FORM 6-K

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 1-15270

For the month of June 2020

NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

9-1, Nihonbashi 1-chome

Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8645

Japan

(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F      X             Form 40-F              

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):             

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):             

 

 

 

 

Information furnished on this form:

EXHIBIT

 

Exhibit Number
1.		(English Translation) Extraordinary Report Pursuant to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

		NOMURA HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: June 24, 2020		By:		/s/ Go Sugiyama
				Go Sugiyama
				Senior Managing Director

[Translation of the Extraordinary Report Filed with the Director General of the Kanto Finance Bureau on June 24, 2020]

1. Reason for Submission

Given that Resolutions were adopted at the 116th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 23, 2020, we hereby submit this Extraordinary Report under the provisions of Article 24-5, Paragraph 4 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act of Japan and Article 19, Paragraph 2, Item 9-2, of the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Disclosure of Corporate Information.

2. Matters Reported

 

(1)	Date on which meeting was held

June 23, 2020

 

(2)	Proposal acted upon

Proposal: Appointment of 10 Directors

Koji Nagai, Kentaro Okuda, Toshio Morita, Hisato Miyashita, Hiroshi Kimura, Kazuhiko Ishimura, Noriaki Shimazaki, Mari Sono, Michael Lim Choo San and Laura Simone Unger

 

(3)	Number of voting rights expressing an opinion for, against, or abstaining from, the proposal; requirements for the proposal to be approved; results of the resolutions

Proposal: Appointment of 10 Directors

 

Proposal		For				Against				Abstain				Result of the Resolutions
														Approval Ratio (%)				Approved/Rejected
Koji Nagai			18,354,095				1,178,783				1,187,960				88.3	%		Approved
Kentaro Okuda			19,335,626				197,262				1,187,958				93.0	%		Approved
Toshio Morita			17,947,999				1,584,903				1,187,944				86.3	%		Approved
Hisato Miyashita			18,514,064				1,018,816				1,187,960				89.1	%		Approved
Hiroshi Kimura			19,376,373				156,515				1,187,957				93.2	%		Approved
Kazuhiko Ishimura			19,331,820				201,060				1,187,965				93.0	%		Approved
Noriaki Shimazaki			19,311,562				221,319				1,187,965				92.9	%		Approved
Mari Sono			15,846,717				4,865,991				8,129				76.2	%		Approved
Michael Lim Choo San			19,386,704				146,183				1,187,958				93.3	%		Approved
Laura Simone Unger			19,431,322				101,565				1,187,958				93.5	%		Approved

Notes:

 

1.

The requirement for each resolution to be approved is as follows:

A vote in favor by a simple majority of the voting rights held by the shareholders present at a meeting attended by shareholders entitled to exercise voting rights holding in aggregate 1/3 or more of the total voting rights.

 

2.

The method for calculating the Approval Ratio is as follows:

This is the ratio of the total number of votes in favor exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting and those exercised by the shareholders present at the meeting that the Company was able to confirm an opinion for, to the total number of voting rights of the shareholders present at the meeting (the portion of the voting rights that were exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting, as well as those held by the shareholders present at the meeting).

 

(4)	The reason why a part of the voting rights expressing an opinion for, against, or abstaining from, the proposal that were exercised by shareholders present at the meeting were not included in the calculation:

By calculating the total number of voting rights exercised in advance by the day prior to the meeting and those exercised by the shareholders present at the meeting that the Company was able to confirm an opinion for or against the proposal, it was evident that, in conformance with the Companies Act, the requirement for the Proposal to be approved had been satisfied and the resolutions were duly adopted. Therefore, the number of voting rights held by the shareholders present at the meeting, which the Company was not able to confirm an opinion for, against, or abstaining from the proposals, were not included in the calculation.

End.