single-family homes led to strong demand for rental housing in most geographic areas. Consequently, the fundamentals of the multifamily property sales market were strong prior to the pandemic, and when coupled with the economic recovery and rising real-estate prices, it is our expectation that market demand for multifamily property sales will continue to grow as this asset class will remain an attractive investment option.

Our debt brokerage platform continued its strong growth into the second quarter of 2021, with brokered volume increasing significantly during the year. The increase in volume reflects the continued demand from private capital providers, with activity focused not only on multifamily but other commercial real estate assets such as office and retail. Additionally, our debt brokerage volume in the second quarter of 2020 was unusually low due to the pandemic. We expect the non-multifamily debt financing volumes to continue to recover over time as other commercial real estate asset classes stabilize post-pandemic.

Our Agency multifamily debt financing operations have remained very active over the past year. We are a market-leading originator with the Agencies, and we believe our market leadership positions us to be a significant lender with the Agencies for the foreseeable future.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) establishes loan origination caps for both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each year. In November 2020, FHFA established Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s 2021 loan origination caps at $70 billion each for all multifamily business. During the three months ended June 30, 2021, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had multifamily origination volumes of $10.9 billion and $13.1 billion, respectively, down 44.1% and 35.5%, respectively, from the same period in 2020. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had multifamily origination volumes of $32.4 billion and $27.1 billion, respectively, down 3.9% and 10.6% from the first half of 2020, respectively, leaving a combined $80.5 billion of available lending capacity for the remainder of the year. GSE lending volume slowed in the first half of 2021, as the GSEs’ pricing on multifamily debt has been less competitive as other capital sources reenter the market, and as the GSEs manage their originations under their lending caps. With a combined $80.5 billion or 58% of available lending capacity remaining, we expect the GSEs’ lending to accelerate in the second half of 2021.

Our debt financing operations with HUD remained strong during the first half of 2021, with HUD loan volumes increasing 5% and 30% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2020. The increase in HUD debt financing volumes was driven by continued strong demand for HUD’s multifamily lending product, which provides borrowers with favorable economics on long-term, fully amortizing debt.

Table of Contents

We expect strength in our Agency operations to continue despite the return of other capital sources. An additional positive factor influencing multifamily financing volumes is the historically low interest rate environment, which is incentivizing some borrowers to refinance their properties in spite of the prepayment penalty fees they may incur. We continue to seek additional resources and scale to our Agency lending platform.

Our originations with the Agencies are our most profitable executions as they provide significant non-cash gains from MSRs that turn into significant cash revenue streams from future servicing fees. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, servicing fees are up 21% and 20%, respectively, over the same periods last year due to the record amount of MSRs we generated in 2020. A decline in our Agency originations would negatively impact our financial results as our non-cash revenues would decrease disproportionately with debt financing volume and future servicing fee revenue would be constrained or decline.

We entered into the Interim Program JV to both increase the overall capital available to transitional multifamily properties and to dramatically expand our capacity to originate Interim Program loans. The demand for transitional lending has brought increased competition from lenders, specifically banks, mortgage real estate investment trusts, and life insurance companies. For the second quarter of 2021, we originated $206.5 million of Interim Program JV loans, compared to no originations in the second quarter of 2020. In the second quarter of 2020, we did not originate any new Interim Program loans as a result of the pandemic. Except for one loan that defaulted in early 2019, the loans in our portfolio and in the Interim Program JV continue to perform as agreed.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following is a discussion of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. The financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future, reflecting the interest-rate environment, the volume of transactions, business acquisitions, regulatory actions, industry trends, and general economic conditions. The table below provides supplemental data regarding our financial performance.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING DATA


	For the three months ended						For the six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2021			2020			2021			2020
Transaction Volume:
Components of Debt Financing Volume
Fannie Mae	$	1,911,976		$	2,762,299		$	3,445,000		$	6,933,790
Freddie Mac		1,003,319			1,769,280			2,016,039			2,767,076
Ginnie Mae ̶ HUD		672,574			640,150			1,294,707			994,837
Brokered⁽¹⁾		6,280,578			1,495,500			10,583,070			5,489,385
Principal Lending and Investing⁽²⁾		318,237			14,091			496,487			122,041
Total Debt Financing Volume	$	10,186,684		$	6,681,320		$	17,835,303		$	16,307,129
Property Sales Volume		3,341,532			446,684			4,737,292			2,177,301
Total Transaction Volume	$	13,528,216		$	7,128,004		$	22,572,595		$	18,484,430

Key Performance Metrics:
Operating margin		26	%		33	%		29	%		30	%
Return on equity		18			23			19			21
Walker & Dunlop net income	$	56,058		$	62,059		$	114,110		$	109,888
Adjusted EBITDA⁽³⁾		66,514			48,394			127,181			112,522
Diluted EPS		1.73			1.95			3.52			3.44

Key Expense Metrics (as a percentage of total revenues):
Personnel expenses		50	%		42	%		47	%		40	%
Other operating expenses		7			5			7			6

Key Revenue Metrics (as a percentage of debt financing volume):
Origination related fees⁽⁴⁾		1.07	%		1.17	%		1.04	%		0.95	%
MSR income⁽⁵⁾		0.63			1.36			0.69			0.98
MSR income, as a percentage of Agency debt financing volume⁽⁶⁾		1.72			1.75			1.77			1.48


(dollars in thousands)	As of June 30,
Managed Portfolio:	2021		2020
Components of Servicing Portfolio
Fannie Mae	$	51,077,660	$	45,160,004
Freddie Mac		37,887,969		33,222,090
Ginnie Mae - HUD		9,904,246		9,749,888
Brokered ⁽⁷⁾		13,129,969		11,519,629
Principal Lending and Investing ⁽⁸⁾		276,738		336,473
Total Servicing Portfolio	$	112,276,582	$	99,988,084
Assets under management ⁽⁹⁾		1,801,577		1,884,673
Total Managed Portfolio	$	114,078,159	$	101,872,757

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING DATA -continued


	As of June 30,
Key Servicing Portfolio Metrics (end of period):	2021		2020
Custodial escrow account balance (in billions)	$	3.0	$	2.3
Weighted-average servicing fee rate (basis points)		24.5		23.3
Weighted-average remaining servicing portfolio term (years)		9.2		9.5

The following tables present WDIP’s AUM as of June 30, 2021 and 2020:



	As of June 30, 2021
	Unfunded				Funded
Components of WDIP assets under management (in thousands)	Commitments				Investments				Total
Fund III	$		37,781		$		83,471		$		121,252
Fund IV			88,827				111,616				200,443
Fund V			232,560				39,256				271,816
Fund VI			27,655				—				27,655
Separate accounts			—				550,879				550,879
Total assets under management	$		386,823		$		785,222		$		1,172,045


		As of June 30, 2020
		Unfunded				Funded
Components of WDIP assets under management (in thousands)		Commitments				Investments				Total
Fund III		$		79,267		$		100,059		$		179,326
Fund IV				165,294				141,087				306,381
Fund V				194,753				7,342				202,095
Separate accounts				—				501,604				501,604
Total assets under management		$		439,314		$		750,092		$		1,189,406

(1)	Brokered transactions for life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other capital sources.

(2)

For the three months ended June 30, 2021, includes $206.5 million from the Interim Program JV, $95.7 million from the Interim Loan Program, and $16.0 million from WDIP separate accounts. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, includes $351.0 million from the Interim Program JV, $129.5 million from the Interim Loan Program and $16.0 million from WDIP separate accounts. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, includes $14.1 million from WDIP separate accounts. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, includes $86.2 million from the Interim Program JV and $35.8 million from WDIP separate accounts.

(3)	This is a non-GAAP financial measure. For more information on adjusted EBITDA, refer to the section below titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

(4)	Excludes the income and debt financing volume from Principal Lending and Investing.

(5)	The fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, net of any guaranty obligations retained. Excludes the income and debt financing volume from Principal Lending and Investing.

(6)	The fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, net of any guaranty obligations retained, as a percentage of Agency volume.

(7)	Brokered loans serviced primarily for life insurance companies.

(8)	Consists of interim loans not managed for the Interim Program JV.

(9)

As of June 30, 2021, includes $629.5 million of Interim Program JV managed loans and WDIP assets under management of $1.2 billion. As of June 30, 2020, includes $624.1 million of Interim Program JV managed loans, $71.1 million of loans serviced directly for the Interim Program JV partner, and WDIP assets under management of $1.2 billion.

Table of Contents

The following tables present a period-to-period comparison of our financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

FINANCIAL RESULTS – THREE MONTHS


	For the three months ended
	June 30,				Dollar		Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2021		2020		Change		Change
Revenues
Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net	$	107,472	$	77,907	$	29,565	38	%
Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net		61,849		90,369		(28,520)	(32)
Servicing fees		69,052		56,862		12,190	21
Property sales broker fees		22,454		3,561		18,893	531
Net warehouse interest income		4,630		9,401		(4,771)	(51)
Escrow earnings and other interest income		1,823		2,671		(848)	(32)
Other revenues		14,131		12,054		2,077	17
Total revenues	$	281,411	$	252,825	$	28,586	11

Expenses
Personnel	$	141,421	$	106,920	$	34,501	32	%
Amortization and depreciation		48,510		42,317		6,193	15
Provision (benefit) for credit losses		(4,326)		4,903		(9,229)	(188)
Interest expense on corporate debt		1,760		2,078		(318)	(15)
Other operating expenses		19,748		13,069		6,679	51
Total expenses	$	207,113	$	169,287	$	37,826	22
Income from operations	$	74,298	$	83,538	$	(9,240)	(11)
Income tax expense		18,240		21,479		(3,239)	(15)
Net income	$	56,058	$	62,059	$	(6,001)	(10)

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL RESULTS – SIX MONTHS


	For the six months ended
	June 30,				Dollar		Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2021		2020		Change		Change
Revenues
Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net	$	183,351	$	154,280	$	29,071	19	%
Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net		119,784		158,369		(38,585)	(24)
Servicing fees		135,030		112,296		22,734	20
Property sales broker fees		31,496		13,173		18,323	139
Net warehouse interest income		9,185		14,896		(5,711)	(38)
Escrow earnings and other interest income		3,940		13,414		(9,474)	(71)
Other revenues		22,913		20,554		2,359	11
Total revenues	$	505,699	$	486,982	$	18,717	4

Expenses
Personnel	$	237,636	$	196,445	$	41,191	21	%
Amortization and depreciation		95,381		82,079		13,302	16
Provision (benefit) for credit losses		(15,646)		28,546		(44,192)	(155)
Interest expense on corporate debt		3,525		4,938		(1,413)	(29)
Other operating expenses		37,335		31,159		6,176	20
Total expenses	$	358,231	$	343,167	$	15,064	4
Income from operations	$	147,468	$	143,815	$	3,653	3
Income tax expense		33,358		34,151		(793)	(2)
Net income before noncontrolling interests	$	114,110	$	109,664	$	4,446	4
Less: net loss from noncontrolling interests		—		(224)		224	(100)
Walker & Dunlop net income	$	114,110	$	109,888	$	4,222	4

Overview

Three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to three months ended June 30, 2020

The increase in revenues was driven by increases in loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”), servicing fees, and property sales broker fees, partially offset by decreases in fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net (“MSR Income”) and net warehouse interest income. The increase in origination fees was primarily related to an overall increase in debt financing volume, particularly in our brokered debt financing volume. Servicing fees increased largely from an increase in the average servicing portfolio outstanding. The increase in property sales broker fees was a result of an increase in property sales volume. MSR Income decreased as a result of a decrease in Agency debt financing volume. Net warehouse interest income decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average balance outstanding for both loans held for sale (“LHFS”) and loans held for investment (“LHFI”).

The increase in expenses was largely attributable to increases in personnel expenses, amortization and depreciation, and other operating expenses, partially offset by a change in provision (benefit) for credit losses. The increase in personnel expenses was primarily a result of an increase in commission costs due to an increase in total transaction volume and salaries and benefits costs driven by an increase in the average headcount. Amortization and depreciation expense increased due to an increase in the average MSR balance. Other operating expenses increased largely as a result of the overall growth of the Company over the past year. The change to a benefit for credit losses in 2021 from a provision for credit losses in 2020 was driven by improvements in the forecasted unemployment rate, resulting in a decrease in our CECL reserves.

Six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to six months ended June 30, 2020

The increase in revenues was driven by increases in origination fees, servicing fees, and property sales broker fees, partially offset by decreases in MSR Income, net warehouse interest income, and escrow earnings and other interest income. The increase in origination fees was primarily related to an overall increase in debt financing volume, particularly in our brokered and HUD loan origination volumes. Servicing fees increased largely from an increase in the average servicing portfolio outstanding. The increase in property sales broker fees was a result of

Table of Contents

the increase in property sales volume. MSR Income decreased as a result of a decrease in Agency debt financing volume. Net warehouse interest income decreased due to decreases in the average balances and net spreads for both LHFS and LHFI. Escrow earnings and other interest income decreased largely due to a substantial decrease in the average earnings rate.

The increase in expenses was mainly driven by increases in personnel expenses, amortization and depreciation, and other operating expenses, partially offset by a change in provision (benefit) for credit losses. The increase in personnel expenses was primarily a result of an increase in commission costs due to an increase in total transaction volume and salaries and benefits costs due primarily to an increase in the average headcount. Amortization and depreciation expense increased due to an increase in the average MSR balance. Other operating expenses increased as a result of the overall growth of the Company over the past year. The change to a benefit for credit losses in 2021 from a provision for credit losses in 2020 was driven by improvements in the forecasted unemployment rate, resulting in a decrease in our CECL reserve.

Revenues

Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net. The following tables provide additional information that helps explain changes in origination fees and MSR Income period over period:


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
Debt Financing Volume by Product Type	2021		2020		2021		2020
Fannie Mae	19	%	41	%	19	%	43	%
Freddie Mac	10		26		11		17
Ginnie Mae ̶ HUD	7		10		7		6
Brokered	61		23		60		33
Principal Lending and Investing	3		—		3		1


	For the three months ended					For the six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
Mortgage Banking Details (dollars in thousands)	2021			2020		2021		2020
Origination Fees	$	107,472		$	77,907	$	183,351	$	154,280
Dollar Change	$	29,565				$	29,071
Percentage Change		38	%				19
MSR Income ⁽¹⁾	$	61,849		$	90,369	$	119,784	$	158,369
Dollar Change	$	(28,520)				$	(38,585)
Percentage Change		(32)	%				(24)
Origination Fee Rate ⁽²⁾ (basis points)		107			117		104		95
Basis Point Change		(10)					9
Percentage Change		(9)	%				9
MSR Rate ⁽³⁾ (basis points)		63			136		69		98
Basis Point Change		(73)					(29)
Percentage Change		(54)	%				(30)
Agency MSR Rate ⁽⁴⁾ (basis points)		172			175		177		148
Basis Point Change		(3)					29
Percentage Change		(2)	%				20

(1)	The fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, net of any guaranty obligations retained.

(2)	Origination fees as a percentage of total mortgage banking volume.

(3)	MSR Income as a percentage of total debt financing volume, excluding the income and debt financing volume from principal lending and investing.

(4)	MSR Income as a percentage of Agency debt financing volume.

For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the increase in origination fees was driven by the significant increase in overall debt financing volume, particularly by substantial growth in our brokered debt financing volume, which grew by 320% from the three months ended June 30, 2020. The increase in origination fees due to the increase in volume was partially offset by a decrease in the origination fee rate resulting from the shift in transaction mix from 77% Agency loans in 2020 to 36% Agency loans in 2021. We typically earn higher origination fees on Agency loans than brokered loans.

Table of Contents

MSR Income decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2021, primarily as a result of a 36% decrease in Agency debt financing volume.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the increase in origination fees was driven by the significant increase in overall debt financing, driven by the growth in our brokered debt financing volume noted above, which grew by 93% from the six months ended June 30, 2020. Additionally, the origination fee rate increased from 2020 to 2021 as during the first quarter of 2020, we originated a $2.1 billion portfolio of Fannie Mae loans that had a very low origination fee rate, with no comparable activity in 2021.

MSR Income declined for the six months ended June 30, 2021, as a result of a 44% decrease in Agency debt financing volumes partially offset by an increase in the Agency MSR Rate. The Agency MSR Rate increased year over year due to the large portfolio discussed above, which had a very low servicing fee.

See the “Overview of Current Business Environment” section above for a detailed discussion of the factors driving the changes in debt financing volumes.

Servicing Fees. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the increase was primarily attributable to increases in the average servicing portfolio period over period as shown below primarily due to higher loan originations and relatively few payoffs over the last 12 months, coupled with increases in the servicing portfolio’s average servicing fee rates as shown below. The increases in the average servicing fee are the result of the large volume of Fannie Mae debt financing volume with high servicing fees over the past year.


	For the three months ended					For the six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
Servicing Fees Details (dollars in thousands)	2021			2020		2021			2020
Average Servicing Portfolio	$	110,949,226		$	97,997,335	$	109,736,658		$	96,132,240
Dollar Change		12,951,891					13,604,418
Percentage Change		13	%				14	%
Average Servicing Fee (basis points)		24.4			23.2		24.3			23.2
Basis Point Change		1.2					1.1
Percentage Change		5.2	%				4.7	%

Property sales broker fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the increase in property sales broker fees was driven by significant increases in the property sales volume year over year. See the “Overview of Current Business Environment” section above for a detailed discussion of the factors driving the changes in property sales volumes.

Net Warehouse Interest Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the decreases in net warehouse interest income were the result of decreases in net warehouse interest income from both LHFS and LHFI. The decrease in net warehouse interest income from LHFS for the three months ended June 30, 2021 was due to a 59% decrease in the average outstanding balance due to the lower volume of Agency loans in 2021 than 2020, partially offset by a 12% increase in the net spreads, as the short-term interest rates upon which we incur interest expense decreased at a faster rate than the mortgage rates upon which we earn interest income. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the decrease in net warehouse interest income from LHFS was due to a 25% decrease in the average outstanding balance due to the lower volume of Agency loans in 2021 than 2020, coupled with a 9% decrease in net spreads, as the mortgage rates upon which we earn interest income increased at a slower rate than the short-term interest rates upon which we incur interest expense.

The decrease in interest income from LHFI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 was primarily due to decreases in the average outstanding balance coupled with decreases in the net spread. The average outstanding balance decreased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 due to low origination activity during the year ended December 31, 2020, as the market for interim loans was interrupted due to the pandemic. The payoffs we had in 2020 were not fully replaced with new originations, resulting in a lower starting balance in 2021 than in 2020. We have seen an increase in our interim loan volume in 2021, particularly during the second quarter. The decreases in net spreads for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 were the result of having a larger balance of LHFI funded with corporate cash in 2020 than 2021.

Table of Contents


	For the three months ended					For the six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
Net Warehouse Interest Income Details (dollars in thousands)	2021			2020		2021			2020
Average LHFS Outstanding Balance	$	1,057,876		$	2,599,844	$	1,288,592		$	1,716,444
Dollar Change	$	(1,541,968)				$	(427,852)
Percentage Change		(59)	%				(25)	%
LHFS Net Spread (basis points)		109			97		83			91
Basis Point Change		12					(8)
Percentage Change		12	%				(9)	%
Average LHFI Outstanding Balance	$	262,309		$	362,345	$	280,171		$	401,532
Dollar Change	$	(100,036)				$	(121,361)
Percentage Change		(28)	%				(30)	%
LHFI Net Spread (basis points)		266			341		274			353
Basis Point Change		(75)					(79)
Percentage Change		(22)	%				(22)	%

Escrow Earnings and Other Interest Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the decrease was primarily due to a significant decrease in average earnings rate on our escrow accounts resulting from a decrease in short-term interest rates in the broader market, slightly offset by an increase in the average balance of escrow accounts due to an increase in the average servicing portfolio.

Expenses

Personnel. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the increase was primarily the result of a $27.4 million increase in commission costs due to higher origination fees and property sales revenues, a $5.4 million increase in salaries and benefits due to an increase in the average headcount to support our growth efforts, and a $2.2 million increase in stock compensation expense. The average headcount increased from 860 in 2020 to 1027 in 2021. Stock compensation increased due to higher expense associated with a stock grant provided to the vast majority of our non-executive employee base in the fourth quarter of 2020.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the increase was primarily the result of a $24.9 million increase in commission costs due to higher origination fees and property sales revenues, an $11.5 million increase in salaries and benefits due to an increase in average headcount to support our growth efforts, and a $4.9 million increase in stock compensation expense. The average headcount increased from 848 for the first six months of 2020 to 999 for the first six months of 2021. Stock compensation increased due to higher expense associated with our performance share plans and a stock grant provided to the vast majority of our non-executive employee base in the fourth quarter of 2020. The expense for our performance share plans was unusually low during 2020 due to the uncertainty associated with the pandemic.

Amortization and Depreciation. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, the increase was primarily attributed to loan origination activity and the resulting growth in the average MSR balance. Over the past 12 months, we have added $137.2 million of MSRs, net of amortization and write offs due to prepayment.

Provision (Benefit) for Credit Losses. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the change in the provision (benefit) for credit losses was due to improvements in the forecasted unemployment rate and sustained strength in occupancy and other multifamily operating fundamentals. We lowered our forecast-period loss rate for our June 30, 2021 CECL reserve calculation to three basis points from four basis points as of March 31, 2021, resulting in a benefit for credit losses for the three months ended June 30, 2021. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, the provision for credit losses was primarily attributable to the increase in our at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio and the resulting increase in the CECL reserve as we did not change the forecasted loss rate from March 31, 2020 to June 30, 2020.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the change in the provision (benefit) for credit losses was due to the improvements in the forecasted unemployment rate and sustained strength in multifamily operating fundamentals noted above. In the first half of 2020, we increased our forecasted loss rate for our June 30, 2020 CECL reserve calculation to seven basis points from one basis point upon implementation at January 1, 2020 as a result of the expected negative economic impacts of the pandemic, which resulted in a significant provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2020. With the economic improvements noted above, we lowered our forecast-period loss rate for our June 30, 2021 CECL reserve calculation to three basis points from six basis points at December 31, 2020, resulting in a significant benefit for credit losses in 2021.

Table of Contents

We have not experienced any defaults and minimal delinquencies in our at-risk servicing portfolio since the onset of the pandemic.

Other Operating Expenses. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2021 primarily stemmed from increased professional fees due to our growth initiatives, travel costs as our bankers and brokers resumed traveling for in person meetings, and other expenses.

The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2021 was largely attributable to increased technology costs and growth efforts, professional fees due to our growth initiatives, and other operating expenses.

Income Tax Expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the decrease in income tax expense relates primarily to the 11% decrease in income from operations and a $1.1 million increase in realizable excess tax benefits recognized year over year due to a substantial increase in the price at which restricted stock vested and options were exercised.

For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the decrease in income tax expense relates primarily to a $2.0 million increase in realizable excess tax benefits recognized year over year due to a substantial increase in the number of shares of restricted stock vested and options exercised and an increase in the price at which these awards vested or were exercised, partially offset by the 3% increase in income from operations.

We do not expect our annual estimated effective tax rate to differ significantly from the 26.2% rate estimated for the three months ended June 30, 2021 as we do not have significant permanent differences. Accordingly, we expect an estimated effective tax rate of between approximately 25.5% and 26.5% for the remainder of the year. The effective tax rate decreased slightly year over year from 23.7% in 2020 to 22.6% in 2021 due to the increase in realizable excess tax benefits, partially offset by a slightly higher estimated annual effective tax rate in 2021 compared to 2020. The increase in the estimated annual effective tax rate was due to an increase in the value of executive restricted and performance shares that vested in 2021 compared to 2020.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, readers should use adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, interest expense on our term loan facility, and amortization and depreciation, adjusted for provision for credit losses net of write-offs, stock-based incentive compensation charges, and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for adjusted EBITDA may also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges that are used to determine compliance with financial covenants.

We use adjusted EBITDA to evaluate the operating performance of our business, for comparison with forecasts and strategic plans, and for benchmarking performance externally against competitors. We believe that this non-GAAP measure, when read in conjunction with our GAAP financials, provides useful information to investors by offering:

●

the ability to make more meaningful period-to-period comparisons of our ongoing operating results;

●

the ability to better identify trends in our underlying business and perform related trend analyses; and

●

a better understanding of how management plans and measures our underlying business.

We believe that adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and that adjusted EBITDA should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with net income. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:

Table of Contents

ADJUSTED FINANCIAL METRIC RECONCILIATION TO GAAP


	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(in thousands)	2021		2020		2021		2020
Reconciliation of Walker & Dunlop Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA
Walker & Dunlop Net Income	$	56,058	$	62,059	$	114,110	$	109,888
Income tax expense		18,240		21,479		33,358		34,151
Interest expense on corporate debt		1,760		2,078		3,525		4,938
Amortization and depreciation		48,510		42,317		95,381		82,079
Provision (benefit) for credit losses		(4,326)		4,903		(15,646)		28,546
Net write-offs		—		—		—		—
Stock compensation expense		8,121		5,927		16,237		11,289
Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net		(61,849)		(90,369)		(119,784)		(158,369)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	66,514	$	48,394	$	127,181	$	112,522

The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of the components of adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

ADJUSTED EBITDA – THREE MONTHS


	For the three months ended
	June 30,				Dollar		Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2021		2020		Change		Change
Origination fees	$	107,472	$	77,907	$	29,565	38	%
Servicing fees		69,052		56,862		12,190	21
Property sales broker fees		22,454		3,561		18,893	531
Net warehouse interest income		4,630		9,401		(4,771)	(51)
Escrow earnings and other interest income		1,823		2,671		(848)	(32)
Other revenues		14,131		12,054		2,077	17
Personnel		(133,300)		(100,993)		(32,307)	32
Net write-offs		—		—		—	N/A
Other operating expenses		(19,748)		(13,069)		(6,679)	51
Adjusted EBITDA	$	66,514	$	48,394	$	18,120	37

ADJUSTED EBITDA – SIX MONTHS


	For the six months ended
	June 30,				Dollar		Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2021		2020		Change		Change
Origination fees	$	183,351	$	154,280	$	29,071	19	%
Servicing fees		135,030		112,296		22,734	20
Property sales broker fees		31,496		13,173		18,323	139
Net warehouse interest income		9,185		14,896		(5,711)	(38)
Escrow earnings and other interest income		3,940		13,414		(9,474)	(71)
Other revenues		22,913		20,778		2,135	10
Personnel		(221,399)		(185,156)		(36,243)	20
Net write-offs		—		—		—	N/A
Other operating expenses		(37,335)		(31,159)		(6,176)	20
Adjusted EBITDA	$	127,181	$	112,522	$	14,659	13

Table of Contents

Three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to three and six months ended June 30, 2020

Origination fees increased due to significant increases in overall debt financing volumes. Servicing fees increased due to increases in the average servicing portfolio period over period as a result of the substantial loan originations and relatively few payoffs over the last 12 months and increases in the average servicing fee. Property sales broker fees increased as a result of the increases in property sales volumes. Net warehouse interest income decreased primarily due to decreases in the average outstanding balances. Escrow earnings and other interest income decreased primarily as a result of declines in the average earnings rates. The increases in personnel expense were primarily due to increased commission costs due to the increases in total transaction volumes and salaries and benefits resulting from increases in average headcount. Other operating expenses increased as a result of the overall growth of the Company over the past year.

Financial Condition

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash flows from operating activities are generated from loan sales, servicing fees, escrow earnings, net warehouse interest income, property sales broker fees, and other income, net of loan originations and operating costs. Our cash flows from operations are impacted by the fees generated by our loan originations, the timing of loan closings, and the period of time loans are held for sale in the warehouse loan facility prior to delivery to the investor.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

We usually lease facilities and equipment for our operations. Our cash flows from investing activities also include the funding and repayment of loans held for investment, contributions to and distributions from joint ventures, and the purchase of AFS securities pledged to Fannie Mae. We opportunistically invest cash for acquisitions and MSR portfolio purchases.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

We use our warehouse loan facilities and, when necessary, our corporate cash to fund loan closings. We believe that our current warehouse loan facilities are adequate to meet our increasing loan origination needs. Historically, we have used a combination of long-term debt and cash flows from operations to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares, pay cash dividends, and fund a portion of loans held for investment.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of the significant components of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.

Table of Contents

SIGNIFICANT COMPONENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	For the six months ended June 30,				Dollar		Percentage
(dollars in thousands)	2021		2020		Change		Change
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	759,342	$	(822,643)	$	1,581,985	(192)	%
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		75,411		73,971		1,440	2
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(802,999)		903,974		(1,706,973)	(189)
Total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period ("Total cash")		389,756		291,868		97,888	34

Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
Net receipt (use) of cash for loan origination activity	$	731,775	$	(900,150)	$	1,631,925	(181)	%
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, excluding loan origination activity		27,567		77,507		(49,940)	(64)

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Purchases of pledged AFS securities	$	(2,000)	$	(14,155)	$	12,155	(86)	%
Proceeds from the prepayment/sale of pledged AFS securities		22,092		4,739		17,353	366
Acquisitions, net of cash received		(10,507)		(46,784)		36,277	(78)
Net payoff of (investment in) loans held for investment		89,566		139,030		(49,464)	(36)
Net distributions from (investments in) joint ventures	$	(16,692)	$	(6,470)	$	(10,222)	158	%

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
Borrowings (repayments) of warehouse notes payable, net	$	(744,281)	$	1,009,302	$	(1,753,583)	(174)	%
Borrowings of interim warehouse notes payable		84,766		33,127		51,639	156
Repayments of interim warehouse notes payable		(34,174)		(84,959)		50,785	(60)
Repurchase of common stock		(14,190)		(27,142)		12,952	(48)
Repayment of secured borrowings		(73,312)		—		(73,312)	N/A
Cash dividends paid		(32,122)		(22,641)		(9,481)	42

The change in cash flows from operating activities was driven primarily by loans originated and sold. Such loans are held for short periods of time, generally less than 60 days, and impact cash flows presented as of a point in time. The increase in cash flows received in loan origination activities is primarily attributable to sales of loans held for sale outpacing originations by $731.8 million during the first half of 2021 (net receipt of cash) compared to originations outpacing sales of loans held for sale by $900.2 million during the first half of 2020 (net use of cash). Our Agency debt financing activity decreased year over year, which resulted in less cash used in originations during the first six months of 2021. Excluding cash received or used for the origination and sale of loans, cash flows provided by operations were $27.6 million in 2021, down from $77.5 million in 2020. The decrease was largely due to an increase in cash used to pay down other liabilities of $82.1 million, partially offset by a $34.5 million change in the adjustment for the change in the fair value of premiums and origination fees.

The slight change in cash provided by investing activities is primarily attributable to an increase in cash provided by prepayment and sale of pledged AFS securities, a decrease in cash used for acquisitions, and a decrease in purchases of AFS securities, almost entirely offset by a decrease in net payoff of loans held for investment and an increase in net investment in joint ventures.

The change to cash used in financing activities from cash provided by financing activity was primarily attributable to the change to net warehouse repayments in 2021 from net warehouse borrowings in 2020, the repayment of our secured borrowings, and an increase in cash dividends paid, partially offset by net borrowings of interim warehouse notes payable and a decrease in cash paid for stock repurchases. The change to net repayments of warehouse notes payable during 2021 was largely due to the increase in net cash received for loan origination activity, resulting in net repayments of the related warehouse notes payables. The repayment of secured borrowings was the result of the secured borrowing being paid off in the second quarter of 2021, a unique transaction. Cash dividends paid increased as a result of the increase in our dividend to $0.50 per share in 2021 compared to $0.36 per share in 2020. Net repayments of interim warehouse notes payable in 2020 changed to net borrowings of interim warehouse notes payable in 2021 due to a decrease in net payoffs of loans held for investment mentioned above. The decrease in cash paid for repurchases of common stock was related to repurchases under approved stock repurchase programs. In 2021, we did not repurchase any shares under approved repurchase programs, while in 2020 we repurchased $10.2 million of shares under such programs.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Uses of Liquidity, Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our significant recurring cash flow requirements consist of liquidity to (i) fund loans held for sale; (ii) fund loans held for investment under the Interim Loan Program; (iii) pay cash dividends; (iv) fund our portion of the equity necessary for the operations of the Interim Program JV, the Appraisal JV, and other equity-method investments; (v) meet working capital needs to support our day-to-day operations, including debt service payments, servicing advances and payments for salaries, commissions, and income taxes; and (vi) meet working capital needs to satisfy collateral requirements for our Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations and to meet the operational liquidity requirements of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae, and our warehouse facility lenders.

Fannie Mae has established benchmark standards for capital adequacy and reserves the right to terminate our servicing authority for all or some of the portfolio if, at any time, it determines that our financial condition is not adequate to support our obligations under the DUS agreement. We are required to maintain acceptable net worth as defined in the standards, and we satisfied the requirements as of June 30, 2021. The net worth requirement is derived primarily from unpaid balances on Fannie Mae loans and the level of risk-sharing. As of June 30, 2021, the net worth requirement was $245.4 million, and our net worth was $1.1 billion, as measured at our wholly owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC. As of June 30, 2021, we were required to maintain at least $48.7 million of liquid assets to meet our operational liquidity requirements for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae and our warehouse facility lenders. As of June 30, 2021, we had operational liquidity of $359.3 million, as measured at our wholly owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC.

We paid a cash dividend of $0.50 per share in each of the first and second quarters of 2021, which is 39% higher than the quarterly dividend paid in each of the first and second quarters of 2020. On August 4, 2021, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.50 per share for the third quarter of 2021. The dividend will be paid on September 3, 2021 to all holders of record of the Company’s restricted and unrestricted common stock as of August 19, 2021.

Over the past three years, we have returned $206.6 million to investors in the form of the repurchase of 1.6 million shares of our common stock under share repurchase programs for a cost of $76.1 million and cash dividend payments of $130.5 million. Additionally, we have invested $120.3 million in acquisitions. On occasion, we may use cash to fully fund some loans held for investment or loans held for sale instead of using our warehouse lines. As of June 30, 2021, we used corporate cash to fully fund loans held for investment with an unpaid principal balance of $14.7 million and loans held for sale of $14.2 million. We continually seek opportunities to complete additional acquisitions if we believe the economics are favorable.

In February 2021, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75 million of shares of our common stock over a 12-month period beginning February 12, 2021. Through June 30, 2021 we have not repurchased any shares under the 2021 repurchase program and have $75.0 million of remaining capacity under that program.

Historically, our cash flows from operations and warehouse facilities have been sufficient to enable us to meet our short-term liquidity needs and other funding requirements. We believe that cash flows from operations will continue to be sufficient for us to meet our current obligations for the foreseeable future.

Restricted Cash and Pledged Securities

Restricted cash consists primarily of good faith deposits held on behalf of borrowers between the time we enter into a loan commitment with the borrower and the investor purchases the loan. We are generally required to share the risk of any losses associated with loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, our only off-balance sheet arrangement. We are required to secure this obligation by assigning collateral to Fannie Mae. We meet this obligation by assigning pledged securities to Fannie Mae. The amount of collateral required by Fannie Mae is a formulaic calculation at the loan level and considers the balance of the loan, the risk level of the loan, the age of the loan, and the level of risk-sharing. Fannie Mae requires collateral for Tier 2 loans of 75 basis points, which is funded over a 48-month period that begins upon delivery of the loan to Fannie Mae. Collateral held in the form of money market funds holding U.S. Treasuries is discounted 5%, and Agency MBS are discounted 4% for purposes of calculating compliance with the collateral requirements. As of June 30, 2021, we held substantially all of our restricted liquidity in Agency MBS in the aggregate amount of $99.2 million. Additionally, the majority of the loans for which we have risk-sharing are Tier 2 loans. We fund any growth in our Fannie Mae required operational liquidity and collateral requirements from our working capital.

Table of Contents

We are in compliance with the June 30, 2021 collateral requirements as outlined above. As of June 30, 2021, reserve requirements for the June 30, 2021 DUS loan portfolio will require us to fund $66.9 million in additional restricted liquidity over the next 48 months, assuming no further principal paydowns, prepayments, or defaults within our at-risk portfolio. Fannie Mae has assessed the DUS Capital Standards in the past and may make changes to these standards in the future. We generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to meet these capital standards and do not expect any future changes to have a material impact on our future operations; however, any future changes to collateral requirements may adversely impact our available cash.

Under the provisions of the DUS agreement, we must also maintain a certain level of liquid assets referred to as the operational and unrestricted portions of the required reserves each year. We satisfied these requirements as of June 30, 2021.

Sources of Liquidity: Warehouse Facilities

The following table provides information related to our warehouse facilities as of June 30, 2021.


	June 30, 2021
(dollars in thousands)	Committed		Uncommitted		Total Facility		Outstanding
Facility⁽¹⁾	Amount		Amount		Capacity		Balance		Interest rate⁽²⁾
Agency Warehouse Facility #1	$	425,000	$	—	$	425,000	$	347,747	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #2		700,000		300,000		1,000,000		390,370	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #3		600,000		265,000		865,000		125,951	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #4		350,000		—		350,000		246,769	30-day LIBOR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #5		—		1,000,000		1,000,000		276,874	30-day LIBOR plus 1.45%
Agency Warehouse Facility #6		150,000	$	100,000	$	250,000	$	70,913	30-day LIBOR plus 1.40%
Total National Bank Agency Warehouse Facilities		2,225,000		1,665,000		3,890,000		1,458,624
Fannie Mae repurchase agreement, uncommitted line and open maturity	$	—	$	1,500,000	$	1,500,000	$	180,953
Total Agency Warehouse Facilities		2,225,000		3,165,000		5,390,000		1,639,577
Interim Warehouse Facility #1	$	135,000	$	—	$	135,000	$	71,572	30-day LIBOR plus 1.90%
Interim Warehouse Facility #2		100,000		—		100,000		34,000	30-day LIBOR plus 1.65% to 2.00%
Interim Warehouse Facility #3		75,000		75,000		150,000		59,453	30-day LIBOR plus 1.75% to 3.25%
Interim Warehouse Facility #4		19,810		—		19,810		19,810	30-day LIBOR plus 3.00%
Total National Bank Interim Warehouse Facilities		329,810		75,000		404,810		184,835
Total warehouse facilities	$	2,554,810	$	3,240,000	$	5,794,810	$	1,824,412

(1)	Agency Warehouse Facilities, including the Fannie Mae repurchase agreement are used to fund loans held for sale, while Interim Warehouse Facilities are used to fund loans held for investment.

(2)	Interest rate presented does not include the effect of interest rate floors.

Agency Warehouse Facilities

As of June 30, 2021, we had six warehouse lines of credit in the aggregate amount of $3.9 billion with certain national banks and a $1.5 billion uncommitted facility with Fannie Mae (collectively, the “Agency Warehouse Facilities”) that we use to fund substantially all of our loan originations. The six warehouse facilities are revolving commitments we expect to renew annually (consistent with industry practice), and the Fannie Mae facility is provided on an uncommitted basis without a specific maturity date. Our ability to originate mortgage loans depends upon our ability to secure and maintain these types of short-term financing agreements on acceptable terms.

Agency Warehouse Facility #1:

We have a warehousing credit and security agreement with a national bank for a $425.0 million committed warehouse line that is scheduled to mature on October 25, 2021. The agreement provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance and borrowings under this line bear interest at the 30-day London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 130 basis points. During the second quarter of 2021, we executed an amendment that decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero from 25 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement in 2021.

Table of Contents

Agency Warehouse Facility #2:

We have a warehousing credit and security agreement with a national bank for a $700.0 million committed warehouse line that is scheduled to mature on April 14, 2022. The committed warehouse facility provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and borrowings under this line bear interest at the 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points. In addition to the committed borrowing capacity, the agreement provides $300.0 million of uncommitted borrowing capacity that bears interest at the same rate as the committed facility. During the second quarter of 2021, we executed amendments that extended the maturity date thereunder until April 14, 2022 and decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Agency Warehouse Facility #3:

We have a $600.0 million committed warehouse credit and security agreement with a national bank that is scheduled to mature on May 14, 2022. The committed warehouse facility provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and the borrowings under the warehouse agreement bear interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points. During the second quarter of 2021, we executed amendments that extended the maturity date to May 14, 2022 for the committed borrowing capacity. Additionally, the amendments increased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 115 basis points and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero basis points from 50 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Agency Warehouse Facility #4:

We have a $350.0 million committed warehouse credit and security agreement with a national bank that is scheduled to mature on June 22, 2022. The warehouse facility provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, FHA, and defaulted HUD and FHA loans and has a sublimit of $75.0 million to fund defaulted HUD and FHA loans. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and the borrowings under the warehouse agreement bear interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points. During the second quarter of 2021, we executed an amendment that extended the maturity date thereunder until June 22, 2022, decreased the borrowing rate to 30-day LIBOR plus 130 basis points from 30-day LIBOR plus 140 basis points, and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to five basis points from 25 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Agency Warehouse Facility #5:

We have a master repurchase agreement with a national bank for a $1.0 billion uncommitted advance credit facility that is scheduled to mature on August 23, 2021. The facility provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and the borrowings under the repurchase agreement bear interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 145 basis points. No material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Agency Warehouse Facility #6:

During the first quarter of 2021, we entered into an agreement with a national bank to establish Agency Warehouse Facility #6. The facility has a $150.0 million committed borrowing capacity and provides us with the ability to fund Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and FHA loans under the facility. Advances are made at 100% of the loan balance, and the borrowings under the warehouse agreement bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 140 basis points. The agreement also provides $100.0 million of uncommitted borrowing capacity that bears interest at the same rate as the committed facility. No material modifications were made to the agreement during 2021.

The negative and financial covenants of the warehouse agreement substantially conform to those of the warehouse agreement for Agency Warehouse Facility #1, as described in our 2020 Form 10-K.

Uncommitted Agency Warehouse Facility:

We have a $1.5 billion uncommitted facility with Fannie Mae under its ASAP funding program. After approval of certain loan documents, Fannie Mae will fund loans after closing, and the advances are used to repay the primary warehouse line. Fannie Mae will advance 99% of the loan balance. There is no expiration date for this facility. The uncommitted facility has no specific negative or financial covenants.

Table of Contents

Interim Warehouse Facilities

To assist in funding loans held for investment under the Interim Loan Program, we have four warehouse facilities with certain national banks in the aggregate amount of $404.8 million as of June 30, 2021 (“Interim Warehouse Facilities”). Consistent with industry practice, three of these facilities are revolving commitments we expect to renew annually or bi-annually, and one is a commitment that matures according to the maturity date of the underlying loan it finances. Our ability to originate loans held for investment depends upon our ability to secure and maintain these types of short-term financings on acceptable terms.

Interim Warehouse Facility #1:

We have a $135.0 million committed warehouse line agreement that is scheduled to mature on May 14, 2022. The facility provides us with the ability to fund first mortgage loans on multifamily real estate properties for periods of up to three years, using available cash in combination with advances under the facility. Borrowings under the facility are full recourse to the Company and bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 190 basis points. Repayments under the credit agreement are interest-only, with principal repayments made upon the earlier of the refinancing of an underlying mortgage or the maturity of an advance under the credit agreement. During the second quarter of 2021, we executed amendments that extended the maturity date to May 14, 2022 and decreased the 30-day LIBOR floor to zero basis points from 50 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Interim Warehouse Facility #2:

We have a $100.0 million committed warehouse line agreement that is scheduled to mature on December 13, 2021. The agreement provides us with the ability to fund first mortgage loans on multifamily real estate properties for periods of up to three years, using available cash in combination with advances under the facility. Borrowings under the facility are full recourse to the Company. All borrowings originally bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 165 to 200 basis points (“the spread”). The spread varies according to the type of asset the borrowing finances. The lender retains a first priority security interest in all mortgages funded by such advances on a cross-collateralized basis. Repayments under the credit agreement are interest-only, with principal repayments made upon the earlier of the refinancing of an underlying mortgage or the maturity of an advance under the credit agreement. No material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Interim Warehouse Facility #3:

We have a $75.0 million repurchase agreement with a national bank that is scheduled to mature on December 20, 2021. The agreement provides us with the ability to fund first mortgage loans on multifamily real estate properties for periods of up to three years, using available cash in combination with advances under the facility. Borrowings under the facility are full recourse to the Company. The borrowings under the agreement bear interest at a rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 175 to 325 basis points. The spread varies according to the type of asset the borrowing finances. Repayments under the credit agreement are interest-only, with principal repayments made upon the earlier of the refinancing of an underlying mortgage or the maturity of an advance under the credit agreement. In addition to the committed borrowing capacity, the agreement provides $75.0 million of uncommitted borrowing capacity that bears interest at the same rate as the committed facility. No material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

Interim Warehouse Facility #4:

We have a $19.8 million committed warehouse loan and security agreement with a national bank that funds one specific loan. The agreement provides for a maturity date to coincide with the maturity date for the underlying loan. Borrowings under the facility are full recourse and bear interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points, with a floor of 450 basis points. Repayments under the credit agreement are interest-only, with principal repayments made upon the earlier of the refinancing of an underlying mortgage or the maturity of an advance under the credit agreement. The committed warehouse loan and security agreement has only two financial covenants, both of which are similar to the other Interim Warehouse Facilities. We may request additional capacity under the agreement to fund specific loans. No material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2021.

The warehouse agreements above contain cross-default provisions, such that if a default occurs under any of our warehouse agreements, generally the lenders under our other warehouse agreements could also declare a default. As of June 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all of our warehouse line covenants.

Table of Contents

We believe that the combination of our capital and warehouse facilities is adequate to meet our loan origination needs.

Note Payable

On November 7, 2018, we entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) that amended and restated our prior credit agreement and provided for a $300.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan was issued at a 0.5% discount, has a stated maturity date of November 7, 2025, and bears interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 200 basis points. At any time, we may also elect to request one or more incremental term loan commitments not to exceed $150.0 million, provided that the total indebtedness would not cause the leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to exceed 2.00 to 1.00.

We are obligated to repay the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan in consecutive quarterly installments equal to $0.7 million on the last business day of each of March, June, September, and December. The Term Loan also requires certain other prepayments in certain circumstances pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. The final principal installment of the Term Loan is required to be paid in full on November 7, 2025 (or, if earlier, the date of acceleration of the Term Loan pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement) and will be in an amount equal to the aggregate outstanding principal of the Term Loan on such date (together with all accrued interest thereon).

Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by Walker & Dunlop Multifamily, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Walker & Dunlop Capital, LLC, and W&D BE, Inc., each of which is a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (together with the Company, the “Loan Parties”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement entered into on November 7, 2018 among the Loan Parties and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the “Guarantee and Collateral Agreement”). Subject to certain exceptions and qualifications contained in the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to cause any newly created or acquired subsidiary, unless such subsidiary has been designated as an Excluded Subsidiary (as defined in the Credit Agreement) by the Company in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, to guarantee the obligations of the Company under the Credit Agreement and become a party to the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement. The Company may designate a newly created or acquired subsidiary as an Excluded Subsidiary, so long as certain conditions and requirements provided for in the Credit Agreement are met. As of June 30, 2021, the outstanding unpaid principal balance of the Term Loan was $293.3 million.

The note payable and the warehouse facilities are senior obligations of the Company. As of June 30, 2021, we were in compliance with all such covenants related to the Credit Agreement.

Table of Contents

Credit Quality and Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations

The following table sets forth certain information useful in evaluating our credit performance.


	June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2021			2020
Key Credit Metrics
Risk-sharing servicing portfolio:
Fannie Mae Full Risk	$	42,444,569		$	35,707,326
Fannie Mae Modified Risk		8,617,020			9,411,097
Freddie Mac Modified Risk		36,894			52,696
Total risk-sharing servicing portfolio	$	51,098,483		$	45,171,119

Non-risk-sharing servicing portfolio:
Fannie Mae No Risk	$	16,071		$	41,581
Freddie Mac No Risk		37,851,075			33,169,394
GNMA - HUD No Risk		9,904,246			9,749,888
Brokered		13,129,969			11,519,629
Total non-risk-sharing servicing portfolio	$	60,901,361		$	54,480,492
Total loans serviced for others	$	111,999,844		$	99,651,611
Interim loans (full risk) servicing portfolio		276,738			336,473
Total servicing portfolio unpaid principal balance	$	112,276,582		$	99,988,084

Interim Program JV Managed Loans ⁽¹⁾		629,532			695,267

At risk servicing portfolio ⁽²⁾	$	46,866,767		$	40,640,024
Maximum exposure to at risk portfolio ⁽³⁾		9,517,609			8,266,261
Defaulted loans		48,481			48,481

Defaulted loans as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio		0.10	%		0.12	%
Allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio		0.13			0.17
Allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of maximum exposure		0.63			0.84

(1)

As of June 30, 2021, this balance consists entirely of Interim Program JV managed loans. As of June 30, 2020, this balance consists of $71.1 million of loans serviced directly for the Interim Program JV partner and $624.1 million of Interim Program JV managed loans. We indirectly share in a portion of the risk of loss associated with Interim Program JV managed loans through our 15% equity ownership in the Interim Program JV. We have no exposure to risk of loss for the loans serviced directly for the Interim Program JV partner. The balance of this line is included as a component of assets under management in the Supplemental Operating Data table above.

(2)

At-risk servicing portfolio is defined as the balance of Fannie Mae DUS loans subject to the risk-sharing formula described below, as well as a small number of Freddie Mac loans on which we share in the risk of loss. Use of the at-risk portfolio provides for comparability of the full risk-sharing and modified risk-sharing loans because the provision and allowance for risk-sharing obligations are based on the at-risk balances of the associated loans. Accordingly, we have presented the key statistics as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio.

For example, a $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing has the same potential risk exposure as a $7.5 million loan with full DUS risk sharing. Accordingly, if the $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing were to default, we would view the overall loss as a percentage of the at-risk balance, or $7.5 million, to ensure comparability between all risk-sharing obligations. To date, substantially all of the risk-sharing obligations that we have settled have been from full risk-sharing loans.

(3)

Represents the maximum loss we would incur under our risk-sharing obligations if all of the loans we service, for which we retain some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement. The maximum exposure is not representative of the actual loss we would incur.

Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations are based on a tiered formula and represent substantially all of our risk-sharing activities. The risk-sharing tiers and the amount of the risk-sharing obligations we absorb under full risk-sharing are provided below. Except as described in the following paragraph, the maximum amount of risk-sharing obligations we absorb at the time of default is generally 20% of the origination unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of the loan.

Table of Contents


Risk-Sharing Losses		Percentage Absorbed by Us
First 5% of UPB at the time of loss settlement		100%
Next 20% of UPB at the time of loss settlement		25%
Losses above 25% of UPB at the time of loss settlement		10%
Maximum loss		20% of origination UPB

Fannie Mae can double or triple our risk-sharing obligation if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if a loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. We may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination, which reduces our potential risk-sharing obligation from the levels described above.

We use several techniques to manage our risk exposure under the Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing program. These techniques include maintaining a strong underwriting and approval process, evaluating and modifying our underwriting criteria given the underlying multifamily housing market fundamentals, limiting our geographic market and borrower exposures, and electing the modified risk-sharing option under the Fannie Mae DUS program.

The “Business” section of “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contains a discussion of the risk-sharing caps we have with Fannie Mae.

We regularly monitor the credit quality of all loans for which we have a risk-sharing obligation. Loans with indicators of underperforming credit are placed on a watch list, assigned a numerical risk rating based on our assessment of the relative credit weakness, and subjected to additional evaluation or loss mitigation. Indicators of underperforming credit include poor financial performance, poor physical condition, poor management, and delinquency. A collateral-based reserve is recorded when it is probable that a risk-sharing loan will foreclose or has foreclosed, and a reserve for estimated credit losses and a guaranty obligation are recorded for all other risk-sharing loans.

As a result of the onset of the pandemic and the resulting forecasts for significant unemployment rates for the remainder of 2020, we adjusted the loss rate for the forecast period CECL reserve, resulting in a total allowance for risk-sharing obligation of $69.2 million as of June 30, 2020, or 17 basis points of the at-risk balance. During the second quarter of 2021, economic conditions began to improve significantly, with reported unemployment rates and forecasts for future unemployment rates at improved rates compared to both December 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020. In response to the improving unemployment statistics, we adjusted the loss rate for the forecast period downwards as of June 30, 2021, resulting in a $15.0 million benefit for risk-sharing obligations and a decrease in the allowance for risk-sharing obligations to $60.3 million as of June 30, 2021 from $75.3 million as of December 31, 2020, or 13 basis points and 17 basis points of the at-risk balance as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.

As of June 30, 2021, and 2020, two loans with an aggregate UPB of $48.5 million in our at-risk portfolio were in default. We had a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $4.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021 compared to a provision for risk-sharing obligations of $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. For the three months ended June 30, 2021, the benefit for risk-sharing obligations was the result of a decrease in the CECL reserve due to improved unemployment forecasts. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, the provision was entirely the result of an increase in the balance of the at-risk servicing portfolio. We had a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to a provision for risk-sharing obligations of $27.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. For the six months ended June 30, 2021, the majority of the benefit for risk-sharing obligations was the result of a decrease in the CECL reserve due to improved unemployment forecasts. For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the majority of the provision was the result of an increase in the forecasted losses resulting from the pandemic.

We have never been required to repurchase a loan.

New/Recent Accounting Pronouncements

As seen in NOTE 2 in the financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there are no accounting pronouncements that the Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued and that have the potential to impact us but have not yet been adopted by us as of June 30, 2021.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

For loans held for sale to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD, we are not currently exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery processes. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated prior to closing on the loan with the borrower, and the sale or placement is typically effectuated within 60 days of closing. The coupon rate for the loan is set at the same time we establish the interest rate with the investor.

Some of our assets and liabilities are subject to changes in interest rates. Earnings from escrows generally track LIBOR. 30-day LIBOR as of June 30, 2021 and 2020 was 10 basis points and 16 basis points, respectively. The following table shows the impact on our annual escrow earnings due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in 30-day LIBOR based on our escrow balances outstanding at each period end. A portion of these changes in earnings as a result of a 100-basis point increase in the 30-day LIBOR would be delayed several months due to the negotiated nature of some of our escrow arrangements.


(in thousands)	As of June 30,
Change in annual escrow earnings due to:	2021		2020
100 basis point increase in 30-day LIBOR	$	30,204	$	22,939
100 basis point decrease in 30-day LIBOR⁽¹⁾		(2,996)		(3,269)

The borrowing cost of our warehouse facilities used to fund loans held for sale and loans held for investment is based on LIBOR. The interest income on our loans held for investment is based on LIBOR. The LIBOR reset date for loans held for investment is the same date as the LIBOR reset date for the corresponding warehouse facility. The following table shows the impact on our annual net warehouse interest income due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in 30-day LIBOR, based on our warehouse borrowings outstanding at each period end. The changes shown below do not reflect an increase or decrease in the interest rate earned on our loans held for sale.


(in thousands)	As of June 30,
Change in annual net warehouse interest income due to:	2021		2020
100 basis point increase in 30-day LIBOR	$	(15,928)	$	(15,377)
100 basis point decrease in 30-day LIBOR ⁽¹⁾		1,147		1,864

All of our corporate debt is based on 30-day LIBOR. The following table shows the impact on our annual earnings due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in 30-day LIBOR based on our note payable balance outstanding at each period end.


(in thousands)	As of June 30,
Change in annual income from operations due to:	2021		2020
100 basis point increase in 30-day LIBOR	$	(2,933)	$	(2,963)
100 basis point decrease in 30-day LIBOR ⁽¹⁾		295		474

(1)

The decrease is limited to the 30-day LIBOR rate as of period end as 30-day LIBOR was less than 100 basis points.

LIBOR Transition

In the first quarter of 2021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, the regulator for the administration of LIBOR, announced specific dates for its intention to stop publishing LIBOR rates, including the 30-day LIBOR (our primary reference rate) which is scheduled for June 30, 2023. It is expected that legacy LIBOR-based loans will transition to Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) before June 30, 2023. We continue to monitor our LIBOR exposure, review legal contracts and assess fallback language impacts, engage with our clients and other stakeholders, and monitor developments associated with LIBOR alternatives.

Market Value Risk

The fair value of our MSRs is subject to market risk. A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the weighted-average discount rate would decrease or increase, respectively, the fair value of our MSRs by approximately $36.9 million as of June 30, 2021, compared to $28.6 million as of June 30, 2020. Our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac servicing engagements provide for prepayment fees in the event of a voluntary

Table of Contents

prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment protection period. Our servicing contracts with institutional investors and HUD do not require them to provide us with prepayment fees. As of June 30, 2021, 89% of the servicing fees are protected from the risk of prepayment through prepayment provisions compared to 87% as of June 30, 2020. Given this significant level of prepayment protection, we do not hedge our servicing portfolio for prepayment risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, we may be party to various claims and litigation, none of which we believe is material. We cannot predict the outcome of any pending litigation and may be subject to consequences that could include fines, penalties and other costs, and our reputation and business may be impacted. Our management believes that any liability that could be imposed on us in connection with the disposition of any pending lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We have included in Part I, Item 1A of our 2020 Form 10-K descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance, or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). Except as described below, there have been no material changes from the disclosures provided in the 2020 Form 10-K with respect to the Risk Factors. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock.

If we fail to comply with laws, regulations and market standards regarding the privacy, use, and security of customer information, or if we are the target of a successful cyber-attack, we may be subject to legal and regulatory actions and our reputation would be harmed.

We receive, maintain, and store non-public personal information of some of our customers. The technology and other controls and processes designed to secure our customer information and to prevent, detect, and remedy any unauthorized access to that information were designed to obtain reasonable, not absolute, assurance that such information is secure and that any unauthorized access is identified and addressed appropriately. We, and our service providers, are regularly subject to cyberattacks that are increasingly sophisticated, that are often designed to evade detection, and/or that seek to damage or disrupt our network and other information systems. Certain of these cyberattacks have resulted in unauthorized access by third parties to information that we receive, maintain and store in the course of our business. Although these cyberattacks have not resulted in material financial impacts or disruptions or our business, given the accelerating scope and frequency of cyberattacks, there can be no assurance that the incidents we have experienced or any future incident will not materially impact our security, operations and financial results. Future cyberattacks could result in a loss of data, operational disruptions, and even lost business and goodwill.

Table of Contents

Additionally, we could incur significant costs associated with the recovery from a cyberattack, and these costs may exceed, or the events to which they relate, may be excluded from, coverage under, our cyber insurance.

If customer information is inappropriately accessed and used by a third party or an employee for illegal purposes, such as identity theft, we may be responsible to the affected applicant or borrower for any losses he or she may have incurred as a result of misappropriation. In such an instance, we may be liable to a governmental authority for fines or penalties, or subject to litigation, associated with a lapse in the integrity and security of our customers' information. Additionally, if we are the target of a successful cyber-attack, we may experience reputational harm that could impact our standing with our customers and adversely impact our financial results.

We regularly update our existing information technology systems and install new technologies when deemed necessary and regularly provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware, and other cyber risks and physical security to address the risk of cyber-attacks and other security breaches. However, such preventative measures may not be sufficient to prevent, detect or deflect future cyber-attacks or a breach of information, including customer information. Additionally, most of our employees have worked remotely since March of 2020 and some portion of our work force will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. While we have designed our controls and processes to operate in a remote working environment, there is a heightened risk such controls and processes may not detect or prevent unauthorized access to our information systems.

Risks Related to Our Acquisition of Zelman

As a registered broker-dealer, Zelman is subject to extensive regulation that exposes us to a variety of risks associated with the securities industry, for which we have not been previously exposed.

Broker-dealer and other financial services firms are subject to extensive regulatory requirements under federal and state laws and regulations and self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) rules. Zelman is registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer under the Exchange Act and in the states in which Zelman conducts securities business and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and other SROs. Zelman is subject to regulation, examination and disciplinary action by the SEC, FINRA and state securities regulators, as well as other governmental authorities and SROs with which Zelman is registered or licensed or of which Zelman is a member.

The regulations applicable to broker-dealers depend in part on the nature of the business conducted by the broker-dealer, and generally cover all aspects of the securities business, including, among other things, sales practices, fee arrangements, disclosures to clients, capital adequacy, use and safekeeping of clients’ funds and securities, recordkeeping and reporting and the qualification and conduct of officers, employees and independent contractors. As part of this regulatory scheme, broker-dealers are subject to regular and special examinations by the SEC and FINRA intended to determine their compliance with securities laws, regulations and rules. Following an examination’s conclusion, a broker-dealer may receive a deficiency letter identifying potential compliance or supervisory weaknesses or rule violations which the firm must address.

The SEC, FINRA and other governmental authorities and SROs may bring enforcement proceedings against firms and place other limitations on firms subject to their jurisdiction, as well as their officers, directors, employees and independent contractors, whether arising out of an examination or otherwise, for violations of the securities laws, regulations and rules. Sanctions can include cease-and-desist orders, censures, fines, civil monetary penalties and disgorgement, limitations on a firm’s business activities, suspension, revocation of FINRA membership or expulsion of the firm from the securities industry. Criminal actions are referred to the appropriate criminal law enforcement agency. Similarly, the attorneys general of each state could bring legal action to ensure compliance with state securities laws, and regulatory agencies in foreign countries have similar authority. Any such proceeding against Zelman, or any of its associated persons, could harm our reputation, cause us to lose clients or fail to gain new clients and have a material adverse effect on our business.

Additionally, our acquisition of Zelman may invite increased scrutiny from the SEC, FINRA and other governmental authorities into the other financial services which we provide, particularly our debt brokerage and property sales services. While we believe that we are in compliance with all relevant securities laws, regulations and rules, these regulatory organizations may choose to investigate our business practices outside of those of our broker-dealer subsidiary. Such investigations, whether or not they result in enforcement proceedings or criminal actions, could harm our reputation, cause us to lose clients or fail to gain new clients and materially and adversely affect us.

Financial services firms are also subject to rules and regulations relating to the prevention and detection of money laundering. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”) mandates that financial institutions, including broker-dealers and investment advisers, establish

Table of Contents

and implement anti-money laundering (“AML”) programs reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 and the rules thereunder. Financial services firms must maintain AML policies, procedures and controls, designate an AML compliance officer to oversee the firm’s AML program, implement appropriate employee training and provide for annual independent testing of the program. Any failure to comply with AML requirements could subject us to disciplinary sanctions and other penalties.

Our ability to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations will be largely dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance, supervision, recordkeeping and reporting and audit systems and procedures, as well as our ability to attract and retain qualified compliance, audit and risk management personnel. While we will adopt policies and procedures we believe are reasonably designed to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations, these systems and procedures may not be fully effective, and there can be no assurance that regulators or third parties will not raise material issues with respect to our past or future compliance with applicable regulations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, subject to the Company’s approval, grantees have the option of electing to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations at the time of vesting or exercise by allowing the Company to withhold and purchase the shares of stock otherwise issuable to the grantee. During the quarter ended June 30, 2021, we purchased eight thousand shares to satisfy grantee tax withholding obligations on share-vesting events. During the first quarter of 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of the Company’s common stock over a 12-month period beginning on February 12, 2021. During the quarter ended June 30, 2021 we did not repurchase any shares under this share repurchase program. The Company had $75.0 million of authorized share repurchase capacity remaining as of June 30, 2021. The following table provides information regarding common stock repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2021:


				Total Number of	Approximate
				Shares Purchased as	Dollar Value
	Total Number	Average		Part of Publicly	of Shares that May
	of Shares	Price Paid		Announced Plans	Yet Be Purchased Under
Period	Purchased	per Share		or Programs	the Plans or Programs
April 1-30, 2021	2,872	$	105.28	—	$	75,000
May 1-31, 2021	2,675		110.98	—		75,000
June 1-30, 2021	1,988		101.83	—		75,000
2nd Quarter	7,535	$	106.39	—	$	75,000

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) Exhibits:

2.1		Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2010, by and among Mallory Walker, Howard W. Smith, William M. Walker, Taylor Walker, Richard C. Warner, Donna Mighty, Michael Yavinsky, Edward B. Hermes, Deborah A. Wilson and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
2.2		Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2010, between Column Guaranteed LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
2.3		Amendment No. 1 to Contribution Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2010, by and between Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Column Guaranteed LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 13, 2010)
2.4		Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, CW Financial Services LLC and CWCapital LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 15, 2012)
3.1		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2018)
4.1		Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on September 30, 2010)
4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Mallory Walker, Taylor Walker, William M. Walker, Howard W. Smith, III, Richard C. Warner, Donna Mighty, Michael Yavinsky, Ted Hermes, Deborah A. Wilson and Column Guaranteed LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2010)
4.3		Stockholders Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, by and among William M. Walker, Mallory Walker, Column Guaranteed LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2010)
4.4		Piggy-Back Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 7, 2012, by and among Column Guaranteed, LLC, William M. Walker, Mallory Walker, Howard W. Smith, III, Deborah A. Wilson, Richard C. Warner, CW Financial Services LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 filed on August 9, 2012)
4.5		Voting Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Mallory Walker, William M. Walker, Richard Warner, Deborah Wilson, Richard M. Lucas, and Howard W. Smith, III, and CW Financial Services LLC (incorporated by reference to Annex C of the Company’s proxy statement filed on July 26, 2012)
4.6		Voting Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Column Guaranteed, LLC and CW Financial Services LLC (incorporated by reference to Annex D of the Company’s proxy statement filed on July 26, 2012)
10.1		Ninth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2021, by and among Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2021).
10.2		Tenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2021, by and among Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and PNC Bank, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2021).
31.1	*	Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	*	Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	**	Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS		Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained an Exhibit 101)

*: Filed herewith.

**: Furnished herewith. Information in this Form 10-Q furnished herewith shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	Walker & Dunlop, Inc
Date: August 5, 2021	By:	/s/ William M. Walker
		William M. Walker
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 5, 2021	By:	/s/ Stephen P. Theobald
		Stephen P. Theobald
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer