SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission File Number 001-14039
Callon Petroleum Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|State or Other Jurisdiction of|
Incorporation or Organization
|I.R.S. Employer Identification No.|
|One Briarlake Plaza|
|2000 W. Sam Houston Parkway S., Suite 2000|
|Address of Principal Executive Offices||Zip Code|
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|Title of Each Class||Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:||Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered|
|Common Stock, $0.01 par value||CPE||New York Stock Exchange|
|Securities registered pursuant to section 12 (g) of the Act: None|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|Large accelerated filer||☐||Accelerated filer||☒||Non-accelerated filer||☐|
|Smaller reporting company||☐||Emerging growth company||☐|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2020 was approximately $443.3 million.
The Registrant had 46,153,710 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 23, 2021.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement of Callon Petroleum Company (to be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2020) relating to the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which are incorporated into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K by words such as “anticipate,” “project,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “believe,” “predict,” “budget,” “projection,” “goal,” “plan,” “forecast,” “target” or similar expressions.
All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements, including such things as:
•our oil and natural gas reserve quantities, and the discounted present value of these reserves;
•the amount and nature of our capital expenditures;
•our future drilling and development plans and our potential drilling locations;
•the timing and amount of future capital and operating costs;
•production decline rates from our wells being greater than expected;
•commodity price risk management activities and the impact on our average realized prices;
•business strategies and plans of management;
•our ability to efficiently integrate recent acquisitions; and
•prospect development and property acquisitions.
We caution you that the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K”) are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production and sale of oil and natural gas. We disclose these and other important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I in this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors include:
•the volatility of oil and natural gas prices or a prolonged period of low oil or natural gas prices;
•general economic conditions, including the availability of credit and access to existing lines of credit;
•changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and various governmental actions taken to mitigate its impact or actions by, or disputes among, members of OPEC and other oil and natural gas producing countries, such as Russia, with respect to production levels or other matters related to the price of oil;
•the uncertainty of estimates of oil and natural gas reserves;
•the impact of competition;
•the availability and cost of seismic, drilling and other equipment, waste and water disposal infrastructure, and personnel;
•operating hazards inherent in the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas;
•difficulties encountered during the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas;
•the potential impact of future drilling on production from existing wells
•difficulties encountered in delivering oil and natural gas to commercial markets;
•the uncertainty of our ability to attract capital and obtain financing on favorable terms;
•compliance with, or the effect of changes in, the extensive governmental regulations regarding the oil and natural gas business including those related to climate change and greenhouse gases;
•the impact of government regulation, including regulation of hydraulic fracturing and water disposal wells;
•any increase in severance or similar taxes;
•the financial impact of accounting regulations and critical accounting policies;
•the comparative cost of alternative fuels;
•credit risk relating to the risk of loss as a result of non-performance by our counterparties;
•cyberattacks on the Company or on systems and infrastructure used by the oil and natural gas industry;
•weather conditions; and
•risks associated with acquisitions, including the acquisition of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Carrizo Acquisition” or the “Merger”).
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks or uncertainties that are not currently known to us, that we currently deem to be immaterial, or that could apply to any company could also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or future results. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of which such statement is made and the Company undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except required by applicable law.
In addition, we caution that reserve engineering is a process of estimating oil and natural gas accumulated underground and cannot be measured exactly. Accuracy of reserve estimates depend on a number of factors including data available at the point in time,
engineering interpretation of the data, and assumptions used by the reserve engineers as it relates to price and cost estimates and recoverability. New results of drilling, testing, and production history may result in revisions of previous estimates and, if significant, would impact future development plans. As such, reserve estimates may differ from actual results of oil and natural gas quantities ultimately recovered.
Except as required by applicable law, all forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that we or persons acting on our behalf may issue.
GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN TERMS
All defined terms under Rule 4-10(a) of Regulation S-X shall have their prescribed meanings when used in this report. As used in this document:
•ARO: asset retirement obligation.
•ASU: accounting standards update.
•Bbl or Bbls: barrel or barrels of oil or natural gas liquids.
•Boe: barrel of oil equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of natural gas. The ratio of one barrel of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of natural gas is commonly used in the industry and represents the approximate energy equivalence of oil or NGLs to natural gas, and does not represent the economic equivalency of oil and NGLs to natural gas. The sales price of a barrel of oil or NGLs is considerably higher than the sales price of six Mcf of natural gas.
•Boe/d: Boe per day.
•Btu: a British thermal unit, which is a measure of the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.
•Completion: the process of treating a drilled well followed by the installation of permanent equipment for the production of oil or natural gas or, in the case of a dry hole, the reporting of abandonment to the appropriate agency.
•Cushing: an oil delivery point that serves as the benchmark oil price for West Texas Intermediate.
•Development well: A well drilled within the proved area of an oil or natural gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.
•EPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
•Exploratory well: a well drilled to find a new field or to find a new reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir.
•Extension well: a well drilled to extend the limits of a known reservoir.
•FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
•GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States.
•GHG: greenhouse gases.
•Henry Hub: a natural gas pipeline delivery point that serves as the benchmark natural gas price underlying NYMEX natural gas futures contracts.
•Horizontal drilling: a drilling technique used in certain formations where a well is drilled vertically to a certain depth and then drilled at an angle within a specified interval.
•ICE: Intercontinental Exchange.
•LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate.
•LOE: lease operating expense.
•MBbls: thousand barrels of oil.
•MBoe: thousand Boe.
•Mcf: thousand cubic feet of natural gas.
•MEH: Magellan East Houston, a delivery point in Houston, Texas that serves as a benchmark for crude oil.
•MMBoe: million Boe.
•MMBtu: million Btu.
•MMcf: million cubic feet of natural gas.
•NGL or NGLs: natural gas liquids, such as ethane, propane, butanes and natural gasoline that are extracted from natural gas production streams.
•Non-productive well: A well that is found to be incapable of producing oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion, or upon completion, the economic operation of an oil or gas well.
•NYMEX: New York Mercantile Exchange.
•Oil: includes crude oil and condensate.
•OPEC: Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries.
•PDPs: proved developed producing reserves.
•Productive well: A well that is found to be capable of producing oil or gas in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.
•Proved developed producing reserves: Proved reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well.
•Proved reserves: Those reserves which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced, or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project, within a reasonable time.
The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes all of the following:
a.The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and
b.Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.
Reserves that can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when both of the following occur:
a.Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based, and
b.The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.
Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12‑month period before the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.
•Proved undeveloped reserves: Proved reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless specific circumstances justify a longer time. Under no circumstances shall estimates of proved undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.
•PUDs: proved undeveloped reserves.
•PV-10 (Non-GAAP): the present value of estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of estimated net proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development costs, using prices and costs in effect as of the date indicated (unless such prices or costs are subject to change pursuant to contractual provisions), without giving effect to non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service and future income tax expenses or to depreciation, depletion and amortization, discounted using an annual discount rate of 10 percent. While this measure does not include the effect of income taxes as it would in the use of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows calculation, it does provide an indicative representation of the relative value of the Company on a comparative basis to other companies from period to period. This is a non-GAAP measure. See “Items 1 and 2 - Business and Properties - Proved Oil and Gas Reserves - Reconciliation of Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (GAAP) to PV-10 (Non-GAAP)”.
•Realized price: the cash market price less all expected quality, transportation and demand adjustments.
•Royalty interest: an interest that gives an owner the right to receive a portion of the resources or revenues without having to carry any costs of development.
•RSU: restricted stock units.
•SEC: United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
•Waha: a natural gas delivery point in West Texas that serves as the benchmark for natural gas.
•Working interest: an operating interest that gives the owner the right to drill, produce and conduct operating activities on the property and receive a share of production and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production operations.
•WTI: West Texas Intermediate grade crude oil, used as a pricing benchmark for sales contracts and NYMEX oil futures contracts.
With respect to information relating to our working interest in wells or acreage, “net” oil and gas wells or acreage is determined by multiplying gross wells or acreage by our working interest therein. Unless otherwise specified, all references to wells and acres are gross.
ITEMS 1 and 2 – Business and Properties
Callon Petroleum Company has been engaged in the exploration, development, acquisition and production of oil and natural gas properties since 1950. As used herein, the “Company,” “Callon,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Callon Petroleum Company and its predecessors and subsidiaries unless the context requires otherwise.
We are an independent oil and natural gas company focused on the acquisition, exploration and development of high-quality assets in the leading oil plays of South and West Texas. Our activities are primarily focused on horizontal development in the Midland and Delaware Basins, both of which are part of the larger Permian Basin in West Texas, as well as the Eagle Ford, which we entered into through our acquisition of Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Carrizo”) in late 2019. Our primary operations in the Permian reflect a high-return, oil-weighted drilling inventory with multiple prospective horizontal development intervals and are complemented by a well-established and repeatable cash flow generating business in the Eagle Ford.
Major Developments in 2020
COVID-19 Outbreak and Global Industry Downturn. The worldwide outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, the uncertainty regarding the impact of COVID-19 and various governmental actions taken to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 have resulted in an unprecedented decline in demand for oil and natural gas. At the same time, the decision by Saudi Arabia in March 2020 to drastically reduce export prices and increase oil production followed by curtailment agreements among OPEC and other countries such as Russia further increased uncertainty and volatility around global oil supply-demand dynamics. As a result, there is an excess supply of oil in the United States, which could continue for a sustained period; this is in addition to recent and continued excess supply of natural gas in the United States. This excess supply, in turn, resulted in transportation and storage capacity constraints in the United States during 2020, although these constraints have recently lessened and inventories have declined from peak levels.
The COVID-19 outbreak and its development into a pandemic in March 2020 have required that we take precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk to our business, employees, customers, suppliers and the communities in which we operate. Our operational employees continue to work on site. However, we have taken various precautionary measures with respect to such operational employees such as requiring them to verify they have not experienced any symptoms consistent with COVID-19, or been in close contact with someone showing such symptoms, before reporting to the work site, being prepared to quarantine any operational employees who have shown signs of COVID-19 (regardless of whether such employee has been confirmed to be infected), and, while at the work site, imposing safety protocols in accordance with the guidelines released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In addition, a large portion of our non-operational employees are now working remotely, and we have established COVID-19 specific safety protocols for those working from the office. We have not yet experienced any material operational disruptions (including disruptions from our suppliers and service providers) as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Financing and Liquidity Updates
•As of December 31, 2020, our senior secured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) had a borrowing base and elected commitment amount of $1.6 billion and borrowings outstanding of $985.0 million.
•On November 13, 2020, we completed an exchange with certain holders of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2023 (the “6.25% Senior Notes”), 6.125% Senior Notes due 2024 (the “6.125% Senior Notes”), 8.25% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “8.25% Senior Notes”), and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “6.375% Senior Notes” and together with the 6.25% Senior Notes, the 6.125% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior Notes, the “Senior Unsecured Notes”) to exchange $389.0 million of aggregate principal amount of Senior Unsecured Notes for $216.7 million of our 9.00% Second Lien Senior Secured Notes due 2025 (the “November 2020 Second Lien Notes”) and warrants for 1.75 million shares of common stock (the “November 2020 Warrants”).
•On September 30, 2020, we issued $300.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 9.00% Second Lien Senior Secured Notes due 2025 (“September 2020 Second Lien Notes” and together with the November 2020 Second Lien Notes the “Second Lien Notes”) and warrants for 7.3 million shares of common stock (“September 2020 Warrants”) for proceeds, net of issuance costs, of approximately $288.6 million.
See “Note 7 – Borrowings”, “Note 8 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and “Note 11 – Stockholders’ Equity” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Divestitures. On September 30, 2020, we sold an undivided 2.0% (on an 8/8ths basis) overriding royalty interest, proportionately reduced to our net revenue interest, in and to our operated leases, excluding certain interests (“ORRI Transaction”). On November 2, 2020, we also closed on a sale of substantially all of our non-operated assets. We received combined net proceeds of approximately $165.4 million, which was used to repay borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility.
See “Note 4 – Acquisitions and Divestitures” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Reverse Stock Split. On August 7, 2020 following approval by our shareholders at the June 8, 2020 annual meeting of shareholders of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split, our Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio of 1-for-10 and a proportionate reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock. Our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on August 10, 2020 upon opening of the markets. See “Note 11 – Stockholders’ Equity” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Operational Activity. Due to the decline in crude oil prices in 2020 and ongoing uncertainty regarding the oil supply-demand macro environment, we reduced our development plan in order to preserve capital, including the temporary cessation of all drilling and completion activities for most of the second and third quarters of 2020. We reactivated two completion crews, one each in the Eagle Ford and Permian, both of which completed previously drilled multi-well projects during September. Subsequently, one of the two completion crews was released and three drilling rigs resumed operations, two restarting operations in the Permian during September and the third reactivated in the Eagle Ford during October. This reduction in activity resulted in our actual 2020 operational capital expenditures to be approximately 50% of our original operational capital budget for 2020 of $975.0 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we drilled 91 gross (86.0 net) wells and completed 90 gross (81.4 net) wells. Our net daily production was 101,620 Boe/d (approximately 63% oil), an increase of approximately 146% when compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily as a result of the properties acquired in the Carrizo Acquisition in late 2019 as well as our developmental activities during the year. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our estimated proved reserves were 475.9 MMBoe and included proved oil reserves of 289.5 MMBbls (61% of total proved reserves). Approximately 45% of our 2020 year-end estimated proved reserves were classified as proved developed. See “— Summary of 2020 Proved Reserves, Production and Drilling by Region” below for additional details.
Our Business Strategy
Our principal objective is to enhance shareholder value through capital efficient development of our proved reserves, management of our operating costs, and maximization of cash flows while acting as a responsible corporate citizen in the areas in which we operate. Key elements of the execution of this strategy include:
•Improving the capital efficiency of our operations in terms of both well productivity and capital outlays, including supporting facilities;
•Optimizing the development of our multi-zone resource base through thoughtful plans of life of field development that are informed by extensive analysis of subsurface data and empirical well results;
•Maturing our asset base into a sustainable operating model for profitable reinvestment of cash flows for attractive, long-term returns on capital;
•Maintaining strong cash margins per unit of production through cost management and proactive investment in production infrastructure;
•Enhancing our financial position, focusing on appropriate capital allocation decisions under various commodity pricing scenarios, prudent risk management and generating free cash flow to reduce leverage;
•Maximizing and preserving our inventory of well locations through selective delineation of emerging targets on our existing acreage positions and scaled development of proven areas to minimize potential degradation of future drilling locations; and
•Integrating sustainable business practices that minimize our impact on the environment, empower and develop a diverse workforce, and enrich our communities.
We believe the following attributes position Callon to achieve its objectives:
•Strong Foundation - Reputation as a safe and responsible operator built over several decades in the oil and gas industry;
•Quality Assets - High quality Permian asset base with several years of proven well results from multiple target zones that benefit from early investments in critical supporting infrastructure including sustainable investments in water recycling and a more mature asset base in the Eagle Ford which has lower operational risk and generates repeatable, profitable well results;
•Operational Control - High degree of operational control that allows us to efficiently maximize value through daily and long-term decisions that drive our strategy;
•Talented Workforce - Seasoned employee base that has benefited from the addition of employees from the Carrizo Acquisition, who have been integrated into our collaborative culture;
•Sustainable Business Practices - Focus on value creation in a responsible manner by utilizing an operating philosophy that provides our employees a safe workplace while at the same time conducting operations in a manner that is environmentally sensitive and community aware. See our Sustainability Report published on our company website (www.callon.com) for performance highlights and additional information. Information contained in our Sustainability Report is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Oil and Natural Gas Properties
Summary of 2020 Proved Reserves, Production and Drilling by Region
|Crude oil (MBbls)||215,572||73,915||289,487|
|Natural gas (MMcf)||477,160||64,438||541,598|
|Total proved reserves (MBoe)||379,467||96,412||475,879|
|Proved reserves by classification (MBoe)|
|Total proved reserves (MBoe)||379,467||96,412||475,879|
|Percent of proved developed reserves||78 ||%||22 ||%||100 ||%|
|Percent of proved undeveloped reserves||81 ||%||19 ||%||100 ||%|
|Percent of total reserves||80 ||%||20 ||%||100 ||%|
|Production volumes||Total||Per Day||Total||Per Day||Total||Per Day|
|Crude oil (MBbls and Bbls/d)||14,113 ||38,560||9,430 ||25,765||23,543 ||64,325|
|Natural gas (MMcf and Mcf/d)||32,087 ||87,669||8,714 ||23,809||40,801 ||111,478|
|NGLs (MBbls and Bbls/d)||5,390 ||14,727||1,460 ||3,989||6,850 ||18,716|
|Total production volumes (MBoe and Boe/d)||24,851 ||67,899||12,342 ||33,721||37,193 ||101,620|
|Percent of total production||67 ||%||33 ||%||100 ||%|
|Operated Well Data||Gross||Net||Gross||Net||Gross||Net|
|Drilled||52 ||47.3||39 ||38.7||91 ||86.0|
|Completed||52 ||46.9||38 ||34.5||90 ||81.4|
|As of December 31, 2020|
|Drilled but uncompleted||28 ||25.3||37 ||36.8||65 ||62.1|
|Producing||846 ||738.3||650 ||582.3||1,496 ||1,320.6|
As of December 31, 2020, our acreage position comprised 130,349 gross (106,371 net) acres in the Permian, all of which was located in the Midland and Delaware Basins. Average net production from our Permian properties increased approximately 69% to 67,899 Boe/d in 2020 from 40,287 Boe/d in 2019, primarily as a result of the Carrizo Acquisition. We currently expect to direct the majority of our 2021 Capital Budget, as defined below, towards opportunities in the Permian.
We acquired our Eagle Ford properties, primarily located in LaSalle County and, to a lesser extent, in McMullen, Frio and Atascosa counties in Texas, through the Carrizo Acquisition in late 2019. As of December 31, 2020, we held interests in approximately 90,079 gross (73,683 net) acres. Average net production from our Eagle Ford properties was 33,721 Boe/d in 2020.
Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
The following table sets forth summary information with respect to our estimated proved reserves, standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and PV-10 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. For each year in the table below, the estimated proved reserves were prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton (“D&M”), Callon’s independent third party reserve engineers, with the exception of the estimated proved reserves in 2019 obtained as a result of the Carrizo Acquisition in late 2019, which were prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. (“Ryder Scott”), the independent third party reserve engineers historically retained by Carrizo. For further information concerning D&M’s estimates of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2020, see the reserve report included as an exhibit to this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The prices used in the calculation of our estimated proved reserves and PV-10 were based on the average realized prices for sales of oil, NGLs, and natural gas on the first calendar day of each month during the year (“12-Month Average Realized Price”) in accordance with SEC rules.
|As of December 31,|
Proved developed reserves (1)(2)
|Crude oil (MBbls)||128,923||152,687||92,202|
|Natural gas (MMcf)||238,119||320,676||218,417|
|Total proved developed reserves (MBoe)||211,925||230,977||128,605|
Proved undeveloped reserves (1)(2)
| || || |
|Crude oil (MBbls)||160,564||193,674||87,895|
|Natural gas (MMcf)||303,479||436,458||132,049|
|Total proved undeveloped reserves (MBoe)||263,954||309,035||109,903|
Total proved reserves (1)(2)
|Crude oil (MBbls)||289,487||346,361||180,097|
|Natural gas (MMcf)||541,598||757,134||350,466|
|Total proved reserves (MBoe)||475,879||540,012||238,508|
|Proved developed reserves %||45 ||%||43 ||%||54 ||%|
|Proved undeveloped reserves %||55 ||%||57 ||%||46 ||%|
|12-Month Average Realized Prices|
|Crude oil ($/Bbl)||$37.44||$53.90||$58.40|
|Natural gas ($/Mcf)||$1.02||$1.55||$3.64|
|Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (GAAP) (in millions)||$2,310.4||$4,951.0||$2,941.3|
|PV-10 (Non-GAAP) (in millions):|
|Proved developed PV-10||$1,577.3||$3,246.8||$2,222.0|
|Proved undeveloped PV-10||767.7||2,122.8||927.2|
|Total PV-10 (Non-GAAP)||$2,345.0||$5,369.6||$3,149.2|
(1) Effective January 1, 2020, certain of our natural gas processing agreements were modified to allow us to take title to NGLs resulting from the processing of our natural gas. As a result, reserve volumes for NGLs and natural gas are presented separately for periods subsequent to January 1, 2020. For periods prior to January 1, 2020, except for reserve volumes specifically associated with Carrizo, we presented our reserve volumes for NGLs with natural gas.
(2) Includes the proved reserves associated with the Carrizo Acquisition for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Reconciliation of Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows (GAAP) to PV-10 (Non-GAAP)
We believe that the presentation of PV-10 provides greater comparability when evaluating oil and gas companies due to the many factors unique to each individual company that impact the amount and timing of future income taxes. In addition, we believe that PV-10 is widely used by investors and analysts as a basis for comparing the relative size and value of our proved reserves to other oil and gas companies. PV-10 should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows or any other measure of a company’s financial or operating performance presented in accordance with GAAP. The
definition of PV-10 as defined in “Glossary of Certain Terms” may differ significantly from the definitions used by other companies to compute similar measures. As a result, PV-10 as defined may not be comparable to similar measures provided by other companies. A reconciliation of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows to PV-10 is presented below. Neither PV-10 nor the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows purport to represent the fair value of our proved oil and gas reserves.
|As of December 31,|
|Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (GAAP)||$2,310.4 ||$4,951.0 ||$2,941.3 |
|Add: present value of future income taxes discounted at 10% per annum||34.6 ||418.6 ||207.9 |
|PV-10 (Non-GAAP)||$2,345.0 ||$5,369.6 ||$3,149.2 |
Our reserve estimates are conducted from fundamental petrophysical, geological, engineering, financial and accounting data. Reserves are estimated based on production decline analysis, analogy to producing offsets, detailed reservoir modeling, volumetric calculations or a combination of these methods, in all cases having regard to economic considerations and using technologies that have been demonstrated in the field to yield repeatable and consistent results as defined in the SEC regulations. To establish reasonable certainty of our proved reserves estimates, including material additions to our proved reserves, we use certain technologies and economic data, including production and well test data, historical well costs and operating data, geologic and seismic data, and subsurface information obtained through wellbores such as electrical logs, radioactive logs, reservoir core samples, fluid samples, and static and dynamic pressure information. Non-producing reserves are estimated by analogy to producing offsets, with consideration given to a development plan approved by Callon’s management.
As of December 31, 2020, our estimated proved reserves totaled 475.9 MMBoe, a decrease of 12% from the prior year end, and included 289.5 MMBbls of oil, 541.6 Bcf of natural gas and 96.1 MMBbls of NGLs with a standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of $2.3 billion. Oil constituted approximately 61% of our total estimated proved reserves as well as our total estimated proved developed reserves. The following table provides a summary of the changes in our proved reserves for the year ended December 31, 2020.
|Proved reserves as of December 31, 2019||540,012 |
|Extensions and discoveries||41,407 |
|Revisions to previous estimates||(52,227)|
|Sales of reserves in place||(16,120)|
|Proved reserves as of December 31, 2020||475,879 |
Further details of the changes in our proved reserves for the year ended December 31, 2020 are as follows:
•Extensions and discoveries. We added 41.4 MMBoe of new reserves in extensions and discoveries through our development efforts in our operating areas. See the table below for the impact of extensions and discoveries on total proved and proved undeveloped reserves for 2020:
|Extensions and discoveries||Total |
|Total proved||41,407 |
|Proved undeveloped||29,698 |
Difference (Proved developed producing)(1)
(1) These extensions and discoveries were not recognized as proved undeveloped reserves in a prior period, but rather were recognized directly as proved developed producing reserves as there was not an offset proved developed producing location at the time of drilling in order to classify as a proved undeveloped location.
We incurred costs of $77.5 million for the extensions and discoveries associated with proved developed producing wells during 2020.
•Revisions to previous estimates. The table below shows the components of the net negative revisions of previous estimates of 52.2 MMBoe.
PUDs removed due to changes in development plan(3)
Assumptions for operational expenses(5)
|Total revisions to previous estimates||(52,227)|
(1) Primarily as a result of the change in 12-Month Average Realized Price of crude oil, which decreased by approximately 31% as compared to December 31, 2019. Included in the decrease in the table above was 2.1 MMBoe associated with proved developed producing wells and 0.8 MMBoe associated with proved undeveloped wells that were no longer economic at December 31, 2020 as a result of the decrease in the 12-Month Average Realized Price of crude oil.
(2) Primarily related to reductions in anticipated hydrocarbon recoveries resulting from observed well performance over longer production timeframes during the testing of various full field development plan concepts.
(3) Removed primarily as a result of changes in anticipated well densities as we develop our properties in an effort to increase capital efficiency and cash flow generation.
(4) Volumetric impact from presenting NGLs and natural gas separately due to the modification of certain of our natural gas processing agreements which allow us to take title to NGLs resulting from the processing of our natural gas subsequent to January 1, 2020. For periods prior to January 1, 2020, except for reserve volumes specifically associated with Carrizo, we presented our reserve volumes for NGLs with natural gas.
(5) Reduced assumptions for operational expenses as we continued to improve our field practices during the integration of the properties acquired from Carrizo.
•Sales of reserves in place. The 16.1 MMBoe of sales of reserves in place were primarily associated with the ORRI Transaction and the sale of substantially all of our non-operated assets. See “Note 4 - Acquisitions and Divestitures” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
Annually, we review our PUDs to ensure appropriate plans exist for development of this reserve category. PUD reserves are recorded only if we have plans to convert these reserves into PDPs within five years of the date they are first recorded. Our development plans include the allocation of capital to projects included within our 2021 Capital Budget, as defined below, and, in subsequent years, the allocation of capital within our long-range business plan to convert PUDs to PDPs within this five-year period. The following table provides a summary of the changes in our PUDs for the year ended December 31, 2020.
|PUDs as of December 31, 2019||309,036 |
|Extensions and discoveries||29,698 |
|Revisions to previous estimates||(27,220)|
|Sales of reserves in place||(6,158)|
|Converted to proved developed||(41,402)|
|PUDs as of December 31, 2020||263,954 |
•Extensions and discoveries. We added 29.7 MMBoe of new reserves in extensions and discoveries as a result of additional offset locations associated with our drilling program.
•Revisions to previous estimates. The table below shows the components of the net negative revisions of previous estimates of 27.2 MMBoe.
PUDs removed due to changes in development plan(1)
Assumptions for operational expenses(5)
|Total revisions to previous estimates||(27,220)|
(1) Removed primarily as a result of changes in anticipated well densities as we develop our properties in an effort to increase capital efficiency and cash flow generation.
(2) Primarily as a result of the change in 12-Month Average Realized Price of crude oil which decreased by approximately 31% as compared to December 31, 2019. Included in the decrease in the table above was 0.8 MMBoe associated with proved undeveloped wells that were no longer economic at December 31, 2020.
(3) Volumetric impact from presenting NGLs and natural gas separately due to the modification of certain of our natural gas processing agreements which allow us to take title to NGLs resulting from the processing of our natural gas subsequent to January 1, 2020. For periods prior to January 1, 2020, except for reserve volumes specifically associated with Carrizo, we presented our reserve volumes for NGLs with natural gas.
(4) Primarily related to reductions in anticipated hydrocarbon recoveries resulting from observed well performance over longer production timeframes during the testing of various full field development plan concepts.
(5) Reduced assumptions for operational expenses as we continued to improve our field practices during the integration of the properties acquired from Carrizo.
•Sales of reserves in place. The 6.2 MMBoe of sales of reserves in place were primarily associated with the ORRI Transaction. See “Note 4 - Acquisitions and Divestitures” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
•Converted to proved developed. During 2020, we converted 41.4 MMBoe of PUDs that were booked as PUDs as of December 31, 2019 to proved developed at a cost of $224.4 million, or $5.42 per Boe. During 2020, our PUD conversion was below 20% primarily as a result of the significant decrease in operational capital expenditures, which included the temporary cessation of all drilling and completion activities for most of the second and third quarters of 2020, due to declines in crude oil prices in 2020 and ongoing uncertainty regarding the oil supply-demand macro-economic environment. We currently estimate that we will convert between 40% and 45% of our PUDs as of December 31, 2020 in 2021 and 2022.
During 2020, we also incurred $76.4 million on PUDs that were drilled but uncompleted as of December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, we had 25.3 MMBoe of PUDs associated with drilled but uncompleted wells. All of the reserves associated with drilled but uncompleted wells are scheduled to be completed in 2021. We expect to incur approximately $126.0 million of capital expenditures to complete these wells.
At December 31, 2020, we did not have any reserves that have remained undeveloped for five or more years since the date of their initial booking and all PUD locations are scheduled to be developed within five years of their initial booking.
Qualifications of Technical Persons
In accordance with the Standards Pertaining to Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, D&M prepared 100% of our estimates of proved reserves as of December 31, 2020 and 2018 and 40% of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2019. Ryder Scott prepared the estimates of proved reserves associated with the Carrizo Acquisition, which comprised approximately 60% of our proved reserves as of December 31, 2019. D&M is a respected company in the reservoir engineering field and provides petroleum property analysis for other upstream companies. The technical persons responsible for preparing the reserves estimates meet the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity and confidentiality set forth in the Standards Pertaining to Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Neither D&M nor Ryder Scott owns an interest in our properties, and neither is employed on a contingent fee basis.
Our internal director of reserves has over 20 years of experience in the petroleum industry and extensive experience in the estimation of reserves and the review of reserve reports prepared by third party engineering firms. Compliance as it relates to reporting the Company’s reserves is the responsibility of our Chief Operating Officer, who is also our principal engineer. He has over 30 years of operations and industry experience and holds B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Petroleum Engineering, in addition to a M.S. in Environmental and Planning Engineering, and is experienced in asset evaluation and management.
Internal Controls Over Reserve Estimation Process
The primary inputs to the reserve estimation process are comprised of technical information, financial data, production data, and ownership interest. All field and reservoir technical information is assessed for validity when the internal reserve engineer holds technical meetings with our geoscientists, operations, and land personnel to discuss field performance and to validate future development plans. The other inputs used in the reserve estimation process, including, but not limited to, future capital expenditures, commodity price differentials, production costs, and ownership percentages are subject to internal controls over financial reporting and are assessed for effectiveness annually.
To further enhance the control environment over the reserve estimation process, our Strategic Planning and Reserves Committee, an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”), assists management and the Board of Directors with its oversight of the integrity of the determination of our oil and natural gas reserves and the work of the independent third party reserve engineers. The Strategic Planning and Reserves Committee’s charter also specifies that it shall perform, in consultation with the Company’s management and senior reserves and reservoir engineering personnel, the following responsibilities:
•Oversee the appointment, qualification, independence, compensation and retention of the independent third party reserve engineers engaged by the Company (including resolution of material disagreements between management and the independent third party reserve engineers regarding reserve determination) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an annual reserve report. The Strategic Planning and Reserves Committee shall review any proposed changes in the appointment of the independent third party reserve engineers, determine the reasons for such proposal, and whether there have been any disputes between the independent third party reserve engineers and management.
•Review the Company’s significant reserves engineering principles and any material changes thereto, and any proposed changes in reserves engineering standards and principles which have, or may have, a material impact on the Company’s reserves disclosure.
•Review with management and the independent third party reserve engineers the proved reserves of the Company, and, if appropriate, the probable reserves, possible reserves and the total reserves of the Company, including: (i) reviewing significant changes from prior period reports; (ii) reviewing key assumptions used or relied upon by the independent third party reserve engineers; (iii) evaluating the quality of the reserve estimates prepared by the independent third party reserve engineers and the Company relative to the Company’s peers in the industry; and (iv) reviewing any material reserves adjustments and significant differences between the Company’s and independent third party reserve engineers’ estimates.
•If the Strategic Planning and Reserves Committee deems it necessary, it shall meet in executive session with the independent third party reserve engineers to discuss the oil and gas reserve determination process and related public disclosures, and any other matters of concern in respect of the evaluation of the reserves.
During our last fiscal year, we filed no reports with other federal agencies which contain an estimate of proved reserves.
See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Supplemental Information on Oil and Natural Gas Operations” for additional information regarding our estimated proved reserves and the present value of estimated future net revenues from these proved reserves.
Our Board approved an operational capital budget for expenditures of up to $430.0 million (the “2021 Capital Budget”), with approximately 80% directed towards drilling, completion, and equipment expenditures. Our scaled development plan for 2021 will continue to employ our life of field development philosophy and benefit from our balanced capital deployment strategy. The 2021 Capital Budget leverages the structural savings and operational efficiencies achieved during 2020 from shared best practices following the integration of Callon and Carrizo. Approximately 70% of the 2021 Capital Budget is allocated towards development in the Permian with the remaining 30% towards development in the Eagle Ford. As part of our 2021 operated horizontal drilling program, we expect to drill approximately 55 to 65 gross operated wells and complete approximately 90 to 100 gross operated wells.
Our revenues, earnings, and liquidity are substantially dependent on the prices we receive for, and our ability to develop, our reserves of oil and natural gas. We believe that we are positioned to execute on our strategy even during downturns in the industry due to our resource base, low cost structure, risk management, and disciplined investment of capital. We monitor current and expected market conditions, including the commodity price environment, and our liquidity needs and may adjust our capital investment plan accordingly.
The following table sets forth our operated and non-operated drilling activity for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. In the table, “gross” refers to the total wells in which we have a working interest and “net” refers to gross wells multiplied by our working interest therein. As defined by the SEC, the number of wells drilled refers to the number of wells completed at any time during the respective year, regardless of when drilling was initiated. For definitions of exploratory wells, extension wells, development wells, productive wells, and non-productive wells, see “—Glossary of Certain Terms”.
| ||Years Ended December 31,|
Exploratory Wells - Productive (2)
|22 ||16.0 ||56 ||36.7 ||55 ||44.7 |
|Exploratory Wells - Non-productive||— ||— ||— ||— ||— ||— |
|Development Wells - Productive||73 ||66.0 ||15 ||11.6 ||15 ||12.8 |
|Development Wells - Non-productive||— ||— ||— ||— ||— ||— |
(1) Includes activity on properties acquired in the Carrizo Acquisition subsequent to the December 20, 2019 closing date.
(2) These wells are extension wells. While these wells were drilled on undeveloped acreage targeting formations which in prior periods were not recognized as proved undeveloped due to inadequate evidence using reliable technology to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability, there were no new field or new reservoir discoveries pursuant to the definition of an exploratory well.
The following table sets forth the number of productive crude oil and natural gas wells in which we owned an interest as of December 31, 2020.
| ||Crude Oil||Natural Gas||Total|
|Permian - Operated||763 ||665.5 ||116 ||101.2 ||879 ||766.7 |
Permian - Non-operated (1)
|5 ||0.9 ||15 ||0.7 ||20 ||1.6 |
|Total Permian ||768 ||666.4 ||131 ||101.9 ||899 ||768.3 |
|Eagle Ford - Operated||647 ||579.8 ||3 ||2.5 ||650 ||582.3 |
Eagle Ford - Non-operated (1)
|13 ||0.8 ||— ||— ||13 ||0.8 |
|Total Eagle Ford ||660 ||580.6 ||3 ||2.5 ||663 ||583.1 |
|Total||1,428 ||1,247.0 ||134 ||104.4 ||1,562 ||1,351.4 |
(1) On November 2, 2020, we sold substantially all of our non-operated assets for net proceeds of $29.6 million, subject to post-closing adjustments.
Production Volumes, Average Sales Prices and Operating Costs
The following tables set forth certain information regarding the production volumes and average sales prices received for, and average production costs associated with, our sales of oil and natural gas for the periods indicated.
|Years Ended December 31,|
Total production (2)
|Permian ||14,113 ||11,365 ||9,443 |
|Eagle Ford ||9,430 ||300 ||— |
|Total oil (MBbls)||23,543 ||11,665 ||9,443 |
|Natural gas (MMcf)|
|Permian ||32,087 ||19,484 ||15,477 |
|Eagle Ford||8,714 ||234 ||— |
|Total natural gas (MMcf)||40,801 ||19,718 ||15,447 |
|Permian ||5,390 ||93 ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||1,460 ||42 ||— |
|Total NGLs (MBbls)||6,850 ||135 ||— |
|Total production (MBoe)|
|Permian ||24,851 ||14,705 ||12,018 |
|Eagle Ford ||12,342 ||381 ||— |
|Total barrels of oil equivalent (MBoe)||37,193 ||15,086 ||12,018 |
Daily production volumes by product (2)
|Permian ||38,560 ||31,136 ||25,871 |
|Eagle Ford||25,765 ||821 ||— |
|Total oil (Bbls/d)||64,325 ||31,957 ||25,871 |
|Natural gas (Mcf/d)|
|Permian ||87,669 ||53,381 ||42,321 |
|Eagle Ford ||23,809 ||640 ||— |
|Total natural gas (Mcf/d)||111,478 ||54,021 ||42,321 |
|Permian ||14,727 ||254 ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||3,989 ||116 ||— |
|Total NGLs (Bbls/d)||18,716 ||370 ||— |
|Total production (Boe/d)|
|Permian ||67,899 ||40,287 ||32,926 |
|Eagle Ford ||33,721 ||1,044 ||— |
|Total barrels of oil equivalent (Boe/d)||101,620 ||41,331 ||32,926 |
|Years Ended December 31,|
Revenues (in thousands) (2)
|Permian ||$525,412 ||$615,235 ||$530,898 |
|Eagle Ford ||325,255 ||17,872 ||— |
|Total oil||850,667 ||633,107 ||530,898 |
|Permian ||33,815 ||35,818 ||56,726 |
|Eagle Ford ||18,051 ||572 ||— |
|Total natural gas||51,866 ||36,390 ||56,726 |
|Permian ||64,201 ||1,542 ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||17,094 ||533 ||— |
|Total NGLs||81,295 ||2,075 ||— |
|Permian ||623,428 ||652,595 ||587,624 |
|Eagle Ford ||360,400 ||18,977 ||— |
|Total revenues||$983,828 ||$671,572 ||$587,624 |
|Operating costs (in thousands)|
|Lease operating expense|
|Permian ||$117,017 ||$88,636 ||$69,180 |
|Eagle Ford ||77,084 ||3,191 ||— |
|Total lease operating expense||194,101 ||91,827 ||69,180 |
|Production and ad valorem taxes|
|Permian ||39,584 ||41,777 ||35,755 |
|Eagle Ford ||23,054 ||874 ||— |
|Total production and ad valorem taxes||62,638 ||42,651 ||35,755 |
|Gathering, transportation and processing|
|Permian ||56,856 ||— ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||20,453 ||— ||— |
|Total gathering, transportation and processing||77,309 ||— ||— |
|Total operating costs|
|Permian||213,457 ||130,413 ||104,935 |
|Eagle Ford ||120,591 ||4,065 ||— |
|Total operating costs||$334,048 ||$134,478 ||$104,935 |
|Years Ended December 31,|
Average realized sales price (2) (excluding impact of settled derivatives)
|Oil (per Bbl)|
|Permian||$37.23 ||$54.13 ||$56.22 |
|Eagle Ford ||34.49 ||59.57 ||— |
|Total oil (per Bbl)||36.13 ||54.27 ||56.22 |
|Natural gas (per Mcf)|
|Permian ||1.05 ||1.84 ||3.67 |
|Eagle Ford ||2.07 ||2.44 ||— |
|Total natural gas (per Mcf)||1.27 ||1.85 ||3.67 |
|NGL (per Bbl)|
|Permian ||11.91 ||16.58 ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||11.71 ||12.69 ||— |
|Total NGL (per Bbl)||11.87 ||15.37 ||— |
|Total average realized sales price (per Boe)|
|Permian ||25.09 ||44.38 ||48.90 |
|Eagle Ford ||29.20 ||49.81 ||— |
|Total average realized sales price (per Boe)||$26.45 ||$44.52 ||$48.90 |
Average realized sales price (2) (including impact of settled derivatives)
|Oil (per Bbl)||$40.19 ||$53.31 ||$53.31 |
|Natural gas (per Mcf)||1.28 ||2.22 ||3.69 |
|NGL (per Bbl)||11.87 ||15.37 ||— |
|Total average realized sales price (per Boe)||$29.03 ||$44.27 ||$46.63 |
|Operating costs per Boe|
|Lease operating expense|
|Permian ||$4.71 ||$6.03 ||$5.76 |
|Eagle Ford ||6.25 ||8.38 ||— |
|Total lease operating expense||5.22 ||6.09 ||5.76 |
|Production and ad valorem taxes|
|Permian ||1.59 ||2.84 ||2.98 |
|Eagle Ford ||1.87 ||2.29 ||— |
|Total production and ad valorem taxes||1.68 ||2.83 ||2.98 |
|Gathering, transportation and processing|
|Permian ||2.29 ||— ||— |
|Eagle Ford ||1.66 ||— ||— |
|Total gathering, transportation and processing||2.08 ||— ||— |
|Total operating costs|
|Permian ||8.59 ||8.87 ||8.74 |
|Eagle Ford ||9.77 ||10.67 ||— |
|Total operating costs (per Boe)||$8.98 ||$8.92 ||$8.74 |
(1) Includes activity on properties acquired in the Carrizo Acquisition subsequent to the December 20, 2019 closing date.
(2) Effective January 1, 2020, certain of our natural gas processing agreements were modified to allow us to take title to NGLs resulting from the processing of our natural gas. As a result, sales volumes, prices, and revenues for NGLs and natural gas are presented separately for periods subsequent to January 1, 2020. For periods prior to January 1, 2020, except for sales volumes, prices, and revenues specifically associated with Carrizo, we presented our sales volumes, prices, and revenues for NGLs with natural gas.
Our production is sold generally on month-to-month contracts at prevailing market prices. The following table presents customers that represented 10% or more of our total revenues for at least one of the periods presented:
|Years Ended December 31,|
|Shell Trading Company||31%||10%||*|
|Rio Energy International, Inc.||*||26%||28%|
|Enterprise Crude Oil, LLC||*||19%||14%|
|Plains Marketing, L.P.||*||15%||21%|
* - Less than 10% for the respective years.
Because alternative purchasers of oil and natural gas are readily available, we believe that the loss of any of these purchasers would not result in a material adverse effect on our ability to sell future oil and natural gas production. In order to mitigate potential exposure to credit risk, we may require from time to time for our customers to provide financial security.
The following table shows our approximate developed and undeveloped leasehold acreage as of December 31, 2020. Developed acreage refers to acreage on which wells have been completed to a point that would permit production of oil and gas in commercial quantities. Undeveloped acreage refers to acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit production of oil and gas in commercial quantities whether or not the acreage contains proved reserves.
|Developed Acreage||Undeveloped Acreage||Total Acreage||Net Undeveloped Acreage Expiring|
|121,099 ||100,645 ||9,250 ||5,726 ||130,349 ||106,371 ||1,839 ||1,510 ||83 |
Eagle Ford (2)
|77,830 ||65,311 ||12,249 ||8,372 ||90,079 ||73,683 ||47 ||300 ||8 |
|2,080 ||122 ||75,993 ||57,070 ||78,073 ||57,192 ||1,234 ||48,504 ||6,393 |
| Total||201,009 ||166,078 ||97,492 ||71,168 ||298,501 ||237,246 ||3,120 ||50,314 ||6,484 |
(1)Based on our current plans, approximately 56%, 2% and 24% of the acreage expiring in 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively, will be developed prior to expiration or extended by lease extension payments.
(2)Based on our current plans, approximately 100% of the acreage expiring in 2021, 2022 and 2023 will be developed prior to expiration or extended by lease extension payments.
(3)Consists of non-core acreage principally located in Texas. We have no current development plans and no proved undeveloped reserves associated with this acreage as of December 31, 2020.
Our lease agreements generally terminate if producing wells have not been drilled on the acreage within their primary term or an extension thereof (a period that is generally from three to five years depending on the area). The percentage of net undeveloped acreage expiring in 2021, 2022 and 2023 assumes that no producing wells have been drilled on acreage within their primary term or have been extended. We manage our lease expirations to ensure that we do not experience unintended material loss of acreage or depths. Our leasehold management efforts include scheduling drilling in order to hold leases by production or timely exercising our contractual rights to extend the terms of leases by continuous operations or the payment of lease extension payments and delay rentals. We may choose to allow some leases to expire that are no longer part of our development plans.
The proved undeveloped reserves associated with acreage expiring over the next three years are not material to the Company.
Callon employs a talented workforce that is integral to our success, and we are committed to the safety, health, and development of each team member. The Callon culture is defined by our values of responsibility, integrity, drive, respect and excellence. These core values are a reflection of our ideals as individuals and direct our actions as a company.
Callon’s key human capital management objectives are to attract, retain and develop talent to deliver on our strategy. Due to the technical nature of our business, our success depends on a highly skilled workforce in multiple disciplines including engineering, geology, operations, land, information technology and various other corporate functions. To support the attraction and retention of top talent, our human resources programs are designed to keep our employees safe and healthy, engage employees with an inclusive workplace, reward and support employees through competitive pay and benefit programs, and develop talent to prepare them for
critical roles and leadership positions. During 2020, our human capital priorities were focused on the post-merger integration of the Callon and Carrizo workforces and the health and safety of our employees as we adapted to the challenges of COVID-19.
As of December 31, 2020, Callon had 303 permanent, full-time employees. None of our employees are currently represented by a union, and we believe that we have good relations with our employees.
We focus on the following in supporting our human capital:
•Inclusion and Diversity - We believe that diversity of backgrounds and perspectives contributes to an innovative workforce and an enriching environment for our employees. Callon is firmly committed to fostering an inclusive, respectful environment and providing equal opportunity to all qualified persons in our hiring, development, and compensation practices. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 36% of our permanent, full-time employees represented minorities and 18% were female.
•Health and Safety - Protecting our employees, contractors and communities is a core value at Callon and our top priority. Our Operations Management System (“OMS”) establishes clear expectations for operating safely and responsibly throughout the lifecycle of our business. We identify and mitigate safety risks and integrate a culture of safety by operating according to OMS standards, processes, and procedures. Additionally, we share our Safety and Environmental Policy with all employees and contractors which includes each individual’s authorization and responsibility to stop work on any activity without the threat or fear of job reprisal. To reinforce accountability for safety results, our Board of Directors included safety performance as a factor in our 2020 annual bonus program. Importantly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, our continuing focus on health and safety enabled us to preserve business continuity without sacrificing our commitment to keeping our employees and their families safe.
•Employee Compensation, Benefits and Wellness - Our compensation and benefits programs provide a package designed to attract, retain and motivate employees. In addition to competitive base salaries, we provide a variety of short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs to reward performance relative to key financial and ESG metrics. Callon invests in the health and well-being of our employees and their families by paying 100% of the premiums for our health care plan, which includes telemedicine and an Employee Assistance Program. We also offer comprehensive benefit options including retirement savings plans, life and disability insurance, health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, and a charitable matching program.
•Employee Development - We believe that a key element in our future success, as well as the retention of our employees, is our investment in the development of our team members. Callon fosters an entrepreneurial workplace where employees can expand their skill sets and experience by direct engagement and collaboration with leaders at all levels. Additionally, we offer in-house training programs across our workforce and also invest in our emerging leaders by sponsoring them for prominent leadership development programs. Our development programs also focus on goal setting and feedback to support all of our employees in reaching their personal goals.
For additional information, please see our Sustainability Report published on our company website (www.callon.com). Information contained in our Sustainability Report is not incorporated by reference into, and does not constitute a part of, this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Industry Segment and Geographic Information
For segment reporting purposes, the Company considers all of the current development and operating areas to be one reportable segment: the development and production of oil and natural gas. All of the Company’s assets are located within the United States and all operations are located within Texas. All of the production revenues generated from operations are contracted and sold to customers located in the United States.
Title to Properties
The Company believes that the title to its oil and natural gas properties is good and defensible in accordance with standards generally accepted in the oil and gas industry, subject to such exceptions which, in our opinion, are not so material as to detract substantially from the use or value of such properties. Nevertheless, we can be involved in title disputes from time to time which may result in litigation. The Company’s properties are potentially subject to one or more of the following:
•royalties and other burdens and obligations, express or implied, under oil and natural gas leases;
•overriding royalties and other burdens created by us or our predecessors in title;
•a variety of contractual obligations (including, in some cases, development obligations) arising under operating agreements; farm-out agreements, production sales contracts and other agreements that may affect the properties or their titles;
•back-ins and reversionary interests existing under various agreements and as a result of unleased minerals or non-participating owners;
•liens that arise in the normal course of operations, such as those for unpaid taxes, statutory liens securing obligations to unpaid suppliers and contractors and contractual liens under operating agreements;
•pooling, unitization and communitization agreements, declarations and orders, production allocation agreements; and
•easements, restrictions, rights-of-way and other matters that commonly affect property.
To the extent that such burdens and obligations affect the Company’s rights to production revenues, these characteristics have been taken into account in calculating Callon’s net revenue interests and in estimating the size and value of its estimated proved reserves. The Company believes that the burdens and obligations affecting our properties are typical within the industry for properties of the kind owned by Callon.
Seasonality of Business
Weather conditions and seasonality affect the demand for and prices of, oil and natural gas. Due to these fluctuations, results of operations for quarterly interim periods may not be indicative of the results realized on an annual basis.
The Company operates in the oil and natural gas industry, which is highly competitive. The Company’s business experiences strong competition from a number of parties that may range from small independent producers to major integrated companies. Competition affects the Company’s ability to acquire additional properties and resources necessary to develop assets. In higher commodity pricing environments, competition also exists in the form of contracting for drilling, pumping, and workover equipment, and securing skilled personnel to both develop and operate existing assets. Many of the competitors mentioned above may be able to pay for more sought-after properties or access equipment, infrastructure, or personnel. The industry also experiences, from time to time, shortages in resources such as the availability of drilling and workover rigs, other equipment, pipes and materials, infrastructures, and skilled personnel, all of which can delay development, exploration, and workover activities as well as result in significant cost increases.
In accordance with industry practice, the Company maintains insurance against some, but not all, of the operating risks to which its business is exposed. While not all inclusive, the Company’s insurance policies generally protect against bodily injury and property damage, pollution and other environmental damages, employee benefits, employee injury and control of well insurance for its exploration and production operations.
The Company enters into master service agreements with its third-party contractors, including hydraulic fracturing contractors, in which they agree to indemnify the Company for injuries and deaths of the service provider’s employees, as well as contractors and subcontractors hired by the service provider. Similarly, the Company generally agrees to indemnify each third-party contractor against claims made by employees of the Company and the Company’s other contractors. Additionally, each party generally is responsible for damage to its own property. The Company re-evaluates the purchase of insurance, coverage limits and deductibles annually. Future insurance coverage for the oil and natural gas industry could increase in cost and may include higher deductibles or retentions. In addition, some forms of insurance may become unavailable in the future or unavailable on terms that are economically acceptable. While based on the Company’s risk analysis we believe that we are properly insured, no assurance can be given that the Company will be able to maintain insurance in the future at rates that it considers reasonable. In such circumstances, the Company may elect to self-insure or maintain only catastrophic coverage for certain risks in the future.
The Company’s headquarters are located in Houston, Texas, in a building with office space leased by the Company. We own office buildings in Dilley and Pecos, Texas and lease and own offices in the Midland, Texas area. Because alternative locations to our leased spaces are readily available, the replacement of any of our leased offices would not result in material expenditures.
General. Oil and natural gas operations such as ours are subject to various types of legislation, regulation and other legal requirements enacted by governmental authorities. Legislation and regulation affecting the entire oil and natural gas industry is continuously being reviewed for potential revision. Some of these requirements carry substantial penalties for failure to comply.
Exploration and Production. Our operations are subject to federal, state and local regulations that include requirements for permits to drill and to conduct other operations and for provision of financial assurances (such as bonds and letters of credit) covering drilling and well operations. Other activities subject to regulation are:
•the location and spacing of wells;
•the method of drilling and completing and operating wells;
•the rate and method of production;
•the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled and other exploration activities;
•notice to surface owners and other third parties;
•the venting or flaring of natural gas;
•the plugging and abandoning of wells;
•the discharge of contaminants into water and the emission of contaminants into air;
•the disposal of fluids used or other wastes obtained in connection with operations;
•the marketing, transportation and reporting of production; and
•the valuation and payment of royalties.
Our sales of oil and natural gas are affected by the availability, terms and cost of pipeline transportation. The price and terms for access to pipeline transportation remain subject to extensive federal and state regulation. If these regulations change, we could face higher transmission costs for our production and, possibly, reduced access to transmission capacity. To the extent it may be necessary for new interstate natural gas pipelines to be built, there may be a more stringent regulatory approach at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), which could impact our ability to obtain new interstate pipeline transportation capacity.
Various proposals and proceedings that might affect the petroleum industry are pending before Congress, federal administrative agencies such as FERC, various state and administrative agencies and legislatures, and the courts. Historically, the industry has been heavily regulated and we can offer you no assurance that the less stringent regulatory approach recently pursued by the FERC and state administrative agencies and Congress will continue nor can we predict what effect such proposals or proceedings may have on our operations.
We do not currently anticipate that compliance with existing laws and regulations governing exploration and production will have a significantly adverse effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Environmental Matters and Regulation. Our oil and natural gas exploration, development and production operations are subject to stringent laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Numerous federal, state and local governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), issue regulations which often require difficult and costly compliance measures. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit before drilling commences, restrict the types, quantities and concentrations of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit construction or drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness, wetlands, ecologically sensitive and other protected areas, require action to prevent or remediate pollution from current or former operations, such as plugging abandoned wells or closing pits, result in the suspension or revocation of necessary permits, licenses and authorizations, require that additional pollution controls be installed and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations or relating to our owned or operated facilities. Violations of environmental laws could result in administrative, civil or criminal fines and injunctive relief. The strict and joint and several liability nature of certain such laws and regulations could impose liability upon us regardless of fault. Moreover, it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances, hydrocarbons, air emissions or other waste products into the environment. Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that result in more stringent and costly pollution control or waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements could materially adversely affect our operations and financial position, as well as the oil and natural gas industry in general. In recent years, the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry has been the subject of increasing scrutiny and regulation by environmental authorities. Our management believes that we are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and we have not experienced any material adverse effect from compliance with these environmental requirements. Although such laws and regulations can increase the cost of planning, designing, installing and operating our facilities, it is anticipated that, absent the occurrence of an extraordinary event, compliance with them will not have a material effect upon our operations, capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position in the marketplace.
Waste Handling. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), as amended, and comparable state statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder, affect oil and natural gas exploration, development and production activities by imposing requirements regarding the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous and non-hazardous wastes. With federal approval, the individual states administer some or all of the provisions of RCRA, sometimes in conjunction with their own, more stringent requirements. Although most wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes under RCRA and its state analogs, it is possible that some wastes we generate presently or in the future may be subject to regulation under RCRA and state analogs. Additionally, we cannot assure you that the EPA or state or local governments will not adopt more stringent requirements for the handling of non-hazardous wastes or categorize some non-hazardous wastes as hazardous for future regulation. Indeed, legislation has been proposed from time to time in Congress to re-categorize certain oil and natural gas exploration, development and production wastes as “hazardous wastes.” Additionally, following the filing of a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in May 2016 by several non-governmental environmental groups against the EPA for the agency’s failure to timely assess its RCRA Subtitle D criteria regulations for oil and gas wastes, the EPA and the environmental groups entered into an agreement that was finalized in a consent decree issued by the District Court on December 28, 2016. Under the decree, the EPA was required to propose no later than March 15, 2019, a rulemaking for revision of certain Subtitle D criteria regulations pertaining to oil and gas wastes or sign a determination that revision of the regulations was not necessary. On April 23, 2019, the EPA determined that a revision of the regulations was not necessary. If the EPA proposes a
rulemaking for revised oil and gas waste regulations in the future, any such changes in the laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures and operating expenses.
Administrative, civil and criminal penalties can be imposed for failure to comply with waste handling requirements. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with applicable requirements related to waste handling, and that we hold all necessary and up-to-date permits, registrations and other authorizations to the extent that our operations require them under such laws and regulations. Although we do not believe the current costs of managing our wastes, as presently classified, to be significant, any legislative or regulatory reclassification of wastes associated with oil and natural gas exploration and production could increase our costs to manage and dispose of such wastes.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), imposes joint and several liability for costs of investigation and remediation and for natural resource damages without regard to fault or legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons with respect to the release into the environment of substances designated under CERCLA as hazardous substances. These classes of persons, or potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) include the current and past owners or operators of a site where the release occurred and anyone who disposed or arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance found at the site. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some instances, third parties to take actions in response to threats to public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the PRPs the costs of such action. Many states have adopted comparable or more stringent state statutes.
Although CERCLA generally exempts “petroleum” from the definition of hazardous substance, in the course of our operations, we have generated and will generate wastes that may fall within CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substance and may have disposed of these wastes at disposal sites owned and operated by others. Comparable state statutes may not provide a comparable exemption for petroleum. We may also be the owner or operator of sites on which hazardous substances have been released. To our knowledge, neither we nor our predecessors have been designated as a PRP by the EPA under CERCLA; we also do not know of any prior owners or operators of our properties that are named as PRPs related to their ownership or operation of such properties. In the event contamination is discovered at a site on which we are or have been an owner or operator or to which we sent hazardous substances, we could be liable for the costs of investigation and remediation and natural resources damages.
We currently own, lease, or operate numerous properties that have been used for oil and natural gas exploration and production for many years. Although we believe we have utilized operating, waste disposal, and water disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, hazardous substances, wastes or hydrocarbons may have been released on or under the properties owned or leased by us, or on or under other locations, including offsite locations, where such substances have been taken for disposal. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties or by previous owners or operators whose treatment and disposal of hazardous substances, wastes, or hydrocarbons were not under our control. These properties and the substances disposed or released on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws. In the future, we could be required to remediate property, including groundwater, containing or impacted by previously disposed wastes (including wastes disposed or released by prior owners or operators, or property contamination or groundwater contamination by prior owners or operators) or to perform remedial plugging operations to prevent future or mitigate existing contamination.
Water Discharges. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, also known as the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act (“OPA”), and analogous state laws and regulations promulgated thereunder impose restrictions and strict controls regarding the unauthorized discharge of pollutants, including produced waters and other gas and oil wastes, into navigable waters of the United States (a term broadly defined to include, among other things, certain wetlands), as well as state waters for analogous state programs. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or applicable state analog. The Clean Water Act and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit the discharge of dredge and fill material into regulated waters, including jurisdictional wetlands, unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The EPA issued a final rule on the federal jurisdictional reach over waters of the United States in 2015, which was repealed by the EPA on October 22, 2019. On January 23, 2020, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued the Navigable Waters Protection Rule re-defining the term “waters of the United States” as applied under the Clean Water Act and narrowing the scope of waters subject to federal regulation. The rule is the subject of various legal challenges, and a federal district court in Colorado stayed implementation of the rule. The stay is limited to application of the rule in Colorado; the rule has taken effect in all other states. At President Biden’s direction, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requested the litigation be stayed while the agencies review the rule. The ongoing litigation creates uncertainty regarding federal jurisdiction over waters of the United States.
The EPA has also adopted regulations requiring certain oil and natural gas exploration and production facilities to obtain individual permits or coverage under general permits for storm water discharges. Costs may be associated with the treatment of wastewater or developing and implementing storm water pollution prevention plans, as well as for monitoring and sampling the storm water runoff from certain of our facilities. Some states also maintain groundwater protection programs that require permits for discharges or operations that may impact groundwater conditions.
The Oil Pollution Act is the primary federal law for oil spill liability. The OPA contains numerous requirements relating to the prevention of and response to petroleum releases into waters of the United States, including the requirement that operators of offshore facilities and certain onshore facilities near or crossing waterways must develop and maintain facility response contingency plans and maintain certain significant levels of financial assurance to cover potential environmental cleanup and restoration costs. The OPA subjects owners of facilities to strict, joint and several liability for all containment and cleanup costs and certain other damages arising from a release, including, but not limited to, the costs of responding to a release of oil to surface waters.
Noncompliance with the Clean Water Act or the OPA may result in substantial administrative, civil and criminal penalties, as well as injunctive obligations. We believe we are in material compliance with the requirements of each of these laws.
Air Emissions. The federal Clean Air Act, as amended, and comparable state and local laws and regulations, regulate emissions of various air pollutants through the issuance of permits and the imposition of other requirements. The EPA has developed, and continues to develop, stringent regulations governing emissions of air pollutants at specified sources. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and modified and existing facilities may be required to obtain additional permits. As a result, we may need to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. Obtaining or renewing permits also has the potential to delay the development of oil and natural gas projects. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties and seek injunctive relief for non-compliance with air permits or other requirements of the federal Clean Air Act and associated state laws and regulations. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable air emissions regulations and that we hold all necessary and valid construction and operating permits for our operations.
On June 3, 2016, the EPA expanded its regulatory coverage in the oil and natural gas industry with additional regulated equipment categories, and the addition of new rules limiting methane emissions from new or modified sites and equipment. Although the EPA attempted to suspend enforcement of the methane rule, this action was ruled improper by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on July 2, 2017. Subsequently, in September 2020, the EPA finalized the Reconsideration Rule that substantially changed the obligations associated with methane emissions, limiting obligations for the oil and natural gas industry. On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order directing the EPA to rescind the Reconsideration Rule by September 2021. Separately, in September 2020, the EPA finalized amendments known as the Review Rule that would rescind requirements related to the regulation of methane emissions from the oil and natural gas industry. Both rules are subject to ongoing litigation, and therefore, future obligations continue to remain uncertain under the Clean Air Act.
Climate Change. Numerous reports from scientific and governmental bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have expressed heightened concerns about the impacts of human activity, especially fossil fuel combustion, on the global climate. In turn, governments and civil society are increasingly focused on limiting the emissions of GHGs, including emissions of carbon dioxide from the use of oil and natural gas.
In December 2015, the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change resulted in 195 countries, including the United States, coming together to develop the so-called “Paris Agreement,” which calls for the parties to undertake “ambitious efforts” to limit the average global temperature. The Agreement went into effect on November 4, 2016, and establishes a framework for the parties to cooperate and report actions to reduce GHG emissions. The United States formally announced its intent to withdraw from the Paris Agreement on November 4, 2019, which withdrawal was effective on November 4, 2020. On January 20, 2021, President Biden issued written notification to the United Nations of the United States’ intention to rejoin the Paris Agreement, which became effective on February 19, 2021. In addition, certain U.S. city and state governments announced their intention to continue to satisfy their proportionate obligations under the Paris Agreement. In addition, legislation has from time to time been introduced in Congress that would establish measures restricting GHG emissions in the United States, and a number of states have begun taking actions to control and/or reduce emissions of GHGs.
Any legislation or regulatory programs at the federal, state, or city levels designed to reduce GHG emissions could increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the oil and natural gas we produce. Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHGs could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, incentives to conserve energy or use alternative energy sources, such as policies designed to increase utilization of zero-emissions or electric vehicles, as a means of addressing climate change could reduce demand for the oil and natural gas we produce.
In the absence of comprehensive federal legislation on GHG emission control, the EPA attempted to require the permitting of GHG emissions. Although the Supreme Court struck down the permitting requirements, it upheld the EPA’s authority to control GHG emissions when a permit is required due to emissions of other pollutants.
The EPA has established GHG reporting requirements for certain sources in the petroleum and natural gas industry, requiring those sources to monitor, maintain records on, and annually report their GHG emissions. Although these requirements do not limit the amount of GHGs that can be emitted, they do require us to incur costs to monitor, keep records of, and report GHG emissions associated with our operations.
Parties concerned about the potential effects of climate change have also directed their attention at sources of financing for energy companies, which has resulted in certain financial institutions, funds and other capital providers restricting or eliminating their
investment in oil and natural gas activities. In addition, some parties have initiated public nuisance claims under federal or state common law against certain companies involved in the production of oil and natural gas. Although our business is not a party to any such litigation, we could be named in actions making similar allegations, which could lead to costs and materially impact our financial condition in an adverse way.
Finally, most scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of droughts, storms, floods and other climatic events. If any such effects were to occur, they could adversely affect or delay demand for the oil or natural gas produced or cause us to incur significant costs in preparing for or responding to the effects of climatic events themselves. Potential adverse effects could include disruption of our production activities, including, for example, damages to our facilities from winds or floods or increases in our costs of operation or reductions in the efficiency of our operations, as well as potentially increased costs for insurance coverages in the aftermath of such effects.
Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing. Hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from tight formations, including shales. The process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into formations to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. The federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) regulates the underground injection of substances through the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program. Hydraulic fracturing is generally exempt from regulation under the UIC program, and the hydraulic fracturing process is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions and not at the federal level, as the SDWA expressly excludes regulation of these fracturing activities (except where diesel is a component of the fracturing fluid, as further discussed below). Legislation to amend the SDWA to repeal the exemption for hydraulic fracturing from the definition of “underground injection” and require federal permitting and regulatory control of hydraulic fracturing has been proposed in past legislative sessions but has not passed.
The EPA, however, issued guidance on permitting hydraulic fracturing that uses fluids containing diesel fuel under the UIC program, specifically as “Class II” UIC wells. In December 2016, the EPA released its final report on the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources, concluding that “water cycle” activities associated with hydraulic fracturing may impact drinking water resources “under some circumstances,” including water withdrawals for fracturing in times or areas of low water availability; surface spills during the management of fracturing fluids, chemicals or produced water; injection of fracturing fluids into wells with inadequate mechanical integrity; injection of fracturing fluids directly into groundwater resources; discharge of inadequately treated fracturing wastewater to surface waters; and disposal or storage of fracturing wastewater in unlined pits. This report could result in additional regulatory scrutiny that could make it more difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing and increase our costs of compliance and business. Further, on June 28, 2016, the EPA published an effluent limit guideline final rule prohibiting the discharge of wastewater from onshore unconventional oil and natural gas extraction facilities to publicly owned wastewater treatment plants, and after a legal challenge by environmental groups, in July 2019, the EPA declined to revise the rules.
On June 3, 2016, the EPA adopted regulations under the federal Clean Air Act that establish new air emission controls for oil and natural gas production and natural gas processing operations. Specifically, the EPA’s rule package included New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) for hydraulically fractured natural gas and oil wells to address emissions of sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) and methane, with a separate set of emission standards to address hazardous air pollutants frequently associated with oil and natural gas production and processing activities. The final rule sought to achieve a 95% reduction in VOCs and methane emitted by requiring the use of reduced emission completions or “green completions” on all hydraulically-fractured gas and newly constructed or refractured oil wells.
Several states, including Texas, and some municipalities, have adopted, or are considering adopting, regulations that could restrict or prohibit hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances and/or require the disclosure of the composition of hydraulic fracturing fluids. For example, Texas law requires that the well operator disclose the list of chemical ingredients subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) for disclosure on a website and also file the list of chemicals with the Texas Railroad Commission (the “RRC”) with the well completion report. The total volume of water used to hydraulically fracture a well must also be disclosed to the public and filed with the RRC.
Additionally, some states, localities and local regulatory districts have adopted or have considered adopting regulations to limit, and in some cases impose a moratorium on, hydraulic fracturing or other restrictions on drilling and completion operations, including requirements regarding casing and cementing of wells; testing of nearby water wells; or restrictions on access to, and usage of, water. Further, there has been increasing public controversy regarding hydraulic fracturing with regard to the use of fracturing fluids, impacts on drinking water supplies, use of water and the potential for impacts to surface water, groundwater and the environment generally. A number of lawsuits and enforcement actions have been initiated across the U.S. implicating hydraulic fracturing practices. If new laws or regulations that significantly restrict hydraulic fracturing are adopted, such laws could make it more difficult or costly for us to perform fracturing to stimulate production from tight formations as well as make it easier for third parties opposing the hydraulic fracturing process to initiate legal proceedings based on allegations of harm. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing is further regulated at the federal or state level, our fracturing activities could become subject to additional permitting and financial assurance requirements, more stringent construction specifications, increased monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping obligations, plugging and
abandonment requirements and also to attendant permitting delays and potential increases in costs. Such legislative changes could cause us to incur substantial compliance costs, and compliance or the consequences of any failure to comply by us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. At this time, it is not possible to estimate the impact on our business of potential federal or state legislation governing hydraulic fracturing. In light of concerns about seismic activity being triggered by the injection of produced waters into underground wells, certain regulators are also considering additional requirements related to seismic safety for hydraulic fracturing activities. A 2015 U.S. Geological Survey report identified eight states with areas of increased rates of induced seismicity that could be attributed to fluid injection or oil and gas extraction. Any regulation that restricts our ability to dispose of produced waters or increases the cost of doing business could cause curtailed or decreased demand for our services and have a material adverse effect on our business.
Surface Damage Statutes (“SDAs”). In addition, a number of states and some tribal nations have enacted SDAs. These laws are designed to compensate for damage caused by oil and gas development operations. Most SDAs contain entry notification and negotiation requirements to facilitate contact between operators and surface owners/users. Most also contain binding requirements for payments by the operator to surface owners/users in connection with exploration and operating activities in addition to bonding requirements to compensate for damages to the surface as a result of such activities. Costs and delays associated with SDAs could impair operational effectiveness and increase development costs.
National Environmental Policy Act. Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities requiring federal permits may be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), which requires federal agencies to evaluate major agency actions having the potential to significantly impact the environment. In the course of such evaluations, an agency will evaluate the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of a proposed project and, if necessary, will prepare a detailed Environmental Impact Statement that must be made available for public review and comment. Recent litigation by environmental non-governmental organizations has alleged that the Environmental Assessments for certain oil and natural gas projects violated NEPA by failing to account for climate change and the greenhouse gas emissions impacts of such projects. On July 16, 2020, the Council on Environmental Quality revised NEPA’s implementing regulations in an effort designed to streamline project approvals. Among other revisions, the rules redefines environmental “effects” or “impacts” as the effects “that are reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close causal relationship to the proposed action or alternatives.” The rule also eliminated the current “direct,” “indirect,” or “cumulative” categories of effects. The new regulations are subject to ongoing litigation in several federal district courts and future implementation of the regulations is unclear. To the extent that our current exploration and production activities, as well as proposed exploration and development plans, require federal permits that are subject to the requirements of NEPA, this process has the potential to delay or impose additional conditions upon the development of oil and natural gas projects.
Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) was established to protect endangered and threatened species. Pursuant to that act, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered, restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that species’ or its habitat. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the “FWS”) must also designate the species’ critical habitat and suitable habitat as part of the effort to ensure survival of the species. In August 2019, the FWS and National Marine Fisheries Service issued three rules amending implementation of the ESA regulations revising, among other things, the process for listing species and designating critical habitat. A coalition of states and environmental groups have challenged the three rules and the litigation remains pending. In addition, on December 18, 2020, the FWS amended its regulations governing critical habitat designations. We anticipate the rule will be subject to litigation. A final rule amending how critical habitat and suitable habitat areas are designated under the ESA was finalized by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2016. A critical habitat or suitable habitat designation could result in further material restrictions to land use and may materially delay or prohibit land access for oil and natural gas development. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (the “MBTA”), which makes it illegal to, among other things, hunt, capture, kill, possess, sell, or purchase migratory birds, nests, or eggs without a permit. This prohibition covers most bird species in the U.S. On January 7, 2021, the Department of the Interior finalized a rule limiting application of the MBTA, however, the Department of the Interior under President Biden delayed the effective date of the rule and opened a public comment period for further review. Future implementation of the rules implementing the Endangered Species Act and the MBTA are uncertain. If the Company was to have a portion of its leases designated as critical or suitable habitat or a protected species were located on a lease, it may adversely impact the value of the affected leases.
Other Regulation of the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. The oil and natural gas industry is extensively regulated by numerous federal, state and local agencies and authorities. Legislation affecting the oil and natural gas industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion, frequently increasing the regulatory burden. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue rules and regulations that are binding on the oil and natural gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Although the regulatory burden on the oil and natural gas industry increases our cost of doing business and, consequently, affects our profitability, these burdens generally do not affect us any differently or to any greater or lesser extent than they affect other similar companies in the industry with similar types, quantities and locations of production.
The availability, terms and cost of transportation significantly affect sales of oil and natural gas. The interstate transportation of oil and natural gas is subject to federal regulation by FERC which regulates the terms, conditions and rates for interstate transportation and
storage service and various other matters. State regulations govern the rates, terms, and conditions of service associated with access to intrastate oil and natural gas pipeline transportation. FERC’s regulations for interstate oil and natural gas transportation in some circumstances may also affect the intrastate transportation of oil and natural gas.
Although oil and natural gas sales prices are currently unregulated, the federal government historically has been active in the area of oil and natural gas sales regulation. We cannot predict whether new legislation to regulate oil and natural gas sales might be proposed, what proposals, if any, might actually be enacted by Congress or the various state legislatures, and what effect, if any, the proposals might have on our operations. Sales of natural gas, condensate, oil and natural gas liquids are not currently regulated and are made at market prices.
Exports of U.S. Oil Production and Natural Gas Production. In December 2015, the federal government ended its decades-old prohibition of exports of oil produced in the lower 48 states of the U.S. As a result, exports of U.S. oil have increased significantly, reinforcing the general perception in the industry that the end of the U.S. export ban was positive for producers of U.S. oil. In addition, the U.S. Department of Energy authorizes exports of natural gas, including exports of natural gas by pipelines connecting U.S. natural gas production to pipelines in Mexico, and the export of liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) through LNG export facilities, the construction and operation of which are regulated by FERC. Since 2016, natural gas produced in the lower 48 states of the U.S. has been exported as LNG from export facilities in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. LNG export capacity has steadily increased in recent years, and is expected to continue increasing due to numerous export facilities that are currently being developed. The industry generally believes that this sustained growth in exports will be a positive development for producers of U.S. natural gas.
Drilling and Production. Our operations are subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local level. These types of regulation include requiring permits for the drilling of wells, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations. The state, and some counties and municipalities, in which we operate also regulate one or more of the following:
•the location of wells;
•the method of drilling and casing wells;
•the timing of construction or drilling activities, including seasonal wildlife closures;
•the rates of production or “allowables”;
•the surface use and restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled;
•the plugging and abandoning of wells; and
•notice to, and consultation with, surface owners and other third parties.
State laws regulate the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units governing the pooling of oil and natural gas properties. Some states allow forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In some instances, forced pooling or unitization may be implemented by third parties and may reduce our interest in the unitized properties. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas without a permit and impose requirements regarding the ratability of production. These laws and regulations may limit the amount of oil and natural gas we can produce from our wells or limit the number of wells or the locations at which we can drill. Moreover, each state generally imposes a production or severance tax with respect to the production and sale of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids within its jurisdiction. States do not regulate wellhead prices or engage in other similar direct regulation, but we cannot assure you that they will not do so in the future. The effect of such future regulations may be to limit the amounts of oil and natural gas that may be produced from our wells, negatively affecting the economics of production from these wells or to limit the number of locations we can drill.
Federal, state and local regulations provide detailed requirements for the abandonment of wells, closure or decommissioning of production facilities and pipelines and for site restoration in areas where we operate. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and many other state and local authorities also have regulations for plugging and abandonment, decommissioning and site restoration. Some state agencies and municipalities require bonds or other financial assurances to support those obligations.
Natural Gas Sales and Transportation. Historically, federal legislation and regulatory controls have affected the price of the natural gas we produce and the manner in which we market our production and have it transported. FERC has jurisdiction over the transportation and sale for resale of natural gas in interstate commerce by natural gas companies under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (“NGA”) and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (“NGPA”). Since 1978, various federal laws have been enacted which have resulted in the complete removal of all price and non-price controls for “first sales,” which include all of our sales of our own production.
Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct”) Congress amended the NGA and NGPA to give FERC substantial enforcement authority to prohibit the manipulation of natural gas markets and enforce its rules and orders, including the ability to assess civil penalties up to $1.0 million per day for each violation. This maximum penalty authority has been and will continue to be adjusted periodically to account for inflation. EPAct also amended the NGA to authorize FERC to “facilitate transparency in markets for the sale or transportation of physical natural gas in interstate commerce,” pursuant to which authorization FERC now requires natural gas wholesale market participants, including a number of entities that may not otherwise be subject to FERC’s traditional NGA jurisdiction, to report information annually to FERC concerning their natural gas sales and purchases. FERC requires any wholesale
market participant that sells 2.2 million MMBtus or more annually in “reportable” natural gas sales to provide a report, known as FERC Form 552, to FERC. Reportable natural gas sales include sales of natural gas that utilize a daily or monthly gas price index, contribute to index price formation, or could contribute to index price formation, such as fixed price transactions for next-day or next-month delivery.
FERC also regulates interstate natural gas transportation rates, terms and conditions of service, and the terms under which we as a shipper may use interstate natural gas pipeline capacity, which affects the marketing of natural gas that we produce, as well as the revenues we receive for sales of our natural gas and for the release of our excess, if any, natural gas pipeline capacity. In 1985, FERC began promulgating a series of orders, regulations and rule makings that significantly fostered competition in the business of transporting and marketing gas. Today, interstate natural gas pipeline companies are required to provide non-unduly discriminatory transportation services to all shippers, regardless of whether such shippers are affiliated with an interstate pipeline company. FERC’s initiatives have led to the development of a competitive, open access market for natural gas purchases, sales, and transportation that permits all purchasers of natural gas to buy gas directly from third-party sellers other than pipelines. However, the natural gas industry historically has been very heavily regulated. With the new administration, we are expecting a reversal of the less stringent regulatory approach pursued by FERC and Congress during the Trump administration. Additionally, we cannot determine what effect, if any, future regulatory changes might have on our natural gas related activities.
Under FERC’s current regulatory regime, interstate transportation services must be provided on an open-access, non-unduly discriminatory basis at cost-based rates or negotiated rates, both of which are subject to FERC approval. FERC also allows jurisdictional gas pipeline companies to charge market-based rates if the transportation market at issue is sufficiently competitive. The FERC-regulated tariffs, under which interstate pipelines provide such open-access transportation service, contain strict limits on the means by which a shipper releases its pipeline capacity to another potential shipper, which provisions include compliance with FERC’s “shipper-must-have-title” rule. Violations by a shipper (i.e., a pipeline customer) of FERC’s capacity release rules, including the shipper-must-have-title rule could subject a shipper to substantial penalties from FERC.
With respect to its regulation of natural gas pipelines under the NGA, FERC has not generally required the applicant for construction of a new interstate natural gas pipeline to provide information concerning the GHG emissions resulting from the activities of the proposed pipeline’s customers. In August 2017, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit issued a decision remanding a natural gas pipeline certificate application to FERC, and required FERC to revise its environmental impact statement for the proposed pipeline to analyze potential GHG emission from the specific downstream power plants that the pipeline was designed to serve. To date, FERC has declined to analyze potential upstream GHG emissions that could result from the activities of natural gas producers and marketers, like the Company, to be served by proposed interstate natural gas pipeline projects. However, the scope of FERC’s obligation to analyze the environmental impacts of proposed interstate natural gas pipeline projects, including the upstream indirect impacts of related natural gas production activity, remains subject to ongoing litigation and contested administrative proceedings at FERC and in the courts.
Gathering service, which occurs on pipeline facilities located upstream of FERC-jurisdictional interstate transportation services, is regulated by the states onshore and in state waters. Under NGA section 1(b), gathering facilities are exempt from FERC’s jurisdiction. FERC has set forth a general test for determining whether facilities perform a non-jurisdictional gathering function or a jurisdictional transmission function, and FERC applies this test on a case-by-case basis. Depending on changes in the function performed by particular pipeline facilities, FERC has in the past reclassified certain FERC-jurisdictional transportation facilities as non-jurisdictional gathering facilities and FERC has reclassified certain non-jurisdictional gathering facilities as FERC-jurisdictional transportation facilities. Any such changes could result in an increase to our costs of transporting gas to point-of-sale locations.
The pipelines used to gather and transport natural gas being produced by the Company are also subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”) under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended, the Pipeline Safety Act of 1992, as reauthorized and amended (“Pipeline Safety Act”), and the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011. The DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (“PHMSA”) has established a risk-based approach to determine which gathering pipelines are subject to regulation and what safety standards regulated gathering pipelines must meet. In addition, PHMSA had initially considered regulations regarding, among other things, the designation of additional high consequence areas along pipelines, minimum requirements for leak detection systems, installation of emergency flow restricting devices, and revision of valve spacing requirements. In October 2019, PHMSA finalized new safety regulations for hazardous liquid pipelines, including a requirement that operators inspect affected pipelines following extreme weather events or natural disasters, that all hazardous liquid pipelines have a system for detecting leaks and that pipelines in high consequence areas be capable of accommodating in-line inspection tools within twenty years. In addition, PHMSA is in the process of finalizing a rulemaking with respect to gathering lines, but the contents and timing of any final rule for gathering lines are uncertain. In December 2020, Congress passed the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (“PIPES Act of 2020”). In addition to reauthorizing PHMSA, the PIPES Act of 2020 directs the Secretary of Transportation to update or promulgate regulations addressing the safety of certain gas pipeline, gathering, distribution and LNG facilities. Until these future regulations are proposed, it is not possible to determine how they will affect our business.
Oil and NGLs Sales and Transportation. Sales of oil, condensate and natural gas liquids are not currently regulated and are made at negotiated prices. Nevertheless, Congress could reenact price controls in the future.
The Company’s sales of oil and natural gas liquids are also affected by the availability, terms and costs of transportation. The rates, terms, and conditions applicable to the interstate transportation of oil and natural gas liquids by pipelines are regulated by FERC under the Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”). FERC has implemented a simplified and generally applicable ratemaking methodology for interstate oil and natural gas liquids pipelines to fulfill the requirements of Title XVIII of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 comprised of an indexing system to establish ceilings on interstate oil and natural gas liquids pipeline rates. Intrastate oil pipeline transportation rates are subject to regulation by state regulatory commissions. The basis for intrastate oil pipeline regulation, and the degree of regulatory oversight and scrutiny given to intrastate oil pipeline rates, varies from state to state. Insofar as effective interstate and intrastate rates are equally applicable to all comparable shippers, we believe that the regulation of oil and natural gas liquid transportation rates will not affect our operations in any materially different way than such regulation will affect the operations of our competitors.
Further, interstate common carrier oil pipelines must provide service on a non-duly discriminatory basis under the ICA, which is administered by FERC. Under this open access standard, common carriers must offer service to all shippers requesting service on the same terms and under the same rates. When oil pipelines operate at full capacity, access is governed by prorationing provisions set forth in the pipelines’ published tariffs. Accordingly, we believe that access to oil pipeline transportation services generally will be available to us to the same extent as to our competitors.
In addition, FERC issued a declaratory order in November 2017, involving a marketing affiliate of an oil pipeline, which held that certain arrangements between an oil pipeline and its marketing affiliate would violate the ICA’s anti-discrimination provisions. FERC held that providing transportation service to affiliates at what is essentially the variable cost of the movement, while requiring non-affiliated shippers to pay the filed tariff rate, would violate the ICA. Rehearing has been sought of this FERC order by various parties. Due to the pending rehearing of the order and its recency, the Company cannot currently determine the impact this FERC order may have on oil pipelines, their marketing affiliates, and the price of oil and other liquids transported by such pipelines.
Any transportation of the Company’s oil, natural gas liquids and purity components (ethane, propane, butane, iso-butane, and natural gasoline) by rail is also subject to regulation by the DOT’s PHMSA and the DOT’s Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) under the Hazardous Materials Regulations at 49 CFR Parts 171-180, including Emergency Orders by the FRA regulations initially established on May 8, 2015 by PHMSA, arising due to the consequences of train accidents and the increase in the rail transportation of flammable liquids; PHMSA regulations were subsequently amended to remove certain requirements on September 25, 2018. In July 2020, PHMSA promulgated a final rule allowing bulk transportation of LNG by rail. The rule also incorporates additional safety requirements.
State Regulation. Texas regulates the drilling for, and the production, gathering and sale of, oil and natural gas, including imposing severance taxes and requirements for obtaining drilling permits. Texas currently imposes a 4.6% severance tax on oil production and a 7.5% severance tax on natural gas production. States also regulate the method of developing new fields, the spacing and operation of wells and the prevention of waste of oil and natural gas resources. States may regulate rates of production and may establish maximum daily production allowables from oil and natural gas wells based on market demand or resource conservation, or both. States do not regulate wellhead prices or engage in other similar direct economic regulation, but we cannot assure you that they will not do so in the future. The effect of these regulations may be to limit the amount of oil and natural gas that may be produced from our wells and to limit the number of wells or locations we can drill.
The petroleum industry is also subject to compliance with various other federal, state and local regulations and laws. Some of those laws relate to resource conservation and equal employment opportunity. We do not believe that compliance with these laws will have a material adverse effect on us.
Financial Regulations, Including Regulations Enacted Under the Dodd-Frank Act. The U.S. Commodities and Futures Exchange Commission (the “CFTC”) holds authority to monitor certain segments of the physical and futures energy commodities market including oil and natural gas. With regard to physical purchases and sales of natural gas and other energy commodities, and any related hedging activities that the Company undertakes, the Company is thus required to observe anti-market manipulation and disruptive trading practices laws and related regulations enforced by FERC and/or the CFTC. The CFTC also holds substantial enforcement authority, including the ability to assess civil penalties.
Congress adopted comprehensive financial reform legislation in 2010, establishing federal oversight and regulation of the over-the-counter derivative market and entities that participate in that market. The legislation, known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), required the CFTC and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to promulgate rules and regulations implementing the legislation, including regulations that affect derivatives contracts that the Company uses to hedge its exposure to price volatility.
While the CFTC and the SEC have issued final regulations in certain areas, final rules in other areas remain pending. The Company cannot, at this time, predict the timing or contents of any final rules the CFTC may enact with regard to any applicable rulemaking
proceeding. Any final rule in either proceeding could impact the Company’s ability to enter into financial derivative transactions to hedge or mitigate exposure to commodity price volatility and other commercial risks affecting our business.
Worker Health and Safety. We are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations, including OSHA, and comparable state statutes, the purpose of which are to protect the health and safety of workers. In 2016, there were substantial revisions to the regulations under OSHA that may have impact to our operations. These changes include among other items; record keeping and reporting, revised crystalline silica standard (which requires the oil and gas industry to implement engineering controls and work practices to limit exposures below the new limits by June 23, 2021), naming oil and gas as a high hazard industry and requirements for a safety and health management system. In addition, OSHA’s hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable state statutes require that information be maintained concerning hazardous materials used or produced in our operations, and that this information be provided to employees, state and local government authorities and citizens.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company’s activities are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. Although no assurances can be made, the Company believes that, absent the occurrence of an extraordinary event, compliance with existing federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations governing the release of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment will not have a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or the competitive position of the Company with respect to its existing assets and operations. The Company cannot predict what effect additional regulation or legislation, enforcement policies included, and claims for damages to property, employees, other persons, and the environment resulting from the Company’s operations could have on its activities. See “Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
We make available free of charge on our website (www.callon.com) our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other filings pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and amendments to such filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after each are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
We also make available within the “About Callon” section of our website our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and Audit, Compensation, Strategic Planning and Reserves, and Nominating, Environmental, Social and Governance Committee Charters, which have been approved by our Board of Directors. We will make timely disclosure on our website of any change to, or waiver from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our principal executive and senior financial officers. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is also available, free of charge by writing us at: General Counsel, Callon Petroleum Company, 2000 W. Sam Houston Parkway South, Suite 2000, Houston, TX 77042.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Risks Related to the Oil & Natural Gas Industry
Oil and natural gas prices are volatile, and substantial or extended declines in prices may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Our success is highly dependent on prices for oil and natural gas, which have in recent years been, and we expect will continue to be, extremely volatile. During the five years ended December 31, 2020, NYMEX WTI prices ranged from a high of $77.41 per barrel on June 27, 2018 to a low of -$36.98 per barrel on April 20, 2020, and NYMEX Henry Hub prices ranged from a high of $6.24 per MMBtu on January 2, 2018 to a low of $1.33 per MMBtu on September 21, 2020. Prices were particularly volatile in 2020 as a result of multiple significant factors impacting supply and demand in the global oil and natural gas markets, including those relating to the COVID-19 global pandemic. In 2020, NYMEX WTI crude oil ranged from a high of $63.27 per barrel to a low of -$36.98 per barrel, and the Henry Hub spot market price of gas ranged from a high of $3.14 per MMBtu to a low of $1.33 per MMBtu. The prices of oil and natural gas depend on factors we cannot control, such as macro-economic conditions, levels of production, domestic and worldwide inventories, demand for oil and natural gas, the capacity of U.S. and international refiners to use U.S. supplies of oil, natural gas and NGLs, relative price and availability of alternative forms of energy, actions by non-governmental organizations, OPEC and other countries, legislative and regulatory actions, technology developments impacting energy consumption and energy supply, and weather. These factors make it extremely difficult to predict future oil, natural gas and NGLs price movements with any certainty. We make price assumptions that are used for planning purposes, and a significant portion of our cash outlays, including rent, salaries and non-cancelable capital commitments, are largely fixed in nature. Accordingly, if commodity prices are below the expectations on which these commitments were based, our financial results are likely to be adversely and disproportionately affected because these cash outlays are not variable in the short term and cannot be quickly reduced to respond to unanticipated decreases in commodity prices.
In general, prices of oil, natural gas, and NGLs affect the following aspects of our business: our revenues, cash flows, earnings and returns; our ability to attract capital to finance our operations and the cost of the capital; the amount we are allowed to borrow under our Credit Facility; the profit or loss we incur in exploring for and developing our reserves; and the value of our oil and natural gas properties.
A substantial or extended decline in commodity prices may also reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce economically and cause a significant portion of our development projects to become uneconomic. This may result in our having to make significant downward adjustments to our estimated proved reserves. A reduction in production could also result in a shortfall in expected cash flows and require us to reduce capital spending, which could negatively affect our ability to replace our production and our future rate of growth, or require us to borrow funds to cover any such shortfall, which we may be unable to obtain at such time on satisfactory terms.
Due to the commodity price environment, in 2020, we reduced our development plan in order to preserve capital, including the temporary cessation of all drilling and completion activities for most of the second and third quarters of 2020. A sustained period of weakness in oil, natural gas and NGLs prices, and the resultant effects of such prices on our drilling economics and ability to raise capital, will require us to reevaluate and further postpone or eliminate additional drilling. Additionally, as of December 31, 2020, approximately 30% of our total net acreage was not held by production and we had undeveloped leases representing 1% and 21% of our total net acreage scheduled to expire during 2021 and 2022, respectively, in each case assuming no exercise of lease extension options where applicable. The net acreage scheduled to expire in 2022 is substantially comprised of non-core acreage principally located in Texas. If we are required to further curtail our drilling program, we may be unable to continue to hold such leases that are scheduled to expire, which may further reduce our reserves. As a result, if oil, natural gas and/or NGL prices experience a sustained period of weakness, our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to finance planned capital expenditures may be materially and adversely affected.
If oil and natural gas prices remain depressed for extended periods of time, we may be required to make significant downward adjustments to the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties. Under the full cost method, which we use to account for our oil and natural gas properties, the net capitalized costs of our oil and natural gas properties may not exceed the PV-10 of our estimated proved reserves, using the 12-Month Average Realized Price, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of our unproved properties. If such net capitalized costs exceed this limit, we must charge the amount of the excess to earnings. This type of charge will not affect our cash flows, but will reduce the book value of our stockholders’ equity. We review the carrying value of our properties quarterly and once incurred, an impairment of evaluated oil and natural gas properties is not reversible at a later date, even if prices increase. See “Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements as well as the Supplemental Information on Oil and Natural Gas Operations for additional information.
A negative shift in investor sentiment of the oil and gas industry could adversely affect our ability to raise debt and equity capital. Certain segments of the investor community have developed negative sentiment towards investing in our industry. Recent equity returns in the sector versus other industry sectors have led to lower oil and gas representation in certain key equity market indices. In addition, some investors, including investment advisors and certain sovereign wealth funds, pension funds, university endowments and family foundations, have stated policies to disinvest in the oil and gas sector based on their social and environmental considerations. Certain other stakeholders have also pressured commercial and investment banks to stop financing oil and gas production and related infrastructure projects. Such developments, including environmental activism and initiatives aimed at limiting
climate change and reducing air pollution, could result in downward pressure on the stock prices of oil and gas companies, including ours. This may also potentially result in a reduction of available capital funding for potential development projects, impacting our future financial results.
We face various risks associated with increased activism against oil and natural gas exploration and development activities. Opposition toward oil and natural gas drilling and development activity has been growing globally and is particularly pronounced in the United States. Companies in the oil and natural gas industry are often the target of activist efforts from both individuals and non- governmental organizations regarding safety, human rights, climate change, environmental matters, sustainability, and business practices. Anti-development activists are working to, among other things, reduce access to federal and state government lands and delay or cancel certain operations such as drilling and development.
The unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, pressure pumping equipment and crews, other equipment, supplies, water, personnel and oil field services could adversely affect our ability to execute our exploration and development plans on a timely basis and within our budget, which could materially and adversely affect our operations and profitability. From time to time, our industry experiences a shortage of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, water or qualified personnel. During these periods, the costs and delivery times of rigs, equipment and supplies are substantially greater. In addition, during periods in which the levels of exploration and production increase, the demand for, and wages and costs of, drilling rig crews and other experienced personnel, oilfield services and equipment typically also increase, while the quality of these services and equipment may suffer.
An excess supply of oil and natural gas may in the future cause us to reduce production and shut-in our wells, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to finance planned capital expenditures. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of actions by, or disputes among or between, oil and natural gas producing countries, there is an excess supply of oil, NGLs, and natural gas in the United States, which could continue for a sustained period. This excess supply, in turn, resulted in transportation and storage capacity constraints in the United States in 2020. If, in the future, our transportation or storage arrangements become constrained or unavailable, we may incur significant operational costs if there is an increase in price for services or we may be required to shut-in or curtail production or flare our natural gas. If we were required to shut-in wells, we might also be obligated to pay certain demand charges for gathering and processing services and firm transportation charges for pipeline capacity we have reserved. Further, any prolonged shut-in of our wells may result in materially decreased well productivity once we are able to resume operations, and any cessation of drilling and development of our acreage could result in the expiration, in whole or in part, of our leases. All of these impacts may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and ability to finance planned capital expenditures.
Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic, and various governmental actions taken to mitigate its impact, have materially adversely affected, and any future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases may materially adversely affect, our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The COVID-19 pandemic, and various governmental actions taken to mitigate its impact, have negatively impacted the global economy, disrupted global supply chains, created significant volatility and disruption of financial and commodity markets, and resulted in an unprecedented decline in demand for oil and natural gas, which has materially adversely affected our business, financial position, results of operations, and cash flows and exacerbated the potential negative impact from many of the other risks described herein, including those relating to our financial position and debt obligations. Also, for example, the pandemic has increased volatility and caused negative pressure in the capital markets; as a result, we may experience difficulty accessing the capital or financing needed to fund our operations, which have substantial capital requirements, on satisfactory terms or at all, compounding liquidity risks associated with a material reduction in our revenues and cash flows as a result of the decline in demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We expect the COVID-19 pandemic and related economic repercussions to continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. However, the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, is uncertain and depends on various factors that we cannot predict, including the following: the severity and duration of the pandemic; governmental, business and other actions in response to the pandemic; the impact of the pandemic on economic activity; the response of the overall economy and the financial markets; the demand for oil and natural gas, which may be reduced on a prolonged or permanent basis due to a structural shift in the global economy in the way people work, travel, and interact, or in connection with a global recession or depression; any impairment in the value of our tangible or intangible assets which could be recorded as a result of a weaker economic conditions or commodity prices; and the potential effects on our internal controls, including those over financial reporting, as a result of changes in working environments, such as shelter-in-place and similar orders that are applicable to our employees and business partners, among others. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect the COVID-19 pandemic may have, and as a result, the ultimate impact of the pandemic is highly uncertain and subject to change.
Our operations are subject to operating hazards inherent to our industry that may adversely impact our ability to conduct business, and we may not be fully insured against all such operating risks. The operating hazards in exploring for and producing oil and natural gas include: encountering unexpected subsurface conditions that cause damage to equipment or personal injury,
including loss of life; equipment failures that curtail or stop production or cause severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources or other equipment; blowouts or other damages to the productive formations of our reserves that require a well to be re-drilled or other corrective action to be taken; and storms and other extreme weather conditions that cause damages to our production facilities or wells. Because of these or other events, we could experience environmental hazards, including release of oil and natural gas from spills, natural gas leaks, accidental leakage of toxic or hazardous materials, such as petroleum liquids, drilling fluids or fracturing fluids, including chemical additives, underground migration, and ruptures. If we experience any of these problems, we could incur substantial losses in excess of our insurance coverage.
The occurrence of a significant event or claim, not fully insured or indemnified against, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations. In accordance with industry practice, we maintain insurance against some, but not all, of the operating risks to which our business is exposed. Also, no assurance can be given that we will be able to maintain insurance in the future at rates we consider reasonable to cover our possible losses from operating hazards and we may elect no or minimal insurance coverage.
Our exploration and development drilling efforts and the operation of our wells may not be profitable or achieve our targeted returns. Exploration, development, drilling and production activities are subject to many risks. We may invest in property, including undeveloped leasehold acreage, which we believe will result in projects that will add value over time. However, we cannot guarantee that any leasehold acreage acquired will be profitably developed, that new wells drilled will be productive or that we will recover all or any portion of our investment in such leasehold acreage or wells. Drilling for oil and natural gas may involve unprofitable efforts, including wells that are productive but do not produce sufficient net reserves to return a profit after deducting operating and other costs. In addition, we may not be successful in controlling our drilling and production costs to improve our overall return and wells that are profitable may not achieve our targeted rate of return. Wells may have production decline rates that are greater than anticipated. Future drilling and completion efforts may impact production from existing wells, and parent-child effects may impact future well productivity as a result of timing, spacing proximity or other factors. Failure to conduct our oil and gas operations in a profitable manner may result in write- downs of our proved reserves quantities, impairment of our oil and gas properties, and a write-down in the carrying value of our unproved properties, and over time may adversely affect our growth, revenues and cash flows.
Multi-well pad drilling may result in volatility in our operating results. We utilize multi-well pad drilling where practical. Because wells drilled on a pad are not brought into production until all wells on the pad are drilled and completed and the drilling rig is moved from the location, multi-well pad drilling delays the commencement of production. In addition, problems affecting a single well could adversely affect production from all of the wells on the pad, which would further cause delays in the scheduled commencement of production or interruptions in ongoing production. These delays or interruptions may cause volatility in our operating results. Further, any delay, reduction or curtailment of our development and producing operations due to operational delays caused by multi-well pad drilling could result in the loss of acreage through lease expirations.
Restrictions on our ability to obtain, recycle and dispose of water may impact our ability to execute our drilling and development plans in a timely or cost-effective manner. Water is an essential component of both the drilling and hydraulic fracturing processes. Historically, we have been able to secure water from local land owners and other third party sources for use in our operations. If drought conditions were to occur or demand for water were to outpace supply, our ability to obtain water could be impacted and in turn, our ability to perform hydraulic fracturing operations could be restricted or made more costly. Along with the risks of other extreme weather events, drought risk, in particular, is likely increased by climate change. If we are unable to obtain water to use in our operations from local sources, we may be unable to economically produce oil and natural gas, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, significant amounts of water are produced in our operations. Inadequate access to or availability of water recycling or water disposal facilities could adversely affect our production volumes or significantly increase the cost of our operations.
Risks Related to Marketing and Transportation
Factors beyond our control, including the availability and capacity of gas processing facilities and pipelines and other transportation operations owned and operated by third parties, affect the marketability of our production. The ability to market oil and natural gas from our wells depends upon numerous factors beyond our control. A significant factor in our ability to market our production is the availability and capacity of gas processing facilities and pipeline and other transportation operations, including trucking services, owned and operated by third parties. These facilities and services may be temporarily unavailable to us due to market conditions, physical or mechanical disruption, weather, lack of contracted capacity, pipeline safety issues, or other reasons. In addition, in certain newer development areas, processing and transportation facilities and services may not be sufficient to accommodate potential production and it may be necessary for new interstate and intrastate pipelines and gathering systems to be built. Our failure to obtain access to processing and transportation facilities and services on acceptable terms could materially harm our business. We may be required to shut in wells for lack of a market or because of inadequate or unavailable processing or transportation capacity. If that were to occur, we would be unable to realize revenue from those wells until transportation arrangements were made to deliver our production to market. Furthermore, if we were required to shut in wells, we might also be obligated to pay shut-in royalties to certain mineral interest owners in order to maintain our leases. If we were required to shut in our production for long periods of time due to lack of transportation capacity, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Other factors that affect our ability to market our production include:
•the extent of domestic production and imports/exports of oil and natural gas;
•federal regulations authorizing exports of LNG, the development of new LNG export facilities under construction in the U.S. Gulf Coast region, and the first LNG exports from such facilities;
•the construction of new pipelines capable of exporting U.S. natural gas to Mexico and transporting Eagle Ford and Permian oil production to the Gulf Coast;
•the proximity of hydrocarbon production to pipelines;
•the demand for oil and natural gas by utilities and other end users;
•the availability of alternative fuel sources;
•the effects of inclement weather; and
•state and federal regulation of oil, natural gas and NGL marketing and transportation.
We have entered into firm transportation contracts that require us to pay fixed sums of money regardless of quantities actually shipped. If we are unable to deliver the minimum quantities of production, such requirements could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. We have entered into firm transportation agreements for a portion of our production in certain areas in order to improve our ability, and that of our purchasers, to successfully market our production. We may also enter into firm transportation arrangements for additional production in the future. These firm transportation agreements may be more costly than interruptible or short-term transportation agreements. Additionally, these agreements obligate us to pay fees on minimum volumes regardless of actual throughput. If we have insufficient production to meet the minimum volumes, the requirements to pay for quantities not delivered could have an impact on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Reserves and Drilling Locations
Our estimated reserves are based on interpretations and assumptions that may be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve estimates or underlying assumptions will materially affect the quantities and present value of our reserves. This Annual Report contains estimates of our proved oil and natural gas reserves and the estimated future net cash flows from such reserves. The process of estimating oil and natural gas reserves is complex and requires significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each reservoir and is therefore inherently imprecise. These assumptions include those required by the SEC relating to oil and natural gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds.
Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil and natural gas reserves most likely will vary from the estimates. Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities and present value of reserves shown in this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, estimates of reserves and future cash flows may be subject to material downward or upward revisions, based on production history, development drilling and exploration activities and prices of oil and natural gas.
You should not assume that any PV-10 of our estimated proved reserves contained in this 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K represents the market value of our oil and natural gas reserves. We base the PV-10 from our estimated proved reserves at December 31, 2020 on the 12-Month Average Realized Price and costs as of the date of the estimate. Actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower. Further, actual future net revenues will be affected by factors such as the amount and timing of actual development expenditures, the rate and timing of production, and changes in governmental regulations or taxes. Recovery of PUDs generally requires significant capital expenditures and successful drilling operations. Our reserve estimates include the assumption that we will make significant capital expenditures to develop these PUDs and the actual costs, development schedule, and results associated with these properties may not be as estimated. In addition, the discount factor used to calculate PV-10 may not be appropriate based on our cost of capital from time to time and the risks associated with our business and the oil and gas industry.
Unless we replace our oil and gas reserves, our reserves and production will decline. Our future oil and gas production depends on our success in finding or acquiring additional reserves. If we fail to replace reserves through drilling or acquisitions, our production, revenues, reserve quantities and cash flows will decline. In general, production from oil and gas properties declines as reserves are depleted, with the rate of decline depending on reservoir characteristics. We may not be successful in finding, developing or acquiring additional reserves, and our efforts may not be economic. Our ability to make the necessary capital investment to maintain or expand our asset base of oil and gas reserves would be limited to the extent cash flow from operations is reduced and external sources of capital become limited or unavailable.
Our identified drilling locations are scheduled to be drilled over many years, making them susceptible to uncertainties that could prevent them from being drilled or delay their drilling. Our management team has identified drilling locations as an estimation of our future development activities on our existing acreage. These identified drilling locations represent a significant part of our growth strategy. Our ability to drill and develop these identified drilling locations depends on a number of uncertainties, including oil and natural gas prices, the availability and cost of capital, availability and cost of drilling, completion and production services and equipment, lease expirations, regulatory approvals, and other factors discussed in these risk factors. Because of these uncertain factors, we do not know if the identified drilling locations will ever be drilled or if we will be able to produce oil or natural gas from these drilling locations. In addition, unless production is established within the spacing units covering the undeveloped acres
on which some of the identified locations are located, the leases for such acreage will expire. Therefore, our actual drilling activities may materially differ from those presently identified.
The development of our PUDs may take longer and may require higher levels of capital expenditures than we currently anticipate. Developing PUDs requires significant capital expenditures and successful drilling operations, and a substantial amount of our proved reserves are PUDs which may not be ultimately developed or produced. Approximately 55% of our total estimated proved reserves as of December 31, 2020 were PUDs. The reserve data included in the reserve reports of our independent petroleum engineers assume significant capital expenditures will be made to develop such reserves. We cannot be certain that the estimated capital expenditures to develop these reserves are accurate, that development will occur as scheduled, or that the results of such development will be as estimated. We may be forced to limit, delay or cancel drilling operations as a result of a variety of factors, including: unexpected drilling conditions; pressure or irregularities in formations; lack of proximity to and shortage of capacity of transportation facilities; equipment failures or accidents and shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs, equipment, personnel and services; the availability of capital; and compliance with governmental requirements. Delays in the development of our reserves, increases in costs to drill and develop such reserves or decreases in commodity prices will reduce the future net revenues of our estimated PUDs and may result in some projects becoming uneconomical. In addition, delays in the development of reserves could force us to reclassify certain of our proved reserves as unproved reserves.
Risks Related to Technology
We may not be able to keep pace with technological developments in our industry. The oil and natural gas industry is characterized by rapid and significant technological advancements and introductions of new products and services using new technologies. As others use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage or may be forced by competitive pressures to implement those new technologies at substantial costs. We may not be able to respond to these competitive pressures or implement new technologies on a timely basis or at an acceptable cost. If one or more of the technologies we use now or in the future were to become obsolete, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our business could be negatively affected by security threats. A cyberattack or similar incident could occur and result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption, damage to our reputation or financial loss. The oil and natural gas industry has become increasingly dependent on digital technologies to conduct certain exploration, development, production, processing and financial activities. We depend on digital technology to estimate quantities of oil and gas reserves, manage operations, process and record financial and operating data, analyze seismic and drilling information, and communicate with our employees and third party partners. Our technologies, systems, networks, seismic data, reserves information or other proprietary information, and those of our vendors, suppliers and other business partners, may become the target of cyberattacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of proprietary and other information, or could otherwise lead to the disruption of our business operations or other operational disruptions in our exploration or production operations. Cyberattacks are becoming more sophisticated and certain cyber incidents, such as surveillance, may remain undetected for an extended period and could lead to disruptions in critical systems or the unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information. These events could lead to financial losses from remedial actions, loss of business, disruption of operations, damage to our reputation or potential liability. Also, computers control nearly all of the oil and gas distribution systems in the United States and abroad, which are necessary to transport our production to market. A cyberattack directed at oil and gas distribution systems could damage critical distribution and storage assets or the environment, delay or prevent delivery of production to markets and make it difficult or impossible to accurately account for production and settle transactions. Cyber incidents have increased, and the U.S. government has issued warnings indicating that energy assets may be specific targets of cybersecurity threats. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cybersecurity risks may not be sufficient. Further, as cyberattacks continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyberattacks.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financial Position
Our business requires significant capital expenditures and we may not be able to obtain needed capital or financing on satisfactory terms or at all. We make and expect to continue to make substantial capital expenditures in our business for the development, exploitation, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves. Historically, we have funded our capital expenditures through a combination of cash flows from operations, borrowings from financial institutions, the sale of public debt and equity securities and asset dispositions. The actual amount and timing of our future capital expenditures may differ materially from our estimates as a result of, among other things, commodity prices, actual drilling results, participation of non-operating working interest owners, the cost and availability of drilling rigs and other services and equipment, and regulatory, technological and competitive developments.
If the ability to borrow under our Credit Facility or our cash flows from operations decrease, we may have limited ability to obtain the capital necessary to sustain our operations at current levels. The failure to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, could result in a curtailment of our development activities and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our leverage and debt service obligations may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. As of December 31, 2020, we had aggregate outstanding indebtedness of approximately $3.0 billion. Our amount of indebtedness could affect our operations in many ways, including:
•requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our existing debt, thereby reducing the cash available to finance our operations and other business activities;
•limiting management’s discretion in operating our business and our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
•increasing our vulnerability to downturns and adverse developments in our business and the economy;
•limiting our ability to access the capital markets to raise capital on favorable terms, to borrow under our Credit Facility or to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures or acquisitions or to refinance existing indebtedness;
•making it more likely that a reduction in our borrowing base following a periodic redetermination could require us to repay a portion of our then-outstanding bank borrowings;
•making us vulnerable to increases in interest rates as our indebtedness under our Credit Facility may vary with prevailing interest rates;
•placing us at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors with lower levels of indebtedness or less restrictive terms governing their indebtedness; and
•making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our senior notes or other debt and increasing the risk that we may default on our debt obligations.
Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may limit our ability to respond to changes in market conditions or pursue business opportunities. Our Credit Facility and the indentures governing our senior notes contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness including secured indebtedness; make investments; merge or consolidate with another entity; pay dividends or make certain other payments; hedge future production or interest rates; create liens that secure indebtedness; repurchase securities; sell assets; or engage in certain other transactions without the prior consent of the holders or lenders. As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business and we may be unable to react to changes in market conditions, take advantage of business opportunities we believe to be desirable, obtain future financing, fund needed capital expenditures or withstand a continuing or future downturn in our business.
In addition, our Credit Facility requires us to maintain certain financial ratios and to make certain required payments of principal, premium, if any, and interest. If we fail to comply with these provisions or other financial and operating covenants in the Credit Facility or the indentures governing our senior notes, we could be in default under the terms of the agreements governing such indebtedness. In the event of such default, the holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare all the funds borrowed thereunder to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, the lenders under our Credit Facility could elect to terminate their commitments thereunder, cease making further loans and institute foreclosure proceedings against our assets; and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Adverse changes in our credit rating may affect our borrowing capacity and borrowing terms. Our outstanding debt is periodically rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry and the economic outlook. Our credit rating may affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financing we m