Investor Update September 2020Investor Update September 2020

Safe Harbor / Forward Looking Statements Certain statements made in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including but not limited to those statements related to CoreLogic, Inc.’s (“CoreLogic”, the “Company” or “us”) expected financial results, including in the second half of fiscal year 2020 and fiscal years 2021 and 2022; overall mortgage market volumes; market opportunities; stockholder value creation, repurchases of our shares, our strategic plans or growth strategy, and the near and long-term consequences of the unsolicited proposal we received from Senator Investment Group, LP (“Senator”) and Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae”) on June 26, 2020 (the “Unsolicited Proposal”). Risks and uncertainties exist that may cause the results to differ materially from those set forth in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the anticipated results to differ from those described in the forward-looking statements include the risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A of our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as such risk factors may be amended, supplemented, or superseded from time to time by other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to: any potential developments related to the Unsolicited Proposal; any impact resulting from COVID-19; our ability to protect our information systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches; limitations on our ability to repurchase our shares; changes in prices at which we are able to repurchase our shares; limitations on access to or increase in prices for data from external sources, including government and public record sources; systems interruptions that may impair the delivery of our products and services; changes in applicable government legislation, regulations and the level of regulatory scrutiny affecting our customers or us, including with respect to consumer financial services and the use of public records and consumer data; difficult conditions in the mortgage and consumer lending industries and the economy generally; risks related to the outsourcing of services and international operations; our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of certain acquisitions and/or divestitures and the timing thereof; impairments in our goodwill or other intangible assets; and our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. CoreLogic does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward- looking statements are made. Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures This presentation contains certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS and FCF (or free cash flow), which are provided only as supplemental information. Investors should consider these non-GAAP financial measures only in conjunction with their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. These non- GAAP measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures for historical periods to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is included at the end of this presentation. CoreLogic believes that its presentation of these non-GAAP measures provides useful supplemental information to investors and management regarding CoreLogic’s financial condition and results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income from continuing operations adjusted for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, non-operating gains/losses, and other adjustments. Adjusted EPS is defined as diluted income from continuing operations, net of tax per share, adjusted for share-based compensation, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, non-operating gains/losses, and other adjustments; and assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020. FCF (or free cash flow) is defined as net cash provided by continuing operating activities, less capital expenditures for purchases of property and equipment, capitalized data, and other intangible assets. Other firms may calculate non-GAAP measures differently than CoreLogic, which limits comparability between companies. Because the non-GAAP measures for future periods included herein are forward- looking, CoreLogic is not able to provide a reconciliation, without unreasonable efforts, of such forward-looking guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure due to the unknown effect, timing, and potential significance of special charges or gains that are material to the comparable GAAP financial measure. ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1Safe Harbor / Forward Looking Statements Certain statements made in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including but not limited to those statements related to CoreLogic, Inc.’s (“CoreLogic”, the “Company” or “us”) expected financial results, including in the second half of fiscal year 2020 and fiscal years 2021 and 2022; overall mortgage market volumes; market opportunities; stockholder value creation, repurchases of our shares, our strategic plans or growth strategy, and the near and long-term consequences of the unsolicited proposal we received from Senator Investment Group, LP (“Senator”) and Cannae Holdings, Inc. (“Cannae”) on June 26, 2020 (the “Unsolicited Proposal”). Risks and uncertainties exist that may cause the results to differ materially from those set forth in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the anticipated results to differ from those described in the forward-looking statements include the risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A of our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as such risk factors may be amended, supplemented, or superseded from time to time by other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to: any potential developments related to the Unsolicited Proposal; any impact resulting from COVID-19; our ability to protect our information systems against data corruption, cyber-based attacks or network security breaches; limitations on our ability to repurchase our shares; changes in prices at which we are able to repurchase our shares; limitations on access to or increase in prices for data from external sources, including government and public record sources; systems interruptions that may impair the delivery of our products and services; changes in applicable government legislation, regulations and the level of regulatory scrutiny affecting our customers or us, including with respect to consumer financial services and the use of public records and consumer data; difficult conditions in the mortgage and consumer lending industries and the economy generally; risks related to the outsourcing of services and international operations; our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of certain acquisitions and/or divestitures and the timing thereof; impairments in our goodwill or other intangible assets; and our ability to generate sufficient cash to service our debt. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. CoreLogic does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward- looking statements are made. Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures This presentation contains certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EPS and FCF (or free cash flow), which are provided only as supplemental information. Investors should consider these non-GAAP financial measures only in conjunction with their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. These non- GAAP measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, U.S. GAAP. A reconciliation of non-GAAP measures for historical periods to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is included at the end of this presentation. CoreLogic believes that its presentation of these non-GAAP measures provides useful supplemental information to investors and management regarding CoreLogic’s financial condition and results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income from continuing operations adjusted for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, non-operating gains/losses, and other adjustments. Adjusted EPS is defined as diluted income from continuing operations, net of tax per share, adjusted for share-based compensation, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, non-operating gains/losses, and other adjustments; and assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020. FCF (or free cash flow) is defined as net cash provided by continuing operating activities, less capital expenditures for purchases of property and equipment, capitalized data, and other intangible assets. Other firms may calculate non-GAAP measures differently than CoreLogic, which limits comparability between companies. Because the non-GAAP measures for future periods included herein are forward- looking, CoreLogic is not able to provide a reconciliation, without unreasonable efforts, of such forward-looking guidance to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure due to the unknown effect, timing, and potential significance of special charges or gains that are material to the comparable GAAP financial measure. ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1

Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Is Not in Shareholders’ Best Interests CoreLogic is a leading information services company delivering its strongest year ever in 2020, with line-of-sight to continued growth and profitability which should merit further valuation enhancements (1) (2) (1) § In 2020, our best year ever, we expect to deliver revenue growth of 14% , adjusted EBITDA growth of 25% and ~300bps of (2) (1) adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to 32% § In 2021, 2022 and beyond we expect ~5% organic growth, further margin expansion and continued shift in business mix beyond mortgage-dependent revenue § As additional quarters bear out the durability of our transformation, we expect the market will rerate our multiple to become more in line with the multiples of other leading information services providers Our Board believes Senator/Cannae’s proposal, by ignoring CoreLogic’s transformation, demonstrably robust earnings power, increased 2020 guidance and strong multi-year outlook, significantly undervalues CoreLogic (2) § Simply applying Senator/Cannae’s initial proposed 13.4x multiple to our increased 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance implies a value in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator / Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price based on our current FY 2020 guidance results in a price in the ~$67 - ~$69 range — without giving effect to any takeover premium, our increased long-term growth and margins or our significant share repurchase commitment § Accounting for our strong growth prospects, which are not reliant on mortgage cyclicality (~95% recurring revenue), should merit further valuation enhancements (3) § Research analysts have noted our potential for near-term multiple expansion – the lowest multiple among peers is 15.8x , and recent deals in the sector further justify a higher multiple CoreLogic’s Board is highly qualified to evaluate all strategic alternatives, including this proposal Unlike CoreLogic’s Board – which is committed to delivering value to shareholders by considering all viable pathways – it is our view that Senator/Cannae’s nominees, who were hand-picked by the group attempting to buy CoreLogic for the lowest possible price, lack the experience to evaluate all strategic alternatives PROTECT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT – A VOTE AGAINST REMOVAL OF THE CORELOGIC DIRECTORS IS IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS 1. 2020 forecast based on midpoint of guidance ranges; forecasts exclude impact of planned divestitures of existing businesses; 2019 adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non-core units), which have no 2020 counterpart 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. FactSet as of 9/18/20; based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Is Not in Shareholders’ Best Interests CoreLogic is a leading information services company delivering its strongest year ever in 2020, with line-of-sight to continued growth and profitability which should merit further valuation enhancements (1) (2) (1) § In 2020, our best year ever, we expect to deliver revenue growth of 14% , adjusted EBITDA growth of 25% and ~300bps of (2) (1) adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to 32% § In 2021, 2022 and beyond we expect ~5% organic growth, further margin expansion and continued shift in business mix beyond mortgage-dependent revenue § As additional quarters bear out the durability of our transformation, we expect the market will rerate our multiple to become more in line with the multiples of other leading information services providers Our Board believes Senator/Cannae’s proposal, by ignoring CoreLogic’s transformation, demonstrably robust earnings power, increased 2020 guidance and strong multi-year outlook, significantly undervalues CoreLogic (2) § Simply applying Senator/Cannae’s initial proposed 13.4x multiple to our increased 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance implies a value in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator / Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price based on our current FY 2020 guidance results in a price in the ~$67 - ~$69 range — without giving effect to any takeover premium, our increased long-term growth and margins or our significant share repurchase commitment § Accounting for our strong growth prospects, which are not reliant on mortgage cyclicality (~95% recurring revenue), should merit further valuation enhancements (3) § Research analysts have noted our potential for near-term multiple expansion – the lowest multiple among peers is 15.8x , and recent deals in the sector further justify a higher multiple CoreLogic’s Board is highly qualified to evaluate all strategic alternatives, including this proposal Unlike CoreLogic’s Board – which is committed to delivering value to shareholders by considering all viable pathways – it is our view that Senator/Cannae’s nominees, who were hand-picked by the group attempting to buy CoreLogic for the lowest possible price, lack the experience to evaluate all strategic alternatives PROTECT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT – A VOTE AGAINST REMOVAL OF THE CORELOGIC DIRECTORS IS IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS 1. 2020 forecast based on midpoint of guidance ranges; forecasts exclude impact of planned divestitures of existing businesses; 2019 adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non-core units), which have no 2020 counterpart 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. FactSet as of 9/18/20; based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2

CoreLogic – Delivering Near-Term and Long-Term Value Creation Increasing Non-Mortgage Revenue Mix Stable (1) ~50% (1) ~45% ~95% Revenue Base ~40% Recurring Single ~35% with Reduced Revenue Digits Cyclicality 2011 2018 Today FY 2021PF FY 2022PF Consistent Track Record of Growth Visibility Into Continued Growth (2) 6% Revenue CAGR § New Business Wins Mid to High- Sustainable (3) (2) § Share Gains Single Digit 11% Adjusted EBITDA CAGR Growth Revenue § New Products (4) (2) 22% Adjusted EPS CAGR Growth and Solutions FY 2011 – FY 2020E (1) ~35% Additional ~40bps ~22% Expanding annual margin Margins expansion expected 2011 FY 2020PF $2bn+ $1bn 50% 55-65% Strong of capital repurchase plan dividend free cash flow Capital returned from announced in increase in conversion over 2011 through the Q2 2020 Q2 2020 the last five years Return (5) end of 2020 1. Pro forma for the planned divestitures; for illustrative purposes only 2. From FY 2011 – FY 2020E; based on midpoint of FY 2020 Guidance; does not reflect impact of announced divestitures or $1bn share repurchase program 3. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 4. For the definition of adjusted EPS, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1; assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020 5. Includes $500mm planned share repurchases during 2H 2020 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3CoreLogic – Delivering Near-Term and Long-Term Value Creation Increasing Non-Mortgage Revenue Mix Stable (1) ~50% (1) ~45% ~95% Revenue Base ~40% Recurring Single ~35% with Reduced Revenue Digits Cyclicality 2011 2018 Today FY 2021PF FY 2022PF Consistent Track Record of Growth Visibility Into Continued Growth (2) 6% Revenue CAGR § New Business Wins Mid to High- Sustainable (3) (2) § Share Gains Single Digit 11% Adjusted EBITDA CAGR Growth Revenue § New Products (4) (2) 22% Adjusted EPS CAGR Growth and Solutions FY 2011 – FY 2020E (1) ~35% Additional ~40bps ~22% Expanding annual margin Margins expansion expected 2011 FY 2020PF $2bn+ $1bn 50% 55-65% Strong of capital repurchase plan dividend free cash flow Capital returned from announced in increase in conversion over 2011 through the Q2 2020 Q2 2020 the last five years Return (5) end of 2020 1. Pro forma for the planned divestitures; for illustrative purposes only 2. From FY 2011 – FY 2020E; based on midpoint of FY 2020 Guidance; does not reflect impact of announced divestitures or $1bn share repurchase program 3. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 4. For the definition of adjusted EPS, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1; assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020 5. Includes $500mm planned share repurchases during 2H 2020 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3

Any Way You Look At It, $66 Undervalues CoreLogic (1) Metric Multiple Implication No Premium $615 - $630 ~11.3x to Historical ~$67 - ~$69 Trading Multiple 2020 adjusted Pre-Offer 2020 adjusted (2) (2) (3) EBITDA Guidance EBITDA Multiple Initial Proposal Value ~13.4x $615 - $630 Multiple Implied 2020 Re-Rating ~$83 - ~$85 Implies Much (2) adjusted EBITDA 2020 adjusted Opportunity (4) Higher Price (2) Multiple of EBITDA Guidance hostile proposal Ignores Value Significant Upside $615 - $630 ~15.8x Re-Rating ~$101 - ~$104 From Multiple Opportunity Lowest Info Expansion 2020 adjusted (5) (2) Services Multiple EBITDA Guidance Senator / Cannae's proposal does not factor in our sustainable financial profile improvement and the anticipated resulting valuation multiple re-rating over time Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings 1. For illustrative purposes 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. Trading multiple based on midpoint of 2020 guidance at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 4. Multiple implied by Senator / Cannae’s initial $65/share proposal and 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 5. Peer group consists of CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk and Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer; see page 22 for additional details ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4Any Way You Look At It, $66 Undervalues CoreLogic (1) Metric Multiple Implication No Premium $615 - $630 ~11.3x to Historical ~$67 - ~$69 Trading Multiple 2020 adjusted Pre-Offer 2020 adjusted (2) (2) (3) EBITDA Guidance EBITDA Multiple Initial Proposal Value ~13.4x $615 - $630 Multiple Implied 2020 Re-Rating ~$83 - ~$85 Implies Much (2) adjusted EBITDA 2020 adjusted Opportunity (4) Higher Price (2) Multiple of EBITDA Guidance hostile proposal Ignores Value Significant Upside $615 - $630 ~15.8x Re-Rating ~$101 - ~$104 From Multiple Opportunity Lowest Info Expansion 2020 adjusted (5) (2) Services Multiple EBITDA Guidance Senator / Cannae's proposal does not factor in our sustainable financial profile improvement and the anticipated resulting valuation multiple re-rating over time Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings 1. For illustrative purposes 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. Trading multiple based on midpoint of 2020 guidance at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 4. Multiple implied by Senator / Cannae’s initial $65/share proposal and 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 5. Peer group consists of CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk and Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer; see page 22 for additional details ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4

Discussion Topics for Today’s Meeting CoreLogic – The Information Currency for the 1 Residential Property Ecosystem We Believe CoreLogic is Well-Positioned to Further Generate 2 Significant Shareholder Value Upside Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Materially 3 Undervalues CoreLogic and Raises Serious Regulatory Concerns We Have Assembled A Fit-For-Purpose Board To Oversee 4 Our Continued Execution and Evaluate All Pathways to Value ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5Discussion Topics for Today’s Meeting CoreLogic – The Information Currency for the 1 Residential Property Ecosystem We Believe CoreLogic is Well-Positioned to Further Generate 2 Significant Shareholder Value Upside Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Materially 3 Undervalues CoreLogic and Raises Serious Regulatory Concerns We Have Assembled A Fit-For-Purpose Board To Oversee 4 Our Continued Execution and Evaluate All Pathways to Value ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5

CoreLogic – The Information Currency for the Residential Property EcosystemCoreLogic – The Information Currency for the Residential Property Ecosystem

CoreLogic Today Global Leader in Residential Property Data, Analytics and Data-Enabled Services 2020 By the Numbers 7 of 10 $1.93 ~5,000 9 Irvine, CA U.S. Mortgages $623m billion Underwritten Employees Countries Headquarters Adjusted EBITDA Revenue (1) (2) Using CoreLogic (1) Guidance Guidance Business Overview Market Leader Property Insights§ Solutions to find the right propertyP Property Intelligence & § Solutions to help protect property Risk Management Insurance & SpatialP § Weather and climate modelling § Provides property tax monitoring, reporting and Property Tax SolutionsP outsourcing Credit Solutions§ Mortgage and auto credit solutionsP Underwriting & Workflow Solutions Valuation Solutions§ Platform and appraisal management servicesP § Leading supplier of flood data and compliance Flood ServicesP services 1. Based on midpoint of FY 2020 guidance; excludes the impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6CoreLogic Today Global Leader in Residential Property Data, Analytics and Data-Enabled Services 2020 By the Numbers 7 of 10 $1.93 ~5,000 9 Irvine, CA U.S. Mortgages $623m billion Underwritten Employees Countries Headquarters Adjusted EBITDA Revenue (1) (2) Using CoreLogic (1) Guidance Guidance Business Overview Market Leader Property Insights§ Solutions to find the right propertyP Property Intelligence & § Solutions to help protect property Risk Management Insurance & SpatialP § Weather and climate modelling § Provides property tax monitoring, reporting and Property Tax SolutionsP outsourcing Credit Solutions§ Mortgage and auto credit solutionsP Underwriting & Workflow Solutions Valuation Solutions§ Platform and appraisal management servicesP § Leading supplier of flood data and compliance Flood ServicesP services 1. Based on midpoint of FY 2020 guidance; excludes the impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6

CoreLogic Is a Story of Successful Transformation… Establish an Independent, Extend Market Leadership, Invest for Scalable Market Leader Growth While Driving Margin Expansion 2010 – 2015 2016 – 2019 § Spin-off of First American Financial§ Built out leading collateral valuations platform § Launched transition of tech stack to Google § Integrated data repositories and private cloud Cloud Platform tech stack § Expanded non-mortgage business from ~30% to ~40% § Executed significant divestitures and portfolio rationalization (30+% of revenue) § Bolstered go-to-market organization § Exited additional legacy non-core units (~$100 million revenue) § Implemented significant cost optimization programs (~$150 million annualized) § Reduced costs by $25+ million/year, achieving (1) (1) ~13% operating margin and ~30% (2) adjusted EBITDA margin ahead of plan § Repurchased 35 million shares § Repurchased 14 million shares and initiated dividend program 1. As of Q4 2019 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7CoreLogic Is a Story of Successful Transformation… Establish an Independent, Extend Market Leadership, Invest for Scalable Market Leader Growth While Driving Margin Expansion 2010 – 2015 2016 – 2019 § Spin-off of First American Financial§ Built out leading collateral valuations platform § Launched transition of tech stack to Google § Integrated data repositories and private cloud Cloud Platform tech stack § Expanded non-mortgage business from ~30% to ~40% § Executed significant divestitures and portfolio rationalization (30+% of revenue) § Bolstered go-to-market organization § Exited additional legacy non-core units (~$100 million revenue) § Implemented significant cost optimization programs (~$150 million annualized) § Reduced costs by $25+ million/year, achieving (1) (1) ~13% operating margin and ~30% (2) adjusted EBITDA margin ahead of plan § Repurchased 35 million shares § Repurchased 14 million shares and initiated dividend program 1. As of Q4 2019 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7

…and the Company Is at a Compelling Inflection Point “Step on the Gas” (Accelerate Growth and Margin Expansion) 2020… …and Beyond § Record financial results – YTD and projected We expect: full year § Sustainable mid to high single-digit growth on heels of “mega” wins and product (1) § 1H margins above 30% with 65+% FCF innovations to help Find, Buy & Protect conversion homes (2) § Integrated cloud-based technology and § “Mega” wins in PIRM and UWS support digital data platform will support organic and sustainable accelerating growth inorganic growth at scale § Further diversification toward non-mortgage § Macro tailwinds in massive addressable revenue mortgage and non-mortgage market § Significant platform investments in “rear- view” resulting in additional operating leverage (35+% long-term margin target) 1. For the definition of free cash flow, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. We define “mega” wins as contracts in excess of one year in duration and greater than $10 million in total revenue ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8…and the Company Is at a Compelling Inflection Point “Step on the Gas” (Accelerate Growth and Margin Expansion) 2020… …and Beyond § Record financial results – YTD and projected We expect: full year § Sustainable mid to high single-digit growth on heels of “mega” wins and product (1) § 1H margins above 30% with 65+% FCF innovations to help Find, Buy & Protect conversion homes (2) § Integrated cloud-based technology and § “Mega” wins in PIRM and UWS support digital data platform will support organic and sustainable accelerating growth inorganic growth at scale § Further diversification toward non-mortgage § Macro tailwinds in massive addressable revenue mortgage and non-mortgage market § Significant platform investments in “rear- view” resulting in additional operating leverage (35+% long-term margin target) 1. For the definition of free cash flow, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. We define “mega” wins as contracts in excess of one year in duration and greater than $10 million in total revenue ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8

Diversification Strategy To Accelerate Growth Next Phase of Strategic Transformation to Drive Value Creation Strong Progress on Building Out Our Non- …Positions CoreLogic to Target Large New Mortgage Footprint… Addressable Markets Non-Mortgage Revenue Mix ~50% ~45% ~40% ~35% (1) (1) 2018 Today 2021PF 2022PF Mortgage ~$40B Recent TAM-Expanding Investments Commercial Property Real Estate Tech P&C Insurance ü Insurance and International Workflow Tax Processing Authentication Solutions Claims Platform revenue expected to achieve high- single-digit organic growth in 2H 2020 and beyond Geospatial Data & UK based Valuation Real Estate Analytics Workflow Platform Marketing Solutions Solutions Source: Company filings Note: Mortgage TAM represents U.S. mortgage TAM; Non-Mortgage TAM represents U.S. non-mortgage and international mortgage TAM 1. Pro forma for the planned divestitures as if consummated on 12/31/20 for illustrative purposes only ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9Diversification Strategy To Accelerate Growth Next Phase of Strategic Transformation to Drive Value Creation Strong Progress on Building Out Our Non- …Positions CoreLogic to Target Large New Mortgage Footprint… Addressable Markets Non-Mortgage Revenue Mix ~50% ~45% ~40% ~35% (1) (1) 2018 Today 2021PF 2022PF Mortgage ~$40B Recent TAM-Expanding Investments Commercial Property Real Estate Tech P&C Insurance ü Insurance and International Workflow Tax Processing Authentication Solutions Claims Platform revenue expected to achieve high- single-digit organic growth in 2H 2020 and beyond Geospatial Data & UK based Valuation Real Estate Analytics Workflow Platform Marketing Solutions Solutions Source: Company filings Note: Mortgage TAM represents U.S. mortgage TAM; Non-Mortgage TAM represents U.S. non-mortgage and international mortgage TAM 1. Pro forma for the planned divestitures as if consummated on 12/31/20 for illustrative purposes only ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9

We Believe CoreLogic Is Well-Positioned to Further Generate Significant Shareholder Value UpsideWe Believe CoreLogic Is Well-Positioned to Further Generate Significant Shareholder Value Upside

CoreLogic Has A Track Record of Operational Excellence and Delivering Results Operating Performance (2) Since Issuing Adjusted EBITDA Guidance, Enhancements CoreLogic Has Met or Beat in Every Quarter (1) FY 2011 – FY 2020E Quarter Met / Beat Revenue Q2 P 6% CAGR Q1 P Q4 P (2) Q3 P Adjusted EBITDA 11% CAGR Q2 P Q1 P Q4 P (3) Adjusted EPS Q3 P 22% CAGR Q2 P Q1 P (2) Adjusted EBITDA Margin Q4 P ~990bps Q3 P 1. Based on midpoint of FY 2020 guidance; does not reflect impact of announced divestitures or $1 billion share repurchase program 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. For the definition of adjusted EPS see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1; assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 2017 2018 2019 2020CoreLogic Has A Track Record of Operational Excellence and Delivering Results Operating Performance (2) Since Issuing Adjusted EBITDA Guidance, Enhancements CoreLogic Has Met or Beat in Every Quarter (1) FY 2011 – FY 2020E Quarter Met / Beat Revenue Q2 P 6% CAGR Q1 P Q4 P (2) Q3 P Adjusted EBITDA 11% CAGR Q2 P Q1 P Q4 P (3) Adjusted EPS Q3 P 22% CAGR Q2 P Q1 P (2) Adjusted EBITDA Margin Q4 P ~990bps Q3 P 1. Based on midpoint of FY 2020 guidance; does not reflect impact of announced divestitures or $1 billion share repurchase program 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. For the definition of adjusted EPS see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1; assumes an effective tax rate of 26% for 2020 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 2017 2018 2019 2020

2020 Record Results Validate Transformation and Investments ($ in millions) FY 2020E YoY Growth (%) Revenue $1,920 - $1,945 14% (1) Adjusted EBITDA $615 - $630 25% (1) Adjusted EBITDA ~32% ~300bps Margin (2) Share Repurchases ~$500 477% We raised our FY 2020 guidance three times based on accelerating momentum and significant business visibility Note: 2020 figures exclude the impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses; growth rates based on midpoint of guidance Note: 2019 revenue and margin figures Include a ~$70 million revenue adjustment attributable to the completion of the previously announced AMC transformation program and exit of non-core default technology operations, which have no 2020 counterpart 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 2. Based on the Company’s announced intention ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 112020 Record Results Validate Transformation and Investments ($ in millions) FY 2020E YoY Growth (%) Revenue $1,920 - $1,945 14% (1) Adjusted EBITDA $615 - $630 25% (1) Adjusted EBITDA ~32% ~300bps Margin (2) Share Repurchases ~$500 477% We raised our FY 2020 guidance three times based on accelerating momentum and significant business visibility Note: 2020 figures exclude the impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses; growth rates based on midpoint of guidance Note: 2019 revenue and margin figures Include a ~$70 million revenue adjustment attributable to the completion of the previously announced AMC transformation program and exit of non-core default technology operations, which have no 2020 counterpart 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 2. Based on the Company’s announced intention ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11

Our Forecast for 2021 and Beyond is Even More Compelling ($ in millions) FY 2021 Longer-Term Demonstrable 1 accelerating growth Target Mid to Upper $1,965-2,010 Revenue Single Digit Growth Clear line-of-sight to 2 deliver 2021 forecast Target 3 Adjusted Current macro backdrop $635-660 ~35%+ (1) EBITDA expected to provide a 32-33% Margin Target Target Adjusted significant tailwind to our (1) EBITDA Margin mortgage business • Organic growth of at least 5% Highly recurring and high 4 Key • COVID recovery quality revenue Assumptions • Mortgage originations -10-15% Note: Forecasts exclude impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12Our Forecast for 2021 and Beyond is Even More Compelling ($ in millions) FY 2021 Longer-Term Demonstrable 1 accelerating growth Target Mid to Upper $1,965-2,010 Revenue Single Digit Growth Clear line-of-sight to 2 deliver 2021 forecast Target 3 Adjusted Current macro backdrop $635-660 ~35%+ (1) EBITDA expected to provide a 32-33% Margin Target Target Adjusted significant tailwind to our (1) EBITDA Margin mortgage business • Organic growth of at least 5% Highly recurring and high 4 Key • COVID recovery quality revenue Assumptions • Mortgage originations -10-15% Note: Forecasts exclude impact of potential divestitures of existing businesses 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12

1 Demonstrably Accelerating Growth (1) YoY Revenue Growth ü Trending towards 5% organic growth in 2020, consistent 15% with forecasted growth rates in 2021 and 2022 14% 12% ü Significant broad-based market share gains secured across mortgage and non- mortgage ü Expanded client solutions and new product revenue growth in core mortgage, and real estate verticals (2) ü Strategic “Mega” wins in Insurance & Spatial and Mortgage 4Q 19 1Q 20 2Q 20 1. Total growth rates are pro forma for previously announced AMC transformation program, exit of non-core default technology operations, and impact of COVID-19 2. We define “Mega” wins as contracts in excess of one year in duration and greater than $10 million in total revenue ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 131 Demonstrably Accelerating Growth (1) YoY Revenue Growth ü Trending towards 5% organic growth in 2020, consistent 15% with forecasted growth rates in 2021 and 2022 14% 12% ü Significant broad-based market share gains secured across mortgage and non- mortgage ü Expanded client solutions and new product revenue growth in core mortgage, and real estate verticals (2) ü Strategic “Mega” wins in Insurance & Spatial and Mortgage 4Q 19 1Q 20 2Q 20 1. Total growth rates are pro forma for previously announced AMC transformation program, exit of non-core default technology operations, and impact of COVID-19 2. We define “Mega” wins as contracts in excess of one year in duration and greater than $10 million in total revenue ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13

2 Clear Line-of-Sight to Deliver 2021 Forecast Despite Expected Mortgage Contraction ($ in millions) ~3% ~5% / Overall Organic Growth Growth $95 - $100 $1,965 - $2,010 $30 - $35 $1,920 - $1,945 ($80) - ($70) Majority of expected COVID Over 60% of impact not 2021 growth 10-15% directly tied to target secured by contraction in 2020 YTD U.S. mortgage U.S. mortgage contract wins volume market expected in 2021 2020 Revenue Expected U.S. Mortgage Organic 2021 Revenue Guidance COVID Recovery Market Growth Guidance ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 142 Clear Line-of-Sight to Deliver 2021 Forecast Despite Expected Mortgage Contraction ($ in millions) ~3% ~5% / Overall Organic Growth Growth $95 - $100 $1,965 - $2,010 $30 - $35 $1,920 - $1,945 ($80) - ($70) Majority of expected COVID Over 60% of impact not 2021 growth 10-15% directly tied to target secured by contraction in 2020 YTD U.S. mortgage U.S. mortgage contract wins volume market expected in 2021 2020 Revenue Expected U.S. Mortgage Organic 2021 Revenue Guidance COVID Recovery Market Growth Guidance ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14

3 Current Macro Backdrop Expected to Provide a Significant Tailwind to Our Mortgage Business Mortgage Rates Are at Historic Lows... ...Which has Fueled Record Mortgage Activity... 30-yr Fixed-Rate Mortgage Monthly Closed Title Orders (thousands) 6% 120 4% 80 99 4.0% 67 2.9% 2% 40 0% 0 Dec-17 Jun-18 Jan-19 Jul-19 Feb-20 Sep-20 Dec-17 Jun-18 Nov-18 Apr-19 Sep-19 Feb-20 Jul-20 ...and There is a Historically High Backlog of Mortgage Refinancing Candidates That Should Provide Years of Demand “While the housing market undoubtedly has felt the effects of Refinance Candidates (millions) COVID-19, we are encouraged by recent homebuyer demand as 20 well as mortgage rates that should remain at record lows for the foreseeable future” 16 (1) - Sam Khater, Chief Economist, Freddie Mac (Jun 2020) 12 “…we believe the further reduction of mortgage rates, persistently 8 low levels of supply, and strong buyer sentiment compared to seller sentiment should continue to provide support to home prices and 4 new construction…We also expect the extremely low mortgage rate environment to contribute to historically high levels of refinancing 0 activity as household balance sheets and incomes improve” Sep-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Feb-20 Mar-20 May-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 (1) - Doug Duncan, Chief Economist, Fannie Mae (Jun 2020) Source: Freddie Mac, First American Financial, Black Knight Mortgage Monitor (July 2020) 1. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 153 Current Macro Backdrop Expected to Provide a Significant Tailwind to Our Mortgage Business Mortgage Rates Are at Historic Lows... ...Which has Fueled Record Mortgage Activity... 30-yr Fixed-Rate Mortgage Monthly Closed Title Orders (thousands) 6% 120 4% 80 99 4.0% 67 2.9% 2% 40 0% 0 Dec-17 Jun-18 Jan-19 Jul-19 Feb-20 Sep-20 Dec-17 Jun-18 Nov-18 Apr-19 Sep-19 Feb-20 Jul-20 ...and There is a Historically High Backlog of Mortgage Refinancing Candidates That Should Provide Years of Demand “While the housing market undoubtedly has felt the effects of Refinance Candidates (millions) COVID-19, we are encouraged by recent homebuyer demand as 20 well as mortgage rates that should remain at record lows for the foreseeable future” 16 (1) - Sam Khater, Chief Economist, Freddie Mac (Jun 2020) 12 “…we believe the further reduction of mortgage rates, persistently 8 low levels of supply, and strong buyer sentiment compared to seller sentiment should continue to provide support to home prices and 4 new construction…We also expect the extremely low mortgage rate environment to contribute to historically high levels of refinancing 0 activity as household balance sheets and incomes improve” Sep-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 Feb-20 Mar-20 May-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 (1) - Doug Duncan, Chief Economist, Fannie Mae (Jun 2020) Source: Freddie Mac, First American Financial, Black Knight Mortgage Monitor (July 2020) 1. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15

4 Highly Recurring Revenue Buffers Us From Mortgage Cyclicality, Increasing Visibility Into Our Outlook (1) ~95% of Revenue is Recurring ü Long-term customer relationships with exceptionally high renewal rates underpin our 5% Non-recurring recurring revenue: ü Our data is deeply embedded in the workflows of our customers ü Recurring revenue principally comprised of single- or multi-year arrangements, often with auto- renewal provisions 55% 40% Recurring ü Variable recurring revenues are Recurring fixed those arrangements tied to the [ [X] X]% % variable ( (2 2) ) R R [X ecu ecu ]% rrin rring g units of volume, transactional [X]% (2) Recurring services or reports consumed by (2) Recurring our clients ü Non-recurring products and services complement our recurring business in strengthening our customer relationships 1. Represents revenue mix post-divestitures ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 164 Highly Recurring Revenue Buffers Us From Mortgage Cyclicality, Increasing Visibility Into Our Outlook (1) ~95% of Revenue is Recurring ü Long-term customer relationships with exceptionally high renewal rates underpin our 5% Non-recurring recurring revenue: ü Our data is deeply embedded in the workflows of our customers ü Recurring revenue principally comprised of single- or multi-year arrangements, often with auto- renewal provisions 55% 40% Recurring ü Variable recurring revenues are Recurring fixed those arrangements tied to the [ [X] X]% % variable ( (2 2) ) R R [X ecu ecu ]% rrin rring g units of volume, transactional [X]% (2) Recurring services or reports consumed by (2) Recurring our clients ü Non-recurring products and services complement our recurring business in strengthening our customer relationships 1. Represents revenue mix post-divestitures ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16

4 Strong Cash Flow + High Visibility in Business Growth = Increased Capital Return Total Capital Returned ($ in millions) ü Achieved 55-65% free cash (1) flow conversion over last Prior Cumulative ~2,738 (4) 5 years ~289 Periodic ~2,449 Projected (3) ü Recently increased ~393 quarterly dividend by 50% ~2,056 ü Share repurchase (2) ~595 expected to be $500 1,461 million in FY 2020, $300 1,374 million in FY 2021 and 1,265 $200 million in FY 2022 1,058 863 (1) 766 ü Robust free cash flow 674 enables leverage to 433 remain <3.5x while 207 executing substantial repurchase program 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020E 2021E 2022E 1. For the definition of free cash flow, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. Assumes $44m of completed share repurchases and dividends in 1H 2020 and ~$551m of forecasted share repurchases (~$500m) and dividends (~$51m) in H2 2020 3. Assumes ~$300m of forecasted share repurchases and ~$93m of dividends in 2021 4. Assumes ~$200m of forecasted share repurchases and ~$89m of dividends in 2022 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 174 Strong Cash Flow + High Visibility in Business Growth = Increased Capital Return Total Capital Returned ($ in millions) ü Achieved 55-65% free cash (1) flow conversion over last Prior Cumulative ~2,738 (4) 5 years ~289 Periodic ~2,449 Projected (3) ü Recently increased ~393 quarterly dividend by 50% ~2,056 ü Share repurchase (2) ~595 expected to be $500 1,461 million in FY 2020, $300 1,374 million in FY 2021 and 1,265 $200 million in FY 2022 1,058 863 (1) 766 ü Robust free cash flow 674 enables leverage to 433 remain <3.5x while 207 executing substantial repurchase program 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020E 2021E 2022E 1. For the definition of free cash flow, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. Assumes $44m of completed share repurchases and dividends in 1H 2020 and ~$551m of forecasted share repurchases (~$500m) and dividends (~$51m) in H2 2020 3. Assumes ~$300m of forecasted share repurchases and ~$93m of dividends in 2021 4. Assumes ~$200m of forecasted share repurchases and ~$89m of dividends in 2022 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17

4 We Expect Our Planned Divestitures to Increase Non-Mortgage Mix And Expand Margins § Two divestiture processes underway: Non-Mortgage Adjusted Tenant Screening and Credit Solutions (1) Forecast: % ’21 Revenue EBITDA Margin businesses ~35% ~45% – Advisors retained to conduct sale process (2) ~32% § We expect divestitures to enhance our financial profile and business mix and 30%: ~40% improve our margins 2020 adjusted (1) EBITDA margin commitment – Accelerate towards a more highly 28% recurring and high quality revenue mix (1) – 2020 adjusted EBITDA margin would be ~35% (pro forma for ~9%: divestitures) 2019 operating – Reduce cyclicality by divesting margin businesses with high mortgage (3) 2019 2020E 2020E Today Pro Forma market sensitivity Pro (3) Forma 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 2. Based on adjusted EBITDA guidance as of 9/22/2020 3. Pro forma for the planned divestitures as if consummated on 12/31/19 for illustrative purposes only ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 184 We Expect Our Planned Divestitures to Increase Non-Mortgage Mix And Expand Margins § Two divestiture processes underway: Non-Mortgage Adjusted Tenant Screening and Credit Solutions (1) Forecast: % ’21 Revenue EBITDA Margin businesses ~35% ~45% – Advisors retained to conduct sale process (2) ~32% § We expect divestitures to enhance our financial profile and business mix and 30%: ~40% improve our margins 2020 adjusted (1) EBITDA margin commitment – Accelerate towards a more highly 28% recurring and high quality revenue mix (1) – 2020 adjusted EBITDA margin would be ~35% (pro forma for ~9%: divestitures) 2019 operating – Reduce cyclicality by divesting margin businesses with high mortgage (3) 2019 2020E 2020E Today Pro Forma market sensitivity Pro (3) Forma 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 2. Based on adjusted EBITDA guidance as of 9/22/2020 3. Pro forma for the planned divestitures as if consummated on 12/31/19 for illustrative purposes only ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 18

Sell-Side Research Has Been Highly Supportive of CoreLogic’s Performance and Outlook “We reiterate our Buy and lift our PT to $80 (12.9x C21E EBITDA). We argue CLGX is undervalued, owing to strong FCF and improving non-Mortgage fundamentals. While the company is tied to [mortgage] volumes - and a debate will likely continue around long-term guidance – we contend new non-Mortgage wins will boost organic revenue growth and valuation. CLGX trades at just 11.3x C21E EBITDA. This compares with Info Services peers trading at ~22x. We expect 1-3x multiple expansion as organic revenue growth approaches 5% and EBITDA margin reaches 35%.” (1) -JULY 23, 2020 “We roll forward our PT from YE20 to YE21 and apply ~12x-13x EV/EBITDA multiple on our 2022 adj. EBITDA of $626mm (~$15mm below guidance midpoint), resulting in a $76 PT. Over the upcoming quarters we will watch for evidence of organic growth and see potential for a higher multiple if organic/non-origination driven acceleration and/or market share traction is demonstrated.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “If CLGX is able to meet the high end of its 2021 revenue⁄EBITDA guidance, the stock could trade at a 1x premium to our 12x base case multiple and trade to $82⁄share.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 The company appears poised for significant operational, strategic and/or financial changes that should benefit shareholders one way or another, which we view as important for justifying the company’s recent step-up in valuation.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “Even if the bid comes up empty, we do believe that CLGX will be better off as a company when the dust settles no matter the outcome as management has already put into motion several value creation drivers (strategy in place/tied to multiyear financial targets, cleaning up the core with necessary divestitures, turbo-charging innovation, more generous capital returns, etc.) all of which should have positive and lasting LT effects.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “As a result of the company’s higher revenue base and stronger margin prospects, we have increased our multiple assessments of its operations and are now estimating a fair value EV/EBITDA multiple of 12x+. Based on these multiples and our 2021 estimates, we are projecting a 12-month forward fair value of $68.50 - $70.50/shr, with the bottom end of this range in line with current trading levels.” (1) -JULY 29, 2020 1. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19Sell-Side Research Has Been Highly Supportive of CoreLogic’s Performance and Outlook “We reiterate our Buy and lift our PT to $80 (12.9x C21E EBITDA). We argue CLGX is undervalued, owing to strong FCF and improving non-Mortgage fundamentals. While the company is tied to [mortgage] volumes - and a debate will likely continue around long-term guidance – we contend new non-Mortgage wins will boost organic revenue growth and valuation. CLGX trades at just 11.3x C21E EBITDA. This compares with Info Services peers trading at ~22x. We expect 1-3x multiple expansion as organic revenue growth approaches 5% and EBITDA margin reaches 35%.” (1) -JULY 23, 2020 “We roll forward our PT from YE20 to YE21 and apply ~12x-13x EV/EBITDA multiple on our 2022 adj. EBITDA of $626mm (~$15mm below guidance midpoint), resulting in a $76 PT. Over the upcoming quarters we will watch for evidence of organic growth and see potential for a higher multiple if organic/non-origination driven acceleration and/or market share traction is demonstrated.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “If CLGX is able to meet the high end of its 2021 revenue⁄EBITDA guidance, the stock could trade at a 1x premium to our 12x base case multiple and trade to $82⁄share.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 The company appears poised for significant operational, strategic and/or financial changes that should benefit shareholders one way or another, which we view as important for justifying the company’s recent step-up in valuation.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “Even if the bid comes up empty, we do believe that CLGX will be better off as a company when the dust settles no matter the outcome as management has already put into motion several value creation drivers (strategy in place/tied to multiyear financial targets, cleaning up the core with necessary divestitures, turbo-charging innovation, more generous capital returns, etc.) all of which should have positive and lasting LT effects.” (1) -JULY 24, 2020 “As a result of the company’s higher revenue base and stronger margin prospects, we have increased our multiple assessments of its operations and are now estimating a fair value EV/EBITDA multiple of 12x+. Based on these multiples and our 2021 estimates, we are projecting a 12-month forward fair value of $68.50 - $70.50/shr, with the bottom end of this range in line with current trading levels.” (1) -JULY 29, 2020 1. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 19

Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Materially Undervalues CoreLogic and Raises Serious Regulatory ConcernsOur Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Materially Undervalues CoreLogic and Raises Serious Regulatory Concerns

Senator/Cannae’s $66 Per Share Proposal Implies No Premium § Our strong performance to date would have already moved our share price significantly higher – At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator/Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price (1) based on our current 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance would now be in the ~$67 - ~$69 range § Even if Senator/Cannae’s proposed multiple were appropriate, it should justify a much higher price – The initial offer was made at ~13.4x our previous FY 2020 guidance; applying that same multiple to our updated FY 2020 guidance would suggest an “initial” offer in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § Senator/Cannae are asking shareholders to ignore CoreLogic's transformation into a higher-growth, higher-margin, less mortgage-dependent business now poised for multiple expansion (1) – CoreLogic has higher 2019 – 2022E revenue growth and comparable adjusted EBITDA margins to our information services (2) (2) peer set , but we trade at more than a 4x discount to the lowest multiple amongst our information services peers (15.8x) (2) and a ~11x discount to the median multiple of our peers (~22x) (3) – Recent transactions in the sector have occurred at significantly higher multiples (~23x for Ellie Mae, ~30x for Optimal Blue) (4) – Each 1x of multiple expansion would add ~$7-8/share to our value, before any discussion of appropriate takeover premium § Cannae has used this sleight-of-hand to its advantage before – In 2019 it acquired Dun & Bradstreet at, in our view, a low price, implemented aggressive short-term cost cuts, and captured the multiple arbitrage for itself at the expense of the D&B’s public shareholders § Our revenue trajectory and margin profile, as research analysts have noted, are consistent with publicly-traded information service providers: “We argue CLGX is undervalued, owing to strong FCF and improving non-Mortgage fundamentals… we expect 1-3x multiple expansion as organic revenue growth approaches 5% and EBITDA margin reaches 35%.” (5) -JULY 23, 2020 Senator/Cannae bought over 2 million CLGX shares on June 26, after making their proposal, at prices as high as $68.27, making it clear they must believe our shares to be worth more than $66 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. FactSet as of 9/18/20; Based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer 3. http://public.viavid.com/player/index.php?id=140856; https://s2.q4cdn.com/154085107/files/doc_presentations/2020/ICE_Ellie-Mae_Transaction_vF2.pdf 4. For example, at $67.34 (the closing stock price on September 18, 2020), CoreLogic has a total enterprise value ( TEV ) of approximately $7.0 billion, which represents an 11.2x TEV / FY 2020 estimated adjusted EBITDA multiple; increasing this multiple to 12.2x would imply a share price of $74.96 - an increase of $7.62 - holding other assumptions constant 5. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20Senator/Cannae’s $66 Per Share Proposal Implies No Premium § Our strong performance to date would have already moved our share price significantly higher – At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator/Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price (1) based on our current 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance would now be in the ~$67 - ~$69 range § Even if Senator/Cannae’s proposed multiple were appropriate, it should justify a much higher price – The initial offer was made at ~13.4x our previous FY 2020 guidance; applying that same multiple to our updated FY 2020 guidance would suggest an “initial” offer in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § Senator/Cannae are asking shareholders to ignore CoreLogic's transformation into a higher-growth, higher-margin, less mortgage-dependent business now poised for multiple expansion (1) – CoreLogic has higher 2019 – 2022E revenue growth and comparable adjusted EBITDA margins to our information services (2) (2) peer set , but we trade at more than a 4x discount to the lowest multiple amongst our information services peers (15.8x) (2) and a ~11x discount to the median multiple of our peers (~22x) (3) – Recent transactions in the sector have occurred at significantly higher multiples (~23x for Ellie Mae, ~30x for Optimal Blue) (4) – Each 1x of multiple expansion would add ~$7-8/share to our value, before any discussion of appropriate takeover premium § Cannae has used this sleight-of-hand to its advantage before – In 2019 it acquired Dun & Bradstreet at, in our view, a low price, implemented aggressive short-term cost cuts, and captured the multiple arbitrage for itself at the expense of the D&B’s public shareholders § Our revenue trajectory and margin profile, as research analysts have noted, are consistent with publicly-traded information service providers: “We argue CLGX is undervalued, owing to strong FCF and improving non-Mortgage fundamentals… we expect 1-3x multiple expansion as organic revenue growth approaches 5% and EBITDA margin reaches 35%.” (5) -JULY 23, 2020 Senator/Cannae bought over 2 million CLGX shares on June 26, after making their proposal, at prices as high as $68.27, making it clear they must believe our shares to be worth more than $66 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. FactSet as of 9/18/20; Based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer 3. http://public.viavid.com/player/index.php?id=140856; https://s2.q4cdn.com/154085107/files/doc_presentations/2020/ICE_Ellie-Mae_Transaction_vF2.pdf 4. For example, at $67.34 (the closing stock price on September 18, 2020), CoreLogic has a total enterprise value ( TEV ) of approximately $7.0 billion, which represents an 11.2x TEV / FY 2020 estimated adjusted EBITDA multiple; increasing this multiple to 12.2x would imply a share price of $74.96 - an increase of $7.62 - holding other assumptions constant 5. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 20

Why CoreLogic Is Poised for Multiple Re-Rating CoreLogic Exhibits All the Hallmarks of Leading Information Services Providers Trading at Significantly Higher Multiples #1 property data provider to a Leadership Position (1) ~$34 trillion market . Long-term in a Large and P customer relationships with Growing Market exceptionally high renewal rates The industry information Scale Economies and currency deeply embedded P Resilient Business Model in client workflows Mid to upper single-digit growth with Recurring and ~95% recurring revenue and P Growing Revenue approaching ~50% non-mortgage ~35% pro forma adjusted Must-Have (2) EBITDA margin with visibility P Data & Insights into continued margin expansion 1. Zillow estimate for the 2019 total U.S. housing market 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21Why CoreLogic Is Poised for Multiple Re-Rating CoreLogic Exhibits All the Hallmarks of Leading Information Services Providers Trading at Significantly Higher Multiples #1 property data provider to a Leadership Position (1) ~$34 trillion market . Long-term in a Large and P customer relationships with Growing Market exceptionally high renewal rates The industry information Scale Economies and currency deeply embedded P Resilient Business Model in client workflows Mid to upper single-digit growth with Recurring and ~95% recurring revenue and P Growing Revenue approaching ~50% non-mortgage ~35% pro forma adjusted Must-Have (2) EBITDA margin with visibility P Data & Insights into continued margin expansion 1. Zillow estimate for the 2019 total U.S. housing market 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21

Comparable Companies with Similar Growth and Margin Profiles Trade at Much Higher Multiples... (1) 2019A – 2022E Revenue CAGR 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Margin (2) (5) CoreLogic: 6% CoreLogic PF: ~35% 49% 13% Info Svcs Median: 5% Info Svcs Median: 35% 43% 41% 38% 35% 35% 34% 34% 32% 32% 30% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% (1) TEV / 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Multiple Summary (6) 54.6x CoreLogic: 11.2x Info Svcs Median: 21.7x 33.1x 24.1x 23.2x 21.8x 21.7x 20.2x 19.0x 16.5x 16.3x 15.8x CSGP FICO VRSK EXPN TRI DNB INFO TRU EFX REL WKL Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings Note: CSGP = CoStar, DNB = Dun & Bradstreet, EFX = Equifax, EXPN = Experian, FICO = Fair Isaac, INFO = IHS Markit, REL = RELX, TRI = Thomson Reuters, TRU = TransUnion, VRSK = Verisk, WKL = Wolters Kluwer 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. 2019A revenue Includes a ~$70m adjustment related to the completion of the AMC transformation program and exit of non-core default technology operations. 2022E revenue reflects the midpoint of Management guidance ($2,020m) 3. Pro forma for acquisitions of STR and Ten-X Commercial 4. Reflects fiscal year 2020E – 2022E revenue CAGR. All other metrics reflect calendar year-end financials 5. Reflects CoreLogic pro forma for planned divestitures if consummated on 12/31/19 for illustrative purposes only 6. Adjusted EBITDA based on the midpoint of 2020 guidance ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22Comparable Companies with Similar Growth and Margin Profiles Trade at Much Higher Multiples... (1) 2019A – 2022E Revenue CAGR 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Margin (2) (5) CoreLogic: 6% CoreLogic PF: ~35% 49% 13% Info Svcs Median: 5% Info Svcs Median: 35% 43% 41% 38% 35% 35% 34% 34% 32% 32% 30% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% (1) TEV / 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Multiple Summary (6) 54.6x CoreLogic: 11.2x Info Svcs Median: 21.7x 33.1x 24.1x 23.2x 21.8x 21.7x 20.2x 19.0x 16.5x 16.3x 15.8x CSGP FICO VRSK EXPN TRI DNB INFO TRU EFX REL WKL Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings Note: CSGP = CoStar, DNB = Dun & Bradstreet, EFX = Equifax, EXPN = Experian, FICO = Fair Isaac, INFO = IHS Markit, REL = RELX, TRI = Thomson Reuters, TRU = TransUnion, VRSK = Verisk, WKL = Wolters Kluwer 1. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 2. 2019A revenue Includes a ~$70m adjustment related to the completion of the AMC transformation program and exit of non-core default technology operations. 2022E revenue reflects the midpoint of Management guidance ($2,020m) 3. Pro forma for acquisitions of STR and Ten-X Commercial 4. Reflects fiscal year 2020E – 2022E revenue CAGR. All other metrics reflect calendar year-end financials 5. Reflects CoreLogic pro forma for planned divestitures if consummated on 12/31/19 for illustrative purposes only 6. Adjusted EBITDA based on the midpoint of 2020 guidance ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22

...Implying a Value Significantly Above Senator / Cannae’s Proposal $135+ Illustrative Value Expansion Opportunity For Current Shareholders Over Time Implied CoreLogic (1) Reference Multiples Share Price ~$89 ~$96 Initial Senator / Cannae ~$81 (2) ~$84 Proposal Multiple: ~13.4x ~$74 Pre-Proposal Trading ~$66 ~$67 ~$68 (3) Multiple: ~11.3x $66 Senator/Cannae Proposal Price Illustrative 2020E Trading Multiples (4) CoreLogic 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Multiple (5) Illustrative Info Services Multiples 11.0x 11.2x 12.0x 13.0x 14.0x ~15.0x - 20.0x+ Current info services multiples demonstrate the tremendous re-rating opportunity as CoreLogic delivers on its plan Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings 1. Based on 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA ($623m) 2. Multiple implied by Senator / Cannae’s initial $65/share proposal and 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 3. Reflects CoreLogic’s trading multiple based on 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 4. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 5. Illustrative multiple range and implied prices based on the multiples of info services companies included on page 22 and CoreLogic’s 2020E adjusted EBITDA ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23...Implying a Value Significantly Above Senator / Cannae’s Proposal $135+ Illustrative Value Expansion Opportunity For Current Shareholders Over Time Implied CoreLogic (1) Reference Multiples Share Price ~$89 ~$96 Initial Senator / Cannae ~$81 (2) ~$84 Proposal Multiple: ~13.4x ~$74 Pre-Proposal Trading ~$66 ~$67 ~$68 (3) Multiple: ~11.3x $66 Senator/Cannae Proposal Price Illustrative 2020E Trading Multiples (4) CoreLogic 2020E Adjusted EBITDA Multiple (5) Illustrative Info Services Multiples 11.0x 11.2x 12.0x 13.0x 14.0x ~15.0x - 20.0x+ Current info services multiples demonstrate the tremendous re-rating opportunity as CoreLogic delivers on its plan Source: FactSet (9/18/20), Company filings 1. Based on 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA ($623m) 2. Multiple implied by Senator / Cannae’s initial $65/share proposal and 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 3. Reflects CoreLogic’s trading multiple based on 2020E Management guidance midpoint adjusted EBITDA (~$513m) at the time immediately prior to the launch of the hostile proposal 4. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see “Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures” on page 1 5. Illustrative multiple range and implied prices based on the multiples of info services companies included on page 22 and CoreLogic’s 2020E adjusted EBITDA ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23

Our Board Determined Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Has Significant Regulatory and Completion Risk § Neither regulators nor market participants are buying Senator/Cannae's cavalier disregard for what our highly- qualified and independent Board has determined to be significant antitrust issues embedded in their proposal – The FTC has issued a subpoena and civil investigative demand to CoreLogic and opened an investigation into the potential transaction without prompting by us (1) – We believe Senator/Cannae (and possibly other “Foley Network” companies) have received similar subpoenas (based on FTC practice and statements in the subpoena and civil investigative demand received by CoreLogic), but they have not made any related disclosures – Interestingly, Cannae has not submitted an HSR filing to acquire CoreLogic § Bill Foley has personally experienced, but isn't acknowledging to CoreLogic shareholders, the adverse impact on target shareholders of failing to obtain regulatory approval – Fidelity National’s proposed acquisition of Stewart Information Services was abandoned immediately after the FTC sued to block the acquisition on competition grounds – In the aftermath, Stewart’s stock was substantially damaged, losing 21% of its value (in an up market) from announcement in March 2018 to termination of the deal in September 2019 (1) § The links and influence among the “Foley Network” that raise regulatory concerns were also recently raised by the City of Miami General Employees and Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust when they filed a (2) lawsuit on August 7, 2020 accusing Foley of operating a “veritable spider’s web of inter-related corporate (3) entities” through which he has “skimmed millions of dollars for his own benefit.” § Senator/Cannae have refused to provide detail about their committed sources of equity CoStar’s CEO Acknowledged the Anti-Trust Issues on an Earnings Call: “I had thought we were aggressive in acquiring Ten-X in a friendly deal during a lockdown. But I must say that even leaving aside the clear antitrust issues, Foley has one-upped us with the aggressiveness of seeking to operate a company acquired in a hostile takeover in the midst of a pandemic.” (4) -ANDREW FLORANCE, COSTAR GROUP CEO, JULY 28, 2020 1. The “Foley Network” is comprised of numerous public companies, SPACs and private investment firms where Foley exerts significant influence, including Black Knight, Cannae, Dun & Bradstreet, FNF and Trasimene Capital, among many others 2. “City of Miami General Employees and Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust vs. William P. Foley II, No. 2020-0650, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington)” 3. Feeley, Jef. “Fidelity National’s Chairman Sued Over Buyout of Firm He Controlled.” Bloomberg, August 10, 2020 4. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24Our Board Determined Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Has Significant Regulatory and Completion Risk § Neither regulators nor market participants are buying Senator/Cannae's cavalier disregard for what our highly- qualified and independent Board has determined to be significant antitrust issues embedded in their proposal – The FTC has issued a subpoena and civil investigative demand to CoreLogic and opened an investigation into the potential transaction without prompting by us (1) – We believe Senator/Cannae (and possibly other “Foley Network” companies) have received similar subpoenas (based on FTC practice and statements in the subpoena and civil investigative demand received by CoreLogic), but they have not made any related disclosures – Interestingly, Cannae has not submitted an HSR filing to acquire CoreLogic § Bill Foley has personally experienced, but isn't acknowledging to CoreLogic shareholders, the adverse impact on target shareholders of failing to obtain regulatory approval – Fidelity National’s proposed acquisition of Stewart Information Services was abandoned immediately after the FTC sued to block the acquisition on competition grounds – In the aftermath, Stewart’s stock was substantially damaged, losing 21% of its value (in an up market) from announcement in March 2018 to termination of the deal in September 2019 (1) § The links and influence among the “Foley Network” that raise regulatory concerns were also recently raised by the City of Miami General Employees and Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust when they filed a (2) lawsuit on August 7, 2020 accusing Foley of operating a “veritable spider’s web of inter-related corporate (3) entities” through which he has “skimmed millions of dollars for his own benefit.” § Senator/Cannae have refused to provide detail about their committed sources of equity CoStar’s CEO Acknowledged the Anti-Trust Issues on an Earnings Call: “I had thought we were aggressive in acquiring Ten-X in a friendly deal during a lockdown. But I must say that even leaving aside the clear antitrust issues, Foley has one-upped us with the aggressiveness of seeking to operate a company acquired in a hostile takeover in the midst of a pandemic.” (4) -ANDREW FLORANCE, COSTAR GROUP CEO, JULY 28, 2020 1. The “Foley Network” is comprised of numerous public companies, SPACs and private investment firms where Foley exerts significant influence, including Black Knight, Cannae, Dun & Bradstreet, FNF and Trasimene Capital, among many others 2. “City of Miami General Employees and Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust vs. William P. Foley II, No. 2020-0650, Delaware Chancery Court (Wilmington)” 3. Feeley, Jef. “Fidelity National’s Chairman Sued Over Buyout of Firm He Controlled.” Bloomberg, August 10, 2020 4. Permission to use quotes neither sought nor obtained ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24

We Have Assembled A Fit-For-Purpose Board To Oversee Our Continued Execution and Evaluate All Pathways to ValueWe Have Assembled A Fit-For-Purpose Board To Oversee Our Continued Execution and Evaluate All Pathways to Value

Our Board Has Substantial M&A Experience Paul F. Folino (C) $9.9bn $23mm $392mm $349mm $295mm Former Chairman sale to acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of & CEO, Emulex Frank D. Martell $661mm $475mm $120mm $64mm $45mm Collateral $13mm $25mm President & CEO, Solutions sale to acquisitions of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of CoreLogic Douglas C. Curling Principal & $4.0bn Managing Director, sale to New Kent Capital Treasury Services John C. Dorman Corporation Former Chairman & $396mm $1.3bn sale to $127mm sale to $120mm sale to acquisition of Interim CEO, Online Resources Vikrant Raina Partner, majority stake sale to acquisition of acquisition of BV Investment acquisition of Partners Jaynie Miller Studenmund $2.7bn $977mm $5.6bn sale to $5.2bn sale to $2.1bn sale to $1.9bn sale to acquisition of Former COO, acquisition of Overture Services David F. Walker $141mm Former Partner, Arthur Andersen sale to ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25Our Board Has Substantial M&A Experience Paul F. Folino (C) $9.9bn $23mm $392mm $349mm $295mm Former Chairman sale to acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of & CEO, Emulex Frank D. Martell $661mm $475mm $120mm $64mm $45mm Collateral $13mm $25mm President & CEO, Solutions sale to acquisitions of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of acquisition of CoreLogic Douglas C. Curling Principal & $4.0bn Managing Director, sale to New Kent Capital Treasury Services John C. Dorman Corporation Former Chairman & $396mm $1.3bn sale to $127mm sale to $120mm sale to acquisition of Interim CEO, Online Resources Vikrant Raina Partner, majority stake sale to acquisition of acquisition of BV Investment acquisition of Partners Jaynie Miller Studenmund $2.7bn $977mm $5.6bn sale to $5.2bn sale to $2.1bn sale to $1.9bn sale to acquisition of Former COO, acquisition of Overture Services David F. Walker $141mm Former Partner, Arthur Andersen sale to ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25

Our Directors’ Expertise Aligns with Our Long-Term Strategy Insurance / Public Company Private Equity / Director Real Estate / Financial / M&A CEO / CFO / COO Investing Technology Paul F. FolinoPPP Frank D. Martell PPPP J. David Chatham PPP Douglas C. CurlingPPPP John C. Dorman PPPP Claudia Fan Munce PPP Thomas C. O’BrienPPP Vikrant Raina PPP J. Michael Shepherd PP Jaynie Miller PPP Studenmund David F. WalkerPP Pamela H. P Patenaude 7 of 12 12 of 12 9 of 12 7 of 12 Directors Directors Directors Directors ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26Our Directors’ Expertise Aligns with Our Long-Term Strategy Insurance / Public Company Private Equity / Director Real Estate / Financial / M&A CEO / CFO / COO Investing Technology Paul F. FolinoPPP Frank D. Martell PPPP J. David Chatham PPP Douglas C. CurlingPPPP John C. Dorman PPPP Claudia Fan Munce PPP Thomas C. O’BrienPPP Vikrant Raina PPP J. Michael Shepherd PP Jaynie Miller PPP Studenmund David F. WalkerPP Pamela H. P Patenaude 7 of 12 12 of 12 9 of 12 7 of 12 Directors Directors Directors Directors ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26

CoreLogic’s Board has Overseen the Transformation Into A Data & Technology Powerhouse A History of Executing Transactions to Drive Shareholder Value July 2013: Acquired MSB, DataQuick December 2018: February 2018: Information and the credit / flood services Acquired HomeVisit Acquired eTech operations of DataQuick Lender Solutions and Symbility December 2015: August 2017: Acquired April 2018: September 2019: Acquired FNC, provider of real Clareity, Mercury Acquired a la mode Acquired National estate collateral IT Network and Myriad technologies Tax Search 2013 – 2017 2018 – Present December 2013: December 2018: Exited AMPS (Default Announced accelerated Services) Segment AMC transformation September 2019: Exited loan origination software unit and default management platforms ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 27 Divestitures AcquisitionsCoreLogic’s Board has Overseen the Transformation Into A Data & Technology Powerhouse A History of Executing Transactions to Drive Shareholder Value July 2013: Acquired MSB, DataQuick December 2018: February 2018: Information and the credit / flood services Acquired HomeVisit Acquired eTech operations of DataQuick Lender Solutions and Symbility December 2015: August 2017: Acquired April 2018: September 2019: Acquired FNC, provider of real Clareity, Mercury Acquired a la mode Acquired National estate collateral IT Network and Myriad technologies Tax Search 2013 – 2017 2018 – Present December 2013: December 2018: Exited AMPS (Default Announced accelerated Services) Segment AMC transformation September 2019: Exited loan origination software unit and default management platforms ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 27 Divestitures Acquisitions

Our Board Plays a Critical Role in Oversight Shareholder-friendly Governance… …Coupled With Strong, Regular Oversight P Committed to annual self-evaluations Independent Chairman for the Board and each of its committees Annually-elected directors P Independent Board (11 of 12 independent directors) Shareholders may act by written consent P Four new independent directors added in the past three years Shareholders can call special meetings P Fully independent Audit, Compensation Opted out of Section 203 of and Nominating and Corporate Delaware General Corporation Law Governance Committees Majority voting standard P The Board regularly holds executive sessions without management team members present Compensation correlated with performance – CEO pay was 0.87x the peer median P CoreLogic Board is held responsible for overseeing key business risks and Short-term shareholder rights plan regulating management processes ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 28Our Board Plays a Critical Role in Oversight Shareholder-friendly Governance… …Coupled With Strong, Regular Oversight P Committed to annual self-evaluations Independent Chairman for the Board and each of its committees Annually-elected directors P Independent Board (11 of 12 independent directors) Shareholders may act by written consent P Four new independent directors added in the past three years Shareholders can call special meetings P Fully independent Audit, Compensation Opted out of Section 203 of and Nominating and Corporate Delaware General Corporation Law Governance Committees Majority voting standard P The Board regularly holds executive sessions without management team members present Compensation correlated with performance – CEO pay was 0.87x the peer median P CoreLogic Board is held responsible for overseeing key business risks and Short-term shareholder rights plan regulating management processes ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 28

Our Board is Independent, Diverse and Engaged Strong Board and management team that regularly bring in new perspectives, and who have proven track records of success in their prior roles Douglas C. Curling Frank D. Martell J. David Chatham Paul F. Folino (C) Principal & Managing President & CEO, President & CEO, Former Chairman & CEO, Director, New CoreLogic Chatham Holdings Emulex Kent Capital • Significant expertise in • Internal executive leadership • Significant experience in real • Operational background and information technology and capacities for 8+ years estate with deep understanding board experience with deep intellectual property• Intimate knowledge of Company of mortgage, valuation and knowledge of operating a publicly • Strong executive background culture, operations, strategy, appraisal businesses and traded data business, the • Extensive public director financial and competitive position residential and commercial real insurance industry, data experience estate markets monetization and growth • Broad executive and board strategies experience John C. Dorman Pamela H. Patenaude Claudia Fan Munce Thomas C. O’Brien Former Chairman & Former Deputy Secretary, Venture Advisor, Former President & CEO, Interim CEO, U.S. Department of Housing New Enterprise Associates Insurance Auto Auctions Online Resources and Urban Development • Valuable insights on operational, • Certified as a cybersecurity • Valued management insights • Relevant insight and expertise technology and growth strategies, oversight director by the NACD from prior CEO experience from a career focused on housing the financial innovation space • Experience in identifying • Leadership skills, board policy and community and board logistics as prior CEO of emerging technologies and experience and background in development a technology service provider helping firms advance growth via corporate governance during rapid growth and technology, innovation and expansion strategy J. Michael Shepherd Vikrant Raina Jaynie Miller Studenmund David F. Walker Chairman and Former Partner, Former COO, Former Partner, President & CEO, BV Investment Partners Overture Services Arthur Andersen Bank of the West • Experience in identifying • Unique perspective via • Executive operating experience • CPA and certified fraud examiner emerging technologies and combination of former public with fast growing, innovative with extensive experience in helping firms advance growth service, regulatory and financial companies public accounting and on • Knowledge of technology and housing policy experience, as well • Extensive public director corporate boards data services, business services, as top-tier commercial and retail experience• Expertise in financial reporting, risk management and investment banking leadership controls and risk management strategies Four Recent Additions to Board (C) = Independent Chairman ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 29Our Board is Independent, Diverse and Engaged Strong Board and management team that regularly bring in new perspectives, and who have proven track records of success in their prior roles Douglas C. Curling Frank D. Martell J. David Chatham Paul F. Folino (C) Principal & Managing President & CEO, President & CEO, Former Chairman & CEO, Director, New CoreLogic Chatham Holdings Emulex Kent Capital • Significant expertise in • Internal executive leadership • Significant experience in real • Operational background and information technology and capacities for 8+ years estate with deep understanding board experience with deep intellectual property• Intimate knowledge of Company of mortgage, valuation and knowledge of operating a publicly • Strong executive background culture, operations, strategy, appraisal businesses and traded data business, the • Extensive public director financial and competitive position residential and commercial real insurance industry, data experience estate markets monetization and growth • Broad executive and board strategies experience John C. Dorman Pamela H. Patenaude Claudia Fan Munce Thomas C. O’Brien Former Chairman & Former Deputy Secretary, Venture Advisor, Former President & CEO, Interim CEO, U.S. Department of Housing New Enterprise Associates Insurance Auto Auctions Online Resources and Urban Development • Valuable insights on operational, • Certified as a cybersecurity • Valued management insights • Relevant insight and expertise technology and growth strategies, oversight director by the NACD from prior CEO experience from a career focused on housing the financial innovation space • Experience in identifying • Leadership skills, board policy and community and board logistics as prior CEO of emerging technologies and experience and background in development a technology service provider helping firms advance growth via corporate governance during rapid growth and technology, innovation and expansion strategy J. Michael Shepherd Vikrant Raina Jaynie Miller Studenmund David F. Walker Chairman and Former Partner, Former COO, Former Partner, President & CEO, BV Investment Partners Overture Services Arthur Andersen Bank of the West • Experience in identifying • Unique perspective via • Executive operating experience • CPA and certified fraud examiner emerging technologies and combination of former public with fast growing, innovative with extensive experience in helping firms advance growth service, regulatory and financial companies public accounting and on • Knowledge of technology and housing policy experience, as well • Extensive public director corporate boards data services, business services, as top-tier commercial and retail experience• Expertise in financial reporting, risk management and investment banking leadership controls and risk management strategies Four Recent Additions to Board (C) = Independent Chairman ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 29

Despite Senator/Cannae’s Best Efforts to Portray Otherwise, CoreLogic Has Engaged & Evaluated The Proposal in Good Faith § Members of our Board and management met with Senator/Cannae to understand their position on CoreLogic and whether we could address the value and certainty issues with the proposal – At their request, we discussed the value drivers behind our numbers that we have publicly disclosed – We also asked them questions about their proposal and to tell us about their committed sources of equity, which they refused to provide – Senator/Cannae, on the other hand, never engaged with CoreLogic about a potential transaction before launching their hostile proposal § Senator/Cannae continue to request further due diligence despite our release of multi-year forecasts and substantial detail for all shareholders – CoreLogic essentially provided what Senator/Cannae have asked for by publicly releasing multi-year guidance to all of our shareholders, including: – Multi-year financial forecasts – Information about planned divestitures, including implied margin for the pro forma company – Further details into the ongoing diversification of our revenue mix § After Senator/Cannae threatened to solicit consents to call a special meeting, the CoreLogic Board proactively scheduled the Special Meeting to put this issue to a vote by all our shareholders § It is clear to us that Senator/Cannae’s recent $1 price increase was not a serious response to our request that they offer a price that ascribes appropriate value for CoreLogic shareholders before we provide detailed diligence to a close competitor ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 30Despite Senator/Cannae’s Best Efforts to Portray Otherwise, CoreLogic Has Engaged & Evaluated The Proposal in Good Faith § Members of our Board and management met with Senator/Cannae to understand their position on CoreLogic and whether we could address the value and certainty issues with the proposal – At their request, we discussed the value drivers behind our numbers that we have publicly disclosed – We also asked them questions about their proposal and to tell us about their committed sources of equity, which they refused to provide – Senator/Cannae, on the other hand, never engaged with CoreLogic about a potential transaction before launching their hostile proposal § Senator/Cannae continue to request further due diligence despite our release of multi-year forecasts and substantial detail for all shareholders – CoreLogic essentially provided what Senator/Cannae have asked for by publicly releasing multi-year guidance to all of our shareholders, including: – Multi-year financial forecasts – Information about planned divestitures, including implied margin for the pro forma company – Further details into the ongoing diversification of our revenue mix § After Senator/Cannae threatened to solicit consents to call a special meeting, the CoreLogic Board proactively scheduled the Special Meeting to put this issue to a vote by all our shareholders § It is clear to us that Senator/Cannae’s recent $1 price increase was not a serious response to our request that they offer a price that ascribes appropriate value for CoreLogic shareholders before we provide detailed diligence to a close competitor ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 30

ConclusionConclusion

Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Is Not in Shareholders’ Best Interests CoreLogic is a leading information services company delivering its strongest year ever in 2020, with line-of-sight to continued growth and profitability which should merit further valuation enhancements (1) (2) (1) § In 2020, our best year ever, we expect to deliver revenue growth of 14% , adjusted EBITDA growth of 25% and ~300bps of (2) (1) adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to 32% § In 2021, 2022 and beyond we expect ~5% organic growth, further margin expansion and continued shift in business mix beyond mortgage-dependent revenue § As additional quarters bear out the durability of our transformation, we expect the market will rerate our multiple to become more in line with the multiples of other leading information services providers Our Board believes Senator/Cannae’s proposal, by ignoring CoreLogic’s transformation, demonstrably robust earnings power, increased 2020 guidance and strong multi-year outlook, significantly undervalues CoreLogic (2) § Simply applying Senator/Cannae’s initial proposed 13.4x multiple to our increased 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance implies a value in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator / Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price based on our current FY 2020 guidance results in a price in the ~$67 - ~$69 range — without giving effect to any takeover premium, our increased long-term growth and margins or our significant share repurchase commitment § Accounting for our strong growth prospects, which are not reliant on mortgage cyclicality (~95% recurring revenue), should merit further valuation enhancements (3) § Research analysts have noted our potential for near-term multiple expansion – the lowest multiple among peers is 15.8x , and recent deals in the sector further justify a higher multiple CoreLogic’s Board is highly qualified to evaluate all strategic alternatives, including this proposal Unlike CoreLogic’s Board – which is committed to delivering value to shareholders by considering all viable pathways – it is our view that Senator/Cannae’s nominees, who were hand-picked by the group attempting to buy CoreLogic for the lowest possible price, lack the experience to evaluate all strategic alternatives PROTECT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT – A VOTE AGAINST REMOVAL OF THE CORELOGIC DIRECTORS IS IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS 1. 2020 forecast based on midpoint of guidance ranges; forecasts exclude impact of planned divestitures of existing businesses; 2019 adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non-core units), which have no 2020 counterpart 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. FactSet as of 9/18/20; based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 31Our Board has Determined That Senator/Cannae’s Proposal Is Not in Shareholders’ Best Interests CoreLogic is a leading information services company delivering its strongest year ever in 2020, with line-of-sight to continued growth and profitability which should merit further valuation enhancements (1) (2) (1) § In 2020, our best year ever, we expect to deliver revenue growth of 14% , adjusted EBITDA growth of 25% and ~300bps of (2) (1) adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to 32% § In 2021, 2022 and beyond we expect ~5% organic growth, further margin expansion and continued shift in business mix beyond mortgage-dependent revenue § As additional quarters bear out the durability of our transformation, we expect the market will rerate our multiple to become more in line with the multiples of other leading information services providers Our Board believes Senator/Cannae’s proposal, by ignoring CoreLogic’s transformation, demonstrably robust earnings power, increased 2020 guidance and strong multi-year outlook, significantly undervalues CoreLogic (2) § Simply applying Senator/Cannae’s initial proposed 13.4x multiple to our increased 2020 adjusted EBITDA guidance implies a value in the ~$83 - ~$85 range § At our forward multiple of ~11.3x, just before Senator / Cannae publicly announced their proposal, the implied stock price based on our current FY 2020 guidance results in a price in the ~$67 - ~$69 range — without giving effect to any takeover premium, our increased long-term growth and margins or our significant share repurchase commitment § Accounting for our strong growth prospects, which are not reliant on mortgage cyclicality (~95% recurring revenue), should merit further valuation enhancements (3) § Research analysts have noted our potential for near-term multiple expansion – the lowest multiple among peers is 15.8x , and recent deals in the sector further justify a higher multiple CoreLogic’s Board is highly qualified to evaluate all strategic alternatives, including this proposal Unlike CoreLogic’s Board – which is committed to delivering value to shareholders by considering all viable pathways – it is our view that Senator/Cannae’s nominees, who were hand-picked by the group attempting to buy CoreLogic for the lowest possible price, lack the experience to evaluate all strategic alternatives PROTECT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT – A VOTE AGAINST REMOVAL OF THE CORELOGIC DIRECTORS IS IN YOUR BEST INTERESTS 1. 2020 forecast based on midpoint of guidance ranges; forecasts exclude impact of planned divestitures of existing businesses; 2019 adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non-core units), which have no 2020 counterpart 2. For the definition of adjusted EBITDA, see Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures on page 1 3. FactSet as of 9/18/20; based on consensus estimates; 2019 revenue adjusted to exclude impact of previously announced business exits (AMC transformation and exit of non core units); peers include CoStar, Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, Experian, Fair Isaac, IHS Markit, RELX, Thomson Reuters, TransUnion, Verisk, Wolters Kluwer; lowest multiple of 15.8x based on Wolters Kluwer ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 31

AppendixAppendix

CoreLogic Consolidated Historical Results ( $ in m illions, unaudited) Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Net Incom e/( Loss) f rom Continuing $ 30.8 $ 64.8 $ 28.4 $ 58.5 $ 22.5 $ 13.0 $ 1.7 $ ( 5.5) $ 40.5 $ 30.1 $ 33.8 $ 59.0 Operations Income Taxes 1 1.7 (18.6) (0.6) 1 8.3 20.8 7.8 0.9 (14.9) 14.7 8 .7 1 3.1 22.0 Share-based Compensation 8.6 6 .3 8.7 1 1.1 9 .8 7 .6 9 .9 7 .9 9.1 9 .4 8 .1 1 3.8 Non-Operating Losses/(Gains) 2 3.5 (2.0) 0.9 (2.8) (1.4) (16.5) 2 .5 17.9 (1.2) 7.0 3 .3 (6.2) Efficiency Investments and other 1.1 0.0 0 .5 4 .7 6.6 9.2 1 3.0 1 2.6 6.4 7.6 5 .0 6 .7 Transaction Costs 1.0 2 .1 2 .0 2.6 2 .1 4 .6 1 .7 1 .9 1.7 1 .9 2.5 (2.5) Depreciation and Amortization 45.3 46.1 46.1 47.4 4 8.5 50.0 4 9.2 47.1 4 5.7 4 5.7 4 6.8 4 6.7 Impairment Loss - - - - - 7.6 - 4 7.8 0 .1 - - 1.2 Interest Expense 16.3 1 7.8 17.2 1 8.8 19.1 19.0 18.7 19.2 1 9.5 18.7 17.8 17.6 Amortization of Acquired Software (Equity 0.3 0 .2 0 .2 0.2 0 .2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - in earnings of Affliates) Adjusted EBITDA $ 138.7 $ 116.7 $ 103.4 $ 158.8 $ 128.3 $ 102.5 $ 97.8 $ 133.9 $ 136.6 $ 129.2 $ 130.4 $ 158.2 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 32CoreLogic Consolidated Historical Results ( $ in m illions, unaudited) Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Net Incom e/( Loss) f rom Continuing $ 30.8 $ 64.8 $ 28.4 $ 58.5 $ 22.5 $ 13.0 $ 1.7 $ ( 5.5) $ 40.5 $ 30.1 $ 33.8 $ 59.0 Operations Income Taxes 1 1.7 (18.6) (0.6) 1 8.3 20.8 7.8 0.9 (14.9) 14.7 8 .7 1 3.1 22.0 Share-based Compensation 8.6 6 .3 8.7 1 1.1 9 .8 7 .6 9 .9 7 .9 9.1 9 .4 8 .1 1 3.8 Non-Operating Losses/(Gains) 2 3.5 (2.0) 0.9 (2.8) (1.4) (16.5) 2 .5 17.9 (1.2) 7.0 3 .3 (6.2) Efficiency Investments and other 1.1 0.0 0 .5 4 .7 6.6 9.2 1 3.0 1 2.6 6.4 7.6 5 .0 6 .7 Transaction Costs 1.0 2 .1 2 .0 2.6 2 .1 4 .6 1 .7 1 .9 1.7 1 .9 2.5 (2.5) Depreciation and Amortization 45.3 46.1 46.1 47.4 4 8.5 50.0 4 9.2 47.1 4 5.7 4 5.7 4 6.8 4 6.7 Impairment Loss - - - - - 7.6 - 4 7.8 0 .1 - - 1.2 Interest Expense 16.3 1 7.8 17.2 1 8.8 19.1 19.0 18.7 19.2 1 9.5 18.7 17.8 17.6 Amortization of Acquired Software (Equity 0.3 0 .2 0 .2 0.2 0 .2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 - - in earnings of Affliates) Adjusted EBITDA $ 138.7 $ 116.7 $ 103.4 $ 158.8 $ 128.3 $ 102.5 $ 97.8 $ 133.9 $ 136.6 $ 129.2 $ 130.4 $ 158.2 ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 32

Reconciliation of Adjusted EPS Historical Results ( per share, unaudited) Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Net Incom e/( Loss) f rom Continuing $ 0.36 $ 0.78 $ 0.34 $ 0.71 $ 0.27 $ 0.16 $ 0.02 $ ( 0.07) $ 0.50 $ 0.37 $ 0.42 $ 0.73 Operations Share-based Compensation 0.10 0.08 0 .10 0 .13 0 .12 0.09 0 .12 0.10 0 .11 0 .12 0.10 0.17 Non-Operating Losses/(Gains) 0.28 (0.02) 0.01 (0.03) (0.02) (0.20) 0 .03 0 .22 (0.02) 0.09 0 .04 (0.08) Efficiency Investments and other 0.01 - 0.01 0.06 0 .08 0.11 0 .16 0 .15 0.08 0 .09 0.06 0 .08 Transaction Costs 0 .01 0 .02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0 .06 0 .02 0 .02 0.02 0 .02 0 .03 (0.03) Depreciation and Amortization 0 .21 0.22 0.22 0 .23 0 .24 0 .24 0 .24 0.23 0.21 0 .21 0.21 0 .21 Amortization of Acquired Software (Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - in earnings of Affliates) Impairment Loss - - - - - 0 .09 - 0 .59 - - - 0 .02 (1) Income Tax Effect (0.25) (0.53) (0.18) (0.13) - (0.07) (0.14) (0.45) (0.08) (0.13) (0.10) (0.08) Adjusted EPS $ 0.72 $ 0.55 $ 0.52 $ 1.00 $ 0.72 $ 0.48 $ 0.45 $ 0.79 $ 0.82 $ 0.77 $ 0.76 $ 1.02 1. Reflects the income tax effect on adjustments and the differential impact on assumed tax rate and effective tax rate. ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 33Reconciliation of Adjusted EPS Historical Results ( per share, unaudited) Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018 Q1 2019 Q2 2019 Q3 2019 Q4 2019 Q1 2020 Q2 2020 Net Incom e/( Loss) f rom Continuing $ 0.36 $ 0.78 $ 0.34 $ 0.71 $ 0.27 $ 0.16 $ 0.02 $ ( 0.07) $ 0.50 $ 0.37 $ 0.42 $ 0.73 Operations Share-based Compensation 0.10 0.08 0 .10 0 .13 0 .12 0.09 0 .12 0.10 0 .11 0 .12 0.10 0.17 Non-Operating Losses/(Gains) 0.28 (0.02) 0.01 (0.03) (0.02) (0.20) 0 .03 0 .22 (0.02) 0.09 0 .04 (0.08) Efficiency Investments and other 0.01 - 0.01 0.06 0 .08 0.11 0 .16 0 .15 0.08 0 .09 0.06 0 .08 Transaction Costs 0 .01 0 .02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0 .06 0 .02 0 .02 0.02 0 .02 0 .03 (0.03) Depreciation and Amortization 0 .21 0.22 0.22 0 .23 0 .24 0 .24 0 .24 0.23 0.21 0 .21 0.21 0 .21 Amortization of Acquired Software (Equity - - - - - - - - - - - - in earnings of Affliates) Impairment Loss - - - - - 0 .09 - 0 .59 - - - 0 .02 (1) Income Tax Effect (0.25) (0.53) (0.18) (0.13) - (0.07) (0.14) (0.45) (0.08) (0.13) (0.10) (0.08) Adjusted EPS $ 0.72 $ 0.55 $ 0.52 $ 1.00 $ 0.72 $ 0.48 $ 0.45 $ 0.79 $ 0.82 $ 0.77 $ 0.76 $ 1.02 1. Reflects the income tax effect on adjustments and the differential impact on assumed tax rate and effective tax rate. ©2020 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 33