UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

FORM 20-F

 

 

  

(Mark One)

¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

 

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of event requiring this shell company report __________

 

Commission File Number 001-36588

 

 

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Republic of the Marshall Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

Wessex House, 5th Floor

45 Reid Street

Hamilton, HM 12 Bermuda

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

Steffen Føreid

Wessex House, 5th Floor

45 Reid Street

Hamilton, HM 12 Bermuda

Telephone: +479-755-7406

Facsimile: +479-755-7401

steffen.foreid@hoeghlng.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Trading Symbol(s)

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common units representing limited partner interests   HMLP   New York Stock Exchange
         
Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units representing limited partner interests   HMLP PRA   New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

 

 

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

 

33,286,284 common units representing limited partner interests

6,625,590 Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units representing limited partner interests

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No

 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨  Yes  x  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x Yes  ¨  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

x  Yes  ¨  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨ Accelerated filer   x Non-accelerated filer   ¨ Emerging Growth Company  ¨

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards+ provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨ 

 

+ The term "new or revised financial accounting standard" refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP   x International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the Other   ¨
  International Accounting Standards Board   ¨  

 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ¨    Item 17    ¨ Item 18

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  ¨  Yes  x  No

 

 

 

 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

INDEX TO FORM 20-F

 

Presentation of Information in this Report 4
Forward-Looking Statements 4
   
Part I   7
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 7
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 7
Item 3. Key Information 7
A. Selected Financial Data 7
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness 13
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds 13
D. Risk Factors 13
Item 4. Information on the Partnership 50
A. History and Development of the Partnership 50
B. Business Overview 51
C. Organizational Structure 93
D. Property, Plant and Equipment 93
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comment 93
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 94
A. Operating Results 104
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources 115
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc. 128
D. Trend Information 129
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements 129
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations 129
G. Safe Harbor 129
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 130
A. Directors and Senior Management 130
B. Compensation 132
C. Board Practices 134
D. Employees 135
E. Unit Ownership 135
Item 7. Major Unitholders and Related Party Transactions 136
A. Major Unitholders 136
B. Related Party Transactions 137
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel 148
Item 8. Financial Information 149
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information 149
B. Significant changes 151
Item 9. The Offer and Listing 152
A. Offer and Listing Details 152
B. Plan of Distribution 152
C. Markets 152
D. Selling Unitholders 152
E. Dilution 152
F. Expenses of the Issue 152
Item 10. Additional Information 152
A. Share Capital 152
B. Memorandum and Articles of Association 152
C. Material Contracts 153
D. Exchange Controls 157
E. Taxation 157
F. Dividends and Paying Agents 163

 

2

 

 

G. Statement by Experts 163
H. Documents on Display 163
I. Subsidiary Information 163
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 164
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities 165
     
Part II   166
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 166
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Securities Holders and Use of Proceeds 166
Item 15. Controls and Procedures 166
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 167
Item 16B. Code of Ethics 167
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 167
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 167
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 167
Item 16F. Change in Registrants’ Certifying Accountant 167
Item 16G. Corporate Governance 168
Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure 168
     
Part III   169
Item 17. Financial Statements 169
Item 18. Financial Statements 169
Item 19. Exhibits 169
     
SIGNATURE   175
Index to Financial Statements of Höegh LNG Partners LP F-1

 

3

 

 

PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT

 

This annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 (this “Annual Report”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Annual Report. Unless we otherwise specify, references in this Annual Report to “Höegh LNG Partners,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “the Partnership” refer to Höegh LNG Partners LP or any one or more of its subsidiaries, or to all such entities unless the context otherwise indicates. References in this Annual Report to “our general partner” refer to Höegh LNG GP LLC, the general partner of Höegh LNG Partners. References in this Annual Report to “our operating company” refer to Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Partnership. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh UK” refer to Hoegh LNG Services Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating company. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Lampung” refer to Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating company. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh FSRU III” refer to Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating company. References in this Annual Report to “PT Höegh” refer to PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Cyprus” refer to Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited including its wholly owned branch, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch (“Egypt Branch”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating company and the owner of the Höegh Gallant. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Colombia Holding” refer to Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating company. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh FSRU IV” refer to Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh Colombia Holding and the owner of the Höegh Grace. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Colombia” refer to Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S., a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh Colombia Holding. References in this Annual Report to our or the “joint ventures” refer to SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and/or SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., the joint ventures that own two of the vessels in our fleet, the Neptune and the Cape Ann, respectively. References in this Annual Report to “Global LNG Supply” refer to Global LNG Supply SA, and references to “Total Gas & Power” refer to Total Gas & Power Ltd., subsidiaries of Total S.A. (“Total”). References in this Annual Report to “PGN LNG” refer to PT PGN LNG Indonesia, a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk (“PGN”). References in this Annual Report to “SPEC” refer to Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P.

 

References in this Annual Report to “Höegh LNG” refer, depending on the context, to Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. and to any one or more of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, other than us. References in this Annual Report to “EgyptCo” refer to Höegh LNG Egypt LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh LNG Management” refer to Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Maritime Management” refer to Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Norway” refer to Höegh LNG AS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Asia” refer to Höegh LNG Asia Pte. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Höegh Shipping” refer to Höegh LNG Shipping Services Pte Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG. References in this Annual Report to “Leif Höegh UK” refer to Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking statements concerning future events and our operations, performance and financial condition. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “future,” “project,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” “plan,” “intend” or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to:

 

  · market conditions and trends for floating storage and regasification units (“FSRUs”) and liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) carriers, including hire rates, vessel valuations, technological advancements, market preferences and factors affecting supply and demand of LNG, LNG carriers, and FSRUs;

 

  · our distribution policy and ability to make cash distributions on our units or any increases in the quarterly distributions on our common units;

 

  · restrictions in our debt agreements and pursuant to local laws on our joint ventures' and our subsidiaries' ability to make distributions;

 

  · our ability to settle the boil-off claim for the joint ventures;

 

  · the entry by us into a new time charter for the Höegh Gallant with Höegh LNG (the “Subsequent Charter”);

 

  · the ability of Höegh LNG to meet its financial obligations to the Partnership pursuant to the Subsequent Charter and its guarantee and indemnification obligations, including in relation to the boil-off claim;

 

4

 

 

  · our ability to compete successfully for future chartering opportunities;

 

  · demand in the FSRU sector or the LNG shipping sector; including demand for our vessels;

 

  · our ability to purchase additional vessels from Höegh LNG in the future;

 

  · our ability to integrate and realize the anticipated benefits from acquisitions;

 

  · our anticipated growth strategies; including the acquisition of vessels;

 

  · our anticipated receipt of dividends and repayment of indebtedness from subsidiaries and joint ventures;

 

  · effects of volatility in global prices for crude oil and natural gas;

  

  · the effect of the worldwide economic environment;
 

 

·

 

the effects of outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, including the length and severity of the recent worldwide outbreak of Coronavirus COVID-19 (“Coronavirus”), including its impact on our business;

  

  · turmoil in the global financial markets;

 

  · fluctuations in currencies and interest rates;

 

  · general market conditions, including fluctuations in hire rates and vessel values;

 

  · changes in our operating expenses, including drydocking, on-water class surveys, insurance costs and bunker costs;

 

  · our ability to comply with financing agreements and the expected effect of restrictions and covenants in such agreements;

 

  · the financial condition liquidity and creditworthiness of our existing or future customers and their ability to satisfy their obligations under our contracts;

 

  · our ability to replace existing borrowings, make additional borrowings and to access public equity and debt capital markets;

 

  · planned capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund capital expenditures;

 

  · the exercise of purchase options by our customers;

 

  · our ability to perform under our contracts and maintain long-term relationships with our customers;

 

  · our ability to leverage Höegh LNG’s relationships and reputation in the shipping industry;

 

  · our continued ability to enter into long-term, fixed-rate charters and the hire rate thereof;

 

  · the operating performance of our vessels and any related claims by Total S.A. or other customers;

 

  · our ability to maximize the use of our vessels, including the redeployment or disposition of vessels no longer under long-term charters;

 

  · our ability to compete successfully for future chartering and newbuilding opportunities;

 

  · timely acceptance of our vessels by their charterers;

 

  · termination dates and extensions of charters;

 

  · the cost of, and our ability to comply with, governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards, as well as standard regulations imposed by our charterers applicable to our business;

 

  · the availability and cost of low sulfur fuel oil compliant with the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) sulfur emission limit reductions generally referred to as “IMO 2020” that took effect January 1, 2020 and, absent the installation of expensive scrubbers, reduced the maximum allowable sulfur content for fuel oil used in the marine sector, including our vessels, from 3.5% to 0.5%;

 

5

 

 

  · economic substance laws and regulations adopted or considered by various jurisdictions of formation or incorporation of us and certain of our subsidiaries;

 

  · availability and cost of skilled labor, vessel crews and management, including possible disruptions caused by the Coronavirus outbreak;

   

  · the number of offhire days and drydocking requirements, including our ability to complete scheduled drydocking on time and within budget;

 

  · our general and administrative expenses as a publicly traded limited partnership and our fees and expenses payable under our ship management agreements, the technical information and services agreement and the administrative services agreement;

 

  · the anticipated taxation of the Partnership, its subsidiaries and affiliates and distributions to its unitholders;

 

  · estimated future maintenance and replacement capital expenditures;

  

  · our ability to retain key employees;

 

  · customers’ increasing emphasis on environmental and safety concerns;

 

  · potential liability from any pending or future litigation;

 

  · risks inherent in the operation of our vessels including potential disruption due to accidents, political events, piracy or acts by terrorists;

 

  · future sales of our common units, Series A preferred units or other securities in the public market;

 

  · our business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations; and

 

  · our ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and effective disclosure controls and procedures.

 

Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report are made based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks discussed in “Item 3.D. Risk Factors.” The risks, uncertainties and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.

 

We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We make no prediction or statement about the performance of our common units. The various disclosures included in this Annual Report and in our other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, prospects and results of operations should be carefully reviewed and considered.

 

6

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 3. Key Information

 

  A. Selected Financial Data

 

The following table presents, in each case for the years and as of the dates indicated, our selected consolidated financial and operating data. Prior to the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”) on August 12, 2014, Höegh LNG contributed to the Partnership all of its equity interests in each of the entities that own the PGN FSRU Lampung and the joint ventures that own the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The transfer of these equity interests by Höegh LNG to the Partnership in connection with the IPO was recorded at Höegh LNG’s consolidated book values, as adjusted to US GAAP.

 

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our general partner has irrevocably delegated to our board of directors the power to oversee and direct the operations of, manage and determine the strategies and policies of the Partnership. Four of the seven board members were elected by the common unitholders at our first annual meeting of unitholders. As a result, Höegh LNG, as the owner of our general partner, does not have the power to control our board of directors or the Partnership, and we are not considered to be under the control of Höegh LNG for accounting purposes. As a consequence, we have accounted for acquisitions that are business combinations from Höegh LNG under the purchase method of accounting. Such historical acquisitions are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition and there has been no retroactive restatement of our financial statements to reflect the historical results of the entity acquired.

 

On October 1, 2015, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Höegh FSRU III, the entity that indirectly owns the Höegh Gallant (the "Höegh Gallant entities"). The results of operations of the Höegh Gallant are included in our results from the acquisition date. 

 

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Colombia Holding, the owner of the entities that own and operate the Höegh Grace (the "Höegh Grace entities"). The results of operations of the Höegh Grace are included in our earnings for the full year of 2017. The interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity.

 

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

Two of the vessels in our fleet (the Neptune and the Cape Ann) are owned by our joint ventures, each of which is owned 50% by us. Under applicable accounting guidance, we do not consolidate the financial results of these two joint ventures into our financial results. We account for our 50% equity interests in these two joint ventures as equity method investments in our consolidated financial statements. We derived cash flows from the operations of these two joint ventures from interest payments on our shareholder loans to our joint ventures.

 

We have two segments, which are the “Majority held FSRUs” and the “Joint venture FSRUs.” As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Majority held FSRUs included the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, Majority held FSRUs included the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Höegh Gallant. As of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, Joint venture FSRUs included two 50%-owned FSRUs, the Neptune and the Cape Ann.

 

7

 

 

We measure our segment profit based on segment EBITDA. Segment EBITDA is reconciled to net income for each segment in the segment table below. The accounting policies applied to the segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements, except that i) Joint venture FSRUs are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note in the consolidated financial statements and under equity accounting for the consolidated financial statements, ii) internal interest income and interest expense between the Partnership's subsidiaries that eliminate in consolidation are not included in the segment columns for the other financial income (expense), net line and iii) non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is subtracted in the segment note to reflect the Partnership’s interest in Segment EBITDA as the Partnership’s segment profit measure, Segment EBITDA. Under the proportional consolidation method, 50% of the Joint venture FSRUs’ revenues, expenses and assets are reflected in the segment reporting. Management monitors the results of operations of our joint ventures under the proportional consolidation method and not the equity method. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership began consolidating its acquired 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Since the Partnership obtained control of the Höegh Grace entities, it consolidates 100% of the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of the Höegh Grace entities and the interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity. Management monitored the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities based on the Partnership’s 51% interest in the Segment EBITDA of such entities and, therefore, subtracted the non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to present Segment EBITDA. The adjustment to non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is reversed to reconcile to operating income and net income in the segment presentation. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there is no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

You should read the following selected financial and operating data in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

8

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per unit  Year Ended December 31, 

information and fleet data)

  2019   2018   2017   2016   2015 
Statement of Income Data:                         
Time charter revenues  $145,321   $144,952   $143,531   $91,107   $57,465 
Other revenue   115    1,609             
Total revenues   145,436    146,561    143,531    91,107    57,465 
Vessel operating expenses   (30,870)   (24,195)   (23,791)   (16,080)   (9,679)
Construction contract expenses           (151)   (315)    
Administrative expenses   (9,861)   (8,916)   (9,910)   (9,718)   (8,733)
Depreciation and amortization   (21,477)   (21,146)   (21,054)   (10,552)   (2,653)
Total operating expenses   (62,208)   (54,257)   (54,906)   (36,665)   (21,065)
Equity in earnings of joint ventures   6,078    17,938    5,139    16,622    17,123 
Operating income (loss)   89,306    110,242    93,764    71,064    53,523 
Interest income   947    725    500    857    7,568 
Interest expense   (27,692)   (26,814)   (30,085)   (25,178)   (17,770)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   1,030                 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments       4,681    2,463    1,839    949 
Other items, net   (3,575)   (2,907)   (3,574)   (3,333)   (2,678)
Income (loss) before tax   60,016    85,927    63,068    45,249    41,592 
Income tax expense   (7,275)   (8,305)   (3,878)   (3,872)   (313)
Net income (loss)  $52,741   $77,622   $59,190   $41,377   $41,279 
Non-controlling interest in net income           10,408         
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income   13,850    12,303    2,480         
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $38,891   $65,319   $46,302   $41,377   $41,279 
Earnings per unit                         
Common unit public (Basic and diluted)  $1.12   $1.93   $1.37   $1.58   $1.56 
Common unit Höegh LNG (Basic and diluted)  $1.84   $2.03   $1.44   $1.52   $1.57 
Subordinated unit (Basic and diluted)  $0.70   $2.03   $1.45   $1.52   $1.57 
Cash distributions declared per unit  $1.76   $1.76   $1.72   $1.65   $1.43 
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):                         
Assets:                         
Cash and cash equivalents  $39,126   $26,326   $22,679   $18,915   $32,868 
Restricted cash   20,693    19,128    20,602    22,209    25,828 
Current portion of advances to joint ventures               6,275    7,130 
Accumulated earnings in joint ventures   3,270                 
Long term advances to joint ventures   3,831    3,536    3,263    943    6,861 
Net investment in financing lease   278,904    283,073    286,626    290,111    293,303 
Total assets   1,012,800    1,023,040    1,058,959    810,467    763,743 
Liabilities and equity:                         
Accumulated losses of joint ventures       2,808    20,746    25,886    42,507 
Amount, loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates   2,513    2,301    1,417    1,374    10,891 
Long term debt   412,301    390,087    434,845    300,440    330,635 
Revolving credit and seller’s credit due to owners and affiliates   8,792    39,292    51,832    43,005    47,000 
Total Partners' capital (excluding other comprehensive income (loss))   519,453    525,774    477,407    370,526    257,039 
Total liabilities and equity  $1,012,800   $1,023,040   $1,058,959   $810,467   $763,743 
Cash Flow Data:                         
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  $85,252   $91,681   $79,947   $36,599   $32,778 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (269)   3,067    (38,450)   (83,084)   15,455 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (70,625)   (92,478)   (39,340)   29,059    (56,234)
Fleet data                         
Number of vessels   5    5    5    4    4 
Average age (in years)   6.9    5.9    4.9    4.8    3.8 
Average charter length remaining excluding options (in years)   9.5    10.5    11.5    13.1    14.1 
Average charter length remaining including options (in years)   16.5    17.5    18.5    19.4    20.4 
Other Financial Data:                         
Segment EBITDA (1)  $138,094   $145,687   $112,156   $99,159   $72,258 
Capital expenditures                         
Expenditures for vessels and equipment  $269   $747   $21   $537   $955 
Selected Segment Data:                         
Joint venture FSRUs (proportionate consolidation) (2)                         
Segment Statement of Income Data:                         
Time charter revenues  $42,433   $43,169   $42,165   $43,272   $42,698 
Segment EBITDA (1)   33,389    32,237    21,687    34,165    33,205 
Operating income  $23,359   $22,512   $11,872   $24,640   $23,978 
Segment Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):                         
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation  $252,789   $261,614   $265,642   $274,932   $283,539 
Total assets  $284,174   $286,283   $287,562   $298,712   $303,390 
Segment Capital expenditures:                         
Expenditures for vessels and equipment  $1,108   $5,795   $524   $783   $13,095 

  

(1) Segment EBITDA is a Non-GAAP financial measure. Please read “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

(2) Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” below and note 4 of our consolidated financial statements for information on the basis of presentation for the Joint venture FSRUs segment.

 

9

 

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

Segment EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization and taxes. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization and impairment, taxes and other financial items less non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA. Other financial items consist of gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other items, net (including foreign exchange gains and losses and withholding tax on interest expenses and other). Segment EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and external users of financial statements, such as the Partnership's lenders, to assess its financial and operating performance. The Partnership believes that Segment EBITDA assists its management and investors by increasing the comparability of its performance from period to period and against the performance of other companies in the industry that provide Segment EBITDA information. This increased comparability is achieved by excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods or companies of interest, other financial items, depreciation, amortization and impairment and taxes, which items are affected by various and possibly changing financing methods, capital structure and historical cost basis and which items may significantly affect net income between periods. The Partnership believes that including Segment EBITDA as a financial and operating measure benefits investors in (a) selecting between investing in it and other investment alternatives and (b) monitoring its ongoing financial and operational strength in assessing whether to continue to hold common or preferred units. Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating income or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with US GAAP. Segment EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income, and these measures may vary among other companies. Therefore, Segment EBITDA as presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following tables reconcile Segment EBITDA for each of the segments and the Partnership as a whole to net income (loss), the comparable US GAAP financial measure, for the periods presented: 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2019 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment       Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Reconciliation to net income (loss)                              
Net income (loss)  $70,934    6,078    (24,271)   52,741        $52,741(3)
Interest income   (449)   (415)   (498)   (1,362)   415  (4)   (947)
Interest expense   9,582    12,485    18,110    40,177    (12,485) (4)   27,692 
Depreciation, amortization and impairment   21,477    10,030        31,507    (10,030) (5)   21,477 
Other financial items (2)   2,348    5,211    197    7,756    (5,211) (6)   2,545 
Income tax (benefit) expense   7,278        (3)   7,275         7,275 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Interest (income) expense, net                   12,070  (4)   12,070 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Depreciation and amortization                   10,030  (5)   10,030 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Other financial items (2)                   5,211  (6)   5,211 
Segment EBITDA  $111,170    33,389    (6,465)   138,094        $138,094 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2018 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment       Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Reconciliation to net income (loss)                              
Net income (loss)  $68,168    17,938    (8,484)   77,622        $77,622(3)
Interest income   (305)   (234)   (420)   (959)   234  (4)   (725)
Interest expense   23,875    13,270    2,939    40,084    (13,270) (4)   26,814 
Depreciation and amortization   21,146    9,725        30,871    (9,725) (5)   21,146 
Other financial items (2)   (1,870)   (8,462)   96    (10,236)   8,462  (6)   (1,774)
Income tax (benefit) expense   8,253        52    8,305         8,305 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Interest (income) expense, net                   13,036  (4)   13,036 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Depreciation and amortization                   9,725  (5)   9,725 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Other financial items (2)                   (8,462) (6)   (8,462)
Segment EBITDA  $119,267    32,237    (5,817)   145,687        $145,687 

 

10

 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2017 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment       Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Reconciliation to net income (loss)                              
Net income (loss)  $63,628    5,139    (9,577)   59,190        $59,190(3)
Interest income   (18)   (76)   (482)   (576)   76  (4)   (500)
Interest expense   26,151    13,983    3,934    44,068    (13,983) (4)   30,085 
Depreciation and amortization   21,054    9,815        30,869    (9,815) (5)   21,054 
Other financial items (2)   1,060    (7,174)   51    (6,063)   7,174  (6)   1,111 
Income tax (benefit) expense   3,893        (15)   3,878         3,878 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Interest (income) expense, net                   13,907  (4)   13,907 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Depreciation and amortization                   9,815  (5)   9,815 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Other financial items (2)                   (7,174) (6)   (7,174)
Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA   (19,210)           (19,210)        (19,210)
Segment EBITDA  $96,558    21,687    (6,089)   112,156        $112,156 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2016 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment       Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Reconciliation to net income (loss)                              
Net income (loss)  $35,803    16,622    (11,048)   41,377        $41,377(3)
Interest income       (2)   (857)   (859)   2  (4)   (857)
Interest expense   20,107    15,094    5,071    40,272    (15,094) (4)   25,178 
Depreciation and amortization   10,552    9,525        20,077    (9,525) (5)   10,552 
Other financial items (2)   1,435    (7,074)   59    (5,580)   7,074  (6)   1,494 
Income tax (benefit) expense   3,852        20    3,872         3,872 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Interest (income) expense, net                   15,092  (4)   15,092 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Depreciation and amortization                   9,525  (5)   9,525 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Other financial items (2)                   (7,074) (6)   (7,074)
Segment EBITDA  $71,749    34,165    (6,755)   99,159        $99,159 

 

11

 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2015 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment       Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Reconciliation to net income (loss)                              
Net income (loss)  $24,807    17,123    (651)   41,279        $41,279(3)
Interest income           (7,568)   (7,568)     (4)   (7,568)
Interest expense   15,617    16,113    2,153    33,883    (16,113) (4)   17,770 
Depreciation and amortization   2,653    9,227        11,880    (9,227) (5)   2,653 
Other financial items (2)   1,709    (9,257)   20    (7,528)   9,257  (6)   1,729 
Income tax (benefit) expense   333        (20)   313         313 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Interest (income) expense, net                   16,113  (4)   16,113 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Depreciation and amortization                   9,227  (5)   9,227 
Equity in earnings of JVs:                              
Other financial items (2)                   (9,257) (6)   (9,257)
Segment EBITDA  $45,119    33,205    (6,066)   72,258        $72,258 

 

(1)Eliminations reverse each of the income statement reconciling line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs that are reflected in the consolidated net income for the Partnership's share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) on the Equity in earnings (loss) of joint ventures line item in the consolidated income statement. Separate adjustments from the consolidated net income to Segment EBITDA for the Partnership's share of the Joint venture FSRUs are included in the reconciliation lines starting with “Equity in earnings of JVs.

 

(2)Other financial items consist of gain and loss on debt extinguishment, gains and losses on derivative instruments and other items, net including foreign exchange gains or losses and withholding tax on interest expense.

 

(3)There is no adjustment between net income for Total Segment reporting and the Consolidated reporting because the net income under the proportional consolidation and equity method of accounting is the same.

 

(4)Interest income and interest expense for the Joint venture FSRUs is eliminated from the Total Segment reporting to agree to the interest income and interest expense in the Consolidated reporting and reflected as a separate adjustment to the equity accounting on the line Equity in earnings of JVs: Interest (income) expense for the Consolidated reporting.

 

(5)Depreciation and amortization for the Joint venture FSRUs is eliminated from the Total Segment reporting to agree to the depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated reporting and reflected as a separate adjustment to the equity accounting on the line Equity in earnings of JVs: Depreciation and amortization for the Consolidated reporting.

 

(6)Other financial items for the Joint venture FSRUs is eliminated from the Segment reporting to agree to the Other financial items in the Consolidated reporting and reflected as a separate adjustment to the equity accounting on the line Equity in earnings of JVs: Other financial items for the Consolidated reporting.

 

12

 

 

  B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

 

Not applicable.

 

  C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable.

 

  D. Risk Factors

 

Some of the following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate and to our business in general. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and to ownership of our common units. The occurrence of any of the events described in this section could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash available for distribution or the trading price of our preferred and common units.

 

Risks Inherent in Our Business

 

Our fleet consists of five vessels as of March 31, 2020. Any limitation on the availability or operation of those vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could significantly reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

 

Our fleet consists of five vessels. If any of these vessels is unable to generate revenues as a result of off-hire time, early termination of the applicable time charter, purchase of the vessel by the charterer or otherwise, our financial condition and ability to make distributions to unitholders could be materially and adversely affected.

 

The charters relating to our vessels permit the charterer to terminate the charter in the event that the vessel is off-hire for any extended period. The charters also allow the charterer to terminate the charter upon the occurrence of specified defaults by us or in certain other cases, including termination without cause, due to force majeure or disruptions caused by war. Furthermore, PGN LNG was granted an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung at specified prices commencing in June 2018 and SPEC has the option to purchase the Höegh Grace in year 10, year 15 and year 20 of its charter. The termination of any of our charters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could significantly reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. For further details regarding termination of our charters, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Neptune Time Charter—Termination,” “— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter—Termination and —Purchase Option,” “—Höegh Gallant Time Charter—Termination,” “— Höegh Grace Charter—Term and Termination and —Purchase Option.” We may be unable to charter the applicable vessel, or replacement vessel, on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated charter.

 

We are dependent on Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG and SPEC as the sole customers for our vessels. A deterioration of the financial viability of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or our relationship with Total Gas & Power Global LNG Supply, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or the loss of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC as a customer, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG’s subsidiary, EgyptCo, and SPEC accounted for all of the revenues in our consolidated income statement. For each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, Global LNG Supply accounted for all of the revenues of our joint ventures from which we derived all of our equity in earnings of joint ventures. Our joint ventures’ time charters were novated from Global LNG Supply to Total Gas & Power in February 2020. A deterioration in the financial viability of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or the loss of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC as a customer, or a decline in payments under any of the related charters, would have a greater adverse effect on us than for a company with a more diverse customer base, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

We or our joint ventures could lose a customer or the benefits of a charter as a result of a breach by the customer of a charter or other unanticipated developments, such as:

 

  · the customer failing to make charter payments or reducing charter payments because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or our joint venture partners or otherwise;

 

  · the insolvency, bankruptcy or liquidation of a customer or termination of the charter as a result thereof;

 

  · the customer exercising its right to terminate the charter in certain circumstances, such as: (i) defaults of our or our joint ventures’ obligations under the applicable charter, including breaches of performance standards or prolonged periods of off-hire; (ii) with respect to the Neptune, the Cape Ann and the Höegh Gallant, in the event of war that would materially interrupt the performance of the time charter; or (iii) with respect to the PGN FSRU Lampung, in the event of specified types of force majeure;

 

  · the charter terminating automatically if the vessel is lost or deemed a constructive loss;

 

  · with respect to the Höegh Gallant, the inability of Höegh LNG to perform under the Subsequent Charter following the exercise of our option on February 27, 2020 to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant at the expiration of the current Höegh Gallant time charter; see “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Acquisition of the Höegh Gallant ”;

 

  · with respect to the PGN FSRU Lampung or the Höegh Grace, the charterer exercising its option to purchase the vessel; or

 

  · a prolonged force majeure event that materially interrupts the performance of the time charter.

 

13

 

 

If any charter is terminated, we or our joint ventures, as applicable, may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable as the current charters or at all. In addition, any termination fee payable to us may not adequately compensate us for the loss of the charter. Furthermore, if there was a premature termination of our joint venture charters that does not result in termination fees, it would result in mandatory repayments of the outstanding balances under the loan facilities for the Neptune and the Cape Ann.

 

In September 2017, the charterer of the Neptune and the Cape Ann made a performance claim to the joint ventures that own the vessels. This claim could reduce charter payments to such joint ventures. As a precaution, such joint ventures have suspended payments under the shareholder loans. Our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders depends on the performance of our joint ventures, subsidiaries and other investments. If we do not receive cash distributions or repayments under loan agreements from our joint ventures or if they are not sufficient, we will not be able to make cash distributions to unitholders unless we obtain funds from other sources. We may not be able to obtain the necessary funds from other sources on terms acceptable to us. Please read “Settlement of the boil-off performance claims is expected to reduce our joint ventures' ability to distribute cash to us.”

 

Any event, whether in our industry or otherwise, that adversely affects a customer’s financial condition, leverage, results of operations, cash flows or demand for our services may adversely affect our ability to sustain or increase cash distributions to our unitholders. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of our customers, including their level of indebtedness and the economic conditions and government policies in their areas of operation. Further, not all of our charters have parent company guarantees. For example, Total Gas & Power’s obligations under the Neptune and the Cape Ann charters are not guaranteed by its parent, Total.

 

The ability of each of our customers to perform its obligations under its applicable charter depends on its future financial condition and economic performance, which, in turn, will depend on prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond its control.

 

Höegh LNG has financial obligations to us pursuant to the Subsequent Charter and its guarantee and indemnification obligations, including those related to the boil-off claim. The inability of Höegh LNG to meet its financial obligations to us would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

Pursuant to an option agreement, we had the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025, at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, we exercised our option pursuant to the option agreement and we intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the signature date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims. We will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for our 50% share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement.

 

Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to us under the Subsequent Charter and for the indemnification related to the boil-off claim may be affected by events beyond either of the control of Höegh LNG or us, including opportunities to obtain new employment for the vessel, and prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, Höegh LNG’s ability to meet its obligations to us may be impaired. If Höegh LNG is unable to meet its obligations to us under the Subsequent Charter, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders could be materially adversely affected. 

  

 14 

 

Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we will face substantial competition.

 

One of our principal objectives is to enter into additional long-term charters for FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets. The process of obtaining long-term charters for FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets is competitive and generally involves an intensive screening process and competitive bids, and then often extends for several months. We believe FSRU and LNG carriers time charters are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to the vessel operator, including:

 

  · FSRU or LNG carrier experience and quality of ship operations;

 

  · quality of vessels;

 

  · cost effectiveness;

 

  · shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer service and safety;

 

  · technical ability and reputation for operation of highly specialized vessels;

 

  · quality and experience of seafaring crew;

 

  · safety record;

 

  · the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and financial stability generally;

 

  · relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable berths;

 

  · construction management experience, including the ability to obtain on-time delivery of new FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets according to customer specifications;

 

  · willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure events; and

 

  · competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.

 

15

 

 

We face substantial competition for providing floating storage and regasification services and marine transportation services for potential LNG projects from a number of experienced companies, including state-sponsored entities and major energy companies. As the FSRU market continues to grow and mature there are new competitors entering the market. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial resources and larger fleets than we do or Höegh LNG. In particular, expectations of rapid growth in the FSRU market has given owners the confidence to place orders for FSRUs before securing charters. This has led to more competition for mid- and long-term FSRU charters. We anticipate that an increasing number of marine transportation companies—including many with strong reputations and extensive resources and experience—will enter the FSRU or LNG carrier markets. This increased competition has already and may in the future cause greater price competition for time charters. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to expand our relationships with existing customers or to obtain new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

We may not be able to redeploy our FSRUs on terms as favorable as our or our joint venture’s current FSRU time charters or at all.

 

Due to increased competition and the limitations on demand for FSRUs, in the event that any of the time charters on our vessels are terminated, we may be unable to recharter such vessel as an FSRU. While we may be able to employ such vessel as a traditional LNG carrier, the hire rates and/or other charter terms may not be as favorable to us as those in the existing time charter. If we acquire additional FSRUs and they are not, as a result of time charter termination or otherwise, subject to a long-term, profitable time charter, we may be required to bid for projects at unattractive rates in order to reduce our losses relating to the vessels.

 

Requirements for some new LNG projects continue to be provided on a long-term basis, though the use of medium term charters of up to five years has increased in recent years. More frequent changes to vessel sizes and propulsion technology together with an increasing desire by charterers to access modern vessels could also reduce the appetite of charterers to commit to long-term charters that match their full requirement period, or to exercise options to extend their current charters. As a result, the duration of long-term charters could also decrease over time. We may also face increased difficulty entering into long-term time charters upon the expiration or early termination of our existing charters or of charters for any vessels that we acquire in the future. If as a result we contract our vessels on shorter term contracts, our earnings from these vessels are likely to become more volatile.

 

Hire rates for FSRUs may fluctuate substantially. If rates are lower when we are seeking a new charter, our earnings and ability to make distributions to our unitholders may decline.

 

Hire rates for FSRUs fluctuate over time as a result of changes in the supply-demand balance relating to current and future vessel supply. This supply-demand relationship largely depends on a number of factors outside our control. For example, driven in part by an increase in LNG production capacity, the market supply of FSRUs has been increasing as a result of the construction of new vessels before FSRU projects have matured to the point of entering FSRU contracts. The increase in supply has resulted in increased competition for FSRU contracts resulting in lower FSRU prices for recent contracts awarded. As of December 31, 2019, the FSRU order book totaled 7 vessels and the delivered FSRU fleet stood at 35 vessels. We believe any future expansion of the FSRU fleet may have a negative impact on charter hire rates, vessel utilization and vessel values, which impact could be amplified if the expansion of LNG production capacity or the approval of FSRU projects does not keep pace with the growth of the global fleet. The LNG market is also closely connected to world natural gas prices and energy markets, which we cannot predict. An extended decline in natural gas prices that leads to reduced investment in new liquefaction facilities could adversely affect our ability to re-charter our vessels at acceptable rates or to acquire and profitably operate new FSRUs. Accordingly, this could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

 

Fluctuations in overall LNG supply and demand growth could adversely affect our ability to secure future long-term charters.

 

Demand for LNG depends on a number of factors, including economic growth, the cost effectiveness of LNG compared to alternative fuels, environmental policy and the perceived need to diversify fuel mix for energy security reasons. The cost effectiveness of LNG compared to alternative fuels is also dependent on supply. A change in any of the factors influencing LNG demand, or an imbalance between supply and demand, could adversely affect the need for LNG infrastructure and our ability to secure additional long-term charters. Due in part to the Coronavirus outbreak, there has been a recent decline in natural gas and LNG prices. Volatility in natural gas prices globally may limit the willingness and ability of developers of new LNG infrastructure projects to approve the development of such new projects. Delayed development decisions may materially adversely affect our growth prospects and results of operations.

 

 16 

 

Outbreaks of epidemic and pandemic diseases and governmental responses thereto could adversely affect our business.

 

Our operations are subject to risks related to outbreaks of infectious diseases. In December 2019, the Coronavirus, a virus causing potentially deadly respiratory tract infections was first reported in Wuhan, China. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the Coronavirus to constitute a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” and subsequently, on March 11, 2020, declared the Coronavirus to be a “Pandemic”. Many countries have declared a state of emergency due to the outbreak. The outbreak has negatively affected economic conditions, energy prices and the demand for LNG and LNG shipping regionally as well as globally and may otherwise impact our operations and the operations of our customers and suppliers. Governments in affected countries are imposing travel bans, quarantines and other emergency public health measures. Those measures, though temporary in nature, may continue and increase depending on developments in the virus’ outbreak. As a result of these measures, our vessels may not be able to call on ports or may be restricted from embarking and disembarking from ports, located in regions affected by Coronavirus.

 

Although our operations have not been affected by the Coronavirus outbreak to date, the ultimate length and severity of the Coronavirus outbreak is uncertain at this time and therefore we cannot predict the impact it may have on our future operations, which could be material and adverse. We believe our primary risk and exposure related to uncertainty of cash flows from our long-term time charter contracts is due to the credit risk associated with the individual charterers. Payments are due under time charter contracts regardless of the demand for the charterers’ gas output or the utilization of the FSRU. It is therefore possible that charterers may not make payments for time charter invoices in times of reduced demand. Furthermore, should there be an outbreak of the Coronavirus on board one of our FSRUs or an inability to replace critical supplies or replacement parts due to disruptions to third-party suppliers, adequate crewing or supplies may not be available to fulfill our obligations under our time charter contracts. This could result in off-hire or warranty payments under performance guarantees which would reduce revenues for the impacted period. In addition, if financial institutions providing our interest rate swaps or lenders under our revolving credit facility are unable to meet their obligations, we could experience higher interest expense or be unable to obtain funding. If our charterers or lenders are unable to meet their obligations to us under their respective contracts or if we are unable to fulfill our obligations under our time charter contracts, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders could be materially adversely affected. We do not have long-term debt maturing in the next twelve months. However, the Lampung facility must be refinanced in 2021. Should we be unable to obtain refinancing for the Lampung facility in 2021, we may not have sufficient funds or other assets to satisfy all of our obligations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

In addition, trading prices of our units have recently declined significantly and may continue to decline due in part to the impact of the Coronavirus. Failure to control the continued spread of the Coronavirus could significantly impact economic activity and demand for our vessels, which could further negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash available for distribution and could result in further declines in our unit price.

 

17

 

 

PGN LNG and SPEC have options to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung and Höegh Grace, respectively. If either charterer exercises its option, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flows and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

PGN LNG currently has the option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung on June 1st of each year, at a price specified in the time charter. SPEC also has the option to purchase the Höegh Grace at a price specified in the Höegh Grace charter in year 10, year 15 and year 20 of such charter. Any compensation we receive for the purchase of the PGN FSRU Lampung or the Höegh Grace may not adequately compensate us for both the loss of the applicable vessel and related time charter. If either charterer exercises its option, it would significantly reduce the size of our fleet, and we may be unable to identify or acquire suitable replacement vessel(s) with the proceeds of the option exercise because, among other things that are beyond our control, there may be no replacement vessel(s) that are readily available for purchase at a price that is equal to or less than the proceeds from the option exercise and on terms acceptable to us. Even if we find suitable replacement vessel(s), the hire rate(s) of such vessel(s) may be significantly lower than the hire rate under the current time charters. Our inability to find suitable replacement vessel(s) or the chartering of replacement vessel(s) at lower hire rate(s) would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter—Purchase Option” and “—Vessel Time Charters— Höegh Grace Charter—Purchase Option.”

 

We are exposed to tax risks associated with doing business in different countries, including in emerging market countries.

 

We conduct all of our operations outside of the United States and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Some of the countries in which we are engaged in business or where our vessels are registered, for example, Indonesia, Colombia and starting in 2020, India, have historically less developed and less stable tax regimes than the United States. We are affected by tax regulations in those countries with respect to withholding taxes, value added taxes, payroll taxes, property taxes, taxes on certain financial transactions and corporate income taxes. Tax regulations, guidance and interpretation in these countries may not always be clear and may not contemplate floating infrastructure activities, such as FSRUs. In addition, such regulations may be subject to alternative interpretations or changes in interpretations over time, including as a result of audits by the local tax authorities. In this regard, our Indonesian subsidiary is subject to examination by the Indonesian tax authorities for up to five years following the completion of a fiscal year, and our subsidiaries in Singapore and Colombia are subject to examination by tax authorities for up to four years and three years, following the completion of a fiscal year or from the date of the tax return, respectively. As a result of a tax audit in Indonesia for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, certain additional withholding tax amounts were paid by our Indonesian subsidiary and downward adjustments were made to the amount of our Indonesian subsidiary’s tax loss carryforwards. As a result of new regulations related to property taxes in Indonesia for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, retroactive property tax and penalties were assessed for the years from 2015 to 2019. To the extent that future adjustments result in material additional tax liabilities being imposed on our subsidiaries, this would adversely impact our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Please read “Item 5.D. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Trend Information” and note 18 under “Indonesian corporate income tax” and “Indonesian property tax” to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Due to our lack of diversification, adverse developments in our LNG transportation, storage and regasification businesses could reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

We rely exclusively on the cash flows generated from our FSRUs. Due to our lack of diversification, an adverse development in the LNG transportation, storage and regasification industry could have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse assets or lines of business.

 

We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses to enable us to pay quarterly distribution on our Series A preferred units or the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units.

 

We may not have sufficient cash from operations to pay the quarterly distributions on our Series A preferred units or our common units. The amount of cash we can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate from our operations. We generate cash from our operations and through distributions from our joint ventures, and as such our cash from operations is dependent on our operations and the cash distributions and operations of our joint ventures, each of which may fluctuate based on the risks described herein, including, among other things:

 

  · the hire rates we and our joint ventures obtain from charters;

 

  · the level of operating costs and other expenses, such as the cost of crews, insurance, performance guarantees and liquidated damages;

 

  · demand for LNG;

 

  · supply and capacities of FSRUs and LNG carriers;

 

18

 

 

  · prevailing global and regional economic and political conditions;

 

  · currency exchange rate fluctuations;

 

  · interest rate fluctuations; and

 

  · the effect of governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards on the conduct of our business.

  

In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available for distribution on our units will depend on other factors, including:

 

  · the level of capital expenditures we and our joint ventures make, including for maintaining or replacing vessels, building new vessels, acquiring existing vessels and complying with regulations;

  

  · the number of off-hire or reduced-hire days for our fleet and the timing of, and number of days required for, scheduled drydocking of our vessels;

  

  · our and our joint ventures’ debt service requirements, minimum free liquid asset requirements under debt covenants, and restrictions on distributions contained in our and our joint ventures’ current and future debt instruments;

 

  · fluctuations in interest rates;

 

  · fluctuations in working capital needs;

 

  · variable corporate income tax rates, payroll taxes, value added taxes and withholding taxes and to the extent applicable, the ability to recover under charters;

 

  · our ability to make, and the level of, working capital borrowings; and

 

  · the amount of any cash reserves established by our board of directors.

 

In addition, each quarter we are required by our partnership agreement to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted. Our ability to pay distributions will also be limited to the extent that we have sufficient cash after establishment of cash reserves.

 

The amount of cash we generate from our operations and the cash distributions received from our joint ventures may differ materially from our or their profit or loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items. As a result of this and the other factors mentioned above, we may make cash distributions during periods when we record losses and may not make cash distributions during periods when we record net income.

 

At present, we only have two sources of available working capital borrowings that can be used to fund our general partnership purposes, including working capital and distributions: the $63 million revolving credit tranche under our $385 million facility and the $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG. Höegh LNG’s ability to make loans under the revolving credit facility may be affected by events beyond its and our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our and their ability to comply with the terms of the revolving credit facility may be impaired. If we request a borrowing under the revolving credit facility, Höegh LNG may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make loans under the revolving credit facility. In the event that Höegh LNG is unable to make loans to us pursuant to the revolving credit facility, or a default or other circumstance prohibits us from borrowing loans thereunder our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders could be materially adversely affected.

 

Our ability to grow and to meet our financial needs may be adversely affected by our cash distribution policy.

 

Our cash distribution policy, which is consistent with our partnership agreement, requires us to pay the distribution on our Series A preferred units, which rank senior to our common units, and then distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) to our common units each quarter. Accordingly, our growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations.

 

19

 

 

In determining the amount of cash available for distribution, our board of directors approves the amount of cash reserves to set aside, including reserves for future maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, working capital and other matters. We may also rely upon external financing sources, including commercial borrowings, to fund our capital expenditures. Accordingly, to the extent we do not have sufficient cash reserves or are unable to obtain financing, our cash distribution policy may significantly impair our ability to meet our financial needs or to grow.

 

Settlement of the boil-off performance claims is expected to reduce our joint ventures' ability to distribute cash to us.

 

Pursuant to their charters with Global LNG Supply, which were novated to Total Gas and Power in February 2020, the joint ventures ensure that the Neptune and the Cape Ann meet certain performance standards. The performance standards under each charter require that the vessel not exceed a maximum average daily boil-off of LNG, subject to certain contractual exclusions. Pursuant to the charters, the hire rate is subject to reduction by charterer in the event of failure to satisfy the performance standards. The charterer requested that the joint ventures calculate and present the boil-off since the beginning of the time charters, compared with the maximum average daily boil-off allowed under the charters. The charters for the Neptune and Cape Ann started in 2009 and 2010, respectively. On September 8, 2017, the charterer notified the joint ventures that it was formally making a claim for compensation in accordance with the provisions of the charters for a stated quantity of LNG exceeding the maximum average daily boil-off since the beginning of the charters.

 

As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures determined the liability associated with the boil-off claim was probable and could be reasonably estimated resulting in a total accrual of $23.7 million, which was recorded as a reduction of time charter revenues. The Partnership's 50% share of the accrual as of September 30, 2017 was approximately $11.9 million. As a precaution, the joint ventures suspended payments on their shareholder loans as of September 30, 2017 pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. As of December 31, 2017, the accrual was unchanged. The charterer and the joint ventures referred the claim to arbitration. The charterer's claim as submitted in the arbitration request was a gross amount of $52 million, covering the time period for the first performance period as defined in the time charters, and interest and expenses. Subsequently, the charterer and the joint ventures asked the arbitration tribunal for a partial determination on certain key contractual interpretations and the proceedings commenced in November 2018. In March 2019, the tribunal’s determination was received. The determination did not cover all the questions of contractual interpretation on which there is disagreement between the parties. On the questions that the tribunal was asked to determine, certain issues were determined in favor of the charterer and one issue was determined in favor of the joint ventures. With the exception of one issue, the tribunal’s conclusions on the contractual interpretations were unambiguous. For the remaining issue related to the calculation of a deduction from the gross claim, the tribunal did not specify how the deduction should be determined. As a result, there was significant uncertainty in the evaluation of the potential outcome of the boil-off claim. The joint ventures concluded the existing accrual continued to represent their best estimate of the probable liability as of December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2018.

 

On June 14, 2019, the charterer served an updated claim submission for approximately $54 million to the tribunal, incorporating claims for the second performance period and certain other claims. The owners did not agree with the charterer's claims or its interpretation of the deduction to the gross claim in accordance with the tribunal's determination. The joint ventures assessed the additional information available and updated the estimates for the potential range of outcomes for the periods ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019. As of each of these dates, the joint ventures concluded the recorded accrual continued to be the best estimate within the range. The parties have continued discussions with the objective of reaching a negotiated solution to settle the boil-off claim. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the signature date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims.

 

The joint ventures expect to pay the boil-off settlement with accumulated cash and certain restricted cash balances on the joint ventures respective balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and with cash flows from operations in 2020. The settlement of the claim will be prioritized over the payment of the shareholder loans. The suspension of the payments of the shareholder loans reduces cash flows available to us. Our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders depends on the performance of our joint ventures, subsidiaries and other investments. If we do not receive cash distributions or repayments under loan agreements from our joint ventures or if they are not sufficient, we will not be able to make cash distributions to unitholders unless we obtain funds from other sources. We may not be able to obtain the necessary funds from other sources on terms acceptable to us. The Partnership will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for its share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement. The remaining costs to be incurred for the technical modifications of the vessels are estimated to be $0.8 million, of which the Partnership’s 50% share would be $0.4 million. Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for the Partnership’s share of such costs.

 

20

 

 

We are a holding entity that has historically derived a portion of our income from equity interests in our joint ventures. Neither we nor our joint venture partners exercise affirmative control over our joint ventures. Accordingly, we cannot require our joint ventures to act in our best interests. Furthermore, our joint venture partners may prevent our joint ventures from taking action that may otherwise be beneficial to us, including making cash distributions to us. A deadlock between us and our joint venture partners could result in our exchanging equity interests in one of our joint ventures for the equity interests in our other joint venture held by our joint venture counterparties or in us or our joint venture partner selling shares in a joint venture to a third party.

 

We are a holding entity and conduct our operations and businesses through subsidiaries. We have historically derived a portion of our income from our 50% equity interests in our joint ventures that own the Neptune and the Cape Ann. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements” for a description of the shareholders’ agreement governing our joint ventures. Our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders will depend on the performance of our joint ventures, subsidiaries and other investments. If our joint venture partners do not approve cash distributions or if they are not sufficient, we will not be able to make cash distributions unless we obtain funds from other sources. We may not be able to obtain the necessary funds from other sources on terms acceptable to us. The approval of a majority of the members of the board of directors is required to consent to any proposed action by such joint ventures and, as a result, we will be unable to cause our joint venture to act in our best interests over the objection of our joint venture partners or make cash distributions to us. Our inability to require our joint ventures to act in our best interests may cause us to fail to realize expected benefits from our equity interests and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

Our joint venture partners for our joint ventures that own the Neptune and the Cape Ann are Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd (“MOL”) and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd (“TLT”), whom we refer to in this Annual Report as our joint venture partners. These entities together exercise one half of the voting power on the board of directors of each joint venture. As such, our joint venture partners may prevent our joint ventures from making cash distributions to us or may act in a manner that would otherwise not be in our best interests.

 

If the directors nominated by us and our joint venture partner are unable to reach agreement on any decision or action, then the issue will be resolved in accordance with the procedures set forth in the shareholders’ agreement. After the board of directors has met a second time to consider the decision or action, if the deadlock persists, one or more of our senior executives will meet with their counterpart(s) from our joint venture partners. Should, after no more than 60 days, these efforts be unsuccessful and we and our joint venture partners, on a combined basis, each own 50% of the shares in each joint venture or, when the shareholdings in each joint venture are aggregated by party, we and our joint venture partners, on a combined basis, each own 50% of the aggregate shares, we and our joint venture partners will attempt to agree within 30 days that our shareholdings be exchanged so that we own 100% of one joint venture and our joint venture partners own 100% of the other joint venture. If, however, the shareholdings are not as described in the previous sentence or we and our joint venture partners cannot agree within the specified time, we or our joint venture partners may sell our shares, including to a third party, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the shareholders’ agreement. If any of these forms of resolution were to occur, the diversity of our fleet would be reduced, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders may be adversely affected.

 

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and replace the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, each quarter we will be required, pursuant to our partnership agreement, to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available for distribution to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted.

 

We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and replace, over the long-term, the operating capacity of our fleet. Maintenance and replacement capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated with drydocking a vessel, including costs for inspection, maintenance and repair, modifying an existing vessel, acquiring a new vessel or otherwise replacing current vessels at the end of their useful lives to the extent these expenditures are incurred to maintain or replace the operating capacity of our fleet. These expenditures could vary significantly from quarter to quarter and could increase as a result of changes in:

 

  · the cost of labor and materials;

 

  · customer requirements;

 

  · fleet size;

 

  · length of charters;

 

  · vessel useful life;

 

  · the cost of replacement vessels;

 

21

 

 

  · re-investment rate of return;

 

  · resale or scrap value of existing vessels;

 

  · governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards relating to safety, security or the environment; and

 

  · competitive standards.

  

Our partnership agreement requires our board of directors to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, instead of actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, from operating surplus each quarter in an effort to reduce fluctuations in operating surplus as a result of significant variations in actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures each quarter. The amount of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by our board of directors at least once a year (with the approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors). In years when estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures are higher than actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted from operating surplus. If our board of directors underestimates the appropriate level of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, we may have less cash available for distribution in periods when actual capital expenditures exceed our previous estimates. Refer to “Item 8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—The Partnership’s Cash Distribution Policy—Estimated Maintenance and Replacement Capital Expenditures” for a description of our estimated annual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures.

 

The required drydocking or on-water surveys of our vessels could be more expensive and time consuming than we anticipate, which could adversely affect our cash available for distribution.

 

The drydocking or on-water survey of our vessels could become longer and more costly than we expect, and in the case of the Neptune and the Cape Ann could be drydocked for longer than the allowable period under the time charters. Although the Neptune and Cape Ann time charters, require the charterer to pay the hire rate for up to a specified number of days of scheduled drydocking and reimburse us for anticipated drydocking costs, any significant increase in the number of days of drydocking beyond the specified number of days during which the hire rate remains payable could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Furthermore, under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the vessel will be deemed to be off-hire if drydocking exceeds designated allowances, and under the Höegh Grace and the Höegh Gallant time charters, the vessels will be deemed to be off-hire during drydocking. There are no pass through provisions for drydocking or on-water expenses for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Grace or the Höegh Gallant. A significant increase in the cost of repairs during drydocking could also adversely affect our cash available for distribution. We may underestimate the time required to drydock or perform on-water surveys of any of our vessels or unanticipated problems may arise. If more than one of our vessels is required to be out of service at the same time, if a vessel is drydocked longer than the permitted duration or if the cost of repairs during drydocking is greater than budgeted, our cash available for distribution could be adversely affected.

 

We may experience operational problems with vessels that could reduce revenue, increase costs or lead to termination of our time charters.

 

FSRUs are complex and their operations are technically challenging. The operations of our vessels may be subject to mechanical risks. Operational problems may lead to loss of revenue or higher than anticipated operating expenses or require additional capital expenditures. Moreover, pursuant to each time charter, the vessels in our fleet must maintain certain specified performance standards, which may include a guaranteed speed or delivery rate of regasified natural gas, consumption of no more than a specified amount of fuel, not exceed a maximum average daily boil-off or energy balance, loss of earnings and certain liquidated damages payable under the charterer's charter and other performance failures. In addition, we have received the performance claims related to the Neptune and the Cape Ann described above. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters.” If we fail to maintain these standards, we may be liable to our customers for reduced hire, damages, loss of earnings and certain liquidated damages payable. Under the charterer’s charter and, in certain circumstances, our customers may terminate their respective time charters. Any of these results could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

If capital expenditures are financed through cash from operations or by issuing debt or equity securities, our ability to make cash distributions may be diminished, our financial leverage could increase, or our unitholders may be diluted.

 

Use of cash from operations to expand our fleet will reduce cash available for distribution to unitholders. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets may be limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering as well as by adverse market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions, changes in the LNG industry and contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. Our failure to obtain the funds for future capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Even if we are successful in obtaining necessary funds, the terms of any debt financings could limit our ability to pay cash distributions to unitholders. In addition, incurring additional debt may significantly increase our interest expense and financial leverage, and issuing additional equity securities may result in significant unitholder dilution and would increase the aggregate amount of cash required to pay distributions to our unitholders.

 

22

 

 

We may be unable to make or realize expected benefits from acquisitions, which could have an adverse effect on our expected plans for growth.

 

Our growth strategy includes selectively acquiring FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets that are operating under long-term charters with stable cash flows. Any acquisition of a vessel or business may not be profitable to us at or after the time we acquire such vessel or business and may not generate cash flows sufficient to justify our investment. In addition, our acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm our business, financial condition and results of operations, including risks that we may:

 

  · fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as new customer relationships, or cash flows enhancements;

 

  · be unable to hire, train or retain qualified onshore and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;

 

  · decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of our available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;

 

  · significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur additional debt to finance acquisitions;

 

  · incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with the business or vessels acquired; or

 

  · incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges.

 

Our future performance and growth depend on continued growth in demand for the services we provide.

 

Our growth strategy focuses on expansion in the floating storage and regasification sector and the maritime transportation sector, each within the LNG transportation, storage and regasification industry. The rate of LNG growth has fluctuated due to several reasons, including the global economic crisis, natural gas production from unconventional sources in certain regions, the relative competitiveness of alternative fossil fuels such as oil and coal, improvements in the competitiveness of renewable energy sources and the highly complex and capital intensive nature of new or expanded LNG projects. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth in world and regional demand for LNG, FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including:

 

  · increases in the cost of LNG;

 

  · increases in interest rates or other events that may affect the availability of sufficient financing for LNG projects on commercially reasonable terms;

 

  · increases in the production levels of low-cost natural gas in domestic, natural gas-consuming markets, which could further depress prices for natural gas in those markets and make LNG uneconomical;

 

  · decreases in the cost, or increases in the demand for, conventional land-based regasification systems, which could occur if providers or users of regasification services seek greater economies of scale than FSRUs can provide or if the economic, regulatory or political challenges associated with land-based activities improve;

 

  · decreases in the cost of alternative technologies or development of alternative technologies for vessel-based LNG regasification;

 

  · increases in the production of natural gas in areas linked by pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the development of new, pipeline systems in markets we may serve, or the conversion of existing non-natural gas pipelines to natural gas pipelines in those markets;

 

  · decreases in the consumption of natural gas due to increases in its price relative to other energy sources, regulation or other factors making consumption of natural gas less attractive;

 

23

 

 

  · availability of new, alternative energy sources, including compressed natural gas and renewables; and

 

  · negative global or regional economic or political conditions, particularly in LNG consuming regions, which could reduce energy consumption or its growth.

 

Reduced demand for LNG, FSRUs or LNG carriers would have a material adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Growth of the LNG market may be limited by many factors, including infrastructure constraints and community and political group resistance to new LNG infrastructure over concerns about environmental, safety and terrorism.

 

A complete LNG project includes production, liquefaction, regasification, storage and distribution facilities and FSRUs or LNG carriers. Existing LNG projects and infrastructure are limited, and new or expanded LNG projects are highly complex and capital intensive, with new projects often costing several billion dollars. Many factors could negatively affect continued development of LNG infrastructure and related alternatives, including floating storage and regasification, or disrupt the supply of LNG, including:

 

  · the availability of sufficient financing for LNG projects on commercially reasonable terms;

 

  · the availability long-term contracts that can support such financing;

 

  · decreases in the price of LNG, which might decrease the expected returns relating to investments in LNG projects;

 

  · the inability of project owners or operators to obtain governmental approvals to construct or operate LNG facilities;

 

  · local community resistance to proposed or existing LNG facilities based on safety, environmental or security concerns;

  

  · any significant explosion, spill or similar incident involving an LNG facility or vessel involved in the LNG transportation, storage and regasification industry, including an FSRU or LNG carrier; and

 

  · labor or political unrest affecting existing or proposed areas of LNG production and regasification.

 

We expect that, in the event any of the factors discussed above negatively affect us, some of the proposals to expand existing or develop new LNG liquefaction and regasification facilities may be abandoned or significantly delayed. If the LNG supply chain is disrupted or does not continue to grow, or if a significant explosion, spill or similar incident occurs within the LNG transportation, storage and regasification industry, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

Demand for FSRUs or LNG shipping could be significantly affected by volatile natural gas prices and the overall demand for natural gas.

 

LNG prices are volatile and affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

  · worldwide demand for natural gas and LNG;

 

  · the cost of exploration, development, production, transportation and distribution of natural gas;

 

  · expectations regarding future energy prices for both natural gas and other sources of energy;

 

  · the level of worldwide LNG production and exports;

 

  · government laws and regulations, including but not limited to environmental protection laws and regulations;

 

  · local and international political, economic and weather conditions;

 

  · political and military conflicts; and

 

  · the availability and cost of alternative energy sources, including alternate sources of natural gas.

 

24

 

 

Weakness in the LNG market may adversely affect our future business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions, as a result of, among other things:

 

  · lower demand for LNG carriers, reducing available charter rates and revenue to us from short term redeployment of our vessels between FSRU projects or following expiration or termination of existing contracts;

 

  · customers potentially seeking to renegotiate or terminate existing vessel contracts, or failing to extend or renew contracts upon expiration; or

 

  · the inability or refusal of customers to make charter payments to us due to financial constraints or otherwise.

 

Weakness in demand for FSRUs or LNG carriers could come about because of excess capacity in the market, newly built vessels entering the market and existing vessels coming off contract.

 

In general, reduced demand for LNG, FSRUs or LNG carriers would have a material adverse effect on our future growth and could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

  

The debt levels of us and our joint ventures may limit our and their flexibility in obtaining additional financing, refinancing credit facilities upon maturity or pursuing other business opportunities or our paying distributions to you.

 

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding principal on long-term bank debt of $466.1 million, and revolving credit due to owners and affiliates of $8.8 million and our joint ventures had outstanding principal on long-term debt of $202.1 million, of which 50% is our share.

 

On January 29, 2019, we entered into a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks to refinance the outstanding balances of the credit facility secured by the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. The facility is structured as a term loan with commercial and export credit tranches for each vessel to refinance outstanding amounts under the existing credit facility secured by the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace and a revolving credit tranche for the Partnership with a drawing capacity of $63 million (the "$385 million facility"). On January 31, 2019, we drew $320 million under the commercial term loans and the export credit tranches on the new facility to settle $303.2 million and $1.6 million of the outstanding balance and accrued interest, respectively, of the credit facility secured by the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace and $5.5 million to pay arrangement fees under the new facility. On August 12, 2019, we drew $48.3 million under the revolving credit tranche, of which $34.0 million was used to repay part of the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility due to Höegh LNG. Refer to “Item 5. B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt—$385 million facility.”

 

As of March 31, 2020, we had outstanding principal on long-term bank debt of $455.0 million and revolving credit due to owners and affiliates of $8.8 million and our 50% share of our joint ventures had outstanding principal on long-term debt of $397.3 million. In addition, we have the ability to incur additional debt, and as of March 31, 2020 we had the ability to borrow an additional $76.2 million under our $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG and $14.7 million on the $63 million revolving credit tranche of the $385 million facility, subject to certain limitations. If we acquire additional vessels or businesses, our consolidated debt may significantly increase. We may incur additional debt under these or future credit facilities. Our joint ventures’ credit facilities will mature in 2022 and require an aggregate principal repayment of approximately $330 million, of which 50% is our share. A portion of the credit facility secured by the PGN FSRU Lampung will mature in 2021 and requires that an aggregate principal amount of $16.5 million be refinanced. If such principal repayment is not refinanced, the export credit tranche of the PGN FSRU Lampung financing that will have an outstanding balance of $68.2 million at this time may be accelerated together with the attendant hedges. A portion of the $385 million facility secured by the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace will mature in 2026, respectively, and requires that an aggregate principal amount of $136.1 million be refinanced. If the principal repayment is not refinanced, the export credit tranche secured by the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace financing, that will have an outstanding balance of $9.5 million may be accelerated. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt—Lampung Facility” and “—$385 million Facility.”

 

25

 

 

Our level of debt could have important consequences to us, including the following:

 

  · our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes may be limited, or such financing may not be available on favorable terms;

 

  · we will need a substantial portion of our cash flows to make principal and interest payments on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations, future business opportunities and distributions to unitholders;

 

  · our debt level will make us more vulnerable than our competitors with less debt to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally;

 

  · our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic conditions; and

 

  · if we are unable to satisfy the restrictions included in any of our financing arrangements or are otherwise in default under any of those arrangements, as a result of our debt levels or otherwise, we will not be able to make cash distributions to you, notwithstanding our stated cash distribution policy.

 

Our ability to service or refinance our debt will depend on, among other things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service or refinance our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring our debt, or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all. In addition, the recent Coronavirus outbreak has negatively impacted, and may continue to negatively impact, global economic activity, demand for energy (including LNG and LNG shipping) and funds flows and sentiment in the global financial markets. Continued economic disruption caused by the continued failure to control the spread of the virus could significantly impact our ability to obtain additional debt financing.

 

The financing arrangements of us and our joint ventures are secured by our vessels and contain operating and financial restrictions and other covenants that may restrict our business and financing activities as well as our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in the financing arrangements of us and our joint ventures, including lease agreements and any future financing agreements, could adversely affect our and their ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities. For example, the financing agreements may restrict the ability of us and our subsidiaries to:

 

  · incur or guarantee indebtedness;

 

  · change ownership or structure, including mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions;

 

  · make dividends or distributions;

 

  · make certain negative pledges and grant certain liens;

 

  · sell, transfer, assign or convey assets;

 

  · make certain investments; and

 

  · enter into a new line of business.

  

In addition, our financing agreements require us and Höegh LNG to comply with certain financial ratios and tests, including maintaining a minimum liquidity and a minimum book equity ratio and require that our current assets exceed current liabilities, as defined by the financing agreements, and that our subsidiaries maintain minimum EBITDA to debt service ratios. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt—Lampung Facility” and “—$385 million Facility.”

 

26

 

  

Our joint ventures’, Höegh LNG’s and our ability to comply with covenants and restrictions contained in financing arrangements may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our and their ability to comply with these covenants may be impaired. If restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in debt instruments are breached, a significant portion of the obligations may become immediately due and payable, and the lenders’ commitment to make further loans may terminate. We and/or our joint ventures or Höegh LNG may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, obligations under our and our joint ventures’ financing arrangements are secured by our vessels and the Lampung facility is guaranteed by Höegh LNG, and if they are unable to repay debt under our financing arrangements, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

Restrictions in our debt agreements and local laws may prevent us from paying distributions to our unitholders.

 

The payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce our cash available for distribution. Our and our joint ventures’ financing arrangements prohibit the payment of distributions upon the occurrence of certain events, including, but not limited to:

 

  · failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses or other amounts when due;

 

  · certain material environmental incidents;

 

  · breach or lapse of insurance with respect to vessels securing the facilities;

 

  · breach of certain financial covenants;

 

  · failure to observe any other agreement, security instrument, obligation or covenant beyond specified cure periods in certain cases;

 

  · default under other indebtedness (including certain hedging arrangements or other material agreements);

 

  · bankruptcy or insolvency events;

 

  · inaccuracy of any representation or warranty;

 

  · a change of ownership of the vessel-owning subsidiary, as defined in the applicable agreement; and

 

  · a material adverse change, as defined in the applicable agreement.

 

Furthermore, our financing arrangements require that we maintain minimum amounts of free liquid assets and our subsidiaries and joint ventures to hold cash reserves that are, in certain cases, held for specifically designated uses, including working capital, operations and maintenance and debt service reserves, and are generally subject to “waterfall” provisions that allocate project revenues to specified priorities of use (such as operating expenses, scheduled debt service, targeted debt service reserves and any other reserves) and the remaining cash is distributable to us only on certain dates and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including meeting a 1.20 historical and in some cases, projected, debt service coverage ratio. In addition, the laws governing our joint ventures and subsidiaries may prevent us from making dividend distributions. Our joint ventures are subject to restrictions under the laws of the Cayman Islands and may only pay distributions out of profits or capital reserves if the joint venture entity is solvent after the distribution, Höegh Lampung is subject to Singapore laws and may make dividend distributions only out of profits. Dividends may only be paid by PT Höegh if its retained earnings are positive under Indonesian law and requirements are fulfilled under the Lampung facility. In addition, PT Höegh as an Indonesian incorporated company is required to establish a statutory reserve equal to 20% of its paid up capital. The dividend can only be distributed if PT Höegh’s retained earnings are positive after deducting the statutory reserve. PT Höegh has not established the required statutory reserves as of December 31, 2019 and therefore cannot make dividend payments to us under Indonesia law. However, subject to meeting a debt service ratio of 1.20 to 1.00, PT Höegh can distribute cash from its cash flow from operations to us as payment of intercompany accrued interest and / or intercompany debt, after quarterly payments of the Lampung facility and fulfilment of the “waterfall” provisions to meet operating requirements as defined by the Lampung facility. Under Cayman Islands law, Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia Holding may only pay distributions out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distribution. Dividends from Höegh Cyprus may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company. Dividends and other distributions from Höegh Cyprus, Höegh Colombia and Höegh FSRU IV may only be distributed if after the dividend payment, the Partnership would remain in compliance with the financial covenants under the $385 million facility. Please read “Item 8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—The Partnership’s Cash Distribution Policy—Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to Change Our Cash Distribution Policy.”

 

27

 

 

Höegh LNG’s failure to comply with certain obligations under the Lampung facility, and certain other events occurring at Höegh LNG, could result in defaults under the Lampung credit facility, and the failure by EgyptCo, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG, to comply with certain obligations under the $385 million facility could result in default under the $385 million facility, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Höegh LNG guarantees the obligations of PT Höegh, the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung, under the Lampung facility (as described in “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the Lampung facility, Höegh LNG must, among other things, maintain minimum book equity and comply with certain minimum liquidity financial covenants. Failure by Höegh LNG to satisfy any of the covenants applicable to Höegh LNG would result in a default under the Lampung facility. The lenders of the Lampung facility may foreclose upon any collateral securing that debt, including arrest and seizure of the PGN FSRU Lampung, even if Höegh LNG were to subsequently cure its default in the event of such acceleration and foreclosure, PT Höegh and the Partnership, as the case may be, might not have sufficient funds or other assets to satisfy all of their obligations under the related credit facility, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and would significantly reduce our ability, or make us unable, to make cash distributions to our unitholders for so long as such default is continuing. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt—Lampung Facility.” EgyptCo is a guarantor under the $385 million facility. Failure by EgyptCo to comply with its obligations under the $385 million facility or the ancillary security documents would result in a default under the $385 million facility. The lenders of the $385 million facility may accelerate all amounts outstanding and accrued and take other actions under the related security documents.

 

Höegh LNG has entered into a revolving credit facility pursuant to which it has pledged as collateral all of its interests in our general partner and all of its common units in order to secure the related loan. A default by Höegh LNG under the facility which causes the lenders to foreclose on such collateral would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

On March 27, 2020, Hoegh LNG entered into a revolving credit facility which is secured by all of the limited liability company interests in our general partner as well as all 15,257,498 of our common units that are owned by Hoegh LNG. A default by Hoegh LNG under this facility which causes the lender to foreclose on the collateral would cause an event of default under all of our long-term credit facilities and our joint venture shareholder agreements.  Our long-term credit facilities and our joint venture shareholder agreements require Hoegh LNG to own at least 25% of our common units as well as to own and control our general partner.  Höegh LNG’s ability to comply with the terms of the revolving credit facility may be affected by events beyond the control of Höegh LNG or us, including decreases in the trading price of our common units, our ability to maintain employment for our vessels and prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate and the trading price of our common units falls, Höegh LNG’s ability to meet its obligations under the facility may be impaired. A default by Hoegh LNG under the facility which causes the lenders to foreclose on the collateral and the corresponding default under our long-term credit facilities and joint venture shareholder agreements would have a material adverse effect on our  financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders.

 

An increase in the global supply or aggregate capacities of FSRUs or LNG carriers, including conversion of existing tonnage, without a commensurate increase in demand may have an adverse effect on hire rates and the values of our vessels, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

The supply of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets in the industry is affected by, among other things, assessments of the demand for these vessels by charterers. Any over-estimation of demand for vessels may result in an excess supply of new vessels. This may, in the long term when existing contracts expire, result in lower hire rates and depress the values of our vessels. If hire rates are lower when we are seeking new time charters upon expiration or early termination of our current time charters, or for any new vessels we acquire, our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders may be adversely affected.

 

During periods of high utilization and high hire rates, industry participants may increase the supply of FSRUs and/or LNG carriers by ordering the construction of new vessels. This may result in an over-supply and may cause a subsequent decline in utilization and hire rates when the vessels enter the market. Lower utilization and hire rates could adversely affect revenues and profitability. Prolonged periods of low utilization and hire rates could also result in the recognition of impairment charges on our vessels if future cash flow estimates, based upon information available at the time, indicate that the carrying value of these vessels may not be recoverable. Such impairment charges may cause lenders to accelerate loan payments under our or our joint ventures’ financing agreements, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

28

 

 

Vessel values may fluctuate substantially, and a decline in vessel values may result in impairment charges, the breach of our financial covenants or, if these values are lower at a time when we are attempting to dispose of vessels, a loss on the sale.

 

Vessel values for FSRUs and LNG carriers can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors, including:

 

  · prevailing economic conditions in the natural gas and energy markets;

 

  · a substantial or extended decline in demand for LNG;

 

  · increases in the supply of vessel capacity;

 

  · the size and age of a vessel;

 

  · the remaining term on existing time charters; and

  

  · the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing vessels, as a result of technological advances in vessel design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or standards, customer requirements or otherwise.

 

As our vessels age, the expenses associated with maintaining and operating them are expected to increase, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operations if we do not maintain sufficient cash reserves for maintenance and replacement capital expenditures. Moreover, the cost of a replacement vessel would be significant.

 

If a charter terminates, we may be unable to re-deploy the affected vessel at attractive rates and, rather than continue to incur costs to maintain and finance the vessel, we may seek to dispose of the vessel. Our inability to dispose of a vessel at a reasonable value could result in a loss on the sale and adversely affect our ability to purchase a replacement vessel, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. A decline in the value of our vessels may also result in impairment charges or the breach of certain of the ratios and financial covenants we are required to comply with in our credit facilities.

  

We depend on Höegh LNG and its affiliates for the management of our fleet and to assist us in operating and expanding our business.

 

Our ability to enter into new charters and expand our customer relationships will depend largely on our ability to leverage our relationship with Höegh LNG and its reputation and relationships in the shipping industry. If Höegh LNG suffers material damage to its reputation or relationships, it may harm our ability to:

 

  · renew existing charters upon their expiration;

 

  · obtain new charters;

 

  · successfully interact with shipyards;

 

  · obtain financing on commercially acceptable terms;

 

  · maintain access to capital under the revolving credit facility; or

 

  · maintain satisfactory relationships with suppliers and other third parties.

 

In addition, all our vessels are subject to management and services agreements with affiliates of Höegh LNG. Moreover, pursuant to an administrative services agreement, Höegh Norway provides us and our operating company with certain administrative, financial and other support services. Our operational success and ability to execute our growth strategy will depend significantly upon the satisfactory performance of these services. Our business will be harmed if our service providers fail to perform these services satisfactorily, if they cancel their agreements with us or if they stop providing these services to us. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions.”

 

29

 

 

The operation of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets is inherently risky, and an incident involving significant loss of life or property or environmental consequences involving any of our vessels could harm our reputation, business and financial condition.

 

Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as:

 

  · marine disasters;

 

  · piracy;

 

  · environmental accidents;

 

  · bad weather;

 

  · mechanical failures;

 

  · grounding, fire, explosions and collisions;

 

  · human error; and

 

  · war and terrorism.

 

An accident involving any of our vessels could result in any of the following:

 

  · death or injury to persons, loss of property or damage to the environment, natural resources or protected species, and associated costs;

 

  · delays in taking delivery of cargo or discharging LNG or regasified LNG, as applicable;

 

  · loss of revenues from or termination of time charters;

 

  · governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business;

 

  · higher insurance rates; and

  

  · damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally.

 

Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired. The costs of vessel repairs are unpredictable and can be substantial. We may have to pay repair costs that our insurance policies do not cover, for example, due to insufficient coverage amounts or the refusal by our insurance provider to pay a claim. The loss of earnings while these vessels are being repaired, as well as the actual cost of these repairs not otherwise covered by insurance, would decrease our results of operations. If any of our vessels are involved in an accident with the potential risk of environmental consequences, the resulting media coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, our results of operations and cash flows, weaken our financial condition and negatively affect our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our operations.

 

The operating of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets is inherently risky. Although we carry protection and indemnity insurance consistent with industry standards, all of the risks associated with operating FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets may not be adequately insured against, and any particular claim may not be paid. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. Certain of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual protection and indemnity associations, and as a member of such associations we may be required to make additional payments over and above budgeted premiums if member claims exceed association reserves.

 

30

 

 

We may be unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have led in the past to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. A marine disaster could exceed our insurance coverage, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business and financial condition. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our ships failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime self-regulatory organizations.

 

Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks may also make certain types of insurance more difficult for us to obtain. In addition, upon renewal or expiration of our current policies, the insurance that may be available to us may be significantly more expensive than our existing coverage.

 

An increase in operating expenses could adversely affect our financial performance.

 

Our operating expenses, on water survey costs and drydock capital expenditures depend on a variety of factors including crew costs, provisions, deck and engine stores and spares, lubricating oil, insurance, maintenance and repairs and shipyard costs, many of which are beyond our control and affect the entire shipping industry. While many of these costs are borne by the charterers under our time charters, there are some circumstance where this is not the case. For example, we bear the cost of fuel (bunkers) for the Höegh Gallant and Höegh Grace time charters, and fuel is a significant expense in our operations when our vessels are, for example, moving to or from drydock or when off-hire. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil-producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. These may increase vessel operating costs further. If costs continue to rise, they could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

 

A shortage of qualified officers and crew, including possible disruptions caused by the Coronavirus outbreak, could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

 

FSRUs and LNG carriers require a technically skilled officer staff with specialized training. As the global FSRU fleet and LNG carrier fleet continues to grow, the demand for technically skilled officers and crew has been increasing, which has led to a more competitive recruiting market. Increases in our historical vessel operating expenses have been attributable primarily to the rising costs of recruiting and retaining officers for our fleet. Furthermore, each key officer crewing an FSRU or LNG carrier must receive specialized training related to the operation and maintenance of the regasification equipment. If Höegh LNG Management and Höegh Maritime Management are unable to recruit and employ technically skilled staff and crew, they will not be able to adequately staff our vessels. Furthermore, should there be an outbreak of the Coronavirus on board, adequate crewing my not be available to fulfill the obligations under the contract. In addition, the officers and crew work on a rotating schedule. Due to the Coronavirus, we could face (i) difficulty in finding healthy qualified replacement officers and crew; (ii) local quarantine restrictions limiting the ability to transfer infected crew members off the vessel or bring new crew on board, or (iii) restrictions in availability of supplies needed on board due to disruptions to third-party suppliers or transportation alternatives. A material decrease in the supply of technically skilled officers or an inability of Höegh LNG Management or Höegh Maritime Management to attract and retain such qualified officers, or rotate and replace virus infected crew, could impair our ability to operate or increase the cost of crewing our vessels, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and significantly reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

We may be unable to attract and retain key management personnel, which may negatively impact our growth, the effectiveness of our management and our results of operations.

 

Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and the efforts of our senior executives. While we believe that we have an experienced management team, the loss or unavailability of one or more of our senior executives for any extended period of time could have an adverse effect on our growth, business and results of operations.

 

Exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations could result in fluctuations in our cash flows and operating results.

 

Currency exchange rate fluctuations and currency devaluations could have an adverse effect on our results of operations from quarter to quarter. Historically, the substantial majority of our revenue has been generated in U.S. Dollars, but we incur a minority of our operating expenses in other currencies. All of our long-term debt is U.S. dollar denominated, but we incur a minority of short-term liabilities in other currencies. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Critical Accounting Estimates—Use of Exchange Rates” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Currency Risk.”

 

31

 

 

Acts of piracy on any of our vessels or on oceangoing vessels could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Acts of piracy have historically affected oceangoing vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and the Gulf of Guinea. If such piracy attacks result in regions in which our vessels are deployed being named on the Joint War Committee Listed Areas, war-risk insurance premiums payable for such insurance coverage could increase significantly and such insurance coverage might become more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including costs that may be incurred to the extent we employ onboard security guards, could increase in such circumstances. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities, piracy or war could lead to further economic instability, increased costs and disruption of business.

 

Terrorist attacks may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to raise capital and future growth. Continuing hostilities in the Middle East may lead to additional armed conflicts or to further acts of terrorism and civil disturbance in the United States or elsewhere, which may contribute further to economic instability and disruption of production and distribution of LNG, which could result in reduced demand for our services.

 

Terrorist attacks on vessels may in the future adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation. In addition, LNG facilities, shipyards, vessels, pipelines and natural gas fields could be targets of future terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, among other things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance costs, and the inability to transport LNG to or from certain locations. Terrorist attacks, piracy, war or other events beyond our control that adversely affect the distribution, production or transportation of LNG to be shipped by us could entitle customers to terminate our charters, which would harm our cash flows and business. Terrorist attacks, or the perception that LNG facilities, FSRUs and LNG carriers are potential terrorist targets, could materially and adversely affect expansion of LNG infrastructure and the continued supply of LNG. Concern that LNG facilities may be targeted for attack by terrorists has contributed to a community and environmental resistance to the construction of a number of LNG facilities. In addition, the loss of a vessel as a result of terrorism or piracy would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are exposed to political, regulatory, and economic risks associated with doing business in different countries, including in emerging market countries.

 

We conduct all of our operations outside of the United States and expect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Some of the countries in which we are engaged in business or where our vessels are registered, for example, Indonesia, Colombia and starting in 2020, India, are historically less developed and stable than the United States. We are affected by economic, political, and governmental conditions in the countries where we are engaged in business or where our vessels are registered. We are also affected by policies related to labor and the crewing of FSRUs. Any disruption caused by these factors could harm our business. Further, we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from shipping and regasifying LNG from politically unstable regions. Future hostilities or other political instability where we operate or may operate could have a material adverse effect on the growth of our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. In addition, tariffs, trade embargoes and other economic sanctions by the United States or other countries against countries in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, South America or elsewhere as a result of terrorist attacks, hostilities or otherwise may limit trading activities with those countries, which could harm our business and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

32

 

 

  

Our vessels operating in international waters, now or in the future, will be subject to various international conventions and flag state laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment.

 

Our vessels traveling in international waters are subject to various existing regulations published by the IMO, as well as marine pollution and prevention requirements imposed by the IMO International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1975, as from time to time has been or may be amended (the “MARPOL Convention”). In addition, our FSRUs may become subject to the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea, as amended by the April 2010 Protocol to the HNS Convention (the “2010 HNS Convention”), if it is entered into force. In July 2019, South Africa became the 5th state to ratify the protocol, which must be ratified or acceded to by at least 7 more states to enter into effect. The 2010 HNS Convention is intended to put in place a comprehensive regime to address the risks of fire and explosion and to cover pollution damage from hazardous and noxious substances carried by ships, including loss of life, personal injury, and property loss of damage. If the 2010 HNS Convention were to enter into force, we cannot estimate with any certainty at this time the costs that may be needed to comply with any such requirements that may be adopted. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview –– Environmental and Other Regulation” for a more detailed discussion on these topics.

 

Our operations are subject to substantial environmental and other regulations, which may significantly increase our expenses.

 

Our operations are materially affected by extensive and changing international, national and local environmental protection laws, regulations, treaties, conventions and standards in force in international waters, the jurisdictional waters of the countries in which our vessels operate, as well as the countries of our vessels' registration, including those relating to equipping and operating FSRUs and LNG carriers, providing security and minimizing the potential for adverse impacts to the environment, natural resources and protected species from their operations. These include regulations of the IMO, including the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, as from time to time amended, the MARPOL Convention, the International Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution of 1973, the IMO International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1974, as from time to time amended (“SOLAS”), the IMO International Convention on Load Lines of 1966, as from time to time amended, and the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (the “ISM Code”) and national laws such as the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), the U.S. Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), and the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 and any counterpart laws in other jurisdictions with laws governing our operations. We may become subject to additional laws and regulations if we enter new markets or trades.

 

Many of these requirements are designed to reduce the risk of oil spills and other pollution. In addition, we believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will lead to additional regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements and greater inspection and safety requirements on vessels. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial expenses in complying with these laws and regulations, including expenses for vessel modifications and changes in operating procedures.

 

The design, construction and operation of FSRUs and interconnecting pipelines and the transportation of LNG are also subject to governmental approvals and permits. The permitting rules, and the interpretations of those rules, are complex, change frequently and are often subject to discretionary interpretations by regulators, all of which may make compliance more difficult or impractical and may increase the time it takes to secure needed approvals. The length of time it takes to receive regulatory approval for offshore LNG operations is one factor that has affected our industry, including through increased expenses.  

 

Environmental and other regulatory requirements can affect the resale value or useful lives of our vessels, require ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions, lead to decreased availability of insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports, or detention in, certain ports. Under local and national laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, we could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations, in the event that there is a release of hazardous substances from our vessels or otherwise in connection with our operations. We could also become subject to personal injury or property damage claims relating to the release of or exposure to hazardous materials associated with our operations. In addition, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations, including, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels.

 

Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulation.”

 

33

 

 

Further changes to existing environmental laws applicable to international and national maritime trade may have an adverse effect on our business.

 

We believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers will generally lead to additional regulatory requirements, including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements and greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels in the marine LNG transportation markets and offshore LNG terminals. These requirements are likely to add incremental costs to our operations and the failure to comply with these requirements may affect the ability of our vessels to obtain and, possibly, collect on insurance or to obtain the required certificates for entry into the different ports where we operate.

 

Further legislation, or amendments to existing legislation, applicable to international and national maritime trade are expected over the coming years in areas such as ship recycling, sewage systems, emission control (including emissions of greenhouse gases) and ballast treatment and handling. Such legislation or regulations may require additional capital expenditures or operating expenses (such as increased costs for low-sulfur fuel needed to meet IMO 2020 requirements) for us to maintain our vessels’ compliance with international and/or national regulations.

 

Climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions may adversely impact our operations and markets.

 

Due to concern over the risk of climate change, a number of countries and the IMO have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emission from vessel emissions. These regulatory measures may include, among others, adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. Although the emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping currently are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the “Kyoto Protocol”) or the more recently announced Paris Agreement, a new treaty or IMO regulations may be adopted in the future that includes restrictions on shipping emissions. In 2016, the IMO reaffirmed its strong commitment to continue to work to address greenhouse gas emissions from ships engaged in international trade. The IMO adopted an initial GHG reduction strategy in 2018 as a framework for further action with adoption of a revised IMO strategy targeted for 2023. The EU has indicated it intends to implement regulations to limit emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels if such emissions are not regulated through the IMO. Compliance with changes in laws and regulations relating to climate change could increase our costs of operating and maintaining our vessels and could require us to make significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. Further, our business may be adversely affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or more intense weather events.

 

Adverse effects upon the oil and gas industry relating to climate change, including growing public concern about the environmental and other impacts of climate change, may also have an effect on demand for our services. For example, increased regulation of greenhouse gases or other concerns relating to climate change may reduce the demand for oil and gas in the future or create greater incentives for use of alternative energy sources. Any long-term material adverse effect on the oil and gas industry could have a significant financial and operational adverse impact on our business that we cannot predict with certainty at this time.

 

Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Environmental and Other Regulation—Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions” below for a more detailed discussion.

 

Maritime claimants could arrest our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flows.

 

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to our vessels, owners of cargo or other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against one or more of our vessels for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. In a few jurisdictions, claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in our fleet for claims relating to another of our vessels. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could interrupt our cash flows and require us to pay to have the arrest lifted.

 

Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of earnings.

 

The government of a jurisdiction where one or more of our vessels are registered could requisition for title or seize our vessels. Requisition for title or seizure occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes her owner. Also, a government could requisition our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated hire rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although we would expect to be entitled to government compensation in the event of a requisition of one or more of our vessels, the amount and timing of payments, if any, would be uncertain. A government requisition of one or more of our vessels would result in off-hire days under our time charters and may cause us to breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities. Furthermore, a requisition for title of either the Neptune or the Cape Ann constitutes a total loss under the terms of the related facility agreements, in which case we would have to repay all loans. If a government requisition of one or more of our vessels were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for distribution to our unitholders.

 

34

 

 

Compliance with safety and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be very costly and may adversely affect our business.

 

The hull and machinery of every large, oceangoing commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society authorized by her country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and SOLAS. Each of our vessels is certified by Det Norske Veritas GL, compliant with the ISM Code and “in class.” In order to maintain valid certificates from the classification society, a vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and renewal surveys. A vessel’s machinery may be on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Each of the vessels in our fleet has implemented a certified planned maintenance system. The classification society attends onboard once every year to verify that the maintenance of the equipment onboard is done correctly. For each of the Neptune and the Cape Ann, a renewal survey is conducted every five years and an intermediate survey is conducted within 30 months after a renewal survey. During the first 15 years of operation, the vessels have an extended drydock interval which allow them to be drydocked every 7.5 years, while intermediate surveys and certain renewal surveys occur while they are afloat, using an approved diving company in the presence of a surveyor from the classification society. After these vessels are 15 years old, they are expected to be drydocked every five years or, if required by the charterers, every 30 months. We do not anticipate drydocking of the PGN FSRU Lampung for the first 20 years as all the required surveys can be done afloat. In 2019, the PGN FSRU Lampung had an on-water survey done. In the first 15 years after its delivery from the shipyard, we expect the Höegh Gallant to have a renewal survey every five years and to be drydocked every 7.5 years. The Höegh Grace is also designed to carry out renewal surveys afloat which is conducted every five years and is not expected to go into drydocking for the duration of its current charter. The Höegh Grace is scheduled to carry out an on-water renewal survey before the end of the first quarter of 2021. If any vessel does not maintain her class or fails any annual survey, renewal survey, intermediate survey or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be unemployable. We would lose revenue while the vessel was off-hire and incur costs of compliance. This would negatively impact our revenues and reduce our cash available for distribution to unitholders.

 

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act, the anti-corruption provisions in the Norwegian Criminal Code and other anti-bribery legislation in other jurisdictions could result in fines, criminal penalties, contract termination and an adverse effect on our business.

 

We may operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in full compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the “FCPA”), the Bribery Act 2010 of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (the “UK Bribery Act”) and the anti-corruption provisions of the Norwegian Criminal Code of 1902 (the “Norwegian Criminal Code”), respectively. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act and the Norwegian Criminal Code. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.

  

If in the future our business activities involve countries, entities and individuals that are subject to restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments, we could be subject to enforcement action and our reputation and the market for our preferred and common units could be adversely affected.

 

The tightening of U.S. sanctions in recent years has affected non-U.S. companies. In particular, sanctions against Iran have been significantly expanded. In 2012, for example, the U.S. signed into law the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“TRA”), which placed further restrictions on the ability of non-U.S. companies to do business or trade with Iran and Syria. A major provision in the TRA is that issuers of securities must disclose to the SEC in their annual and quarterly reports filed after February 6, 2013 if the issuer or ‘‘any affiliate’’ has ‘‘knowingly’’ engaged in certain activities involving Iran during the timeframe covered by the report. This disclosure obligation is broad in scope in that it requires the reporting of activity that would not be considered a violation of U.S. sanctions as well as violative conduct and is not subject to a materiality threshold. The SEC publishes these disclosures on its website and the President of the United States must initiate an investigation in response to all disclosures.

 

In addition to the sanctions against Iran, the U.S. also has sanctions that target other countries, entities and individuals. These sanctions have certain extraterritorial effects that need to be considered by non-U.S. companies. It should also be noted that other governments have implemented versions of U.S. sanctions. We believe that we are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations imposed by the U.S., the United Nations or European Union (the "EU") countries and intend to maintain such compliance. However, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines or other penalties and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in our units. Additionally, some investors may decide to divest their interest, or not to invest, in our units simply because we may do business with companies that do business in sanctioned countries. Investor perception of the value of our units may also be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.

 

35

 

 

We are subject to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or if we or our auditors identify and report material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, our investors may lose confidence in our reported information and it could materially and adversely affect us.

 

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we document and test our internal control over financial reporting and issue our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. This section also requires that our independent registered public accounting firm issue an attestation report on such internal control. If we fail to comply with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or if we or our auditors identify and report material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, the accuracy and timeliness of the filing of our reports may be materially adversely affected and could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common units. In addition, a material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting could result in an increased chance of fraud and the loss of customers, reduce our ability to obtain financing and require additional expenditures to comply with these requirements, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

  

A cyber-attack could materially disrupt our business.

 

We rely on information technology systems and networks, which are provided by Höegh LNG, in our operations and the administration of our business, to collect payments from customers and to pay agents, vendors and employees. Our data protection measures and measures taken by our customers, agents and vendors may not prevent unauthorized access of information technology systems. Threats to our information technology systems and the systems of our customers, agents and vendors associated with cybersecurity risks or attacks continue to grow. Threats to our systems and our customers’, agents’ and vendors’ systems may derive from human error, fraud or malice or may be the result of accidental technological failure. Our operations could be targeted by individuals or groups seeking to sabotage or disrupt our information technology systems and networks, or to steal data. A successful cyber-attack could materially disrupt our operations, including the safety of our operations and the availability of our vessels, or lead to unauthorized release of information or alteration of information on our systems. In addition, breaches to our systems and systems of our customers, agents and vendors could go unnoticed for some period of time. Any such attack or other breach of our information technology systems could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

 

Changing laws and evolving reporting requirements could have an adverse effect on our business.

 

We are subject to laws, directives, and regulations relating to the collection, use, retention, disclosure, security and transfer of personal data. These laws, directives, and regulations, and their interpretation and enforcement continue to evolve and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which regulates the use of personally identifiable information, went into effect in the EU on May 25, 2018 and applies globally to all of our activities conducted from an establishment in the EU, to related products and services that we offer to EU customers and to non-EU customers which offer services in the EU. GDPR requires organizations to report on data breaches within 72 hours and be bound by more stringent rules for obtaining the consent of individuals on how their data can be used. Complying with GDPR and similar emerging and changing privacy and data protection requirements may cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices. Noncompliance with our legal obligations relating to privacy and data protection could result in penalties, fines, legal proceedings by governmental entities or others, loss of reputation, legal claims by individuals and customers and significant legal and financial exposure and could affect our ability to retain and attract customers, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay distributions.

 

The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets as well as our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

On June 23, 2016, in a referendum vote commonly referred to as “Brexit,” British voters voted to exit the European Union (“EU”) and on January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) formally exited the EU. The British government is currently in negotiations with the EU to determine the terms of the U.K.’s exit. The withdrawal could potentially disrupt the free movement of goods, services and people between the U.K. and the EU, undermine bilateral cooperation in key geographic areas and significantly disrupt trade between the U.K. and the EU or other nations as the U.K. pursues independent trade relations. In addition, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which EU laws to replace or replicate. The effects of Brexit will depend on any agreements the U.K. makes to retain access to EU or other markets either during a transitional period or more permanently. It is unclear what long-term economic, financial, trade and legal implications the withdrawal of the U.K. from the EU would have and how such withdrawal would affect our business. In addition, Brexit may lead other EU member countries to consider referendums regarding their EU membership. Additionally, it remains possible that the U.K. and the EU do not agree on the terms of their relationship going forward by the deadline at the end of 2020. These developments, or the perception of the potential impact of such developments, have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to capital, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. As a result of the uncertainty and the potential consequences that may follow Brexit, we face risks with respect to volatility in exchange rates and interest rates due to potential effects on global economic conditions. Any of these effects of Brexit, and others we cannot anticipate, could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

36

 

 

Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us

 

Höegh LNG and its affiliates may compete with us.

 

Pursuant to the omnibus agreement that we and Höegh LNG entered into in connection with the closing of the IPO, Höegh LNG and its controlled affiliates (other than us, our general partner and our subsidiaries) generally have agreed not to acquire, own, operate or charter certain FSRUs and LNG carriers operating under charters of five or more years. The omnibus agreement, however, contains significant exceptions that may allow Höegh LNG or any of its controlled affiliates to compete with us, which could harm our business. Additionally, the omnibus agreement contains no restrictions on Höegh LNG’s ability to own, operate or charter FSRUs and LNG carriers operating under charters of less than five years. Thus, Höegh LNG’s newbuildings may compete with our vessels for rechartering for charters of less than five years. Also, pursuant to the omnibus agreement, we have agreed not to acquire, own, operate or charter FSRUs and LNG carriers operating under charters of less than five years. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Omnibus Agreement—Noncompetition.”

 

Unitholders have limited voting rights, and our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of the unitholders owning more than 4.9% of our common units.

 

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of common units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. We will hold a meeting of the limited partners every year to elect one or more members of our board of directors and to vote on any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting. Common unitholders are entitled to elect only four of the seven members of our board of directors. The elected directors are elected on a staggered basis and will serve for staggered terms. Our general partner in its sole discretion appoints the remaining three directors and set the terms for which those directors will serve. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management. Unitholders will have no right to elect our general partner, and our general partner may not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least 75% of the outstanding common units, including any units owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class.

 

Our partnership agreement further restricts unitholders’ voting rights by providing that if any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes, unless required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other common unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors. Holders of the Series A preferred units generally have no voting rights. However, in the event that six quarterly dividends, whether consecutive or not, payable on Series A preferred units or any other class or series of limited partner interests or other equity securities established after the original issue date of the Series A preferred units that is not expressly subordinated or senior to the Series A preferred units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary (“Parity Securities”) are in arrears, the holders of Series A preferred units will have the right, voting together as a class with all other classes or series of Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, to replace one of the members of our board of directors appointed by our general partner with a person nominated by such holders (unless the holders of Series A preferred units and Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred, voting as a class, have previously elected a member of our board of directors, and such director continues then to serve on the board of directors). The right of such holders of Series A preferred units to elect a member of our board of directors will continue until such time as all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series A preferred units have been paid in full.

 

37

 

 

Our general partner and its other affiliates own a significant interest in us and have conflicts of interest and limited fiduciary and contractual duties, which may permit them to favor their own interests to your detriment.

 

As of March 31, 2020, Höegh LNG owns approximately 45.8% of our common units, representing their limited partner interest in us. Certain of our directors will also serve as directors of Höegh LNG or its affiliates and, as such, they will have fiduciary duties to Höegh LNG that may cause them to pursue business strategies that disproportionately benefit Höegh LNG or its affiliates or which otherwise are not in the best interests of us or our unitholders.

 

Conflicts of interest may arise between Höegh LNG and its affiliates (including our general partner) on the one hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. As a result of these conflicts, our general partner and its affiliates may favor their own interests over the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among others, the following situations:

 

  · neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement requires our general partner or Höegh LNG or its affiliates to pursue a business strategy that favors us or utilizes our assets, and Höegh LNG’s officers and directors have a fiduciary duty to make decisions in the best interests of the shareholders of Höegh LNG, which may be contrary to our interests;

  

  · our partnership agreement permits our general partner to make a number of decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our general partner. Specifically, our general partner will be considered to be acting in its individual capacity if it exercises its call right, pre-emptive rights or registration rights, consents or withholds consent to any merger or consolidation of the Partnership, appoints any directors or votes for the election of any director, votes or refrains from voting on amendments to our partnership agreement that require a vote of the outstanding units, voluntarily withdraws from the Partnership, transfers (to the extent permitted under our partnership agreement) or refrains from transferring its units or general partner interest or votes upon the dissolution of the Partnership;

 

  · our general partner and our directors have limited their liabilities and restricted their fiduciary duties under the laws of the Marshall Islands, while also restricting the remedies available to our unitholders, and, as a result of purchasing common units, unitholders are treated as having agreed to the modified standard of fiduciary duties and to certain actions that may be taken by our general partner and our directors, all as set forth in our partnership agreement;

 

  · our general partner is entitled to reimbursement of all reasonable costs incurred by it and its affiliates for our benefit;

 

  · our partnership agreement does not restrict us from paying our general partner or its affiliates for any services rendered to us on terms that are fair and reasonable or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf;

 

  · our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase our common units if it and its affiliates own more than 80% of our common units; and

 

  · our general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon the exercise of its limited call right.

 

Although a majority of our directors will over time be elected by common unitholders, our general partner will likely have substantial influence on decisions made by our board of directors.

 

Our officers may face conflicts in the allocation of their time to our business.

 

Our sole existing officer and any future officers may face conflicts in the allocation of their time to our business. The affiliates of our general partner, including Höegh LNG, conduct substantial businesses and activities of their own in which we have no economic interest. As a result, there could be material competition for the time and effort of our officers who also provide services to our general partner’s affiliates, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, while our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer is expected to devote the substantial majority of his time to our business, he may, from time to time, participate in activities for Höegh LNG that are linked to opportunities or challenges for us.

 

38

 

 

Our partnership agreement limits our general partner’s and our directors’ fiduciary duties to our unitholders and restricts the remedies available to unitholders for actions taken by our general partner or our directors.

 

Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner has irrevocably delegated to our board of directors the authority to oversee and direct our operations, management and policies on an exclusive basis, and such delegation will be binding on any successor general partner of the Partnership. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions that reduce the standards to which our general partner and directors may otherwise be held by Marshall Islands law. For example, our partnership agreement:

 

  · provides that our general partner may make determinations or take or decline to take actions without regard to our or our unitholders’ interests. Our general partner may consider only the interests and factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting us, our affiliates or our unitholders. Decisions made by our general partner will be made by its sole owner. Specifically, our general partner may decide to exercise its right to make a determination to receive common units in exchange for resetting the target distribution levels related to the incentive distribution rights, call right, pre-emptive rights or registration rights, consent or withhold consent to any merger or consolidation of the Partnership, appoint any directors or vote for the election of any director, vote or refrain from voting on amendments to our partnership agreement that require a vote of the outstanding units, voluntarily withdraw from the Partnership, transfer (to the extent permitted under our partnership agreement) or refrain from transferring its units, the general partner interest or incentive distribution rights or vote upon the dissolution of the Partnership;

 

  · provides that our general partner and our directors are entitled to make other decisions in “good faith” if they believe that the decision is in our best interests;

 

  · generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee of our board of directors and not involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be “fair and reasonable” to us and that, in determining whether a transaction or resolution is “fair and reasonable,” our board of directors may consider the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and

  

  · provides that neither our general partner nor our officers or our directors will be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent jurisdiction determining that our general partner or directors or its officers or directors or those other persons engaged in actual fraud or willful misconduct.

 

By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder is deemed to have agreed to become bound by the provisions of our partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.

 

Fees and expenses, which Höegh LNG determines for services provided to us and our joint ventures, are substantial, are payable regardless of our profitability and will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

 

Pursuant to the ship management agreements and related agreements, we and our joint ventures pay fees for services provided directly or indirectly by Höegh LNG Management, and we and our joint ventures reimburse Höegh LNG Management for all expenses incurred on our behalf. These fees and expenses include all costs and expenses incurred in providing certain crewing and technical management services to the Neptune, the Cape Ann, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. In addition, pursuant to a technical information and services agreement for the PGN FSRU Lampung, we reimburse Höegh Norway for expenses Höegh Norway incurs pursuant to the sub-technical support agreement that it is party to with Höegh LNG Management.

 

Moreover, pursuant to an administrative services agreement, Höegh Norway provides us and our operating company with certain administrative, financial and other support services. We reimburse Höegh Norway for their reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. In addition, under our administrative services agreement, we pay Höegh Norway a service fee equal to 3.0% of its costs and expenses incurred in connection with providing services to us.

 

For a description of the ship management agreements, the technical information and services agreement and the administrative services agreement, please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions.” The fees and expenses payable pursuant to the ship management agreements, the technical information and services agreement and the administrative services agreement are payable without regard to our financial condition or results of operations. The payment of fees to and the reimbursement of expenses of Höegh LNG Management, and Höegh Norway could adversely affect our ability to pay cash distributions to you.

 

39

 

 

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a person or group from attempting to remove our current management or our general partner, and even if public unitholders are dissatisfied, they will be unable to remove our general partner without Höegh LNG’s consent, unless Höegh LNG’s ownership interest in us is decreased, all of which could diminish the trading price of our common units.

 

Our partnership agreement contains provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a person or group from attempting to remove our current management or our general partner.

 

  · The unitholders are unable to remove our general partner without its consent because our general partner and its affiliates own sufficient units to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the holders of at least 75% of all outstanding common units is required to remove the general partner. Höegh LNG owns approximately 45.8% of the outstanding common units. Additionally, during the term of the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement, Höegh LNG has agreed to continue to own common units representing a greater than 25% limited partner interest in us in the aggregate.

 

  · Common unitholders are entitled to elect only four of the seven members of our board of directors. Our general partner in its sole discretion appoints the remaining three directors.

 

  · Election of the four directors elected by unitholders is staggered, meaning that the members of only one of four classes of our elected directors will be selected each year. In addition, the directors appointed by our general partner will serve for terms determined by our general partner.

 

  · Our partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings of unitholders, to nominate directors and to acquire information about our operations as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management.

 

  · Unitholders’ voting rights are further restricted by our partnership agreement provision providing that if any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes, unless required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other common unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. Our general partner, its affiliates (including Höegh LNG) and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors.

 

  · There are no restrictions in our partnership agreement on our ability to issue equity securities, including securities senior to the common units.

 

The effect of these provisions may be to diminish the price at which the common units will trade.

 

The control of our general partner may be transferred to a third party without unitholder consent.

 

Our general partner may transfer its non-economic general partner interest to a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders. In addition, our partnership agreement does not restrict the ability of the members of our general partner from transferring their respective membership interests in our general partner to a third party.

 

Substantial future sales of our common units in the public market could cause the price of our common units to fall.

 

We have granted registration rights to Höegh LNG and certain of its affiliates. These unitholders have the right, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering any of our common or other equity securities owned by them or to include those securities in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other unitholders. As of March 31, 2020, Höegh LNG owns 15,257,498 common units and all of the incentive distribution rights. Following their registration and sale under the applicable registration statement, those securities will become freely tradable. By exercising their registration rights and selling a large number of common units or other securities, these unitholders could cause the price of our common units to decline.

 

40

 

 

As a Marshall Islands partnership with principal executive offices in Bermuda, and also having subsidiaries in the Marshall Islands and the Cayman Islands, our operations may be subject to local economic substance regulations required by the European Union, which could harm our business.

 

We are a Marshall Islands limited partnership with principal executive offices in Bermuda. Our operating company is also a Marshall Islands entity and several of our subsidiaries are organized in the Cayman Islands.

 

In December 1997, the Council of the EU (“Council”) adopted a resolution on a Code of Conduct for business taxation, with the objective of counteracting the effects of zero tax and preferential tax regimes around the world. In 2017 the Code of Conduct Group (“Code Group) investigated the tax policies of both EU member states and third countries, assessing practices in the areas of: (i) tax transparency; (ii) fair taxation; and (iii) implementation of anti-base erosion and profit shifting measures. On December 5, 2017, following an assessment of the tax policies of various countries by the Code Group, the Council approved and published Council conclusions containing a list of “non-cooperative jurisdictions” for tax purposes”). On February 18, 2020, the Council adopted a revised list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes. This revised list included the Cayman Islands. EU member states have agreed upon a set of measures, which they can choose to apply against the listed countries, including increased monitoring and audits, withholding taxes, special documentation requirements and anti-abuse provisions. The EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions is reconsidered at least once a year, and generally at six monthly intervals. The Council also confirmed on February 18, 2020 that Bermuda and the Marshall Islands had implemented all the necessary reforms to comply with the Council’s tax good governance principles ahead of the agreed deadline and were therefore moved to the list of cooperative tax jurisdictions. The effect of the Cayman Islands being included in the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and operating results.

 

In addition, the Marshall Islands, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands have enacted economic substance laws and regulations with which we are obligated to comply. Bermuda has adopted the Economic Substance Act 2018 (as amended) (the “Economic Substance Act”), and the Economic Substance Regulations 2018 (as amended) (“Economic Substance Regulations”). The Economic Substance Act requires each registered entity to maintain a substantial economic presence in Bermuda and provides that a registered entity that carries on a relevant activity complies with economic substance requirements if (i) it is directed and managed in Bermuda, (ii) its core income-generating activities (as are prescribed in the Economic Substance Regulations) are undertaken in Bermuda with respect to the relevant activity, (iii) it maintains adequate physical presence in Bermuda, (iv) it has adequate full time employees in Bermuda with suitable qualifications and (v) it incurs adequate operating expenditure in Bermuda in relation to the relevant activity. Additionally, legislation has been adopted in the Cayman Islands (which came into force on January 1, 2019) which requires certain entities that carry out particular activities to comply with an economic substance test whereby the entity must show that it (i) carries out activities that are of central importance to the entity from the Cayman Islands, (ii) has held an adequate number of its board meetings in the Cayman Islands when judged against the level of decision-making required and (iii) has an adequate (a) amount of operating expenditures in the Cayman Islands, (b) physical presence in the Cayman Islands and (c) number of full-time employees in the Cayman Islands. Regulations adopted in the Marshall Islands (which came into force on January 1, 2019) require certain entities that carry out particular activities to comply with an economic substance test whereby the entity must show that it (i) is directed and managed in the Marshall Islands in relation to that relevant activity, (ii) carries out core income-generating activity in relation to that relevant activity in the Marshall Islands (although it is being understood and acknowledged by the regulators that income-generated activities for shipping companies will generally occur in international waters) and (iii) having regard to the level of relevant activity carried out in the Marshall Islands has (a) an adequate amount of expenditures in the Marshall Islands, (b) adequate physical presence in the Marshall Islands and (c) an adequate number of qualified employees in the Marshall Islands.

 

If we fail to comply with our obligations under this legislation or any similar law applicable to us in any other jurisdictions, we could be subject to financial penalties and spontaneous disclosure of information to foreign tax officials, or could be struck from the register of companies, in related jurisdictions. Any of the foregoing could be disruptive to our business and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and operating results.

 

We are subject to Marshall Islands law, which lacks a bankruptcy statute or general statutory mechanism for insolvency proceedings.

 

We are a Marshall Islands limited partnership, and we have limited operations in the United States and maintain limited assets in the United States. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or similar proceeding involving us, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. The Republic of the Marshall Islands does not have a bankruptcy statute or general statutory mechanism for insolvency proceedings. If we become a debtor under U.S. bankruptcy law, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States, or that a U.S. bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such a bankruptcy case, or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us and our operations would recognize a U.S. bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction, if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction. These factors may delay or prevent us from entering bankruptcy in the United States and may affect the ability of our unitholders to receive any recovery following our bankruptcy.

 

41

 

 

Our partnership agreement designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our unitholders unless otherwise provided for under the laws of the Marshall Islands. This limits our unitholders' ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.

 

Our partnership agreement provides that, with certain limited exceptions, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any claims, suits, actions or proceedings (1) arising out of or relating in any way to our partnership agreement (including any claims, suits or actions to interpret, apply or enforce the provisions of our partnership agreement or the duties, obligations or liabilities among limited partners or of limited partners to us, or the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, our limited partners or us); (2) brought in a derivative manner on our behalf; (3) asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of us or our general partner, or owed by our general partner, to us or our limited partners; (4) asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Marshall Islands Act; and (5) asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our units is deemed to have received notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions.

 

Although we believe these provisions will benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law for the specified types of actions and proceedings, the provisions may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors, officers, employees and agents. The enforceability of similar forum selection provisions in other companies' certificates of incorporation or similar governing documents have been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with one or more actions or proceedings described above, a court could find that the forum selection provision contained in our partnership agreement is inapplicable or unenforceable in such action or actions. Limited partners will not be deemed, by operation of the forum selection provision alone, to have waived claims arising under the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find this choice of forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

We rely on the master limited partnership (“MLP”) structure and its appeal to investors for accessing debt and equity markets to finance our growth and repay or refinance our debt. The volatility in energy prices over the past few years has, among other factors, caused increased volatility and contributed to a dislocation in pricing for MLPs.

 

The volatility in energy prices and, in particular, the price of oil, among other factors, has contributed to increased volatility in the pricing of MLPs and the energy debt markets, as a number of MLPs and other energy companies may be adversely affected by a lower energy prices environment. A number of MLPs, including certain maritime MLPs, have reduced or eliminated their distributions to unitholders.

 

We rely on our ability to obtain financing and to raise capital in the equity and debt markets to fund our capital replacement, growth and investment expenditures, and to refinance our debt. A protracted deterioration in the valuation of our common units would increase our cost of capital, make any equity issuance significantly dilutive and may affect our ability to access capital markets and, as a result, our capacity to pay distributions to our unitholders and service or refinance our debt.

 

We have been organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of partnership law.

 

The Partnership’s affairs are governed by our partnership agreement and by the Marshall Island Limited Partnership Act (the “Marshall Islands Act”). The provisions of the Marshall Islands Act resemble provisions of the limited partnership laws of a number of states in the United States, most notably Delaware. The Marshall Islands Act also provides that it is to be applied and construed to make the laws of the Marshall Islands, with respect to the subject matter of the Marshall Islands Act, uniform with the laws of the State of Delaware and, so long as it does not conflict with the Marshall Islands Act or decisions of the High and Supreme Courts of the Marshall Islands, the non-statutory law (“case law”) of the State of Delaware is adopted as the law of the Marshall Islands, with respect to non-resident limited partnerships like us. There have been, however, few, if any, court cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the Marshall Islands Act, in contrast to Delaware, which has a fairly well-developed body of case law interpreting its limited partnership statute. Accordingly, we cannot predict whether Marshall Islands courts would reach the same conclusions as the courts in Delaware. For example, the rights of our unitholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our general partner under Marshall Islands law are not as clearly established as under judicial precedent in existence in Delaware. As a result, unitholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by our general partner and its officers and directors than would unitholders of a similarly organized limited partnership in the United States.

 

Because we are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, it may be difficult to serve us with legal process or enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.

 

We are organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, and substantially all of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, our general partner is a Marshall Islands limited liability company, and a majority of our directors and officers generally are or will be non-residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of these non-residents are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing a judgment against our assets or the assets of our general partner or our directors or officers.

 

42

 

 

Höegh LNG, as the initial holder of all of the incentive distribution rights, may elect to cause us to issue additional common units to it in connection with a resetting of the target distribution levels related to the incentive distribution rights without the approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors or holders of our common units. This may result in lower distributions to holders of our common units in certain situations.

 

Höegh LNG, as the initial holder of all of the incentive distribution rights, has the right, at a time when Höegh LNG has received incentive distributions at the highest level to which it is entitled (50.0%) for each of the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters (and the amount of each such total distribution did not exceed adjusted operating surplus for each such quarter), to reset the initial cash target distribution levels at higher levels based on the distribution at the time of the exercise of the reset election. Following a reset election, the minimum quarterly distribution amount will be reset to the reset minimum quarterly distribution amount, and the target distribution levels will be reset to correspondingly higher levels based on the same percentage increases above the reset minimum quarterly distribution amount.

 

In connection with resetting these target distribution levels, Höegh LNG will be entitled to receive a number of common units equal to that number of common units whose aggregate quarterly cash distributions equaled the average of the distributions to Höegh LNG on the incentive distribution rights in the prior fiscal quarter. We anticipate that Höegh LNG would exercise this reset right in order to facilitate acquisitions or internal growth projects that would not be sufficiently accretive to cash distribution per common unit without such conversion; however, it is possible that Höegh LNG could exercise this reset election at a time when it is experiencing, or may be expected to experience, declines in the cash distributions it receives related to its incentive distribution rights and may therefore desire to be issued our common units, rather than retain the right to receive incentive distributions based on the initial target distribution levels. As a result, a reset election may cause our common unitholders to experience dilution in the amount of cash distributions that they would have otherwise received had we not issued additional common units to Höegh LNG in connection with resetting the target distribution levels related to its incentive distribution rights.

 

We may issue additional equity securities, including securities senior to the common units with respect to distributions, liquidation and voting which would dilute the ownership interests of common unitholders.

 

We may, without the approval of our common unitholders, issue an unlimited number of additional units or other equity securities. In addition, we may issue units that are senior to the common units in right of distribution, liquidation and voting. For example, as of March 31, 2020 we have outstanding 6,625,590 8.75% Series A preferred units. The Series A preferred units rank senior to the Partnership's common units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up but junior to all of the Partnership's debt and other liabilities. The issuance by us of additional common units or other equity securities of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:

 

  · our unitholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;

 

  · the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may decrease;

 

  · we will not be able to pay our distributions to common unitholders if we have failed to pay the distributions on our Series A preferred units;

 

  · because the amount payable to holders of incentive distribution rights is based on a percentage of total available cash, the distributions to holders of incentive distribution rights will increase even if the per unit distribution on the common units remains the same;

 

  · the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit may be diminished; and

 

  · the market price of the common units may decline.

 

In establishing cash reserves, our board of directors may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders.

 

Our partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct from operating surplus cash reserves that it determines are necessary to fund our future operating expenditures. These reserves also will affect the amount of cash available for distribution to our unitholders. As described above in “—Risks Inherent in Our Business—We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and replace the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, each quarter we will be required, pursuant to our partnership agreement, to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted,” our partnership agreement requires our board of directors each quarter to deduct from operating surplus estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, as opposed to actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, which could reduce the amount of available cash for distribution. The amount of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by our board of directors at least once a year, with the approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors.

 

43

 

 

Our general partner has a limited call right that may require unitholders to sell common units at an undesirable time or price.

 

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, but not the obligation, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not less than the then-current market price of our common units. Our general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon the exercise of this limited call right. As a result, unitholders may be required to sell common units at an undesirable time or price and may not receive any return on their investment. Unitholders may also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their units.

 

As of March 31, 2020, Höegh LNG, which owns and controls our general partner, owns approximately 45.8% of our common units.

 

Unitholders may not have limited liability if a court finds that unitholder action constitutes control of our business.

 

As a limited partner in a limited partnership organized under the laws of the Marshall Islands, you could be held liable for our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if you participate in the “control” of our business. Our general partner generally has unlimited liability for the obligations of the Partnership, such as its debts and environmental liabilities. In addition, the limitations on the liability of holders of limited partner interests for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some jurisdictions in which we do business.

 

We can borrow money to make cash distributions, which would reduce the amount of credit available to operate our business.

 

Our partnership agreement allows us to make working capital borrowings to make cash distributions. Accordingly, if we have available borrowing capacity, we can make cash distributions on all our units even though cash generated by our operations may not be sufficient to pay such distributions. Any working capital borrowings by us to make cash distributions will reduce the amount of working capital borrowings we can make for operating our business.

 

Increases in interest rates may cause the market price of our units to decline.

 

An increase in interest rates may cause a corresponding decline in demand for equity investments in general and in particular for yield based equity investments such as our units. Any such increase in interest rates or reduction in demand for our units resulting from other relatively more attractive investment opportunities may cause the trading price of our units to decline.

 

Reforms, including the potential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021, may adversely affect us.

 

We have floating rate debt, the interest rate of which is determined based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). LIBOR and other “benchmark” rates are subject to ongoing national and international regulatory scrutiny and reform. For example, on July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority announced that it will no longer persuade or compel banks to submit rates for the calculation of the LIBOR rates after 2021 (the “FCA Announcement”). The Alternative Reference Rate Committee, a committee convened by the Federal Reserve that includes major market participants, has proposed an alternative rate to replace U.S. Dollar LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or “SOFR.” We are unable to predict the effect of the FCA Announcement or other reforms, whether currently enacted or enacted in the future. They may result in the phasing out of LIBOR as a reference rate. The impact of such transition away from LIBOR could be significant for us because of our substantial indebtedness. The outcome of reforms may result in increased interest expense to us, may affect our ability to incur debt on terms acceptable to us and may result in increased costs related to amending our existing debt instruments including our interest rate swaps, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions.

 

Under some circumstances, unitholders may have to repay amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under the Marshall Islands Act, we may not make a distribution to unitholders if, after giving effect to the distribution, our liabilities, other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specified property of ours, exceed the fair value of our assets, except that the fair value of property that is subject to a liability for which the recourse of creditors is limited will be included in our assets only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds that liability. Marshall Islands law provides that for a period of three years from the date of the impermissible distribution, limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at the time of the distribution that it violated Marshall Islands law will be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution amount. Assignees who become substituted limited partners are liable for the obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the limited partnership that are known to the assignee at the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations if the liabilities could be determined from our partnership agreement.

 

44

 

 

The Series A preferred units represent perpetual equity interests.

 

The Series A preferred units represent perpetual equity interests in us, and unlike our indebtedness, we will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. As a result, holders of the Series A preferred units may be required to bear the financial risks of an investment in the Series A preferred units for an indefinite period of time. In addition, the Series A preferred units rank junior to all our indebtedness and other liabilities, and any senior securities we may issue in future with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against us.

 

The Series A preferred units have not been rated.

 

We did not obtain a rating for the Series A preferred units, and they may never be rated. It is possible, however, that one or more rating agencies might independently determine to assign a rating to the Series A preferred units or that we may elect to obtain a rating of our Series A preferred units in the future. In addition, we may elect to issue other securities for which we may seek to obtain a rating. If any ratings are assigned to the Series A preferred units in the future or if we issue other securities with a rating, such ratings, if they are lower than market expectations or are subsequently lowered or withdrawn, could adversely affect the market for or the market value of the Series A preferred units. Ratings only reflect the views of the issuing rating agency or agencies and such ratings could at any time be revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the issuing rating agency. A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold any particular security, including the Series A preferred units. Ratings do not reflect market prices or suitability of a security for a particular investor and any future rating of the Series A preferred units may not reflect all risks related to us and our business, or the structure or market value of the Series A preferred units.

 

We distribute all of our available cash to our limited partners and are not required to accumulate cash for the purpose of making distributions on units.

 

Subject to the limitations in our partnership agreement, we distribute all of our available cash each quarter to our limited partners. “Available cash” is defined in our partnership agreement, and it generally means, for each fiscal quarter, all cash on hand at the end of the quarter (including our proportionate share of cash on hand of certain subsidiaries we do not wholly own):

 

·less the amount of cash reserves established by our board of directors to:

  

oprovide for the proper conduct of our business (including reserves for future capital expenditures and for our anticipated credit needs);

 

ocomply with applicable law, any debt instruments, or other agreements;

 

oprovide funds for payments to holders of Series A preferred units; or

 

oprovide funds for distributions to our limited partners for any one or more of the next four quarters; and

 

oplus, all cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter. Working capital borrowings are generally borrowings that are made under our credit agreements and in all cases used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions to unitholders.

 

As a result, we do not expect to accumulate significant amount of cash. Depending on the timing and amount of our cash distributions, these distributions could significantly reduce the cash available to us in subsequent periods to make payments on our units.

 

45

 

 

Our Series A preferred units are subordinated to our debt obligations, and the interests of holders of Series A preferred units could be diluted by the issuance of additional limited partner interests, including additional Series A preferred units, and by other transactions.

 

Our Series A preferred units are subordinated to all of our existing and future indebtedness. As of December 31, 2019, our total outstanding principal amount of debt was $466.1 million and we had the ability to borrow an additional $90.9 million under our revolving credit facilities, subject to limitations in the credit facilities. We may incur additional debt under these or future credit facilities. The payment of principal and interest on our debt reduces cash available for distribution to us and on our limited partner interests, including the Series A preferred units.

 

The issuance of additional limited partner interests on a parity with or senior to our Series A preferred units would dilute the interests of the holders of our Series A preferred units, and any issuance of Senior Securities (as defined) or Parity Securities or additional indebtedness could affect our ability to pay distributions on, redeem or pay the liquidation preference on our Series A preferred units. No provisions relating to our Series A preferred units protect the holders of our Series A preferred units in the event of a highly leveraged or other transaction, including a merger or the sale, lease or conveyance of all or substantially all our assets or business, which might adversely affect the holders of our Series A preferred units.

 

The Series A preferred units rank junior to any Senior Securities and pari passu with any Parity Securities.

 

Our Series A preferred units will rank junior to any class or series of limited partner interests or other equity securities expressly made senior to the Series A preferred units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary (“Senior Securities”) and pari passu Parity Securities. If less than all distributions payable with respect to the Series A preferred units and any Parity Securities are paid, any partial payment shall be made pro rata with respect to Series A preferred units and any Parity Securities entitled to a distribution payment at such time in proportion to the aggregate amounts remaining due in respect of such units at such time.

 

The Series A preferred units do not have an established trading market, which may negatively affect their market value and ability of holders to transfer or sell Series A preferred units. In addition, the lack of a fixed redemption date for the Series A preferred units will increase unitholder reliance on the secondary market for liquidity purposes.

 

The Series A preferred units do not have a well-established trading market. In addition, since the Series A preferred units have no stated maturity date, investors seeking liquidity will be limited to selling their units in the secondary market absent redemption by us. The trading market for the Series A preferred units on the NYSE may not be active, in which case the trading price of the Series A preferred units could be adversely affected and the ability of holders to transfer such units will be limited. If an active trading market does develop on the NYSE, our Series A preferred units may trade at prices lower than the offering price. The trading price of the Series A preferred units depends on many factors, including:

 

  · prevailing interest rates;

 

  · the market for similar securities;

 

  · general economic and financial conditions;

 

  · our issuance of debt or preferred equity securities; and

 

  · our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

Market interest rates may adversely affect the value of our Series A preferred units.

 

One of the factors that will influence the price of our Series A preferred units will be the distribution yield on the Series A preferred units (as a percentage of the price of our Series A preferred units) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, may lead prospective purchasers of our Series A preferred units to expect a higher distribution yield, and higher interest rates would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Accordingly, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our Series A preferred units to decrease.

 

The Series A preferred units are redeemable at our option.

 

We may, at our option, redeem all or, from time to time, part of the Series A preferred units on or after October 5, 2022. If we redeem Series A preferred units, holders will be entitled to receive a redemption price equal to $25.00 per unit plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. It is likely that we would choose to exercise our optional redemption right only when prevailing interest rates have declined, which would adversely affect the ability of holders to reinvest their proceeds from the redemption in a comparable investment with an equal or greater yield to the yield on the Series A preferred units had such units not been redeemed. We may elect to exercise our partial redemption right on multiple occasions.

 

46

 

  

Tax Risks

 

In addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Taxation of Partnership” and “Item 10.E. Taxation” for a more complete discussion of the expected material U.S. federal and non-U.S. income tax considerations relating to us and the ownership and disposition of our common units.

 

We are subject to taxes, which reduces our cash available for distribution to you.

 

Some of our subsidiaries will be subject to tax in the jurisdictions in which they are organized or operate, reducing the amount of cash available for distribution. In computing our tax obligation in these jurisdictions, we are required to take various tax accounting and reporting positions on matters that are not entirely free from doubt and for which we have not received rulings from the governing authorities. We cannot assure you that upon review of these positions the applicable authorities will agree with our positions. A successful challenge by a tax authority could result in additional tax imposed on our subsidiaries, further reducing the cash available for distribution. In addition, changes in our operations could result in additional tax being imposed on us, our operating company or our or its subsidiaries in jurisdictions in which operations are conducted. Moreover, tax regulation and reporting requirements for value added taxes, withholding taxes, property taxes and corporate income taxes are complex in Indonesia, Colombia, and from 2020 in India and many of the countries where we operate. Tax regulations, guidance and interpretation in emerging markets may not always be clear and may be subject to alternative interpretations or changes in interpretation over time. In particular, Indonesia, Colombia and India have complex tax regulations and reporting requirements, which if not properly applied, could result in penalties that could be significant, which could also harm our business and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Taxation of the Partnership,” “Item 5.D. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Trend Information” and note 18 under Indonesian corporate income tax and Indonesian property tax to our consolidated financial statements.

 

A change in tax laws in any country in which we operate could adversely affect us.

 

Tax laws and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. Consequently, we and our subsidiaries are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between countries in which we operate. Our tax expense is based on our interpretation of the tax laws in effect at the time the expense was incurred. A change in tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our earnings. As a result of new regulations related to property taxes in Indonesia for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, retroactive property tax and penalties were assessed for the years from 2015 to 2019. Such changes may also include measures enacted in response to the ongoing initiatives in relation to fiscal legislation at an international level, such as the Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

 

U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which would have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. unitholders.

 

A non-U.S. entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes for any taxable year in which at least 75.0% of its gross income consists of “passive income” or at least 50.0% of the average value of its assets (based on the average of the values at the end of each quarter) produce, or are held for the production of, “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property, and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income.” U.S. shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, certain distributions they receive from the PFIC, and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their interests in the PFIC. 

 

Based on our current and projected method of operation, we believe that we were not a PFIC for any prior taxable year, and we expect that we will not be treated as a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. We believe that more than 25.0% of our gross income for each taxable year was or will be nonpassive income, and more than 50.0% of the average value of our assets for each such year was or will be held for the production of such nonpassive income. This belief is based on certain valuations and projections regarding our assets, income and charters, and its validity is conditioned on the accuracy of such valuations and projections. While we believe these valuations and projections to be accurate, the shipping market is volatile, and no assurance can be given that they will continue to be accurate at any time in the future.

 

47

 

 

Moreover, there are legal uncertainties involved in determining whether the income derived from time-chartering activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. In Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the “Fifth Circuit”) held that income derived from certain time-chartering activities should be treated as rental income rather than services income for purposes of a provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") relating to foreign sales corporations. In that case, the Fifth Circuit did not address the definition of passive income or the PFIC rules; however, the reasoning of the case could have implications as to how the income from a time charter would be classified under such rules. If the reasoning of this case were extended to the PFIC context, the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time-chartering activities may be treated as rental income, and we would likely be treated as a PFIC. In published guidance, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), stated that it disagreed with the holding in Tidewater, and specified that time charters similar to those at issue in the case should be treated as service contracts. We have not sought, and we do not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on the treatment of income generated from our time-chartering activities. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. No assurance can be given that this result will not occur.

 

In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the nature of our operations will not change in the future and that we will not become a PFIC in the future. If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year (and regardless of whether we remain a PFIC for subsequent taxable years), our U.S. unitholders would face adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences. Please read “Item 10.E Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders—PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences” for a more detailed discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. unitholders if we are treated as a PFIC.

   

We may have to pay tax on U.S. source income, which would reduce our cash flow.

 

Under the Code, U.S. source gross transportation income generally is subject to a 4.0% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction of expenses unless an exemption from tax applies under Section 883 of the Code and the existing final and temporary regulations promulgated thereunder (“Treasury Regulations”). U.S. source gross transportation consists of 50.0% of the gross shipping income that a non-U.S. vessel-owning or chartering corporation, such as ourselves, derives (either directly or through one or more subsidiaries that are classified as partnerships or disregarded as entities separate from such corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and that is attributable to transportation that either begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States.

 

We believe that we and our vessel-owning subsidiaries currently qualify and we expect that we will continue to qualify for the foreseeable future, for an exemption from U.S. tax on any U.S. source gross transportation income under Section 883 of the Code, and we expect to take this position for U.S. federal income tax reporting purposes. Please read “Item 4.B— Business Overview—Taxation of the Partnership.” However, there are factual circumstances, including some that may be beyond our control, which could cause us to lose the benefit of this tax exemption. In addition, our position that we qualify for this exemption is based upon legal authorities that do not expressly contemplate an organizational structure such as ours; specifically, although we have elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we are organized as a limited partnership under Marshall Islands law. Therefore, we can give no assurance that the IRS will not take a different position regarding our qualification for this tax exemption.

  

If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 of the Code for any taxable year, we generally would be subject to a 4.0% U.S. federal gross income tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income for such year. Our failure to qualify for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code could have a negative effect on our business and would result in decreased earnings available for distribution to our unitholders.

 

The vessels in our fleet do not currently engage, and we do not expect that they will in the future engage, in transportation that begins and ends in the United States or in the provision of regasification or storage services in the United States. If, notwithstanding this expectation, our subsidiaries earn income in the future from transportation that begins and ends in the United States, or from regasification or storage activities in the United States, that income would not be exempt from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the Code and would be subject to a 21.0% net income tax in the United States (and the after-tax earnings attributable to such income may be subject to an additional 30.0% branch profits tax). Please read “Item 4.B Business Overview—Taxation of the Partnership—United States Taxation—The Section 883 Exemption” for a more detailed discussion of the rules relating to qualification for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code and the consequences for failing to qualify for such an exemption.

 

48

 

 

You may be subject to income tax in one or more non-U.S. jurisdictions, including Norway, as a result of owning our common units if, under the laws of any such jurisdiction, we are considered to be carrying on business there. Such laws may require you to file a tax return with, and pay taxes to, those jurisdictions.

 

We conduct our affairs and cause or influence each of our subsidiaries to operate its business in a manner that minimizes income taxes imposed upon us and our subsidiaries and that may be imposed upon you as a result of owning our units. However, because we are organized as a limited partnership, there is a risk in some jurisdictions, including Norway, that our activities or the activities of our subsidiaries may be attributed to our unitholders for tax purposes if, under the laws of such jurisdiction, we are considered to be carrying on business there. If you are subject to tax in any such jurisdiction, you may be required to file a tax return with, and to pay tax in, that jurisdiction based on your allocable share of our income. We may be required to reduce distributions to you on account of any tax withholding obligations imposed upon us by that jurisdiction in respect of such allocation to you. The United States generally will not allow a tax credit for any foreign income taxes that you directly or indirectly incur by virtue of an investment in us.

 

We believe we can conduct our affairs in a manner that does not result in our unitholders being considered to be carrying on business in Norway solely as a consequence of the acquisition, ownership, disposition or redemption of our common units. However, the question of whether either we or any of our subsidiaries will be treated as carrying on business in any jurisdiction, including the Norway, will be largely a question of fact to be determined through an analysis of the decisions made and powers exercised by our board of directors, the limitation of the CEO/CFO’s decision making to day-to-day management for the purpose of implementing the decisions made by our board of directors, contractual arrangements, including the ship management agreements that our joint ventures and subsidiaries have entered into with Höegh LNG Management, the sub-technical support agreement that Höegh Norway has entered into with Höegh LNG Management, the administrative service agreement we and our operating company have entered into with Höegh Norway, as well as through an analysis of the manner in which we conduct business or operations, all of which may change over time. Furthermore, the laws of Norway or any other jurisdiction may also change, which could cause that jurisdiction’s taxing authorities to determine that we are carrying on business in such jurisdiction and that we or our unitholders are subject to its taxation laws. In addition to the potential for taxation of our unitholders, any additional taxes imposed on us or any of our subsidiaries will reduce our cash available for distribution.

 

49

 

 

Item 4.Information on the Partnership

 

  A.  History and Development of the Partnership

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP is a publicly-traded limited partnership formed initially by Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. (Oslo Børs symbol: HLNG), a leading floating LNG service provider, to own, operate and acquire floating storage and regasification units (“FSRUs”), LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets under long-term charters, which we define as charters of five or more years.

 

We were formed on April 28, 2014 as a Marshall Islands limited partnership and have our principal executive offices at Wessex House, 5th Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, Bermuda. At the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”) in August 2014, Höegh LNG contributed interests in our initial fleet of three modern FSRUs to us.

 

On October 1, 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of Höegh FSRU III, the entity that indirectly owned the FSRU Höegh Gallant. On January 3, 2017, we closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities. On December 1, 2017, we closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

As of March 31, 2020, we had a fleet of five FSRUs. Our fleet consists of interests in the following vessels:

 

  · a 50% interest in the Neptune, an FSRU built in 2009 that is currently operating under a time charter with Total Gas & Power  a subsidiary of Total, a French publicly listed company, that produces and markets fuels, natural gas and low-carbon electricity, that expires in 2029, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 50% interest in the Cape Ann, an FSRU built in 2010 that is currently operating under a time charter Total Gas & Power, that expires in 2030, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 100% economic interest in the PGN FSRU Lampung, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with PGN LNG, a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, government-controlled, Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company. The time charter expires in 2034, with options to extend the time charter either for an additional 10 years or for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 100% interest in the Höegh Gallant, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, that expires in April 2020. EgyptCo had a time charter agreement with the government-owned Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company ("EGAS") until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. In addition, we have an option agreement pursuant to which we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. On February 27, 2020, we exercised the option and intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant; and

 

  · a 100% interest in Höegh Grace, an FSRU built in 2016 that is currently operating under a time charter with SPEC. SPEC is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. The non-cancellable charter period is 10 years. The initial term of the charter is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without a penalty. However, if SPEC waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, we will not be able to exercise our right to terminate in year 10.

 

Capital Expenditures

 

Our capital expenditures amounted to $0.3 million, $0.7 million and $21,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively.

 

50

 

 

  B.  Business Overview

 

General

 

We own and operate FSRUs, under long-term charters, which we define as charters of five or more years. Our primary business objective is to increase quarterly distributions per unit over time by making accretive acquisitions of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets with long-term charters.

 

We intend to leverage our relationship with Höegh LNG to make accretive acquisitions of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets with long-term charters from Höegh LNG and third parties. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement we have entered into with Höegh LNG, we have a right to purchase from Höegh LNG any FSRU or LNG carrier operating under a charter of five or more years. We cannot assure you that we will make any particular acquisition or that as a consequence we will successfully grow the amount of our per unit distributions. Among other things, our ability to acquire additional FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets will be dependent upon our ability to raise additional equity and debt financing.

 

Natural Gas and Liquefied Natural Gas

 

Natural gas is used to generate electric power, has residential and industrial use, and it is finding increasing application as a transportation fuel. The low carbon intensity and clean burning characteristics of natural gas contribute to the view that natural gas has the lowest environmental impact of hydrocarbon fuels.

 

The LNG trade developed from a need to transport natural gas over long distances with greater flexibility than is allowed by its movement via pipelines. Condensing natural gas into liquid form reduces its volume by a factor of over 600, making LNG an efficient means of transporting and storing natural gas in significant quantities. LNG is natural gas (predominantly methane (CH4)) that has been converted to liquid form by cooling it to -160 degrees centigrade under compression.

 

The processing of natural gas, transportation of LNG and regasification process requires specialized technologies, complex liquefaction processes and cryogenic materials. The specially built carriers in which LNG is transported have heavily insulated cargo tanks that maintain cryogenic temperatures by allowing a small portion of LNG to evaporate as boil-off gas.

 

LNG projects are capital intensive. LNG project sponsors are typically large international oil and gas companies often partnering with national oil and gas companies on the export side of the chain. The importers of LNG are typically large, regulated natural gas companies or power utilities. The diagram below shows the flow of natural gas and LNG from production to regasification:

51

 

 

Floating Regasification Vessels

 

Traditionally, the import of LNG and its regasification has been done in land based terminals. However, the interest in and use of floating import and regasification solutions is increasing.

 

Floating regasification vessels may be called shuttle and regas vessels (“SRVs”) or LNG regas vessels (“LNGRVs”) but are more commonly referred to as FSRUs or Floating Storage and Regasification Units. FSRU technology represents a flexible, proven, expedient and cost effective means of allowing countries or regions to import LNG.

 

The underlying technology used in an FSRU is that of heat exchange between LNG and a warm fluid resulting in vaporization of the LNG into the gaseous state for delivery to shore. The fluid may either be seawater—often referred to as open loop vaporization—or recirculated water heated by a natural gas fired boiler on the FSRU itself—often referred to as closed loop vaporization. Vaporization capacity varies by vessel and is typically specified as a combination of continuous vaporization capacity (base capacity) and peak vaporization capacity (peak capacity). The vaporized LNG is replenished by delivery of LNG into the FSRU by LNG carriers serving as feeder vessels.

 

Key benefits of FSRU technology include:

 

  · Speed. Planning, siting, permitting and constructing a traditional, land-based LNG terminal typically requires five to six years. In comparison, FSRU projects typically take less than 24 months to execute and have been implemented in as little as six months.

 

  · Reduced Costs. FSRUs are considerably less capital intensive than a land-based LNG terminal, where even small terminals can cost upwards of $600 million. More importantly, the providers of FSRUs are prepared to retain ownership of their vessels and charter them to the importing company for a short, medium or long term period, avoiding the need for major capital outlays and corresponding financing requirements.

 

  · Greater Cost Certainty. An importer has greater clarity on fees for regasification services and delivery of gas with an FSRU as compared to a land-based LNG terminal, which may be more likely to face construction cost overruns and uncertainty around terminal throughput fees.

 

  · Operational Flexibility. FSRU operators have entered into agreements as short as three years, whereas land-based LNG terminals often require long term commitments of 15 years or more.

 

  · Market Flexibility. Some FSRUs can also be operated as conventional LNG carriers and owners have been prepared to build such vessels on a speculative basis. FSRU technology has the flexibility to meet different market needs and terminal location challenges.

 

However, FSRUs are not without limitations and constraints. Land-based terminals typically have larger storage capacity and potentially larger gas send out capacities than FSRUs, especially FSRUs that are a result of LNG carrier conversions. This disadvantage could be partially mitigated by using multiple FSRUs. Greater storage capacity of land-based terminals facilitates faster cargo offload in a situation when storage tanks are partially full. The boil-off rate of an FSRU is higher than that of a land based terminal, and boil-off gas that cannot be used for fuel or regas purposes has to be flared in the gas combustion unit. The limitations on the physical size of an FSRU prevent it from having as much redundancy of vaporization equipment as a land-based terminal. As a result, an FSRU is more vulnerable to equipment outages, and thus requires the FSRU provider to hold very high standards regarding operations and maintenance. A technical problem with an FSRU could require a visit to drydock, which would result in a loss of service.

 

Our Relationship with Höegh LNG

 

We believe that one of our principal strengths is our relationship with Höegh LNG. With a track record dating back to the delivery of the world’s first Moss-type LNG carrier in 1973, we believe that Höegh LNG is one of the most experienced operators of LNG carriers, and one of only a few operators of FSRUs in the world, excluding FSRUs owned by companies dedicated to single projects, and has one of the largest FSRU fleets in operation and under construction. Our affiliation with Höegh LNG gives us access to Höegh LNG’s long-standing relationships with leading oil and gas companies, utility companies, shipbuilders, financing sources and suppliers, which we believe will allow us to compete more effectively when seeking additional long-term charters for FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets. In addition, we believe Höegh LNG’s more than 40-year track record of providing LNG services and its technical, commercial and managerial expertise, including its leadership in the development of floating liquefaction solutions, will enable us to continue to maintain the high utilization of our fleet to preserve our stable cash flows. We cannot assure you that our relationship with Höegh LNG will lead to high fleet utilization rates or stable cash flows in the future.

 

52

 

 

Business Strategies

  

  · Focus on FSRU Newbuilding Acquisitions. We intend to acquire newbuilding FSRUs on long-term charters, which we believe generally offer greater flexibility than FSRUs based on retrofitted, first generation LNG carriers. Newbuilding FSRUs have superior fuel efficiency, improved storage performance and larger capacity than retrofitted, first-generation LNG carriers. Their larger capacity allows for a full cargo from a comparably sized, modern-day LNG carrier to be offloaded in a single transfer, and this streamlines logistics. We may also acquire retrofitted LNG carriers if such vessels are converted from modern LNG carriers with comparable and logistical benefits. In addition, Höegh LNG has strong customer relationships deriving from its ability to work alongside customers on their vessel design and infrastructure needs. Moreover, Höegh LNG pursues a strategy of generally maintaining one or more uncontracted newbuilding vessels on order so it can provide its customers an FSRU with minimum lead time. We believe that Höegh LNG’s ability to offer newbuild vessels promptly and its engineering expertise make it an operator of choice for projects that require rapid execution, complex engineering or unique specifications. This, in turn, enhances the growth opportunities available to us.

 

  · Pursue Strategic Acquisitions of FSRUs, LNG Carriers and Other LNG Infrastructure Assets on Long-Term, Fixed-Rate Charters with Strong Counterparties. We will seek to leverage our relationship with Höegh LNG to make strategic acquisitions. Pursuant to the omnibus agreement that we have entered into with Höegh LNG, Höegh LNG is required to offer us the opportunity to purchase all or portion of Höegh LNG's interest in FSRUs or LNG carriers under a charter of five or more years. We also intend to take advantage of business opportunities and market trends in the LNG transportation industry to grow our assets through third-party acquisitions of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets under long-term charters.

 

  · Expand Global Operations in High-Growth Regions. We will seek to capitalize on opportunities emerging from the global expansion of LNG production activity and the need to provide flexible regasification solutions in areas which require natural gas imports. We believe that Höegh LNG’s position as one of a few FSRU owners and operators in the world, more than 40-year operational track record and strong customer relationships will enable us to have early access to new projects worldwide.

 

  · Enhance and Diversify Customer Relationships Through Continued Operating Excellence and Technological Innovation. We intend to maintain and grow our cash flows by focusing on strong customer relationships and actively seeking the extension and renewal of existing charters, entering into new long-term charters with current customers, and identifying new business opportunities with other creditworthy charterers. We believe our customer relationships are enhanced by our ability to provide expert technical advice to our customers through Höegh LNG’s in-house engineering department, which in turn enables us to be directly involved in our customers’ project development processes. We will continue to incorporate safety, health, security and environmental stewardship into all aspects of vessel design and operation in order to satisfy our customers and comply with national and international rules and regulations. We believe that Höegh LNG’s operational expertise, recognized position, and track record in floating LNG infrastructure services will position us favorably to capture additional commercial opportunities in the FSRU and LNG sectors.

 

We can provide no assurance, however, that we will be able to implement our business strategies described above. For further discussion of the risks that we face, please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors.”

 

53

 

 

Our Fleet

 

Our Current Fleet

 

As of March 31, 2020, our fleet consists of interests in the following vessels:

 

  · a 50% interest in the Neptune, an FSRU built in 2009 that is currently operating under a time charter with Total Gas & Power that expires in 2029, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 50% interest in the Cape Ann, an FSRU built in 2010 that is currently operating under a time charter with Total Gas & Power that expires in 2030, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 100% economic interest in the PGN FSRU Lampung, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with PGN LNG that expires in 2034, with options to extend either for an additional 10 years or for up to two additional periods of five years each;

  

  · a 100% interest in the Höegh Gallant, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, that expires in 2020. EgyptCo had a time charter agreement with EGAS until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. In addition, we have an option agreement pursuant to which we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. On February 27, 2020 we exercised the option and we intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant; and

 

  · a 100% interest in Höegh Grace, an FSRU built in 2016 that is currently operating under a time charter with SPEC. The non-cancellable charter period is 10 years. The initial term of the charter is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if SPEC waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, we will not be able to exercise our right to terminate in year 10.

 

Both the Neptune and the Cape Ann are owned in joint ventures with MOL and TLT, which own in the aggregate 50% of each joint venture. For a description of the joint venture agreements governing our joint ventures, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements.” The PGN FSRU Lampung is 49% owned by one of our subsidiaries and 51% owned by PT Bahtera Daya Utama (“PT Bahtera”), an Indonesian subsidiary of PT Imeco Inter Sarana, which provides products and services for various energy and infrastructure projects. Due to local Indonesian regulations, we are required to have a local Indonesian joint venture partner (e.g., PT Bahtera). However, we have a 100% economic interest in the PGN FSRU Lampung. For a description of the agreements related to this arrangement, please read “—Shareholder Agreements—PT Höegh Shareholders’ Agreement.”

 

The following table provides information about our five FSRUs:

 

                Maximum                     Charter
    Our           send out     Location               extension
    Economic     Capacity     capacity     of   Charter       Charter   option
FSRU   Interest     (cbm)     (MMscf/d)     operation   commencement   Charterer   Expiration   period
Neptune     50 %     145,000       750     Turkey   Nov 2009   Total Gas & Power   2029   Five years plus five years
Cape Ann     50 %     145,000       750     Various   Jun 2010   Total Gas & Power   2030   Five years plus five years
PGN FSRU Lampung     100 %     170,000       360     Indonesia   Jul 2014   PGN LNG   2034   Five or 10 years (1)
Höegh Gallant     100 %     170,000       500     Various   Apr 2015   EgyptCo   2025  (2)  n/a
Höegh Grace     100 %     170,000       500     Colombia   Dec 2016   SPEC   2036   n/a (3)

 

(1) After the initial term, PGN LNG has the choice to extend the term by either five years or 10 years. If PGN LNG extends the term by five years, it subsequently may extend the term by another five years.

 

(2) Pursuant to an option agreement, we exercised, on February 27, 2020, our right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Acquisition of the Höegh Gallant.”

 

(3) The non-cancellable term is 10 years. The initial term is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if SPEC waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, we will not be able to exercise our right to terminate in year 10.

 

54

 

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Neptune, the Cape Ann, the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace were approximately 10.2 years old, 9.6 years old, 5.8 years old, 5.2 years old and 3.8 years old, respectively. FSRUs are generally designed to have a lifespan of approximately 40 years.

 

From December 2016 until June 2019, the Neptune operated as the first FSRU in the Turkish market at the Etki Terminal near the port of Aliaga in Izmir province on the west coast of Turkey. From April 2018, the Cape Ann has served as an LNG carrier prior to, and subsequent to, the drydock and modifications for the charterer's new FSRU sub-contract that commenced during the third quarter of 2019. From October 2017 to March 2018, the Cape Ann was sub-chartered as an FSRU, located in Tianjin outside Beijing, China. From November 2013 to January 2017, the Cape Ann was also sub-chartered and employed as China’s first FSRU, serving the same terminal in Tianjin, China. The charterer of the Cape Ann plans to sub-contract the vessel to operate as an FSRU in India. On March 15, 2020, the Cape Ann arrived in India to commence the subcharter which will continue until the fourth quarter of 2025.

 

The PGN FSRU Lampung is located offshore in the Lampung province at the southeast coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. The vessel is moored at a purpose-built mooring system built by a subcontractor of Höegh LNG, subsequently sold to PGN LNG and located approximately 16 kilometers offshore.

 

In October 2018, the Höegh Gallant commenced operating as an LNG carrier for EgyptCo.'s charter with a third party with a term until April 2020. The FSRU Höegh Gallant operated as an LNG import terminal at Ain Sokhna port, located on the Red Sea in Egypt, until October 2018. On February 27, 2020, the Partnership exercised its option and intends to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant. The Subsequent Charter period is from the end of the existing charter until July 2025. The Höegh Gallant was delivered from the shipyard in November 2014 and employed as an LNG carrier until mid-January 2015 when it entered the shipyard for minor modifications required for the contract in Egypt.

 

The Höegh Grace is operating as an LNG import terminal in the port of Cartagena on the Atlantic coast of Colombia. The Höegh Grace was delivered from the shipyard in March 2016 and employed as an LNG carrier by SPEC from June to October 2016.

 

Each of the Neptune, the Cape Ann, the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace has a reinforced membrane-type cargo containment system that facilitates offshore loading operations.

 

Additional FSRUs

 

Pursuant to the omnibus agreement we entered into with Höegh LNG at the time of the IPO, Höegh LNG is obligated to offer to the Partnership any FSRU or LNG carrier operating under a charter of five or more years.

 

Höegh LNG is actively pursuing the following projects that are subject to a number of conditions outside its control, impacting the timing and the ability of such projects to go forward. The Partnership may have the opportunity in the future to acquire the FSRUs listed below, when operating under a charter of five years or more, if one of the following projects is fulfilled:

 

  · On December 21, 2018, Höegh LNG announced that it had entered into a contract with AGL Shipping Pty Ltd. (“AGL”), a subsidiary of AGL Energy Ltd., to provide an FSRU to service AGL's proposed import facility in Victoria, Australia. The contract is for a period of 10 years and is subject to AGL's final investment decision by the board of directors of AGL Energy Ltd. for the project and obtaining necessary regulator and environmental approvals.

 

  · Höegh LNG has also won exclusivity to provide an FSRU for potential projects for Australian Industrial Energy (“AIE”) at Port Kembia, Australia and for another company in the Asian market. Both projects are dependent on a variety of regulatory approvals or permits as well as final investment decisions.

 

Höegh LNG has four operating FSRUs, the Höegh Giant, which was delivered from the shipyard on April 27, 2017, the Höegh Esperanza, which was delivered from the shipyard on April 5, 2018, the Höegh Gannet, which was delivered from the shipyard on December 6, 2018, and the Höegh Galleon which was delivered from the shipyard on August 27, 2019. The Höegh Giant is operating on a three-year contract that commenced on February 7, 2018 with Gas Natural SGD, SA. The Höegh Esperanza is operating on a three-year contract that commenced on June 7, 2018 with CNOOC Gas & Power Trading and Marketing Ltd. which has an option for a one-year extension. The Höegh Gannet serves on a 15 month LNG carrier contract with Naturgy. The Höegh Galleon operates on an interim LNGC contract with Cheniere Marketing International LLP ("Cheniere") that commenced in September 2019.

 

55

 

 

Pursuant to the terms of the omnibus agreement, we will have the right to purchase the Höegh Giant, the Höegh Esperanza, the Höegh Gannet and the Höegh Galleon following acceptance by the respective charterer of the related FSRU under a contract of five years or more, subject to reaching an agreement with Höegh LNG regarding the purchase price. There can be no assurance that we will acquire any vessels from Höegh LNG or of the terms upon which any such acquisition may be made. 

 

The following table provides information about the additional FSRUs that we anticipate that we may have the right to purchase from Höegh LNG pursuant to the omnibus agreement or by agreement with Höegh LNG:

 

       Maximum 
       send out 
   Capacity   capacity 
FSRU  (cbm)   (MMscf/d) 
Höegh Giant   170,000    750 
Höegh Esperanza   170,000    750 
Höegh Gannet   170,000    1,000 
Höegh Galleon   170,000    750 

 

Please read “Item 7.B. —Related Party Transactions—Omnibus Agreement” for a description of our omnibus agreement.

 

Technical Specifications

 

Each FSRU in our fleet, as well as the Höegh Giant, Höegh Esperanza, Höegh Gannet and Höegh Galleon, has or will have the following onboard equipment for the vaporization of LNG and delivery of high-pressure natural gas:

 

  · High-Pressure Cryogenic Pumps. Each FSRU has, or will have upon delivery from the shipyard, high-pressure cryogenic pumps, which pressurize the LNG prior to vaporization.

 

  · Vaporizers. Each FSRU has, or will have upon delivery from the shipyard, vaporizers, which convert the LNG back to vaporous natural gas using heat generated by either steam boilers or seawater.

 

  · Dual-Fuel Diesel Electric Propulsion Plant. Each FSRU has, or will have upon delivery from the shipyard, a dual-fuel diesel electric propulsion plant, which provides the power for the vessel’s regasification, propulsion and utility systems.

 

  · Mooring System. Each of the Neptune and the Cape Ann is equipped with a submerged turret loading (“STL”) offshore mooring system and can also be moored to a jetty. The PGN FSRU Lampung is equipped for mooring to a tower yoke. The Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace, the Höegh Giant, the Höegh Esperanza, the Höegh Gannet and the Höegh Galleon are or will be equipped for quay-side mooring.

 

  · Gas Export System. The PGN FSRU Lampung has an export pipeline on her bow, which is connected via jumper hoses to the tower yoke. The Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace, the Höegh Giant, the Höegh Esperanza, the Höegh Gannet and the Höegh Galleon have or will have a high-pressure manifold on the side, to connect to the loading arms on the purpose-built jetties. The Neptune and the Cape Ann have an STL buoy system but have also been retrofitted with high-pressure gas manifold on the side, which can be connected to loading arms on a jetty.

 

Each of the Höegh Giant, the Höegh Esperanza, the Höegh Gannet and the Höegh Galleon is equipped with the same reinforced membrane-type cargo containment system as our current fleet.

 

Each of the Neptune and the Cape Ann has a closed-loop regasification system, where heat for vaporization is generated by steam boilers. The PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace and the Höegh Giant have open-loop regasification systems, where heat for vaporization is generated by pumping sea water. The Höegh Esperanza and the Höegh Gannet are equipped to operate using a regasification system that is closed-loop, open-loop or a combination of closed-loop and open-loop, i.e. any mix of seawater and steam heating. The Höegh Galleon is equipped with an open loop regasification system but is also prepared for retrofitting with a closed and combined loop system.

 

Each of the Neptune, the Cape Ann, the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace, the Höegh Giant, the Höegh Esperanza, the Höegh Gannet and the Höegh Galleon is or will be capable of operating as a conventional LNG carrier.

 

56

 

 

Customers

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total revenues in the consolidated statements of income are from PGN LNG, EgyptCo and SPEC. PGN LNG is a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, a government-controlled, Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company. EgyptCo had a time charter agreement with EGAS until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. SPEC is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. Global LNG Supply, accounted for 100% of our joint ventures’ time charter revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. During 2018, Global LNG Supply was acquired by Total, a French publicly listed company, that produces and markets fuels, natural gas and low-carbon electricity, from ENGIE. In February 2020, our joint ventures’ time charters were novated from Global LNG Supply to Total Gas & Power, a subsidiary of Total.

 

Vessel Time Charters

 

Our vessels are provided to the applicable charterer by our joint venture or us, as applicable (each, a “vessel owner”), under separate time charters.

 

A time charter is a contract for the use of a vessel for a fixed period of time at a specified hire rate. Under a time charter, the vessel owner provides the crew, technical and other services related to the vessel’s operation, the majority or all of the cost of which is included in the hire rate, and the charterer generally is responsible for substantially all of the vessel voyage costs (including fuel, port and canal fees and LNG boil-off).

 

Neptune Time Charter

 

Initial Term; Extensions

 

The Neptune time charter commenced upon acceptance of the vessel by the charterer in November 2009. The initial term of the Neptune time charter is 20 years. Total Gas & Power has the option to extend the time charter for up to two additional periods of five years each.

 

Performance Standards

 

Under the Neptune time charter, the vessel owner undertakes to ensure that the vessel meets specified performance standards at all times during the term of the time charter. The vessel must maintain a guaranteed speed, consume no more than a specified amount of fuel oil and not exceed a maximum average daily boil-off, all as specified in the time charter. On April 1, 2020, as part of the settlement of the boil-off claim with the charterer, the vessel owner and the charterer entered into an amendment to the Neptune time charter specifying a new procedure with respect to the calculation of excess boil-off under the time charter’s performance standards. In addition, the vessel owner undertakes that the vessel will be capable of discharging her cargo within a specified time and regasifying and discharging her cargo at not less than a specified rate.

 

Hire Rate

 

Under the Neptune time charter, hire is payable to the vessel owner monthly, in advance in U.S. Dollars. The hire rate under the Neptune time charter consists of three cost components:

 

  · Fixed Element. The fixed element is a fixed per day fee providing for ownership costs and all remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

 

  · Variable (Operating Cost) Element. The variable (operating cost) element is a fixed per day fee providing for the operating costs of the vessel, which consists of (i) a cost pass-through sub-element, which covers the crew (excluding the extra cost associated with a U.S. crew requirement, which is invoiced separately), insurance, consumables, miscellaneous services, spares and damage deductible costs and is subject to annual adjustment and (ii) an indexed sub-element, which covers management and is subject to annual adjustment for changes in labor costs and the size of the fleet under management.

 

  · Optional (Capitalized Equipment Cost) Element. The optional (capitalized equipment cost) element consists of (i) costs associated with modifications to, changes in specifications of, structural changes in or new equipment for the vessel that become compulsory for the continued operation of the vessel by reason of new class requirements or national or international regulations coming into effect after the date of the time charter, subject to specified caps and (ii) costs associated with any new equipment or machinery that the owner and charterer have agreed should be capitalized. Such costs are distributed over the remaining term of the time charter.

 

While the hire rate under the Neptune time charter does not cover drydocking expenses or extra costs associated with a U.S. crew requirement, the charterer will reimburse the vessel owner on a cost pass-through basis.

 

57

 

 

If Total Gas & Power exercises its option to extend the Neptune time charter beyond its initial term, the hire rate will be determined as set forth above, provided that the fixed element will be reduced by approximately 30%.

 

The hire rate is subject to deduction by the charterer by, among other things, any sums due in respect of the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy the undertakings described under “—Performance Standards” and off-hire accruing during the period. The hire rate is also subject to deduction by the charterer if the vessel owner fails to maintain the vessel in compliance with the vessel’s specifications and contractual standards, provide the required crew, keep the vessel at the charterer’s disposal or comply with specified corporate organizational requirements and such failure increases the time taken by the vessel to perform her services or results in the charterer directly incurring costs.

 

Expenses

 

The vessel owner is responsible for providing certain items and services, which include the crew; drydocking, overhaul, maintenance and repairs; insurance; stores; necessary spare parts; water; inert gas and nitrogen; communication expenses and fees paid to the classification societies, regulatory authorities and consultants. The variable (operating cost) element of the hire rate is designed to cover these expenses. Except for when the vessel is off-hire, the charterer pays for bunker fuels, marine gas oil and boil-off if used or burned while steaming at a reduced rate. Additionally, except for when the vessel is off-hire, the charterer pays for boil-off used to provide power for discharge and regasification; and fuel for inert gas, nitrogen and diesel generators.

  

Off-hire

 

Under the Neptune time charter, the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use for a specified amount of time due to, among other things:

 

  · failure of an inspection that prevents the vessel from performing normal commercial operations;

 

  · scheduled drydocking that exceeds allowances;

 

  · the vessel’s inability to discharge regasified LNG at normal performance;

 

  · requisition of the vessel; or

 

  · the vessel owner’s failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with her specifications and contractual standards or to provide the required crew.

 

In the event of off-hire, all hire will cease to be due or payable for the duration of off-hire. Notwithstanding the foregoing, hire is not reduced due to an event of off-hire if the event of off-hire does not exceed a specified number of days in any 12-month period.

 

Ship Management and Maintenance

 

Under the Neptune time charter, the vessel owner is responsible for the technical management of the vessel, including engagement and provision of a qualified crew, maintaining the vessel, arranging supply of stores and equipment, periodic drydocking and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification requirements. These services are provided to the vessel owner by Höegh LNG Management pursuant to a ship management agreement.

 

Termination

 

Under the Neptune time charter, the vessel owner is entitled to terminate the time charter if the charterer fails to pay its debts, becomes insolvent or enters into bankruptcy or liquidation.

 

The charterer is entitled to terminate the time charter and, at its option, convert the time charter into a bareboat charter, if (i) either the vessel owner or any guarantor (a) fails to pay its debts or (b) becomes insolvent or enters into bankruptcy or liquidation or (ii) the vessel owner’s guarantee ceases to be in full force and effect. Furthermore, after the fourth anniversary of the delivery date of the vessel, the charterer has the option to terminate the time charter without cause by providing notice at least two years in advance of the charterer’s election. On the date of such termination, the charterer will pay the vessel owner a specified termination fee, which declines over time and is based upon the year in which the time charter is terminated. Furthermore, the charterer may terminate the time charter if any period of off-hire due to (i) the vessel owner’s failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with her specifications and contractual standards or to provide the required crew exceeds a specified number of days, (ii) damage to the vessel’s cargo containment system as a result of the vessel owner’s failure to comply with cargo and filling level restrictions exceeds a specified number of months or (iii) any reason other than scheduled drydocking or damage to the vessel’s cargo containment system exceeds a specified number of months, unless such period of off-hire is due to the vessel owner’s failure to comply with cargo and filling level restrictions.

 

58

 

 

After attempting to take mitigating steps for a specified number of days, both the vessel owner and the charterer have the right to terminate the time charter if war is declared in any location that materially interrupts the performance of the time charter. The time charter will terminate automatically if the vessel is lost, missing or a constructive or compromised total loss.

 

Indemnification

 

No liability is imposed upon the vessel owner for the death or personal injury of the charterer, its representatives or their estates (collectively, the “Charterer’s Group”) while engaged in activities contemplated by the time charter unless such death or personal injury is by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the vessel owner, its employees or its agents. Additionally, no liability is imposed upon the vessel owner if any personal property of the Charterer’s Group is damaged, lost or destroyed as a result of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the vessel owner, its employees or its agents. Similar provisions apply to the charterer in both cases.

 

However, if any of the charterer’s representatives dies or is personally injured while engaged in activities contemplated by the time charter and as a result of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the vessel owner, its employees or its agents, the vessel owner will indemnify the Charterer’s Group, as applicable. Additionally, if any personal property of the Global Charterer’s Group is damaged, lost or destroyed as a result of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the vessel owner, its employees or its agents, the vessel owner will indemnify the Charterer’s Group, as applicable. Reciprocal obligations are imposed on the charterer in both cases.

 

The charterer will indemnify the vessel owner for losses associated with shipping documents to the extent they were signed as directed by the charterer or based upon information that it provided. In addition, the charterer will indemnify the vessel owner against taxes imposed on the vessel owner or the vessel in respect of hire by any country where loading or discharging of LNG takes place, where the vessel is located or through which the vessel travels, where the charterer is organized, does business or has a fixed place of business or where the charterer makes payments under the time charter, subject to certain exceptions.

 

The vessel owner will indemnify the charterer, its servants and agents against all losses, claims, responsibilities and liabilities arising from the employment of pilots, tugboats or stevedores, subject to certain exceptions.

 

The vessel owner will indemnify the charterer against any claim by a third party alleging that the construction or operation of the vessel infringes any right claimed by such third party, including but not limited to patent rights, copyrights, trade secrets, industrial property or trademarks. The charterer will indemnify the vessel owner for all amounts properly payable to the vessel builder if the charterer takes, or requires the vessel owner to take, any action that puts the vessel owner in breach of its intellectual property rights obligations under the vessel building contract.

 

Guarantee

 

Pursuant to the Neptune time charter, both Höegh LNG Ltd. and MOL guarantee the performance and payment obligations of the vessel owner under the time charter. Such guarantee is joint and several as to performance obligations and several as to payment obligations. If the guarantee is not maintained, the charterer may terminate the time charter.

 

Subcharter Provisions

 

The charterer entered into a subcharter to provide the Neptune as an FSRU for the Etki Terminal in Izmir province on the west coast of Turkey, pursuant to which Global LNG Supply and SRV Joint Gas Ltd. amended the Neptune time charter in December 2016 (the “Neptune charter amendments”). The subcharter terminated in June 2019. The Neptune charter amendments applied only during the term of the subcharter.

 

Cape Ann Time Charter

 

Initial Term; Extensions

 

The Cape Ann time charter commenced upon acceptance of the vessel by the charterer in June 2010. The initial term of the Cape Ann time charter is 20 years. Total Gas & Power has the option to extend the time charter for up to two additional periods of five years each. From October 2017 until March 2018, the Cape Ann operated as an FSRU pursuant to a subcharter between Global LNG Supply and CNOOC Tianjin LNG Limited Company (“CNOOC TLNG”). From November 2013 until January 3, 2017, the Cape Ann also operated as an FSRU pursuant to a similar subcharter with CNOOC TLNG.

 

59

 

 

In February 2020, Total Gas & Power entered into a subcharter with Western Concessions Private Limited, pursuant to which Total Gas & Power and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. amended the Cape Ann time charter to allow for the use of the Cape Ann at the Jaigarh Port FSRU terminal in India. Such amendments apply only during the term of the subcharter. On March 15, 2020, the Cape Ann arrived in India to commence the subcharter which will continue until the fourth quarter of 2025. On April 1, 2020, as part of the settlement of the boil-off claim with the charterer, the vessel owner and the charterer entered into an amendment to the Cape Ann time charter specifying a new procedure with respect to the calculation of excess boil-off under the time charter’s performance standards.

 

The terms of the Cape Ann time charter are substantially similar to those of the Neptune time charter unmodified by the Neptune charter amendments.

 

Subcharter Provisions

 

In connection with the subcharter, the charterer will after the expiration of the subcharter, reimburse the costs of reinstating the vessel in order for her to be in every way fitted for service under the charter, during which times the vessel will be on-hire. The charterer is also required to compensate the vessel owner for time spent and costs and expenses incurred in connection with the subcharter and arrange for the importation, stay and exportation into and from India of the Cape Ann and any materials or equipment needed for the vessel owner’s performance of the subcharter. The charterer will indemnify the vessel owner for (a) costs, claims or losses that the vessel owner incurs as a consequence of the subcharter, except if such costs, claims or losses resulted directly from the vessel owner’s material failure to comply with the time charter (unless such costs, claims or losses are already specifically addressed by the indemnity provisions of the time charter), and (b) any losses, liabilities and costs for Indian taxes, including any costs of tax and accounting compliance (including the costs of agents, tax advisers and internal and external tax controllers and costs of registering and deregistering a permanent establishment or branch in India with the Indian tax authorities) and any penalty or interest payable in connection with any failure or delay in paying or reporting Indian taxes, together with all compliance and filing costs relating to such taxes.

 

During the term of the subcharter and while the vessel is not on a voyage as an LNG carrier, certain amendments to the time charter apply, including the following:

 

·additional crew requirements, with the charterer responsible for paying for any Indian officers, crew and cadets required to be onboard;

 

·the charterer will provide port and marine facilities capable of receiving the vessel and berths and places that the vessel can safely reach and return from;

 

·in lieu of the off-hire provision, hire will be reduced proportionately to the extent the vessel does not achieve the minimum discharge rate of regasified LNG;

 

·the maintenance provisions and allowances differ;

 

·the parties waive any consequential damages arising out of or related to the use or operation of the Jaigarh Port FSRU terminal;

 

·performance standards different from those described under “—Neptune Time Charter—Performance Standards,” pursuant to which the vessel owner undertakes to ensure that the vessel consumes no more than a specified amount of fuel oil, delivers the nominated discharge rate in accordance with the daily curve agreed with the charterer, is capable of regasifying LNG in a closed-loop heating mode at a specified pressure and temperature and regasifies and discharges her cargo at not less than a regasified LNG discharge rate; and

 

·with respect to indemnification, the definition of the “Charterer’s Group” includes Western Concessions Private Limited.

 

Guarantee

 

Pursuant to the Cape Ann time charter, both Höegh LNG Ltd. and MOL guarantee the performance and payment obligations of the vessel owner under the time charter. Such guarantee is joint and several as to performance obligations and several as to payment obligations. If the guarantee is not maintained, the charterer may terminate the time charter.

 

60

 

 

PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter

 

Under a lease, operation and maintenance agreement, which we refer to as a time charter, we provide to PGN LNG the services of the PGN FSRU Lampung, which is moored at the Mooring owned by PGN LNG and located approximately 16 kilometers off the shore of Labuhan Maringgai at the southeast coast of Sumatra, Indonesia. Also, under the time charter, we operate and maintain the Mooring.

 

Initial Term; Extensions

 

The long-term time charter for the PGN FSRU Lampung with PGN LNG has an initial term of 20 years from the acceptance date of October 30, 2014. The time charter hire payments began July 21, 2014 when the project was ready to begin commissioning. At any time on or before 17 years and 183 days after acceptance, PGN LNG may exercise its option to extend the time charter for either five or 10 years. If the term is extended for five years pursuant to such option, at any time on or before the date that is 22 years and 183 days after acceptance, PGN LNG may exercise its option to extend the time charter for a subsequent five years.

 

Performance Standards

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the vessel owner makes certain performance warranties for the term of the time charter, excluding time during which the vessel is off-hire or in lay-up or a failure to satisfy any such warranty due to a “Lampung Charterer Risk Event” (which includes, among other things, any breach, act, interference or omission by the charterer that prevents or interferes with the vessel owner’s performance under the time charter) or an event of force majeure, including the following:

 

·the management warranties, which consist of the following:

  

othe vessel complies with specifications; is classed by Det Norske Veritas GL; is in good order and condition and fit for service; and has onboard all certificates, documents, approvals, permits, permissions and equipment required by Det Norske Veritas GL or any law necessary for the vessel to carry out required operations on the Mooring;

 

othe vessel owner provides shipboard personnel in accordance with specified terms;

 

othe vessel owner loads LNG in accordance with specified procedures; operates all equipment in a safe and proper manner and as required by Indonesian law; keeps up-to-date records and logs; uses reasonable endeavors to cooperate with the charterer to comply with and satisfy any requirements of any governmental authority; stows LNG properly and keeps a strict account of all LNG loaded, boil-off and regasified LNG discharged; and exercises due diligence and good industry practice to minimize venting of boil-off; and

 

othe vessel owner provides and pays for all provisions, wages and discharging fees and all other expenses related to the master, officers and crew; insurance; spare parts and other necessary stores, including lubricating oil; drydocking in emergency cases, maintenance and repairs; certificates; customs or import duties arising in connection with any of the foregoing; and consents, licenses and permits required by governmental authorities to be in the vessel owner’s name (collectively, the “Lampung Vessel Owner Expenses”);

 

  · the vessel receives LNG in accordance with a specified nominating loading rate;

 

  · the vessel consumes fuel at or below a specified amount;

 

  · during a nomination period, the vessel delivers regasified LNG at a specified average rate;

 

  · during a period in which there is no regasification send-out, no LNG transfer or cargo tank cool down ongoing and no LNG pump running in any cargo tank, the amount of boil-off does not exceed a specified percentage of cargo capacity per day;

 

  · the boil-off recondenser is able to recondense boil-off gas for the days when the vessel is sending out regasified LNG; and

 

  · the cargo capacity of the vessel does not exceed the aggregate volume of LNG that can be stored in the cargo tanks of the vessel.

 

Hire Rate

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, hire is payable to the vessel owner monthly, in arrears in U.S. Dollars. The hire rate under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter consists of three cost components:

 

61

 

 

  · Capital Element. The capital element is a fixed per day fee, which is intended to cover remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

 

  · Operating and Maintenance Element. The operating and maintenance element is a fixed per day fee, subject to annual adjustment, which is intended to cover the operating costs of the vessel, including manning costs, maintenance and repair costs, consumables and stores costs, insurance costs, management and operational costs, miscellaneous costs and alterations not required by Det Norske Veritas GL to maintain class or the IMO.

 

  · Tax Element. The tax element is a fixed per day fee, equal to the vessel owner’s reasonable estimate of the tax liability for that charter year divided by the number of days in such charter year. If the vessel owner receives a tax refund or credit, the vessel owner will pay such amount to the charterer. Similarly, if any audit required by the time charter reveals that the vessel owner’s reasonable estimate of the tax liability varied from the actual tax liability, the vessel owner or the charterer, as applicable, will pay to the other party the difference in such amount.

 

If PGN LNG exercises an option to extend the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter beyond its initial term, the hire rate will be determined as set forth above, provided that the capital element will be increased by 50% and the operating and maintenance element will equal cost pass-through.

 

The hire rate is subject to adjustment if any change in Indonesian law or tax occurs that alters the vessel owner’s performance of the time charter or the charterer requires the vessel owner to lay-up the vessel.

 

Furthermore, the hire rate is subject to deduction by the charterer for sums due in respect of the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy the performance warranties or if, as a result of an event of force majeure and subject to specified exceptions, the regasification flow rate is less than that required to meet the quantity nominated. However, any deduction for the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy the performance warranties may not exceed the aggregate of the capital element and the operating and maintenance element for that day; provided, that such cap does not apply to the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy specified fuel consumption or boil-off warranties.

 

The charterer will pay the vessel owner the hire rate for time lost due to a Lampung Charterer Risk Event.

 

Expenses

 

The vessel owner is responsible for providing certain items and services, which include the Lampung Vessel Owner Expenses and the supply of all LNG required for gassing up and cooling of the vessel. The vessel owner pays for non-Indonesian taxes and alterations required by Det Norske Veritas GL to maintain class or the IMO. The vessel owner also will provide, at its expense, accommodation space for at least two of the charterer’s employees responsible for coordinating terminal operations onshore and offshore, provided that the charterer reimburses the vessel owner for the cost of provisions supplied to such employees.

 

The charterer pays for make-up of bunker fuels provided by the vessel owner and during tests; regasified LNG for use as fuel; port charges, pilotage, towing, mooring, agency fees or customs or import duties; duties, levies and taxes relating to unloading; costs and expenses relating to terminal security required by the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (the “ISPS Code”); and mooring, periodic maintenance, repairs, insurance, inspections and surveys beyond daily inspections and capital spares. The charterer also pays for Indonesian taxes and alterations not required by Det Norske Veritas GL to maintain class or the IMO.

 

Off-hire

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if she is not available for the charterer’s use for a specified amount of time due to, among other things:

 

  · drydocking that exceeds allowances;

 

  · the vessel failing to satisfy specified operational minimum requirements, except as a result of a Lampung Charterer Risk Event or an event of force majeure; or

 

  · the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy the management warranties described above under “—Performance Standards.”

 

In the event of off-hire, all hire will cease to be due or payable for the duration of off-hire. Notwithstanding the foregoing, hire is not reduced due to an event of off-hire if the event of off-hire does not exceed a specified number of hours in any 12-month period.

 

62

 

 

Technical Support

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the vessel owner is responsible for the technical support services with respect to the vessel, including engagement and provision of a qualified crew, maintaining the vessel, arranging supply of stores and equipment, periodic drydocking and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification requirements. These services are provided by Höegh LNG Management pursuant to the technical information and services agreement between the vessel owner and Höegh Norway and the sub-technical support agreement between Höegh Norway and Höegh LNG Management.

 

Termination

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the charterer is entitled to terminate the time charter for the following reasons:

 

  · if, due to one of several specified events of force majeure (“Lampung Nongovernmental Force Majeure”) that results in physical damage to the vessel or the Mooring in respect of which insurance proceeds are payable under the loss of hire insurance and hull and machinery insurance (“Lampung Vessel Force Majeure”), the vessel owner is unable to comply with nominations for a specified number of days;

 

  · if, due to an event of force majeure that is not Lampung Nongovernmental Force Majeure or Lampung Vessel Force Majeure (“Lampung Other Force Majeure”), the vessel owner is unable to comply with nominations for a specified number of days; or

 

  · if there has been an event of force majeure caused by the Indonesian government (“Lampung Governmental Force Majeure”) during a specified number of days.

 

If the charterer terminates for Lampung Other Force Majeure or Lampung Governmental Force Majeure, the charterer will pay the vessel owner a specified termination fee based upon the year in which the time charter is terminated.

 

Additionally, after the occurrence of an event of default by the vessel owner, and while such event of default continues, the charterer may terminate the time charter. If the charterer terminates the time charter for certain events of default that the vessel owner intentionally or deliberately committed for the purpose of terminating the time charter so that the vessel owner could employ the vessel with a third party, the vessel owner will transfer the vessel’s title to the charterer.

 

The vessel owner may terminate the time charter after the occurrence of an event of default by the charterer while such event of default continues. If the charterer fails to pay invoiced amounts when due and such failure continues for a specified number of days following notice from the vessel owner, the vessel owner may suspend its performance and remain on-hire until such failure is corrected.

 

If the time charter is terminated by the vessel owner for an event of default of the charterer, the charterer will pay the vessel owner a specified termination fee based upon the year in which the time charter is terminated. Under such circumstances, as well as if the time charter is terminated by the charterer for Lampung Governmental Force Majeure, the vessel owner may require that the parties begin negotiation of terms under which the vessel owner would be willing to sell to the charterer a 50% ownership interest in the vessel for a specified amount that declines over time and is based upon the year in which the time charter is terminated. If the charterer terminates the time charter for force majeure other than Lampung Governmental Force Majeure or an event of default of the vessel owner, the charterer may require the parties to begin such negotiation.

 

The time charter will terminate automatically if the vessel is lost or a constructive total loss.

 

Indemnification

 

For losses arising out of claims for illness or injuries to or death of any employees of the vessel owner, the vessel owner’s affiliates, certain subcontractors of the vessel owner, persons contracting with the vessel owner under the building contract or the Mooring contract and representatives of each of the foregoing (collectively, the “Lampung Owner’s Group”), the vessel owner will indemnify the charterer, certain affiliates and subcontractors of the charterer, persons executing tug charters and terminal use agreements, persons receiving regasified LNG delivered by the vessel and representatives of each of the foregoing (collectively, the “Lampung Charterer’s Group”). Reciprocal obligations are imposed on the charterer.

 

For losses arising out of claims for damage to or loss of the vessel or property, equipment or materials owned or leased by any member of the Lampung Owner’s Group, the vessel owner will indemnify the Lampung Charterer’s Group. Similarly, the charterer will indemnify the Lampung Owner’s Group for losses arising out of claims for damage to or loss of property, equipment or materials owned or leased by any member of the Lampung Charterer’s Group or LNG stored on the vessel or the Mooring.

 

63

 

 

For losses arising from pollution or contamination created by the vessel or the operation thereof or the Mooring, the vessel owner will indemnify the Lampung Charterer’s Group; provided, that the vessel owner’s aggregate liability for each applicable accident will not exceed $150,000,000. For losses arising from pollution or contamination created by, or directly related to, the operation of the downstream pipeline, any LNG carrier or any vessel operating under a tug charter, the charterer will indemnify the Lampung Owner’s Group.

 

Purchase Option

 

PGN LNG was granted an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung at specified prices based upon the year in which the option is exercised. Such option to purchase may be exercised commencing in June 2018; however, it may not be exercised if either of the charter extension options has expired without exercise. The option is exercisable upon PGN LNG giving us notice specifying the time and date of delivery, which must be after the third anniversary of the date of delivery. The option to purchase survives termination of the time charter. PGN LNG has discussed alternatives regarding the option, among other contractual provisions. However, no notice has been provided to indicate an intention of exercising this option as of March 31, 2020. Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Inherent in Our Business—PGN LNG and SPEC have options to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung and Höegh Grace, respectively. If either charterer exercises its option, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flows and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.”

 

Guarantee

 

Pursuant to the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, Höegh LNG guarantees the due and proper performance by PT Höegh of all its obligations and liabilities under the time charter.

 

Höegh Gallant Time Charter

 

Term

 

The Höegh Gallant lease and maintenance agreement (the “Höegh Gallant time charter”) commenced in April 2015. The term of the Höegh Gallant time charter is 5 years.

 

Performance Standards

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, the vessel owner undertakes to maintain the vessel in accordance with international standards, provide a suitably qualified marine crew and comply with applicable laws, rules and regulation at all times during the term of the time charter.

 

Hire Rate

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, hire to the vessel owner is payable monthly, in arrears, with the rate denominated 90% in U.S. Dollars and 10% in EGP. The hire rate under the Höegh Gallant time charter has only one component, which is intended to cover remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services as well as the operating and maintenance costs of the vessel, including manning costs, the cost of spare parts and any tax incurred.

 

The Höegh Gallant time charter does not have any pass-through provisions for drydocking expenses.

 

A price review of the hire rate may be conducted after three years, but a revised rate can only be implemented upon written agreement by both parties.

 

Höegh LNG guarantees the payment of hire by the charterer (EgyptCo) under the Höegh Gallant time charter but only to the extent that the failure of the charterer to pay such hire is caused by the breach by EGAS of its obligation to make payments under EgyptCo’s contractual arrangements with EGAS (and the charterer is unable to draw upon EGAS’ performance guarantees.

 

Expenses

 

The vessel owner is responsible for providing certain items and services, which include the crew; bunker fuel, drydocking, overhaul, maintenance and repairs; insurance; stores; necessary spare parts; communication expenses and fees paid to the classification societies, regulatory authorities and consultants. The hire rate is designed to cover these expenses except for when the vessel is off-hire. The charterer pays for port and light dues.

 

64

 

 

Off-hire

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if she is not available for the charterer’s use due to, among other things:

 

  · drydocking or other repairs and maintenance;

 

  · any damage, defect, breakdown or deficiency to the vessel;

 

  · any deficiency of crew, stores, repairs, surveys, or similar cause preventing the working of the vessel;

 

  · any labor dispute, failure or inability of the officers or crew to perform the required services; or

 

  · any failure to comply with laws, regulations or operational practices at the site of the vessel operations.

 

In the event of off-hire, all hire will cease to be due or payable for the duration of off-hire. Except for force majeure events and a specified maintenance allowance period, the vessel owner will be obligated to indemnify the charterer (up to a specified cap) for losses suffered during off-hire, including loss of earnings and certain liquidated damages payable under the charterer’s charter.

 

Ship Management and Maintenance

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, the vessel owner is responsible for the technical management of the vessel, including engagement and provision of a qualified crew, maintaining the vessel, arranging supply of stores and equipment, periodic drydocking and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification requirements. The crew is provided to the vessel owner by Höegh Maritime Management pursuant to a secondment agreement. The remaining services are provided to the vessel owner by Höegh LNG Management pursuant to a ship management agreement.

 

Termination

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, the vessel owner is entitled to terminate the time charter if the charterer fails to pay its hire, debts, becomes insolvent, enters into bankruptcy or liquidation or otherwise materially breaches the terms of the charter.

 

The charterer is entitled to terminate the time charter if (i) the vessel owner (a) fails to pay its debts or is otherwise insolvent, (b) enters into bankruptcy or liquidation, (c) fails to maintain insurance or classification or (d) is otherwise in material breach of the terms of the agreement or (ii) the vessel is unavailable for the charterer for a specified period of days in any contract year. Furthermore, following the expiration of the third year of the contract term, the charterer may request to meet with the vessel owner to seek mutual agreement on terms for early termination of the time charter. After attempting to take mitigating steps, both the vessel owner and the charterer have the right to terminate the time charter if war is declared at the vessel site. The time charter will terminate automatically if the vessel is lost, missing or a constructive or compromised total loss.

 

Indemnification

 

The charterer will indemnify the vessel owner for any damage or loss of property, death or personal injury of the charterer, its affiliates or their contractors (collectively, the “Charterer Indemnified Parties”) regardless of cause or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the vessel owner, its affiliates or their contractors (collectively, the “Owner Indemnified Parties”) caused or contributed to the damages. The charter will indemnify the Owner Indemnified Parties for (i) all damage and harm to the environment, including damages for control remediation and clean-up of all pollution arising from pollution, which originates from the property of any Charterer Indemnified Parties, regardless of fault or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the Owner Indemnified Parties caused or contributed to the damages and (ii) losses caused by any non-compliance with sanctions as a consequence of the charterer's use of the vessel.

 

The vessel owner will indemnify the charterer for any damage or loss of the vessel and of its property and any cargo on board, and any death or personal injury of the Owner Indemnified Parties regardless of cause or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the Charterer Indemnified Parties caused or contributed to the damages. The vessel owner will indemnify the Charterer Indemnified Parties for all damage and harm to the environment, including damages for control remediation and clean-up of all pollution arising from pollution, which originates from the vessel, regardless of fault or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the Charterer Indemnified Parties caused or contributed to the damages.

 

65

 

 

Each of the vessel owner and the charterer will indemnify the other party for any loss, damage to any property or injury or death arising out of the time charter suffered by any third party, for which the vessel owner or charterer, as applicable, is responsible.

 

Option Agreement

 

In addition, we entered into an option agreement with Höegh LNG pursuant to which we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025 at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter with EgyptCo, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. See “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Acquisition of the Höegh Gallant.” On February 27, 2020, we exercised the option to enter into a Subsequent Charter, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Conflicts Committee and Board of Directors.

 

Höegh Grace Charter

 

The Höegh Grace is subject to two material agreements with SPEC: an International Leasing Agreement, pursuant to which Höegh FSRU IV leases the vessel to SPEC (the “ILA”) and the FSRU Operation and Services Agreement, pursuant to which Höegh Colombia provides certain operational services to SPEC with respect to the vessel (the “OSA”). The ILA and the OSA are collectively referred to herein as the “Höegh Grace charter.”

 

Term and Termination

 

The Höegh Grace charter has a term of 20 years. Each party has an unconditional option to cancel the Höegh Grace charter after 10 and 15 years without a penalty. However, if the charterer waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, the vessel owner will not be able to exercise its right to terminate in year 10. Accordingly, the non-cancellable charter period is for 10 years.

 

There are certain conditions under which the Höegh Grace charter could terminate prior to its expiration date. The charter will terminate automatically upon the loss of the vessel. Either party may also terminate the charter for force majeure after a specified period. Additionally, either party may elect to terminate the charter upon the occurrence of specified events of default. The charterer also has the right to terminate the charter in the event of a prolonged off-hire period. If the ILA is terminated for any reason, the OSA will automatically terminate as well.

 

Performance Standards

 

Under the Höegh Grace charter, the vessel owner undertakes to ensure that the vessel meets specified performance standards at all times during the term of the charter. The vessel owner is required to pay liquidated damages in the event that the Höegh Grace is unable to accept all or part of a delivered LNG cargo, is unable to deliver the specified amount of regasified natural gas, exceeds a maximum average daily boil-off, consumes more than a specified amount of fuel or suffers other performance failures, which damages are subject to various caps per cargo, per year and in the aggregate for the term of the Höegh Grace charter.

 

Hire Rate

 

Under the Höegh Grace charter, hire is payable monthly, in arrears, in U.S. Dollars. The charterer pays a fixed daily rate of hire (with respect to the ILA) and operating fees (with respect to the OSA), as set forth in the Höegh Grace charter. Under the OSA, the operating fees are escalated yearly by a fixed percentage, and the OSA provides for a review and reasonable adjustment by the parties if the actual operating costs increase by more than such percentage over a period of three consecutive years.

 

Expenses

 

The vessel owner is responsible for providing certain items and services, which include the crew; bunker fuel, drydocking, overhaul, maintenance and repairs; insurance; stores; necessary spare parts; communication expenses and fees paid to the classification societies and regulatory authorities. The hire rate is designed to cover these expenses except for when the vessel is off-hire. The charterer pays for fuel oil and port expenses.

 

Off-hire

 

Except for force majeure events and a specified maintenance allowance period, under the Höegh Grace charter the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire:

 

66

 

 

  · if the vessel is not able to discharge regasified LNG at a specified rate;

 

  · if the vessel owner breaches its warranties related to international sanctions; or

 

  · if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use due to, among other things:

 

  o any damage, defect, breakdown or deficiency to the vessel;

 

  o any deficiency of crew, stores, repairs, surveys, or similar cause preventing the working of the vessel;

 

  o any labor dispute, failure or inability of the officers or crew to perform the required services; or

 

  o any failure to comply with laws, regulations or operational practices at the site of the vessel operations.

 

In the event of off-hire, all hire will cease to be due or payable for the duration of off-hire.

 

Ship Management and Maintenance

 

Under the Höegh Grace charter, the vessel owner is responsible for the technical management of the vessel, including engagement and provision of a qualified crew, maintaining the vessel, arranging supply of stores and equipment, periodic drydocking and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification requirements. The vessel owner has entered into services agreements with affiliates of Höegh LNG and Höegh Autoliners Ltd. to provide certain of these services. See “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Support Agreement” and “— Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

Indemnification

 

The charterer will indemnify the vessel owner for any damage or loss to the charterer’s vessel interconnection infrastructure, including the jetty and interconnection pipeline, or to any other property, death or personal injury of the charterer, its affiliates or their contractors (collectively, the “Charterer Indemnified Parties”) regardless of cause or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the vessel owner, its affiliates or their contractors (collectively, the “Owner Indemnified Parties”) caused or contributed to the damages. The charter will indemnify the Owner Indemnified Parties for all damage and harm to the environment, including fines imposed by a governmental authority, including damages for control, remediation and clean-up of all pollution or contamination that originates from the charterer’s vessel interconnection infrastructure, including the jetty and interconnection pipeline, or any other property of any Charterer Indemnified Parties, regardless of fault.

 

The vessel owner will indemnify the charterer for any damage or loss of the vessel and of its property, and any death or personal injury of the Owner Indemnified Parties regardless of cause or whether or not the negligence, omission or default of the Charterer Indemnified Parties caused or contributed to the damages. The vessel owner will indemnify the Charterer Indemnified Parties for all damage and harm to the environment, including fines imposed by a governmental authority, including damages for control, remediation and cleanup of all pollution or contamination that originates from the vessel, regardless of fault.

 

Each of the vessel owner and the charterer will indemnify the other party for any loss, damage to any property or injury or death suffered by any third party, caused by the vessel owner or charterer, as applicable.

 

Purchase Option

 

Pursuant to the Höegh Grace charter, the charterer has the option to purchase the Höegh Grace in year 10, year 15 and year 20 at a price specified in the Höegh Grace charter. The option is exercisable upon the charterer giving notice at the end of the applicable term and survives any early termination of the charter in year 10 or year 15 thereof. Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Inherent in Our Business—PGN LNG and SPEC have options to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung and Höegh Grace, respectively. If either charterer exercises its option, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating cash flows and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.”

 

Guarantee

 

The Partnership guarantees the performance of Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia under the Höegh Grace charter.

 

67

 

 

Shareholder Agreements

 

The following provides a summary of the governance, distribution and other significant terms of our shareholders’ agreements.

 

SRV Joint Gas Shareholders’ Agreement

 

We hold our interests in two vessels in our fleet through the following joint ventures (collectively, the “SRV Joint Gas joint ventures”):

 

  · SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (owner of the Neptune), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, 50% of the equity interests of which are owned by our operating company, 48.5% of which are owned by MOL, and 1.5% of which are owned by TLT; and

 

  · SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (owner of the Cape Ann), a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, 50% of the equity interests of which are owned by our operating company, 48.5% of which are owned by MOL and 1.5% of which are owned by TLT.

 

The SRV Joint Gas joint ventures are governed by the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement. As a result, the terms and conditions for each of the SRV Joint Gas joint ventures are substantially the same.

 

The SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement provides that the management of each of the SRV Joint Gas joint ventures will be carried out by a board of directors consisting of four members. We have the right to appoint two members to each board of directors, and MOL has the right to appoint the remaining two members. Additionally, as long as TLT holds at least 1.5% of the shares in an SRV Joint Gas joint venture, it may appoint an observer to attend any meeting of the board of directors of such joint venture.

 

Pursuant to the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement, neither we nor our joint venture partners exercise affirmative control over either of the SRV Joint Gas joint ventures. The approval of a majority of the members of the board of directors of an SRV Joint Gas joint venture is required to consent to any proposed action by such joint venture and, as a result, we are unable to cause such joint venture to act in our best interests over the objection of our joint venture partners. Moreover, a deadlocked dispute that cannot be resolved by the board of directors or the senior executives of the applicable joint venture may result in the transfer of our interest in such joint venture to our joint venture partners or a third party. Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Inherent in Our Business—We are a holding entity that has historically derived a significant amount of our income from equity interests in our joint ventures. Neither we nor our joint venture partners exercise affirmative control over our joint ventures. Accordingly, we cannot require our joint ventures to act in our best interests. Furthermore, our joint venture partners may prevent our joint ventures from taking action that may otherwise be beneficial to us, including making cash distributions to us. A deadlock between us and our joint venture partners could result in our exchanging equity interests in one of our joint ventures for the equity interests in our other joint venture held by our joint venture counterparties or in us or our joint venture partner selling shares in a joint venture to a third party.”

 

Additionally, certain matters relating to our joint venture partners require the unanimous approval of the board of directors of the applicable SRV Joint Gas joint venture, including:

 

  · agreement of any form of time charter to be entered into by such SRV Joint Gas joint venture and any material amendment to such time charter;

 

  · agreement of any form of ship management agreement to be entered into by such SRV Joint Gas joint venture;

 

  · agreement of the terms of any financing of the Neptune or the Cape Ann, as applicable, or any other financing exceeding $5,000,000;

 

  · investments exceeding $2,500,000 for an SRV Joint Gas joint venture or $5,000,000 for both SRV Joint Gas joint ventures;

 

  · amendment or change of the articles of association, business or composition of the board of directors of such SRV Joint Gas joint venture;

 

  · issuance of, or granting of options or rights to subscribe for, shares in such SRV Joint Gas joint venture, issuance of loan capital or convertible securities of such SRV Joint Gas joint venture, alteration of the share capital of such SRV Joint Gas joint venture or formation of any subsidiary;

 

  · granting any security over shares of such SRV Joint Gas joint venture other than in accordance with the applicable security documents;

 

  · acquisition of other companies;

 

  · entering into joint ventures and other long-term cooperation with third parties;

 

  · taking any action in respect of a significant contractual dispute, including commencement and defending any action or settling any dispute; and

 

  · sale of the Neptune or the Cape Ann.

 

68

 

 

Höegh LNG, MOL and TLT made loans to each of the SRV Joint Gas joint ventures, in part to finance the operations of such joint ventures. In connection with the IPO, Höegh LNG’s shareholder loans to each of the joint ventures were transferred to our operating company. For a description of the shareholder loans, please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Joint Ventures Debt—Loans Due to Owners (Shareholder Loans).”

 

Under the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement, the board of directors of an SRV Joint Gas joint venture is responsible for determining the amount of profits to be distributed each financial year. Distributions must first be used to repay the principal of the shareholder loans. Subsequent distributions are permitted but are subject to (i) preexisting financial agreements between such SRV Joint Gas joint venture and its lenders and (ii) prudent maintenance of reserve accounts.

 

Pursuant to the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement, in order for a party to transfer its shares, it must provide written notice and establish a fair price evaluation of the shares proposed to be transferred. Additionally, such party must permit the remaining parties (excluding TLT) to acquire such shares or sell their shares to the proposed transferor at the same price as the proposed transfer.

 

The SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement also contemplates certain events that, upon occurrence and failure to cure, if a cure period is allowed, will give rise to a potential exchange of shares or a liquidation of such joint venture. These events include a party’s failure to make required payments, default in any material duties and/or obligations, insolvency and change of control, pursuant to which such party is acquired by a direct competitor. If one of these events occurs, we and our joint venture partners will attempt to exchange shares so that our operating company, on the one hand, will own 100% of one SRV Joint Gas joint venture, and MOL and TLT, on the other hand, will own 100% of the other SRV Joint Gas joint venture. If such an exchange cannot be agreed upon, then the party not in default, not insolvent or not undergoing a change of control may either purchase the shares and the shareholder loans from the other parties or demand termination of the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement and a liquidation of the applicable SRV Joint Gas joint venture.

 

Until the termination of the SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement, Höegh LNG has agreed to continue to own common units representing a greater than 25% limited partner interest in us in the aggregate. In addition, Höegh LNG will be required to continue to directly or indirectly maintain the ability to control our general partner pursuant to an agreement with MOL.

 

The SRV Joint Gas shareholders’ agreement terminates when one party holds a 100% interest in the SRV Joint Gas joint ventures or a party not in default, not insolvent or not undergoing a change of control elects to terminate the agreement.

 

PT Höegh Shareholders’ Agreement

 

We own a 100% equity interest in Höegh Lampung, which owns a 49% equity interest in PT Höegh (the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung). PT Bahtera, an Indonesian company established in February 2013, owns the remaining 51% equity interest in PT Höegh in order to comply with local Indonesian regulations. However, pursuant the Shareholders’ Agreement, dated March 13, 2013, between Höegh Lampung and PT Bahtera (“the PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement”) and the PT Höegh shareholder loan, we have a 100% economic interest in the PGN FSRU Lampung.

 

The board of directors of PT Höegh manages PT Höegh, whereas the board of commissioners of PT Höegh supervise the operation and management of PT Höegh. Both such board of directors and board of commissioners must consist of between three and five members. Furthermore, Höegh Lampung may appoint three members to each, whereas PT Bahtera may appoint one member. A majority of present members of the board of directors or the board of commissioners, respectively, is required to pass any resolution.

 

Höegh Lampung and PT Bahtera, in their capacity as shareholders, may also convene general meetings to consider resolutions. Resolutions concerning most matters require the approval of two-thirds of the issued shares for passage. However, resolutions concerning filing for bankruptcy, changes of control, disposal of certain assets or the creation of certain encumbrances require the approval of 75% of the issued shares for passage.

 

When deadlock (as defined below) occurs, Höegh Lampung has the right to provide notice to, and subsequently confer with, PT Bahtera to resolve the matters giving rise to deadlock. Deadlock occurs under the PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement if (i) a quorum is not present at a meeting of the board of directors of PT Höegh, the board of commissioners of PT Höegh or the shareholders as a result of the absence of PT Bahtera or (ii) any resolution proposed at a meeting of the board of directors of PT Höegh, the board of commissioners of PT Höegh and/or the shareholders of PT Höegh is approved by the directors appointed by Höegh Lampung, the commissioners appointed by Höegh Lampung or Höegh Lampung, as applicable, but is not passed.

 

The board of directors of PT Höegh is responsible for determining the amount of profits to be distributed each financial year. Once this determination is made, and prior to distributing net cash flow, the shares of Höegh Lampung are entitled to 65% of all dividends and distributions, and the shares of PT Bahtera are entitled to 35% of all dividends and distributions.

 

Höegh Lampung may transfer its shares in PT Höegh to anyone, subject only to the requirement that, upon the request of PT Bahtera, Höegh Lampung procures from the same transferee or an Indonesian entity an offer to purchase PT Bahtera’s shares. Conversely, PT Bahtera may transfer its shares only to an affiliate it wholly owns and only if both Höegh Lampung and any applicable lenders consent to the transfer.

 

At any time or in the event of a default, Höegh Lampung may require PT Bahtera to transfer its shares to Höegh Lampung or any other person it designates. Events of default only apply to PT Bahtera and occur if it fails to pay any amount due and payable under the shareholders’ agreement, becomes insolvent, materially breaches the shareholders’ agreement, becomes controlled by other people or breaches a financing requirement.

 

69

 

 

Additionally, in association with the PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement, PT Imeco Inter Sarana has guaranteed the performance and obligations of PT Bahtera. Furthermore, pursuant to the PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement, Höegh Lampung indemnifies PT Bahtera against liabilities it may suffer as a result of a breach of statutory duty or infringement of laws committed by PT Höegh, a failure by PT Höegh to pay tax, a dispute, litigation or arbitration relating to PT Höegh and all costs, losses, liabilities and claims relating to the PGN FSRU Lampung as a result of environmental damage.

 

The PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement terminates when:

 

  · all of the shareholders agree in writing that the agreement should be terminated;

 

  · all of the issued shares in PT Höegh become directly or indirectly owned by the same person; or

 

  · Höegh Lampung requires the other shareholders to dissolve PT Höegh. PT Imeco Inter Sarana has guaranteed the obligations of PT Bahtera under the equity loan agreement pursuant to a deed of guarantee and indemnity.

 

PT Höegh Shareholder Loan

 

PT Bahtera, as borrower, entered into an equity loan agreement with Höegh Lampung, as lender, the proceeds of which were used to purchase PT Bahtera’s 51% interest in PT Höegh. In connection with this loan, as security, PT Bahtera collaterally assigned its equity interest and any dividends it may receive from PT Höegh to Höegh Lampung for as long as amounts remain outstanding. As a result of the above and the PT Höegh shareholders’ agreement, we will be entitled to all of the net cash flows from PT Höegh, after the payment of management, agency and local representation fees.

 

Employees

 

Other than our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and certain administrative staff in foreign subsidiaries, we do not have other direct employees and rely on the key employees of Höegh Norway who perform services for us pursuant to the administrative services agreement. Höegh Norway and Höegh LNG Management also provide commercial and technical management services to our fleet pursuant to ship management agreements, the Gallant management agreement, the Höegh Grace Services Agreements, a sub-technical support agreement and commercial and administration management agreements. Höegh Maritime Management also provides crew pursuant to a secondment agreement. Our crew may be employed by our or Höegh LNG's subsidiaries. Please read “—Maritime Personnel and Competence Development” and “Item 6.A. Directors and Senior Management.”

 

Competition

 

The FSRU and LNG carrier industries are capital-intensive and operational expertise is critical, which create high barriers to entry. These industries are viewed as an integral part of the LNG industry. A company with a solid track record, knowledge of the market and an experienced, well-trained crew is preferred to a new entrant since the cost and impact of vessel downtime is significant for the customer. Our competitors in the FSRU sector include BW Maritime Pte. Ltd., Dynagas Ltd, Excelerate Energy L.P., Golar LNG Limited, Golar LNG Partners LP and MOL. Certain terminal operators have also ordered FSRUs directly from shipyards for specific projects. Our competitors in the LNG carrier universe is more diverse and, while we compete with this group when operating in LNG carrier mode, few have entered the FSRU market. 

 

Classification, Inspection and Maintenance

 

Every large, commercial seagoing vessel must be “classed” by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of that particular class of vessel as laid down by that society and the applicable flag state. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake to conduct a survey on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.

 

Our FSRUs are “classed” as LNG carriers with the additional class notation REGAS-2 signifying that the regasification installations are designed and approved for continuous operation. To ensure continuous compliance, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull and machinery, including the power plant and any special equipment classed, are required to be performed by a class surveyor. For inspection of the underwater parts and for repairs related to intermediate inspections, vessels generally are drydocked, pursuant to a drydock cycle determined by the classification society and the flag state concerned. However, with FSRUs, certain inspections can be done without drydocking, as special measures are available to inspect the underwater parts. If any defects are found, the class surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by the vessel owner within prescribed time limits. The classification society also undertakes other surveys on request of the flag state and checks that regulations and requirements of that flag state are complied with. These surveys are subject to agreements made for each individual survey and flag state concerned.

 

70

 

 

It is a condition for insurance coverage (i.e., the “seaworthiness” of the vessel) that the vessel is certified as “in class” with a member of the International Association of Classification Societies. Each of our vessels is certified by Det Norske Veritas GL, compliant with the ISM Code, and “in class.”

 

The ship manager carries out inspections of the ships on a regular basis; both at sea and while the vessels are in port, while the classification societies carry out inspections and ship audits to verify conformity with manager’s reports. The results of these inspections, which are conducted both in port and underway, are presented in a report containing recommendations for improvements to the overall condition of the vessel, maintenance, improvements to the safety and environmental protection system and to crew welfare. Among others, based on these evaluations, the ship manager creates and implements a program of continuous maintenance and improvement for its vessel and its systems.

 

Safety, Management of Ship Operations and Administration

 

Safety is a top priority. Our vessels are operated in a manner intended to protect the safety and health of employees, the general public and the environment. We actively manage the risks inherent in our business and are committed to eliminating incidents that threaten safety, such as groundings, collisions, loss of containment and fire. We are also committed to reducing emissions and waste generation. We have established key performance indicators to facilitate regular monitoring of our operational performance. We set targets on an annual basis to drive continuous improvement, and we review performance indicators monthly to determine if remedial action is necessary to reach our targets. Höegh LNG’s shore staff performs a full range of technical, commercial and business development services for us. This staff also provides administrative support to our operations in accounting, finance and cash management, legal, commercial insurance and general office administration and secretarial services.

 

Höegh LNG assists the vessel owners in managing ship operations and maintaining a technical department to monitor and audit ship manager operations. Höegh LNG hold its certifications for and works to the standards of ISO 9001 on Quality Management, ISO 14001 on Environmental Management and OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Advisory Services. Additionally, Höegh LNG hold all compliance documents and permits needed to manage and operate LNG carriers and FSRUs. Through Det Norske Veritas GL, Höegh LNG Management has obtained approval of its safety management systems as being in compliance with the ISM Code, on behalf of the appropriate flag state for the vessels in our fleet, which are flagged in Norway and Indonesia. Our vessels’ safety management certificates are being maintained through ongoing internal audits performed by Höegh LNG Management and through intermediate audits performed by the flag states or recognized classification societies on its behalf. To supplement our operational experience, Höegh LNG provides expertise in various functions critical to our operations. This affords an efficient and cost-effective operation and, pursuant to commercial and administration management agreements with Höegh Norway and a technical information and services agreement with Höegh Norway, access to accounting, finance and cash management, legal, commercial insurance and general office administration and secretarial services. Critical ship management or technical support functions that will be provided by Höegh LNG Management through its various offices around the world include:

 

  · technical management, maintenance and drydocking;

 

  · crew management;

 

  · procurement, purchasing and forwarding logistics;

 

  · marine operations;

 

  · oil major and terminal vetting compliance;

 

  · shipyard supervision;

 

  · insurance; and

 

  · financial services.

 

These functions are supported by onboard and onshore systems for maintenance, inventory, purchasing and budget management. In addition, Höegh LNG's day-to-day focus on cost control will be applied to our operations. To some extent, the uniform design of some of our vessels and the adoption of common equipment standards should also result in operational efficiencies, including with respect to crew training and vessel management, equipment operation and repair and spare parts ordering.

 

71

 

 

Maritime Personnel and Competence Development

 

As of March 31, 2020, entities in the Höegh LNG group employed approximately 622 maritime personnel who serve on our and Höegh LNG’s vessels. The Scandinavian employees are employed by Höegh LNG Management. Non-Scandinavian employees, except for seafarers operating the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Höegh Grace, are employed by Höegh Maritime Management. The seafarers operating the PGN FSRU Lampung are employed by PT Höegh. The seafarers operating the Höegh Grace are employed by Höegh Colombia. Höegh LNG Management and Höegh Maritime Management will employ and train additional maritime personnel to assist us as we grow. Höegh LNG Management, the ISM-certified company, provides technical management services, including all necessary maritime personnel-related services, to the vessel owners pursuant to the ship management agreements. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Support Agreement.”

 

We regard attracting and retaining competent and motivated seagoing personnel as a top priority. Like Höegh LNG, we offer our seafarers competitive employment packages and opportunities for personal and career development, which relates to a philosophy of promoting internally. The officers and crew operating our vessels are employed on individual employment contracts, which are based on International Transport Federation-Approved Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAS) and include conditions determined both by the negotiating parties and the flag states. We believe our relationships with these labor unions are good. Höegh LNG currently is a member of the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association and is participating in some of the collective bargaining agreement negotiations with trade unions.

 

Our commitment to training is fundamental to the development of the highest caliber of seafarers for our marine operations. Höegh LNG Management’s cadet training approach is designed to balance academic learning with hands-on training at sea. Höegh LNG Management uses only recognized training institutions in Norway and other countries. Höegh LNG Management has cadets from Europe, Asia and the United States. We believe that high-quality crew and training policies will play an increasingly important role in distinguishing the preferred LNG-experienced independent shipping companies from those that are newcomers to LNG and lacking in-house experienced staff and established expertise on which to base their customer service and safety operations.

 

We will use in our operations Höegh LNG’s thorough risk management program that includes, among other things, computer-aided risk analysis tools, maintenance and assessment programs, a seafarers competence training program, seafarers workshops and membership in emergency response organizations. We expect to benefit from Höegh LNG’s commitment to safety and environmental protection as certain of its subsidiaries assist us in managing our vessel operations. Höegh LNG Management has been certified under the standards reflected in ISO 9001 for quality assurance and is certified in accordance with the International Marine Organization’s International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention on a fully integrated basis.

 

Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management

 

The operation of FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets has inherent risks. These risks include mechanical failure, personal injury, collision, property loss, vessel or cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries or hostilities. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster, including explosion, spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. We believe that our present insurance coverage is adequate to protect us against the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our business and that we maintain appropriate levels of environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage consistent with standard industry practice. However, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that any specific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.

 

We have obtained hull and machinery insurance on all our vessels against marine risks, which include the risks of damage to our vessels, including claims arising from collisions with other vessels or contact with jetties or wharves, salvage or towing costs and also insure against actual or constructive total loss of any of our vessels. However, our insurance policies contain deductible amounts for which we will be responsible.

 

We have also obtained loss of hire insurance to protect us against loss of income in the event the vessel cannot be employed due to damage that is covered under the terms of our hull and machinery insurance. Under our loss of hire policy, our insurer will pay us the hire rate agreed in respect of each vessel for each day, in excess of 20 deductible days, for the time that the vessel is out of service as a result of damage, for a maximum of 180 days.

 

Protection and indemnity insurance, which covers our third-party legal liabilities in connection with our shipping activities, is provided by a mutual P&I club. This includes third-party liability and other expenses related to the injury or death of crewmembers, passengers and other third-party persons, loss or damage to cargo and other damage to other third-party property, including pollution arising from oil or other substances, and other related costs, including wreck removal.

 

72

 

 

We have war risk insurance for all our vessels cover standard hull and machinery, protection and indemnity and loss of hire, if the event causing the damage is a war peril. In addition, war risk insurance will also compensate the owner for the total loss of the ship caused by intervention of a foreign state power, or if the ship is prevented from leaving a port or a similar limited area.

 

Our current protection and indemnity insurance coverage is limited to $3.1 billion for all liabilities, except for pollution, which is limited to $1 billion per vessel per incident. We are a member of the Gard P&I Club, which is among the 13 P&I clubs that comprise the International Group. Members of the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage, and they have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each P&I club’s liabilities. P&I clubs provide the basic layer of insurance, which is currently $10 million. For members of the International Group, the International Group provides the next layer of insurance, covering liability between $10 million and $90 million. For liabilities above $90 million, the International Group has one of the world’s largest reinsurance contracts, with the maximum liability per accident or occurrence currently set at $3 billion. As a member of the Gard P&I Club, we are subject to a call for additional premiums based on the club’s claims record, as well as the claims record of all other members of the P&I clubs comprising the International Group. However, our P&I club has reinsured the risk of additional premium calls to limit our additional exposure. This reinsurance is subject to a cap, and there is the risk that the full amount of the additional call would not be covered by this reinsurance.

 

The insurers providing the covers for hull and machinery, loss of hire and protection and indemnity have confirmed that they will consider the FSRUs as vessels for the purpose of providing insurance.

 

Environmental and Other Regulation

 

General

 

Governmental and international agencies extensively regulate the carriage, handling, storage and regasification of LNG. These regulations include international conventions and national, state and local laws and regulations in the countries where our vessels now or, in the future, will operate or where our vessels are registered. We cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with these regulations or the impact that these regulations will have on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. Various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies require us to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of our vessels.

 

We believe that we are substantially in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and have all permits, licenses and certificates required for our vessels. In many cases where permits are required from countries to whose jurisdictional waters our vessels have been deployed, the charter party or its customer is responsible for obtaining the permit. A variety of governmental and private entities inspect our vessels on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis. These entities, each of which may have unique requirements and each of which conducts frequent inspections, include classification societies, flag state, or the administration of the country of registry, charterers, terminal operators, LNG producers and local port authorities, such as the U.S. Coast Guard, harbor master or equivalent. Our vessels are subject to inspections on an unscheduled basis and we expect, in the future, they will also be subject to inspection by the applicable governmental and private entities on a scheduled basis. However, future noncompliance or failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require us to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of our vessels.

 

Höegh LNG Management is operating in compliance with the ISO Environmental Standard for the management of the significant environmental aspects associated with the ownership and operation of a fleet of FSRUs and LNG carriers. Höegh Norway received its ISO 9001 certification (Quality Management Systems) in May 2008, which also includes certification of Höegh LNG Management. Höegh Norway also received its certification to the ISO 14001 Environmental Management Standard, which requires that we and Höegh LNG Management commit managerial resources to act on our environmental policy through an effective management system.

 

73

 

 

International Maritime Regulations of FSRUs and LNG Carriers

 

The IMO is the United Nations’ agency that provides international regulations governing shipping and international maritime trade. The requirements contained in the International Safety Management Code (“ISM Code”) promulgated by the IMO govern our operations. Among other requirements, the ISM Code requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a policy for safety and environmental protection setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and also describing procedures for responding to emergencies. Höegh LNG hold a valid Document of Compliance (“DOC”) for each flag in the fleet; Norway (the Neptune, the Cape Ann and the Höegh Gallant), Marshall Islands (the Höegh Grace) and Indonesia (the PGN FRSU Lampung). Each DOC meets the requirements of the IMO.

 

Vessels that transport gas, including FSRUs and LNG carriers, are also subject to regulation under the International Gas Carrier Code (the “IGC Code”), published by the IMO. The IGC Code provides a standard for the safe carriage of LNG and certain other liquid gases by prescribing the design and construction standards of vessels involved in such carriage. Compliance with the IGC Code must be evidenced by a Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk. Each of our vessels is in compliance with the IGC Code, and each of our newbuildings contracts requires that the vessel receive certification of compliance with applicable regulations before she is delivered. Noncompliance with the IGC Code or other applicable IMO regulations may subject a vessel owner or a bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports.

 

The IMO also promulgates ongoing amendments to SOLAS. SOLAS provides rules for the construction of and equipment required for commercial vessels and includes regulations for safe operation. It requires the provision of lifeboats and other life-saving appliances, requires the use of the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System, which is an international radio equipment and watchkeeping standard, afloat and at shore stations, and relates to the Treaty on the Standards of Training and Certification of Watchkeeping Officers (“STCW”), also promulgated by the IMO. Flag states that have ratified SOLAS and STCW generally employ the classification societies, which have incorporated SOLAS and STCW requirements into their class rules, to undertake surveys to confirm compliance.

 

SOLAS and other IMO regulations concerning safety, including those relating to treaties on training of shipboard personnel, lifesaving appliances, radio equipment and the global maritime distress and safety system, are applicable to our operations. Noncompliance with these types of IMO regulations may subject us to increased liability or penalties, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. For example, the U.S. Coast Guard and European Union authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code are prohibited from trading in U.S. and European Union ports.

 

In the wake of increased worldwide security concerns, the IMO amended SOLAS and added the ISPS Code a new chapter to that convention. The objective of the ISPS Code, which came into effect on July 1, 2004, is to detect security threats and take preventive measures against security incidents affecting ships or port facilities. Höegh LNG Management has developed Security Plans and appointed and trained Ship and Office Security Officers, and all of our vessels have been certified to meet the ISPS Code. Please read “—Vessel Security Regulations” for a more detailed discussion about these requirements.

 

The IMO continues to review and introduce new regulations. It is impossible to predict what additional regulations, if any, may be passed by the IMO and what effect, if any, such regulations may have on our operations.

 

74

 

 

Air Emissions

 

The MARPOL Convention is the principal international convention negotiated by the IMO governing marine pollution prevention and response. The MARPOL Convention imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil spills, management of garbage, the handling and disposal of noxious liquids, sewage and air emissions. MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI “Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution” (“Annex VI”) entered into force on May 19, 2005, and applies to all ships, fixed and floating drilling rigs and other floating platforms. Annex VI sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ship exhausts, emissions of volatile compounds from cargo tanks and incineration of specific substances and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone-depleting substances. Annex VI also includes a global cap on sulfur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established in different regions of the world with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. The certification requirements for Annex VI depend on size of the vessel and time of periodical classification survey. Ships weighing more than 400 gross tons and engaged in international voyages involving countries that have ratified the conventions, or ships flying the flag of those countries, are required to have an International Air Pollution Certificate (an “IAPP Certificate”). Annex VI came into force in the United States on January 8, 2009. All of our vessels currently have IAPP Certificates.

 

Annex I to the MARPOL Convention applies to various ships delivered on or after August 1, 2010. It includes requirements for the protected location of the fuel tanks, performance standards for accidental oil fuel outflow, a tank capacity limit and certain other maintenance, inspection and engineering standards. IMO regulations also require owners and operators of vessels to adopt Ship Oil Pollution Emergency Plans. Periodic training and drills for response personnel and for vessels and their crews are required.

 

On July 1, 2010, amendments to Annex VI took effect that impose progressively stricter limitations on sulfur oxide (SOx) emissions from ships. As of January 1, 2012, the cap on the sulfur content of fuel used to power ships was 3.5%, with this cap decreasing over time. Pursuant to Annex VI Regulation 14, for fuels used in the four Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”) for SOx, i.e., the Baltic Sea, North Sea, North America, and United States Caribbean Sea ECAs, the cap settled at 0.1% in January 2015. For fuels used in all non-ECA seas, the cap decreases over time and will settle at 0.5% on January 1, 2020. The 0.5% sulfur cap is generally referred to IMO 2020 and applies absent the installation of expensive sulfur scrubbers to meet reduced emission requirements for sulfur. The European Directive 2005/33/EU, which came into effect January 1, 2010, bans the use of fuel oils containing more than 0.1% sulfur by mass by any merchant vessel while at berth or anchored in any European Union country port. Our FSRUs have achieved compliance with applicable low sulfur fuel requirements through use of gas boil-off and low sulfur marine diesel oil in their diesel generators and boilers.

 

MARPOL Annex VI regulations also establish progressively more stringent standards for emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from new and certain modified marine engines, depending on their date of installation or the date of ship construction. Engine standards required under Annex VI to limit NOx emissions in designated areas are referred to as "Tier III" controls. Pursuant to amendments adopted in April 2014, the Tier III Annex VI requirements for NOx apply to certain newbuild vessels with marine diesel engines constructed on or after January 1, 2016, and that operate in the North American or United States Caribbean Sea NOx Tier III ECAs. And, pursuant to amendments adopted in July 2017 and entered into force on January 1, 2019, the Baltic Sea and North Sea ECAs have been designated as NOx Tier III ECAs, with NOx Tier III Annex VI requirements applying to certain newbuild vessels with marine diesel engines constructed on or after January 1, 2021 that operate in the Baltic Sea or North Sea NOx Tier III ECAs.

 

As discussed in “—U.S. Clean Air Act” below, U.S. air emissions standards are now equivalent to these amended Annex VI requirements. Additional or new conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted in the future and could require the installation of emission control systems. Because our vessels are largely powered by means other than fuel oil we do not anticipate that any emission limits that may be promulgated will require us to incur any material costs for the operation of our vessels but that possibility cannot be eliminated. However, because the marine sector accounts for approximately half of the global fuel oil demand, the impact of the increased demand for compliant low sulfur fuels under IMO 2020 is expected to affect the availability and cost of such fuels and, in turn, increase our costs of operation.

 

75

 

 

Ballast Water Management Convention

 

The IMO has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for oil pollution in international waters and the territorial waters of the signatory to such conventions. For example, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (the “BWM Convention”) in February 2004. The BWM Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, which is being replaced with a requirement for treatment. The BWM Convention was ratified by a sufficient number of countries in September 2016 and the requirement to install ballast water management systems (“BWMS”) on new ships became effective in September 2017. As referenced below, the U.S. Coast Guard issued ballast water management rules on March 23, 2012, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) issued a five-year Vessel General Permit (VGP) in March 2013 that contains numeric technology-based ballast water effluent limitations that apply to certain commercial vessels with ballast water tanks. The VPG program is in the process of being phased out and replaced with National Standards of Performance (NSP) to be developed by EPA and implemented and enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard. From 2016 (or not later than the first intermediate or renewal survey after 2016), only ballast water treatment will be accepted by the BWM Convention. Because the convention has been ratified and entered into force, installation of approved ballast water treatment systems will be required on the Neptune and the Cape Ann in order to call on US ports. The Neptune would require retrofitting to meet the BWMS requirements no later than November 30, 2022 based on the drydock schedule. The Cape Ann was not retrofitted to meet the BWMS requirements during the drydock in 2018 and, therefore, cannot call on US ports. The charterer would cover the cost of complying with the rules and, therefore, makes the decision on whether retrofit to meet the BWMS requirements based upon their plans for the use of the vessels.

 

Bunkers Convention/CLC State Certificate

 

The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution 2001 (the “Bunker Convention”) entered into force in signatory states to the Convention on November 21, 2008. The Bunker Convention provides a liability, compensation and compulsory insurance system for the victims of oil pollution damage caused by spills of bunker oil. The Bunker Convention requires the vessel owner that is liable for pollution damage to pay compensation for such damage (including the cost of preventive measures) caused in the territory, including the territorial sea of a State Party, as well as its economic zone or equivalent area. Registered owners of any seagoing vessel and seaborne craft over 1,000 gross tonnage, of any type whatsoever, and registered in a State Party, or entering or leaving a port in the territory of a State Party, are required to maintain insurance that meets the requirements of the Bunker Convention and to obtain a certificate issued by a State Party attesting that such insurance is in force. The State Party-issued certificate must be carried onboard at all times. The Bunker Convention complements the international regime of liability, limitation and mandatory insurance in place with respect to spills of persistent oils from tankers under the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992 (CLC). The CLC and the Bunker Convention do not overlap; in circumstances where the CLC applies, the Bunker Convention does not apply.

 

P&I clubs in the International Group issue the required Bunkers Convention “Blue Cards” to enable signatory states to issue certificates. All of our vessels have received “Blue Cards” from their P&I club and are in possession of a CLC State-issued certificate attesting that the required insurance coverage is in force.

 

Anti-Fouling Requirements

 

In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on the Control of Harmful Anti-fouling Systems on Ships (the “Anti-fouling Convention”). The Anti-fouling Convention, which entered into force on September 17, 2008, prohibits the use of organotin compounds in coatings applied to vessels to prevent the attachment of mollusks and other sea life to the hulls of vessels and establishes a mechanism to prevent the potential future use of other harmful substances in anti-fouling systems. Vessels of over 400 gross tons engaged in international voyages must obtain an International Anti-fouling System Certificate and undergo a survey before the vessel is put into service or when the anti-fouling systems are altered or replaced. We have obtained Anti-fouling System Certificates for all of our vessels, and we do not believe that actions required to maintain such certificates will have an adverse financial impact on the operation of our vessels.

 

Compliance Enforcement

 

The flag state, as defined by the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, has overall responsibility for the implementation and enforcement of international maritime regulations for all ships granted the right to fly its flag. The “Shipping Industry Guidelines on Flag State Performance” evaluates flag states based on factors such as sufficiency of infrastructure, ratification of international maritime treaties, implementation and enforcement of international maritime regulations, supervision of surveys, casualty investigations and participation at the IMO meetings.

 

76

 

 

As of January 2016, auditing of flag states that are parties to the SOLAS convention is mandatory and are conducted under the IMO Instruments Implementation Code (III Code), which provides guidance on implementation and enforcement of IMO policies by flag states. These audits may lead the various flag states to be more aggressive in their enforcement, which may in turn lead us to incur additional costs.

 

Criminal sanctions including fines and penalties and possible charges against company employees are possible under the laws of various countries. For instance, the European Union directive on ship source pollution imposes criminal sanctions for intentional, reckless or negligent pollution discharges by ships. Implementing laws in the EU could result in criminal liability for pollution from vessels in waters of European countries that adopt implementation legislation. Criminal liability for pollution may result in substantial penalties or fines and increased civil liability claims. Similar consequences are possible for spills in other countries that have enacted similar laws.

 

U.S. Environmental Regulation of FSRUs and LNG Carriers

 

Our vessels operating in U.S. waters now or, in the future, will be subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment. In some cases, these laws and regulations require governmental permits and authorizations before we may conduct certain activities. These environmental laws and regulations may impose substantial penalties for noncompliance and substantial liabilities for pollution that occurs. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties. As with the industry generally, our operations will entail risks in these areas, and compliance with these laws and regulations, which may be subject to frequent revisions and reinterpretation, increases our overall cost of business.

 

Oil Pollution Act and CERCLA

 

OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection and clean-up of oil spills. OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade with the United States or its territories or possessions, or whose vessels operate in the waters of the United States, which include the U.S. territorial waters and the 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone of the United States. CERCLA applies to the discharge of hazardous substances, rather than oil, whether on land or at sea. While OPA 90 and CERCLA would not apply to the discharge of LNG, they may affect us because we carry oil as fuel and lubricants for our engines, and the discharge of these could cause an environmental hazard and subject us to liability under these laws. Under OPA 90, vessel operators, including vessel owners, managers and bareboat or “demise” charterers, are “responsible parties” who are all liable regardless of fault, individually and as a group, for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from oil spills from their vessels. These “responsible parties” would not be liable if the spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war. The other damages aside from clean-up and containment costs are defined broadly to include:

 

  · natural resource damages and related assessment costs;

 

  · real and personal property damages;

 

  · net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, profits or earnings capacity;

 

  · net cost of public services necessitated by a spill response, such as protection from fire, safety or health hazards; and

 

  · loss of subsistence use of natural resources.

 

Effective as of November 12, 2019, the U.S. Coast Guard adjusted the limits of OPA 90 liability to the greater of $2,300 per gross ton or $19,943,400 for any double-hull tanker that is over 3,000 gross tons (subject to possible adjustment for inflation) (relevant to our and Höegh LNG’s vessels). The liability limits are subject to possible further adjustment for inflation in the future. These limits of liability do not apply where the incident is caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulations, or by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. These limits likewise do not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with the substance removal activities. OPA 90 specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters. In some cases, states, which have enacted their own legislation, have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessel owners’ responsibilities under these laws.

 

CERCLA, which also applies to owners and operators of vessels, contains a liability regime similar to OPA 90 and provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource damages for releases of “hazardous substances.” Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million for each release from vessels not carrying hazardous substances as cargo or residue, and $300 per gross ton or $5 million for each release from vessels carrying hazardous substances as cargo or residue. As with OPA 90, these limits of liability do not apply where the incident is caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulations, by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with the substance removal activities. OPA 90 and CERCLA each preserve the right to recover damages under existing law, including maritime tort law. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with OPA 90, CERCLA and all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.

 

77

 

 

OPA 90 requires owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the limit of their potential strict liability under OPA 90/CERCLA. Under the regulations, evidence of financial responsibility may be demonstrated by insurance, surety bond, self-insurance or guaranty. Under OPA 90 regulations, an owner or operator of more than one vessel is required to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility for the entire fleet in an amount equal only to the financial responsibility requirement of the vessel having the greatest maximum liability under OPA 90/CERCLA. We currently maintain U.S. Coast Guard National Pollution Funds Center-issued three-year Certificates of Financial Responsibility supported by guarantees that we purchased from an insurance-based provider for all of our vessels.

 

Compliance with any new requirements of OPA 90 or other laws and regulations relating to oil spill liability may substantially impact our cost of operations or require us to incur additional expenses to comply with any new regulatory initiatives or statutes. Additional legislation or regulation applicable to the operation of our vessels that may be implemented in the future could adversely affect our business and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

 

U.S. Clean Water Act

 

The CWA prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters unless authorized by a permit or exemption, and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under OPA 90 and CERCLA. The EPA has enacted rules governing the regulation of ballast water discharges and other discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels within U.S. waters. The rules historically have required commercial vessels 79 feet in length or longer (other than commercial fishing vessels) (“Regulated Vessels”) to obtain a CWA permit regulating and authorizing such normal discharges. This permit, which the EPA has designated as the Vessel General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels (the “VGP”), incorporated the current U.S. Coast Guard requirements for ballast water management, as well as supplemental ballast water requirements including limits applicable to 26 specific discharge streams, such as deck runoff, bilge water and gray water. For each discharge type, among other things, the VGP establishes effluent limits pertaining to the constituents found in the effluent, including best management practices (the “BMPs”) designed to decrease the amount of constituents entering the waste stream. Unlike land-based discharges, which are deemed acceptable by meeting certain EPA-imposed numerical effluent limits, each of the 26 VGP discharge limits is deemed to be met when a Regulated Vessel carries out the BMPs pertinent to that specific discharge stream. The VGP imposes additional requirements on certain Regulated Vessel types that emit discharges unique to those vessels. Administrative provisions, such as inspection, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements, are also included for all Regulated Vessels.

 

In December 2018, the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act ("VIDA") was signed into law and restructured the EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard programs for regulating incidental discharges from vessels. Rather than requiring CWA permits, the discharges will be regulated under a new CWA Section 312(p) establishing Uniform National Standards for Discharges Incidental to Normal Operation of Vessels. Under VIDA, VGP provisions and existing U.S. Coast Guard regulations will be phased out over a period of approximately four years from December 2018 and replaced with National Standards of Performance (NSPs) to be developed by EPA and implemented and enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard. The scheduled expiration date of the 2013 VGP was December 18, 2018, but under VIDA the provisions of the VGP will remain in place until the new regulations are in place.

 

In addition to the requirements in the VGP (to be replaced by the NSPs established under VIDA), vessel owners and operators must potentially meet 25 sets of state-specific requirements under the CWA’s § 401 certification process. Because the CWA § 401 process allows tribes and states to impose their own requirements for vessels operating within their waters, vessels operating in multiple jurisdictions could face potentially conflicting conditions specific to each jurisdiction that they travel through.

 

U.S. Ballast Water Regulation

 

In the United States, two federal agencies regulate ballast water discharges, the EPA, currently through the VGP, and the U.S. Coast Guard, through approved BWMS. The 2013 VGP includes numeric effluent limits for ballast water expressed as the maximum concentration of living organisms in ballast water, as opposed to the current BMPs requirements. The 2013 VGP also imposes a variety of changes for non-ballast water discharges including more stringent BMPs for discharges of oil-to-sea interfaces in an effort to reduce the toxicity of oil leaked into U.S. waters. For certain existing vessels, the EPA adopted a staggered implementation schedule to require vessels to meet the ballast water effluent limitations by the first drydocking after January 1, 2014 or January 1, 2016, depending on the vessel size. Vessels that are constructed after December 1, 2013 became subject to the ballast water numeric effluent limitations immediately upon the 2013 VGP effective date.

 

78

 

 

On June 20, 2012, the final rule issued by the U.S. Coast Guard establishing standards for the allowable concentration of living organisms in ballast water discharged in U.S. waters and requiring the phase-in of U.S. Coast Guard-approved BWMS went into effect. The final rule adopts ballast water discharge standards for vessels calling on U.S. ports and intending to discharge ballast water equivalent to those set in the BWM Convention. The final rule requires that ballast water discharge have fewer than 10 living organisms per milliliter for organisms between 10 and 50 micrometers in size. For organisms larger than 50 micrometers, the discharge must have fewer than 10 living organisms per cbm of discharge. The rule requires installation of U.S. Coast-Guard approved BWMS by new vessels constructed on or after December 1, 2013 and existing vessels as of their first drydocking after January 1, 2016. The rule also provides for the use of an interim alternative management system ("AMS"), which is a BWMS approved pursuant to the BWM Convention standards by a foreign administration and determined by the U.S. Coast Guard to be at least as effective as ballast water exchange. AMSs can be used for up to five years following the compliance date for a vessel. In February 2016, the U.S. Coast Guard issued a new rule amending the Coast Guard’s ballast water management recordkeeping requirements. Effective February 22, 2016, vessels with ballast tanks operating exclusively on voyages between ports or places within a single Captain of the Port zone must submit an annual report of their ballast water management practices. Further, under the amended requirements, vessels may submit their reports after arrival at the port of destination instead of prior to arrival.

 

As discussed above, under VIDA, existing U.S. Coast Guard ballast water management regulations will be phased out over a period of approximately four years from December 2018 and replaced with NSPs to be developed by EPA and implemented and enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard.

 

U.S. Clean Air Act

 

The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended, requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. Our vessels are subject to vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and conducting other operations in regulated port areas and emission standards for so-called “Category 3” marine diesel engines operating in U.S. waters. The marine diesel engine emission standards are currently limited to new engines beginning with the 2004 model year. On April 30, 2010, the EPA promulgated final emission standards for Category 3 marine diesel engines equivalent to those adopted in the amendments to Annex VI. These emission standards require an 80% reduction in nitrogen dioxides for newly-built engines effective January 1, 2016. Aligned with the Annex VI Regulation 14 requirements, as of January 2015, the EPA emission standards also limit sulfur content in fuel used in Category 3 marine vessels operating in the North American ECA to 1,000 ppm (or 0.1% sulfur by mass). Compliance with EPA standards may cause us to incur costs to install control equipment on our vessels in the future.

 

Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

 

Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, which entered into force in 2005, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Currently, the emissions of greenhouse gases from international transport are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, which entered into force in November 2016, similarly does not cover international shipping. However, to the extent that individual countries increase their regulation of domestic greenhouse gas emissions as a result of the Paris Agreement, we may experience increased regulation of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from regasification activities.

 

The European Commission is pursuing a strategy to integrate maritime emissions into the overall European Union strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In accordance with this strategy, in April 2015 the European Parliament and Council adopted regulations requiring large vessels using European Union ports to monitor, report and verify their carbon dioxide emissions beginning in January 2018. On January 1, 2013, the IMO’s approved mandatory measures to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping went into force. These include amendments to Annex VI for the prevention of air pollution from ships adding a new Chapter 4 to Annex VI on energy efficiency requiring the Energy Efficiency Design Index (the “EEDI”) for new ships, and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (the “SEEMP”) for all ships. Other amendments to Annex VI add new definitions and requirements for survey and certification, including the format for the International Energy Efficiency Certificate. The regulations apply to all ships of 400 gross tonnage and above. The IMO also adopted a mandatory requirement in October 2016 that ships of 5,000 gross tonnage and above record and report their fuel oil consumption. The requirement entered into force in March 2018. These new rules will likely affect the operations of vessels that are registered in countries that are signatories to Annex VI or vessels that call upon ports located within such countries. In May 2019, the MEPC approved for adoption at its April 2020 session further amendments to MARPOL Annex VI intended to significantly strengthen the EEDI “phase 3” requirements. These amendments would accelerate the entry into effect date of phase 3 from 2025 to 2022 for several ship types, including gas carriers, general cargo ships and LNG carriers and require new ships built from that date to be significantly more energy efficient. The MEPC also is looking into the possible introduction of a phase 4 of EEDI requirements. The implementation of the EEDI and the SEEMP standards could cause us to incur additional compliance costs. The IMO has reaffirmed its strong commitment to work to address greenhouse gas emissions from ships engaged in international trade. At the October 2016 Marine Environmental Protection Committee (the "MEPC") session, the IMO adopted a roadmap for developing a comprehensive IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions. In April 2018, the MEPC adopted an initial strategy designed to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases from vessels, including short-term, mid-term and long-term candidate measures with a vision of reducing and phasing out greenhouse gas emissions from vessels as soon as possible in the 21st Century. The mid-term measures under consideration by IMO include the development of a market-based mechanism for greenhouse gas emissions from ships, but it is impossible to predict the likelihood that such a standard might be adopted or the potential impact of this or other IMO measures under consideration on our future operations at this time. According to the “Roadmap” approved by IMO Member States in 2016, the initial strategy is due to be revised by 2023. The EU has indicated that it intends to implement regulation in an effort to limit emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels if such emissions are not regulated through the IMO.

 

79

 

 

In the United States, the EPA issued a final finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health and safety and has promulgated regulations that regulate the emission of greenhouse gases, but not from ships. The EPA may decide in the future to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ships and has already been petitioned by the California Attorney General to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from oceangoing vessels. Other federal and state regulations relating to the control of greenhouse gas emissions may follow, including climate change initiatives that have been considered from time to time by the U.S. Congress. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, the European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level, that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict with certainty at this time. In addition, even without such regulation, our business may be indirectly affected to the extent that climate change results in sea level changes or more intense weather events.

 

Vessel Security Regulations

 

Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Act of 2002 (the “MTSA”) came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter became effective in July 2004 and imposed various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the ISPS Code. The ISPS Code is designed to protect ports and international shipping against terrorism. Since July 1, 2004, to trade internationally, a vessel must obtain an International Ship Security Certificate (an “ISSC”) from a recognized security organization approved by the vessel’s flag state.

 

Among the various requirements are:

 

  · onboard installation of automatic identification systems to provide a means for the automatic transmission of safety-related information from among similarly equipped ships and shore stations, including information on a ship’s identity, position, course, speed and navigational status;

 

  · onboard installation of ship security alert systems, which do not sound on the vessel but only alert the authorities onshore;

 

  · the development of vessel security plans;

 

  · ship identification number to be permanently marked on a vessel’s hull;

 

  · a continuous synopsis record kept onboard showing a vessel’s history, including the name of the ship, the state whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the date on which the ship was registered with that state, the ship’s identification number, the port at which the ship is registered and the name of the registered owner(s) and their registered address; and

 

  · compliance with flag state security certification requirements.

 

The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from obtaining U.S. Coast Guard-approved MTSA vessel security plans provided such vessels have onboard an ISSC that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code.

 

Our ship manager has developed Security Plans and appointed and trained Ship and Office Security Officers, and each of the vessels in our fleet complies with the requirements of the ISPS Code, SOLAS and the MTSA.

 

80

 

 

Other Regulations

 

International Conventions

 

Our vessels may also become subject to the 2010 HNS Convention, if it is adopted by a sufficient number of countries. At least 12 states must ratify or accede to the 2010 HNS Protocol for it to enter into effect. In July 2019, South Africa became the 5th state to ratify the protocol. At least 7 more states must ratify or accede to the protocol for it to enter into effect. The Convention creates a regime of liability and compensation for damage from hazardous and noxious substances (“HNS”), including liquefied gases. The 2010 HNS Convention sets up a two-tier system of compensation composed of compulsory insurance taken out by vessel owners and an HNS Fund which comes into play when the insurance is insufficient to satisfy a claim or does not cover the incident. Under the 2010 HNS Convention, if damage is caused by bulk HNS, claims for compensation will first be sought from the vessel owner up to a maximum of 100 million from the supplementary foreign exchange reserve assets defined and maintained by the International Monetary Fund called Special Drawing Rights (“SDR”). If the damage is caused by packaged HNS or by both bulk and packaged HNS, the maximum liability is 115 million SDR. Once the limit is reached, compensation will be paid from the HNS Fund up to a maximum of 250 million SDR. The 2010 HNS Convention has not been ratified by a sufficient number of countries to enter into force, and we cannot estimate the costs that may be needed to comply with any such requirements that may be adopted with any certainty at this time.

 

Indonesia Environmental Regulation of FSRUs

 

In Indonesia, the environmental requirements of downstream business activity for the gas industry are regulated and supervised by the Government of Indonesia and controlled through business and technical licenses issued by the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources and BPH Migas, the regulatory agency for downstream oil and gas activity. Under Law 22, the Government of Indonesia has the exclusive rights to gas exploitation and activities carried out by private entities based on government-issued licenses. Companies engaging in downstream activities must comply with environmental management and occupational health and safety provisions related to operations. This includes obtaining environmental licenses and conducting environmental monitoring and reporting for activities that may have an impact on the environment such as the environmental impact assessment required under Law No. 32 of 2009 regarding Environmental Protection and Management. Failure to comply with these laws and obtain the necessary business and technical licenses may subject us to sanctions including suspension and/or freezing of the business and responsibility for all damages arising from any violation. We believe we are currently in compliance with these laws and hold all applicable licenses. However, these laws are subject to change, and we cannot predict any future changes in the regulatory environment, which could result in increased costs to our business.

 

Colombia Environmental Regulation of FSRUs

 

While Colombia has a comprehensive suite of environmental regulations, there are currently no regulatory requirements specific to activities associated with the importation of LNG. In 2011, the Energy and Gas Regulatory Commission passed Resolution 106, which recognized that Colombia’s demand for natural gas could be met through LNG imports and proposed technical requirements for, among other things, the construction of LNG import plants. The Mines and Energy Ministry in 2015 subsequently proposed a resolution regarding those technical requirements, but it has not yet passed the resolution. In the meantime, we have obtained a port concession from the Colombian National Infrastructure Agency, as well as an environmental license from the National Authority for Environmental Licenses, each with respect to the FSRU Höegh Grace. Our operations in Colombia may also be subject to other permits to be issued by various entities, including the General Maritime Director of the Ministry of Defense.

 

We are unable to predict the impacts that any Colombian regulations will have on our business. The adoption of national and local laws or regulations and additional international treaties or conventions could materially increase our costs of operation and materially impact our ability to operate in Colombian waters.

 

Turkey Environmental Regulation of FSRUs

 

In Turkey, LNG import operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations promulgated by the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning. All LNG import facilities must obtain a positive assessment of the project’s environmental impacts from the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning. Thereafter, LNG import facilities must also obtain other permits and approvals, including an environmental permit. Under current Turkish environmental laws and regulations, governmental authorities may suspend or terminate non-compliant operations, levy monetary penalties and require non-compliant entities to bear the cost of related remediation programs. Turkish environmental and criminal laws allow private actions and impose liability for damages arising from non-compliant operations, as well as criminal penalties (such as imprisonment and monetary fines) for certain types of violations. We believe we are currently in compliance with these laws and hold all applicable licenses. However, these laws and permits are subject to change, and we cannot predict any future changes in the regulatory environment, which could result in increased costs to our business or restrictions on our operations.

 

81

 

 

Egyptian Environmental Regulation of FSRUs

 

The Egyptian Authority for Maritime Safety regulates vessels in the national waters of Egypt. Emissions associated with the operation of the vessel may also be regulated by other agencies. To the extent that a change in law in Egypt (other than future laws requiring changes to the structure, machinery, boilers, appurtenances or spare parts of the vessel) has an identifiable financial impact on the economics of a charter, the terms of the charter typically would require the owner and charterer to meet to discuss in good faith and agree upon the necessary actions and changes to offset such impact.

 

Indian Environmental Regulation of FSRUs

 

Under Indian law, the Government of India’s Ministry of Environment and Forest regulates FRSUs and LNG imports. Section 3(2)(v) of India’s Environment Protection Act, 1986, obligates industries, operations or processes to be carried out subject to certain safeguards, including maintaining standards of quality of air, water or soil, complying with maximum allowable limits of concentration of environment pollutants, and abiding by procedures for handling hazardous substances. FRSU and LNG import operations in India require a one-time Consent to Establish and a Consent to Operate, renewed on a periodic basis, from the applicable State Pollution Control Board under Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (“Air Act”) and Section 25 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (“Water Act”).

 

In addition to the consents required under the Air Act and the Water Act, an authorization from the applicable State Pollution Control Board is required under the Hazardous Waste Management Rules 2008 for the Generation, Treatment, Storage, Transportation and Disposal of Hazardous Waste. There are also certain business specific approvals required by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to be obtained before operating any project in India. Without obtaining the necessary approvals, an establishment will not be allowed to operate in India.

 

In-House Inspections

 

Höegh LNG Management, our ship manager, regularly inspects our vessels for compliance with laws of host countries; both at sea and while in port. We also inspect and audit our vessels regularly to verify conformity with manager’s reports. These inspections result in a report containing recommendations for improvements to the overall condition of the vessel, maintenance, safety and crew welfare. Based in part on these evaluations, we create and implement a program of continual maintenance for our vessels and their systems.

 

Taxation of the Partnership 

     

The following are discussions of the material tax considerations applicable to us under U.S., Marshall Islands, Norway, Singapore, Indonesia, Cyprus, Egypt, Columbia and Indian law, respectively. These discussions are based upon provisions of the applicable tax law as in effect on the date of this Annual Report, regulations and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in these authorities or their interpretation may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below.

 

United States Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us. This discussion is based upon provisions of the Code as in effect on the date of this Annual Report, existing final and temporary Treasury Regulations thereunder, and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in these authorities or their interpretation may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Election to be Treated as a Corporation

 

We have elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, we are subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent we earn income from U.S. sources or income that is treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, unless such income is exempt from tax under Section 883 of the Code or otherwise.

 

Taxation of Operating Income

 

Substantially all of our gross income is attributable, and we expect it will continue to be attributable, to the transportation, regasification and storage of LNG. Gross income generated from regasification and storage of LNG outside of the United States generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax, and gross income generated from such activities in the United States generally is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis plus a branch profits tax as described below. Gross income that is attributable to transportation that either begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States (“U.S. Source International Transportation Income”) is considered to be 50.0% derived from sources within the United States and may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a gross basis as described below. Gross income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States (“U.S. Source Domestic Transportation Income”) is considered to be 100.0% derived from sources within the United States and generally is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis plus a branch profits tax as described below. Gross income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. destinations will be considered to be 100.0% derived from sources outside the United States and generally is not subject to U.S. federal income tax.

 

We are not permitted by law to engage in transportation that gives rise to U.S. Source Domestic Transportation Income, and we currently do not anticipate providing any regasification or storage services within the territorial seas of the United States. However, certain of our activities give rise to U.S. Source International Transportation Income, and future expansion of our operations could result in an increase in the amount of U.S. Source International Transportation Income, all of which could be subject to U.S. federal income taxation unless an exemption from U.S. taxation applies under Section 883 of the Code (the “Section 883 Exemption”).

 

82

 

 

The Section 883 Exemption

 

In general, the Section 883 Exemption provides that if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the requirements of Section 883 of the Code and Treasury Regulations thereunder (the “Section 883 Regulations”), it will not be subject to the net basis and branch profits taxes or the 4.0% gross basis tax described below on the U.S. source portion of its U.S. Source International Transportation Income. The Section 883 Exemption applies only to U.S. Source International Transportation Income and does not apply to U.S. Source Domestic Transportation Income. As discussed below, we believe that based on our current ownership structure, the Section 883 Exemption applies and we are not subject to U.S. federal income tax on our U.S. Source International Transportation Income.

 

We qualify for the Section 883 Exemption for a particular taxable year if, among other things, we meet the following three requirements:

 

  · we are organized in a jurisdiction outside the United States that grants an equivalent exemption from tax to corporations organized in the United States with respect to the types of U.S. Source International Transportation Income that we earn (an “Equivalent Exemption”);

 

  · we satisfy the Publicly Traded Test (as described below) or the Qualified Shareholder Stock Ownership Test (as described below); and

 

  · we meet certain substantiation, reporting and other requirements.

 

In order for a non-U.S. corporation to meet the Publicly Traded Test, its equity interests must be “primarily traded” and “regularly traded” on an established securities market either in the United States or in a jurisdiction outside the United States that grants an Equivalent Exemption. The Section 883 Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that equity interests in a non-U.S. corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an established securities market in a given country if, with respect to the class or classes of equity relied upon to meet the “regularly traded” requirement described below, the number of units of each such class that are traded during any taxable year on all established securities markets in that country exceeds the number of units in such class that are traded during that year on established securities markets in any other single country.

 

Equity interests in a non-U.S. corporation will be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market under the Section 883 Regulations if one or more classes of such equity interests that, in the aggregate, represent more than 50.0% of the combined vote and value of all outstanding equity interests in the non-U.S. corporation satisfy certain listing and trading volume requirements. These listing and trading volume requirements will be satisfied with respect to a class of equity interests if trades in such class are effected, other than in de minimis quantities, on an established securities market on at least 60 days during the taxable year and the aggregate number of units in such class that are traded on such established securities market during the taxable year is at least 10.0% of the average number of units outstanding in that class during the taxable year (with special rules for short taxable years). In addition, a class of equity interests will be considered to satisfy these listing and trading volume requirements if the equity interests in such class are traded during the taxable year on an established securities market in the United States and are “regularly quoted by dealers making a market” in such class (within the meaning of the Section 883 Regulations).

 

Even if a class of equity interests satisfies the foregoing requirements, and thus generally would be treated as “regularly traded” on an established securities market, an exception may apply to cause the class to fail the regularly traded test for a taxable year if, for more than half of the number of days during the taxable year, one or more 5.0% unitholders (i.e., unitholders owning, actually or constructively, at least 5.0% of the vote and value of that class) own in the aggregate 50.0% or more of the vote and value of the class (the “Closely Held Block Exception”). For purposes of identifying its 5.0% unitholders, a non-U.S. corporation is entitled to rely on Schedule 13D and Schedule 13G filings with the SEC. In addition, an investment company that is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, is not treated as a 5.0% unitholder. The Closely Held Block Exception does not apply to a class of units, however, in the event the corporation can establish that a sufficient proportion of such 5.0% unitholders are Qualified Shareholders (as defined below) so as to preclude other persons who are 5.0% unitholders from owning 50.0% or more of the value of that class for more than half the days during the taxable year.

 

As set forth above, as an alternative to satisfying the Publicly Traded Test, a non-U.S. corporation may qualify for the Section 883 Exemption by satisfying the Qualified Shareholder Stock Ownership Test. A corporation generally will satisfy the Qualified Shareholder Stock Ownership Test if more than 50.0% of the value of its outstanding equity interests is owned, or treated as owned after applying certain attribution rules, for at least half of the number of days in the taxable year by:

 

  · individual residents of jurisdictions that grant an Equivalent Exemption;

 

  · non-U.S. corporations organized in jurisdictions that grant an Equivalent Exemption and that meet the Publicly Traded Test; or

 

  · certain other qualified persons described in the Section 883 Regulations (which we refer to collectively as Qualified Shareholders).

 

83

 

We believe that we currently satisfy all of the requirements for the Section 883 Exemption, and we expect that we will continue to satisfy such requirements. First, we are organized under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The U.S. Treasury Department has recognized the Republic of the Marshall Islands as a jurisdiction that grants an Equivalent Exemption with respect to the type of U.S. Source International Transportation Income we earn and expect to earn in the future. Consequently, our U.S. Source International Transportation Income (including for this purpose, any such income earned by our joint ventures and subsidiaries) should be exempt from U.S. federal income taxation provided we meet either the Publicly Traded Test or the Qualified Shareholder Stock Ownership Test and we satisfy certain substantiation, reporting and other requirements.

 

Our common units and our Series A preferred units are traded only on the New York Stock Exchange, which is considered to be an established securities market. Thus, the number of our common units and our Series A preferred units that is traded on the New York Stock Exchange exceeds the number of each class that is traded on any other securities market, and this is not expected to change. Therefore, we believe that our equity interests are “primarily traded” on an established securities market for purposes of the Publicly Traded Test. Although the matter is not free from doubt, based upon our analysis of our current and expected cash flow and distributions on our outstanding equity interests, we believe that (i) our common units and Series A preferred units represent more than 50.0% of the total value of all of our outstanding equity interests and (ii) our common units and our Series A preferred units represent more than 50.0% of the total combined voting power of our equity interests. In addition, we believe that our common units and our Series A preferred units each currently satisfy, and expect that our common units and our Series A preferred units each will continue to satisfy, the listing and trading volume requirements described previously. Therefore, we believe that our equity interests are “primarily traded” on an established securities market for purposes of the Publicly Traded Test.

 

Further, our partnership agreement provides that any person or group that beneficially owns more than 4.9% of any class of our units then outstanding generally will be treated as owning only 4.9% of such units for purposes of voting for directors. There can be no assurance that this limitation will be effective to eliminate the possibility that we will have any 5.0% unitholders for purposes of the Closely Held Block Exception. Nevertheless, we believe that our common units have not lost eligibility for the Section 883 Exemption as a result of the Closely Held Block Exception based upon the current ownership of our common units. Thus, although the matter is not free from doubt and is based upon our belief and expectations regarding our satisfaction of the factual requirements described above, we believe that we satisfied the Publicly Traded Test for 2019, and we expect that we will satisfy the Publicly Traded Test for the current and all future taxable years.

 

The legal conclusions described above are based upon legal authorities that do not expressly contemplate an organizational structure such as ours. In particular, although we have elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we are organized as a limited partnership under Marshall Islands law. Accordingly, while we believe that, assuming the factual requirements described above are satisfied, our common units and Series A preferred units should be considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market and that we satisfy the requirements of the Section 883 Exemption, it is possible that the IRS would assert that our common units do not meet the “regularly traded” test. In addition, as described previously, our ability to satisfy the Publicly Traded Test depends upon factual matters that are subject to change. Should any of the factual requirements described above fail to be satisfied, we may not be able to satisfy the Publicly Traded Test. Furthermore, our board of directors could determine that it is in our best interests to take an action that would result in our not being able to satisfy the Publicly Traded Test in the future. Please read “—The Net Basis and Branch Profits Tax” and “—The 4.0% Gross Basis Tax” below for a discussion of the tax consequences in the event we do not qualify for the Section 883 Exemption.

 

The Net Basis Tax and Branch Profits Tax

 

If we earn U.S. Source International Transportation Income and the Section 883 Exemption does not apply, the U.S. source portion of such income would be treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States (“Effectively Connected Income”) if we have a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of U.S. Source International Transportation Income and substantially all of our U.S. Source International Transportation Income is attributable to regularly scheduled transportation or, in the case of vessel leasing income, is attributable to a fixed place of business in the United States. In addition, if we earn income from regasification or storage of LNG within the territorial seas of the United States, such income would be treated as Effectively Connected Income. Based on our current operations, substantially all of our potential U.S. Source International Transportation Income is not attributable to regularly scheduled transportation and is not received pursuant to vessel leasing, and none of our regasification or storage activities occur within the territorial seas of the United States. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of our U.S. Source International Transportation Income or income earned from regasification or storage activities will be treated as Effectively Connected Income. However, there is no assurance that we will not earn income pursuant to regularly scheduled transportation or vessel leasing attributable to a fixed place of business in the United States or earn income from regasification or storage activities within the territorial seas of the United States, in the future, which would result in such income being treated as Effectively Connected Income.

 

84

 

 

Any income we earn that is treated as Effectively Connected Income, net of applicable deductions, would be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax (currently imposed at a rate of 21.0%). In addition, a 30.0% branch profits tax could be imposed on the after-tax amount of any income we earn that is treated as Effectively Connected Income, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed paid by us in connection with the conduct of our U.S. trade or business.

 

Taxation of Gain from the Sale of a Vessel

 

On the sale of a vessel that has produced Effectively Connected Income, we could be subject to the net basis U.S. federal corporate income tax as well as branch profits tax with respect to the gain recognized up to the amount of certain prior deductions for depreciation that reduced Effectively Connected Income. Otherwise, we would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain realized on the sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under U.S. federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by us will be considered to occur outside of the United States.

 

The 4.0% Gross Basis Tax

 

If the Section 883 Exemption does not apply and the net basis tax does not apply, we would be subject to a 4.0% U.S. federal income tax on the U.S. source portion of our gross U.S. Source International Transportation Income, without benefit of deductions. Under the sourcing rules described above under “—Taxation of Operating Income,” 50.0% of our U.S. Source International Transportation Income would be treated as being derived from U.S. sources.

 

Marshall Islands Taxation

 

Because we, our operating subsidiary and our controlled affiliates do not, and do not expect to conduct business, transactions or operations in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, neither we nor our controlled affiliates will be subject to income, capital gains, profits or other taxation under current Marshall Islands law, other than taxes, fines or fees due to (i) the incorporation, dissolution, continued existence, merger, domestication (or similar concepts) of legal entities registered in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, (ii) filing certificates (such as certificates of incumbency, merger, or redomiciliation) with the Marshall Islands registrar, (iii) obtaining certificates of good standing from, or certified copies of documents filed with, the Marshall Islands registrar, (iv) compliance with Marshall Islands law concerning books and records and vessel ownership, such as tonnage tax, or (v) non-compliance with economic substance requirements or with requests made by the Marshall Islands Registrar of Corporations relating to our books and records and the books and records of our subsidiaries. As a result, distributions by our operating subsidiaries and our controlled affiliates to us will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation.

 

Norway Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Norwegian tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current tax authority practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in this legislation and practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Norwegian tax considerations applicable to us.

 

As we do not have any Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries, there is no Norwegian taxation by virtue of being resident in Norway. We, our operating company, our joint ventures and our non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries do not contemplate to hold board meetings in Norway, to have a board consisting of a majority of Norwegian residents or to pass resolutions in any board with a majority of Norwegian resident directors.

 

Taxation of the Partnership and Non-Norwegian Incorporated Subsidiaries.

 

As we are a partnership and do not expect to be managed and controlled within Norway nor carrying out business in Norway, we do not expect to be subject to taxation in Norway. While certain of our joint ventures and non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries will enter into agreements with Höegh Norway and Höegh LNG Management, Norwegian incorporated and resident companies, for the provision of certain management and administrative services, we believe that the terms of these agreements will not result in us, our operating company or any of our non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries being treated as being resident in Norway or having a permanent establishment or carrying out business in Norway. As a consequence, we expect that neither our profits, the profits of our operating company or any of our joint ventures and non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries will be subject to Norwegian corporation tax. We do not currently anticipate that any of our joint ventures and non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries will be controlled or managed in Norway or have a permanent establishment or otherwise carry on business in Norway. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that any of our joint ventures and non-Norwegian incorporated subsidiaries will be subject to Norwegian corporation tax.

 

85

 

 

Singapore Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Singapore tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Singapore tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Taxation of the Partnership and non-Singapore Incorporated Subsidiaries.

 

As we are a limited partnership and do not expect to be managed and controlled within Singapore or carry on a trade or business in Singapore, we do not expect to be subject to taxation in Singapore. Similarly, as the non-Singapore incorporated subsidiaries are not managed and controlled within Singapore or carry on a trade or business in Singapore, the non-Singapore incorporated subsidiaries should not be subject to taxation in Singapore.

 

Taxation of the Singapore Incorporated Subsidiary.

 

Höegh Lampung is incorporated in Singapore, and we anticipate that it will be centrally managed and controlled in Singapore. As a result, Höegh Lampung will be regarded for the purposes of Singapore tax as being resident in Singapore and liable to Singapore corporate income tax on income accrued in or derived from Singapore or income received in Singapore from outside Singapore in respect of (i) gains or profits from any trade or business, (ii) income from investment such as dividends, interest and rental, (iii) royalties, premiums and any other profits from property and (iv) other gains of an income nature. The generally applicable rate of Singapore corporation tax is 17%. Höegh Lampung will generally be liable to tax at this rate on its income, profits and gains after deducting revenue expenses incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business being undertaken.

 

Under Section 12(6) of the Income Tax Act, Chapter 134 of Singapore (“ITA”), the following payments are deemed to be derived from Singapore:

 

  · any interest, commission, fee or any other payment in connection with any loan or indebtedness or with any arrangement, management, guarantee, or service relating to any loan or indebtedness which is:

 

  · borne, directly or indirectly, by a person resident in Singapore or a permanent establishment in Singapore (except in respect of any business carried on outside Singapore through a permanent establishment outside Singapore or any immovable property situated outside Singapore); or

 

  · deductible against any income accruing in or derived from Singapore; or

 

  · any income derived from loans where the funds provided by such loans are brought into or used in Singapore.

 

Payments falling within the two bullet points above and made by Höegh Lampung, would fall within Section 12(6) of the ITA. Unless exempted, such payments, where made to a person not known to Höegh Lampung to be a tax resident in Singapore, are generally subject to withholding tax in Singapore.

 

Indonesian Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Indonesia tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current Directorate General of Taxes of Indonesia (“DGT”) practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Indonesia tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Taxation of the Partnership and non-Indonesian Incorporated Subsidiaries

 

As we are a limited partnership and do not expect to be managed and controlled or domiciled within Indonesia or conduct business or carry out activities through a permanent establishment in Indonesia, we do not expect to be subject to taxation in the Indonesia.

 

86

 

 

We do not currently anticipate that any of our other non-Indonesian incorporated subsidiaries will be controlled, managed or domiciled in Indonesia or conduct business or carry out activities through a permanent establishment in Indonesia. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that any of our non-Indonesian incorporated subsidiaries will be subject to Indonesian corporate income tax.

 

Taxation of Operating Income

 

PT Höegh’s main business activity in Indonesia is to provide the lease, operation, and maintenance of the PGN FSRU Lampung to PGN LNG. As PT Höegh was established in Indonesia, it is a resident taxpayer. Under Law No. 36 Year 2008 regarding Income Tax (“Income Tax Law” or “ITL”), PT Höegh is subject to Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”) of 25% on taxable profit derived from the business activities performed. Therefore, any income generated by PT Höegh from PGN LNG in regard to the lease, operation, and maintenance of the PGN FSRU Lampung is subject to CIT of 25% (after deductions for allowable expenses in accordance with the ITL provisions).

 

Taxable income is calculated on the basis of accounting profits as modified by certain tax adjustments. Any tax loss can be carried forward for a maximum period of five years. Loss carry back is not permitted in Indonesia.

 

For tax purposes, costs incurred in relation to the acquisition of fixed assets are deductible (through depreciation) over a useful life of four to 20 years depending on the type of the fixed assets. In this regard, although the commercial useful life of a fixed asset is more than 20 years, such asset shall only be depreciated for a maximum of 20 years for tax purposes.

 

Depreciation commences in the month when expenditures are incurred. The depreciation can be calculated either using the straight line method or double declining balance method.

 

The ITL taxes the world-wide income of Indonesian tax residents; however, we do not anticipate that PT Höegh will generate income outside of Indonesia.

 

Taxation of the Sale of the PGN FSRU Lampung to PGN LNG

 

PGN LNG was granted an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung from PT Höegh at specified prices as set out in the time charter for PGN FSRU Lampung. Any gain arising from the sale of the FSRU (i.e. sales price less tax book value) will be subject to CIT at the rate of 25% to PT Höegh.

  

Withholding Taxes (“WHT”)

 

PT Höegh is required to withhold:

 

  · WHT under Article 23/26 of the ITL at the following rates:

 

  · 2% on payments for rent (other than land and/or building), fees for technical, management and other services to another resident taxpayer;

 

  · 15% on payments of dividends, interest and royalties to another resident taxpayer;

 

  · 20% (or a reduced tax treaty rate) on payments relating to services, dividends, interest and royalties to a non-resident taxpayer. The reduced tax treaty rate is also subject to the availability of the Certificate of Domicile of the counter party in the form prescribed by the Indonesian tax regulations and fulfilment of Indonesian Tax Treaty use requirements.

 

  · WHT under Article 4(2) of the ITL at the rate of 10% for rent of land and/or buildings and at 3% to 6% on payments for construction services to another resident taxpayer;

 

  · WHT under Article 15 of the ITL at the rate of 1.2% on payments related to domestic shipping services.

 

Salaries and wages paid to resident employees are subject to Employee Income Tax (“EIT”) under Article 21 of the ITL at progressive rates of maximum 30%. Salaries paid to non-resident employees are subject to EIT under Article 26 of the ITL at the rate of 20% from the gross salary amount. PT Höegh is required to withhold and remit EIT on monthly basis.

 

Value Added Tax (“VAT”)

 

Any fees charged by PT Höegh for services provided to PGN LNG are subject to VAT at 10%. Such VAT on revenue is called Output VAT. The Output VAT can be offset with the VAT that PT Höegh pays for the procurement of goods and/or services (“Input VAT”). If the Output VAT exceeds the Input VAT in a particular month, the balance is required to be settled by PT Höegh. However, if the Input VAT exceeds the Output VAT, the VAT overpayment can be carried forward to the following month or a refund can be requested at year end. A VAT refund request will automatically trigger a tax audit.

 

87

 

 

VAT of 10% would also be charged on the sale of the FSRU to PGN LNG, if applicable.

 

Debt to Equity Ratio Requirement

 

Under Minister of Finance (“MoF”) Regulation No. 169/PMK.010/2015 (“MoF -169”) Indonesian corporate taxpayers are subject to a limit in claiming financing costs as tax deduction where their debt to equity ratio exceeds 4:1. PMK 169 was effective from fiscal year 2016 onwards.

 

MoF-169 stipulates that debt shall include long-term debt, short-term debt and trade payables which bear interest. Equity includes all items recorded under the equity section of the balance sheet based on the prevailing accounting standards and interest-free loans from related parties.

 

In case the balance of equity is zero or negative, no financing costs of the taxpayer can be deducted. In case the actual ratio of the debt and equity exceeds 4:1 the deductible financing costs must be adjusted to an allowable amount based on the 4:1 ratio.

 

Certain industries, including the infrastructure industry, are exempted from the debt to equity ratio requirements. The infrastructure industry is not defined in MoF-169, and there has been no further guidance issued by the DGT regarding this matter. The DGT issued Regulation No. PER-25/PJ/2017 (“PER-25”) in 2017 which provides information in relation to the implementation of MoF-169. PER-25 provides guidance that interest is not deductible on any debt for which the existence cannot be formally verified and specifies reporting requirements on the corporate income tax return to comply with the regulation.

 

Land and Building Tax (“Property tax”)

 

On December 10, 2019 the MoF issued regulation No. 186/PMK.03/2019 (“MoF-186”) regarding the following changes in relation to the application of Property tax. These changes are:

an updated classification of “Tax Objects”; and
new procedures to determine the Sale Value of these Tax Objects

 

The regulation is effective from January 1, 2020.

 

Under MoF-186, the definition of “building” extends to technical constructions planted or attached permanently on “land” within Indonesia’s territorial waters. This includes pipelines, cable networks, toll roads and, most importantly, industry-relevant storage and processing facilities (i.e. Floating storage and offloading vessels (“FSOs”), Floating production system (“FPS”), Floating storage unit (“FSUs”), Floating, production, storage and offloading vessels (“FPSOs”) and FSRUs).

 

In addition, while the DGT considers an FSRU as a building for Property tax purposes, it continues to be considered a non-building for CIT purposes. Therefore, the income from FSRU operations is still subject to a 25% income tax on taxable income, rather than a 10% income tax on rental income from a building.

 

Cyprus Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Cyprus tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current tax practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Cyprus tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Taxation of profits and deduction for losses

 

Höegh Cyprus, acting through its Egypt Branch, provides a FSRU on a time charter to EgyptCo. The time charter activities are operated in the Egypt Branch.

 

Cyprus tax law exempts foreign branch profits from Cyprus corporate income tax, subject to certain exceptions. We have received a ruling from the Cyprus tax authorities confirming that this exemption applies for the profits in the Egypt Branch.

 

88

 

 

Any tax losses incurred by the Egypt Branch can be used as a deduction against the taxable income of Höegh Cyprus for the same year. Any unutilized branch tax losses can be carried forward. A claw-back applies for previous losses utilized in the year in which the Egypt Branch becomes profitable. Losses clawed back through taxation of equal profits are restricted to losses offset with profits/losses being carried forward and exclude expired losses (i.e. exclude losses which were carried forward but not offset with profits due to the lapse of the five year carry forward period from the date the losses were incurred).

 

Höegh Cyprus may elect, but has not to date made the election, to be taxed on foreign permanent establishment’s (“PE”) profits. If Höegh Cyprus made this election, it could claim a foreign tax credit ("FTC") for taxes incurred on foreign PE profits, even when an applicable tax treaty is not in force.

 

WHT

 

Cyprus does not levy any withholding taxes on interest and dividend payments to non-Cyprus tax residents (whether legal persons or individuals). As such, dividends and interest payments made by Höegh Cyprus should not be subject to WHT.

 

VAT

 

As per the ruling obtained with the Cyprus Tax Authority, Höegh Cyprus does not have an obligation to register for VAT purposes in Cyprus. Any income generated by Höegh Cyprus through the Egypt Branch from the time charter or any services (ship management, commercial management, crew management, etc.) received by the Egypt Branch will not trigger an obligation to account for Cypriot VAT.

 

Egyptian Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Egypt tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Egypt tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Taxation of Höegh Cyprus in Egypt – CIT and free zone

 

The Egypt Branch is registered as a legal entity in Egypt in the Suez Public Free Zone. The Egypt Branch is subject to a 1% free zone fee on the revenues from activities permitted under its free zone license (e.g., the time charter hire paid by EgyptCo), but is exempt from CIT on profits from the same activities.

 

WHT

 

Profit repatriation from the Egypt Branch is exempt from WHT.

 

The Egypt Branch has not drawn down debt with maturity less than three years and, as such, interest payments are not subject to WHT.

 

Payments for services made to recipients that are not tax resident in Egypt are subject to 20% WHT, subject to reduction or elimination under applicable tax treaties.

 

VAT

 

As a free zone entity, the Egypt Branch is not subject to VAT on the activities permitted under its free zone license and within the permitted location to operate (e.g., the time charter hire paid by EgyptCo and related acquired goods and services).

 

Exit taxation

 

The exit of the FSRU from Egypt after the end of the time charter may be considered a deemed sale of the FSRU for Egyptian tax purposes. The gains from the deemed sale would be subject to CIT (currently at 22.5%). The gain is calculated as the fair market value of the FSRU on the exit less the tax base value after deemed depreciation based on the assumption that it is considered as an asset of the branch.

 

89

 

 

Colombian Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Colombian tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current practice as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Colombian tax considerations applicable to us.

 

Taxation of profits of Höegh FSRU IV

 

Höegh FSRU IV leases an FSRU to a charterer in Colombia. The lease agreement is regarded as a financial lease for Colombian tax purposes. Höegh FSRU IV would not have a permanent establishment in Colombia and therefore would not be subject to Colombian corporate income tax (“CIT”), VAT or Industry and Trade Tax (“ITT”). The financial component of the financial lease paid to Höegh FSRU IV would be subject to 1% withholding tax in lieu of corporate income tax in Colombia.

 

Taxation of profits of Höegh Colombia

 

Höegh Colombia provides services to the charterer in Colombia. Höegh Colombia is subject to CIT levied on its worldwide income at a rate of 33% for fiscal year 2019, 32% for fiscal year 2020, 31% for fiscal year 2021 and 30% for fiscal year 2022 and onwards. The taxable basis will be the net taxable income (gross revenues less allocable cost and expenses).

 

In addition, to the ordinary taxation system, a presumptive tax system applies. Under the presumptive tax system, Colombian rules provide that net taxable income cannot be less than a cap calculated as 0.5% of the company’s net equity as of December 31 of the previous year. Accordingly, if net taxable income is lower than the cap, the ordinary taxation will be disregarded and the presumptive tax system considerations will apply. However, such system will not apply from fiscal year 2021 and onwards, since the percentage to determine the presumptive income will be set to 0%.

 

WHT

 

Dividends paid out of profits that are subject to tax at the Colombian corporate level (CIT) have a 10.0% WHT rate (dividend tax), when distributed to foreign non-resident shareholders. Otherwise, a 38.8%, 37.9% and 37.0% WHT rate applies for the dividends on profits not subject to CIT for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022 onwards, respectively. Höegh Colombia expects to pay dividends from retained profits that were subject to Colombian CIT.

 

VAT

 

The services rendered by Höegh Colombia are subject to 19% VAT.

 

Financial Transaction Tax

 

Financial Transaction Tax is levied on the transfers from Colombian bank accounts at a rate of 0.4% of the amount transferred. A 50% share of the Financial Transaction Tax is deductible for CIT purposes.

 

ITT

 

ITT will be applicable in Cartagena for the services provided through the Cartagena office and services provided on-shore or within the boundaries of the Cartagena District. Up to 50% of the ITT paid by the Company will be a tax credit for CIT purposes, or alternatively, 100% of the ITT paid can be treated as a deduction for CIT purposes. In 2022, the tax credit will increase to 100% for CIT purposes.

 

Capital gains taxation

 

Starting in 2019, the sale of Colombian assets (i.e. shares) by a foreign non-resident is subject to a 10% capital gains tax provided the seller possessed the assets for two years or longer. If the assets are held for less than two years, the gain is subject to the ordinary corporate income tax rate at a rate of 32% for taxable year 2020 (31% on 2021 and 30% from 2022 onwards).

 

Indian Taxation

 

The following is a discussion of the material Indian tax consequences applicable to us. This discussion is based upon existing legislation and current practice adopted by the Indian revenue authorities as of the date of this Annual Report. Changes in the existing legislation and current practice may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the Indian tax considerations applicable to us.

 

90

 

 

Taxation of the Partnership and non-Indian Incorporated Subsidiaries

 

As we are a limited partnership and do not expect to be managed and controlled or domiciled within Indian or conduct business or carry out activities through a permanent establishment in India, we do not expect to be subject to taxation in India.

 

We do not currently anticipate that any of our other non-Indian incorporated subsidiaries will be controlled, managed or domiciled in India or conduct business or carry out activities through a permanent establishment in India, except as described below. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that any of our non-Indian incorporated subsidiaries will be subject to Indian corporate income tax, except as described below.

 

Taxation of profits and deduction for losses

 

Starting in 2020, SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd.’s main business activity in India will be to provide a time charter of the Cape Ann to Total Gas & Power. Total Gas & Power has sub-contracted the Cape Ann to an Indian concern. All the activities of the business (i.e., leasing, etc.) are being carried outside of India. Accordingly, SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. is not expected to be a permanent establishment in India but will be subject to certain Indian taxes, as revenue from the operating lease will be subject to royalty taxation. Royalty revenue is subject to withholding tax computed on a gross basis. Taxes are withheld from royalty invoices at a rate of 10%, plus a 2% or 5% surcharge, as applicable, and a 4% health and education tax levy (“health and education cess”). The applicable surcharge depends on the amount of revenues.

 

Höegh LNG Management will provide ship management services to the Cape Ann through a project office in India ("Indian Office"). All of the Indian Office expenses, including Indian taxes, will be invoiced to SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. as vessel operating expenses. As the Indian Office will be established in India, it is expected to be a permanent establishment and be subject to Indian taxes on a net income basis (after deduction of business expenses, subject to compliance under the applicable Indian withholding tax (“WHT”) provisions), as further described below.

 

Indian domestic tax law

 

Under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (“Indian tax laws” or “ITL”), a foreign company, that has a permanent establishment in India, is generally taxed at 40% plus a 2% or 5% surcharge, as applicable, and 4% health and education cess on net income basis. Taxable income is calculated based on accounting profits as modified by certain tax adjustments.

 

A foreign company with a permanent establishment in India is liable to pay Minimum Alternate Tax (‘MAT’) on their adjusted book profits where the tax liability under the normal provisions of the ITL is not more than 15% of such book profits. MAT credit is the amount paid over and above the normal tax liability, which can be carried forward and can be utilized for 15 years.

 

Tax depreciation

 

Depreciable assets are grouped in blocks, and each block is eligible for depreciation for taxes computed on a net income basis at a prescribed rate which ranges from 0-45%:

 

10% for furniture and fittings
15 to 45% for plant and machinery
40% for computers
25% for intangible assets

 

Where the asset is used for less than 180 days in a tax year, the depreciation is restricted to 50% of the prescribed rate in such year.

 

Withholding Taxes (“WHT”)

 

The Indian Office is required to withhold:

 

·WHT at the following rates:
o10% on payments for royalty and technical fees;
o40% on payments of other income; and
o5% on payments of interest on foreign currency loans (subject to certain conditions)

 

91

 

 

The WHT rate rates are adjusted for applicable surcharge and health and education cess. The amount of WHT paid during the year represents a prepayment of ITL for the recipient of income that is a permanent establishment in India.

 

Carry forward of losses

 

Any tax loss can be carried forward for a maximum period of 8 years. Loss carry back is not permitted in India.

 

Crew payroll taxes

 

The salary of the crew will be taxable in India under the ITL if the services are performed in India (irrespective of the residential status of the crew). Salaries and wages paid to employees (including non-resident employees) are subject to tax at rates ranging from 10% to 30% (plus applicable surcharge and health and education cess). The Indian Office will pay the payroll taxes on behalf of the crew.

 

Goods and services tax (“GST”)

 

With respect to the provision of ship management services through the Indian Office, services provided will be subject to Indian GST. The ship management income invoiced by the Indian Office will include GST at a rate of 18%. The GST charged on the invoice from the Indian Office to SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. will not be creditable and, therefore, will be a cost for the FSRU’s ship management services.

 

92

 

 

  C.  Organizational Structure

 

We are a publicly traded limited partnership formed on April 28, 2014. The diagram below depicts our simplified organizational structure as of March 31, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, we have issued and outstanding 33,286,284 common units, 6,707,999 Series A preferred units and incentive distribution rights, and as of March 31, 2020 Höegh LNG owns 15,257,498 of our common units and incentive distribution rights issued and outstanding.

 

 

(1)On February 4, 2020, the Certificate of Dissolution was received from Cayman Islands, certifying that Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. will be dissolved on May 4, 2020.

 

We listed our common units on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) in August 2014 under the ticker symbol “HMLP.” Our preferred units are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “HMLP-A.”

 

We were formed under the law of the Marshall Islands and maintain our principal executive headquarters at Wessex House, 5th Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton HM12, Bermuda.

 

A full list of our significant operating and vessel-owning subsidiaries is included in Exhibit 8.1.

 

  D.  Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Other than the vessels in our fleet, we do not have any material property.

 

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comment

 

Not applicable.

 

93

 

 

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

 

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with “Item 3.A. Selected Financial Data” and “Item 4. Information on the Partnership” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes of Höegh LNG Partners LP, included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Such financial statements, including related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and are presented in U.S. Dollars.

 

Prior to the closing of the IPO on August 12, 2014, Höegh LNG contributed to us all of its equity interests in and promissory notes due to it from Höegh Lampung, PT Höegh (the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung) and our joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (the owner of the Neptune) and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (the owner the Cape Ann) (the “initial fleet”). The transfer was recorded at Höegh LNG’s consolidated book values, as converted to US GAAP. 

 

Overview

 

We were formed on April 28, 2014 as a growth-oriented limited partnership by Höegh LNG, to own, operate and acquire FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets under long-term charters, which we define as charters of five or more years.

 

On August 12, 2014, we completed our IPO. At the closing of the IPO, we sold 11,040,000 common units to the public for net proceeds, after deduction of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses, of $203.5 million. We also issued 2,116,060 common units and 13,156,060 subordinated units, representing approximately 58.0% of the limited partner interest in the Partnership, and 100% of the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) to Höegh LNG. A wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG owns a non-economic general partner interest in us.

 

On October 1, 2015, we purchased 100% of the shares of Höegh FSRU III, the entity that indirectly owned the FSRU Höegh Gallant, which we accounted for as the acquisition of a business. Accordingly, the results of this acquisition are included in our earnings from October 1, 2015.

 

In December 2016, we completed a 6,588,389 common unit offering raising approximately $111.5 million in net proceeds, after deduction of underwriters’ discount and offering expenses to be used primarily to fund the purchase price of the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding, the owner of Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia, the entities that own and operate the Höegh Grace (the "Höegh Grace entities").

 

On January 3, 2017, we closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities for cash consideration of $91.8 million, excluding the working capital adjustment. On January 1, 2017, we entered into an agreement with Höegh LNG, under which Höegh LNG granted us the authority to make decisions about operations of Höegh Colombia Holding from January 1, 2017 to the closing date of the acquisition. Accordingly, the results of the Höegh Grace are included in our earnings from January 1, 2017.

 

On October 5, 2017, we issued to the public 4,600,000 8.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units (the “Series A preferred units”) for proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and expenses, of $110.9 million. A portion of the net proceeds was used to repay outstanding debt under the seller's credit note related to the Höegh Gallant acquisition and outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility and the remainder of the net proceeds were used to fund the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

On December 1, 2017, we closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities. From January 1, 2017 until November 30, 2017, the results of the Höegh Grace entities were reduced by non-controlling interest and until December 1, 2017 total equity was split between partners' capital and the non-controlling interest.

 

On January 26, 2018, the Partnership entered into sales agreement with B. Riley FBR Inc. (the “Agent”). Under the terms of the sales agreement, the Partnership could offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and 8.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units (“Series A preferred units”) through the Agent, acting as agent for the Partnership (the “Prior ATM Program”).

 

On October 18, 2019, the Partnership entered into a sales agreement with the Agent for a new ATM program and terminated the Prior ATM Program. Under the terms of the new sales agreement, the Partnership may offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and Series A preferred units, from time to time, through the Agent, acting as an agent for the Partnership. Sales of such units may be made in negotiated transactions that are deemed to be "at the market" offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or through a market maker other than on an exchange.

 

On January 31, 2019, Höegh FSRU III transferred its ownership in Höegh Cyprus to our operating company.

 

94

 

 

Our Fleet

 

Our fleet consisted of interests in the following vessels as of December 31, 2019:

 

·a 50% interest in the Neptune, an FSRU built in 2009 that is currently operating under a time charter with Global LNG Supply, a subsidiary of Total, that expires in 2029, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 50% interest in the Cape Ann, an FSRU built in 2010 that is currently operating under a time charter with Global LNG Supply that expires in 2030, with an option to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each;

 

  · a 100% economic interest in the PGN FSRU Lampung, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with PGN LNG, a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, a government controlled Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company, that expires in 2034, with options to extend either for an additional 10 years or for up to two additional periods of five years each;

  

  · a 100% interest in the Höegh Gallant, an FSRU built in 2014 that is currently operating under a time charter with EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, that expires in April 2020. EgyptCo had a time charter agreement with EGAS until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. In addition, we have an option agreement pursuant to which we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. On February 27, 2020, we exercised the option and intend to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant (the “Subsequent Charter”); and

 

  · a 100% interest in the Höegh Grace, an FSRU built in 2016 that is currently operating under a time charter with SPEC. SPEC is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. The non-cancellable charter period of 10 years ends in December 2026. The initial term of the charter is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if SPEC waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, we will not be able to exercise our right to terminate in year 10.

 

For a description of our joint ventures and our shareholder agreements, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements.”

  

Pursuant to the omnibus agreement we entered into with Höegh LNG at the time of the IPO, Höegh LNG is obligated to offer to us any FSRU or LNG carrier operating under a charter of five or more years. Accordingly, the Partnership may have in the future the opportunity to acquire certain FSRUs from Höegh LNG as described under “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Our Fleet—Additional FSRUs.”

 

There can be no assurance that we will acquire any vessels from Höegh LNG or of the terms upon which any such acquisition may be made.   

 

Our Charters

 

We and our joint ventures generate revenues by chartering our vessels under long-term time charters. As of March 31, 2020, the average remaining term of the time charters for the vessels in our fleet was approximately 9.2 years, excluding the exercise of any customer options, and 16.2 years, assuming the exercise of all customer options.

 

Under our time charters for the Neptune and the Cape Ann, the rate charged for the services of each vessel, which we call the “hire rate,” is paid monthly in advance. Under our time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, the hire rate is paid monthly in arrears. Under certain time charters, hire payments may be reduced and /or liquidated damages may be incurred if the vessel does not perform to certain of her specifications.

 

Moreover, when a vessel is “off-hire”—or not available for service—the customer generally is not required to pay any hire rate, and the vessel owner is responsible for all costs. Prolonged off-hire may lead to termination of the time charter.

  

Under the time charters for the Neptune and the Cape Ann, the hire rate includes the following three cost components:

 

  · Fixed Element. The fixed element is a fixed per day fee providing for ownership costs and all remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

 

95

 

 

  · Variable (Operating Cost) Element. The variable (operating cost) element is a fixed per day fee providing for the operating costs of the vessel, which consists of (i) a cost pass-through sub-element, which covers the crew, insurance, consumables, miscellaneous services, spares and damage deductible costs and is subject to annual adjustment and (ii) an indexed sub-element, which covers management and is subject to annual adjustment for changes in labor costs and the size of the fleet under management.

 

  · Optional (Capitalized Equipment Cost) Element. The optional (capitalized equipment cost) element is a revenue for the reimbursement of costs incurred that consists of (i) costs associated with modifications to, changes in specifications of, structural changes in or new equipment for the vessel that become compulsory for the continued operation of the vessel by reason of new class requirements or national or international regulations coming into effect after the date of the time charter, subject to specified caps and (ii) costs associated with any new equipment or machinery that the owner and charterer have agreed should be capitalized. Such revenues for these reimbursements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the capital improvement or the remaining term of the time charter.

 

Under the Neptune and Cape Ann time charters, a vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use for a specific amount of time due to, among other things:

 

  · failure of an inspection that prevents the vessel from performing normal commercial operations;

 

  · scheduled drydocking that exceeds allowances;

 

· the vessel’s inability to discharge regasified LNG at normal performance;

 

  · requisition of the vessel; or

 

  · the vessel owner’s failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with her specifications and contractual standards or to provide the required crew.

 

The hire rate under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter consists of the following three cost components:

 

  · Fixed Element. The fixed element is a fixed per day fee, which is intended to cover remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

 

  · Operating and Maintenance Element. The operating and maintenance element is a fixed per day fee, subject to annual adjustment, which is intended to cover the operating costs of the vessel, including manning costs, maintenance and repair costs, consumables and stores costs, insurance costs, management and operational costs, miscellaneous costs and alterations not required by Det Norske Veritas GL to maintain class or the IMO.

 

  · Tax Element. The tax element is a fixed per day fee, equal to the vessel owner’s reasonable estimate of the tax liability for that charter year divided by the number of days in such charter year. If the vessel owner receives a tax refund or credit, the vessel owner will pay such amount to the charterer. The tax liability includes Indonesian corporate income taxes, defined withholding taxes and all Indonesian taxes associated with the Mooring. The time charter requires an annual audit to determine the difference between the invoiced estimate of the tax liability and the actual tax liability. If the vessel owner’s reasonable estimate of the tax liability varied from the actual tax liability, the vessel owner or the charterer, as applicable, will pay to the other party the difference in such amount.

 

Under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use for a specified amount of time due to, among other things:

 

  · drydocking that exceeds allowances;

 

  · the vessel failing to satisfy specified operational minimum requirements, except as a result of a Lampung Charterer Risk Event (as defined under “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter—Performance Standards”) or an event of force majeure; or

 

  · the vessel owner’s failure to satisfy the management warranties described under “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter—Performance Standards.”

 

96

 

 

The hire rate under the Höegh Gallant time charter is a fixed per day fee which is intended to cover remuneration due to the vessel owner for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services as well as the operating and maintenance costs of the vessel, including manning costs, the cost of spare parts, bunker fuel and any tax incurred.

 

Under the Höegh Gallant time charter, the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use for a specified amount of time due to, among other things: 

 

  · drydocking or other repairs and maintenance;

 

  · any force majeure event acting on the vessel; and

 

  · every other occasion the vessel ceases to be at the disposal of the charterer, including due to damage, defect, deficiency of crew or spare parts, labor disputes, time in and waiting to enter dry dock for repairs or because of a failure to comply with laws, regulations, physical requirements or operational practices at the site of vessel operations.

 

Additionally, we have agreed to indemnify EgyptCo for any loss (up to a specified cap), including loss of earnings and certain liquidated damages or performance warranties payable under EgyptCo’s charter, caused by an operational failure of the vessel.

  

Under the Höegh Grace charter, hire is payable monthly, in arrears, in U.S. Dollars. The charterer pays a fixed daily rate of hire for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services and operating fees, as set forth in the Höegh Grace charter. The operating fees are escalated yearly by a fixed percentage, and the charter provides for a review and reasonable adjustment by the parties if the actual operating costs increase by more than such percentage over a period of three consecutive years.

 

Except for force majeure events and a specified maintenance allowance period, under the Höegh Grace charter the vessel generally will be deemed off-hire:

 

  · if the vessel is not able to discharge regasified LNG at a specified rate;

 

  · if the vessel owner breaches its warranties related to international sanctions; or

 

  · if the vessel is not available for the charterer’s use due to, among other things:

 

oany damage, defect, breakdown or deficiency to the vessel;

 

oany deficiency of crew, stores, repairs, surveys, or similar cause preventing the working of the vessel;

 

oany labor dispute, failure or inability of the officers or crew to perform the required services; or

 

oany failure to comply with laws, regulations or operational practices at the site of the vessel operations.

 

In the event of off-hire, all hire will cease to be due or payable for the duration of off-hire.

 

Additionally, we have agreed to pay liquidated damages in the event that the Höegh Grace is unable to meet specified performance standards, which are subject to various caps per cargo, per year and in the aggregate for the term of the Höegh Grace charter.

 

As further discussed in note 2 of our consolidated financial statements; Significant accounting policies—Time charter revenue, related contract balances and related expenses;—Performance obligations; and Contract terms, determination of transaction price and allocation to performance obligations, the performance warranties included in all of our time charters is an important element in determining variable consideration for time charter services for revenue recognition purposes.

 

We have obtained loss of hire insurance to protect us against loss of income in the event one of our vessels cannot be employed due to damage that is covered under the terms of our hull and machinery insurance. Please read “—Insurance and Indemnifications.”

 

For more information on our time charters, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters.”

 

97

 

 

Impact of Our Interests in Joint Ventures on Our Financial Information

 

Two of the five vessels in our fleet as of December 31, 2019 are owned by our joint ventures, each of which is owned 50% by us. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements.” Under applicable accounting guidance, we do not consolidate the financial results of our joint ventures into our financial results, but we record our joint venture results using the equity method of accounting. The following provides a description of the impact of our interests in our joint ventures on selected components of our statements of income in our consolidated financial statements.

 

  · Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Joint Ventures. Consists of our 50% share of the combined net income of our joint ventures. The net income of our joint ventures gives effect to interest expense associated with payments on the shareholder loans to the owners of our joint ventures as described below. Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures also includes the unrealized gains or losses on adjusting the interest rate swap contracts to fair value in each period, which can result in significant volatility between years. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 there was no income tax expense for our joint ventures. The equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures is a “one line” consolidation of the results of our joint ventures. Therefore, our joint venture’s revenues and expenses are not included in other lines of the consolidated income statement.

 

  · Interest Income. Interest income represents our share of interest income accrued on the advances to our joint ventures (shareholder loans). The shareholder loans were originally issued by Höegh LNG to our joint ventures and were transferred to our operating company in connection with the IPO. For a description of the shareholder loans, please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Joint Ventures Debt—Loans Due to Owners (Shareholder Loans).”

 

The following provides a description of the impact of our interests in our joint ventures on selected components of our balance sheets in the consolidated financial statements.

 

  · Advances to Joint Ventures. Represents our share of the advances to our joint ventures (shareholder loans). Please read note 10 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

  · Accumulated Earnings (Losses) of Joint Ventures. Accumulated earnings of joint ventures represents our share of the net assets of our joint ventures. Accumulated losses of joint ventures represents our share of the net liabilities of our joint ventures. Our joint ventures entered into interest rate swap contracts, which historically have had unrealized mark-to-market losses on the interest rate swap contracts recorded as derivative instrument liabilities on the combined balance sheets. As a result, for the periods up to and including December 31, 2018, the liabilities exceeded the assets for our joint ventures’ combined balance sheets and result in us having a net liability balance for our investment in our joint ventures. Please read note 9 of our consolidated financial statements. The investment in accumulated earnings or (accumulated losses) of our joint ventures is a “one line” consolidation of the balance sheet of our joint ventures. Therefore, our joint ventures’ assets and liabilities are not included in other lines of the consolidated balance sheet.

 

We derive cash flows from the operations of our joint ventures from interest payments related to accrued interest on our share of the shareholder loans issued to such joint ventures. Under the terms of the shareholders’ agreement, the payments are prioritized over any dividend payment to the owners. Our joint ventures have not paid any dividends to date. The payments of interest are made based upon available cash after servicing our joint ventures’ long-term bank debt. Therefore, the payments of interest have historically been less than interest income accrued for the period. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016 and all of the payments for the year ended December 31, 2017 represented payments of interest, including accrued interest to be repaid at the end of the loans. The shareholder loans are subordinated to long-term bank debt and the repayment plan is subject to quarterly discretionary revisions based on available cash after servicing of the long-term bank debt and meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio. As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Accordingly, the outstanding balance on the shareholder loans was classified as long-term as of December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 18 of our consolidated financial statements under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.” The settlement is expected to be paid in instalments during 2020. No repayments of shareholder loans are expected until the boil-off claim is settled. The Partnership will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for its share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement. As of December 31, 2019, the prospective debt service ratio had not been met for the joint venture owning the Cape Ann. As a result, no payments on the shareholder loans related to the Cape Ann can be made until the debt service coverage ratio is met in future periods. Refer to note 10 of our consolidated financial statements.  

 

98

 

 

The following provides a description of the impacts of our interests in our joint ventures on our statement of cash flows in our consolidated financial statements:

 

·Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities. Receipt of cash payments for interest income on the shareholder loans, including accrued interest repaid from prior periods, is reflected in cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities. Such payments amounted to zero, for both the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and $4.3 million, for the year ended December 31, 2017. All other cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities relate to our other activities.

 

Please read our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for more detailed information.

 

Historical Employment of Our Fleet

 

The following table describes the operations of the vessels in our fleet as of December 31, 2019. 

 

Vessel   Description of Historical Operations
Neptune   Delivered in November 2009. Has operated under a long-term time charter with Global LNG Supply, as novated to Total Gas & Power in February 2020, which commenced on delivery.
Cape Ann   Delivered in June 2010. Has operated under a long-term time charter with Global LNG Supply, as novated to Total Gas & Power in February 2020, which commenced on delivery.
PGN FSRU Lampung   Delivered in April 2014. Has operated under a long-term time charter with PGN LNG, which commenced on July 21, 2014.
Höegh Gallant   Delivered in November 2014. Acquired on October 1, 2015. Has operated under a time charter with EgyptCo since the acquisition date.  
Höegh Grace   Delivered in March 2016. Acquired 51% ownership interest on January 3, 2017 and acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest on December 1, 2017. Has operated under a long-term time charter with SPEC since acquisition date.

 

Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Historical Financial Performance and Assessing Our Future Prospects

 

You should consider the following facts when evaluating our historical results of operations and assessing our future prospects:

 

  · The size of our fleet continues to change. Our historical results of operations reflect changes in the size and composition of our fleet due to certain vessel deliveries. The PGN FSRU Lampung was delivered from the shipyard in April 2014 and commenced operations in July 2014 and, as such, has had historical operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2019. As of October 1, 2015, we increased our fleet with the acquisition of the Höegh Gallant which contributed to our results of operations starting in the fourth quarter of 2015. Commencing on January 1, 2017, the Höegh Grace has contributed to our earnings due to our acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities. On December 1, 2017, we acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities. From January 1, 2017 until November 30, 2017, our net income was reduced with a non-controlling interest to arrive at the limited partners' interest in net income. As of December 1, 2017, the Höegh Grace has contributed 100% to our earnings without a reduction of non-controlling interest as such, the operations of the Höegh Grace have contributed 100% to our earnings during both 2019 and 2018. Furthermore, we may grow through the acquisition in the future of additional vessels as part of our growth strategy.

 

  · Upon completion of the Series A preferred unit offering on October 5, 2017, preferred unitholders have an interest in net income. The Series A preferred units represent perpetual equity interests in us. The Series A preferred units rank senior to our common units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The distribution rate on the Series A preferred units is 8.75% per annum. The distributions accrue and are cumulative. Distributions are payable quarterly, when, and if declared by the Partnership's board of directors out of legally available funds for such purpose. The preferred unitholders' interest in net income is equivalent to the amount of preferred unitholders' distribution for the given quarter or annual period and reduces the net income attributable to the limited partners' interest in net income.

 

99

 

 

  ·

Our historical results of operations are affected by significant gains and losses relating to derivative transactions. Our historical results of operations reflect significant gains and losses relating to the joint ventures’ interest rate swap contracts that impact our equity in earnings (losses) for our joint ventures. The joint ventures’ interest rate swap contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As a result, there is volatility in earnings for the unrealized exchange gains and losses on the interest rate swap contracts. On March 17, 2014, we entered into interest rate swap contracts related to the Lampung facility (as defined below). On October 1, 2015, we assumed the interest rate swap contracts related to the Gallant facility (as defined below) as part of the acquisition of the Höegh Gallant. On January 1, 2017, we assumed the interest rate swap contracts related to the Grace facility (as defined below) as part of the acquisition of 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities. The interest rate swaps related to the Lampung facility, the Gallant facility and the Grace facility were designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, however, certain amortization and the ineffective portion of the hedge for the years up to and including December 31, 2018, impacts the results of operations. Starting January 1, 2019, under the revised accounting guidance for hedge accounting, the impact of the ineffective portion of the hedge is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and does not impact the results of operations. Hedge accounting was discontinued for interest rate swaps related to the Gallant and Grace facilities in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the facilities which occurred on January 29, 2019. On January 31, 2019, the interest rate swaps related to the Gallant and Grace facilities were settled. In December 2018 and February 2019, the Partnership entered into interest rate swaps for the commercial tranches of a new $385 million facility to refinance the debt facility for the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, which were designed as cash flow hedges. Refer to note 17 of our consolidated financial statements. We may enter into (i) additional interest rate swap contracts to economically hedge all or a portion of our exposure to floating interest rates and (ii) foreign currency swap contracts to economically hedge risk from foreign currency fluctuations.

 

  · Our historical results of operations are impacted by management and service fees for vessel operating and administrative expenses provided by Höegh LNG's affiliates. Our operating entities entered into a variety of management, technical service and consulting agreements with affiliates of Höegh LNG related to the operations of the vessels. In addition, we and our operating company entered into administrative services agreements with affiliates of Höegh LNG. Refer to "Item 7. B. Related Party Transactions" for information on the management and service fees for these agreements.

 

  · Our results of operations are affected by accounting for the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter as a financing lease. When the PGN FSRU Lampung began operating under her charter, we recorded a receivable (net investment in financing lease) and removed the PGN FSRU Lampung from our balance sheet. The lease element of time charter payments under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter is split between revenues and the repayment of part of the receivable. The revenues are recorded using the effective interest method, which provides for a constant rate of return on the net investment. As a result, the revenues will decline over time as more of the time charter payments are treated as a repayment of the receivable. However, the cash flows from the PGN FSRU Lampung are not impacted by the accounting treatment. In addition, since there is no vessel  on the balance sheet, there is no charge for depreciation expense. In our consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019, the time charter payments reflected as revenues and for repayment of the receivable are included under net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. In our consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the time charter payments reflected as revenues are included under net cash provided by (used in) operating activities while the repayment of the receivable are included under net cash provided by (used in) investing activities. The change in classification in cash flows for 2019 related to the cash flows from the repayment of the lease receivable is a result of adopting the revised guidance for leases on January 1, 2019.

 

·Outbreaks of epidemic and pandemic diseases and governmental responses thereto could adversely affect our business. Our operations are subject to risks related to outbreaks of infectious diseases. For example, the recent Coronavirus outbreak has negatively affected economic conditions and may otherwise impact our operations, including availability of crew, and the operations of our customers and suppliers. Although our operations have not been affected by the Coronavirus outbreak to date, the ultimate length and severity of the Coronavirus outbreak is uncertain at this time.

 

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

 

We believe the principal factors that will affect our future results of operations include:

 

  · the number of vessels in our fleet;

 

  · our ability to successfully employ our vessels at economically attractive hire rates as long-term charters expire or are otherwise terminated;

  

  · our ability to maintain strong relationships with our existing customers and to increase the number of customer relationships;

 

  · the operating performance of our vessels and any related performance warranty claims by Total or other customers;

 

  · our ability to acquire additional vessels, including Höegh LNG’s other newbuildings;

 

  · our ability to raise capital to fund acquisitions;

 

100

 

 

  · the levels of demand for FSRU and LNG carrier services and other LNG infrastructure;  
     
  · the supply and capacities of FSRUs;

 

  · the hire rate earned by our vessels, unscheduled off-hire days and the level of our vessel operating expenses;

 

  · the effective and efficient technical and maritime management and crewing of our vessels;

 

  · economic, regulatory, political and governmental conditions that affect the floating LNG industry;

 

  · interest rate changes;

 

  · mark-to-market changes in interest rate swap contracts;

 

  · foreign currency exchange gains and losses;

 

  · our access to capital required to acquire additional vessels and/or to implement our business strategy;

 

  · variations in crewing and insurance costs;

 

  · the level of our debt and the related interest expense; and
     
  · the amount of distributions on our common and preferred units.

 

Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors” for a discussion of certain risks inherent in our business.

 

Customers

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, time charter revenues in the consolidated statement of income are from PGN LNG, a subsidiary of a subsidiary of PGN; a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, a government controlled Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company, EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, and SPEC, which is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. Revenues included as a component of equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures are from Global LNG Supply and accounted for 100% of our joint ventures’ time charter revenues for all periods presented. Global LNG Supply is a subsidiary of Total, a French publicly listed company.

 

Inflation and Cost Increases

 

Inflation has not had a significant impact on operating expenses, including crewing costs, for the Neptune and the Cape Ann. FSRUs are specialized vessels, and there has been demand for experienced crew, which has led to higher crew costs. The Neptune and the Cape Ann time charters provide for operating cost pass-through, which means that we will be able to pass on the cost increases to the charterer.

 

A portion of the operating cost for the PGN FSRU Lampung will increase for inflation in Indonesia, including part of the crew cost and certain supplies. Indonesian inflation has ranged from approximately 3.0% to approximately 6.5% in recent years. The PGN FSRU Lampung time charter provides that the operating cost component of the hire rate, established at the beginning of the time charter, will increase by a fixed percentage per year for the first five years and be reset each fifth year based on the average increase over the previous five years, which is expected to somewhat mitigate cost increases.

 

The Höegh Gallant has operated as an LNG carrier during 2019. Inflation has not had a significant impact on operating expenses during 2019.

 

The Höegh Grace operates in Colombia and inflation in Colombia has ranged from approximately 3.0% to over 7.0% in recent years. All revenues under the Höegh Grace charter are received in U.S. dollars. A limited amount of operating expenses related to the Höegh Grace is denominated in Colombian Pesos, and as such, we bear a limited risk of cost increase due to inflation or exchange rates.  

 

Insurance and indemnifications

 

Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management” for information on the insurance coverage of certain risks inherent in our business.  

 

Environmental indemnifications. Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agreed to indemnify the Partnership until August 12, 2019 against certain environmental and toxic tort liabilities with respect to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership to the extent arising prior to the time they were contributed or sold to the Partnership. No indemnification claims were filed for environmental liabilities under the agreement prior to its expiration.

 

101

 

 

Other indemnifications. Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG also agreed to indemnify the Partnership for losses:

 

  · related to certain defects in title to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership and any failure to obtain, prior to the time they were contributed to the Partnership, certain consents and permits necessary to conduct the business, which liabilities arose within three years after the closing of the IPO;
     
    · related to certain tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership prior to the time they were contributed or sold;

  

  · in the event that the Partnership does not receive hire rate payments under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on August 12, 2014 through the earlier of (i) the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung or (ii) the termination of such time charter. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the September 2014 and October 2014 invoices not paid by PGN LNG (refer to notes 15 and 18 of our consolidated financial statements);

 

  · with respect to any obligation to pay liquidated damages to PGN LNG under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for failure to deliver the PGN FSRU Lampung by the scheduled delivery date set forth in the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter;

 

  · with respect to any non-budgeted expenses (including repair costs) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project (including the construction of the Mooring) occurring prior to the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung pursuant to the time charter; and

 

  · pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 12, 2015, Höegh LNG confirmed that the indemnification provisions of the omnibus agreement include indemnification for all non-budgeted, non-creditable Indonesian value added taxes and non-budgeted Indonesian withholding taxes, including any related impact on cash flow from PT Höegh and interest and penalties associated with any non-timely Indonesian tax filings related to the ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring whether incurred (i) prior to the closing date of the IPO, (ii) after the closing date of the IPO to the extent such taxes, interest, penalties or related impact on cash flows relate to periods of ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring and are not subject to prior indemnification payments or deemed reimbursable by the charterer under its audit of the taxes related to the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for periods up to and including June 30, 2015, or (iii) after June 30, 2015 to the extent withholding taxes exceed the minimum amount of withholding tax due under Indonesian tax regulations due to lack of documentation or untimely withholding tax filings.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for non-budgeted expenses (including warranty provisions, other non-budgeted expenses and replacement capital expenditure) of $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which were recorded as a contribution to equity. Indemnification payments received from Höegh LNG are subject to repayment to the extent the amounts are subsequently recovered from insurance or deemed reimbursable by the charterer.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to insurance proceeds received related to the warranty provision and costs for previous years determined to be reimbursable by the charterer. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $2.5 million related to previously recognized revenue from 2014 that was deemed reimbursable in 2017 and an additional cost recovery of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a cash distribution from equity. Refer to notes 15 and 18 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

102

 

 

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreement entered into with respect to the purchase of the entity that indirectly owns the Höegh Gallant, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

 

  · losses from breach of warranty;
  · losses related to certain environmental and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Gallant prior to the closing date;
  · all capital gains tax or other export duty incurred in connection with the transfer of the Höegh Gallant outside of Höegh Cyprus’s permanent establishment in a Public Free Zone in Egypt;
  · any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to Höegh LNG Management with respect to payroll taxes;
  · any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the time charter with EgyptCo or EgyptCo’s time charter with EGAS; and
  · liabilities under the Gallant/Grace facility not attributable to the Höegh Gallant.

 

Additionally, Höegh LNG has guaranteed the payment of hire by EgyptCo pursuant to the time charter for the Höegh Gallant under certain circumstances.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the time charter with EgyptCo of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to notes 15 and 18 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreement entered into with respect to the acquisition of the 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

 

  · losses from breach of warranty;
  · losses related to certain environmental liabilities, damages or repair costs and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Grace prior to the closing date;
  · any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to tax authorities with respect to payroll taxes, taxes related to social security payments, corporate income taxes (including income tax for equality and surcharge on income tax for equality), withholding tax, port associations, local Cartagena tax, and financial transaction tax, including any penalties associated with taxes to the extent not reimbursed by the charterer;
  · any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the Höegh Grace charter with SPEC; and
  · any losses suffered or incurred in relation to the performance guarantee we have provided with respect to the Höegh Grace charter, up to Höegh LNG’s pro rata share of such losses, based on its remaining ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding. This provision is not applicable after December 1, 2017, when the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

On September 27, 2017, the Partnership entered into an indemnification agreement with Höegh LNG with respect to the boil-off claims under the Neptune and the Cape Ann time charters, pursuant to which Höegh LNG will, among other things, indemnify the Partnership for its share of any losses and expenses related to or arising from the failure of either Neptune or Cape Ann to meet the performance standards related to the daily boil-off of LNG under their respective time charters (including any cash impact that may result from any settlement with respect to such claims, including any reduction in the hire rate under either time charter.) For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Partnership received indemnification payments of $0.3 million from Höegh LNG. Indemnification payments were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to notes 15 and 18 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

103

 

 

  A. Operating Results

 

The following table summarizes our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Statement of Income Data:            
Time charter revenues  $145,321   $144,952   $143,531 
Other revenue   115    1,609     
Total revenues   145,436    146,561    143,531 
Vessel operating expenses   (30,870)   (24,195)   (23,791)
Construction contract expenses           (151)
Administrative expenses   (9,861)   (8,916)   (9,910)
Depreciation and amortization   (21,477)   (21,146)   (21,054)
Total operating expenses   (62,208)   (54,257)   (54,906)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures   6,078    17,938    5,139 
Operating income (loss)   89,306    110,242    93,764 
Interest income   947    725    500 
Interest expense   (27,692)   (26,814)   (30,085)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   1,030         
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments       4,681    2,463 
Other items, net   (3,575)   (2,907)   (3,574)
Total financial income (expense), net   (29,290)   (24,315)   (30,696)
Income (loss) before tax   60,016    85,927    63,068 
Income tax expense   (7,275)   (8,305)   (3,878)
Net income (loss)  $52,741   $77,622   $59,190 
Non-controlling interest in net income           10,408 
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income   13,850    12,303    2,480 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $38,891   $65,319   $46,302 

 

104

 

 

Financial Highlights in 2019

 

The following sets forth our significant developments for the year ended December 31, 2019:

 

·Reported time charter revenues were $145.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $145.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018;

 

·Operating income was $89.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $110.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018; operating income was impacted by unrealized losses on derivative instruments for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with unrealized gains on derivative instruments for the year ended December 31, 2018 on the Partnership's share of equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures;

 

·Unrealized loss on derivative instruments was $5.2 million on the Partnership’s share of equity in earnings of joint ventures for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to unrealized gain on derivative instruments of $8.5 million on the Partnership’s share of equity in earnings of joint ventures for the year ended December 31, 2018;

 

·Excluding the impact of the unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives, the decrease in operating income was primarily due to higher maintenance expense, property tax and penalties and administrative expenses which were partially offset by an increased contribution from equity in earnings of joint ventures;

 

·Net income was $52.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2018

 

Time Charter Revenues. The following table sets forth details of our time charter revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Time charter revenues  $145,321   $144,952   $369 

 

Time charter revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $145.3 million, an increase of $0.4 million from $144.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly due to higher time charter revenue for the Höegh Grace, which was partially offset by lower revenues for the PGN FSRU Lampung. The time charter revenues were also slightly higher for the Höegh Gallant. The increase in revenues for the Höegh Grace related to higher reimbursable costs for the year ended December 31, 2019. Time charter revenues for the PGN FSRU Lampung were impacted in both the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 by the conclusion of audits by the charterer of the final amounts that would be reimbursed for prior year expenses which resulted in the recognition of revenue that was previously considered constrained variable consideration. However, the additional revenue recognized for reimbursement of prior year expenses was lower for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018. Refer to note 5 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information. Time charter revenues for the Höegh Gallant increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 as the combination of performance claims and off-hire was somewhat lower in 2019 than in 2018.

 

Time charter revenues for the PGN FSRU Lampung consisted of the lease element of the time charter, accounted for as a financing lease using the effective interest rate method, as well as fees for providing time charter services, reimbursement for vessel operating expenses and certain taxes incurred. Time charter revenues for the Höegh Gallant consisted of the fixed daily hire rate which covers the operating lease and the provision of time charter services including the costs incurred to operate the vessel. The time charter revenues for the Höegh Grace consisted of a lease element accounted for as an operating lease, as well as fees for providing time charter services, reimbursement of vessel operating expenses and certain taxes incurred.

 

The Höegh Gallant’s time charter with subsidiary of Höegh LNG expires in April 2020. Pursuant to an option agreement, we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the existing charter until July 2025, at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, we exercised the option and intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by our conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

105

 

 

Other revenue. The following table sets forth details of our vessel operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Other revenue  $115   $1,609   $(1,494)

 

Other revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.1 million, a decrease of $1.5 million from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, other revenue consists of insurance proceeds received for a claim related to the PGN FSRU Lampung's warranty work from prior periods and the probable insurance recovery for repair expenses incurred for the Höegh Gallant of approximately $1.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

 

Vessel Operating Expenses. The following table sets forth details of our vessel operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Vessel operating expenses  $(30,870)  $(24,195)  $(6,675)

 

Vessel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $30.9 million, an increase of $6.7 million from $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The higher expenses were mainly due to maintenance expenses of approximately $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, principally for the Höegh Gallant but also for the PGN FSRU Lampung. During the scheduled drydock of the Höegh Gallant and the on-water survey of the PGN FSRU Lampung, the opportunity was utilized to complete as many maintenance procedures as possible. For the year ended December 31, 2018, vessel operating expenses included repair expenses incurred for the Höegh Gallant due to technical issues in the fourth quarter of 2018. In addition, vessel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 included $3.0 million of Indonesian property tax and penalties that was assessed on the PGN FSRU Lampung for the years 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was as a result of the issuance of a new regulation in 2019 defining FSRUs as subject to the existing Indonesian property tax law.  

 

Administrative Expenses. The following table sets forth details of our administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Administrative expenses  $(9,861)  $(8,916)  $(945)

 

Administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $9.9 million, an increase of $1.0 million from $8.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was mainly due to higher administrative expenses for partnership expenses for legal and audit fees.  

 

Depreciation and Amortization. The following table sets forth details of our depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Depreciation and amortization  $(21,477)  $(21,146)  $(331)

 

Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $21.5 million, an increase of $0.4 million from $21.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

106

 

 

Total Operating Expenses. The following table sets forth details of our total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Total operating expenses  $(62,208)  $(54,257)  $(7,951)

 

Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $62.2 million, an increase of $7.9 million from $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is largely a result of the higher vessel operating expenses, due to increased maintenance expense and the retroactively assessed property tax, and higher administrative expense.

 

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of Joint Ventures. The following table sets forth details of our equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

  

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures  $6,078   $17,938   $(11,860)

 

Equity in earnings of joint ventures for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $6.1 million, a decrease of $11.8 million from equity in earnings of $17.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The main reason for the decrease related to unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments. Equity in earnings of joint ventures was impacted by unrealized losses on derivative instruments of $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with unrealized gains on derivative instruments of $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Our share of our joint ventures’ operating income was $23.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $0.9 million compared with $22.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to lower vessel operating and administrative expenses.

 

Our share of other income (expense), net, principally consisting of interest expense, was $12.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $1.0 million from $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The reduction in interest expense was principally due to the repayment of outstanding loan balances for bank financing during the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Our share of unrealized losses on derivative instruments was $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $13.7 million compared to our share of unrealized gains on derivative instruments of $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The joint ventures utilize interest rate swap contracts to exchange floating interest rate payments for fixed interest rate payments to reduce the exposure to interest rate variability on their outstanding floating-rate debt. The interest rate swap contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As a result, there is volatility in earnings for the unrealized exchange gains and losses on the interest rate swap contracts.

 

There was no accrued income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our joint ventures did not pay any dividends for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

Operating Income. The following table sets forth details of our operating income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Operating income (loss)  $89,306   $110,242   $(20,936)

 

107

 

 

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $89.3 million, a decrease of $20.9 million from $110.2 million for year ended December 31, 2018. Excluding the unrealized losses on derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the unrealized gains on derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2018 impacting the equity in earnings of joint ventures, operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019 would have been $94.5 million, a decrease of $7.2 million from $101.7 million for year ended December 31, 2018. Excluding the impact of the unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives, the decrease for the year ended December 31, 2019 is primarily due to lower other revenue for receipt of insurance proceeds, higher vessel operating expenses, largely as a result of the higher maintenance expense and property tax and penalties, and higher administrative expenses. This was partially offset by the impact of higher operating income and lower interest expense included in our share of equity in earnings of joint ventures for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Interest Income. The following table sets forth details of our interest income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Interest income  $947   $725   $222 

 

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $0.9 million, an increase of $0.2 million from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Interest income is mainly related to cash balances and interest accrued on the advances to our joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The interest rate under the shareholder loans to our joint ventures is a fixed rate of 8.0% per year.

 

Interest Expense. The following table sets forth details of our interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Interest expense  $(25,128)  $(26,077)  $949 
Commitment fees   (381)   (37)   (344)
Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed   (2,361)   (700)   (1,661)
Amortization and gain (loss) on cash flow hedge   178        178 
Total interest expense  $(27,692)  $(26,814)  $(878)

 

Total interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $27.7 million, a decrease of $0.9 million from $26.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Interest expense consists of the interest incurred, commitment fees, amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed and amortization and gain on cash flow hedge.

 

The interest incurred of $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased by $1.0 million compared to $26.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, principally due to repayment between periods of the outstanding loan balances for the loan facility related to the PGN FSRU Lampung (the "Lampung facility").

 

Commitment fees were $0.38 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $0.34 million from $0.04 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The higher commitment fee relates to the undrawn portion of the $63 million revolving credit tranche of the $385 million facility which was undrawn from January 31, 2019, or the inception of the facility, until August 12, 2019 when $48.3 million was drawn. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the commitment fees relate to the undrawn portion of the $85 million revolving credit facility. On January 29, 2018, the revolving credit facility was amended to eliminate the requirement to repay a commitment fee on the undrawn balance of the facility as of that date.

 

Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $2.4 million compared to $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed was mainly a result of the refinancing and repayment of the loan facility financing the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace (the “Gallant/Grace facility”) with the $385 million facility on January 31, 2019. Payment of debt issuance costs was $5.8 million, which was deferred, is amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the $385 million facility. As further discussed below, the amortization of the fair value of debt assumed related to the Gallant/Grace facility also ceased.

 

Amortization and gain (loss) on cash flow hedge was $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. As a result of adopting the revised guidance for Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities on January 1, 2019 on a prospective basis, those amounts related to cash flow hedges are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item when the hedged item affects earnings. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Amortization amounts reclassified to or recorded to earnings and the gain on settlement for our interest rate swaps are presented as a component of interest expense compared with the presentation in previous periods in the gain (loss) on derivatives instruments line item in our consolidated statements of income. Refer to notes 2 and 17 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

108

 

 

Gain (Loss) on Debt Extinguishment. The following table sets forth details of our gain (loss) on debt extinguishment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment  $1,030   $   $1,030 

 

Gain on debt extinguishment for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $1.0 million, an increase of $1.0 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Gain on debt extinguishment for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to the repayment of the Gallant/Grace facility on January 31, 2019. The unamortized amounts related to the fair value of debt assumed, or premium, recognized in relation to the acquisitions of the entities owning the Höegh Gallant on October 1, 2015 and the entities owning the Höegh Grace on January 1, 2017, of approximately $1.0 million, which was recognized as a gain on January 31, 2019 due to the extinguishment of the Gallant/Grace facility.

 

Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments. The following table sets forth details of our gain (loss) on derivative instruments for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments  $   $4,681   $(4,681)

 

As discussed under interest expense above, the gain (loss) on derivative instruments for cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2019, is presented as a component of interest expense. Gain on derivative instruments for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $4.7 million. Gain on derivative instruments for the year ended 2018 related to the interest rate swaps for the Lampung and the Gallant/Grace facilities. The main reason for gain on derivative instruments was the gain of $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 which relates to the reclassification to earnings from other comprehensive income of the discontinued cash flow hedge related to the Gallant/Grace facility that was planned to be refinanced, and which was subsequently refinanced, in January 2019. The accumulated other comprehensive income balance for the cash flow hedge is reclassified to earnings once the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to occur. The remaining net gain of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes the amortization loss excluded from hedge effectiveness reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and the loss on the ineffective portion of the cash flow hedges.

 

Other Items, Net. The following table sets forth details of our other items for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  $(396)  $(193)  $(203)
Bank charges, fees and other   (297)   (143)   (154)
Withholding tax on interest expense and other   (2,882)   (2,571)   (311)
Total other items, net  $(3,575)  $(2,907)  $(668)

 

Other items, net for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $3.6 million, an increase of $0.7 million from $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase is mainly due higher withholding tax on interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Withholding tax is primarily payable on interest expense to parties outside of Singapore and Indonesia.

 

109

 

 

Income (Loss) Before Tax. The following table sets forth details of our income before tax for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Income (loss) before tax  $60,016   $85,927   $(25,911)

 

Income before tax for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $60.0 million, a decrease of $25.9 million from $85.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Excluding all the unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, income before tax for the year ended December 31, 2019 would have been $65.2 million, a decrease of $7.6 million from $72.8 million for year ended December 31, 2018. Excluding the unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, the decrease is primarily due to lower other revenue for receipt of insurance proceeds and higher vessel operating and administration expenses which was partially offset by the higher results from equity in earnings of joint ventures and the gain on debt extinguishment.

 

Income Tax Expense. The following table sets forth details of our income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Income tax expense  $(7,275)  $(8,305)  $1,030 

 

Income tax expense was $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The major reason for the decrease was the tax impact of the deduction for the Indonesian property tax in 2019.

 

We are not subject to Marshall Islands corporate income taxes. However, we are subject to tax for earnings of our subsidiaries incorporated in Singapore, Indonesia, Cyprus and the UK and for certain Colombian source income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the tax expense principally related to subsidiaries in Indonesia, Singapore and Colombia. The Singapore subsidiary’s taxable income mainly arises from internal interest income. The charterer in Colombia pays certain taxes directly to the Colombian tax authorities on behalf of the Partnership’s subsidiaries that own and operate the Höegh Grace. The tax payments are a mechanism for advance collection of part of the income taxes for the Colombian subsidiary and a final income tax on Colombian source income for the non-Colombian subsidiary. We concluded these third-party payments to the tax authorities represent income taxes that must be accounted for under the guidance for income taxes. The amount of non-cash income tax expense was $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

In December of 2018, the Indonesian tax authorities concluded an audit of corporate income tax filings for the Indonesian subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. The outcome of the audit reduced the historical tax loss carryforward, mainly due to disallowed expenses, resulting in a settlement of $0.9 million with respect to the unrecognized tax benefits originating in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2018, tax benefits of $0.4 million were recorded reflecting a reduction to the uncertain tax position originating in 2013 based on the audit's conclusion. In addition, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $0.4 million for a tax position taken in the 2018 tax return which was not more-likely-than-not to be sustained.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $0.6 million for a tax position to be taken in the 2019 tax return which is not more-likely-than-not to be sustained. As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized tax benefits were $2.3 million. Refer to note 7 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

110

 

 

Net Income (Loss). The following table sets forth details of our net income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

           Positive 
   Year ended December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Net income (loss)  $52,741   $77,622   $(24,881)
Preferred unitholders' in net income   13,850    12,303    1,547 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $38,891   $65,319   $(26,428)

 

As a result of the foregoing, net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $52.7 million, a decrease of $24.9 million compared with net income of $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, net income of $13.9 million and $12.3 million, respectively, was attributable to the holders of the Series A preferred units, an increase of $1.6 million due to additional preferred units issued as part of our at-the-market offering program. Our limited partners' interest in net income, for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $38.9 million, a decrease of $26.4 million compared to $65.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Segments

 

There are two operating segments. The segment profit measure is Segment EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and other financial items (gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other items, net). Segment EBITDA is reconciled to operating income and net income in the segment presentation below. Please read “Item 3.A. Selected Financial Data—Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a definition of Segment EBITDA and a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to net income. The two segments are “Majority held FSRUs” and “Joint venture FSRUs.” In addition, unallocated corporate costs, interest income from advances to joint ventures, and interest expense related to the outstanding balances on the $85 million revolving credit facility and the $385 million facility are included in “Other.”

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, Majority held FSRUs includes the financing lease related to the PGN FSRU Lampung and the operating leases related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, Joint venture FSRUs include the operating leases related to two 50% owned FSRUs, the Neptune and the Cape Ann, that operate under long term time charters with one charterer.

 

The accounting policies applied to the segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements, except that i) Joint venture FSRUs are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note in the Partnership's consolidated financial statements and under equity accounting for the consolidated financial statements, ii) internal interest income and interest expense between the Partnership's subsidiaries that eliminate in consolidation are not included in the segment columns for the other financial income (expense), net line and iii) non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is subtracted in the segment note to reflect the Partnership’s interest in Segment EBITDA as the Partnership’s segment profit measure, Segment EBITDA. Under the proportional consolidation method, 50% of the Joint venture FSRUs’ revenues, expenses and assets are reflected in the segment note. Management monitors the results of operations of joint ventures under the proportional consolidation method and not the equity method of accounting. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership began consolidating its acquired 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Since the Partnership obtained control of the Höegh Grace entities, it consolidated 100% of the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of the Höegh Grace entities and the interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity. Management monitored the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities based on the Partnership’s 51% interest in Segment EBITDA of such entities and, therefore, subtracted the non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to present Segment EBITDA. The adjustment to non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA was reversed to reconcile to operating income and net income in the segment presentation. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there is no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

111

 

 

Majority Held FSRUs. The following table sets forth details of segment results for the Majority held FSRUs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

   Year ended   Positive 
Majority Held FSRUs  December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Time charter revenues  $145,321   $144,952   $369 
Other revenue   115    1,609    (1,494)
Total revenues   145,436    146,561    (1,125)
Vessel operating expenses   (30,870)   (24,195)   (6,675)
Administrative expenses   (3,396)   (3,099)   (297)
Segment EBITDA   111,170    119,267    (8,097)
Depreciation and amortization   (21,477)   (21,146)   (331)
Operating income (loss)   89,693    98,121    (8,428)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   1,030        1,030 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments       4,681    (4,681)
Other financial income (expense), net   (12,511)   (26,381)   13,870 
Income (loss) before tax   78,212    76,421    1,791 
Income tax expense   (7,278)   (8,253)   975 
Net income (loss)  $70,934   $68,168   $2,766 
Limited partners' and preferred unitholders' interest in net income (loss)  $70,934   $68,168   $2,766 

 

Time charter revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $145.3 million, an increase of $0.4 million from $144.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. As discussed above, the increase was mainly due to higher time charter revenue for the Höegh Grace, which was partially offset by lower revenues for the PGN FSRU Lampung. The time charter revenues were also slightly higher for the Höegh Gallant. The increase in revenues for the Höegh Grace related to higher reimbursable costs for the year ended December 31, 2019. Time charter revenues for the PGN FSRU Lampung were impacted in both the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 by the conclusion of audits by the charterer of the final amounts that would be reimbursed for prior year expenses which resulted in the recognition of revenue that was previously considered constrained variable consideration. However, the additional revenue recognized for reimbursement of prior year expenses was lower for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018. Refer to note 5 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information. Time charter revenues for the Höegh Gallant increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 as the combination of performance claims and off-hire which was somewhat lower in 2019 than in 2018.

 

Other revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 consists of insurance proceeds received for a claim related to the PGN FSRU Lampung's warranty work from prior periods the insurance recovery for 2018 repair expenses incurred for the Höegh Gallant.

 

Vessel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $30.9 million compared to $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The higher expenses were mainly due to maintenance expenses of approximately $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, principally for the Höegh Gallant but also for the PGN FSRU Lampung. During the scheduled drydock of the Höegh Gallant and the on-water survey of the PGN FSRU Lampung, the opportunity was utilized to complete as many maintenance procedures as possible. For the year ended December 31, 2018, vessel operating expenses included repair expenses incurred for the Höegh Gallant due to technical issues in the fourth quarter of 2018. In addition, vessel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 included $3.0 million of Indonesian property tax and penalties that was assessed on the PGN FSRU Lampung for the years 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was as a result of the issuance of a new regulation in 2019, defining FSRUs as subject to the existing Indonesian property tax law.  

 

Administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $3.4 million, an increase of $0.3 million from $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase reflects higher administrative expenses for the entity operating the PGN FSRU Lampung, in part due to legal and advisor fees incurred in consultations related to the assessment of property tax.  

 

112

 

 

Segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $111.2 million, a decrease of $8.1 million from $119.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was mainly due to increased maintenance expenses and the retroactively assessed property tax.

 

Joint Venture FSRUs. The following table sets forth details of segment results for the Joint venture FSRUs for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   Year ended   Positive 
Joint Venture FSRUs  December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Time charter revenues  $42,433   $43,169   $(736)
Vessel operating expenses   (7,698)   (9,310)   1,612 
Administrative expenses   (1,346)   (1,622)   276 
Segment EBITDA   33,389    32,237    1,152 
Depreciation and amortization   (10,030)   (9,725)   (305)
Operating income (loss)   23,359    22,512    847 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments   (5,209)   8,496    (13,705)
Other income (expense), net   (12,072)   (13,070)   998 
Income (loss) before tax   6,078    17,938    (11,860)
Income tax expense            
Net income (loss) and limited partners' and preferred unitholders' interest in net income (loss)  $6,078   $17,938   $(11,860)

 

Time charter revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $42.4 million, a decrease of $0.8 million compared to $43.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Lower time charter revenues mainly reflect lower reimbursement of costs incurred for maintenance and projects for the charterer which was partially offset by higher amortization of deferred revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the higher amortization of deferred revenue mainly related to costs reimbursed by the charterer for the vessel modifications and drydock completed in 2018 for the Cape Ann

 

As further discussed in note 18 under "Joint ventures claims and accruals" of our consolidated financial statements, in 2017 the joint ventures recorded accruals for the probable liability for boil-off claims under the Neptune and the Cape Ann time charters. Our 50% share of the accrual was estimated at approximately $11.9 million which was recorded as a reduction of time charter revenues as of September 30, 2017. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019.

 

Vessel operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $7.7 million, a decrease of $1.6 million compared to $9.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease in vessel operating expenses was mainly due to lower costs incurred for maintenance for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Neptune completed an on-water class renewal survey. As a result, vessel operating expenses were somewhat higher reflecting routine maintenance completed during the survey. The Neptune was on-hire during the class renewal period. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the higher vessel operating expenses related to the Cape Ann. The Cape Ann commenced drydock, maintenance and modifications work in August 2018 and left the shipyard at the end of September 2018 resulting in increased maintenance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018. The Cape Ann was on-hire during the drydock period.

 

Administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $1.3 million, a decrease of $0.3 million compared to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The lower administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2019 were mainly due to a new project during the year ended December 31, 2018, for the charterer and the administrative procedures for the drydock and modifications work related to the Cape Ann.

 

Segment EBITDA was $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $1.2 million compared with $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The main reason for the increase was reduced vessel operating expenses, as described above.

 

113

 

 

Other. The following table sets forth details of other results of Other for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

   Year ended   Positive 
Other  December 31,   (negative) 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   variance 
Administrative expenses  $(6,465)  $(5,817)  $(648)
Segment EBITDA   (6,465)   (5,817)   (648)
Operating income (loss)   (6,465)   (5,817)   (648)
Other financial income (expense), net   (17,809)   (2,615)   (15,194)
Income (loss) before tax   (24,274)   (8,432)   (15,842)
Income tax benefit (expense)   3    (52)   55 
Net income (loss) & limited partners' and preferred unitholders' interest in net income (loss)  $(24,271)  $(8,484)  $(15,787)

 

Administrative expenses and Segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2019 were each $6.5 million, an increase of $0.7 million from $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The increase in administrative expenses of $0.7 million in 2019 was principally related to higher audit and legal fees. The increase in audit fees primarily relate to the first audit of our internal control over financial reporting. As a result of our status as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, we had an initial exemption from having an audit performed on our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Other financial income (expense), net, which is not part of the segment measure of profits, is related to the interest income accrued on the advances to our joint ventures and interest expenses related to the $85 million revolving credit facility from Höegh LNG. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2019, other financial income (expense), net also includes interest expense, consisting of interest incurred, commitment fees and amortization of debt issuance costs, related to the $385 million facility drawn on January 31, 2019 with no comparable expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018. 

 

Other financial income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2019 was an expense of $17.8 million, an increase of $15.2 million from an expense of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 principally as a result of drawing on the $385 million facility.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the drawn balance on the revolving credit tranche under the $385 million facility was $48.3 million. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below as well as note 13 of our consolidated financial statements for more information on the refinancing of the Gallant/Grace facility and the new $385 million facility.

 

A comparison of year ended December 31, 2019 with year ended 31 December 2017 is included in Item 5, Section A Operating results of the 20-F filed on Edgar for year ended 31 December 2018.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2017

  

See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Operating Results – Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2017" in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 (our "2018 20-F") for a discussion of our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 and other financial information related to the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

114

 

 

  B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Liquidity and Cash Needs

 

We operate in a capital-intensive industry, and we expect to finance the purchase of additional vessels and other capital expenditures through a combination of cash from operations, the utilization of borrowings from commercial banks and debt and equity financings. Our liquidity requirements relate to paying our unitholder distributions, servicing interest and quarterly repayments on our debt (“debt amortization”), funding working capital, funding on-water surveys or drydocking and maintaining cash reserves against fluctuations in operating cash flows. The liquidity requirements of our joint ventures relate to the servicing of debt, including repayment of shareholder loans, funding the settlement of the boil-off claim, funding working capital, including drydocking and on-water surveys, and maintaining cash reserves against fluctuations in operating cash flows. 

 

Our sources of liquidity include cash balances, cash flows from our operations, interest payments from our advances to our joint ventures, our undrawn balance of $76.2 million under the $85 million revolving credit facility from Höegh LNG and our undrawn balance of $14.7 million under the $63 million revolving credit tranche of our $385 million facility, as further described below. In addition, liquidity can also be supplemented, from time to time, by net proceeds of the ATM program, depending on market conditions. Cash and cash equivalents are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars. We do not currently use derivative instruments for other purposes than managing interest rate risks. The advances to our joint ventures (accrued interest from prior periods on repaid shareholder loans) are subordinated to the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, consisting of the Neptune facility and the Cape Ann facility. Under terms of the shareholder loan agreements, the repayments shall be prioritized over any dividend payment to the owners of the joint ventures. As discussed in note 18 under "Joint ventures claims and accruals" to our consolidated financial statements and further below, the joint ventures have recorded accruals for the probable liability for boil-off claim under the time charters. As a precaution, the joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans as of September 30, 2017 pending the outcome of the boil-off claim since the amounts and timing of a potential settlement were not clear. The suspension of the payments on the shareholder loans reduces cash flows available to us. Dividend distributions from our joint ventures require a) agreement of the other joint venture owners; b) fulfilment of requirements of the long-term bank loans (refer to note 10 of our consolidated financial statements); and c) under Cayman Islands law may be paid out of profits or capital reserves subject to the joint venture being solvent after the distribution. Dividends from Höegh Lampung may only be paid out of profits under Singapore law. Dividends from PT Höegh may only be paid if its retained earnings are positive under Indonesian law and requirements are fulfilled under the Lampung facility. In addition, PT Höegh, as an Indonesian incorporated company, is required to establish a statutory reserve equal to 20% of its paid in capital. The dividend can only be distributed if PT Höegh’s retained earnings are positive after deducting the statutory reserve. As of December 31, 2019, PT Höegh had not established the required statutory reserves and therefore cannot make dividend payments under Indonesia law. Under the Lampung facility, there are limitations on cash dividends and loan distributions that can be made to us. Subject to meeting a debt service coverage ratio of 1.20 to 1.00, PT Höegh can distribute cash from its cash flow from operations to us as payment of intercompany accrued interest and/or intercompany debt, after quarterly payments of the Lampung facility and fulfilment of the “waterfall” provisions to meet operating requirements as defined by the Lampung facility. Under Cayman Islands law, Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia Holding may only pay distributions out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distribution. Dividends from Höegh Cyprus may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company. Dividends and other distributions from Höegh Cyprus, Höegh Colombia and Höegh FSRU IV may only be distributed if after the dividend payment, the Partnership would remain in compliance with the financial covenants under the $385 million facility.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 496,520 Series A preferred units under our ATM program at an average gross sales price of $26.79 per unit and received net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $13.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold 53,160 common units under our ATM program at an average gross sales price of $19.60 per unit and received net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $1.0 million. We have paid an aggregate of $0.2 million in sales commissions to the Agent in connection with such sales for the year ended December 31, 2019. From the commencement of the Prior ATM program in January 2018 through December 31, 2019, we sold 2,025,590 Series A preferred units and 306,266 common units and received net proceeds of $51.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The compensation paid to the Agent for such sales was $1.0 million.

 

For the period from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020, we sold 82,409 Series A preferred units under our ATM program at an average gross sales price of $26.25 per unit and received net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $2.1 million.

 

115

 

 

As of December 31, 2019, we did not have material commitments for capital expenditures for our current business. However, the joint ventures have a probable liability for a boil-off claim under the time charters for which an accrual of $23.7 million was recorded as of December 31, 2019. The Partnership’s 50% share of the accrual was approximately $11.9 million as of December 31, 2019. The claim has been subject to an arbitration process. The parties have continued discussions with the objective of reaching a negotiated solution to settle the boil-off dispute. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the signature date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims. The joint ventures expect to pay the boil-off settlement with accumulated cash and certain restricted cash balances on the joint ventures’ respective balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and with cash flows from operations in 2020. Refer to note 9 in our consolidated financial statements.

 

The Partnership will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for its share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement. The remaining costs to be incurred for the technical modifications of the vessels are estimated to be $0.8 million, of which the Partnership’s 50% share would be $0.4 million. Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for the Partnership’s share of such costs. Refer to note 18 under "Joint ventures claims and accruals" in our consolidated financial statements.

 

As discussed in “Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2018Time Charter Revenues” above,

we exercised the right on February 27, 2020 to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the current charter in April 2020 until July 2025. We intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by our conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to us under the indemnifications for the boil-off settlement and the Subsequent Charter may be affected by events beyond either of the control of Höegh LNG or us, including opportunities to obtain new employment for the Höegh Gallant and prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, Höegh LNG’s ability to meet its obligations to us may be impaired. If Höegh LNG is unable to meet its obligations to us under the indemnifications for the boil-off settlement or the Subsequent Charter, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders could be materially adversely affected. 

 

The recent outbreak of Coronavirus has negatively affected economic conditions in many parts of the world which may impact our operations and the operations of our customers and suppliers. Although our operations have not been affected by the Coronavirus outbreak to date, the ultimate length and severity of the Coronavirus outbreak is uncertain at this time. We believe our primary risk and exposure related to uncertainty of cash flows from our long-term time charter contracts is due to the credit risk associated with the individual charterers. Payments are due under time charter contracts regardless of the demand for the charterers’ gas output or the utilization of the FSRU. It is therefore possible that charterers may not make payments for time charter invoices in times of reduced demand. Furthermore, should there be an outbreak of the Coronavirus on board one of our FSRUs or an inability to replace critical supplies or replacement parts due to disruptions to third-party suppliers, adequate crewing or supplies may not be available to fulfill our obligations under our time charter contracts. This could result in off-hire or warranty payments under performance guarantees which would reduce revenues for the impacted period. In addition, if financial institutions providing our interest rate swaps or lenders under our revolving credit facility are unable to meet their obligations, we could experience higher interest expense or be unable to obtain funding. If our charterers or lenders are unable to meet their obligations to us under their respective contracts or if we are unable to fulfill our obligations under our time charter contracts, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders could be materially adversely affected. We do not have long-term debt maturing in the next twelve months. However, the Lampung facility must be refinanced in 2021. Should we be unable to obtain refinancing for the Lampung facility in 2021, we may not have sufficient funds or other assets to satisfy all of our obligations, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

As discussed in note 18 under "Indonesian property tax" of our consolidated financial statements, the Partnership's Indonesian subsidiary was assessed a property tax and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was due to the issuance of new Indonesian regulations which define an FSRU as a “Building” subject to the existing property tax law. The property tax and penalties were paid in February 2020 from our cash flows from operations. Our Indonesian subsidiary expects it will be required to pay an annual property tax of approximately $0.6 million in 2020.

 

116

 

 

On January 29, 2019, we entered into a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks to refinance the outstanding balances of the Gallant/Grace facility. The new facility includes a senior secured term loan and revolving credit facilities with an aggregate borrowing capacity of the lesser of (i) $385 million and (ii) 65% of the fair market value of the Höegh Gallant and 75% of the market value of the Höegh Grace as of the initial borrowing date. The $385 million facility is structured as a term loan with commercial and export credit tranches for each vessel and a revolving credit tranche for the Partnership with a drawing capacity of $63 million. On January 31, 2019, we drew $320 million under the commercial and the export credit tranches on the $385 million facility and used proceeds of $303.2 million and $1.6 million to settle the outstanding balance and accrued interest, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility and $5.5 million to pay arrangement fees (debt issuance cost) under the $385 million facility. The remaining proceeds of $9.6 million were used for general partnership purposes. On August 12, 2019, we drew $48.3 million on the revolving credit tranche under the $385 million facility.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the total outstanding principal on our long-term debt was $474.9 million related to the Lampung facility, the $385 million facility, including the associated $63 million revolving credit tranche, and the $85 million revolving credit facility. The book value of our total long-term debt was $465.8 million as of December 31, 2019. On May 28, 2019, the repayment date on the $85 million revolving credit facility was extended to January 1, 2023 and the terms amended for the interest rate to be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.4% in 2019, 3.0% in 2020 and 4.0% thereafter. Refer to “—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt” for a description of the facilities and notes 13 and 15 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

As of December 31, 2019, we had outstanding interest rate swap agreements for a total notional amount of $362.9 million to hedge against the interest rate risks of our long-term debt under the Lampung facility and the $385 million facility. We apply hedge accounting for derivative instruments related to those facilities. We receive interest based on three-month US dollar LIBOR and pay a fixed rate of 2.8% for the Lampung facility. We receive interest based on the three-month US dollar LIBOR and pay a fixed rate ranging from 2.650% to 2.941% for the $385 million facility. The carrying value of the liability for derivative instruments was a net liability of $14.9 million as of December 31, 2019. Refer to “Item 5.F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” and note 17 of our consolidated financial statements. In addition, our joint ventures have utilized interest rate swap contracts that are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. Refer to note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for the carrying value of the liabilities for derivative instruments of our joint ventures.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of $39.1 million. Current restricted cash for operating obligations of the PGN FSRU Lampung was $8.0 million and long-term restricted cash required under the Lampung facility was $12.6 million as of December 31, 2019. The long-term debt is repayable in quarterly installments of $11.2 million starting with the first repayment under the $385 million facility in April 2019. As of March 31, 2020, the Partnership had undrawn balances of $76.2 million and $14.7 million on the $85 million revolving credit facility and $63 million revolving credit tranche, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership's total current liabilities exceeded total current assets by $3.5 million. This is partly a result of the current portion of long-term debt of $44.7 million being classified as current while restricted cash of $12.6 million associated with the Lampung facility is classified as long-term. The current portion of long-term debt reflects principal payments for the next twelve months which will be funded, for the most part, by future cash flows from operations. The Partnership does not intend to maintain a cash balance to fund the next twelve months' net liabilities.

 

We believe our cash flows from operations, including distributions to us from PT Höegh, Höegh Cyprus, and Höegh FSRU IV as payment of intercompany interest and/or intercompany debt or dividends, will be sufficient to meet our debt amortization and working capital needs and maintain cash reserves against fluctuations in operating cash flows. In addition, we require liquidity to pay distributions to our unitholders. We believe the available balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility and the $63 million revolving credit tranche will provide us with adequate liquidity reserve to fund our distributions and other general liquidity needs. We believe our current resources, including the undrawn balances on the revolving credit facility and tranche, are sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for our current business for the next twelve months.

 

Generally, our long-term source of funds will be cash from operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt and equity financings. Because we will distribute all of our available cash, we expect that we will rely principally upon external financing sources, including bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund acquisitions and other expansion capital expenditures.

 

For information regarding estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures impacting our cash distributions, refer to “Item 8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—The Partnership’s Cash Distribution Policy—Estimated Maintenance and Replacement Capital Expenditures.”

 

117

 

 

Cash Flows

  

The following table summarizes our net cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities and our cash and cash equivalents for the years presented:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  $85,252   $91,681   $79,947 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (269)   3,067    (38,450)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   (70,625)   (92,478)   (39 340) 
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   14,358    2,270    2,157 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   7    (97)    
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period   45,454    43,281    41,124 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period  $59,819   $45,454   $43,281 

 

Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018

 

 Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $85.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with $91.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Before changes in working capital, net cash flows from operating activities were $82.1 million and $85.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease of $3.6 million was primarily due to higher maintenance expenses in the Majority held FSRU segment and the capitalized expenditure for drydocking related to the Höegh Gallant which was partially offset by the positive impact of including of receipts of repayment on principal on the financing lease as a component of operating activities as a result of the new leasing standard adopted in 2019 compared with the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new leasing standard using the optional transition method to apply the new standard at the transition date of January 1, 2019 with no retrospective adjustments to prior periods. As of January 1, 2019, cash payments received for the principal portion of the financing lease are presented as an operating cash inflow rather than as an investing cash inflow as presented for prior periods in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

Changes in working capital increased net cash provided by operating activities by $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the positive contribution of changes in working capital was largely due to cash provided by increased value added and withholding tax liability and other accrued liabilities. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the positive contribution of changes in working capital was largely due to cash provided by the settlements of trade receivables.

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with net cash provided by investing activities of $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The main reason for the decrease was the reclassification of the receipts from repayment on principal on the financing lease from investing activities in 2018 to operating activities in 2019 due to adoption of the new leasing standard as further described above. Cash used in investing activities of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was comprised of expenditures for vessel and other equipment. Cash provided by investing activities of $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 included $0.7 million in expenditures for vessel and other equipment and $3.8 million in receipts of repayment on principal on the financing lease.

 

118

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $70.6 million and $92.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was mainly due to the repayment of long-term debt of $342.4 million, which includes repayment of $19.1 million on the Lampung facility, repayment of $19.2 million on the $385 million facility, repayment of $0.9 million on the export credit tranche of the Gallant facility on January 29, 2019, and a settlement of $303.2 million of the remaining outstanding balance on the Gallant/Grace facility on January 31, 2019, payment of $5.8 million in debt issuance costs under the $385 million facility, repayment of $34.0 million on the $85 million revolving credit facility, our payment of cash distributions to our common and subordinated unitholders of $60.1 million and our payment of cash distributions to the holders of our Series A preferred units of $13.7 million. This was partially offset by receipt of $368.3 million in proceeds from long-term debt, including $320.0 million under the $385 million facility and $48.3 million on the revolving credit tranche under the $385 million facility, proceeds of $3.5 million under the $85 million revolving credit facility, and proceeds of $1.0 million and $13.1 million for the issuance of common and Series A preferred units, respectively, under our ATM program.

 

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was mainly due to the repayment of $45.5 million on the Lampung, Gallant and Grace facilities, the repayment of $17.5 million to owners and affiliates on the $85 million revolving credit facility, the repayment of $5.0 million for part of a customer loan that funded value added taxes for import of the PGN FSRU Lampung, a payment of $59.4 million of cash distributions to our common and subordinated unitholders, a payment of $13.1 million of cash distributions to our Series A preferred unitholders and the refund of indemnifications of $2.4 million previously received from Höegh LNG. This was partially offset by the receipt of $5.4 million drawn on the $85 million revolving credit facility and net proceeds of $4.6 million and $38.7 million for the issuance of common units and Series A preferred units, respectively, under our ATM program.

 

Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

 

See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Cash Flows – Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017" in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 (our "2018 20-F") for a discussion of changes in our cash flows from 2017 to 2018 and other financial information related to the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

Borrowing Activities

 

Revolving Credit Facility Due to Owners and Affiliates

 

The following table sets forth the revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   As of December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates  $8,792   $39,292 

 

Revolving Credit Facility with Höegh LNG

 

In connection with the IPO, we entered into an $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG.

 

On February 28, 2016, the maturity date of the $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG was extended to January 1, 2020, unless otherwise terminated due to an event of default. Interest on drawn amounts is payable quarterly at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 4.0%. Originally, we are required to pay a 1.4% annual commitment fee, payable quarterly, to Höegh LNG on undrawn available amounts under the revolving credit facility. On January 29, 2018, the revolving credit facility was amended eliminating the requirement to pay a commitment fee on the undrawn balance of the facility. On May 28, 2019, the repayment date on the $85 million revolving credit facility was extended to January 1, 2023 and the terms amended for the interest rate to be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.4% in 2019, 3.0% in 2020 and 4.0% thereafter.  Drawings on the revolving credit facility are subject to customary conditions precedent, including absence of a default or event of default and accuracy of representations and warranties in all material respects. 

 

119

 

 

The revolving credit facility identifies various events of default that may trigger acceleration and cancellation of the facility, such as:

 

  · failure to repay principal and interest;
     
  · inaccuracy of representations and warranties;

 

  · cross-default to other indebtedness held by us or our subsidiaries; and

 

  · bankruptcy and certain other insolvency events.

 

Long-term Debt

 

The following table sets forth our long-term debt as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   As of December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Lampung facility:          
Export credit tranche  $94,210   $109,096 
FSRU tranche   22,812    26,988 
Gallant facility:          
Commercial tranche       111,264 
Export credit tranche       29,333 
Grace facility:          
Commercial tranche       135,813 
Export credit tranche       27,750 
$385 million facility:          
Commercial tranche   249,635     
Export credit tranche   51,167     
Revolving credit tranche   48,300     
Outstanding principal   466,124    440,244 
Lampung facility unamortized debt issuance cost   (4,309)   (5,809)
$385 million facility unamortized debt issuance cost   (4,854)    
Gallant facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed       215 
Grace facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed       895 
Total debt   456,961    435,545 
Less: Current portion of long-term debt   (44,660)   (45,458)
Long-term debt  $412,301   $390,087 

 

Refer to “Item 5.F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” and note 13 of our consolidated financial statements for the maturity profile of the debt.

 

Lampung facility

 

In September 2013, PT Höegh (the “Borrower”) entered into a secured $299 million term loan facility (the “Lampung facility”) with a syndicate of banks and an export credit agency for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring. Höegh LNG is the guarantor for the Lampung facility. The facility was drawn in installments as construction was completed. The term loan facility includes two commercial tranches, the FSRU tranche and the Mooring tranche, and the export credit tranche. The interest rates vary by tranche. The full principal amount on the Mooring tranche and accrued interest was repaid in 2014.

 

The FSRU tranche has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.4%. The interest rate for the export credit tranche is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.3%. The FSRU tranche is repayable quarterly over 7 years with a final balloon payment of $16.5 million. The export credit tranche is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years assuming the balloon payment of the FSRU tranche is refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the outstanding balance upon maturity of the FSRU tranche. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 6.2% and 5.9% respectively.  

 

120

 

 

The primary financial covenants under the Lampung facility are as follows:

 

  § Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the preceding nine-month period tested on each quarterly repayment date;
  § Höegh LNG’s book equity must be greater than the higher of (i) $200 million and (ii) 25% of total assets; and
  § Höegh LNG’s free liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents or available draws on credit facilities) must be greater than $20 million.

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Borrower and the guarantor were in compliance with the financial covenants.

 

Höegh LNG, as guarantor, has issued the following guarantees related to the Lampung facility that remain in effect as of December 31, 2019: (a) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for the repayment of the balloon repayment installment of the FSRU tranche callable only at final maturity of the FSRU tranche; (b) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for all amounts due in respect of the export credit agent in the event that the export credit agent exercises its prepayment right for the export credit tranche if the FSRU tranche is not refinanced; and (c) undertaking that, if the time charter is terminated for an event of vessel force majeure, that under certain conditions, a guarantee will be provided for the outstanding debt, less insurance proceeds for vessel force majeure. In addition, all project agreements and guarantees are assigned to the bank syndicate and the export credit agent, all cash accounts and the shares in PT Höegh and Höegh Lampung are pledged in favor of the bank syndicate and the export credit agent.

 

The Lampung facility requires cash reserves that are held for specifically designated uses, including working capital, operations and maintenance and debt service reserves. Distributions are subject to “waterfall” provisions that allocate revenues to specified priorities of use (such as operating expenses, scheduled debt service, targeted debt service reserves and any other reserves) with the remaining cash being distributable only on certain dates and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including meeting a 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio, no default or event of default then continuing or resulting from such distribution and the guarantor not being in breach of the financial covenants applicable to it. The Lampung facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower to change its business, sell or grant liens on its property including the PGN FSRU Lampung, incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness, make investments or acquisitions, enter into intercompany transactions and make distributions.   

 

The Lampung facility identifies various events that may trigger mandatory reduction, prepayment and cancellation of the facility, including total loss or sale of the PGN FSRU Lampung. The Lampung facility contains customary events of default such as:

 

change of ownership;

 

inaccuracy of representations and warranties;

 

failure to repay principal and interest;

 

failure to comply with the financial or insurance covenants;

 

cross-default to other indebtedness held by Höegh LNG or PT Höegh;

 

bankruptcy and other insolvency events at Höegh LNG or PT Höegh;

 

occurrence of certain litigation events at Höegh LNG or PT Höegh;

 

the occurrence of a material adverse effect in respect of Höegh LNG, PT Höegh or the charterer;

 

breach by the contractor of any technical services agreement, master maintenance agreement or a master parts agreement pertaining to the vessel;

 

termination or breach of the charter; and

 

cross-default to certain material project contracts.

 

121

 

 

Gallant/Grace Facility

 

On October 1, 2015, the Partnership acquired Höegh FSRU III, the entity that owned Höegh Cyprus, which owns the Höegh Gallant. Höegh Cyprus, together with Höegh FSRU IV, the owner of the Höegh Grace, are borrowers (the “Borrowers”) under a term loan facility (the “Gallant/Grace facility”) with a syndicate of banks and an export credit agency for the purpose of financing a portion of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. The facility was secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, an assignment of the Hoegh Cyprus’s, EgyptCo’s, Höegh FSRU IV’s and Höegh Colombia’s rights under their respective time charters, the assignment of a bank guarantee for the performance of EGAS under the time charter and a pledge of the Borrowers' and EgyptCo’s cash accounts. The Partnership provided a pledge of its shares in Höegh FSRU III, Hoegh Cyprus and Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and Höegh LNG provided a pledge of its shares in EgyptCo as security for the facility. Höegh Colombia Holding provided a pledge of its shares in Höegh FSRU IV. as security for the facility. Höegh LNG, Höegh Colombia Holding, Höegh FSRU III and the Partnership were guarantors for the facility.

 

On January 31, 2019, the outstanding balance and accrued interest of $303.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility was repaid from the proceeds of the $385 million facility. The unamortized balance of the fair value of debt assumed, or premium, was recorded as a gain when the debt was extinguished.  

 

$385 million Facility

 

On January 29, 2019, the Partnership entered a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks to refinance the outstanding balances of the Gallant/Grace facility. Partnership is the borrower (the “Borrower”) for the senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility (the “$385 million facility”). The aggregate borrowing capacity is $320 million on the senior secured term loan and $63 million on the revolving credit tranche. Höegh Cyprus, which owns the Höegh Gallant, Höegh FSRU IV, the owner of the Höegh Grace, (collectively, the "Vessel Owners"), Höegh Colombia, and EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, are guarantors for the facility (collectively, the "guarantors"). The facility is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, an assignment of the Höegh LNG Cyprus’, EgyptCo’s, Höegh FSRU IV’s, Höegh Colombia’s rights under their respective time charters and earnings and a pledge of the Borrower’s and Guarantor’s cash accounts. The Partnership and its subsidiaries have provided a pledge of shares in Höegh Cyprus, Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia, and Höegh LNG has provided a pledge of its shares in EgyptCo as security for the facility.

 

The senior secured term loan related to the $385 million facility includes a commercial tranche and the export credit tranche. Each tranche is divided into two term loans for each of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace

 

On January 31, 2019, the Partnership drew $320 million under the commercial and the export credit tranches on the $385 million facility to settle $303.2 million and $1.6 million of the outstanding balance and accrued interest, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility and used proceeds of $5.5 million to pay arrangement fees due under the $385 million facility. The remaining proceeds of $9.6 million were used for general partnership purposes. On August 12, 2019, the Partnership drew $48.3 million under the revolving credit tranche on the $385 million facility, of which $34.0 million was used to repay part of the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility due to Höegh LNG.

 

The commercial tranche and the revolving credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.30%. The commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is approximately 1.6%. The interest rate for the export credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have fixed interest rates and guarantee commissions of 3.98% and 3.88% on the term loans related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, respectively. The commercial tranche is repayable quarterly with a final balloon payment of $136.1 million due in January 2026. The term loans for export credit tranche related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace are repayable in quarterly installments with the final payments in October 2026 and April 2028, respectively, assuming the balloon payments of the commercial tranches are refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the total outstanding balance on both the terms loans of the export credit tranche of $9.5 million upon maturity of the commercial tranche. Any outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility is due in full in January 2026. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 4.7%.

 

122

 

 

The primary financial covenants under the $385 million facility are as follows:

 

  · The Partnership must maintain

  o Consolidated book equity (excluding hedge reserves and mark to market value of derivatives) equal to the greater of

  § 25% of total assets, and

  § $150 million

  o Consolidated working capital (current assets, excluding intercompany receivables and marked-to-market value of any financial derivative, less current liabilities, excluding intercompany payables, marked-to-market value of any financial derivative and the current portion of long-term debt) shall at all times be greater than zero
  o Minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents and available draws under a bank credit facility for a term of more than 12 months) equal to the greater of

  § $15 million, and

  § $2.5 million multiplied by the number of vessels owned or leased by the Partnership (prorate for partial ownership), subject to a cap of $20 million

  o A ratio of combined EBITDA for the Vessel Owners to debt service (principal repayments, guarantee commission, commitment fees and interest expense) for the preceding twelve months of a minimum of 115%

 

As of December 31, 2019, the borrower and the Vessel Owners were in compliance with the financial covenants.

 

In addition, a security maintenance ratio based on the aggregate market value of the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace and any additional security must be at least 125% of the aggregate outstanding loan balance.

 

If the security maintenance ratio is not maintained, the relevant Borrower has 30 days to provide more security or to repay part of the loan to be in compliance with the ratio no later than 30 days after notice from the lenders.

 

Under the $385 million facility, cash accounts are freely available for the use of the Borrower and the guarantors, unless there is an event of default. Cash can be distributed as dividends or to service loans of owners and affiliates provided that after the distribution the Borrower and guarantors would remain in compliance with the financial covenants. The $385 million facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower and the guarantors to change their business, grant liens on the Höegh Gallant or the Höegh Grace, incur additional indebtedness that is not pari passu with the $385 million facility, enter into intercompany debt that is not subordinated to the $385 million facility and for the Vessel Owners to make investments or acquisitions.

 

The $385 million facility identifies various events that may trigger mandatory reduction, prepayment and cancellation of the facility, including total loss or sale of the Höegh Gallant or the Höegh Grace. The facility contains events of default such as:

 

  · failure to repay principal and interest;

 

  · failure to comply with the financial or insurance covenants;

 

  · inaccuracy of representations;

 

  · cross-default to other indebtedness held by the Partnership or any its subsidiaries;
     
  · bankruptcy and other insolvency events for the Partnership or the Guarantors;

 

  · occurrence of certain litigation events for the Partnership or the Guarantors;
     
  · expiration or termination of time charter contracts without replacement contracts meeting certain criteria; and

 

·change of control of Höegh LNG or the Partnership due to the failure of Höegh LNG to own at least 25% of our common units.

 

123

 

 

Joint Ventures Debt

 

The debt of our joint ventures is not consolidated on our consolidated financial statements, but it is included as a component in “Investment in and advances to joint ventures” on our consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

 

Loans Due to Owners (Shareholder Loans)

 

The loans due to owners consist of shareholder loans where the principal amounts, including accrued interest, are repaid based on available cash after servicing of long-term bank debt. As of December 31, 2019, our 50.0% share of the outstanding balance was $3.8 million. The shareholder loans are due not later than the 12th anniversary of the delivery date of each FSRU. The Neptune and the Cape Ann were delivered November 30, 2009 and June 1, 2010, respectively. The shareholder loans are subordinated to the long-term bank debt, consisting of the Neptune facility and the Cape Ann facility (described below). Under terms of the shareholder loan agreements, the repayments shall be prioritized over any dividend payment to the owners of our joint ventures. The shareholder loans bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% per year. The Partnership is due 50.0% of the outstanding balance and the other joint venture partners have, on a combined basis, an equal amount of shareholder loans outstanding at the same terms to each of our joint ventures.

 

The shareholder loans financed part of the construction of the vessels and operating expenses until the delivery and commencement of operations of the Neptune and the Cape Ann. In 2011, our joint ventures began repaying principal and a portion of the interest expense based on available cash after servicing of the external debt. The quarterly payments included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and a repayment of principal. Interest was accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment after the full principal is repaid at the end of the loans. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016 and all of the payments for the year ended December 31, 2017 represent payments of interest, including accrued interest to be repaid at the end of the loans.

 

As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Accordingly, the outstanding balance on the shareholder loans was classified as long-term as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Refer to note 18 of our consolidated financial statements under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.” The shareholder loans are subordinated to long-term bank debt and the repayment plan is subject to quarterly discretionary revisions based on available cash after servicing of the long-term bank debt and meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2019, both the 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratios were met by our joint venture owning the Neptune. As a result, our joint venture owning the Neptune qualifies to make payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio was met by the joint venture owning the Cape Ann, however, the projected debt service coverage ratio was not met. As a result, no payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions can be made by joint venture owning the Cape Ann until the debt service coverage ratio is met in future periods.  

 

Neptune Facility

 

In December 2007, our joint venture owning the Neptune, as the borrower, entered into a $300 million secured facility with a syndicate of banks as long-term financing of the construction of the Neptune (the “Neptune facility”). As of December 31, 2019, our 50.0% share of the outstanding balance, excluding deferred debt issuance cost, was $99.1 million. The Neptune facility is secured with a first priority mortgage of the Neptune, an assignment of its rights under the time charter and a pledge of the borrower’s cash accounts. We and the other owners of the borrower have provided a negative pledge of shares in the borrower as security for the facility. In addition, Höegh LNG and MOL guarantee funding of drydocking costs and remarketing efforts in the event of an early termination of the charter.

 

The Neptune facility is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years with a final balloon payment of $165 million, of which $82.5 million is our share, due in April 2022. The Neptune facility bears interest at a rate equal to three months LIBOR plus a margin of 0.5%. The syndicate of banks also provides interest rate swap contracts to the borrower, which are not reflected in the LIBOR rate for the facility.

 

There are no financial covenants in the Neptune facility, but certain other covenants and restrictions apply. The borrower is required to maintain insurance coverage for damage to the FSRU equivalent to 120.0% of the aggregate outstanding loan balance and loss of hire insurance. The borrower must maintain cash accounts with the syndicate of banks for its operating account and restricted cash for debt service for the next 6 months, including interest payments on the facility and associated interest rate swap contracts and certain distribution accounts. Cash in the operating account from hire rates will be applied for the following purposes in the following order; first, to pay operating costs, insurance, taxes and technical management fees; second, to transfer to the debt service retention account on each debt service retention date all or part of the debt service retention amount for such debt service retention date; third, to transfer funds to the restricted cash account for debt service until reserve requirements are met; finally, to transfer funds to certain distribution accounts. Certain conditions apply to making distributions from the distribution accounts, including meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio, no event of default then continuing, and debt service reserve and retention accounts are fully funded. The facility agreement limits the borrower’s ability to raise additional debt, enter into certain material transactions and make guarantees.

 

124

 

 

The Neptune facility identifies various events that may trigger mandatory reduction, prepayment and cancellation of the facility, including total loss or sale of the Neptune. The Neptune facility contains customary events of default such as:

 

·change of ownership;

 

  · inaccuracy of representations and warranties;

 

  · failure to repay principal and interest;

 

  · cross-default to other indebtedness held by the borrower;

 

  · bankruptcy and other insolvency events related to the borrower; and

 

  · termination or breach of the charter.

 

Cape Ann Facility

 

In December 2007, our joint venture owning the Cape Ann, as the borrower, entered into a $300 million secured facility with a syndicate of banks as long-term financing of the construction of the Cape Ann (the “Cape Ann facility”). As of December 31, 2019, our 50.0% share of the outstanding balance, excluding deferred debt issuance cost, was $102.9 million. The Cape Ann facility is secured with a first priority mortgage of the Cape Ann, an assignment of its rights under the time charter and a pledge of the borrower’s cash accounts. We and the other owners of the borrower have provided a negative pledge of shares in the borrower as security for the facility. In addition, Höegh LNG and MOL guarantee funding of drydocking costs and remarketing efforts in the event of an early termination of the charter.

 

The Cape Ann facility is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years with a final balloon payment of $165 million, of which $82.5 million is our share, due in October 2022. The Cape Ann facility bears interest at a rate equal to three months LIBOR plus a margin of 0.5%. The syndicate of banks also provides interest rate swap contracts to the borrower, which are not reflected in the LIBOR rate for the facility.

 

There are no financial covenants in the Cape Ann facility, but certain other covenants and restrictions apply. The borrower is required to maintain insurance coverage for damage to the FSRU equivalent to 120.0% of the aggregate outstanding loan balance and loss of hire insurance. The borrower must maintain cash accounts with the syndicate of banks for its operating account and restricted cash for debt service for the next 6 months, including interest payments on the facility and associated interest rate swap contracts and certain distribution accounts. Cash in the operating account from hire rates will be applied for the following purposes in the following order; first, to pay operating costs, insurance, taxes and technical management fees; second, to transfer to the debt service retention account on each debt service retention date all or part of the debt service retention amount for such debt service retention date; third, to transfer funds to the restricted cash account for debt service until reserve requirements are met; finally, to transfer funds to certain distribution accounts. Certain conditions apply to making distributions from the distribution accounts, including meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio, no event of default then continuing, and debt service reserve and retention accounts are fully funded. The facility agreement limits the borrower’s ability to raise additional debt, enter into certain material transactions and make guarantees. 

 

The Cape Ann facility identifies various events that may trigger mandatory reduction, prepayment and cancellation of the facility, including total loss or sale of the Cape Ann. The Cape Ann facility contains customary events of default such as:

 

  · change of ownership;

 

  · inaccuracy of representations and warranties;

 

  · failure to repay principal and interest;

 

  · cross-default to other indebtedness held by the borrower;

 

  · bankruptcy and other insolvency events related to the borrower; and

 

  · termination or breach of the charter.

 

125

 

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and of the combined financial statements of our joint ventures in accordance with US GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The following is a discussion of the accounting policies applied by us that are considered to involve a higher degree of judgment in their application. Please read note 2 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Time Charter Revenue Recognition

 

Lease revenue recognition:

 

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued revised guidance for leasing, Leases, that amends the accounting guidance on leases for both lessors and lessees. On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new standard using the optional transition method to apply the new standard at the transition date of January 1, 2019 with no retrospective adjustments to prior periods. We are the lessor for time charters for our FSRUs. There were no changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized and, therefore, no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessor accounting.

 

Leases are classified based upon defined criteria either as sale-type/direct financing leases (“financing leases”) or operating leases. A lease that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks of the FSRU to the charterer is accounted for as a financing lease by the lessor. All other leases that do not meet the criteria are classified as operating leases. On January 1, 2019, when adopting the revised leasing guidance, we elected the package of practical expedients and did not reassess conclusions under the previous standard about whether any existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. Accordingly, outstanding leases on January 1, 2019, continue to be classified in accordance with the prior lease guidance.

 

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the charter. The Höegh Gallant’s time charter, which had a five-year lease term at inception, is accounted for as an operating lease. The Höegh Grace's time charter contracts, which have a non-cancellable charter period of ten years, are accounted for as an operating lease. Under one of the time charter contracts, the contract provides for additional variable payments, including a finance component, over the initial term depending upon the actual commencement date of the contract within a defined window of potential commencement dates. The variable payments are considered directly related to the lease performance obligation. The revenue, excluding the financing component, is recognized over the initial 10-year term. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for final income tax directly related to the provision of the lease is recorded as a component of lease revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as financing leases is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. Origination costs related to the time charter are a component of the net investment in financing lease and amortized over the lease term using the effective interest method. Financing leases are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investments in financing leases. The PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, which had a 20-year lease term at inception, meets the criteria of transferring substantially all of the benefits and risks to the charterer and is accounted for as a financing lease.

 

Time charter services revenue recognition:

 

Variable consideration for the time charter services performance obligation, including amounts allocated to time charter services, estimated reimbursements for vessel operating expenses and estimated reimbursements of certain types of costs and taxes, are recognized as revenues as the performance obligation for the 24-hour interval is fulfilled, subject to adjustment for off-hire and performance warranties. Constrained variable consideration is recognized as revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis when the significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received is resolved. Estimates for variable consideration, including constrained variable consideration, are reassessed at the end of each period. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes directly related to the provision of the time charter services are recorded as a component of time charter service revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows. 

 

Joint venture FSRUs lease and time charter services revenue recognition:

 

Our interest in the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income is included in the consolidated financial statements under the equity method of accounting, however, the Joint venture FSRUs’ results are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note and the time charter revenue note (notes 4 and 5, respectively, of our consolidated financial statements). The Neptune's and the Cape Ann’s time charters, which had a twenty-year lease term at inception, are accounted for as operating leases. The joint ventures’ time charters include provisions for the charterer to make upfront payments to compensate for variable cost for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts. The expenditures are considered costs required to fulfill the lease component of the contract. Payments for modifications are deferred and amortized over the shorter of the remaining charter period or the useful life of the additions. Payments for reimbursement of drydocking costs are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the period to the next drydocking.

 

126

 

 

The accounting policy for time charter services for the joint ventures is the same as described above.  

 

Significant judgments in revenue recognition:

 

We do not provide stand-alone bareboat leases or time charter services for FSRUs. As a result, observable stand-alone transaction prices for the performance obligations are not available. The estimation of the transaction price for the lease and the time charter service performance obligation is complex, subject to a number of input factors, such as market conditions when the contract is entered into, internal return objectives and pricing policies, and requires substantial judgment. Significant changes in the transaction price between the two performance obligations could impact conclusions on the accounting for leases as financing or operating leases. In addition, variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount that we expect to be entitled to. Variable consideration is reassessed at the end of the reporting period taking into account performance warranties. The time charter contracts include provisions for performance guarantees that can result in off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other payments for performance warranties. Measurement of some of the performance warranties can be complex and require properly calibrated equipment on the vessel, complex conversions and computations based on sustantial judgment in the interpretation of the contractual provisions. Conclusions on compliance with performance warranties impacts the amount of variable consideration recognized for time charter services.

 

Evaluation of whether a time charter should be accounted for as an operating or financing lease requires use of judgment. In addition to estimating the transaction price for the lease element, our evaluations of each time charter require that we estimate the fair value of our FSRUs, the estimated useful lives of those vessels, whether the option price, if any, represents a bargain purchase option, whether options to extend the time charter are reasonably assured and other factors. The impact of the change in such estimates could impact our evaluation of the accounting for the time charters as financing leases, if the criteria are met, or operating leases.

 

Estimated Useful Lives

 

The estimated economic life of our FSRUs is 40 years. Depreciation of FSRUs is calculated on a straight-line basis using our estimated useful life, less the estimated residual value. Our estimated useful life represents our best estimate of the period we will use the vessel, while the estimated economic life may involve periods an asset will be used by others. Our business model is to provide time charters of five years or more. Charterers tend to prefer newer vessels for long-term charters. Accordingly, we have estimated that the estimated useful life, or depreciable life, to us is 35 years.

 

Valuation of Derivative Instruments

 

Under our risk management policies, we currently use derivative instruments to manage interest rate risk. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities on a prospective basis. For interest rate swaps qualifying as cash flow hedges, the entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income (OCI) with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Those amounts are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item when hedged item affects earnings. In order to designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, formal documentation of the relationship between the derivative and the hedged item is required. This documentation includes the strategy and risk management objective for undertaking the hedge and the method that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges were initially recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Any hedge ineffectiveness was recognized immediately in earnings, as were any gains and losses or amortization on the portion of the derivative instruments that are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings, those amounts were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the gain (loss) on derivative instruments line in the consolidated statement of income.

 

The fair values of the interest rates swaps are estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the relevant LIBOR interest rate curves, adjusted for our credit worthiness and the credit worthiness of the counterparty to the derivative. Determining credit worthiness is highly subjective and requires significant judgment.

 

127

 

 

Goodwill and intangible assets

 

We allocate the cost of acquired companies to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, with the remaining amount being classified as goodwill. Certain intangible assets, such as above-market contracts, are being amortized over the term of the charter. In addition, we entered into an option agreement with Höegh LNG pursuant to which we had the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the existing charter until July 2025. Pursuant to the option agreement, we exercised, on February 27, 2020, our option and we intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant. The intangible for the option for time charter extension will be amortized on a straight line basis starting at the beginning of the Subsequent Charter until July 2025. Our future operating performance will be affected by the amortization of intangible assets and potential impairment charges related to goodwill or intangible assets. Accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets and goodwill may significantly affect our future operating results.

 

The allocation of the purchase price requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets and the appropriate discount rate to value these cash flows. In addition, the process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets is highly subjective and requires significant judgment at many points during the analysis. The estimates and assumptions regarding expected future cash flows and appropriate discount rates are in part based upon existing contracts, anticipated future FSRU charter rates, historical experience, financial forecasts and industry trends and conditions.

 

Loss contingencies

 

Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability and the estimated amount of loss. Such assessments involve complex judgments about future events and estimates and assumptions that are deemed reasonable by management. Accruals are reviewed quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of additional information such as the impact of negotiations, advice of legal counsel or settlements.

 

As discussed in note 18 under "Joint ventures claims and accruals" to our consolidated financial statements, the joint ventures have recorded accruals for the probable liability for boil-off claim related to performance standards as specified in the time charters. Significant judgment is required to assess the interpretation of the contractual provisions related to performance standards, warranties, associated exclusions, the interaction of the contractual provisions, advice of legal counsel, the arbitration determination of key contractual interpretations and the application of the performance data and technical input associated with quantification of potential ranges of outcomes which might occur as a result of future events, such as a final arbitration award or a negotiated settlement, for the claim. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

 

Refer to note 2, under "Recently adopted accounting pronouncements," of our consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

 

  C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.

 

Not applicable.

 

128

 

 

  D. Trend Information

 

Outlook

 

A subsidiary of the Partnership, as the owner of the Höegh Gallant, has a lease and maintenance agreement with EgyptCo, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG, until April 2020. Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025, at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, we exercised our option pursuant to the option agreement and intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by our board of directors and the conflicts committee.

 

For the joint ventures, the charterer of the Cape Ann expects to sub-contract the vessel to operate as an FSRU in India. On March 15, 2020, the Cape Ann arrived in India to commence the subcharter which will continue until the fourth quarter of 2025. Subject to lender approval, an amendment of the time charter party with the joint venture and the charterer is being finalized which will provide for the reimbursement of direct and indirect taxes that the joint venture will incur in India. The tax regulations, guidance and interpretations in India are not clear with respect to certain aspects of taxation of an FSRU operation. As a result, the sub-charter in India provides that it will be cash neutral with respect to the joint venture’s operations. However, the reimbursement of taxes will be based upon tax filings and actual tax payments, while the financial statements will also be impacted by accrued taxes, including the impact of uncertain tax positions, if any. As a result, there may be differences in the timing of recognition of revenue for tax reimbursement and the accrual of income tax and other tax expenses.

 

After the balance sheet date, we have seen significant macroeconomic uncertainty as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. The scale and duration of this development remains uncertain and could materially impact our earnings and cash flow.

 

The statements in this section are forward-looking statements based on management's current expectations and certain material assumptions and, accordingly, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance and outcomes to differ materially from those expressed herein. Please also see “Item 3. Key Information – Risk Factors” and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Historical Financial Performance and Assessing Our Future Prospects.”

 

  E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 2019, there were no off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

  F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

 

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:

  

   Payments Due by Period 
       Less           More 
       than 1   1-3   4-5   than 5 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Total   Year   Years   Years   Years 
Long term debt and revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates  $474,917    44,660    149,154(4)   59,987    221,116 
Interest commitments on long-term debt and interest rate swaps (1)   95,528    22,242    35,837    24,587    12,862 
Operating lease obligations (2)   91    75    16         
Other long-term liabilities (3)   70        70         
Total  $570,606    66,977    185,077    84,574    233,978 

 

(1) Our interest commitments on long-term debt and interest rate swaps are calculated based upon the varying margins by tranche of the Lampung facility and the $385 million facility and the fixed interest rate of the interest rate swaps since we are fully hedged. We swap a floating LIBOR interest rate on our long-term debt for a fixed interest rate on our swaps.
   
(2) Operating lease obligations, please refer to Notes 2 and 11 to our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

 

(3) Our consolidated balance sheet includes other long-term liabilities for an advance provided by the charterer to fund refundable value added tax on the import of the FSRU.

 

(4) The repayment profile for the years 2021 and 2022 includes the maturity of the FSRU tranche of the Lampung facility in 2021 and assumes the exercise of the prepayment right for the export credit tranche of the Lampung facility in the same period.

 

G.Safe Harbor

          

Please read “Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

129

 

 

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

 

Management of Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will irrevocably delegate to our board of directors the authority to oversee and direct our operations, management and policies on an exclusive basis, and such delegation will be binding on any successor general partner of the Partnership. Our general partner, Höegh LNG GP LLC, is wholly owned by Höegh LNG. Our officers will manage our day-to-day activities consistent with the policies and procedures adopted by our board of directors.

 

Employees of affiliates of Höegh LNG provide services to us under the administrative services Agreement. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements.”

 

  A.  Directors and Senior Management

 

The following table provides information about our directors and executive officer. The business address for each of our directors and executive officer is Wessex House, 5th Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM12, Bermuda

 

Name  Age   Position
Sveinung J.S. Støhle  61   Chairman of the Board of Directors
Steven Rees Davies  46   Director
Morten W. Høegh  46   Director
Andrew Jamieson  72   Director, Member of the Audit Committee
Robert Shaw  64   Director, Member of the Audit Committee, Chairman of the Conflicts Committee
David Spivak  52   Director, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Member of the Conflicts Committee
Kathleen McAllister  55   Director, Member of the Audit Committee, Member of the Conflicts Committee
Steffen Føreid  51   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

Sveinung J.S. Støhle has served as our director and chairman of our board of directors since April 2014. Since 2005, Mr. Støhle has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Höegh LNG through his employment with Höegh LNG AS. He is also a member of the board of directors for Avenir LNG Limited. Mr. Støhle has more than 25 years of experience from the LNG industry with both shipping and oil and gas companies. Prior to his employment with Höegh LNG, Mr. Støhle held positions as President of Total LNG USA, Inc., Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Golar LNG Limited, General Manager Commercial of Nigeria LNG Limited and various positions with Elf Aquitaine. Mr. Støhle has a Master of Business Administration from the University of San Francisco and a Bachelor of Science in Finance from California State University.

 

Steven Rees Davies has served as our director since June 2019 and as a director of Höegh LNG since May 2017. He is also a director of Höegh LNG Galleon Limited. Mr. Rees Davies is a partner within the Corporate department of Appleby (Bermuda) Limited, Höegh LNG’s Bermuda counsel, where he practices in the areas of corporate finance, capital markets, regulation, corporate governance and intellectual property. He also advises on cross jurisdictional corporate transactions and restructurings as well as private and public offerings, placements and introductions to the Bermuda, London and New York stock exchanges, in addition to multinational joint ventures and private equity projects. Mr. Rees Davies graduated from Oxford Brookes University with a Bachelor of Laws and from the College of Law, England, with a Postgraduate Diploma in Legal Practice. Mr. Rees Davies qualified as an attorney and member of the bar of New York (US Southern District) in 2002 and as a solicitor in England and Wales in 2003 (non-practicing). He was called to the Bermuda Bar in 2008. Mr. Rees Davies is a British citizen and resides in Bermuda.

 

Morten W. Høegh has served as our director since April 2014. Since 2006, Mr. Høegh has served as the Chairman of Höegh LNG, and he also serves as chairman of Leif Höegh UK. Since 2003, he has been a director of Höegh Autoliners Holdings AS (and its predecessors Leif Höegh & Co. ASA, Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. and Höegh Autoliners Ltd.). Mr. Høegh is a director of Höegh Eiendom Holdings AS, Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. and, until October 2014, was a director of Hector Rail AB. He is a director and Chairman of Gard P&I (Bermuda) Ltd. and Chairman of its Risk and Election and Governance Committees and a director and Chairman of certain of its subsidiaries. He also serves as the Chairman of the Western Europe committee of DNV GL. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Høegh worked as an investment banker with Morgan Stanley. He has a Master in Business Administration from Harvard Business School with High Distinction (Baker Scholar) and a Master of Science in Ocean Systems Management and a Bachelor of Science in Ocean Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

 

130

 

 

Andrew Jamieson has served as our director since April 2014. He has extensive experience in the energy industry, in general, and in LNG, in particular. Since 2009, Mr. Jamieson has served as a director of Höegh LNG. From 1974 to 2009, Mr. Jamieson held various positions with Royal Dutch Shell plc in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Denmark, Australia and Nigeria. Specifically, from 2005 to 2009, he served as Executive Vice President Gas & Projects and Member of the Gas & Power Executive Committee. From 1999 to 2004, he was Managing Director of Nigeria LNG Limited and Vice President of Bonny Gas Transport Limited. While at Royal Dutch Shell plc, Mr. Jamieson also was in charge of the North West Shelf Project in Australia and served as a director on various Royal Dutch Shell plc companies. In 2006, he was made an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) for “services to British business and sustainable development in Nigeria.” Mr. Jamieson serves on the boards of GTT (Gaztransport & Technigaz), Chrysaor Holdings Ltd and Kerogen Capital Hong Kong. Previously, Mr. Jamieson also served on the boards of Woodside Petroleum Ltd., Seven Energy Limited and Velocys PLC. Mr. Jamieson holds a Ph.D. degree from Glasgow University, is the Past President of the Institute of Chemical Engineers and a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering.

 

Robert Shaw has served as our director since April 2014. Since 2008, Mr. Shaw has been an owner and a managing director of Mystras Ventures LLC, which makes dry bulk shipping industry-related investments. He is a managing director of Sea Trade Holdings Inc., that owns and operates dry bulk carriers. He is a director of The Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited, which is a mutual insurance association that insures its members against various risks arising out of the operations of ships. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Shaw held various positions at Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., including board member, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and President. From 1985 to 2000, Mr. Shaw was a partner at Healy & Baillie LLP, a law firm specializing in shipping and international commercial law. Mr. Shaw also was the chairman and is a member of the board of the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs and has served as a board member and the President of the Society of Maritime Arbitrators, Inc. Mr. Shaw was admitted to the Law Society of England and Wales in 1980 and the New York bar in 1981 and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Jurisprudence from St John’s College, Oxford University.

 

David Spivak has served as our director since April 2014. Mr. Spivak is currently the group chief financial officer and senior vice president, corporate development of Persis Holdings Ltd. From May 2016 until May 2018, Mr. Spivak served as the chief financial officer of Seaspan Corporation. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Spivak was the president and founder of Brockstreet Consulting, a strategic business and financial consulting firm. From 1995 to 2012, Mr. Spivak worked at Citigroup as a capital markets professional and investment banker. He held a variety of positions at Citigroup, including serving as a Managing Director in the Investment Banking and Equity Capital Markets Divisions, as well as serving as the Canadian Head of Global Capital Structuring. From 2005 to 2009, Mr. Spivak was head of Citigroup’s shipping equity franchise in New York. Prior to joining Citigroup, Mr. Spivak worked at Coopers & Lybrand in the Financial Advisory Services Group. Mr. Spivak has a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Manitoba. He also is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and past member of the TSX Listings Advisory Committee.

 

Kathleen McAllister has served as our director since July 2017. ​Ms. McAllister served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Transocean Partners LLC from 2014 until its merger with Transocean Ltd. in December 2016 and as Chief Financial Officer from February 2016 until the merger. From 2011 to 2014 Ms. McAllister served as Vice President and Treasurer of Transocean Ltd. and led the initial public offering of Transocean Partners in 2014 after holding several corporate and operations, finance, treasury, accounting and tax roles with Transocean. Ms. McAllister began her career at Deloitte and served in various finance, treasury, accounting and tax roles at Baker Hughes, Helix Energy Solutions Group and Veritas DGC Inc. prior to joining Transocean. Ms. McAllister serves as an independent non-executive director of Black Hills Corporation (since 2019) and Maersk Drilling (since 2019) where she chairs the Audit and Risk Committee and is a member of the University of Houston-Clear Lake Accounting Advisory Board. Ms. McAllister holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting (with Honors) from the University of Houston-Clear Lake and is a NACD Board Leadership Fellow and a Certified Public Accountant.​

 

Steffen Føreid has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer since September 2018 and served as our director from April 2014 until September 2018. From 2010 until September 2018, Mr. Føreid served as the Chief Financial Officer of Höegh LNG. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Føreid was the Chief Financial Officer of and an advisor to Grenland Group ASA. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Føreid held various positions at a corporate restructuring of Kværner ASA, including Executive Vice President during a management buy-out of Kværner ASA and Vice President of Group Business Development at Aker Kværner ASA. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Føreid worked within Corporate and Investment Banking at JPMorgan Chase & Co. Mr. Føreid has a Master of Science in Finance from the University of Fribourg in Switzerland.

 

131

 

 

  B.  Compensation

 

Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner

 

Our general partner does not receive compensation from us for any services it provides on our behalf, although it is entitled to reimbursement for expenses incurred on our behalf. In addition, PT Höegh, the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung, reimburses Höegh Norway pursuant to the technical information and services agreement for expenses Höegh Norway incurs pursuant to a sub-technical support agreement with Höegh LNG Management. Höegh Cyprus, the entity that owns of the Höegh Gallant, reimburses Höegh LNG Management for expenses incurred pursuant to a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management, Höegh Norway for expenses incurred pursuant to the Gallant management agreement and Höegh Maritime Management for expenses incurred pursuant to a secondment agreement for crew with Höegh Maritime Management. Our joint ventures reimburse Höegh LNG Management for expenses incurred pursuant to ship management agreements with Höegh LNG Management. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Support Agreement.”

 

Executive Compensation

 

We did not pay any compensation to our directors or our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer or accrue any obligations with respect to management incentive or retirement benefits for our directors and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer prior to our IPO. Pursuant to the Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement (as defined below) with, Steffen Føreid provides executive officer functions for our benefit. Mr. Føreid is responsible for our day-to-day management subject to the direction of our board of directors. Our officers and employees and officers and employees of our subsidiaries and affiliates of Höegh LNG and our general partner may participate in employee benefit plans and arrangements sponsored by Höegh LNG, our general partner or their affiliates, including plans that may be established in the future. Under the Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement and its predecessor agreements, we paid $2.9 million to Höegh Norway for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Mr. Føreid entered into an employment agreement with Höegh Norway dated June 9, 2010, which was subsequently amended on November 28, 2018 in connection with Mr. Føreid’s appointment as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the employment agreement, Mr. Føreid’s base salary was NOK 3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. In addition, the employment agreement also provides for company car and pension benefits, which were equal to approximately NOK 2.5 million and an accrued bonus to the amount of NOK 2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Compensation of Directors

 

Directors receive compensation for attending meetings of our board of directors, as well as committee meetings. During the year ended December 31, 2019, directors each received a director fee of $81,200 per year (paid half in cash and half in equity-based amounts). Chairpersons of the audit and conflicts committees each received a committee fee of $21,900 per year, and other committee members received a committee fee of $11,000 per year. In addition, each director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of our board of directors or committees. Each director is fully indemnified by us for actions associated with being a director to the extent permitted under Marshall Islands law.

 

2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted the Höegh LNG Partners LP 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the “LTIP,” for our employees, officers, consultants and directors who perform services for us and our subsidiaries. The LTIP provides for the grant of unit options, unit appreciation rights, restricted units, unit awards, phantom units, distribution equivalent rights, cash awards, performance awards, other unit-based awards and substitute awards (collectively, “awards”). These awards are intended to align the interests of employees, officers, consultants and directors with those of our unitholders and to give such individuals the opportunity to share in our long-term performance. Effective June 3, 2016, we granted 21,500 phantom units to Richard Tyrrell under the LTIP. One third of the phantom units vested as of each of November 30, 2017, 2018 and 2019. On September 14, 2018, we granted 14,584 new phantom units to Richard Tyrrell under the LTIP, one third of which vested on November 30, 2019 and one third of which will vest on each of November 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively, so long as Mr. Tyrrell continues to provide services to the Partnership or an affiliate. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we also granted 10,917 phantom units to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Steffen Føreid. One-third of such phantom units vested as of November 30, 2019 and one third of which will vest on each of November 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2019, we awarded a total of 11,180 common units to non-employee directors under the LTIP as compensation for directors’ fees, with an aggregate grant date fair value of $0.2 million, based on our closing unit price on the grant date. On March 26, 2020, we granted 8,100 phantom units to Steffen Føreid, one third of which phantom units will vest on each of November 30, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively.

  

Administration

 

The LTIP is administered by our board of directors, or an alternative committee appointed by our board of directors, which we refer to together as the “committee” for purposes of this summary. The committee administers the LTIP pursuant to its terms and all applicable state, federal or other rules or laws. The committee has the power to determine to whom and when awards will be granted, determine the type and amount of awards (measured in cash or in common units), proscribe and interpret the terms and provisions of each award agreement (the terms of which may vary), accelerate the vesting provisions associated with an award, delegate duties under the LTIP and execute all other responsibilities permitted or required under the LTIP.

 

132

 

 

Securities to Be Offered

 

The maximum aggregate number of common units that may be issued pursuant to any and all awards under the LTIP shall not exceed 658,000 common units, subject to adjustment due to recapitalization or reorganization as provided under the LTIP. In addition, if any common units subject to any award are not issued or transferred, or cease to be issuable or transferable for any reason, including (but not exclusively) because units are withheld or surrendered in payment of taxes or any exercise or purchase price relating to an award or because an award is forfeited, terminated, expires unexercised, is settled in cash in lieu of common units or is otherwise terminated without a delivery of units, those common units will again be available for issue, transfer or exercise pursuant to awards under the LTIP, to the extent allowable by law. Common units to be delivered pursuant to awards under the LTIP may be newly issued common units or common units acquired in the open market, from any person, or any combination of the foregoing.

 

Awards

 

Unit Options. We may grant unit options to eligible persons. Unit options are rights to acquire common units at a specified price. The exercise price of each unit option granted under the LTIP will be stated in the unit option agreement and may vary; provided, however, that, the exercise price for a unit option must not be less than 100% of the fair market value per common unit as of the date of grant of the unit option. Unit options may be exercised in the manner and at such times as the committee determines for each unit option. The committee will determine the methods and form of payment for the exercise price of a unit option and the methods and forms in which common units will be delivered to a participant.

 

Unit Appreciation Rights. A unit appreciation right is the right to receive, in cash or in common units, as determined by the committee, an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of one common unit on the date of exercise over the grant price of the unit appreciation right. The committee may make grants of unit appreciation rights and will determine the time or times at which a unit appreciation right may be exercised in whole or in part. The exercise price of each unit appreciation right granted under the LTIP will be stated in the unit appreciation right agreement and may vary; provided, however, that, the exercise price must not be less than 100% of the fair market value per common unit as of the date of grant of the unit appreciation right.

 

Restricted Units. A restricted unit is a grant of a common unit subject to a risk of forfeiture, performance conditions, restrictions on transferability and any other restrictions imposed by the committee in its discretion. Restrictions may lapse at such times and under such circumstances as determined by the committee. Cash distributions paid with respect to our common units will be paid to the holder of restricted units without restriction at the same time as such distributions are paid to unitholders generally, unless otherwise specified in the applicable award agreement governing the restricted units.

 

Unit Awards. The committee may grant common units that are not subject to restrictions to any eligible person in such amounts as the committee, in its sole discretion, may select.

 

Phantom Units. Phantom units are rights to receive common units, cash or a combination of both at the end of a specified period. The committee may subject phantom units to restrictions (which may include a risk of forfeiture) to be specified in the phantom unit agreement that may lapse at such times and under such circumstances as determined by the committee. Phantom units may be satisfied by delivery of common units, cash equal to the fair market value of the specified number of common units covered by the phantom unit or any combination thereof as determined by the committee. Distribution equivalent rights may be granted in tandem with a phantom unit award, which may provide that cash distribution equivalents will be paid during or after the vesting period with respect to a phantom unit, as determined by the committee.

 

Distribution Equivalent Rights. The committee may grant distribution equivalent rights in tandem with awards under the LTIP (other than unit awards or an award of restricted units), or distribution equivalent rights may be granted alone. Distribution equivalent rights entitle the participant to receive cash equal to the amount of any cash distributions made by us during the period the distribution equivalent right is outstanding. Payment of cash distributions pursuant to a distribution equivalent right issued in connection with another award may be subject to the same vesting terms as the award to which it relates or different vesting terms, in the discretion of the committee.

 

Cash Awards. The committee may grant awards denominated in and settled in cash. Cash awards may be based, in whole or in part, on the value or performance of a common unit.

 

Performance Awards. The committee may condition the right to exercise or receive an award, or the settlement or vesting of an award, or may increase or decrease the amount payable with respect to an award, based on the attainment of one or more performance conditions deemed appropriate by the committee.

 

Other Unit-Based Awards. The committee may grant other unit-based awards under the LTIP, which are awards that may be based, in whole or in part, on the value or performance of a common unit or are denominated or payable in common units. Upon settlement, these other unit-based awards may be paid in common units, cash or a combination thereof, as provided in the award agreement.

 

Substitute Awards. The committee may grant awards in substitution for similar awards held by individuals who become employees, consultants or directors as a result of a merger, consolidation or acquisition by or involving us, an affiliate of another entity or the assets of another entity. Such substitute awards that are unit options or unit appreciation rights may have exercise prices less than 100% of the fair market value per common unit on the date of the substitution if such substitution complies with applicable laws and exchange rules.

 

133

 

  

Tax Withholding

 

At our discretion, and subject to conditions that the committee may impose, tax withholding obligations with respect to an award may be satisfied by withholding from any payment related to an award or by the withholding of common units issuable pursuant to the award based on the fair market value of the common units.

 

Anti-Dilution Adjustments and Change in Control

 

In the event of any “equity restructuring” event (such as a unit dividend, unit split, reverse unit split or similar event) with respect to the common units that may result in an additional compensation expense under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) if adjustments to awards in such event were discretionary, the committee will adjust the number and type of units covered by each outstanding award, the terms and conditions of each such award, the maximum number of units available under the LTIP and the kind of units or other securities available for grant under the LTIP, in each case, to equitably reflect the restructuring event. With respect to any similar event that would not result in a FASB ASC Topic 718 accounting charge if adjustments to awards were discretionary (such as certain recapitalizations, reclassifications, reorganizations, mergers, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization), adjustment will be made by the committee in its discretion in accordance with the terms of the LTIP with respect to, as appropriate, the maximum number of units available under the LTIP, the number of units that may be acquired with respect to an award and, if applicable, the exercise price of an award, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of awards as a result of such events. Upon a “change in control” (as defined in the LTIP), the committee may, in its discretion, (i) remove any forfeiture restrictions applicable to an award, (ii) accelerate the time of exercisability or vesting of an award, (iii) require awards to be surrendered in exchange for a cash payment, (iv) cancel unvested awards without payment or (v) make adjustments to awards as the committee deems appropriate to reflect the change in control.

 

Termination of Employment or Service

 

The consequences on outstanding awards under the LTIP of the termination of a participant’s employment, consulting arrangement or membership on our board of directors will be determined by the committee in the terms of the relevant award agreement.

 

  C.  Board Practices

 

General

 

Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner irrevocably delegates to our board of directors the authority to oversee and direct our operations, management and policies on an exclusive basis, and such delegation is binding on any successor general partner of the Partnership. Our general partner, Höegh LNG GP LLC, is wholly owned by Höegh LNG. Our officers manage our day-to-day activities consistent with the policies and procedures adopted by our board of directors.

 

Our current board of directors consists of seven members, three of whom were appointed by our general partner and four of whom were elected by our common unitholders. Sveinung Støhle, Steven Rees Davies and Kathleen McAllister were appointed by our general partner and will serve for terms as determined by our general partner. The directors elected by our common unitholders, Morten W. Høegh, Andrew Jamieson, David Spivak and Robert Shaw, are divided into four classes serving staggered terms. Mr. Shaw is designated as our Class II elected director and will serve until our annual meeting of unitholders in 2020, Mr. Spivak is designated as our Class III elected director and will serve until our annual meeting of unitholders in 2021, Mr. Høegh is designated as our Class IV elected director and will serve until our annual meeting of unitholders in 2022 and Mr. Jamieson is designated as our Class I elected director and will serve until our annual meeting of unitholders in 2023. At each subsequent annual meeting of unitholders, directors will be elected to succeed the class of director whose term has expired by a plurality of the votes of the common unitholders. Directors elected by our common unitholders may be nominated by our board of directors or by any limited partner or group of limited partners that holds at least 10% of the outstanding common units.

 

Each outstanding common unit is entitled to one vote on matters subject to a vote of common unitholders. However, to preserve our ability to claim an exemption from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the Code, if at any time, any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any such units owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors). The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other common unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of such class of units. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors.

 

The Series A preferred units generally have no voting rights except (i) with respect to amendments to the partnership agreement that would have a material adverse effect on the existing terms of the Series A preferred units, (ii) or in the event the Partnership proposes to issue Parity Securities, if the cumulative dividends payable on outstanding Series A preferred units are in arrears, or Senior Securities. However, if and whenever distributions payable on the Series A preferred units are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Series A preferred units (voting together as a class with all other classes of Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to replace one of the members of our board of directors appointed by our general partner with a person nominated by such holders (unless the holders of Series A preferred units, voting together as a class with all other classes of Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, voting as a class, have previously elected a member of our board of directors, and such director continues then to serve on the board of directors).

 

134

 

 

Committees

 

We have an audit committee that, among other things, reviews our external financial reporting, engages our external auditors and oversees our internal audit activities and procedures, if any, and the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our audit committee is comprised of four directors, Ms. McAllister, Mr. Jamieson, Mr. Shaw and Mr. Spivak. Each of Ms. McAllister, Mr. Jamieson, Mr. Shaw and Mr. Spivak satisfies the independence standards required for audit committee members of the SEC and the NYSE. Ms. McAllister and Mr. Spivak qualify as “audit committee financial experts” for purposes of SEC rules and regulations.

 

We also have a conflicts committee comprised of three members of our board of directors. The conflicts committee will be available at our board of directors’ discretion to review specific matters that our board of directors believes may involve conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee will determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of us or directors, officers or employees of our general partner or its affiliates, and must meet the independence standards established by the NYSE to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors and certain other requirements. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners and not a breach by our directors, our general partner or its affiliates of any duties any of them may owe us or our unitholders. Our conflicts committee is comprised of Ms. McAllister, Mr. Shaw and Mr. Spivak.

 

Exemptions from Corporate Governance Rules

 

Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under SEC rules, we are permitted to follow the corporate governance practices of the Marshall Islands (the jurisdiction in which we are organized) in lieu of certain of the corporate governance requirements that would otherwise be applicable to us. The NYSE rules do not require a listed company that is a foreign private issuer to have a board of directors that is comprised of a majority of independent directors. Under Marshall Islands law, we are not required to have a board of directors comprised of a majority of directors meeting the independence standards described in the NYSE rules. In addition, the NYSE rules do not require limited partnerships like us to have boards of directors comprised of a majority of independent directors. 

 

NYSE rules do not require foreign private issuers or limited partnerships like us to establish a compensation committee or a nominating/corporate governance committee. Similarly, under Marshall Islands law, we are not required to have a compensation committee or a nominating/corporate governance committee. Accordingly, we do not have a compensation committee or a nominating/corporate governance committee. For a listing and further discussion of how our corporate governance practices differ from those required of U.S. companies listed on the NYSE, please read “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.”

 

  D.  Employees

 

Employees of Höegh LNG’s affiliates provide administrative services to us pursuant to the administrative services agreement. Our board of directors has the authority to hire other employees as deemed necessary. Certain affiliates of Höegh LNG also provide commercial and technical management services to our fleet pursuant to ship management agreements, the Gallant management agreement, a sub-technical support agreement, commercial and administration management agreements and other service agreements. Crew are employed directly by our or by Höegh LNG’s subsidiaries to operate our FSRUs.

 

E.  Unit Ownership

 

Please read “Item 7.A. Major Unitholders.”

 

135

 

 

Item 7.  Major Unitholders and Related Party Transactions

 

  A.  Major Unitholders

 

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common units as of March 31, 2020, by each of our directors and executive officers and each person that we know to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common units:

 

Major Unitholders

 

   Common Units 
   Beneficially Owned 
Name of Beneficial Owner  Number   Percent 
Höegh LNG Holding Ltd.(1)   15,257,498    45.8%
FMR LLC(2)   1,970,147    5.9%
Sveinung J. S. Støhle (Chairman of the Board of Directors)   *    * 
Steven Mathew Rees Davies (Director)   *    * 
Kathleen McAllister (Director)   *    * 
Morten W. Høegh (Director)(3)   441,037    1.3%
Andrew Jamieson (Director)   *    * 
Robert Shaw (Director)   *    * 
David Spivak (Director)   *    * 
Steffen Føreid (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)   *    * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)   540,415    1.6%

 

* Less than 1%

 

(1) Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. is a public company listed on the Oslo Børs stock exchange. Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. is the largest shareholder of Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., holding an 8.88% ownership interest. Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. is indirectly controlled by Leif O. Høegh and a family trust under which Morten W. Høegh, one of our directors, is the primary beneficiary.
(2) FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson (collectively, “FMR LLC”) each have sole dispositive power as to 1,970,147 common units. This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed by FMR LLC on February 7, 2020.
(3) Morten W. Høegh may be deemed to have shared beneficial ownership of 441,037 common units through direct and indirect ownership interests in Leif Höegh & Co Ltd. and Brompton Cross VII Limited. Morten W. Høegh has an indirect minority ownership and voting interest in Fraternitas AS, which beneficially owns 50,000 common units. If the common units owned by Fraternitas AS were deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Høegh, then he would share beneficial ownership of a total of 491,037 common units, or 1.5% of the common units issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019.

 

Each outstanding common unit is entitled to one vote on matters subject to a vote of common unitholders. However, to preserve our ability to claim an exemption from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the Code, if at any time any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any units beneficially owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes under our partnership agreement, unless otherwise required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other common unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors.

 

Höegh LNG exercises influence over the Partnership through our general partner, a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG, which in its sole discretion appoints three directors to our board of directors. Please read “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Management of Höegh LNG Partners LP.”

 

136

 

 

  B. Related Party Transactions

 

As a result of our relationships with Höegh LNG and its affiliates, we and our subsidiaries have entered into various agreements that were not the result of arm’s length negotiations. A number of agreements were entered into in connection with our IPO. In addition, we may enter into new agreements in the future. We have established a conflicts committee that may review future related party transactions. Please refer to “Item 6.C. Board Practices—Committees.” The related party agreements that we have entered into or were party to since January 1, 2017 are discussed below.

 

Our partnership agreement sets forth procedures by which future related party transactions may be approved or resolved by our board of directors. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our board of directors may, but is not required to, seek the approval of a related party transaction from the conflicts committee of our board of directors or from the common unitholders. Affiliated transactions that are not approved by the conflicts committee of our board of directors and that do not involve a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less favorable to us than those generally provided to or available from unrelated third parties or be “fair and reasonable” to us. In determining whether a transaction or resolution is “fair and reasonable,” our board of directors may consider the totality of the relationships between the parties involved, including other transactions that may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us. If the above procedures are followed, it will be presumed that, in making its decision, our board of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good faith, it requires that person to believe that he is acting in the best interests of the Partnership, unless the context otherwise requires.

 

Our conflicts committee is comprised of at least two members of our board of directors. The conflicts committee is available at our board of directors’ discretion to review specific matters that our board of directors believes may involve conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee may determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts committee may not be officers or employees of us or directors, officers or employees of our general partner or its affiliates, and must meet the independence standards established by the NYSE to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors and certain other requirements.

 

Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement

 

On August 8, 2014, in connection with the closing of our IPO, we entered into a contribution, purchase and sale agreement with Höegh LNG that effected the transfer of the ownership interests in the entities that owned the vessels in our initial fleet and related shareholder loans, promissory notes and accrued interest and the use of the net proceeds of our IPO.

 

Omnibus Agreement

 

Upon completion of the IPO, we entered into an omnibus agreement with Höegh LNG, our general partner and certain of our other subsidiaries. The following discussion describes certain provisions of the omnibus agreement.

 

Noncompetition

 

Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agrees, and causes its controlled affiliates (other than us, our general partner and our subsidiaries) to agree, not to acquire, own, operate or charter any FSRU or LNG carrier operating under a charter for five or more years. For purposes of this section, we refer to these vessels, together with any related charters and ancillary installations or equipment covered by such charters, as “Five-Year Vessels” and to all other FSRUs and LNG carriers as “Non-Five-Year Vessels.” The restrictions in this paragraph will not prevent Höegh LNG or any of its controlled affiliates (other than us and our subsidiaries) from:

 

  (1) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering any Non-Five-Year Vessel;

 

  (2) acquiring one or more Five-Year Vessels if Höegh LNG promptly offers to sell the vessel to us for the acquisition price plus any administrative costs (including re-flagging and reasonable legal costs) associated with the transfer to us at the time of the acquisition;

 

  (3) delivering a Non-Five-Year Vessel under charter for five or more years if Höegh LNG offers to sell the vessel to us for fair market value (x) promptly after the time she becomes a Five-Year Vessel and (y) at each renewal or extension of that charter for five or more years;

 

  (4) acquiring one or more Five-Year Vessels as part of the acquisition of a controlling interest in a business or package of assets and owning, operating or chartering those vessels; provided, however, that:

 

  (a) if less than a majority of the value of the business or assets acquired is attributable to Five-Year Vessels, as determined in good faith by Höegh LNG’s board of directors, Höegh LNG must offer to sell such Five-Year Vessels to us for their fair market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs Höegh LNG incurs in connection with the acquisition and the transfer of such vessels to us separate from the acquired business; and

 

137

 

 

  (b) if a majority or more of the value of the business or assets acquired is attributable to Five-Year Vessels, as determined in good faith by Höegh LNG’s board of directors, Höegh LNG must notify us of the proposed acquisition in advance. Not later than 10 days following receipt of such notice, we will notify Höegh LNG if we wish to acquire any of such vessels in cooperation and simultaneously with Höegh LNG acquiring the Non-Five-Year Vessels. If we do not notify Höegh LNG of our intent to pursue the acquisition within 10 days, Höegh LNG may proceed with the acquisition and then offer to sell such vessels to us as provided in clause (a) above;

 

  (5) acquiring a non-controlling interest in any company, business or pool of assets;

 

  (6) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering any Five-Year Vessel if we do not fulfill our obligation to purchase such vessel in accordance with the terms of any existing or future agreement;

 

  (7) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering a Five-Year Vessel subject to the offers to us described in clauses (2), (3) and (4) above pending our determination whether to accept such offers and pending the closing of any offers we accept;

 

  (8) providing ship management services relating to any vessel;

 

  (9) owning or operating any Five-Year Vessel that Höegh LNG owned on the closing date of our IPO and that was not part of our initial fleet; or

 

  (10) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering a Five-Year Vessel if we have previously advised Höegh LNG that we consent to such acquisition, ownership, operation or charter.

 

If Höegh LNG or any of its controlled affiliates (other than us or our subsidiaries) acquires, owns, operates or charters Five-Year Vessels pursuant to any of the exceptions described above, it may not subsequently expand that portion of its business other than pursuant to those exceptions. However, such Five-Year Vessels could eventually compete with our vessels upon their re-chartering.

 

In addition, under the omnibus agreement we agree, and cause our subsidiaries to agree, to acquire, own, operate or charter Five-Year Vessels only. The restrictions in this paragraph will not prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from:

 

  (1) owning, operating or chartering any Non-Five-Year Vessel that was previously a Five-Year Vessel while owned by us;

 

  (2) acquiring Non-Five-Year Vessels as part of the acquisition of a controlling interest in a business or package of assets and owning, operating or chartering those vessels; provided, however, that:

 

  (a) if less than a majority of the value of the business or assets acquired is attributable to Non-Five-Year Vessels, as determined in good faith by us, we must offer to sell such vessels to Höegh LNG for their fair market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs that we incur in connection with the acquisition and the transfer of such vessels to Höegh LNG separate from the acquired business; and

 

  (b) if a majority or more of the value of the business or assets acquired is attributable to Non-Five-Year Vessels, as determined in good faith by us, we must notify Höegh LNG of the proposed acquisition in advance. Not later than 10 days following receipt of such notice, Höegh LNG must notify us if it wishes to acquire the Non-Five-Year Vessels in cooperation and simultaneously with us acquiring the Five-Year Vessels. If Höegh LNG does not notify us of its intent to pursue the acquisition within 10 days, we may proceed with the acquisition and then offer to sell such vessels to Höegh LNG as provided in clause (a) above;

 

  (3) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering any Non-Five-Year Vessels subject to the offer to Höegh LNG described in clause (2) above, pending its determination whether to accept such offer and pending the closing of any offer it accepts; or

 

  (4) acquiring, owning, operating or chartering Non-Five-Year Vessels if Höegh LNG has previously advised us that it consents to such acquisition, ownership, operation or charter.

 

If we or any of our subsidiaries acquires, owns, operates or charters Non-Five-Year Vessels pursuant to any of the exceptions described above, neither we nor such subsidiary may subsequently expand that portion of our business other than pursuant to those exceptions.

 

138

 

 

Upon a change of control of us or our general partner, the noncompetition provisions of the omnibus agreement will terminate immediately. Upon a change of control of Höegh LNG, the noncompetition provisions of the omnibus agreement applicable to Höegh LNG will terminate at the date of the change of control. On the date on which a majority of our directors ceases to consist of directors that were (i) appointed by our general partner prior to our first annual meeting of unitholders and (ii) recommended for election by a majority of our appointed directors, the noncompetition provisions applicable to Höegh LNG shall terminate immediately.

 

In the event that Höegh LNG is required to make an offer to sell to us a Five-Year Vessel, or we are required to make an offer to sell to Höegh LNG a Non-Five-Year Vessel, and we and Höegh LNG are unable to agree upon the fair market value of such vessel, the fair market value will be determined by a mutually acceptable investment banking firm, ship broker or other expert advisor, and we or Höegh LNG, as the case may be, will have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the vessel at such price.

 

Rights of First Offer on FSRUs and LNG Carriers

 

Under the omnibus agreement, we and our subsidiaries grant to Höegh LNG a right of first offer on any proposed sale, transfer or other disposition of any Five-Year Vessels or Non-Five-Year Vessels owned by us. Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agrees (and will cause its subsidiaries to agree) to grant a similar right of first offer to us for any Five-Year Vessels they might own. These rights of first offer will not apply to a (i) sale, transfer or other disposition of vessels between any affiliated subsidiaries or pursuant to the terms of any current or future charter or other agreement with a charter party or (ii) merger with or into, or sale of substantially all of the assets to, an unaffiliated third party.

 

Prior to engaging in any negotiation regarding any vessel disposition with respect to a Five-Year Vessel with an unaffiliated third party or any Non-Five-Year Vessel, we or Höegh LNG, as the case may be, will deliver a written notice to the other relevant party setting forth the material terms and conditions of the proposed transaction. During the 30-day period after the delivery of such notice, we and Höegh LNG, as the case may be, will negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement on the transaction. If we do not reach an agreement within such 30-day period, we or Höegh LNG, as the case may be, will be able within the next 180 calendar days to sell, transfer, dispose or re-charter the vessel to a third party (or to agree in writing to undertake such transaction with a third party) on terms generally no less favorable to us or Höegh LNG, as the case may be, than those offered pursuant to the written notice.

  

Upon a change of control of us or our general partner, the right of first offer provisions of the omnibus agreement will terminate immediately. Upon a change of control of Höegh LNG, the right of first offer provisions applicable to Höegh LNG under the omnibus agreement will terminate at the date of the change of control. On the date on which a majority of our directors ceases to consist of directors that were (i) appointed by our general partner prior to our first annual meeting of unitholders and (ii) recommended for election by a majority of our appointed directors, the provisions related to the rights of first offer granted to us by Höegh LNG shall terminate immediately.

 

Indemnification

 

Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agreed to indemnify us until August 12, 2019 against certain environmental and toxic tort liabilities with respect to the assets contributed or sold to us to the extent arising prior to the time they were contributed or sold to us. No indemnification claims were filed for environmental liabilities under the agreement prior to its expiration.

 

Höegh LNG also indemnifies us for losses:

 

  · related to certain defects in title to the assets contributed or sold to us and any failure to obtain, prior to the time they were contributed to us, certain consents and permits necessary to conduct our business, which liabilities arise within three years after August 12, 2014;

 

  · related to certain tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the assets contributed or sold to us prior to the time they were contributed or sold;

 

  · in the event that we do not receive hire rate payments under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on the closing date of our IPO through the earlier of (i) the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung or (ii) the termination of such time charter;

 

139

 

 

  · with respect to any obligation to pay liquidated damages to PGN LNG under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for failure to deliver the PGN FSRU Lampung by the scheduled delivery date set forth in the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter;

 

  · with respect to any non-budgeted expenses (including repair costs) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project (including the construction of the related tower yoke mooring system) occurring prior to the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung pursuant to the time charter; and

 

  · pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 12, 2015, Höegh LNG confirmed that the indemnification provisions of the omnibus agreement include indemnification for all non-budgeted, non-creditable Indonesian value added taxes and non-budgeted Indonesian withholding taxes, including any related impact on cash flow from PT Höegh and interest and penalties associated with any non-timely Indonesian tax filings related to the ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring whether incurred (i) prior to the closing date of the IPO, (ii) after the closing date of the IPO to the extent such taxes, interest, penalties or related impact on cash flows relate to periods of ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring and are not subject to prior indemnification payments or deemed reimbursable by the charterer under its audit of the taxes related to the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for periods up to and including June 30, 2015, or (iii) after June 30, 2015 to the extent withholding taxes exceed the minimum amount of withholding tax due under Indonesian tax regulations due to lack of documentation or untimely withholding tax filings.

 

Amendments

 

The omnibus agreement may not be amended without the prior approval of the conflicts committee of our board of directors if the proposed amendment will, in the reasonable discretion of our board of directors, adversely affect holders of our common units.

 

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our general partner, our board of directors and our conflicts committee are entitled to make decisions in “good faith” if they believe that the decision is in our best interests. Our partnership agreement permits our general partner, our board of directors and our conflicts committee to consult with advisors and consultants, such as, among others, appraisers and investment bankers, selected by either of them to assist them with, among other things, the determination of the fair market value of a vessel. Any act taken or omitted to be taken in reliance upon the advice or opinion such advisors as to matters that our general partner, our board of directors and our conflicts committee reasonably believes to be within such advisor’s professional or expert competence shall be conclusively presumed to have been done or omitted in good faith and in accordance with such advice.

 

Indemnification Agreement

 

On September 27, 2017, we entered into an indemnification agreement with Höegh LNG with respect to the boil-off claims under the Neptune and Cape Ann time charters, pursuant to which Höegh LNG will, among other things, indemnify us for our share of any losses and expenses related to or arising from the failure of either Neptune or Cape Ann to meet the performance standards related to the daily boil-off of LNG under their respective time charters (including any cash impact that may result from any settlement with respect to such claims, including any reduction in the hire rate under either time charter). Please read note 18 “Commitments and Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Administrative Services Agreements

 

Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement

 

In December 2019, the Partnership and the operating company entered an administrative services agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides certain administrative services to us (the “administrative services agreement”). The administrative services agreement replaced the Prior Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreement and the Prior Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement, each as defined below. We reimbursed Höegh Norway approximately $2.9 million under the administrative services agreement for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

Each month, we and our operating company reimburse Höegh Norway for its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of the services under the administrative services agreement. Höegh Norway receives a service fee in U.S. Dollars equal to 3.0% of the costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with providing services. The services provided under the administrative services agreement will be provided in a diligent manner, as we or our operating company may reasonably direct.

 

The administrative services agreement may be terminated by us and our operating company upon 90 days’ written notice for any reason in the sole discretion of our and our operating company’s boards of directors. The administrative services agreement may be terminated by Höegh Norway at any time on or after December 31, 2024 upon 90 days’ written notice for any reason in the sole discretion of Höegh Norway. The administrative services agreement may also be terminated solely by Höegh Norway upon 90 days’ written notice if:

 

140

 

 

·there is a change of control of us or our general partner;

 

·a receiver is appointed for all or substantially all of our property or our operating company’s property;

 

·an order is made to wind up the Partnership or our operating company;

 

·a final judgment, order or decree that materially and adversely affects our or our operating company’s ability to perform the agreement is obtained or entered and not vacated, discharged or stayed; or

 

·we make a general assignment for the benefit of our creditors, file a petition in bankruptcy or for liquidation or commence any reorganization proceedings.

 

The administrative services provided by Höegh Norway to the Partnership and our operating company include:

 

  · bookkeeping, audit and accounting services: assisting with the maintenance of our corporate books and records, assisting with the preparation of our tax returns and arranging for the provision of audit and accounting services;

 

  · legal and insurance services: arranging for the provision of legal, insurance and other professional services and maintaining our existence and good standing in necessary jurisdictions;

 

  · administrative and clerical services: assisting with office space and arranging the provision of IT services;

 

  · advisory services: assisting in complying with U.S. and other applicable securities laws;

 

  · assisting with the integration of any acquired businesses.

 

Under the administrative services agreement, Steffen Føreid, as an officer of Höegh Norway, provides executive officer functions for our benefit.

 

Under the administrative services agreement, we and the operating company will indemnify Höegh Norway and its subcontractors against all actions that may be brought against them as a result of their performance of the administrative services including, without limitation, all actions brought under the environmental laws of any jurisdiction, and against and in respect of all costs and expenses they may suffer or incur due to defending or settling such actions; provided, however, that such indemnity excludes any or all losses to the extent that they are caused by or due to the fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct of Höegh Norway or such subcontractor or its officers, employees and agents.

 

Prior Administrative Services Agreements

 

In connection with the IPO, we and our operating company entered into an administrative services agreement with Höegh UK (the “Prior Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreement”), pursuant to which Höegh UK provided us and our operating company certain administrative services. The agreement had an initial term of five years and expired during 2019. Höegh UK received a service fee in U.S. Dollars equal to 5.0% of the costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with providing services. We reimbursed Höegh UK approximately $2.9 million, $2.7 million and $2.7 million in total under the Prior Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Under the Prior Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreement, Höegh UK was permitted to subcontract to Höegh Norway certain of the administrative services provided to us pursuant to an administrative services agreement with Höegh Norway (the “Prior Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement”). This agreement had an initial term of five years and expired during 2019.

Höegh Norway received a service fee in U.S. Dollars equal to 3.0% of the costs and expenses incurred by it in connection with providing services. Höegh UK reimbursed Höegh Norway approximately $2.9 million, $2.1 million and $1.7 million in total under the Prior Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Our operating company and Höegh UK entered into administrative services agreements with Leif Höegh UK (the “Prior Leif Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreements”), pursuant to which Leif Höegh UK provided certain administrative services. Each of the Prior Leif Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreements were terminated by mutual agreement during 2019.

 

Our operating company and Höegh UK reimbursed Leif Höegh UK for its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Prior Leif Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreements. In addition, Leif Höegh UK received a services fee equal to 5% of the costs and expenses of secretarial services under the agreement with Höegh UK. For the year ended December 31, 2019 there were no expenses incurred under the Prior Leif Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreements. Höegh UK reimbursed Leif Höegh UK approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million in total under the Prior Leif Höegh UK Administrative Services Agreements for each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

141

 

 

Commercial and Administration Management Agreements

 

Each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. has entered into a commercial and administration management agreement with Höegh Norway. Pursuant to each agreement, Höegh Norway provides the following services to SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., as applicable:

 

  · accounting, including budgeting, reporting and annual audited reports;

 

  · finance and cash management;

 

  · in-house legal;

 

  · commercial;

 

  · insurance; and

 

  · general office administration and secretary functions.

 

Each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. pays Höegh Norway an annual management fee equal to costs incurred plus 3%. Höegh Norway was paid management fees of approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million under the commercial and administration management agreements with each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018 management fees of approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million were paid under the commercial and administration management agreements by each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2017, management fees of approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million were paid under the commercial and administration management agreements by each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., respectively.

 

Each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. also will indemnify Höegh Norway and its employees and agents against claims brought against them under the applicable commercial and administration management agreement. The agreements may be terminated by either party upon 90 days’ written notice.

 

Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Support Agreement

 

In order to assist with the technical and maritime management of the vessels, each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd., SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., Höegh Cyprus and Höegh Colombia has entered into a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management, and Höegh Norway has entered into a sub-technical support agreement with Höegh LNG Management for the technical management of the PGN FSRU Lampung. Each of the ship management agreements and the sub-technical support agreement provides that Höegh LNG Management must use its best endeavors to provide technical services, including but not limited to the following:

 

  · crew management: except with respect to the ship management agreements with Höegh Cyprus and Höegh Colombia, providing suitably qualified crew for each vessel, arranging for all transportation of the crew, ensuring the crew meets all medical requirements of the flag state, training the crew and conducting union negotiations;

 

  · technical management: supervise the maintenance and efficiency of the vessel, arranging and supervising drydockings, repairs, alterations and maintenance of the vessel and arranging and supplying the necessary stores, spares and lubricating oils;

 

  · provisions: arranging for the supply of provisions; and

 

  · accounting: establishing an accounting system that keeps true and correct accounts with respect to ship management services and maintains the records of all costs and expenditures incurred.

 

142

 

 

Each of the ship management agreements may be terminated by Höegh LNG Management if the vessel owner fails to pay any amount due under the agreement or employs the vessel in a hazardous or illegal manner. Each of these agreements also may be terminated by the vessel owner if Höegh LNG Management is in material breach of its obligations. If the vessel is sold, becomes a total loss or is requisitioned, or if an order or resolution is passed for the winding up, dissolution, liquidation or bankruptcy of either party or if a receiver is appointed for either party, the agreement terminates. With respect to the ship management agreements or sub-technical support agreement with each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd., SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., Höegh Norway and Höegh Cyprus, either party may terminate the ship management agreements and the sub-technical support agreement upon 30 days’ notice (with respect to the ship management agreement with Höegh Cyprus) or 90 days’ notice (with respect to the other agreements).

 

For the respective years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, annual management fees of approximately $3.6 million, $3.6 million and $3.7 million in the aggregate were paid under the ship management agreements or sub-technical support agreement. In addition, the vessel owner must indemnify Höegh LNG Management and its employees, agents and subcontractors against all actions, proceedings, claims, demands or liabilities arising in connection with the performance of the ship management agreements or the sub-technical support agreement, unless the same resulted solely from the negligence, gross negligence or willful default of Höegh LNG Management or its employees, agents and subcontractors, in which case Höegh LNG Management will be liable in an amount up to 10 times the annual management fee. 

 

Gallant Management Agreement

 

Höegh Cyprus is party to a management agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides administrative, commercial and technical management services, each as instructed from time to time by Höegh Cyprus. The services performed under the Gallant management agreement may include, but are not limited to:

 

·administrative management services, including:

 

oprovision of a person to be appointed as president or managing director of Höegh Cyprus;
oservices relating to the day-to-day running of the business of Höegh Cyprus;
omanagement and provision of controller functions for financial matters;
oarranging entry into loan agreements, currency exchange agreements, interest hedging agreements, financial swap agreements, and other agreements in respect of futures and derivative instruments, each subject to the authorization of Höegh Cyprus’s board of directors;
oprovision of budgets and financial statements, including long- and short-term budgets, long term financial forecasts, status reports and projections, annual reports and quarterly reports;
ohandling and settling minor claims by third parties; and
obringing or defending actions, suits and proceedings;

 

·commercial management services, including;

 

  o chartering services, including seeking and negotiating employment for the Höegh Gallant, appointment of brokers and agents, and concluding charter contracts, subject to the authorization of Höegh Cyprus’ board of directors;
  o arranging the provision of bunker fuel for the Höegh Gallant;
  o operation of the Höegh Gallant, including the provision of compatibility/interface studies, FSRU approval and vetting processes and voyage estimates and accounts and calculation of hire, freights, demurrage and dispatch moneys due from or due to the charterer, and the issuance of voyage instructions, appointing agents and stevedores and to arrange survey of cargoes; and
  o freight management, including provision of freight estimates and accounts and calculation of hire and freights and/or demurrage and dispatch money due from or due to charterers and arranging proper payment of all hire and freight revenues; and

 

·technical management services, including arranging insurance and handling and settling all insurance, salvage and other claims.

 

143

 

 

The Gallant management agreement’s term is concurrent with the term of the Höegh Gallant time charter, and continues thereafter until either party terminates the agreement upon six months’ notice. Additionally, Höegh Norway may terminate or suspend performance under the agreement if Höegh Cyprus fails to pay any amount due under the agreement. If an order or resolution is passed for the winding up, dissolution, liquidation or bankruptcy of either party or if a receiver is appointed for either party, the agreement terminates.

 

Höegh Cyprus pays Höegh Norway an annual management fee in NOK of Höegh Norway’s documented costs plus 3%. An estimate of the annual management fee forms the basis of an amount payable by equal monthly installments in arrears. Settlement of the discrepancy between the estimated management fee and the actual management fee takes place at the end of each calendar year. Höegh Cyprus paid Höegh Norway approximately $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million under the Gallant management agreement for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

Höegh Cyprus must indemnify Höegh Norway and its employees, agents and subcontractors against all actions, proceedings, claims, demands or liabilities arising in connection with the performance of the Gallant management agreement, unless the same resulted solely from the negligence, gross negligence or willful default of Höegh Norway or its employees, agents and subcontractors. If a claim is the sole result of the negligence, gross negligence or willful default of Höegh Norway or its employees, agents and subcontractors, then Höegh Norway is liable in an amount up to NOK 500,000 per incident.

 

Technical Information and Services Agreement

 

PT Höegh entered into a technical information and services agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides PT Höegh certain technical information and services. The technical information and services agreement’s term is concurrent with the term of the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, including any exercised extension options.

 

The technical information and services agreement may be terminated with immediate effect prior to the end of its term if either PT Höegh or Höegh Norway (i) fails to pay any amount due under the technical information and services agreement and such failure continues for more than 14 days after notice of such failure was given to the failing party, (ii) commits a material breach of the technical information and services agreement that remains unremedied for more than 30 days after the breaching party was notified of such material breach or (iii) suffers an insolvency event. The technical information and services agreement may also be terminated by PT Höegh or Höegh Norway upon 30 days’ written notice.

 

Pursuant to the technical information and services agreement, Höegh Norway provides technical information, consisting of data, commercial information and technical information, to PT Höegh relating to the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring. During the period of the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, including any exercised extension options, Höegh Norway also provides PT Höegh non-transferrable and non-exclusive intellectual property rights in respect of the technical information, along with the safety management system and certain databases, technology and software.

 

The services provided by Höegh Norway to PT Höegh include:

 

·commercial support, including:

 

oassisting in identifying suppliers, liaising with off-shore suppliers of goods and services, assisting in identifying insurance providers;

 

oassisting in identifying insurance providers; and

 

oassisting in negotiations and reviewing contracts and insurance policies;

 

·technical support and advice, including in relation to:

 

oidentification, assessment and resolution of technical issues;

 

oinformation technology;

 

ohealth, safety and the environment; and

 

omaintaining, developing and improving a quality assurance system to ensure compliance with relevant mandatory international rules, regulations and standards;

 

144

 

 

·financial and cash management support, including budgeting, reporting and preparation of annual audited reports;

 

·in-house legal support;

 

·general administrative and back-office support;

 

·research and development; and

 

·training for employees.

 

Each month, PT Höegh pays Höegh Norway a fee for the provision of the technical information, including the intellectual property rights, and the services. The monthly fee consists of (i) a license fee and (ii) a service fee consisting of a pro rata payment of the estimated annual costs incurred by Höegh Norway under the technical information and services agreement and a 5.0% fee on such payment. The service fee is reconciled annually with the actual costs incurred by Höegh Norway during the prior calendar year. Any amounts payable after such reconciliation must be paid by the owing party no later than 44 days after the end of each such calendar year. Höegh Norway has never invoiced any amounts for the license fee. PT Höegh paid Höegh Norway approximately $0.04 million, $0.03 million and $0.04 million for the service fee under the technical information and services agreement for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. 

 

Under the technical information and services agreement, PT Höegh indemnifies Höegh Norway against all losses arising under the technical information and services agreement in connection with (i) losses suffered by third parties, (ii) the personal injury, sickness or death of any person that itself or together with its affiliates holds more than half of PT Höegh’s issued share capital or any of PT Höegh’s officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, advisors and contractors and (iii) loss of or damage to property owned or under the custody of PT Höegh or any party listed above in section (ii) of this paragraph.

 

Master Spare Parts Supply Agreement

 

PT Höegh and Höegh Asia entered into a master spare parts supply agreement, pursuant to which Höegh Asia supplies certain spare parts and supplies for the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring to PT Höegh. PT Höegh, from time to time, submits an order, which may be freely accepted or declined, to Höegh Asia for the supply of spare parts, lubricating oils and other provisions. In respect of each accepted order, Höegh Asia submits an invoice to PT Höegh consisting of the actual cost of the supplied services and a 5.0% fee on the cost of such supplied services, which must be paid by PT Höegh no more than 14 days after receipt of such invoice.

 

Master Maintenance Agreement

 

PT Höegh and Höegh Shipping entered into a master maintenance agreement, pursuant to which Höegh Shipping provides certain maintenance services to PT Höegh. PT Höegh, from time to time, submits an order, which may be freely accepted or declined, to Höegh Shipping for the supply of services, including maintenance of the PGN FSRU Lampung, its systems and equipment and the Mooring. In respect of each accepted order, Höegh Shipping submits an invoice to PT Höegh consisting of the actual cost of the supplied services and a 5.0% fee on the cost of such supplied services, which must be paid by PT Höegh no more than 14 days after receipt of such invoice.

 

Secondment Agreement

 

Höegh Cyprus has entered into a secondment agreement with Höegh Maritime Management pursuant to which Höegh Maritime Management provides crew to the Höegh Gallant. During their period of service, the crew members remain employees of Höegh Maritime Management, but are seconded to, and operate under the instruction and supervision of, Höegh Cyprus. Either party may terminate the secondment agreement upon six months’ written notice to the other party or upon a material breach by the other party (not cured within 10 days). Höegh Cyprus reimburses Höegh Maritime Management for the salaries and other expenses of the seconded employees. Höegh Cyprus also reimburses Höegh Maritime Management for any amount paid to manning agents used for hiring crew, plus a service fee equal to 5.0% of such amount and an administration fee of up to $5,000, with all payments made in U.S. Dollars. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, Höegh Maritime Management charged approximately $2.6 million, $2.9 million and $2.9 million to Höegh Cyprus pursuant to the secondment agreement.

 

145

 

 

Höegh Grace Services Agreements

 

Höegh Colombia and Höegh FSRU IV have entered into several agreements with affiliates of Höegh LNG and Höegh Autoliners Ltd. to provide services related to the Höegh Grace (the “Höegh Grace Services Agreements”):

 

  · a manning agreement with Höegh Fleet Services Philippines Inc. (an affiliate of Höegh Autoliners Ltd.) to recruit and engage crew for the vessel, including planning the crew rotation schedule, processing employment contracts and arranging visas and travel to the vessel; in exchange for reimbursement of costs, plus a service fee equal to 5.0%;

 

  · a technical services agreement with Höegh Norway to provide technical services for the vessel, including arranging for the provision of bunker fuel, operational support, providing access to the information technology systems of Höegh LNG and providing technical information and supporting documentation as requested by Höegh Colombia; in exchange for specified hourly rates, plus a service fee equal to 3.0% and an additional fee calculated based on the scope of use of Höegh LNG’s information technology systems;

 

  · a management consulting agreement with Höegh Norway to provide support related to certain management activities, including support and advice to the management of Höegh Colombia regarding operational and financial matters, assistance with the preparation of budgets and the provision of controller functions for financial matters; in exchange for specified hourly rates, plus a service fee equal to 3.0%;

 

  · a crew recruitment consulting services agreement with Höegh Maritime Management to provide professional consulting services in connection with recruitment of crew and other employees, including evaluating and recommending to Höegh Colombia individuals that meet its hiring specifications, executing employment contracts with individuals approved by Höegh Colombia and arranging visas and travel to the vessel; in exchange for reimbursement of costs, plus a 5.0% fee charged on certain administrative costs and on any amount paid to manning agents used for hiring crew;

 

  · an agreement for provision of professional payment services with Höegh Maritime Management to provide services in connection with the payment of monthly salaries to the crew and employees working on the vessel; in exchange for reimbursement of costs, plus a service fee equal to 5.0%; and

 

  · a spare parts procurement and insurance services agreement with Höegh LNG Management to arrange for the supply of spare parts and the insurance coverage for the vessel; in exchange for an annual fee plus reimbursement of certain expenses.

 

Höegh Colombia and Höegh FSRU IV paid an aggregate of approximately $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.5 million to the service providers under the Höegh Grace Services Agreements for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Revolving Credit Facility with Höegh LNG

 

In connection with the closing of the IPO, we entered into an unsecured $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG, to be used to fund acquisitions and our working capital requirements. The revolving credit facility’s original maturity date was January 1, 2020. Interest on drawn amounts was payable quarterly at an original rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 4.0%. On May 28, 2019, the repayment date on the $85 million revolving credit facility was extended to January 1, 2023 and the terms amended for the interest rate to be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.4% in 2019, 3.0% in 2020 and 4.0% thereafter.

 

Originally, we were required to pay a 1.4% annual commitment fee to Höegh LNG on undrawn available amounts under the revolving credit facility. On January 29, 2018, the revolving credit facility was amended eliminating the requirement to pay a commitment fee on the undrawn balance of the facility. Drawings on the revolving credit facility are subject to customary conditions precedent, including absence of a default or event of default and accuracy of representations and warranties in all material respects.

 

For a more detailed description of this credit facility, please read “Item 5.B—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Revolving Credit Facility Due to Owners and Affiliates.”

 

License Agreement

 

At the closing of the IPO, we entered into a license agreement with Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd., pursuant to which Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. granted to us a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty-free license to use the name and unregistered trademark “Höegh LNG” and a flag and funnel mark. The license agreement will terminate, upon the election of Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd., if Höegh LNG ceases to control our general partner or Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. beneficially owns less than 34% of the issued shares of Höegh LNG.

 

146

 

 

Time Charter and Option for the Höegh Gallant

 

The Höegh Gallant is currently operating under a time charter with EgyptCo, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, that expires in 2020. In addition, we have entered into an option agreement with Höegh LNG pursuant to which we have the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025 at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter with EgyptCo, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. The Partnership exercised its option on February 27, 2020, pursuant to the option agreement and intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant (the “Subsequent Charter”), the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

Acquisition of the Höegh Grace

 

On January 3, 2017, we closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding, the entity that owns Höegh FSRU IV and Höegh Colombia, the entities that own and operate the Höegh Grace (together with Höegh Colombia Holding, the “Höegh Grace entities”) for cash consideration of $91.8 million, excluding the working capital adjustment.

 

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities with a combination of cash consideration of $45.3 million and draws on the revolving credit facility of $41.4 million.

 

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreements entered into with respect to the acquisition of the 51% and 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

 

  · losses from breach of warranty;
  · losses related to certain environmental liabilities, damages or repair costs and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Grace prior to January 3, 2017;
  · any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to tax authorities with respect to payroll taxes, taxes related to social security payments, corporate income taxes (including income tax for equality and surcharge on income tax for equality), withholding tax, port associations, local Cartagena tax, and financial transaction tax, including any penalties associated with taxes to the extent not reimbursed by the charterer;
  · any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the Höegh Grace charter with SPEC; and
  · any losses suffered or incurred in relation to the performance guarantee we have provided with respect to the Höegh Grace charter, up to Höegh LNG’s pro rata share of such losses, based on its remaining ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding. This provision is not applicable after December 1, 2017, when we acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

For a more detailed description of the Höegh Grace time charter with SPEC and the Gallant/Grace facility, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Höegh Grace Charter” and “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Long-term Debt—Gallant/Grace Facility,” respectively.

 

Other Related Party Transactions

 

Our activities were an integrated part of Höegh LNG until the closing of the IPO on August 12, 2014. We entered into several agreements with Höegh LNG (and certain of its subsidiaries) for the provision of services. As such, Höegh LNG has provided general and corporate management services to us. A subsidiary of Höegh LNG provides ship management for PGN FSRU Lampung, Höegh Gallant and Höegh Grace. Refer to note 15 of our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

147

 

 

Amounts for related party transactions included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 or capitalized or recorded in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

   Year ended 
Statement of income:  December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant  $47,173    47,108   $46,382 
Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Höegh LNG           (2,496)
Vessel operating and administrative expenses   (28,408)   (25,191)   (24,408)
Interest income from joint ventures and demand note   295    273    370 
Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG   (1,882)   (2,938)   (3,934)
Total  $17,178    19,252   $15,914 

 

 

Balance sheet:  As of December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Equity:          
Cash contribution for indemnifications payments from Höegh LNG  $   $1,701 
Repayment of indemnification received from Höegh LNG   (64)   (2,353)
Issuance of units for board of directors' fees   194    200 
Other and contribution from owner   485    472 
Total  $615   $20 

 

Our trade liabilities, revolving credit facility and shareholder loans to Höegh LNG and affiliates were $11.3 million and $39.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The outstanding revolving credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of 6.6% and 6.3% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

Distributions to Höegh LNG

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we paid quarterly distributions totaling $73.8 million, $72.5 million and $57.0 million of which $28.4 million, $28.2 million and $27.0 million were paid to Höegh LNG, respectively.

 

  C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel

 

Not applicable.

 

148

 

 

Item 8. Financial Information
   

 

  A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

 

Please read “Item 18—Financial Statements” below for additional information required to be disclosed under this item.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of our business, principally personal injury and property casualty claims. These claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. Refer to note 18 “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for a description of certain claims made against us.

 

The Partnership’s Cash Distribution Policy

 

Rationale for Our Cash Distribution Policy

 

Our cash distribution policy reflects a judgment that our unitholders will be better served by our distributing our available cash (after deducting expenses, including estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures and reserves) rather than retaining it. Because we believe we will generally finance any expansion capital expenditures from external financing sources, we believe that our unitholders are best served by our distributing all of our available cash. Our cash distribution policy is consistent with the terms of our partnership agreement, which requires that we distribute all of our available cash quarterly (after deducting expenses, including estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures and reserves).

 

Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our Ability to Change Our Cash Distribution Policy

 

There is no guarantee that unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from us. Our distribution policy is subject to certain restrictions and may be changed at any time, including:

 

  · Our unitholders have no contractual or other legal right to receive distributions other than the obligation under our partnership agreement to distribute available cash on a quarterly basis, which is subject to the broad discretion of our board of directors to establish reserves and other limitations.

 

  · We will be subject to restrictions on distributions under our financing agreements. Our financing agreements contain material financial tests and covenants that must be satisfied in order to pay distributions. If we are unable to satisfy the restrictions included in any of our financing agreements or are otherwise in default under any of those agreements, as a result of our debt levels or otherwise, we will not be able to make cash distributions to unitholders, notwithstanding our stated cash distribution policy. These financial tests and covenants are described in this Annual Report in “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

 

  · A part of our business is currently conducted through our joint ventures. Under the joint venture agreement that governs our joint ventures that own the Neptune and the Cape Ann, our joint ventures are prohibited from making distributions under certain circumstances, including when they have outstanding shareholder loans. In addition, we are unable to cause our joint ventures to make distributions without the agreement of our joint venture partners. Under the joint ventures’ bank debt facilities certain covenants and restrictions apply to making distributions. In order to make distributions for the shareholder loans or dividends, a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio must be met. As of December 31, 2019, both the 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratios were met by the joint venture owning the Neptune. As a result, the joint venture owning the Neptune qualifies to make payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions. However, as of December 31, 2019, the 1.20 projected debt service coverage ratio was not met by the joint venture owning the Cape Ann. As a result, no payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions can be made by joint venture owning the Cape Ann until the debt service coverage ratio is met in future periods. Further, our joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Refer to note 10 “Advances to joint ventures” and note 18 “Commitments and Contingencies” of our consolidated financial statements and “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information. If our joint ventures are unable to make distributions to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to pay cash distributions to unitholders in accordance with our stated cash distribution policy.

 

  · We are required to make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and replace our fleet. These expenditures may fluctuate significantly over time, particularly as our vessels near the end of their useful lives. In order to minimize these fluctuations, our partnership agreement requires us to deduct estimated, as opposed to actual, maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from the amount of cash that we would otherwise have available for distribution to our unitholders. In years when estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures are higher than actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, the amount of cash available for distribution to unitholders will be lower than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted.

 

149

 

 

 

  · Although our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our available cash, our partnership agreement, including provisions contained therein requiring us to make cash distributions, may be amended. Our partnership agreement can be amended with the approval of a majority of the outstanding common units. Höegh LNG owns approximately 45.8% of our common units as of March 31, 2020.

 

  · Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount of distributions we pay under our cash distribution policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined by our board of directors, taking into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement.

 

  · The Series A preferred units rank senior to our common units as to payments of distributions. Therefore, we will not be able to pay distributions to our common unitholders if we have failed to pay distributions to our Series A preferred units.

 

  · Under Section 51 of the Marshall Islands Act, we may not make a distribution to unitholders if, after giving effect to the distribution, our liabilities, other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interest and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specified property of ours, exceed the fair value of our assets, except that the fair value of property that is subject to a liability for which the recourse of creditors is limited shall be included in our assets only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds that liability.

  

  · PT Höegh is subject to restrictions on distributions under Indonesian laws due to its formation under the laws of Indonesia. Under Article 71.3 of the Indonesian Company Law (Law No. 40 of 2007), dividend distributions may be made only if PT Höegh has positive retained earnings. In addition, PT Höegh as an Indonesian incorporated company is required to establish a statutory reserve equal to 20% of its paid-up capital. The dividend can only be distributed if PT Höegh’s retained earnings are positive after deduction of the statutory reserve. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung had not established the required statutory reserves as of December 31, 2019. Therefore, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung cannot make dividend payments under Indonesian law. However, subject to meeting a debt service ratio of 1.20 to1.00, PT Höegh can distribute cash from its cash flow from operations to us as payment of intercompany accrued interest and / or intercompany debt, after quarterly payments of the Lampung facility and fulfilment of the “waterfall” provisions to meet operating requirements as defined by the Lampung facility. Höegh Lampung, our subsidiary holding the ownership interest in PT Höegh, is subject to restrictions under Singapore law due to its formation under Singapore law. Under Section 403(1) of the Companies Act (Cap. 50) of Singapore, no dividends shall be payable to the shareholders of any company except out of profits.

 

  · Under Cayman Islands law, Höegh Colombia Holding and Höegh FSRU IV may only pay dividends distributions out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distribution. Dividends from Höegh Cyprus may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company.

 

  · Our joint ventures for the Neptune and the Cape Ann are subject to restrictions on distributions under the laws of the Cayman Islands due to their formation under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Under such laws, a dividend distribution may only be paid out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distribution.

 

  · We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our unitholders due to decreases in total operating revenues, decreases in hire rates, the loss of a vessel, increases in operating or general and administrative expenses, principal and interest payments on outstanding debt, taxes, working capital requirements, maintenance and replacement capital expenditures or anticipated cash needs. Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors” for a discussion of these factors.

 

Estimated Maintenance and Replacement Capital Expenditures

 

Our partnership agreement requires our board of directors to deduct from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, as opposed to actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, in order to reduce disparities in operating surplus caused by fluctuating maintenance and replacement capital expenditures. To the extent that our charterers reimburse our joint ventures or us, as applicable, for anticipated drydocking expenses, these are excluded from maintenance capital expenditures.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, our estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures for us and our joint ventures was $20.7 million per year for future vessel replacement and drydocking. Changes to our estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures for us and our joint ventures are assessed by our board of directors, with the approval of the conflicts committee. Estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures are based on assumptions regarding the remaining useful life of the vessels in our fleet, a net investment rate equivalent to our current expected long-term borrowing costs, vessel replacement values based on current market conditions, the residual value of the vessels at the end of their useful lives based on current steel prices, estimated expenditures for drydocking not reimbursable under time charters and an assumed level of inflation. The actual cost of replacing the vessels in our fleet will depend on a number of factors, including prevailing market conditions, hire rates and the availability and cost of financing at the time of replacement.

 

150

 

 

Our board of directors, with the approval of the conflicts committee, may from time to time determine that one or more of our assumptions should be revised, which could cause our board of directors to adjust the amount of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures. Furthermore, we may elect to finance some or all of our maintenance and replacement capital expenditures through the issuance of additional common units, which could be dilutive to existing unitholders.

 

Please read “Item 3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Inherent in Our Business—We must make substantial capital expenditures to maintain and replace the operating capacity of our fleet, which will reduce our cash available for distribution. In addition, each quarter we will be required, pursuant to our partnership agreement, to deduct estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus, which may result in less cash available to unitholders than if actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures were deducted.”

 

Minimum Quarterly Distribution

 

Common unitholders are entitled under our partnership agreement to receive a quarterly distribution of $0.3375 per unit to the extent we have sufficient cash on hand to pay the distribution, after establishment of cash reserves, distribution payments on the Series A preferred units and payment of fees and expenses. There is no guarantee that we will pay the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units in any quarter. Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount of distributions paid under our policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined by our board of directors, taking into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement. We are prohibited from making any distributions to unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or an event of default is then existing, under our financing arrangements. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities” for a discussion of the restrictions contained in our credit facilities.

 

Subordination Period

 

The subordination period, as defined in our partnership agreement, for the subordinated units ended on August 16, 2019. All of the 13,156,060 subordinated units, which were owned by Höegh LNG, converted to common units on a one-for-one basis and have the same rights as other common units.

 

Incentive Distribution Rights

 

Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved. Höegh LNG currently holds the incentive distribution rights. The incentive distribution rights may be transferred separately from any other interest, subject to restrictions in our partnership agreement. Any transfer by Höegh LNG of the incentive distribution rights would not change the percentage allocations of quarterly distributions with respect to such rights.

 

The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of the additional available cash from operating surplus among the unitholders and the holders of the incentive distribution rights up to the various target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under “Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions” are the percentage interests of the unitholders and the holders of the incentive distribution rights in any available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and including the corresponding amount in the column “Total Quarterly Distribution Target Amount,” until available cash from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for the unitholders and the holders of the incentive distribution rights for the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution.

 

   Total Quarterly
Distribution
 

Marginal Percentage Interest

in Distributions

 
   Target Amount  Unitholders   Holders of IDRs 
First Target Distribution  up to $0.388125   100%   0%
   above $0.388125          
Second Target Distribution  up to $0.421875   85%   15%
   above $0.421875          
Third Target Distribution  up to $0.50625   75%   25%
Thereafter  above $0.50625   50%   50%

 

  B.  Significant changes

 

Not applicable.

 

151

 

 

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

 

  A.  Offer and Listing Details

 

Not applicable.

 

  B.  Plan of Distribution

 

Not applicable.

 

  C.  Markets

 

Our common units started trading on the NYSE under the symbol “HMLP” on August 8, 2014.

 

Our Series A preferred units began trading on the NYSE under the symbol “HMLP PRA” on October 9, 2017.

 

  D.  Selling Unitholders

 

Not applicable.

  

  E.  Dilution

 

Not applicable.

  

  F.  Expenses of the Issue

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 10. Additional Information

 

  A.  Share Capital

 

Not applicable.

 

  B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association

 

The information required to be disclosed under Item 10B is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to this Annual Report.

 

152

 

 

  C. Material Contracts

 

The following is a summary of each material contract, other than material contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party, for the two years immediately preceding the date of this Annual Report:

 

  (1) Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 8, 2014, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement.”

 

  (2) Omnibus Agreement, dated August 12, 2014, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC, as supplemented by a letter agreement dated August 12, 2015. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Omnibus Agreement.”

 

  (3) 2014 Höegh LNG Partners LP Long-Term Incentive Plan. Please read “Item 6.B. Compensation.”

 

  (4) Höegh LNG Partners LP Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan. Please read “Item 6.B. Compensation.”

 

  (5) Employment Contract, dated November 26, 2013, between Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited and Richard Tyrrell.

 

  (6) Employment Contract, dated June 9, 2010 between Steffen Føreid and Höegh LNG AS, as amended November 28, 2018. Please read “Item 6.B. Compensation.”

 

  (7)

Administrative Services Agreement, dated December 20, 2019, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Höegh LNG AS. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements—Höegh Norway Administrative Services Agreement.”

 

  (8) Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 2, 2014, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Höegh LNG Services Ltd., as amended. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements—Prior Administrative Services Agreements.”

 

  (9) Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 2, 2014, between Höegh LNG Services Ltd and Höegh LNG AS, as amended. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements—Prior Administrative Services Agreements.”

 

  (10) Administrative Services Agreement, dated October 28, 2014, between Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements—Prior Administrative Services Agreements.”

 

  (11) Administrative Services Agreement, dated October 28, 2014, between Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited and Höegh LNG Services Ltd. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Administrative Services Agreements—Prior Administrative Services Agreements.”

 

  (12) Commercial and Administration Management Agreement, dated November 24, 2009, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Höegh LNG AS (Neptune). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Commercial and Administration Management Agreements.”

 

  (13) Commercial and Administration Management Agreement, dated May 19, 2010, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Höegh LNG AS (Cape Ann). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Commercial and Administration Management Agreements.”

 

  (14) Commercial and Administration Management Agreement, dated May 31, 2010, between Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. (as successor to HöeghStream LNG Ltd.) and Höegh LNG AS (Höegh Gallant).

 

  (15) Management Agreement, dated March 27, 2015, between Höegh Cyprus and Höegh LNG AS (Höegh Gallant). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Gallant Management Agreement.”

 

153

 

 

  (16) Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (Neptune). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (17) Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (Cape Ann). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (18) Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated March 24, 2015, between Höegh LNG Cyprus and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (Höegh Gallant). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (19) Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated October 17, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (Höegh Grace ). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (20) Technical Information and Services Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG AS (PGN FSRU Lampung). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (21) Master Spare Parts Supply Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG Asia Pte. Ltd. (PGN FSRU Lampung). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Master Spare Parts Supply Agreement.”

 

  (22) Master Maintenance Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG Shipping Services Pte Ltd (PGN FSRU Lampung). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Master Maintenance Agreement.”

 

  (23) Sub-Technical Support Agreement, dated April 11, 2014, between Höegh LNG AS and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Ship Management Agreements and Sub-Technical Agreements.”

 

  (24) Intercompany Agreement Regarding Secondment of Employees, dated March 31, 2015, between Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. and Höegh Cyprus, as amended by Addendum No.1, dated November 17, 2015. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Secondment Agreement.”

 

  (25) Manning Agreement, dated September 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh Fleet Services Philippines Inc. (Höegh Grace). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (26) Management Consulting Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG AS (Höegh Grace). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (27) Agreement for the Provision of Professional Payment Services, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. ( Höegh Grace ). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (28) Crew Recruitment Consulting Services Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. (Höegh Grace). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (29) Spare Parts Procurement and Insurance Services Agreement, dated October 25, 2016, between Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (Höegh Grace). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (30) Technical Services Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG AS (Höegh Grace). Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Höegh Grace Services Agreements.”

 

  (31) SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated March 20, 2007, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Suez LNG Trading SA, as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., GDF Suez LNG Trading SA (formerly known as Suez LNG Trading SA) and GDF Suez Global LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated February 23, 2015, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 2, dated February 23, 2015, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 3, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by the Deed of Novation and Amendment, dated December 20, 2019, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., Global LNG SAS and Total Gas & Power Limited, as amended by Amendment No. 5, dated April 1, 2020, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Total Gas & Power Limited (Neptune). Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Neptune Time Charter.”

 

154

 

 

  (32) SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated March 20, 2007, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Suez LNG Trading SA, as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., Suez LNG Trading SA and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., GDF Suez LNG Trading SA (formerly known as Suez LNG Trading SA) and GDF Suez Global LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated June 20, 2012, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 2, dated June 20, 2012, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as supplemented by the Side Letter, dated November 17, 2013, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 3, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 4, dated October 23, 2017, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as supplemented by the Side Letter, dated October 27, 2017, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by the Deed of Novation and Amendment, dated December 20, 2019, among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., Global LNG SAS and Total Gas & Power Limited, as amended by Amendment No. 5, dated February 20, 2020, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Total Gas & Power Limited, as amended by Amendment No. 6, dated April 1, 2020, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Total Gas & Power Limited (Cape Ann). Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters.”

 

  (33) Amendment and Restatement Agreement of the Original Lease, Operation and Maintenance Agreement, dated January 25, 2012, between Höegh LNG Ltd. and PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, as novated by the Novation Agreement for Amended & Restated Lease, Operation & Maintenance Agreement, dated September 18, 2013, among PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, Höegh LNG Ltd. and PT Höegh LNG Lampung, as novated by the Novation Agreement for Amended & Restated Lease, Operation & Maintenance Agreement, dated February 21, 2014, among PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, PT PGN LNG Indonesia and PT Höegh LNG Lampung ( PGN FSRU Lampung ). Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter.”

 

  (34) Lease and Maintenance Agreement, dated April 15, 2015, between Höegh Cyprus, acting through its Egypt Branch, and Höegh LNG Egypt LLC (Höegh Gallant). Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Höegh Gallant Time Charter.”

 

  (35) International Leasing Agreement, dated November 1, 2014, between Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P., as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated September 24, 2015 (Höegh Grace ). “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Höegh Grace Charter.”

 

  (36) FSRU Operation and Services Agreement, dated November 1, 2014, between Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P., as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated September 24, 2015, as novated by the Deed of Novation, dated October 18, 2016, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P. ( Höegh Grace ). “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Höegh Grace Charter.”

 

  (37) Second Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, dated July 18, 2014, among Mitsui O.S.K Lines, Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd. Please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements.”

 

  (38) Shareholders’ Agreement, dated March 13, 2013, between Höegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd. and PT Bahtera Daya Utama. Please read Item 4.B. Business Overview—Shareholder Agreements.”

 

  (39) Novation Deed, dated August 31, 2010, among Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Ltd.

 

  (40) Novation Deed, dated August 31, 2010, among Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd.

 

  (41) Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated October 9, 2013, among Höegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd., PT Bahtera Daya Utama and PT Imeco Inter Sarana.

 

  (42) Revolving Loan Agreement, dated August 12, 2014, between Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. in the amount of $85,000,000, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated February 28, 2016, Amendment No. 2, dated January 29, 2018 and Amendment No. 3, dated May 28, 2019. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Revolving Credit Facility with Höegh LNG.”

 

  (43) Neptune Facility Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Amendment Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated August 26, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated July 25, 2014, the Amendment Agreement, dated February 24, 2015, the Amendment Agreement dated December 7, 2016 and the Amendment Agreement dated December 20, 2019. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Joint Ventures Debt—Neptune Facility.”

 

155

 

 

  (44) Cape Ann Facility Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Amendment Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated August 26, 2010, the Amendment Agreement, dated June 29, 2012, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated July 25, 2014 and the Amendment Agreement dated December 20, 2019. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Joint Ventures Debt—Cape Ann Facility.”

 

  (45) $299 Million Lampung Facility Agreement, dated September 12, 2013, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Second Side Letter, dated December 18, 2014. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Lampung Facility.”

 

  (46) $412 Million Amended and Restated Facilities Agreement, dated March 17, 2016, between Höegh LNG Cyprus and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., as borrowers, and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Amendment Letter, dated December 23, 2016. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—Gallant/Grace Facility.”

  

  (47)

$385 Million Senior Secured Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated January 29, 2019, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, as borrower, and the other parties thereto. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Borrowing Activities—$385 Million Facility.”

 

  (48) License Agreement, between Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. and Höegh LNG Partners LP. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—License Agreement.”

 

  (49) Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 12, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC.

 

  (50) Letter Agreement, dated October 1, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Egypt LLC, Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC.

 

  (51) Option Agreement, dated October 1, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and Höegh LNG Partners LP. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Time Charter and Option for of the Höegh Gallant.”

 

  (52) Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 1, 2016, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Acquisition of the Höegh Grace.”

 

  (53) Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 16, 2017, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Acquisition of the Höegh Grace.”

 

  (54) Indemnification Agreement, dated September 27, 2017, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. Please read “Item 7.B. Related Party Transactions—Indemnification Agreement.”

 

  (55) At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, dated January 26, 2018, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and B. Riley FBR, Inc. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Cash Needs.”  

 

  (56) At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, dated October 18, 2019, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and B. Riley FBR, Inc. Please read “Item 5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Cash Needs.”  

  

156

 

 

  D.  Exchange Controls

 

We are not aware of any governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation, including foreign exchange controls, in the Republic of the Marshall Islands that may affect the import or export of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by the Partnership, or the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident and non-citizen holders of our securities.

 

  E.  Taxation

 

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to prospective unitholders.

 

This discussion is based upon provisions of the Code, Treasury Regulations and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all as in effect or existence on the date of this Annual Report and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretation, possibly with retroactive effect. Changes in these authorities may cause the tax consequences of unit ownership to vary substantially from the consequences described below. The following discussion applies only to beneficial owners of common units or Series A preferred units that own such units as “capital assets” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (i.e., generally, for investment purposes) and is not intended to be applicable to all categories of investors, such as unitholders subject to special tax rules (e.g., financial institutions, insurance companies, broker dealers, tax-exempt organizations, retirement plans or individual retirement accounts, persons who own (actually or constructively) 10.0% or more of the voting power or value of our equity, or former citizens or long-term residents of the United States), persons who hold the units as part of a straddle, conversion, constructive sale or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or persons that have a functional currency other than the U.S. Dollar, each of whom may be subject to tax rules that differ significantly from those summarized below. If a partnership or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our common units or Series A preferred units, the tax treatment of its partners generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding our common units or Series A preferred units, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences to you of the partnership’s ownership of such units.

 

No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding any matter affecting us or our unitholders. The statements made herein may be challenged by the IRS and, if so challenged, may not be sustained upon review in a court. This discussion does not contain information regarding any U.S. state or local, estate, gift or alternative minimum tax considerations concerning the ownership or disposition of common units or Series A preferred units. This discussion does not comment on all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be important to particular unitholders in light of their individual circumstances, and each prospective unitholder is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, state, local and other tax consequences of the ownership or disposition of common units or Series A preferred units.

 

Election to be Treated as a Corporation

 

We have elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, among other things, U.S. Holders (as defined below) will not be directly subject to U.S. federal income tax on our income, but rather will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on distributions received from us and dispositions of units as described below.

 

U.S. Federal Income Taxation of U.S. Holders

 

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common units or Series A preferred units that is:

 

  · an individual U.S. citizen or resident (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes),

 

  · a corporation (or other entity that is classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the United States or any of its political subdivisions,

 

  · an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or

 

  · a trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) the trust has a valid election in effect to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

157

 

 

U.S. Federal Taxation of Distributions

 

Subject to the discussion below of the rules applicable to PFICs, any distributions to a U.S. Holder made by us with respect to our Series A preferred units generally will constitute dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, allocated to our Series A preferred units, and any distributions to a U.S. Holder made by us with respect to our common units generally will constitute dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, allocable to our common units. Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits allocable to our Series A preferred units or common units, as applicable, will be treated first as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its Series A preferred units or common units and, thereafter, as capital gain. U.S. Holders that are corporations generally will not be entitled to claim a dividend received deduction with respect to distributions they receive from us because we are not a U.S. corporation. Dividends received with respect to our common units and Series A preferred units generally will be treated as “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Dividends received with respect to our common units or Series A preferred units by a U.S. Holder that is an individual, trust or estate (a “U.S. Individual Holder”) generally will be treated as “qualified dividend income,” which is currently taxable to such U.S. Individual Holder at preferential capital gain tax rates provided that: (i) our common units or Series A preferred units, as applicable, are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as the NYSE on which our common units and our Series A preferred units are listed); (ii) we are not a PFIC for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (which we do not believe we are, have been or will be, as discussed below under “—PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences”); (iii) the U.S. Individual Holder has owned the common units or Series A preferred units for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the common units or Series A preferred units, as applicable, become ex-dividend (and has not entered into certain risk limiting transactions with respect to such units); and (iv) the U.S. Individual Holder is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. There is no assurance that any dividends paid on our common units or Series A preferred units will be eligible for these preferential rates in the hands of a U.S. Individual Holder, and any dividends paid on our common units or Series A preferred units that are not eligible for these preferential rates will be taxed as ordinary income to a U.S. Individual Holder.

 

Special rules may apply to any amounts received in respect of our common units or Series A preferred units that are treated as “extraordinary dividends.” In general, an extraordinary dividend is a dividend with respect to a common unit that is equal to or in excess of 10.0% of the unitholder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value upon the unitholder’s election) in such common unit , and a dividend with respect to a Series A preferred unit that is equal to or in excess of 5.0% of a unitholder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value upon the unitholder’s election) in such Series A preferred unit. In addition, extraordinary dividends include dividends received within a one-year period that, in the aggregate, equal or exceed 20.0% of a unitholder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value). If we pay an “extraordinary dividend” on our common units or Series A preferred units that is treated as “qualified dividend income,” then any loss recognized by a U.S. Individual Holder from the sale or exchange of such common units or Series A preferred units will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of such dividend.

 

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Units and Series A Preferred Units

 

Subject to the discussion of PFIC status below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such units. The U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in its common units or Series A preferred units generally will be the U.S. Holder’s purchase price for the units and that tax basis will be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of any distributions on such units that are treated as non-taxable returns of capital (as discussed above under “—U.S. Federal Taxation of Distributions”). Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’s holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Certain U.S. Holders (including individuals) may be eligible for preferential rates of U.S. federal income tax in respect of long-term capital gains. A U.S. Holder’s ability to deduct capital losses is subject to limitations. Such capital gain or loss generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

 

Medicare Tax on Net Investment Income

 

Certain U.S. Holders, including individuals, estates and trusts, will be subject to an additional 3.8% Medicare tax on, among other things, dividends and capital gains from the sale or other disposition of equity interests. For individuals, the additional Medicare tax applies to the lesser of (i) “net investment income” or (ii) the excess of “modified adjusted gross income” over $200,000 ($250,000 if married and filing jointly or $125,000 if married and filing separately). “Net investment income” generally equals the taxpayer’s gross investment income reduced by deductions that are allocable to such income. Unitholders should consult their tax advisors regarding the implications of the additional Medicare tax resulting from their ownership and disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units.

 

158

 

 

PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences

 

Adverse U.S. federal income tax rules apply to a U.S. Holder that owns an equity interest in a non-U.S. corporation that is classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, we will be treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which the holder held our common units or Series A preferred units, either:

 

  · at least 75.0% of our gross income (including our pro rata share of the gross income of our vessel-owning joint ventures and subsidiaries) for such taxable year consists of passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or

 

  · at least 50.0% of the average of the values of the assets held by us (including our pro rata share of the assets of our vessel-owning joint ventures and subsidiaries) during such taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income.

 

Income earned, or treated as earned (for U.S. federal income tax purposes), by us in connection with the performance of services would not constitute passive income for PFIC purposes. By contrast, rental income generally would constitute “passive income” unless we were treated as deriving that rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business under the applicable rules.

 

Based on our current and projected methods of operation, we believe that we were not a PFIC for any prior taxable year, and we expect that we will not be treated as a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. We believe that more than 25.0% of our gross income for each taxable year was or will be nonpassive income, and more than 50.0% of the average value of our assets for each such year was or will be held for the production of such nonpassive income. This belief is based on valuations and projections regarding our assets, income and charters, and its validity is conditioned on the accuracy of such valuations and projections. While we believe these valuations and projections are accurate, the shipping market is volatile, and no assurance can be given that they will continue to be accurate at any time in the future.

 

Moreover, there are legal uncertainties in determining whether the income derived from our time-chartering activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. While there is legal authority supporting our conclusions, including IRS pronouncements concerning the characterization of income derived from time charters as services income, the Fifth Circuit held in Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009) that income derived from certain marine time charter agreements should be treated as rental income rather than services income for purposes of a “foreign sales corporation” provision of the Code. In that case, the Fifth Circuit did not address the definition of passive income or the PFIC rules; however, the reasoning of the case could have implications as to how the income from a time charter would be classified under such rules. If the reasoning of this case were extended to the PFIC context, the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering activities may be treated as rental income, and we would likely be treated as a PFIC. The IRS has announced its nonacquiescence with the court’s holding in the Tidewater case and, at the same time, announced the position of the IRS that the marine time charter agreements at issue in that case should be treated as service contracts.

 

Distinguishing between arrangements treated as generating rental income and those treated as generating services income involves weighing and balancing competing factual considerations, and there is no legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our specific method of operation. Conclusions in this area therefore remain matters of interpretation. We are not seeking a ruling from the IRS on the treatment of income generated from our time chartering operations. Thus, it is possible that the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to avoid being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the nature of our operations will not change in the future and that we will not become a PFIC in any future taxable year.

 

As discussed more fully below, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year (and regardless of whether we remain a PFIC for subsequent taxable years), a U.S. Holder would be subject to different taxation rules depending on whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a “Qualified Electing Fund,” which we refer to as a “QEF election.” As an alternative to making a QEF election, a U.S. Holder should be able to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common units or Series A preferred units, as discussed below. If we are a PFIC, a U.S. Holder will be subject to the PFIC rules described herein with respect to any of our subsidiaries that are PFICs. However, the mark-to-market election discussed below will likely not be available with respect to shares of such PFIC subsidiaries. In addition, if a U.S. Holder owns our common units or Series A preferred units during any taxable year that we are a PFIC, such holder must file an annual report with the IRS.

 

159

 

 

Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a Timely QEF Election

 

If a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election (an “Electing Holder”), then, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, that holder must report as income for its taxable year its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain, if any, for our taxable years that end with or within the taxable year for which that holder is reporting, regardless of whether or not the Electing Holder received distributions from us in that year. The Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common units or Series A preferred units will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that were previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction in the Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common units or Series A preferred units and will not be taxed again once distributed. An Electing Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units. A U.S. Holder makes a QEF election with respect to any year that we are a PFIC by filing IRS Form 8621 with its U.S. federal income tax return. If contrary to our expectations, we determine that we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we will provide each U.S. Holder with the information necessary to make the QEF election described above.

 

Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a “Mark-to-Market” Election

 

If we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which a U.S. Holder holds our common units or Series A preferred units and, as we anticipate, our common units or Series A preferred units were treated as “marketable stock,” then, as an alternative to making a QEF election, a U.S. Holder would be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common units or Series A preferred units, as applicable, provided the U.S. Holder completes and files IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the relevant instructions and related Treasury Regulations. If that election is made, the U.S. Holder generally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the U.S. Holder’s common units or Series A preferred units, as applicable, at the end of the taxable year over the holder’s adjusted tax basis in such units. The U.S. Holder also would be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common units or Series A preferred units over the fair market value thereof at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its common units or Series A preferred units would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss recognized. Gain recognized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss recognized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common units or Series A preferred units , as applicable, would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included in income by the U.S. Holder. Because the mark-to-market election only applies to marketable stock, however, it would not apply to a U.S. Holder’s indirect interest in any of our subsidiaries that were determined to be PFICs.

 

Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market Election

 

If we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which a U.S. Holder holds our common units or Series A preferred units, a U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF election or a “mark-to-market” election for that year (a “Non-Electing Holder”) would be subject to special rules resulting in increased tax liability with respect to (i) any excess distribution (i.e., the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder on our common units or Series A preferred units in a taxable year in excess of 125.0% of the average annual distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing Holder’s holding period for such units) and (ii) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the units. Under these special rules:

 

  · the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing Holder’s aggregate holding period for the common units or Series A preferred units;

 

  · the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable year prior to the taxable year we were first treated as a PFIC with respect to the Non-Electing Holder would be taxed as ordinary income; and

 

  · the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax on ordinary income in effect for the applicable class of taxpayers for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed tax deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.

 

These penalties would not apply to a qualified pension, profit sharing or other retirement trust or other tax-exempt organization that did not borrow money or otherwise utilize leverage in connection with its acquisition of our common units or Series A preferred units. If we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and a Non-Electing Holder who is an individual dies while owning our common units or Series A preferred units, such holder’s successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such units.

 

160

 

 

U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders

 

A beneficial owner of our common units or Series A preferred units (other than a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not a U.S. Holder is referred to as a Non-U.S. Holder. If you are a partner in a partnership (or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holding our common units or Series A preferred units, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences to you of the partnership’s ownership of such units.

 

Distributions

 

Distributions we pay to a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax if the Non-U.S. Holder is not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, our distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as a U.S. Holder to the extent they constitute income effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. trade or business (provided, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder entitled to the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States, such distributions also are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment). The after-tax amount of any effectively connected dividends received by a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a 30.0% rate (or, if applicable, a lower treaty rate).

 

Disposition of Units

 

In general, a Non-U.S. Holder is not subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain resulting from the disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units provided the Non-U.S. Holder is not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. A Non-U.S. Holder that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as a U.S. Holder in the event the gain from the disposition of units is effectively connected with the conduct of such U.S. trade or business (provided, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder entitled to the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States, such gain also is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment). The after-tax amount of any effectively connected gain of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes may also be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a rate of 30.0% (or, if applicable, a lower treaty rate). However, even if not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, individual Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to tax on gain resulting from the disposition of our common units or Series A preferred units if they are present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year in which those units are disposed and meet certain other requirements.

 

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

 

In general, payments to a non-corporate U.S. Holder of distributions or the proceeds of a disposition of common units or Series A preferred units will be subject to information reporting. These payments to a non-corporate U.S. Holder also may be subject to backup withholding if the non-corporate U.S. Holder:

 

  · fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number;

 

  · is notified by the IRS that it has failed to report all interest or corporate distributions required to be reported on its U.S. federal income tax returns; or

 

  · in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable certification requirements.

 

Non-U.S. Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying their status on IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI, W-8EXP or W-8IMY, as applicable.

 

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, a unitholder generally may obtain a credit for any amount withheld against its liability for U.S. federal income tax (and obtain a refund of any amounts withheld in excess of such liability) by timely filing a U.S. federal income tax return with the IRS.

 

In addition, individual citizens or residents of the United States holding certain “foreign financial assets” (which generally includes stock and other securities issued by a foreign person unless held in an account maintained by a financial institution) that exceed certain thresholds (the lowest being holding foreign financial assets with an aggregate value in excess of (i) $50,000 on the last day of the taxable year or (ii) $75,000 at any time during the taxable year) are required to report information relating to such assets. Significant penalties may apply for failure to satisfy these reporting obligations. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations, if any, that would result from their purchase, ownership or disposition of our units.

 

161

 

 

Non-United States Tax Consequences

 

The following is a discussion of the material non-U.S. tax considerations that may be relevant to prospective unitholders. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this section to “we,” “our” or “us” are references to Höegh LNG Partners LP.

 

Marshall Islands Tax Consequences

 

The following discussion is based on the current laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands applicable to persons who are not citizens of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and do not reside in, maintain offices in or engage in business, transactions or operations in the Republic of the Marshall Islands.

 

Because we and our subsidiaries do not and do not expect to conduct business, transactions or operations in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, under current Marshall Islands law you will not be subject to Marshall Islands taxation or withholding on distributions, including upon distribution treated as a return of capital, we make to you as a unitholder. In addition, you will not be subject to Marshall Islands stamp, capital gains or other taxes on the purchase, ownership or disposition of common units or Series A preferred units, and you will not be required by the Republic of the Marshall Islands to file a tax return relating to your ownership of units.

 

Norway Tax Consequences

 

The following is a discussion of the material Norwegian tax consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who are persons not resident in Norway for taxation purposes, which we refer to as “Non-Norwegian Holders.” Prospective unitholders who are resident in Norway for taxation purposes are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential Norwegian tax consequences to them of an investment in our common units. For this purpose, a company incorporated outside of Norway will be treated as resident in Norway in the event its central management and control is carried out in Norway.

 

Under the Tax Act on Income and Wealth, Non-Norwegian Holders will not be subject to any taxes in Norway on income or profits in respect of the acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of the common units or Series A preferred units, provided that we are not treated as carrying on business in Norway, and the Non-Norwegian Holder is not engaged in a Norwegian trade or business to which the common units or Series A preferred units are effectively connected, or if the Non-Norwegian Holder is resident in a country that has an income tax treaty with Norway, such holder does not have a permanent establishment in Norway to which the common units are effectively connected.

 

We believe that we will be able to conduct our affairs so that Non-Norwegian Holders should not be subject to Norwegian tax on the acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of the common units or Series A preferred units. However, this determination is dependent upon the facts existing at such time, including (but not limited to) the place where our board of directors meets and the place where our management makes decisions or takes certain actions affecting our business. We intend to conduct our affairs in a manner consistent with our Norwegian tax practice so that our business should not be treated as managed from or carried on in Norway for taxation purposes, and consequently, Non-Norwegian Holders should not be subject to tax in Norway solely by reason of the acquisition, holding, disposition or redemption of their common units or Series A preferred units. Nonetheless, there is no legal authority addressing our specific circumstances, and conclusions in this area remain matters of interpretation. Thus, it is possible that the Norwegian taxation authority could challenge, or a court could disagree with, our position.

 

While we do not expect it to be the case, if the arrangements we propose to enter into result in our being considered to carry on business in Norway for the purposes of the Tax Act on Income and Wealth, unitholders would be considered to be carrying on business in Norway and would be required to file tax returns with the Norwegian Tax Administration and, subject to any relief provided in any relevant double taxation treaty (including, in the case of holders resident in the United States, the U.S.-Norway Tax Treaty), would be subject to taxation in Norway on any income considered to be attributable to the business carried on in Norway.

 

162

 

 

  F.  Dividends and Paying Agents

 

Not applicable.

 

  G.  Statement by Experts

 

Not applicable.

 

  H.  Documents on Display

 

Documents concerning us that are referred to in this Annual Report may be inspected at our offices at Wessex House, 5th Floor, 45 Reid Street, Hamilton, HM12, Bermuda and may also be obtained from our website at www.hoeghlngpartners.com. Those documents electronically filed via the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system may also be obtained from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

  I.  Subsidiary Information

 

Not applicable.

 

163

 

 

Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange risks.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Interest rate swap contracts can be utilized to exchange a receipt of floating interest for a payment of fixed interest to reduce the exposure to interest rate variability on our outstanding floating rate debt. As of December 31, 2019, there are interest rate swap agreements on the Lampung and the $385 million facilities’ floating rate debt that are designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. Please read notes 16 and 17 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the following interest rate swap agreements were outstanding:

 

           Fair         
           value       Fixed 
   Interest       carrying       interest 
   rate   Notional   amount       rate 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  index    amount    liability   Term    (1)
LIBOR-based debt                         
Lampung interest rate swaps (2)   LIBOR    $117,022    (3,610)   Sep 2026    2.800%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR    $61,478    (3,241)   Jan 2026    2.941%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR    $61,478    (2,909)   Oct 2025    2.838%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478    (2,699)   Jan 2026    2.735%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478    (2,476)   Jan 2026    2.650%

   

(1) Excludes the margins paid on the floating-rate debt.
(2) All interest rate swaps are U.S. dollar denominated and principal amount reduces quarterly.

 

The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to interest rates:

 

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
Liabilities  2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   Thereafter   Total   Fair value   Rate(1) 
Long-term Debt                                             
Fixed rate  $6,667    6,667    6,667    6,667    6,667    17,832    51,167   $51,005    3.9%
                                              
Variable rate   37,993    116,890    18,930    18,930    18,930    203,284    414,957    420,811    4.3%
                                              
Interest Rate Swaps                                             
Variable to fixed  $2,907    3,461    2,867    2,323    1,823    1,553    14,934   $14,934    2.8%

 

(1) Rate refers to the weighted-average interest rate for our variable long-term debt, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt. The average variable to fixed rate for our interest rate swaps excludes the margin we pay on our drawn floating-rate debt. Please read note 13 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Foreign Currency Risk

 

All financing, interest expenses from financing and most of the Partnership’s revenue and expenditures for vessel improvements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Certain operating expenses can be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no derivative instruments have been used to manage foreign exchange risk.

 

164

 

 

Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties related to cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and interest rate swap agreements. Further, the Partnership has future exposure for Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to the Partnership for future time charter hire under the option exercised for the Höegh Gallant and for indemnification payments related to the boil-off claim for the joint ventures. Refer to note 18 of our consolidated financial statements. In order to minimize counterparty risk, bank relationships are established with counterparties with acceptable credit ratings at the time of the transactions. Credit risk related to receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customers’ or counterparty’s financial condition. PGN guarantees PGN LNG's obligations under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter. The other time charters do not have parent company guarantees.

 

Concentration of Risk

 

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and derivative contracts (interest rate swaps). The maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value at the balance sheet date. We do not have a policy of requiring collateral or security. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are placed with qualified financial institutions. Periodic evaluations are performed of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions. In addition, exposure is limited by diversifying among counterparties. There are three charterers so there is a concentration of risk related to trade receivables. Credit risk related to trade receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customer’s financial condition. No allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. While the maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value of trade receivables at the balance sheet date, should the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung or the Höegh Grace terminate prematurely, or Höegh LNG prematurely terminate the future time charter under the option exercised for the Höegh Gallant, or the option to acquire the PGN FSRU Lampung be exercised, there could be delays in obtaining new time charters and the hire rates could be lower depending upon the prevailing market conditions.

 

Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

165

 

 

PART II

 

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

 

As of December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with all applicable covenants under our debt agreements.

 

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Securities Holders and Use of Proceeds

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (“CEO and CFO”), we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of December 31, 2019. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that (i) information required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our system of controls is designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the reliability and integrity of accounting and financial reporting. Because of inherent limitations in any such control system (e.g. faulty judgments, human error, information technology system error, or intentional circumvention), there can be no assurance that the objectives of a control system will be met under all circumstances. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of a control system also must be considered relative to the costs of the system and our judgment regarding the likelihood of potential events. In addition, expectations related to any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as (defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation and presentation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

  i)

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions

and dispositions of our assets;

 

  ii)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial

statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures

are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

 

  iii)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or

disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the criteria described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, testing of the operating effectiveness of such controls and a conclusion on this evaluation.

 

Based on this evaluation, management believes that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

 

166

 

 

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by Ernst & Young AS, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page F-3 of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

Our board of directors has determined that Kathleen McAllister and David Spivak qualify as audit committee financial experts and are independent under applicable NYSE and SEC standards.

 

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted the Höegh LNG Partners LP Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. This document is available under the “Governance” section of our website (www.hoeghlngpartners.com). We intend to disclose, under this section of our website, any waivers to or amendments of the Höegh LNG Partners LP Corporate Code of Business Ethics and Conduct for the benefit of any of our directors and executive officers.

 

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Our principal accountant for 2019 was Ernst & Young AS.

 

The audit committee of our board of directors has the authority to pre-approve permissible audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by SEC and PCAOB standards to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees. Engagements for proposed services either may be separately pre-approved by the audit committee or entered into pursuant to detailed pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, as long as the audit committee is informed on a timely basis of any engagement entered into on that basis. The audit committee separately pre-approved all engagements and fees paid to our principal accountant in 2019.

 

Fees Incurred by the Partnership for Ernst & Young AS’ Services

 

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Audit Fees  $1,226   $930 
Total Fees  $1,226   $930 

 

Audit Fees

 

Audit fees for 2019 and 2018 are the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the Partnership’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the two most recent fiscal years.

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

There were no audit-related fees for 2019 and 2018. 

 

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 16F. Change in Registrants’ Certifying Accountant

 

Not applicable.

 

167

 

 

Item 16G. Corporate Governance

 

Overview

 

Pursuant to an exemption under the NYSE listing standards for foreign private issuers, the Partnership is not required to comply with the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. However, pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, we are required to state any significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the practices required by the NYSE for U.S. companies. We believe that our established practices in the area of corporate governance are in line with the spirit of the NYSE standards and provide adequate protection to our unitholders. The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards applicable to listed U.S. companies are set forth below.

 

Independence of Directors

 

The NYSE rules do not require a listed company that is a foreign private issuer to have a board of directors that is comprised of a majority of independent directors. Under Marshall Islands law, we are not required to have a board of directors comprised of a majority of directors meeting the independence standards described in the NYSE rules. In addition, the NYSE rules do not require limited partnerships like us to have boards of directors comprised of a majority of independent directors. However, our board of directors has determined that each of Ms. McAllister, Mr. Jamieson, Mr. Shaw and Mr. Spivak satisfies the independence standards established by the NYSE as applicable to us.

 

Executive Sessions

 

The NYSE requires that non-management directors of a listed U.S. company meet regularly in executive sessions without management. The NYSE also requires that all independent directors of a listed U.S. company meet in an executive session at least once a year. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our partnership agreement, our non-management directors do not regularly hold executive sessions without management, and we do not expect them to do so in the future.

 

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

 

The NYSE requires that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee of independent directors and a committee charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our partnership agreement, we do not currently have a nominating or corporate governance committee.

 

Compensation Committee

 

The NYSE requires that a listed U.S. company have a compensation committee of independent directors and a committee charter specifying the purpose, duties and evaluation procedures of the committee. As permitted under Marshall Islands law and our partnership agreement, we do not currently have a compensation committee.

  

Unitholder Approval

 

We are not required to obtain unitholder approval prior to the adoption of equity compensation plans or certain equity issuances, including, among others, issuing 20% or more of our outstanding common units or voting power in a transaction.

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

The NYSE requires U.S. companies to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. The guidelines must address, among other things: director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management and independent advisers, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession and an annual performance evaluation. We are not required to adopt such guidelines under Marshall Islands law, and we have not adopted such guidelines.

 

We make available a statement of significant differences on our website (www.hoeghlngpartners.com) in the governance section.

 

We believe that our established corporate governance practices satisfy the NYSE listing standards.

 

Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure

 

Not applicable.

 

168

 

 

PART III

 

Item 17. Financial Statements

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 18. Financial Statements

 

The consolidated financial statements of Höegh LNG Partners LP and schedule set forth on pages F-1 through F-69 and Exhibit 15.1, together with the related reports of Ernst & Young AS, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon, are filed as part of this Annual Report.

 

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required, are inapplicable or have been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements and therefore have been omitted.

 

Item 19. Exhibits

 

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
1.1 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Höegh LNG Partners LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
1.2 Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Höegh LNG Partners LP, dated October 5, 2017, between Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K, filed on October 5, 2017)
   
2.1* Description of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act
   
4.1 Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 8, 2014, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.2 Omnibus Agreement, dated August 12, 2014, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.2.1 Letter Agreement, dated August 12, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F/A, filed on November 30, 2015)
   
4.3 2014 Höegh LNG Partners LP Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.4 Höegh LNG Partners LP Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 10, 2019)
   
4.5 Employment Contract, dated June 9, 2010, between Steffen Føreid and Höegh LNG AS, as amended November 28, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 10, 2019)
   
4.6* Administrative Services Agreement, dated December 20, 2019, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Höegh LNG AS

 

169

 

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
4.7 Commercial and Administration Management Agreement, dated November 24, 2009, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Höegh LNG AS ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.8 Commercial and Administration Management Agreement, dated May 19, 2010, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Höegh LNG AS ( Cape Ann ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.9 Management Agreement, dated March 27, 2015, between Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited and Höegh LNG AS ( Höegh Gallant ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.10 Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 4 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on August 6, 2014)
   
4.11 Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated April 23, 2014, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( Cape Ann ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 4 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on August 6, 2014)
   
4.12 Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated March 24, 2015, between Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( Höegh Gallant ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.13 Baltic and International Maritime Council Standard Ship Management Agreement, dated October 17, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.14 Technical Information and Services Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG AS ( PGN FSRU Lampung ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.15 Master Spare Parts Supply Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG Asia Pte. Ltd. ( PGN FSRU Lampung ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.16 Master Maintenance Agreement, dated April 2, 2014, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and Höegh LNG Shipping Services Pte Ltd ( PGN FSRU Lampung ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.17 Sub-Technical Support Agreement, dated April 11, 2014, between Höegh LNG AS and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( PGN FSRU Lampung ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.18 Intercompany Agreement Regarding Secondment of Employees, dated March 31, 2015, between Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. and Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, as amended by Addendum No. 1 dated November 17, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)

 

170

 

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
4.19 Manning Agreement, dated September 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh Fleet Services Philippines Inc. ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.20 Management Consulting Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG AS ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.21 Agreement for the Provision of Professional Payment Services, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.22 Crew Recruitment Consulting Services Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.23 Spare Parts Procurement and Insurance Services Agreement, dated October 25, 2016, between Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.24 Technical Services Agreement, dated October 1, 2016, between Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Höegh LNG AS ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.25† SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated March 20, 2007, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Suez LNG Trading SA, as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., GDF Suez LNG Trading SA (formerly known as Suez LNG Trading SA) and GDF Suez Global LNG Supply SA ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.25.1† Amendment No 1. to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated February 23, 2015, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16.1 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.25.2† Amendment No 2. to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated February 23, 2015, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.16.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.25.3† Amendment No. 3, dated April 23, 2014, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on August 6, 2014)
   
4.25.4† Amendment No. 4, dated December 9, 2016, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty ( Neptune ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29.4 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.25.5* Deed of Novation and Amendment, dated December 20, 2019, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty ( Neptune ), among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., Global LNG SAS and Total Gas & Power Limited.
   
4.25.6*†† Amendment No. 5, dated April 1, 2020, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty (Neptune)
   
4.26† SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, dated March 20, 2007, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and Suez LNG Trading SA, as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd., Suez LNG Trading SA and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., as novated by the Novation Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., GDF Suez LNG Trading SA (formerly known as Suez LNG Trading SA) and GDF Suez Global LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated June 20, 2012, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as amended by Amendment No. 2, dated June 20, 2012, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA, as supplemented by the Side Letter, dated November 17, 2013, between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and GDF Suez LNG Supply SA ( Cape Ann ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)

 

171

 

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
4.26.1† Amendment No. 3, dated April 23, 2014, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty (Cape Ann ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on August 6, 2014)
   
4.26.2† Amendment No. 4, dated October 23, 2017, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty, as supplemented by the Side Letter, dated October 27, 2017 ( Cape Ann ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 6, 2018)
   
4.26.3* Deed of Novation and Amendment, dated December 20, 2019, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty (Cape Ann ), among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., Global LNG SAS and Total Gas & Power Limited
   
4.26.4*†† Amendment No. 5, dated February 20, 2020, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty (Cape Ann )
   
4.26.5*†† Amendment No. 6, dated April 1, 2020, to the SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty (Cape Ann)
   
4.27 Amendment and Restatement Agreement of the Original Lease, Operation and Maintenance Agreement, dated January 25, 2012, between Höegh LNG Ltd. and PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, as novated by the Novation Agreement for Amended & Restated Lease, Operation & Maintenance Agreement, dated September 18, 2013, among PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, Höegh LNG Ltd. and PT Höegh LNG Lampung, as novated by the Novation Agreement for Amended & Restated Lease, Operation & Maintenance Agreement, dated February 21, 2014, among PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk, PT PGN LNG Indonesia and PT Höegh LNG Lampung ( PGN FSRU Lampung ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.28† Lease and Maintenance Agreement, dated April 15, 2015, between Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, acting through its Egypt Branch, and Höegh LNG Egypt LLC ( Höegh Gallant ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.29† International Leasing Agreement, dated November 1, 2014, between Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P., as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated September 24, 2015 ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.30† FSRU Operation and Services Agreement, dated November 1, 2014, between Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P., as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated September 24, 2015, as novated by the Deed of Novation, dated October 18, 2016, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. and Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P. ( Höegh Grace ) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.31 Second Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Agreement, dated July 18, 2014, among Mitsui O.S.K Lines, Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.32 Shareholders’ Agreement, dated March 13, 2013, between Höegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd. and PT Bahtera Daya Utama (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.33 Novation Deed, dated August 31, 2010, among Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.34 Novation Deed, dated August 31, 2010, among Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Tokyo LNG Tanker Co., Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)

 

172

 

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
4.35 Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated October 9, 2013, among Höegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd., PT Bahtera Daya Utama and PT Imeco Inter Sarana (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 3, 2014)
   
4.36 Revolving Loan Agreement, dated August 12, 2014, between Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. in the amount of $85,000,000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.36.1 Amendment No. 1 to the Revolving Loan Agreement, dated February 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32.1 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.36.2 Amendment No. 2 to the Revolving Loan Agreement, dated January 29, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.40.2 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 6, 2018)
   
4.36.3* Amendment No. 3 to the Revolving Loan Agreement, dated May 28, 2019
   
4.37 Neptune Facility Agreement, dated December 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Amendment Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated August 26, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated July 25, 2014 and the Amendment Agreement, dated February 24, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.37.1 Amendment Letter, dated December 7, 2016, to Neptune Facility Agreement, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and DNB Bank ASA, as security trustee and agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41.1 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 6, 2017)
   
4.37.2* Amendment Letter, dated December 20, 2019, to Neptune Facility Agreement, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and DNB Bank ASA, as security trustee and agent
   
4.38 Cape Ann Facility Agreement, dated December, 20, 2007, among SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Amendment Agreement, dated March 25, 2010, the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated August 26, 2010, the Amendment Agreement, dated June 29, 2012 and the Letter from the Agent for the Lenders, dated July 25, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.38.1* Amendment Letter, dated December 20, 2019, to Cape Ann Facility Agreement, between SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and DNB Bank ASA, as security trustee and agent
   
4.39 $299 Million Lampung Facility Agreement, dated September 12, 2013, between PT Höegh LNG Lampung and the other parties thereto, as amended by the Second Side Letter, dated December 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.28 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 24, 2015)
   
4.40 $385 Million Senior Secured Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement dated January 29, 2019 among Höegh LNG Partners LP, as borrower, and the other parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.44 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 10, 2019)
   
4.41 License Agreement, between Leif Höegh & Co. Ltd. and Höegh LNG Partners LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 1 to the registrant’s Form F-1 Registration Statement (333-197228), filed on July 17, 2014)
   
4.42 Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 12, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.39 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)

 

173

 

 

Exhibit  
Number Description
   
4.43 Letter Agreement, dated October 1, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Egypt LLC, Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.40 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.44 Option Agreement, dated October 1, 2015, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd. and Höegh LNG Partners LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.41 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on April 28, 2016)
   
4.45 Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 1, 2016, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K, filed on December 1, 2016)
   
4.46 Contribution, Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 16, 2017, among Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners LP and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K, filed on January 26, 2018)
   
4.47 Indemnification Agreement, dated September 27, 2017, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K, filed on September 28, 2017)
   
4.48 At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement, dated October 18, 2019, among Höegh LNG Partners LP, Höegh LNG GP LLC and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and B. Riley FBR, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K, filed on October 18, 2019)
   
8.1* Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG Partners LP
   
12.1* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer
   
13.1* Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer
   
15.1* Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
   
15.2* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
   
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Calculation Linkbase
   
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Definition Linkbase
   
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Label Linkbase
   
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Presentation Linkbase

 

* Filed herewith.
   
Certain portions have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment order. Omitted information has been filed separately with the SEC.
††

Certain identified information has been excluded from the exhibit because it is both (i) not material and (ii)

would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.

 

174

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.

 

  HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP
       
Date: April 3, 2020      
       
  By: /s/ Steffen Føreid
    Name: Steffen Føreid
    Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

175

 

 

INDEX TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP    
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements    
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017   F-4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017   F-5
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018   F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017   F-8
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017   F-9
Notes to the consolidated financial statements   F-11
Exhibit 15.1 Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant    

 

F-1

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  

To the Unitholders and the Board of Directors of Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, the related notes and financial statement Schedule I in Exhibit 15.1 of Item 19 (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Partnership at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated April 3, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young AS

We have served as the Partnership’s auditor since 2013.

Oslo, Norway

April 3, 2020

 

 F-2 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Unitholders and the Board of Directors of Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

We have audited Höegh LNG Partners LP’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Höegh LNG Partners LP (the Partnership) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Partnership as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in partners’ capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, the related notes and financial statement Schedule I in Exhibit 15.1 of Item 19 (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) and our report dated April 3, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

The Partnership’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Partnership in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

 

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young AS

Oslo, Norway

April 3, 2020

 

 F-3 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 2018 AND 2017

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per unit amounts)

 

   Notes   2019   2018   2017 
REVENUES                    
Time charter revenues   4,5,15,18   $145,321    144,952   $143,531 
Other revenue   4,5    115    1,609     
Total revenues   4,5    145,436    146,561    143,531 
OPERATING EXPENSES                    
Vessel operating expenses   14,15    (30,870)   (24,195)   (23,791)
Construction contract expenses   18            (151)
Administrative expenses        (9,861)   (8,916)   (9,910)
Depreciation and amortization   11,12    (21,477)   (21,146)   (21,054)
Total operating expenses        (62,208)   (54,257)   (54,906)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures   4,9    6,078    17,938    5,139 
Operating income (loss)   4    89,306    110,242    93,764 
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE), NET                    
Interest income   15    947    725    500 
Interest expense   13,15    (27,692)   (26,814)   (30,085)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   6    1,030         
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments   17        4,681    2,463 
Other items, net        (3,575)   (2,907)   (3,574)
Total financial income (expense), net   6    (29,290)   (24,315)   (30,696)
Income (loss) before tax        60,016    85,927    63,068 
Income tax benefit (expense)   7    (7,275)   (8,305)   (3,878)
Net income (loss)   4   $52,741    77,622   $59,190 
Non-controlling interest in net income                10,408 
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income        13,850    12,303    2,480 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)       $38,891    65,319   $46,302 
                     
Earnings per unit                    
Common unit public (basic and diluted)   22   $1.12    1.93   $1.37 
Common unit Höegh LNG (basic and diluted)   22   $1.84    2.03   $1.44 
Subordinated unit Höegh LNG (basic and diluted)   22   $0.70    2.03   $1.45 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-4 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 2018 AND 2017

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   Notes   2019   2018   2017 
Net income (loss)       $52,741    77,622   $59,190 
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge   17    (12,217)   (2,290)   3,335 
Income tax benefit (expense)   7,17    (389)   (299)   (347)
Other comprehensive income (loss)        (12,606)   (2,589)   2,988 
Comprehensive income (loss)       $40,135    75,033   $62,178 
Non-controlling interest in comprehensive income                10,794 
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income        13,850    12,303    2,480 
Partners' interest in comprehensive income (loss)       $26,285    62,730   $48,904 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-5 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   Notes   2019   2018 
ASSETS               
Current assets               
Cash and cash equivalents   16   $39,126   $26,326 
Restricted cash   16    8,066    6,003 
Trade receivables   5,16    735    1,228 
Amounts due from affiliates   5,15,16    4,296    4,328 
Inventory        463    646 
Current portion of net investment in financing lease   5    4,551    4,168 
Derivative instruments   16,17        1,199 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables        2,534    2,967 
Total current assets        59,771    46,865 
Long-term assets               
Restricted cash   16    12,627    13,125 
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures   4,9    3,270     
Advances to joint ventures   10,16    3,831    3,536 
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation   11    640,431    658,311 
Other equipment   11    256    445 
Intangibles and goodwill   12    17,108    20,739 
Net investment in financing lease   5    274,353    278,905 
Long-term deferred tax asset   7    217    174 
Other long-term assets       936    940 
Total long-term assets        953,029    976,175 
Total assets       $1,012,800   $1,023,040 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-6 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND 2018

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   Notes   2019   2018 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY               
Current liabilities               
Current portion of long-term debt   13,16   $44,660   $45,458 
Trade payables        533    529 
Amounts due to owners and affiliates   15,16    2,513    2,301 
Value added and withholding tax liability        1,476    1,175 
Derivative instruments   16,17    2,907    259 
Accrued liabilities and other payables   14    11,164    7,458 
Total current liabilities        63,253    57,180 
Long-term liabilities               
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   4,9        2,808 
Long-term debt   13,16    412,301    390,087 
Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates   15,16    8,792    39,292 
Derivative instruments   16,17    12,028    2,438 
Long-term tax liability   7    2,283    1,725 
Long-term deferred tax liability   7    12,549    8,974 
Other long-term liabilities        84    99 
Total long-term liabilities        448,037    445,423 
Total liabilities        511,290    502,603 
EQUITY   20,21,22           
8.75% Series A preferred units:
6,625,590 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and
6,129,070 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018
        164,482    151,259 
Common units public:
18,028,786 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and
17,944,701 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018
        315,176    325,250 
Common units Höegh LNG:
15,257,498 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and
2,101,438 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018
        39,795    6,844 
Subordinated units:
Zero units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and
13,156,060 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018
            42,421 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   17    (17,943)   (5,337)
Total partners' capital        501,510    520,437 
Total equity        501,510    520,437 
Total liabilities and equity       $1,012,800   $1,023,040 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-7 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 2018 AND 2017

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   Partners' Capital         
   8.75%
Series A
Preferred
Units
   Common
Units
Public
   Common
Units
Höegh
LNG
   Subordinated
Units
   Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
   Non-controlling
interest
   Total
Equity
 
Consolidated balance as of December 31, 2016  $    321,091    6,849    42,586    (5,736)      $364,790 
Non-controlling interest acquired from the purchase of the Höegh Grace entities                       88,561    88,561 
Net income   2,480    24,217    3,055    19,030        10,408    59,190 
Cash distributions to unitholders       (30,039)   (3,741)   (23,257)           (57,037)
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest                       (9,457)   (9,457)
Cash contribution from Höegh LNG           315    1,760            2,075 
Refund of indemnification received from Höegh LNG           (213)   (1,321)           (1,534)
Other comprehensive income                   2,602    386    2,988 
Net proceeds from public offering and issuance of Series A preferred units   110,924                        110,924 
Acquisition of non-controlling interest from the purchase of the Höegh Grace entities                       (89,898)   (89,898)
Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid       1,528    183    1,139    386        3,236 
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees       189                    189 
Contributions from owners       163    65    404            632 
Consolidated balance as of December 31, 2017  $113,404    317,149    6,513    40,341    (2,748)      $474,659 
Net income   12,303    34,409    4,257    26,653            77,622 
Cash distributions to unitholders   (13,107)   (31,211)   (3,881)   (24,298)           (72,497)
Refund of indemnification received from Höegh LNG           (325)   (2,028)           (2,353)
Cash distributions from Höegh LNG           234    1,467            1,701 
Other comprehensive income                   (2,589)       (2,589)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units       4,563                    4,563 
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units   38,659                        38,659 
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees       200                    200 
Other and contributions from owners       140    46    286            472 
Consolidated balance as of December 31, 2018  $151,259    325,250    6,844    42,421    (5,337)      $520,437 
Net income   13,850    20,186    12,973    5,732            52,741 
Cash distributions to unitholders   (13,692)   (31,663)   (10,051)   (18,398)           (73,804)
Refund of indemnification received from Höegh LNG           (9)   (55)           (64)
Conversion of subordinated units to common units           29,837    (29,837)            
Other comprehensive income                   (12,606)       (12,606)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units       1,029                    1,029 
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units   13,065                        13,065 
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees       194                    194 
Other and contributions from owners       180    201    137            518 
Consolidated balance as of December 31, 2019  $164,482    315,176    39,795        (17,943)      $501,510 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-8 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 2018 AND 2017

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   2019   2018   2017 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES               
Net income (loss)  $52,741    77,622   $59,190 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:               
Depreciation and amortization   21,477    21,146    21,054 
Equity in (earnings) losses of joint ventures   (6,078)   (17,938)   (5,139)
Changes in accrued interest income on advances to joint ventures   (295)   (273)   3,955 
Amortization of deferred debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed   2,361    700    828 
Amortization in revenue for above market contract   3,631    3,631    3,631 
Expenditure for drydocking   (3,107)        
(Gain) loss on debt extinguishment   (1,030)        
Changes in accrued interest expense   2,246    (605)   218 
Receipts from repayment of principal on financing lease   4,168         
Unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains)   360    181    908 
Gain (loss) on the settlement of the derivatives   (199)        
Proceeds from settlement of derivative instruments   1,398         
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments   21    (4,681)   (2,463)
Non-cash revenue: tax paid directly by charterer   (867)   (852)   (861)
Non-cash income tax expense: tax paid directly by charterer   867    852    861 
Deferred tax expense and provision for tax uncertainty   3,707    5,272    1,614 
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees   194    200    189 
Other adjustments   512    472    632 
Changes in working capital:               
Trade receivables   543    6,344    (1,035)
Inventory   183    22    29 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables   (2,081)   (72)   188 
Trade payables   (10)   155    (804)
Amounts due to owners and affiliates   244    842    (628)
Value added and withholding tax liability   2,827    4,257    4,519 
Accrued liabilities and other payables   1,439    (5,594)   (6,939)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   85,252    91,681    79,947 
                
INVESTING ACTIVITIES               
Expenditure for purchase of Höegh Grace entities           (137,475)
Cash acquired in the purchase of the Höegh Grace entities           3,793 
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash designated for purchase of the Höegh Grace entities           91,768 
Expenditure for vessel and other equipment   (269)   (747)   (21)
Receipts from repayment of principal on financing lease       3,814    3,485 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  $(269)   3,067   $(38,450)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-9 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019, 2018 AND 2017

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

   2019   2018   2017 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES               
Proceeds from long term debt  $368,300       $ 
Proceeds from revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates   3,500    5,400    25,730 
Repayment of long-term debt   (342,416)   (45,458)   (45,458)
Payment of debt issuance costs   (5,797)        
Repayment of revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates   (34,000)   (17,500)   (58,705)
Repayment of customer loan for funding of value added liability on import   (438)   (4,993)   (5,878)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units   1,029    4,563     
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units   13,065    38,659    110,924 
Cash distributions to limited partners and preferred unitholders   (73,804)   (72,497)   (57,037)
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest           (9,457)
Proceeds from indemnifications received from Höegh LNG       1,701    2,075 
Repayment of indemnifications received from Höegh LNG   (64)   (2,353)   (1,534)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  $(70,625)   (92,478)  $(39,340)
                
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   14,358    2,270    2,157 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   7    (97)    
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period   45,454    43,281    41,124 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period  $59,819    45,454   $43,281 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

 

   2019   2018   2017   2016 
Cash and cash equivalents  $39,126    26,326    22,679   $18,915 
Restricted cash - current asset   8,066    6,003    6,962    8,055 
Restricted cash - non-current asset   12,627    13,125    13,640    14,154 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash shown in the statement of cash flows       $59,819    45,454    43,281   $41,124 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 F-10 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

1. Description of business

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) was formed under the laws of the Marshall Islands on April 28, 2014 as an indirect 100% owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. (“Höegh LNG”) for the purpose of acquiring Höegh LNG’s interests in Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd., PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung), SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (the owner of the Neptune), and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (the owner of the Cape Ann) in connection with the Partnership’s initial public offering of its common units (the “IPO”) in August 2014.

 

On August 12, 2014, the Partnership completed its IPO. Prior to the closing of the IPO, Höegh LNG contributed to the Partnership all of its equity interests and loans and promissory notes due to it and affiliates in each of the entities owning the Neptune, the Cape Ann and the PGN FSRU Lampung. The transfer of the interests was recorded at Höegh LNG’s consolidated book values. At the closing of the IPO (including the exercise by the underwriters of the option to purchase an additional 1,440,000 common units), (i) 11,040,000 common units were sold to the public for net proceeds, after deduction of offering expenses, of $203.5 million; (ii) Höegh LNG owned 2,116,060 common units and 13,156,060 subordinated units, representing approximately 58% of the limited partner interests in the Partnership, and 100% of the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) and (iii) a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG owned the non-economic general partner interest in the Partnership.

 

Under the partnership agreement, the general partner has irrevocably delegated to the Partnership’s board of directors the power to oversee and direct the operations of, manage and determine the strategies and policies of the Partnership. Four of the seven board members were elected by the common unitholders at the Partnership’s first annual meeting of unitholders held on September 24, 2014. As a result, Höegh LNG, as the owner of the general partner, does not have the power to control the Partnership’s board of directors or the Partnership, and the Partnership is not considered to be under the control of Höegh LNG for United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) purposes. Therefore, the sale of a business from Höegh LNG to the Partnership is a change of control. As a result, the Partnership accounts for acquisitions of businesses under the purchase method of accounting and not as transfers of entities under common control.

 

On October 1, 2015, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 100% of the shares in Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd., the entity that indirectly owned the floating storage and regasification unit ("FSRU") the Höegh Gallant (the "Höegh Gallant entities"). The Höegh Gallant was constructed by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (“HHI”) and was delivered to Höegh LNG in November 2014.

 

In December 2016, the Partnership issued and sold 6,588,389 common units in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds of $111.5 million primarily to fund the purchase price of the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., the owner of the entities that own and operate the FSRU Höegh Grace (the "Höegh Grace entities"), in January 2017. Refer to note 3.

 

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding Ltd. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership entered an agreement with Höegh LNG, under which Höegh LNG granted to the Partnership the authority to make decisions about operations of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. from January 1, 2017 to the closing date of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership has recorded the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities in its consolidated statement of income from January 1, 2017. Refer to note 3.

 

On October 5, 2017, the Partnership issued 4,600,000 8.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units (the “Series A preferred units”) for proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and expenses, of $110.9 million. Refer to note 20. A portion of the net proceeds was used to repay outstanding debt under the seller's credit note related to the Höegh Gallant acquisition and outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility.

 

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities with a combination of cash remaining from the net proceeds from the issuance of Series A preferred units and draws on the revolving credit facility. Refer to note 3.

 

 F-11 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

On January 26, 2018, the Partnership entered into sales agreement with B. Riley FBR Inc. (the “Agent”). Under the terms of the sales agreement, the Partnership could offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and Series A preferred units through the Agent, acting as agent for the Partnership (the “Prior ATM Program”).

 

On October 18, 2019, the Partnership entered into a sales agreement with the Agent for a new ATM program and terminated the Prior ATM Program. Under the terms of the new sales agreement, the Partnership may offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and Series A preferred units, from time to time, through the Agent, acting as an agent for the Partnership. Sales of such units may be made in negotiated transactions that are deemed to be "at the market" offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or through a market maker other than on an exchange.

 

The interests in SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., collectively, are referred to as the “joint ventures” and the remaining entities owned by the Partnership, as reflected in the table below are, collectively, referred to as the “subsidiaries” in these consolidated financial statements. The PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace, the Neptune and the Cape Ann are FSRUs and, collectively, referred to in these consolidated financial statements as the vessels or the “FSRUs.” The Tower Yoke Mooring System (the “Mooring”) is an offshore installation that is used to moor the PGN FSRU Lampung to offload the gas into an offshore pipe that transports the gas to a land terminal. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, the owner of the Höegh Gallant, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., the owner of the Höegh Grace, and the two joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., are collectively referred to as the “FSRU-owning entities.”

 

The Neptune and the Cape Ann operate under long-term time charters with expiration dates in 2029 and 2030, respectively, and, in each case, with an option for the charterer, Global LNG Supply SA, as novated to Total Gas & Power Ltd. in February 2020, both subsidiaries of Total S.A. (“Total”), to extend for up to one additional period of ten years or two additional periods of five years each. The PGN FSRU Lampung, operates under a long term time charter which started in July 2014 with an expiration date in 2034, with an option for the charterer to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each, and uses the Mooring that was constructed, installed and sold to the charterer, PT PGN LNG Indonesia (“PGN LNG”), a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk (“PGN”), a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, a government-controlled, Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company. The Höegh Gallant operates under a long term time charter which started in April 2015 with an expiration date in April 2020 with Hoegh LNG Egypt LLC (“EgyptCo”), a subsidiary of Höegh LNG. EgyptCo had a charter with the government-owned Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company (“EGAS”) until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership exercised, on February 27, 2020, its right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. The Höegh Grace operates under a long term time charter which started in December 2016 with Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P. ("SPEC"). SPEC is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. The non-cancellable charter period of 10 years ends in December 2026. The initial term of the charter is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if SPEC waives its rights to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, the Partnership will not be able to exercise its right to terminate in year 10.

 

 F-12 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The following table lists the entities included in these consolidated financial statements and their purpose as of December 31, 2019.

 

   Jurisdiction of   
   Incorporation   
Name  or Registration  Purpose
Höegh LNG Partners LP  Marshall Islands  Holding Company
Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (100% owned) (4)  Marshall Islands  Holding Company
Hoegh LNG Services Ltd (100% owned)  United Kingdom  Administration Services Company
Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. (100% owned)  Singapore  Owns 49% of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung
PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (49% owned) (1)  Indonesia  Owns PGN FSRU Lampung
SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (50% owned) (2)  Cayman Islands  Owns Neptune
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (50% owned) (2)  Cayman Islands  Owns Cape Ann
Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. (100% owned) (4)  Cayman Islands  Holding Company
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited (100% owned)  Cyprus  Owns Höegh Gallant
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch (100% owned)  Egypt  Branch of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited
Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. (100% owned) (3)  Cayman Islands  Owns 100% of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.
Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. (100% indirectly owned) (3)  Cayman Islands  Owns Höegh Grace
Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. (100% indirectly owned) (3)  Colombia  Operating Company

  

(1) PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a variable interest entity, which is controlled by Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. and is, therefore, 100% consolidated in the consolidated financial statements.

(2) The remaining 50% interest in each joint venture is owned by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co.

(3) The 51% of the ownership interests were acquired on January 3, 2017, and the remaining 49% of the ownership interests were acquired on December 1, 2017.

(4) On January 31, 2019, Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. transferred its ownership in Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited to Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. On February 14, 2020, the Certificate of Dissolution was received, certifying that Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. will be dissolved on May 4, 2020.

 

 F-13 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

2. Significant accounting policies

 

Basis of presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.

 

It has been determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. are variable interest entities. A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is defined by US GAAP as a legal entity where either (a) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights, or (b) the equity holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity's residual risks and rewards. The guidance requires a VIE to be consolidated if any of its interest holders are entitled to a majority of the entity's residual returns or are exposed to a majority of its expected losses.

 

Based upon the criteria set forth in US GAAP, the Partnership has determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a VIE, as the equity holders, through their equity investments, may not participate fully in the entity's expected residual returns and substantially all of the entity's activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, the Partnership. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung are included in the consolidated financial statements. Dividends may only be paid if the retained earnings are positive and a statutory reserve has been established equal to 20% of its paid up capital under Indonesian law. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung had not established the required statutory reserves as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Therefore, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung cannot make dividend payments under Indonesian law. Under the Lampung facility, there are limitations on cash dividends and loans that can be made to the Partnership. Refer to note 13. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $169.8 million and $164.4 million, respectively.

 

The Partnership has determined that Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited is a VIE, as the equity investment does not provide sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without financial guarantees. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited are included in the consolidated financial statements. Under Cyprus law, dividends may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

 

The Partnership has also determined that Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. is a VIE since the entity would not be able to finance its activities without financial guarantees under its subsidiary’s facility to finance Höegh Grace. As of January 1, 2017, the Partnership became the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives the majority of the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and subsidiaries, are included in the consolidated financial statements with a non-controlling interest reflected for the minority share until December 1, 2017. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Under Cayman Islands law, dividends may only be paid out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distributions. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

 

Dividends and other distributions from Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. may only be distributed if after the dividend payment, the Partnership would remain in compliance with the financial covenants under the $385 million facility. Refer to note 13.

 

 F-14 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

In addition, the Partnership has determined that the two joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., are VIEs since each entity did not have a sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The entities have been financed with third party debt and subordinated shareholders loans. The Partnership is not the primary beneficiary, as the Partnership cannot make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIEs, but has joint control with the other equity holders. Therefore, the joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Partnership has significant influence. The Partnership's carrying value is recorded in advances to joint ventures and accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheets. For SRV Joint Gas Ltd., the Partnership had a receivable for the advances of $3.0 million and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $2.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership's accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2018. The Partnership's carrying value for SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. consists of a receivable for the advances of $0.8 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership's accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $2.0 million as of December 31, 2018. The major reasons that the Partnership had low accumulated earnings in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2019 and accumulated losses in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2018 was due to the fair value adjustments for the interest rate swaps recorded as liabilities on the balance sheets of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and eliminations for consolidation to the balance sheet. The maximum exposure to loss is the carrying value of the receivables, which is subordinated to the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, the investments in the joint ventures (accumulated earnings or losses), as the shares are pledged as security for the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, and Höegh LNG’s commitment under long-term bank loan agreements to fund its share of drydocking costs and remarketing efforts in the event of an early termination of the charters. If the charters terminate for any reason that does not result in a termination fee, the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt would be subject to mandatory repayment. Dividend distributions require a) agreement of the other joint venture owners; b) fulfilment of requirements of the long-term bank loans; c) and under Cayman Islands law may be paid out of profits or capital reserves subject to the joint venture being solvent after the distribution.

 

Significant accounting policies

 

Foreign currencies

 

The reporting currency in the consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of the FSRU-owning entities. Nearly all revenues are received in U.S. dollars and a majority of the Partnership's expenditures for investments and all of the long-term debt are denominated in U.S. dollars. Transactions denominated in other currencies during the year are converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Resulting gains or losses are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

 

Business combinations and asset acquisitions

 

Business combinations are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under this method, the purchase price is allocated to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair values of net assets is recognized as goodwill. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. The results of entity acquired are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

 

Dependent upon facts and circumstances, the assessment of a transaction may be considered the acquisition of an asset, when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, rather than a business combination. Asset acquisitions are accounted for by allocating the cost of the acquisition to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. Acquisition related costs are capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets acquired.

 

 F-15 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Time charter revenue, related contract balances and related expenses

 

Time charter revenues and related contract balances:

 

The Partnership is required to evaluate whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as a single contract, whether the contract promises to deliver more than one distinct good or service, or performance obligations, and/or a lease, determine the transaction price under the contract, allocate the transaction price to the lease and the performance obligations and recognize revenue as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Partnership believes the nature of its time charter contracts are the same, regardless of whether the contracts are accounted for as financing leases or operating leases for accounting purposes. As such, when adopting the revised guidance on leases as of January 1, 2019, the Partnership did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and services components for operating leases because this would result in inconsistent disclosure for the time charter contracts.

 

Performance obligations:

 

The Partnership determined that its time charter contracts contain a lease and a performance obligation for the provision of time charter services. The lease of the vessel, representing the use of the vessel without any associated performance obligations or warranties, is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 842; Leases.

 

The provision of time charter services, including guarantees for the level of performance provided by the time charter contracts, is considered a distinct service and is accounted for in accordance with the provision of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Partnership determined that the nature of the time charter services promised, represents a single performance obligation, to stand ready over a 24-hour interval to accept LNG cargos, to transport cargos, to regasify the LNG and discharge the resulting gas into a pipeline in accordance with the charterer’s instructions and requirements.

 

Time charter services revenue can be recognized as the performance obligation is satisfied over the 24-hour interval to the performance standards specified under the time charter contract. If the performance standards are not met, off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other performance payments may result.

 

Contract terms, determination of transaction price and allocation to performance obligations:

 

The Partnership’s time charter contracts for all FSRUs, except the Höegh Gallant, include day rates or hire rates and warranty provisions with the following components:

  

  · Fixed element: The fixed element is a fixed per day fee intended to cover remuneration for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.
  · Operating expense reimbursement element: The operating expense reimbursement element is a rate per day intended to cover the operating costs of the vessel, including the crew, insurance, consumables, miscellaneous services, spares and maintenance and repairs costs and management services and fees. The amount of the operating expense reimbursement element may be based on actual cost incurred, or fees subject to indexing or other adjustments after a defined period, or a combination of both.
  · Tax reimbursement element: The tax reimbursement element may be a rate per day, based on the estimated liability for the year divided by the number of days in the year, subject to adjustment for actual taxes incurred, or a reimbursement of the costs as the taxes are incurred. The tax reimbursement element may cover withholding taxes, payroll taxes, other local taxes and current income tax expense for the jurisdiction in which the vessel operates as defined by the provisions of the individual time charter contract.
  · Performance warranties element: The performance warranties element includes defined operational capacity and standards that can result in the FSRUs being off-hire or require compensation to the charterer through provision of reduced hire, liquidated damages or performance payments. Examples of performance warranties include the ability to discharge regasified LNG at specified performance rates, guaranteed minimum fuel consumption, guaranteed minimum boil-off rates and the ability to accept cargos.

 

 F-16 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The Höegh Gallant has a single day rate intended to cover all of the elements listed above. In addition, the time charter contract for the Höegh Gallant includes a provision for 15 days of off-hire for scheduled maintenance. The joint ventures’ time charter contracts also provide for upfront payments for variable costs for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts.

 

The hire rates for the PGN FSRU Lampung and the joint ventures are invoiced at the beginning of the month. The Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace invoice time charter revenues monthly in arrears.

 

The transaction price is estimated as the standalone selling price for the lease and the time charter services components of the fixed day rate element. Variable consideration per day for operating expense and tax reimbursements is estimated at the most likely amount to which the Partnership is expected to be entitled to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty related to the variable consideration is resolved. When there is significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received, that variable consideration is considered constrained. Typically, variable reimbursements and performance warranties are known at the end of each 24-hour interval, or as subsequently reassessed at the end of the reporting period. However, to the extent interpretations of contractual provisions are complex and/or disputed with the customer, this could give rise to constrained variable consideration. Constrained variable consideration is not estimated.

 

Variable consideration is allocated entirely to one performance obligation when the variable day rate relates specifically to the efforts to satisfy the single performance obligation. The default method of the relative standalone selling price method was used to allocate the remaining transaction price, principally the fixed element, between the lease and the time charter services. The total estimated transaction price for time charter services is considered variable consideration because it may be reduced by performance warranties.

 

The Partnership has made a policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a government entity on revenues and collected on behalf of that government entity from customers, such as sales or value added taxes.

 

Lease revenue recognition:

 

Leases are classified based upon defined criteria either as sale-type/direct financing leases (“financing leases”) or operating leases. A lease that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks of the FSRU to the charterer is accounted for as a financing lease by the lessor. All other leases that do not meet the criteria are classified as operating leases. On January 1, 2019, when adopting the revised leasing guidance, the Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and did not reassess conclusions under the previous standard about whether any existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. Accordingly, outstanding leases on January 1, 2019, continue to be classified in accordance with the prior lease guidance.

 

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as operating leases is recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the charter. The Höegh Gallant’s time charter, which had a five-year lease term at inception, is accounted for as an operating lease. The Höegh Grace's time charter contracts, which have a non-cancellable charter period of ten years, are accounted for as an operating lease. Under one of the time charter contracts, the contract provides for additional variable payments, including a finance component, over the initial term depending upon the actual commencement date of the contract within a defined window of potential commencement dates. The variable payments are considered directly related to the lease performance obligation. The revenue, excluding the financing component, is recognized over the initial 10-year term. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for final income tax directly related to the provision of the lease is recorded as a component of lease revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as financing leases is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. Origination costs related to the time charter are a component of the net investment in financing lease and amortized over the lease term using the effective interest method. Financing leases are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investments in financing leases. The PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, which had a 20-year lease term at inception, meets the criteria of transferring substantially all of the benefits and risks to the charterer and is accounted for as a financing lease.

 

 F-17 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Time charter services revenue recognition:

 

Variable consideration for the time charter services performance obligation, including amounts allocated to time charter services, estimated reimbursements for vessel operating expenses and estimated reimbursements of certain types of costs and taxes, are recognized as revenues as the performance obligation for the 24-hour interval is fulfilled, subject to adjustment for off-hire and performance warranties. Constrained variable consideration is recognized as revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis when the significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received is resolved. Estimates for variable consideration, including constrained variable consideration, are reassessed at the end of each period. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes directly related to the provision of the time charter services are recorded as a component of time charter service revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

Joint venture FSRUs lease and time charter services revenue recognition:

 

The Partnership’s interest in the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income is included in the consolidated financial statements under the equity method of accounting, however, the Joint venture FSRUs’ results are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note (note 4) and the time charter revenue note (note 5). The Neptune's and the Cape Ann’s time charters, which had a twenty-year lease term at inception, are accounted for as operating leases. The joint ventures’ time charters include provisions for the charterer to make upfront payments to compensate for variable cost for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts. The expenditures are considered costs required to fulfill the lease component of the contract. Payments for modifications are deferred and amortized over the shorter of the remaining charter period or the useful life of the additions. Payments for reimbursement of drydocking costs are deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the period to the next drydocking.

 

The accounting policy for time charter services for the joint ventures is the same as described above.  

 

Significant judgments in revenue recognition:

 

The Partnership does not provide stand-alone bareboat leases or time charter services for FSRUs. As a result, observable stand-alone transaction prices for the performance obligations are not available. The estimation of the transaction price for the lease and the time charter service performance obligation is complex, subject to a number of input factors, such as market conditions when the contract is entered into, internal return objectives and pricing policies, and requires substantial judgment. Significant changes in the transaction price between the two performance obligations could impact conclusions on the accounting for leases as financing or operating leases. In addition, variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount that the Partnership expects to be entitled to. Variable consideration is reassessed at the end of the reporting period taking into account performance warranties. The time charter contracts include provisions for performance guarantees that can result in off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other payments for performance warranties. Measurement of some of the performance warranties can be complex and require properly calibrated equipment on the vessel, complex conversions and computations based on substantial judgment in the interpretation of the contractual provisions. Conclusions on compliance with performance warranties impact the amount of variable consideration recognized for time charter services.

 

Contract assets:

 

Revenue recognized in excess of the monthly invoiced amounts, or accrued revenue, is recorded as contract assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The contract assets are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other receivables.

 

Contract liabilities:

 

Advance payments in excess of revenue recognized, or prepayments, and deferred revenue is recorded as contract liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Contract assets and liabilities are reported in a net position for each customer contract or combined contracts at the end of each reporting period. Contract liabilities are classified as current or non-current based on the expected timing of recognition of the revenue. Current and non-current contract liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

  

 F-18 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Refund liabilities:

 

Amounts invoiced or paid by the customer that are expected to be refunded to the customer are recorded as refund liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Refund liabilities may include invoiced amounts for estimated reimbursable operating expenses or other costs and taxes that exceeded the actual costs incurred, or off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages, or other payments for performance warranties. Refund liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables.

 

Remaining performance obligations:

 

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of contracts with customers under the scope of ASC 606 for which work has not been performed excluding unexercised contract options to extend the term. The Partnership qualifies for and has elected to apply the exemption to disclose the aggregate amount of remaining transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of the reporting period as consideration for time charter services is variable and allocated entirely to wholly satisfied performance obligations.

 

Related expenses:

 

Voyage expenses include bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal tolls and agency fees. Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage and when a vessel is on hire under time charters are generally the responsibility of, and paid directly by the charterers, and not included in the statement of income. When the vessel is off-hire, voyage expenses, principally fuel, may also be incurred and are paid by the FSRU-owning entity.

 

Vessel operating expenses, reflected in expenses in the statement of income, include crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils, communication expenses and management fees. Vessel operating expenses also include bunker fuel expenses when the vessel is on hire and the expenses are not directly paid and owed by the charterers. When the vessel is on hire, vessel operating expenses are invoiced as time charter service fees to the charterer or are covered by time charter rates. When the vessel is off-hire, vessel operating expenses are not invoiced to the charterer.

 

Voyage expenses, if applicable, and vessel operating expenses are expensed when incurred.

 

Construction contract expenses

 

Construction contract expenses include direct costs on contracts, including project management, labor and materials, amounts payable to subcontractors and capitalized interest.

 

Loss contingencies, insurance and other claims

 

Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability and the estimated amount of loss. Such assessments involve complex judgments about future events and estimates and assumptions that are deemed reasonable by management. Accruals are reviewed quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of additional information such as the impact of negotiations, advice of legal counsel or settlements.

 

Insurance claims for property damage are recorded, net of any deductible amounts, for recoveries up to the amount of loss recognized when the claims to insurance carriers are probable of recovery. Claims for property damage in excess of the loss recognized and for loss of revenue during off-hire, whether from insurance providers or indemnification from Höegh LNG, are considered gain contingencies, which are recognized when the proceeds are received.

 

Indemnification proceeds from Höegh LNG that cover the Partnership’s costs are accounted for following the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 1.B and SAB Topic 5.T. SAB Topic 1.B provides that the separate financial statements of a subsidiary should reflect any costs of its operations which are incurred by the owner on its behalf. SAB Topic 5.T provides that costs should be reflected as an expense in the subsidiary's financial statements with a corresponding credit to contributed equity.

 

 F-19 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Income taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of income tax expense. The amount of non-cash income tax expense is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and the book bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

Benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not recognition criterion is met, a tax position is measured based on the cumulative amount that is more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions is recognized in income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash, banks deposits, time deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are recognized as cash and cash equivalents.

 

Restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition

 

Restricted cash includes balances deposited with a bank as required under debt facilities to settle withholding tax, other tax liabilities and other current obligations of the entity, and principal and interest payments as required by the debt facilities. Restricted cash is classified as long-term when the settlement is more than 12 months from the balance sheet date. Cash designated for acquisition in the consolidated statement of cash flows is classified as an investing activity.

 

Trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts

 

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable based on historical write-off experience and customer economic data. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management believes that the receivable will not be recovered.

 

Investments in accumulated earnings or losses of and advances to joint ventures

 

Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for the Partnership’s proportionate share of earnings or losses and dividend distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had an accumulated share of earnings and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as an asset on the line accumulated earnings of joint ventures. As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership had an accumulated share of losses and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as a liability on the line accumulated losses of joint ventures.

 

Advances to joint ventures represent loan receivables due from the joint ventures and are recorded at cost. Interest on the advances to joint ventures is recorded to interest income in the consolidated statements of income as incurred. The quarterly payments from joint ventures included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and repayment of principal. Interest is accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment at the end of the loans after the original principal was fully repaid. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016. Payments of interest, including accrued interest repaid at the end of the loans, are treated as return on investment and included as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Payments of principal are included as a component of net cash provided by investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

 F-20 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Investments in joint ventures are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value below its carrying value. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value and the resulting impairment is recorded in the consolidated statement of income.

 

Loan receivables are impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the full amount of the receivable will not be collected. The amount of the impairment is measured as the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate and the carrying amount. The resulting impairment amount is recognized in earnings.

 

Inventory

 

Inventory consists of bunker fuel maintained on the FSRUs, if it is owned by the FSRU-owning entity. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

 

Vessels

 

All costs incurred during the construction of newbuildings, including interest and supervision and technical costs, are capitalized. The cost of an acquired vessel is the fair value. Vessels are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a vessel’s estimated useful life, less an estimated residual value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life of 35 years for the FSRUs.

 

Modifications to the vessels, including the addition of new equipment, which improves or increases the operational efficiency, functionality or safety of the vessels, are capitalized. These expenditures are amortized over the estimated useful life of the modification.

 

Expenditures covering recurring routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

 

Drydocking expenditures are capitalized when incurred and amortized over the period until the next anticipated drydocking. For vessels that are newly built, the "built-in overhaul" method of accounting is applied. Under the built-in overhaul method, costs of the newbuilding are segregated into costs that should be depreciated over the useful life of the vessel and costs that require drydocking at periodic intervals. The drydocking component is amortized until the date of the first drydocking following the delivery, upon which the actual drydocking cost is capitalized and the process is repeated. Costs of drydocking incurred to meet regulatory requirements or improve the vessel’s operating efficiency, functionality or safety are generally capitalized. Costs incurred related to routine repairs and maintenance performed during drydocking are expensed.

 

Impairment of long-lived assets

 

Vessels are assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the recoverability of vessels is assessed by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the vessel’s net carrying value exceeds the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated over its remaining useful life, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. An impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the vessel.

 

 F-21 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Intangibles and goodwill

 

Intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date of a business combination. All intangible assets of the Partnership have a definite life. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized over their useful life. Intangible assets with a definite life are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.

 

In determining the useful lives of intangible assets, the expected use of the assets, the contractual provisions that limit the useful life and other economic factors are considered. The contract related intangibles and their useful lives as of the acquisition dates, are as follows:

 

   Useful life 
Intangible category  (Years) 
Above market time charter Höegh Gallant   3.4 
Option for time charter extension Höegh Gallant   5.3 
Above market time charter Höegh Grace   9.5 

 

The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Gallant is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis over the remaining term of the contract of approximately 3.4 years as of the acquisition date. The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Grace is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis calculated per day over the remaining non-cancellable charter term of approximately 9.5 years as of the acquisition date of the initial 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Höegh LNG and the Partnership have entered into an option agreement pursuant to which the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the existing charter until July 2025. The Partnership exercised the option on February 27, 2020 and intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant (the “Subsequent Charter”). The intangible for the option for time charter extension will be amortized on a straight line basis over the extension period starting at the beginning of the Subsequent Charter, subject to impairment testing for recoverability in the preceding periods.

 

Goodwill arises when an acquisition is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the consideration over the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

 

Derivative instruments

 

All derivative instruments are initially recorded at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and are subsequently remeasured to fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the derivative. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss is dependent on whether the contract is designated as a hedging instrument and qualifies for hedge accounting.

 

For derivative instruments that are not designated or that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in earnings. In order to designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, formal documentation of the relationship between the derivative and the hedged item is required. This documentation includes the strategy and risk management objective for undertaking the hedge and the method that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge.

 

Interest rate swaps are used for the management of interest rate risk exposure. The interest rate swaps have the effect of converting a portion of the outstanding debt from a floating to a fixed rate over the life of the transactions. As of January 1, 2019, the following accounting policies became effective for cash flow hedges of interest rate swaps.

 

 F-22 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

For interest rate swaps qualifying as cash flow hedges, the fair value of the portion of the derivative instruments included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness ("hedge effectiveness") and the initial fair value of the hedge component excluded from hedge effectiveness are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Subsequent changes in fair value for the portion of the derivative instruments included in hedge effectiveness are recorded in other comprehensive income. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings (interest expense is incurred for floating interest rate debt), those amounts are transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. The initial fair value component excluded from hedge effectiveness is amortized to earnings over the life of the hedging instrument. The amortization is recognized on the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Any difference in the change in fair value of the hedge components excluded from hedge effectiveness and the amount recognized in earnings is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

 

Prospective and retrospective hedge effectiveness is assessed on an ongoing basis. If a cash flow hedge is no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. If a cash flow hedge for an interest rate swap is terminated and the originally hedged item is still considered probable of occurring, the gains and losses initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income remain there until the hedged item impacts earnings, at which point they are amortized to earnings on a systematic and rational basis to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. If the hedged items are no longer considered probable of occurring, amounts recognized in total equity are immediately transferred to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. Cash flows from derivative instruments that are accounted for as cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items being hedged.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges were initially recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Any hedge ineffectiveness was recognized immediately in earnings, as were any gains and losses or amortization on the portion of the derivative instruments that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings, those amounts were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the gain (loss) on derivative instruments line in the consolidated statement of income.

 

Deferred debt issuance costs and fair value of debt assumed

 

Debt issuance costs, including arrangement fees and legal expenses, are deferred and presented as a direct deduction from the outstanding principal of the related debt in the consolidated balance sheet and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of debt issuance costs is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the deferred debt issuance costs is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

 

The discount or premium arising in a business combination for the difference in the fair value of the debt assumed compared to the outstanding principal is reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct adjustment to the outstanding principal of the related debt and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of fair value of the debt assumed is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the discount or premium is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

 

Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, purchase price allocation, the useful lives of vessels, drydocking, loss contingencies and the value of derivative instruments.

 

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

 

Leases: In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued revised guidance for leasing, Leases, that amends the accounting guidance on leases for both lessors and lessees. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard using the optional transition method to apply the new standard at the transition date of January 1, 2019 with no retrospective adjustments to prior periods. Consequently, the accounting and disclosures for the prior periods continue to be presented in accordance with the previous standard for leases. The Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and has not reassessed conclusions under the previous standard about whether any expired or existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. In addition, the election to use hindsight when determining lease term for modifications to existing leases at the transition date was applied. The Partnership adopted an accounting policy to apply the short-term lease expedient as a lessee for leases under 12-months. This includes classes of leases for office equipment, office premises and vehicles used for administrative purposes, as well as, short-term leases of equipment used for projects, drydocking or maintenance associated with the vessels.

 

 F-23 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The Partnership is the lessor for time charters for its FSRUs. There were no changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized and, therefore, no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessor accounting. Additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required and have been implemented for reporting periods beginning as of January 1, 2019, while prior periods are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous accounting standards. Refer to note 5 for the qualitative and quantitative disclosures provided. As of January 1, 2019, cash payments received for the principal portion of the financing lease are presented as an operating cash inflow rather than as an investing cash inflow as presented for prior periods in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

The Partnership does not have material lease assets. Adoption of the new standard resulted in recording at a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for operating leases of $0.15 million and $0.15 million, respectively, as of December 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessee accounting. As of December 31, 2019, the right-of-use asset and the lease liability for operating leases was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The right-of-use asset is included as a component of other equipment in the consolidated balance sheet. The current and long-term lease liabilities are included as components of accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

 

Derivatives and Hedging: In August 2017, the FASB issued revised guidance for Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Those amounts are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item when hedged item affects earnings. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard on a prospective basis which had no material impact for accounting for cash flow hedges for the Partnership's interest rate swaps. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings from initial application of the standard. However, certain amounts reclassified or recorded to earnings were reported as a component of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with the presentation in previous periods in the gain (loss) on the derivative instruments line in the consolidated statements of income. In addition, the new disclosure requirements were applied on a prospective basis in note 17.

 

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued revised guidance for Financial Instruments — Credit Losses:Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The revised guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This revised guidance is effective for the Partnership from January 1, 2020, with a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2017, FASB issued revised guidance for Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the test for Goodwill Impirment. The revised guidance simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The revised guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the Partnership will adopt the standard from January 1, 2020. The adoption of the standard will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. The recorded amount of the Partnership’s goodwill is $0.3 million as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 12.

 

In December 2019, FASB issued revised guidance for Income Taxes – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The revised guidance eliminates certain exceptions to the guidance related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in interim or annual periods for which public business entities have not yet issued financial statements. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this revised guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

 F-24 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

3. Business combinations

 

Höegh Grace

 

Acquisition of 51% ownership interest in Höegh Grace

 

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 51% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., the owner of the entities that own and operate Höegh Grace pursuant to a purchase, sale and contribution agreement that the Partnership entered into with Höegh LNG on December 1, 2016. The cash consideration was $91.8 million, excluding the working capital adjustment. The working capital adjustment was $0.4 million.

 

In December 2016, the Höegh Grace, commenced on the time charter contract with a lease element and a services element with SPEC. The Höegh Grace serves as an LNG import terminal in Cartagena, on the Atlantic coast of Colombia. The initial term of the lease is 20 years. However, the charterer has an unconditional option to cancel the lease after 10 and 15 years. As a result, the non-cancellable lease period is for 10 years.

 

Under terms of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd.’s memorandum and articles of association, the Partnership has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the Höegh Grace entities and, therefore, has control over the Höegh Grace entities through the Partnership’s ownership of the equity interest of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. As a result, the Partnership accounted for the acquisition of the 51% interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. as a business combination. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership entered an agreement with Höegh LNG, under which Höegh LNG granted to the Partnership the authority to make decisions over the operations of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. from January 1, 2017 to the closing date of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership recorded the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities in its consolidated income statement as of January 1, 2017.

 

The purchase price of the acquisition was allocated to the identifiable fair values allocated to each class of identifiable assets acquired.

 

Under the purchase method of accounting when control is obtained, the non-controlling interest is required to be measured at its fair value at the acquisition date. Management concluded that the pro-rata values of the controlling and non-controlling interests were the same. The fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the 49% interest of the non-controlling interest was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date with any remaining unallocated amount recognized as goodwill.

 

 F-25 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The following summarizes the fair values of assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)        
Consideration          
Use of proceeds from public offering (issuance of 6,588,389 common units to the public)  $91,768      
Working capital adjustment   407      
Total consideration       $92,175 
           
Assets acquired          
Cash and cash equivalents   3,774      
Restricted cash   19      
Trade receivables   4,446      
Prepaid expenses and other receivables   51      
Vessel   357,138      
Other equipment   30      
Intangibles: Above market time charter   11,760      
Other long term assets   830      
Total assets        378,048 
Liabilities assumed          
Trade payables   (193)     
Amounts due to owners and affiliates   (622)     
Accrued liabilities and other payables   (1,569)     
Total long term debt   (192,286)     
Derivative instruments   (2,642)     
Total liabilities assumed        (197,312) 
Total identifiable net assets        180,736 
Non-controlling interest in total identifiable net assets        88,561 
Acquired share in total identifiable net asset       $92,175 

 

One contract related intangible was identified. The Partnership recorded $11.8 million for the favorable time charter contract with SPEC. Refer to note 2 Significant accounting policies: Intangibles and goodwill for information on the useful life and timing of amortization of the intangibles and note 12 for additional information.

 

The premium arising in a business combination for the difference in the fair value of the debt assumed compared to the outstanding principal was reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct adjustment to the outstanding principal of the related debt and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of fair value of the debt assumed was included as a component of interest expense.

 

The fair value of assets acquired and the liabilities assumed approximated the total consideration, therefore, no residual amount has been recognized as goodwill for the acquisition.

 

All of the excess value associated with the business combination is associated with assets and liabilities of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., a Cayman Islands company, which is not subject to corporate income taxes. Therefore, there are no deferred tax assets or liabilities included in the purchase price allocation. As of the acquisition date, Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. had net deferred tax assets of less than $0.1 million which were fully offset by a valuation allowance.

 

 F-26 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Acquisition of remaining 49% ownership interest in Höegh Grace

 

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and, as of that date, the Partnership has a 100% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

The purchase price for the acquisition was $85.9 million, excluding the working capital adjustment, pursuant to the purchase, sale and contribution agreement. The working capital adjustment was $0.8 million. The purchase price was settled with cash of $45.3 million from the issuance of the Series A preferred units and the rest of the purchase price of $41.4 million was financed by draws on the revolving credit facility.

 

The acquisition of 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities in January 2017 was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The December 2017 acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities is a change in the Partnership's ownership and has been accounted for as an equity transaction for the acquisition of the 49% interest from the owner of the non-controlling interest. The carrying amount of the non-controlling interest is adjusted to reflect the change in ownership interest. Any difference between the fair value of the total consideration and the book value of the non-controlling interest was recognized as a capital contribution in equity attributable to the Partnership.

 

The following summarizes the acquisition of the non-controlling interest as of the acquisition date:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)            
Consideration            
Cash portion of purchase price   $ 45,300          
Revolving credit facility draw     40,600          
Revolving credit facility draw for working capital adjustment     762          
Total consideration           $ 86,662  
                 
49% Assets acquired             181,420  
49% Liabilities assumed             (91,522 )
Total identifiable net assets             89,898  
                 
Non-controlling interest acquired             89,898  
Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid             (3,236 )
Impact of acquisition of non-controlling interest on equity           $ 86,662  

 

Revenue and profit contributions

 

Total revenues of $51.8 million and net income of $23.6 million have been included in the Partnership's consolidated statement of income from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

 

 F-27 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

4. Segment information

 

There are two operating segments. The segment profit measure is Segment EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and impairment, and other financial items (gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other items, net). Segment EBITDA is reconciled to operating income and net income in the segment presentation below. The two segments are “Majority held FSRUs” and “Joint venture FSRUs.” In addition, unallocated corporate costs, interest income from advances to joint ventures and interest expense related to the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility, the $385 million facility, and the seller’s credit note, repaid in October 2017, are included in “Other.”

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Majority held FSRUs includes the financing lease related to the PGN FSRU Lampung and the operating leases related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

 

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Joint venture FSRUs include two 50% owned FSRUs, the Neptune and the Cape Ann, that operate under long term time charters with one charterer.

 

The accounting policies applied to the segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements, except that i) Joint venture FSRUs are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note and under equity accounting for the consolidated financial statements, ii) internal interest income and interest expense between the Partnership's subsidiaries that eliminate in consolidation are not included in the segment columns for the other financial income (expense), net line and iii) non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is subtracted in the segment note to reflect the Partnership’s interest in Segment EBITDA as the Partnership’s segment profit measure, Segment EBITDA. Under the proportional consolidation method, 50% of the Joint venture FSRUs’ revenues, expenses and assets are reflected in the segment note. Management monitors the results of operations of joint ventures under the proportional consolidation method and not the equity method of accounting. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership began consolidating its acquired 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Since the Partnership obtained control of the Höegh Grace entities on that date, it consolidated 100% of the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of the Höegh Grace entities and the interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity under US GAAP. Management monitored the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities based on the Partnership’s 51% interest in Segment EBITDA of such entities and, therefore, subtracted the non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to present Segment EBITDA. The adjustment to non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is reversed to reconcile to operating income and net income in the segment presentation. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

In time charters, the charterer, not the Partnership, controls the choice of locations or routes the FSRUs serve. Accordingly, the presentation of information by geographical region is not meaningful. The following tables include the results for the segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

 F-28 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

   Year ended December 31, 2019 
       Joint venture                    
   Majority   FSRUs       Total            
   held   (proportional       Segment         Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations      reporting 
Time charter revenues  $145,321    42,433        187,754    (42,433)  (1)  $145,321 
Other revenue   115            115        (1)   115 
Total revenues   145,436    42,433        187,869            145,436 
Operating expenses (2)   (34,266)   (9,044)   (6,465)   (49,775)   9,044   (1)   (40,731)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures                   6,078   (1)   6,078 
Segment EBITDA   111,170    33,389    (6,465)   138,094             
Depreciation, amortization and impairment   (21,477)   (10,030)       (31,507)   10,030   (1)   (21,477)
Operating income (loss)   89,693    23,359    (6,465)   106,587            89,306 
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   1,030            1,030        (1)   1,030 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments       (5,209)       (5,209)   5,209   (1)    
Other financial income (expense), net   (12,511)   (12,072)   (17,809)   (42,392)   12,072   (1)   (30,320)
Income (loss) before tax   78,212    6,078    (24,274)   60,016           60,016 
Income tax expense   (7,278)       3    (7,275)          (7,275)
Net income (loss)  $70,934    6,078    (24,271)   52,741          $52,741 
Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income                   13,850   (3)   13,850 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $70,934    6,078    (24,271)   52,741    (13,850)  (3)  $38,891 

 

(1) Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership's share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.
(2) The Partnership's Indonesian subsidiary was assessed a property tax and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was as a result of the issuance of a new regulation in 2019, defining FSRUs as subject to the existing Indonesian property tax law. The property tax and penalties were recorded as a component of vessel operating expenses.
(3) Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

 

   As of December 31, 2019 
       Joint venture                    
   Majority   FSRUs       Total            
   held   (proportional       Segment         Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations      reporting 
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation    $640,431    252,789        893,220    (252,789)  (1)  $640,431 
Net investment in financing lease   278,904            278,904           278,904 
Goodwill     251            251           251 
Advances to joint ventures             3,831    3,831           3,831 
Total assets   996,201    284,174    16,599    1,296,974    (284,174)  (1)   1,012,800 
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures           50    50    3,220   (1)   3,270 
Expenditures for vessels & equipment   211    195        406    (195)  (2)   211 
Expenditures for drydocking   3,107    913        4,020    (913)  (2)   3,107 
Impairment/retirement of equipment       (75)       (75)   75  (2)    
Principal repayment financing lease      4,168            4,168           4,168 
Amortization of above market contract  $3,631            3,631          $3,631 

 

(1) Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated earnings of joint ventures.
(2) Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 F-29 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

   Year ended December 31, 2018 
       Joint venture                    
   Majority   FSRUs       Total            
   held   (proportional       Segment         Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations      reporting 
Time charter revenues  $144,952    43,169        188,121    (43,169)  (1)  $144,952 
Other revenue   1,609            1,609        (1)   1,609 
Total revenues   146,561    43,169        189,730            146,561 
Operating expenses   (27,294)   (10,932)   (5,817)   (44,043)   10,932   (1)   (33,111)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures                   17,938   (1)   17,938 
Segment EBITDA   119,267    32,237    (5,817)   145,687              
Depreciation and amortization   (21,146)   (9,725)       (30,871)   9,725   (1)   (21,146)
Operating income (loss)   98,121    22,512    (5,817)   114,816            110,242 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments   4,681    8,496        13,177    (8,496)  (1)   4,681 
Other financial income (expense), net   (26,381)   (13,070)   (2,615)   (42,066)   13,070   (1)   (28,996)
Income (loss) before tax   76,421    17,938    (8,432)   85,927           85,927 
Income tax expense   (8,253)       (52)   (8,305)          (8,305)
Net income (loss)  $68,168    17,938    (8,484)   77,622          $77,622 
Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income                   12,303   (2)   12,303 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $68,168    17,938    (8,484)   77,622    (12,303)  (2)  $65,319 

 

(1) Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership's share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.
(2) Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

   As of December 31, 2018 
       Joint venture                    
   Majority   FSRUs       Total            
   held   (proportional       Segment         Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations      reporting 
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation    $658,311    261,614        919,925    (261,614)  (1)  $658,311 
Net investment in financing lease   283,073            283,073           283,073 
Goodwill     251            251           251 
Advances to joint ventures             3,536    3,536           3,536 
Total assets   1,007,202    286,283    15,838    1,309,323    (286,283)  (1)   1,023,040 
Accumulated losses of joint ventures           50    50    (2,858)  (1)   (2,808)
Expenditures for vessels & equipment   257    3,305        3,562    (3,305)  (2)   257 
Expenditures for drydocking       2,490        2,490    (2,490)  (2)    
Principal repayment financing lease      3,814            3,814           3,814 
Amortization of above market contract  $3,631            3,631          $3,631 

 

(1) Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated losses of joint ventures.

(2) Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 F-30 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

   Year ended December 31, 2017 
         Joint venture                        
    Majority    FSRUs         Total              
    held    (proportional         Segment           Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)   FSRUs    consolidation)    Other    reporting    Eliminations       reporting 
Time charter revenues  $143,531    42,165        185,696    (42,165)  (1)  $143,531 
Accrual historical boil-off claim       (11,850)       (11,850)   11,850   (1)(2)    
Total revenues   143,531    30,315        173,846            143,531 
Operating expenses   (27,612)   (8,628)   (6,089)   (42,329)   8,628   (1)   (33,701)
Construction contract expenses   (151)           (151)       (3)   (151)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures                   5,139   (1)   5,139 
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA   (19,210)           (19,210)   19,210   (4)    
Segment EBITDA   96,558    21,687    (6,089)   112,156              
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA   19,210            19,210    (19,210)  (4)    
Depreciation and amortization   (21,054)   (9,815)       (30,869)   9,815   (1)   (21,054)
Operating income (loss)   94,714    11,872    (6,089)   100,497            93,764 
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments   2,463    7,194        9,657    (7,194)  (1)   2,463 
Other financial income (expense), net   (29,656)   (13,927)   (3,503)   (47,086)   13,927   (1)   (33,159)
Income (loss) before tax   67,521    5,139    (9,592)   63,068           63,068 
Income tax benefit (expense)   (3,893)       15    (3,878)          (3,878)
Net income (loss)  $63,628    5,139    (9,577)   59,190          $59,190 
Non-controlling interest in net income   10,408            10,408            10,408 
Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income                   2,480   (5)   2,480 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)  $53,220    5,139    (9,577)   48,782    (2,480)  (5)  $46,302 

 

(1) Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional consolidation amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (loss) of joint ventures.
(2) For additional information, refer to note 18 under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.”
(3) The warranty work for the Mooring was completed in 2017 resulting in additional expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
(4) Eliminations reverse the adjustment to Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA included for Segment EBITDA and the adjustment to reverse the Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to reconcile to operating income and net income.
(5) Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the percentage of consolidated total revenues from the following customers accounted for over 10% of the Partnership's consolidated total revenues:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
PT PGN LNG Indonesia   33%   33%   33%
Höegh LNG Egypt LLC   31%   31%   31%
Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P.   36%   36%   36%

 

 F-31 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

5. Time charter revenues and related contract balances

 

The Partnership presents its revenue by segment, disaggregated by revenue recognized in accordance with accounting standards on leasing and on revenue from contracts with customers for time charter services. In addition, material elements where the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows differ from the monthly invoicing under time charter contracts are separately presented. Revenue recognized for the Majority held FSRUs includes the amortization of above market contract intangibles. Revenue recognized for Joint venture FSRUs include the amortization of deferred revenues related to the charterer's reimbursements for certain vessel modifications and drydocking costs. As a result, the timing of cash flows differs from monthly time charter invoicing.

 

The following tables summarize the disaggregated revenue of the Partnership by segment for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2019 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment      Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Lease revenues, excluding amortization (2)  $88,889    25,690        114,579    (25,690)  $88,889 
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization   60,063    14,095        74,158    (14,095)   60,063 
Amortization of above market contract intangibles   (3,631)           (3,631)       (3,631)
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock       2,648        2,648    (2,648)    
Other revenue (3)   115            115        115 
Total revenues (4)  $145,436    42,433        187,869    (42,433)  $145,436 

 

   Year ended December 31, 2018 
       Joint venture                 
   Majority   FSRUs       Total         
   held   (proportional       Segment      Consolidated 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  FSRUs   consolidation)   Other   reporting   Eliminations (1)   reporting 
Lease revenues, excluding amortization  $89,215    25,690        114,905    (25,690)  $89,215 
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization   59,368    15,078        74,446    (15,078)   59,368 
Amortization of above market contract intangibles   (3,631)           (3,631)       (3,631)
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock       2,401        2,401    (2,401)    
Other revenue (3)   1,609            1,609        1,609 
Total revenues (4)  $146,561    43,169        189,730    (43,169)  $146,561 

 

(1) Eliminations reverse the proportional amounts of revenue for Joint venture FSRUs to reflect the consolidated revenues included in the consolidated income statement. The Partnership's share of the Joint venture FSRUs revenues is included in Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures on the consolidated income statement.
(2) The financing lease revenues comprise about one-fourth of the total lease revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3) Other revenue consists of insurance proceeds received for prior period claims related to repairs under the Mooring warranty and for repairs for the Höegh Gallant. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the cost of the repairs related to the Mooring, subject to repayment to the extent recovered from insurance proceeds. Refer to notes 4 and 18.
(4) Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of total revenues and is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership did not present disaggregated time charter revenues. Refer to note 4 for the combined time charter revenues by segment for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

The Partnership’s risk and exposure related to uncertainty of revenues or cash flows related to its long-term time charter contracts primarily relate to the credit risk associated with the individual charterers. Payments are due under time charter contracts regardless of the demand for the charterers’ gas output or the utilization of the FSRU.

 

 F-32 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The consolidated trade receivables, contract assets, contract liabilities and refund liabilities included in the table below, exclude the balances for the Joint venture FSRUs. The Partnership’s share of net assets in the Joint venture FSRUs are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet using the equity method on the line accumulated losses in joint ventures.

 

The following table summarizes the allocation of consolidated receivables between lease and service components:

 

   As of December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Trade receivable for lease  $2,898   $2,898 
Trade receivable for time charter services   2,133    2,658 
Total trade receivable and amounts due from affiliates  $5,031   $5,556 

 

There were no impairment losses for lease or service receivables or contract assets for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

The following table summarizes the consolidated contract assets, contract liabilities and refund liabilities to customers, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

   Services related 
   Contract   Refund liability 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  asset   to charters 
Balance January 1, 2019  $   $(1,834)
Additions   279    (65)
Reduction for receivables recorded       89 
Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)        
Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years       497 
Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer       1,188 
Balance December 31, 2019   279    (125)
Netting of contract asset and contract liability        
Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2019  $279   $(125)

 

   Services related 
   Contract   Refund liability 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  asset   to charters 
Balance January 1, 2018  $303   $(6,187)
Additions       (1,747)
Reduction for receivables recorded   (303)    
Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)        
Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years       2,772 
Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer       3,328 
Balance December 31, 2018       (1,834)
Netting of contract asset and contract liability        
Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2018  $   $(1,834)

 

 F-33 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

  

Contract assets are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other receivables. Current and non-current contract liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables and other long-term liabilities, respectively. Refund liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of accrued liabilities and other payables.

 

Refund liabilities to charterers include invoiced revenue to be refunded to charterers for estimated reimbursable costs that exceeded the actual cost incurred and for non-compliance with performance warranties in the time charter contracts that result in reduction of hire, liquidated damages or other performance related payments.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the major changes in the refund liability to charterers related to the settlement of a 2018 performance claim of $1,101 and the recognition of $497 of revenue related to conclusion of an audit by a charterer related to 2018 reimbursable expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the major changes related to recognition of previously constrained revenue related to prior periods' performance obligations of $2,772 and repayment of $3,328 for the conclusion of an audit by a charterer at the end of 2017 and in the third quarter of 2018 for the amount the charterer would reimburse for certain 2014, 2015 and 2016 costs.

 

Minimum contractual future revenues:

 

As of December 31, 2019, the minimum contractual future revenues to be received under the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace during the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Service related   Lease related   Total 
2020  $24,880    71,100   $95,980 
2021   19,703    59,903    79,606 
2022   19,703    59,903    79,606 
2023   19,703    59,903    79,606 
2024   19,703    59,903    79,606 
Thereafter   116,386    346,369    462,755 
Total - undiscounted  $220,078    657,081   $877,159 
Operating lease       $223,644      
Financing lease        433,437      
Discounting effect        (193,437)     
Financing lease receivable       $240,000      

 

The long-term time charter for the PGN FSRU Lampung with PGN LNG has an initial term of 20 years from the acceptance date of October 30, 2014 and the contract expires in 2034. The time charter hire payments began July 21, 2014 when the project was ready to begin commissioning. The lease element of the time charter is accounted for as a financing lease. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease and services elements for the initial term but exclude the variable fees from the charterer for vessel operating expenses and reimbursement of tax expenses. The charterer has an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung, which can be exercised after the third anniversary of the commencement of the charter until the twentieth anniversary, at stated prices in the time charter. The minimum contractual future revenues do not include the unexercised purchase option price. Should the purchase option be exercised in the short to medium term, the contractual price would exceed the net investment in financing lease, but the future hire payments would cease. The time charter also provides options for the charterer to extend the lease term for two five-year periods. Unexercised option periods are excluded from the minimum contractual future revenues.

 

 F-34 

 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The long-term time charter for the Höegh Gallant has an initial term of five years from April 2015 and the contract expires in 2020. The lease element of the time charter is accounted for as an operating lease. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease element and the services element which also covers the vessel operating expenses and taxes. Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the initial five-year charter until July 2025 at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, the Partnership exercised its option and intends to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors. Since the option was exercised after the balance sheet date, the estimated fixed payments for the exercised option periods are excluded in the minimum contractual future revenues.

 

The long-term time charter for the Höegh Grace has an initial term of 20 years and the contract expires in 2036. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease element and services element but exclude the variable fees from the charterer for vessel operating expenses and reimbursement of certain taxes. The non-cancellable charter period is 10 years. The initial term of the lease is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if the charterer waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, the Partnership will not be able to exercise its right to terminate in year 10. The charterer has an option to purchase the Höegh Grace at a price specified in the Höegh Grace charter in year 15 and year 20 of such charter. The minimum contractual future revenues do not include the unexercised purchase option price. Only the non-cancellable lease period is included the minimum contractual future revenues.

 

Net investment in financing lease:

 

The lease element of time charter hire for the PGN FSRU Lampung is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. The financing lease is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investment in financing lease, a receivable, as follows:

 

   As of December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Minimum lease payments   $589,074   $589,074 
Unguaranteed residual value   146,000    146,000 
Unearned income    (440,345)   (440,345)
Initial direct cost, net   3,095    3,095 
Net investment in financing lease at origination   297,824    297,824 
Principal repayment and amortization   (18,920)   (14,751)
Net investment in financing lease at period end    278,904    283,073 
Less: Current portion   (4,551)   (4,168)
Long term net investment in financing lease   $274,353   $278,905 
           
Net investment in financing lease consists of:          
Financing lease receivable  $240,000   $247,488 
Discounted unguaranteed residual value   38,904    35,585 
Net investment in financing lease at period end   $278,904   $283,073 

 

There was no impairment loss, or allowance for doubtful accounts, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

 

 F-35 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

6. Financial income (expense), net

 

The components of financial income (expense), net are as follows:

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Interest income  $947    725   $500 
Interest expense:               
Interest expense   (24,950)   (26,077)   (28,280)
Commitment fees   (381)   (37)   (977)
Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed   (2,361)   (700)   (828)
Total interest expense   (27,692)   (26,814)   (30,085)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment   1,030         
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments       4,681    2,463 
Other items, net:               
Foreign exchange gain (loss)   (396)   (193)   (968)
Bank charges, fees and other   (297)   (143)   (107)
Withholding tax on interest expense and other   (2,882)   (2,571)   (2,499)
Total other items, net   (3,575)   (2,907)   (3,574)
Total financial income (expense), net  $(29,290)   (24,315)  $(30,696)

    

Interest income related to cash balances and interest accrued on the advances to the joint ventures for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. As of January 1, 2019, interest expense includes reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income and amortization of the components excluded from hedge effectiveness related to derivatives due to the adoption of the revised guidance for derivatives and hedging. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Refer to note 2. For each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, gain (loss) on derivatives included the gain or loss on hedge ineffectiveness as well as amortization related to derivatives. Refer to note 17 for additional information on the types of gains and losses on derivatives included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. Interest expense also includes interest related to the revolving credit facility from Höegh LNG, the seller’s credit note until October 2017, the $385 million facility, the Lampung facility and the Gallant/Grace facility until January 31, 2019. The gain on debt extinguishment relates to the refinancing of the Gallant/Grace facility with the $385 million facility. When the entities owning the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace were acquired, a premium on the debt under the Gallant facility and the Grace facility was recognized. The unamortized balance was recorded as a gain when the debt was extinguished on January 31, 2019. Refer to notes 13, 15 and 16.

 

 F-36 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

7. Income tax

 

The components of income tax expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income are as follows: 

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Current tax (benefit) expense  $4,126    4,759   $35 
Deferred tax (benefit) expense for               
Change in temporary differences   3,341    3,290    4,189 
Tax loss and tax credit carried forward   (196)   247    (314)
Change in valuation allowance   4    9    (32)
Total deferred tax (benefit) expense   3,149    3,546    3,843 
Total income tax (benefit) expense  $7,275    8,305   $3,878 

 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are as follows:

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Cash flow hedge derivative instruments  $389    299   $347 
Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in OCI  $389    299   $347 

 

The reconciliation of the income before tax at the statutory rate in the Marshall Islands to the actual income tax expense for each year is as follows:

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Income before tax  $60,016    85,927   $63,068 
At applicable statutory tax rate               
Amount computed at corporate tax of 0%            
Foreign tax rate differences   5,425    7,513    7,119 
Permanent differences:               
Amended tax return: reinstatement of tax loss carryforward           (1,486)
Tax audit or amended tax return: change in uncertain tax position   558    (41)   (2,228)
Non-deductible interest expense   1,477    875    752 
Non-deductible withholding tax   717    838    686 
Non-deductible loss on derivatives   120         
Tax exemptions   (13)   (36)   (42)
Non-deductible other financial items   194    116    81 
Other non-deductible costs   45    63    59 
Tax credits   (1,252)   (1,032)   (1,031)
Adjustment for valuation allowance   4    9    (32)
Tax expense (benefit) for year  $7,275    8,305   $3,878 

 

 F-37 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows:

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Deferred tax assets:          
Accrued liabilities and other payables  $235   $196 
Derivative instruments   565    954 
Other equipment   9    9 
Tax credits carried forward   1,818    1,626 
Tax loss carryforward   57    53 
Valuation allowance   (57)   (53)
           
Deferred tax liabilities:          
Accrued interest income   (4,123)   (3,837)
Accrued liabilities and other payables   (385)   (154)
Financing lease   (10,451)   (7,594)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net  $(12,332)  $(8,800)

 

The Partnership is not subject to Marshall Islands corporate income taxes. The Partnership is subject to tax for earnings of its subsidiaries incorporated in Singapore, Indonesia, Cyprus, and the UK and for certain Colombian source income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the tax expense principally related to subsidiaries in Indonesia, Singapore and Colombia. The Singapore subsidiary’s taxable income mainly arises from internal interest income. The charterer in Colombia pays certain taxes directly to the Colombian tax authorities on behalf of the Partnership’s subsidiaries that own and operate the Höegh Grace. The tax payments are a mechanism for advance collection of part of the income taxes for the Colombian subsidiary and a final income tax on Colombian source income for the non-Colombian subsidiary. The Partnership concluded these third-party payments to the tax authorities represent income taxes that must be accounted for under the guidance for income taxes. The amount of non-cash income tax expense was $867, $852 and $861 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

 F-38 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, tax benefits were recorded of $1,486 and $2,228 for the reinstatement of the tax loss carryforward and the reversal of an uncertain tax position, respectively, due to the amendment of the 2016 tax return of the Indonesian subsidiary. The amendment was a result of a reevaluation of the application of the infrastructure industry exemption to regulations introduced in 2016 placing limitations on interest expense deductions. The infrastructure exemption was also applied by the Indonesian subsidiary for the reported income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

In December of 2018, the Indonesian tax authorities concluded an audit of corporate income tax filings for the Indonesian subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. The outcome of the audit reduced the historical tax loss carryforward, mainly due to disallowed expenses, resulting in a settlement of $885 with respect to the unrecognized tax benefits originating in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2018, tax benefits of $434 were recorded reflecting a reduction to the uncertain tax position originating in 2013 based on the audit's conclusion. In addition, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $418 for a tax position taken in the 2018 tax return which was not more-likely-than-not to be sustained.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $558 for a tax position to be taken in the 2019 tax return which is not more-likely-than-not to be sustained. As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized tax benefits were $2,283.

 

Benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. Changes in the unrecognized tax benefits is summarized below:

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1,  $(1,725)   (2,626)  $(398)
Increase related to prior year tax positions           (2,228)
Decrease related to prior year tax positions       434     
Increase related to current year tax positions   (558)   (418)    
Settlements       885     
Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,  $(2,283)   (1,725)  $(2,626)

 

Tax loss carryforwards of $455 expire between 2020 and 2023. Tax credits carried forward of $566 and $1,003 expire in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The tax returns of Singapore and Indonesia are subject to examination for four years and five years, respectively, from the year of filing. For Colombia, tax returns are subject to examination for three years from the due date of the return. The tax returns from the years 2015 and subsequent years remain subject to review for Indonesia and Singapore. For Colombia, tax returns from the years 2017 and subsequent years remain subject to review. Refer to note 18.

 

 F-39 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

8. Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

The components of prepaid expenses and other receivables are as follows:

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Refundable value added tax on import  $   $2,517 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables   2,534    450 
Total other prepaid expenses and other receivables  $2,534   $2,967 

 

Refundable value added tax was paid in Indonesia in local currency on the import of PGN FSRU Lampung into the country in 2014. The receivable was recovered by applying subsequent periods net value added tax liabilities against the receivable. As of December 31, 2019, the refundable balance was fully recovered. The charterer provided an advance for the funding of the refundable value added tax on import. Refer to note 14.

 

9. Investments in joint ventures

 

  

As of

December 31,

 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures  $3,270   $ 
Accumulated losses of joint ventures  $   $(2,808)

 

The Partnership has a 50% interest in each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (owner of the Neptune) and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (owner of the Cape Ann). The following table presents the summarized financial information of the joint ventures on a 100% combined basis.

  

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Time charter revenues  $77,051    79,654   $84,330 
Accrual historical boil-off claim (note 18)           (23,700)
Other income   7,814    6,684     
Total revenues   84,865    86,338    60,630 
Operating expenses   (18,088)   (21,864)   (17,256)
Depreciation and amortization   (20,524)   (20,065)   (20,244)
Impairment of long-lived assets (1)   (149)        
Operating income   46,104    44,409    23,130 
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments   (10,418)   16,992    14,388 
Other financial expense, net   (24,144)   (26,140)   (27,854)
Net income (loss)  $11,542    35,261   $9,664 
Share of joint ventures owned   50%   50%   50%
Share of joint ventures net income (loss) before eliminations   5,771    17,631    4,832 
Eliminations   307    307    307 
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures  $6,078    17,938   $5,139 

 

(1)At the completion of the class renewal survey of the Neptune, certain equipment was identified that was impaired.

 

 F-40 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Cash and cash equivalents  $17,897   $7,958 
Restricted cash   9,250    13,844 
Other current assets   973    1,894 
Total current assets   28,120    23,696 
Restricted cash   34,650    25,448 
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation   521,060    539,324 
Deferred charges       194 
Total long-term assets   555,710    564,966 
Current portion of long-term debt   28,297    26,599 
Amounts and loans due to owners and affiliates   629    1,215 
Derivative instruments   13,089    10,178 
Refund liabilities   26,691    26,055 
Other current liabilities   10,327    8,924 
Total current liabilities   79,033    72,971 
Long-term debt   375,091    403,052 
Loans due to owners and affiliates   7,663    7,071 
Derivative instruments   59,070    51,563 
Other long-term liabilities   40,952    43,526 
Total long-term liabilities   482,776    505,212 
Net assets (liabilities)  $22,021   $10,479 
Share of joint ventures owned   50%   50%
Share of joint ventures net assets (liabilities) before eliminations   11,011    5,240 
Eliminations   (7,741)   (8,048)
Accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures  $3,270   $(2,808)

 

 F-41 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

10. Advances to joint ventures

  

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Current portion of advances to joint ventures  $   $ 
Long-term advances to joint ventures   3,831    3,536 
Advances/shareholder loans to joint ventures  $3,831   $3,536 

 

The Partnership had advances of $3.0 million and $2.8 million due from SRV Joint Gas Ltd. as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership had advances of $0.8 million and $0.7 million due from SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

 

The advances consist of shareholder loans where the principal amounts, including accrued interest, are repaid based on available cash after servicing of long-term bank debt. The shareholder loans are due not later than the 12th anniversary of delivery date of each FSRU. The Neptune and the Cape Ann were delivered on November 30, 2009 and June 1, 2010, respectively. The shareholder loans are subordinated to long-term bank debt and the repayment plan is subject to quarterly discretionary revisions based on available cash after servicing of the long-term bank debt. Under terms of the shareholder loan agreements, the repayments shall be prioritized over any dividend payment to the owners of the joint ventures. The shareholder loans bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% per year. The other joint venture partners have, on a combined basis, an equal amount of shareholder loans outstanding at the same terms to each of the joint ventures.

 

The shareholder loans financed part of the construction of the vessels and operating expenses until the delivery and commencement of the operations of the Neptune and the Cape Ann. In 2011, the joint ventures began repaying principal and a portion of the interest expense based on available cash after servicing of the external debt. The quarterly payments have included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and a repayment of principal. Interest was accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment at the end of the loans after the original principal was fully repaid. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016 and all of the payments for the year ended December 31, 2017 represent payments of interest, including accrued interest to be repaid at the end of the loans.

 

As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Accordingly, the outstanding balance on the shareholder loans is classified as long-term as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Refer to note 18 under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.” The advances, including accrued interest, can be repaid based on available cash after servicing of long-term bank debt. There are no financial covenants in the joint ventures’ bank debt facilities, but certain other covenants and restrictions apply. Certain conditions apply to making distributions for the shareholder loans or dividends, including meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2019, both the 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratios were met by the joint venture owning the Neptune. As a result, the joint venture owning the Neptune qualifies to make payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio was met, however, the projected debt service coverage ratio was not met by the joint venture owning the Cape Ann. As a result, no payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions can be made by joint venture owning the Cape Ann until the debt service coverage ratio is met in future periods.

 

 F-42 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

11. Vessels and other equipment

  

       Dry-     
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Vessel   docking   Total 
Historical cost December 31, 2017  $706,458    6,667   $713,125 
Additions   257        257 
Historical cost December 31, 2018   706,715    6,667    713,382 
Depreciation for the year   (19,387)   (1,600)   (20,987)
Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2018   (50,871)   (4,200)   (55,071)
Vessels, net December 31, 2018   655,844    2,467    658,311 
                
Historical cost December 31, 2018   706,715    6,667    713,382 
Additions   183    3,107    3,290 
Historical cost December 31, 2019   706,898    9,774    716,672 
Depreciation for the year   (19,393)   (1,777)   (21,170)
Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2019   (70,264)   (5,977)   (76,241)
Vessels, net December 31, 2019  $636,634    3,797   $640,431 

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, other equipment consists principally of warehouse, office equipment and computers. As of January 1, 2019, other equipment includes a right-of-use asset due to the adoption of the revised guidance for leases. Refer to note 2. Adoption of the new leasing standard resulted in recording a right-of-use assets and lease liability for operating leases of $0.15 million and $0.15 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. Other equipment of $845 and $817 is recorded net of accumulated depreciation of $679 and $372 in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the right-of-use assets and lease liability for operating leases was $91. Depreciation expense for other equipment was $307, $159 and $79 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

 F-43 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

12. Intangibles and goodwill

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Above
market time
charter
   Option
for time
charter
extension
   Total
Intangibles
   Goodwill   Total 
Historical cost December 31, 2017  $22,760    8,000    30,760    251   $31,011 
Amortization for the year   (3,631)       (3,631)       (3,631)
Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2018   (10,272)       (10,272)       (10,272)
Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2018   12,488    8,000    20,488    251    20,739 
                          
Historical cost December 31, 2018   22,760    8,000    30,760    251    31,011 
Additions                    
Historical cost December 31, 2019   22,760    8,000    30,760    251    31,011 
Amortization for the year   (3,631)       (3,631)       (3,631)
Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2019   (13,903)       (13,903)       (13,903)
Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2019  $8,857    8,000    16,857    251   $17,108 

 

The following table presents estimated future amortization expense for the intangibles:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)   Total  
2020   $ 3,053  
2021     2,755  
2022     2,755  
2023     2,755  
2024     2,762  
2025 and thereafter   $ 2,777  

 

 F-44 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

13. Long-term debt

 

  

As of

December 31,

 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Lampung facility:          
Export credit tranche  $94,210   $109,096 
FSRU tranche   22,812    26,988 
Gallant facility:          
Commercial tranche       111,264 
Export credit tranche       29,333 
Grace facility:          
Commercial tranche       135,813 
Export credit tranche       27,750 
$385 million facility:          
Commercial tranche   249,635     
Export credit tranche   51,167     
Revolving credit tranche   48,300     
Outstanding principal   466,124    440,244 
Lampung facility unamortized debt issuance cost   (4,309)   (5,809)
Gallant facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed       215 
Grace facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed       895 
$385 million facility unamortized debt issuance costs   (4,854)    
Total debt   456,961    435,545 
Less: Current portion of long-term debt   (44,660)   (45,458)
Long-term debt  $412,301   $390,087 

 

Lampung facility

 

In September 2013, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (the “Borrower”) entered into a secured $299 million term loan facility (the “Lampung facility”) with a syndicate of banks and an export credit agency for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring. Höegh LNG is the guarantor for the Lampung facility. The facility was drawn in installments as construction was completed. The term loan facility includes two commercial tranches, the FSRU tranche and the Mooring tranche, and the export credit tranche. The interest rates vary by tranche. The full principal amount on the Mooring tranche and accrued interest was repaid in 2014.

 

The FSRU tranche has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.4%. The interest rate for the export credit tranche is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.3%. The FSRU tranche is repayable quarterly over 7 years with a final balloon payment of $16.5 million. The export credit tranche is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years assuming the balloon payment of the FSRU tranche is refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the outstanding balance upon maturity of the FSRU tranche. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 6.2% and 5.9% respectively. 

 

The primary financial covenants under the Lampung facility are as follows:

 

  § Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the preceding nine-month period tested on each quarterly repayment date;
  § Guarantor’s book equity must be greater than the higher of (i) $200 million and (ii) 25% of total assets; and
  § Guarantor’s free liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents or available draws on credit facilities) must be greater than $20 million.

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Borrower and the guarantor were in compliance with the financial covenants.

 

 F-45 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Höegh LNG, as guarantor, has issued the following guarantees related to the Lampung facility that remain in effect as of December 31, 2019: (a) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for the repayment of the balloon repayment installment of the FSRU tranche callable only at final maturity of the FSRU tranche; (b) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for all amounts due in respect of the export credit agent in the event that the export credit agent exercises its prepayment right for the export credit tranche if the FSRU tranche is not refinanced; and (c) undertaking that, if the time charter is terminated for an event of vessel force majeure, that under certain conditions, a guarantee will be provided for the outstanding debt, less insurance proceeds for vessel force majeure. In addition, all project agreements and guarantees are assigned to the bank syndicate and the export credit agent, all cash accounts and the shares in PT Hoegh LNG Lampung and Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. are pledged in favor of the bank syndicate and the export credit agent.

 

The Lampung facility requires cash reserves that are held for specifically designated uses, including working capital, operations and maintenance and debt service reserves. Distributions are subject to “waterfall” provisions that allocate revenues to specified priorities of use (such as operating expenses, scheduled debt service, targeted debt service reserves and any other reserves) with the remaining cash being distributable only on certain dates and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including meeting a 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio, no default or event of default then continuing or resulting from such distribution and the guarantor not being in breach of the financial covenants applicable to it. The Lampung facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower to change its business, sell or grant liens on its property including the PGN FSRU Lampung, incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness, make investments or acquisitions, enter into intercompany transactions and make distributions.   

 

Gallant/Grace facility

 

The Gallant/Grace facility included two borrowers, the Partnership's subsidiaries owning the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. The Gallant/Grace facility included two commercial tranches and the export credit tranche related to the Höegh Gallant (the “Gallant facility”) and a commercial tranche and the export credit tranche related to the Höegh Grace (the “Grace facility”). All of the tranches under the Gallant/Grace facility were cross-defaulted, cross-collateralized and cross-guaranteed. The obligations of the Borrowers were joint and several. The interest rates varied by tranche. Höegh LNG, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. and the Partnership were guarantors for the facility.

 

On January 31, 2019, the outstanding balance and the accrued interest of $303.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility was repaid from the proceeds of the $385 million facility. The unamortized balance of the fair value of debt assumed, or premium, was recorded as a gain when the debt was extinguished. Refer to note 6. The interest rate swaps related to the Gallant/Grace facility were terminated on the same date. Refer to note 17.

 

 F-46 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

$385 million facility

 

On January 29, 2019, the Partnership entered a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks to refinance the outstanding balances of the Gallant/Grace facility. Höegh LNG Partners LP is the borrower (the “Borrower”) for the senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility (the “$385 million facility”). The aggregate borrowing capacity is $320 million on the senior secured term loan and $63 million on the revolving credit tranche. Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, which owns the Höegh Gallant, and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., the owner of the Höegh Grace (collectively, the "Vessel Owners"), Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S., and Höegh LNG Egypt LLC, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, are guarantors for the facility (collectively, the "guarantors"). The facility is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, an assignment of the Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited’s, Höegh LNG Egypt LLC’s, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd.’s, Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.’s rights under their respective time charters and earnings and a pledge of the Borrower’s and Guarantor’s cash accounts. The Partnership and its subsidiaries have provided a pledge of shares in Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S., and Höegh LNG has provided a pledge of its shares in Höegh LNG Egypt LLC as security for the facility.

 

The senior secured term loan related to the $385 million facility includes a commercial tranche and the export credit tranche. Each tranche is divided into two term loans for each of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace

 

On January 31, 2019, the Partnership drew $320 million under the commercial and the export credit tranches on the $385 million facility to settle $303.2 million and $1.6 million of the outstanding balance and accrued interest, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility and used proceeds of $5.5 million to pay arrangement fees due under the $385 million facility. The remaining proceeds of $9.6 million were used for general partnership purposes. On August 12, 2019, the Partnership drew $48.3 million under the revolving credit tranche of the $385 million facility, of which $34.0 million was used to repay part of the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility due to Höegh LNG.

 

The commercial tranche and the revolving credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.30%. The commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit tranche is approximately 1.6%. The interest rate for the export credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have fixed interest rates and guarantee commissions of 3.98% and 3.88% on the term loans related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, respectively. The commercial tranche is repayable quarterly with a final balloon payment of $136.1 million due in January 2026. The term loans for export credit tranche related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace are repayable in quarterly installments with the final payments in October 2026 and April 2028, respectively, assuming the balloon payments of the commercial tranches are refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the total outstanding balance on both the terms loans of the export credit tranche of $9.5 million upon maturity of the commercial tranche. Any outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility is due in full in January 2026. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 4.7%.

  

The primary financial covenants under the $385 million facility are as follows:

 

  · The Partnership must maintain

  o Consolidated book equity (excluding hedge reserves and mark to market value of derivatives) equal to the greater of

  § 25% of total assets, and

  § $150 million

  o Consolidated working capital (current assets, excluding intercompany receivables and marked-to-market value of any financial derivative, less current liabilities, excluding intercompany payables, marked-to-market value of any financial derivative and the current portion of long-term debt) shall at all time be greater than zero
  o Minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents and available draws under a bank credit facility for a term of more than 12 months) equal to the greater of

  § $15 million, and

  § $2.5 million multiplied by the number of vessels owned or leased by the Partnership (prorated for partial ownership), subject to a cap of $20 million

  o A ratio of combined EBITDA for the Vessel Owners to debt service (principal repayments, guarantee commission, commitment fees and interest expense) for the preceding twelve months of a minimum of 115%

 

 F-47 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Borrower and the Vessel Owners were in compliance with the financial covenants.

 

In addition, a security maintenance ratio based on the aggregate market value of the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace and any additional security must be at least 125% of the aggregate outstanding loan balance.

 

If the security maintenance ratio is not maintained, the relevant Borrower has 30 days to provide more security or to repay part of the loan to be in compliance with the ratio no later than 30 days after notice from the lenders.

 

Under the $385 million facility, cash accounts are freely available for the use of the Borrower and the guarantors, unless there is an event of default. Events of default include, among other things, change of control of the Partnership due to the failure of Höegh LNG to own at least 25% of the Partnership’s common units. Cash can be distributed as dividends or to service loans of owners and affiliates provided that after the distribution the Borrower and the guarantors would remain in compliance with the financial covenants. The $385 million facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower and the guarantors to change their business, grant liens on the Höegh Gallant or the Höegh Grace, incur additional indebtedness that is not at pari passu with the $385 million facility, enter into intercompany debt that is not subordinated to the $385 million facility and for the Vessel Owners to make investments or acquisitions.

 

The principal on long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2019 was repayable as follows:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)   Total 
2020   $44,660 
2021    123,557 
2022    25,597 
2023    25,597 
2024    25,597 
2025 and thereafter    221,116 
Total   $466,124 

 

The table includes the maturity of the FSRU tranche of the Lampung facility in 2021 and assumes the exercise of the prepayment right for the export credit tranche of the Lampung facility in the same period.

 

14. Accrued liabilities and other payables 

  

As of

December 31,

 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Accrued operating and administrative expenses  $3,314   $3,004 
Accrued property tax   3,033     
Accrued interest   2,850     
Current tax payable   818    1,375 
Refund liabilities (note 5)   125    1,834 
Current portion of advance for refundable value added tax       429 
Lease liability (note 2 and note 11)   75     
Other accruals and payables   949    816 
Total accrued liabilities and other payables  $11,164   $7,458 

 

Refer to note 5 for additional information on the refund liability to charterers. During 2019, the advance from the charterer for refundable value added tax was fully repaid. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new leasing standard. Refer to notes 2 and 11.

 

 F-48 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

15. Related party transactions

 

Income (expenses) from related parties

 

As described in Related party agreements below, subsidiaries of Höegh LNG have provided administrative services to the Partnership and ship management and/or technical support services for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

 

Amounts included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 or included in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Revenues               
Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant (1)  $47,173    47,108   $46,382 
Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Höegh LNG (2)           (2,496)
Operating expenses               
Vessel operating expenses (3)   (24,523)   (21,520)   (21,124)
Hours, travel expense and overhead (4) and Board of Directors' fees (5)   (4,072)   (3,671)   (3,284)
Financial (income) expense               
Interest income from joint ventures (6)   295    273    370 
Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG (7)   (1,882)   (2,938)   (3,934)
Total  $16,991    19,252   $15,914 

 

   As of 
Balance sheet  December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Equity        
Cash contribution from Höegh LNG (8)  $   $1,701 
Repayment of indemnification received from Höegh LNG (8)   (64)   (2,353)
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees (5)   194    200 
Other and contribution from owner (9)   485    472 
Total  $615   $20 

 

1) Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant: A subsidiary of Höegh LNG, EgyptCo, leases the Höegh Gallant.
2) Time charter revenues indemnified by/refunded to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG certain previous indemnification payments in 2017.
3) Vessel operating expenses: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provides ship management of vessels, including crews and the provision of all other services and supplies.
4) Hours, travel expenses and overhead: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provide management, accounting, bookkeeping and administrative support under administrative service agreements. These services are charges based upon the actual hours incurred for each individual as registered in the time-write system based on a rate which includes a provision for overhead and any associated travel expenses.
5) Board of Directors’ fees: Total Board of Directors’ fees were $496, $501 and $467 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Part of the compensation is awarded as common units of the Partnership. Effective June 4, 2019, a total of 11,180 common units of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $194 for part of directors’ fees for 2019 under the Höegh LNG Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan. Effective June 6, 2018 and May 22, 2017, a total of 11,050 and 9,805 common units, respectively, of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $200 and $189, respectively, for part of directors’ fees for 2018 and 2017. The awards were recorded as administrative expense and as an issuance of common units. Common units are recorded when issued.

 

 F-49 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

6) Interest income from joint ventures: The Partnership and its joint venture partners have provided subordinated financing to the joint ventures as shareholder loans. Interest income for the Partnership’s shareholder loans to the joint ventures is recorded as interest income.
7) Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG and affiliates: Höegh LNG and its affiliates provided an $85 million revolving credit facility for general partnership purposes. The Partnership incurred a commitment fee on the undrawn balance until January 29, 2018 and an interest expense on the drawn balance. A seller’s credit note to finance part of the Höegh Gallant acquisition incurred interest expense until it was repaid in October 2017.
8) Cash contribution from/ distribution to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, Höegh LNG made indemnification payments to the Partnership or received refunds of indemnification from the Partnership which were recorded as contributions or distributions to equity.
9) Other and contribution from owner: Höegh LNG granted share-based incentives to certain key employees whose services benefit the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as administrative expenses and as a contribution from owner since the Partnership is not invoiced for this employee benefit. Effective March 21, 2019 and September 14, 2018, the Partnership granted or extended the terms for 10,917 and 28,018 phantom units, respectively, to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as an administrative expense and as increase in equity.
   
 

Acquisitions from Höegh LNG: Effective January 1, 2017 and December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired a 51% and a 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities from Höegh LNG. Refer to note 3. The Partnership’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Conflicts Committee of the Board (the “Conflicts Committee”) approved the purchase prices for the acquisitions. The Conflicts Committee retained financial advisors to assist with its evaluation of the transactions.

   
  Dividends to Höegh LNG: The Partnership has declared and paid quarterly distributions totaling $28.4 million, $28.2 million and $27.0 million to Höegh LNG for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

Receivables and payables from related parties

 

Amounts due from affiliates

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Amounts due from affiliates  $4,296   $4,328 
           

 

The amount due from affiliates is a receivable for time charter hire from a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, EgyptCo, for the Höegh Gallant time charter. The time charter hire is due 18 days from the receipt of the invoice. Time charter hire is invoiced at the end of the month in arrears.

 

 F-50 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Amounts, loans and promissory note due to owners and affiliates

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Amounts due to owners and affiliates  $2,513   $2,301 

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounts due to owners and affiliates principally relate to trade payables for services provided by subsidiaries of Höegh LNG.

 

Revolving credit facility

 

   As of 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Revolving credit facility  $8,792   $39,292 

 

In August 2014, upon the closing of the IPO, the Partnership entered into an $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG, to be used to fund acquisitions and working capital requirements of the Partnership. The credit facility is unsecured and was repayable on January 1, 2020. On May 28, 2019, the repayment date on the $85 million revolving credit facility was extended to January 1, 2023 and the terms amended for the interest rate to be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.4% in 2019, 3.0% in 2020 and 4.0% thereafter. The outstanding revolving credit facility had a weighted average interest rate for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 of 6.6% and 6.3%, respectively

 

Related party agreements

 

In connection with the IPO the Partnership entered into several agreements including:

 

(i)An $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG, which was undrawn at the closing of the IPO;

 

(ii)An omnibus agreement with Höegh LNG, the general partner, and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (the “operating company”) governing, among other things:

 

a.To what extent the Partnership and Höegh LNG may compete with each other;

 

  b. The Partnership’s rights of first offer on certain FSRUs and LNG carriers operating under charters of five or more years; and

 

  c. Höegh LNG’s provision of certain indemnities to the Partnership.

 

(iii)An administrative services agreement with Hoegh LNG Services Ltd., UK (“Höegh UK”), pursuant to which Höegh UK provided certain administrative services to the Partnership. This agreement expired during 2019; and

 

(iv)Höegh UK entered into administrative services agreements with Höegh LNG AS (“Höegh Norway”) and Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited, pursuant to which Höegh Norway and Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited provided Höegh UK certain administrative services. Additionally, the operating company entered into an administrative services agreement with Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited to allow Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited to provide services directly to the operating company. Each of these agreements expired, or were terminated by mutual agreement, during 2019.

 

 F-51 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Existing agreements remained in place following the IPO for provision of certain services to the Partnership’s vessel owning joint ventures or entity, of which the material agreements are as follows:

  

  · The joint ventures are parties to ship management agreements with Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (“Höegh LNG Management”) pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides the joint ventures with technical and maritime management and crewing of the Neptune and the Cape Ann, and Höegh Norway is a party to a sub-technical support agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides technical support services with respect to the PGN FSRU Lampung; and

 

  · The joint ventures are parties to commercial and administration management agreements with Höegh Norway, and PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a party to a technical information and services agreement with Höegh Norway.

 

Subsequent to the IPO, the Partnership has acquired vessel owning entities. Existing agreements remained in place following the acquisition for the time charter of the Höegh Gallant and receipt of certain services, of which the material agreements are as follows:

 

  · Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch has a Lease and Maintenance Agreement (the “time charter”) with EgyptCo for the lease and maintenance of the Höegh Gallant and the provision of crew and certain ship management services for a combined daily hire rate. The time charter started in April 2015 with an expiration date in April 2020; and

 

  · Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch is party to a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides the technical management of the Höegh Gallant, and Hoegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. (“Höegh Maritime Management”) is a party to a secondment agreement, as amended, with Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited pursuant to which Höegh Maritime Management provides qualified crew for the Höegh Gallant;

 

  · Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch is party to a management agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides administrative, commercial and technical management services, each as instructed from time to time by Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited.

 

Existing agreements remained in place for the time charter of the Höegh Grace following the acquisition and receipt of certain services, of which the material agreements are as follows:

 

  · a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides technical and maritime management services;

 

  · a manning agreement with Höegh Fleet Services Philippines Inc. to recruit and engage crew for the vessel;

 

  · a technical services agreement with Höegh Norway to provide technical services for the vessel;

 

  · a management consulting agreement with Höegh Norway to provide support related to certain management activities;

 

  · a crew recruitment consulting services agreement with Höegh Maritime Management to provide professional consulting services in connection with recruitment of crew and other employees;

 

  · an agreement for provision of professional payment services with Höegh Maritime Management to provide services in connection with the payment of monthly salaries to the crew and employees working on the vessel; and

 

  · a spare parts procurement and insurance services agreement with Höegh LNG Management to arrange for the supply of spare parts and the insurance coverage for the vessel.

 

In December 2019, the Partnership and the operating company entered an administrative services agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides certain administrative services to the Partnership.

 

 F-52 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Indemnifications

 

Environmental indemnifications:

 

Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agreed to indemnify the Partnership until August 12, 2019 against certain environmental and toxic tort liabilities with respect to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership to the extent arising prior to the time they were contributed or sold to the Partnership. No indemnification claims were filed for environmental liabilities under the agreement prior to its expiration.

 

Other indemnifications:

 

Under the omnibus agreement Höegh LNG also agreed to indemnify the Partnership for losses:

 

1.related to certain defects in title to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership and any failure to obtain, prior to the time they were contributed to the Partnership, certain consents and permits necessary to conduct the business, which liabilities arose within three years after the closing of the IPO;

 

2.related to certain tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership prior to the time they were contributed or sold;

 

3.in the event that the Partnership did not receive hire rate payments under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on August 12, 2014 through the earlier of (i) the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung or (ii) the termination of such time charter. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the September and October 2014 invoices not paid by PGN LNG in 2014 (refer to note 18);

 

4.with respect to any obligation to pay liquidated damages to PGN LNG under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for failure to deliver the PGN FSRU Lampung by the scheduled delivery date set forth in the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter;

 

5.with respect to any non-budgeted expenses (including repair costs) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project (including the construction of the Mooring) occurring prior to the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung pursuant to the time charter; and

 

6.pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 12, 2015, Höegh LNG confirmed that the indemnification provisions of the omnibus agreement include indemnification for all non-budgeted, non-creditable Indonesian value added taxes and non-budgeted Indonesian withholding taxes, including any related impact on cash flow from PT Hoegh LNG Lampung and interest and penalties associated with any non-timely Indonesian tax filings related to the ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring whether incurred (i) prior to the closing date of the IPO, (ii) after the closing date of the IPO to the extent such taxes, interest, penalties or related impact on cash flows relate to periods of ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring and are not subject to prior indemnification payments or deemed reimbursable by the charterer under its audit of the taxes related to the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for periods up to and including June 30, 2015, or (iii) after June 30, 2015 to the extent withholding taxes exceed the minimum amount of withholding tax due under Indonesian tax regulations due to lack of documentation or untimely withholding tax filings.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for non-budgeted expenses (including warranty provisions, other non-budgeted expenses and replacement capital expenditure) of $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which were recorded as a contribution to equity. Indemnification payments received from Höegh LNG are subject to repayment to the extent the amounts are subsequently recovered from insurance or deemed reimbursable by the charterer.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to insurance proceeds received related to the warranty provision and costs for previous years determined to be reimbursable by the charterer. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $2.5 million related to previously recognized revenue from 2014 that was deemed reimbursable in 2017 and an additional cost recovery of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a cash distribution from equity. Refer to note 18.

 

 F-53 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreement entered into with respect to the purchase of the Höegh Gallant entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

 

  1. losses from breach of warranty;

 

  2. losses related to certain environmental and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Gallant prior to the closing date;

 

  3. all capital gains tax or other export duty incurred in connection with the transfer of the Höegh Gallant outside of Höegh LNG Cyprus Limited’s permanent establishment in a Public Free Zone in Egypt;

 

  4. any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to Höegh LNG Management with respect to payroll taxes;

 

  5. any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the time charter with EgyptCo or EgyptCo’s time charter with EGAS; and

 

  6. liabilities under the Gallant/Grace facility not attributable to the Höegh Gallant.

 

Additionally, Höegh LNG has guaranteed the payment of hire by EgyptCo pursuant to the time charter for the Höegh Gallant under certain circumstances.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the time charter with EgyptCo of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 18.

 

Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025.

 

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreements entered into with respect to the acquisitions of the 51% and 49% ownership interests in the Höegh Grace entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

 

  1. losses from breach of warranty;

 

  2. losses related to certain environmental liabilities, damages or repair costs and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Grace prior to the closing date;

 

  3. any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to tax authorities with respect to payroll taxes, taxes related to social security payments, corporate income taxes (including income tax for equality and surcharge on income tax for equality), withholding tax, port associations, local Cartagena tax, and financial transaction tax, including any penalties associated with taxes to the extent not reimbursed by the charterer;

 

  4. any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with commencement of services under the Höegh Grace charter with SPEC; and

 

  5. any losses suffered or incurred in relation to the performance guarantee the Partnership provided with respect to the Höegh Grace charter, up to Höegh LNG’s pro rata share of such losses, based on its remaining ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. This provision is not applicable after December 1, 2019, when the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

 

 F-54 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

On September 27, 2017, the Partnership entered into an indemnification agreement with Höegh LNG with respect to the boil-off claims under the Neptune and Cape Ann time charters, pursuant to which Höegh LNG will, among other things, indemnify the Partnership for its share of any losses and expenses related to or arising from the failure of either Neptune or Cape Ann to meet the performance standards related to the daily boil-off of LNG under their respective time charters (including any cash impact that may result from any settlement with respect to such claims, including any reduction in the hire rate under either time charter.) For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Partnership received indemnification payments of $0.3 million from Höegh LNG. Indemnification payments were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 18.

 

16. Financial Instruments

 

Fair value measurements

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

 

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition – The fair value of the cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash approximates its carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

Amounts due from (to) owners and affiliates – The fair value of the non-interest bearing receivables or payables approximates their carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets since the receivables or payables are to be settled consistent with trade receivables and payables.

 

Derivative instruments – The fair values of the interest rates swaps are estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the relevant LIBOR interest rate curves, adjusted for the subsidiary’s credit worthiness and the credit worthiness of the counterparty to the derivative.

 

Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures – The fair values of the fixed rate subordinated shareholder loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the joint ventures.

 

Lampung, Gallant, Grace and $385 million facilities – The fair values of the variable rate debt are estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the estimated currently available margins and LIBOR interest rates as of the balance sheet date for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the Partnership.

 

Revolving credit due to owners and affiliates – The fair value of the variable rate debt is estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the estimated currently available margins and LIBOR interest rates as of the balance sheet date for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the Partnership.

 

The fair value estimates are categorized by a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:

 

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

 F-55 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The following table includes the estimated fair value and carrying value of those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, as well as the estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are not accounted for at a fair value on a recurring basis. Trade payables and receivables for which the estimated fair values are equivalent to carrying values are not specified below.

 

       As of   As of 
       December 31, 2019   December 31, 2018 
       Carrying   Fair   Carrying   Fair 
       amount   value   amount   value 
       Asset   Asset   Asset   Asset 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Level   (Liability)   (Liability)   (Liability)   (Liability) 
Recurring:                         
Cash and cash equivalents   1   $39,126    39,126    26,326   $26,326 
Restricted cash   1    20,693    20,693    19,128    19,128 
Derivative instruments   2    (14,935)   (14,935)   (1,498)   (1,498)
Other:                         
Amounts due from affiliate   2    4,296    4,296    4,328    4,328 
Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures   2    3,831    4,029    3,536    3,579 
Current amounts due to owners and affiliates   2    (2,513)   (2,513)   (2,301)   (2,301)
Lampung facility   2    (112,713)   (119,598)   (130,275)   (142,087)
Gallant facility   2            (140,812)   (141,538)
Grace facility   2            (164,458)   (164,210)
$385 million facility   2    (344,248)   (352,219)        
Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates   2   $(8,792)   (8,717)   (39,292)  $(38,999)

 

Financing Receivables

 

The following table contains a summary of the loan receivables by type of borrower and the method by which the credit quality is monitored on a quarterly basis:

 

Class of Financing Receivables   Credit Quality       As of December 31,  
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)   Indicator   Grade   2019     2018  
Trade receivable   Payment activity   Performing   $ 735     $ 1,228  
Amounts due from affiliate   Payment activity   Performing     4,296       4,328  
Advances/ loans to joint ventures   Payment activity   Performing   $ 3,831     $ 3,536  

 

The shareholder loans to joint ventures are classified as advances to joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to note 10.

 

 F-56 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

17. Risk management and concentrations of risk

 

Derivative instruments can be used in accordance with the overall risk management policy.

 

Interest rate risk, derivative instruments and cash flow hedges

 

Cash flow hedging strategy

 

The Partnership is exposed to fluctuations in cash flows from floating interest rate exposure on its long-term debt used principally to finance its vessels. Interest rate swaps are used for the management of the floating interest rate risk exposure. The interest rate swaps have the effect of converting a portion of the outstanding debt from a floating to a fixed rate over the life of the interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps exchange a receipt of floating interest for a payment of fixed interest which reduce the exposure to interest rate variability on the Partnership’s outstanding floating-rate debt over the life of the interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2019, there are interest rate swap agreements related to the Lampung facility ("Lampung interest rate swaps") and the commercial tranche of the $385 million facility ("$385 million interest rate swaps") floating rate debt that are designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. As of December 31, 2018, there were interest rate swap agreements related to the Lampung and $385 million facilities floating rate debt that were designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. In addition, there were interest rate swap agreements related to the Gallant and Grace facilities floating rate debt. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 for these interest rate swaps as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Gallant and Grace facilities which was planned to occur in January 2019. As of January 31, 2019, the commercial and export credit tranches of the $385 million facility were drawn, and the Gallant and Grace facilities were repaid. The interest rate swaps related to the Gallant and Grace facilities were also terminated on the same date. As of December 31, 2019, the following interest rate swap agreements were outstanding:

 

           Fair         
           value       Fixed 
   Interest       carrying       interest 
  rate   Notional   amount       rate 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  index   amount   liability   Term   (1) 
LIBOR-based debt                    
Lampung interest rate swaps (2)   LIBOR   $117,022   $(3,610)   Sep 2026    2.800%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478   $(3,241)   Jan 2026    2.941%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478   $(2,909)   Oct 2025    2.838%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478   $(2,699)   Jan 2026    2.735%
$385 million facility swaps (2)   LIBOR   $61,478   $(2,476)   Jan 2026    2.650%

 

1)Excludes the margins paid on the floating-rate debt.
2)All interest rate swaps are U.S. dollar denominated and the notional amount reduces quarterly from the effective date of the interest rate swaps.

 

 F-57 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The Borrower under the Lampung facility entered five forward starting swap agreements with identical terms for a total notional amount of $237.1 million with an effective date of March 17, 2014. The swaps amortize over 12 years to match the amortization profile of the Lampung facility and subsequent financing and exchange 3-month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments at 2.8%. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments on the Lampung facility and subsequent financing. As of December 29, 2014, a prepayment of $7.9 million on the Lampung facility occurred which resulted in an amendment of the original interest rate swaps and the hedge was de-designated for accounting purposes. The other terms of the amended interest rate swaps did not change but the nominal amount of the interest rate swaps was reduced to match the outstanding debt. The amended interest rate swaps were re-designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes.

 

As of October 1, 2015, the Partnership acquired the Höegh Gallant entities which had outstanding debt under the Gallant facility and three associated interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $146.3 million. The swaps amortized to match the debt amortization of the Gallant facility until the scheduled repayment date in September 2019. The swaps exchanged 3 month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments ranging from 1.9105% to 1.9145%. As of October 1, 2015, the interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $146.3 million of the commercial tranches of the Gallant facility. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Gallant facility which was planned to occur in January 2019.

 

Effective as of January 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the Höegh Grace entities which had outstanding debt under the Grace facility and three associated interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $164.0 million. The swaps amortized to match the debt amortization of the Grace facility until the scheduled repayment date in June 2020. The swaps exchanged 3 month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments ranging from 2.305% to 2.315%. As of January 1, 2017, the interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $164.0 million of the commercial tranches of the Grace facility. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Grace facility which was planned to occur in January 2019.

 

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership had entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a nominal amount of $130.0 million to hedge part of the interest rate risk on the floating element of the interest rate for the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility. The Partnership makes fixed payments of 2.941% and 2.838%, based on a nominal amount of $65.0 million for each, in exchange for floating payments. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $130.0 million of the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility which was expected to be drawn and was drawn on January 31, 2019. In February 2019, the Partnership entered into interest rate swaps related to the $385 million facility with a nominal amount of $127.7 million for which the Partnership makes fixed payments of 2.650% and 2.735% based on nominal amount of $63.8 million for each. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $127.7 million of the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility. The export credit tranches have a fixed interest rate and, therefore, no variability in cash flows as a result of changes in interest rates. 

 

The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments, segregated by type of contract, on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

   Current   Long-term   Current   Long-term 
   assets:   assets:   liabilities:   liabilities: 
   derivative   derivative   derivative   derivative 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  instruments   instruments   instruments   instruments 
As of December 31, 2019                    
Interest rate swaps  $   $   $(2,907)  $(12,028)
As of December 31, 2018                    
Interest rate swaps  $1,199   $   $(259)  $(2,438)

 

 F-58 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 2019 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

  Interest expense   Income tax benefit 
Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps in cash flow hedging relationships:          
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness  $(956)  $ 
Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness   966     
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach   (987)   389 
Settlement of cash flow hedge   199     
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments  $(778)  $389 

 

The settlement of cash flow hedge related to the interest rate swaps for Gallant/Grace facility. The Gallant/Grace interest rate swaps were terminated when the facility was extinguished on January 31, 2019. Due to the termination, the counterparties of the Gallant/Grace interest rate swaps paid settlement amounts resulting in a gain on the settlement of the cash flow hedge.

 

The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in total gains (losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

   Year ended 
   December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2018   2017 
Interest rate swaps:          
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedge  $(990)  $(2)
Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness   2,969    3,320 
Reclassification discontinued hedge from OCI   3,557     
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income   (855)   (855)
Unrealized gains (losses)   4,681    2,463 
Realized gains (losses)        
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments  $4,681   $2,463 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the reclassification to earnings from OCI for the discontinued cash flow hedges relates to Gallant/Grace facility which was to be refinanced on January 31, 2019. The accumulated other comprehensive income balance for the cash flow hedge is reclassified to earnings when the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to occur.

 

The effect of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps and the related tax effects on other comprehensive income, changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and on earnings is as follows as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. 

 

 F-59 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

   Cash Flow Hedge 
   Accumulated other comprehensive income   Earnings 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Before tax
gains
(losses)
   Tax benefit (expense)   Accumulated OCI:
Net of tax
   Interest
expense
   Tax
benefit
 
Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2018  $(5,902)   565   $(5,337)          
Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach   (625)       (625)          
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge   (13,535)       (13,535)          
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness   956        956    (956)    
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach   987    (389)   598    (987)   389 
Other comprehensive income for period   (12,217)   (389)   (12,606)          
Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2019  $(18,119)   176   $(17,943)          
Gain (loss) reclassified to earnings                 $(1,943)  $389 

 

The effect of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps and the related tax effects on other comprehensive income and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) is as follows as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

   Cash Flow Hedge     
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Before tax
gains (losses)
   Tax benefit
(expense)
   Net of tax   Accumulated
OCI
 
Balance as of December 31, 2016  $(6,947)   1,211    (5,736)  $(5,736)
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge   2,480        2,480    2,480 
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings   855    (347)   508    508 
Other comprehensive income for period   3,335    (347)   2,988    2,988 
Balance as of December 31, 2017  $(3,612)   864    (2,748)  $(2,748)
                     
Balance as of December 31, 2017  $(3,612)   864    (2,748)  $(2,748)
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge   412        412    412 
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings   855    (299)   556    556 
Reclassification of discontinued cash flow hedge to earnings   (3,557)       (3,557)   (3,557)
Other comprehensive income for period   (2,290)   (299)   (2,589)   (2,589)
Balance as of December 31, 2018  $(5,902)   565    (5,337)  $(5,337)

 

As of December 31, 2019, the estimated amounts to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings during the next twelve months is $3.2 million.

 

Foreign exchange risk

 

All financing, interest expenses from financing and most of the Partnership’s revenue and expenditures for vessel improvements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Certain operating expenses can be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no derivative instruments have been used to manage foreign exchange risk.

 

 F-60 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Credit risk

 

Credit risk is the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties related to cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and interest rate swap agreements. Further, the Partnership has future exposure for Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to the Partnership for future time charter hire under the option exercised for the Höegh Gallant and for indemnification payments related to the boil-off claim for the joint ventures. Refer to note 18. In order to minimize counterparty risk, bank relationships are established with counterparties with acceptable credit ratings at the time of the transactions. Credit risk related to receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customers’ or counterparty’s financial condition. PGN guarantees PGN LNG's obligations under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter. The other time charters do not have parent company guarantees.

 

Concentrations of risk

 

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and derivative contracts (interest rate swaps). The maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value at the balance sheet date. The Partnership does not have a policy of requiring collateral or security. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are placed with qualified financial institutions. Periodic evaluations are performed of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions. In addition, exposure is limited by diversifying among counterparties. There are three charterers so there is a concentration of risk related to trade receivables. Credit risk related to trade receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customer’s financial condition. No allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. While the maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value of trade receivables at the balance sheet date, should the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung or the Höegh Grace terminate prematurely, or Höegh LNG prematurely terminate the Subsequent Charter for the Höegh Gallant, or the option to acquire the PGN FSRU Lampung be exercised, there could be delays in obtaining new time charters and the hire rates could be lower depending upon the prevailing market conditions.

 

 F-61 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

 

18. Commitments and contingencies

 

Contractual commitments

 

As of December 31, 2019, there were no material contractual purchase commitments.

 

Claims and Contingencies

 

Joint ventures claims and accruals

 

Under the Neptune and the Cape Ann time charters, the joint ventures undertake to ensure that the vessel meets specified performance standards at all times during the term of the time charters. The performance standards include the vessel not exceeding a maximum average daily boil-off of LNG, subject to certain contractual exclusions, as specified in the time charter. Pursuant to the charters, the hire rate is subject to deduction by the charterer by, among other things, sums due in respect of the joint ventures’ failure to satisfy the specified performance standards during the period. The charterer requested that the joint ventures calculate and present the boil-off since the beginning of the charters, compared with maximum average daily boil-off allowed under the time charter. The charters for the Neptune and Cape Ann started in 2009 and 2010, respectively. On September 8, 2017, the charterer notified the joint ventures that it was formally making a claim for compensation in accordance with the provisions of the charters for a stated quantity of LNG exceeding the maximum average daily boil-off since the beginning for the charters. The claim asserted a gross amount of compensation of $58 million for the excess boil-off volume but the claim recognized that the calculations for the amount required adjustment for allowable exclusions under the charters. Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures determined the liability associated with the boil-off claim was probable and could be reasonably estimated resulting in a total accrual of $23.7 million which was recorded as a reduction of time charter revenues in the third quarter of 2017. The Partnership’s 50% share of the accrual was approximately $11.9 million, which remained unchanged as of December 31, 2017. As a precaution, the joint ventures have suspended payments on their shareholder loans as of September 30, 2017 pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Refer to note 10. The charterer and the joint ventures referred the claim to arbitration. The charterer's claim as submitted in the arbitration request was for a gross amount of $52 million, covering a shorter time period for the time period for the first performance period as defined in the time charters, as well as interest and expenses. The charterer reserved it right to make a further claim with respect to subsequent performance periods. Subsequently, the charterer and the joint ventures asked the arbitration tribunal for a partial determination on certain key contractual interpretations and the proceedings commenced in November 2018.

 

In March 2019, the tribunal’s determination was received. The determination did not cover all the questions of contractual interpretation on which there is disagreement between the parties. With the exception of one issue, the tribunal’s conclusions on the contractual interpretations were unambiguous. For the remaining issue related to the calculation of a deduction from the gross claim, the tribunal did not specify how the deduction should be determined. As a result, there remained significant uncertainty in the evaluation of the potential outcome of the boil-off claim. Based on the tribunal's determination, the joint ventures updated their estimates to cover the period from the start of the time charters to December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the range of estimates is not directly comparable to the $52 million gross claim initially raised by the charterer through the end of the defined performance period. Depending on interpretations of the tribunal’s determination for the deduction to the gross claim and the other disputed contractual provisions, the joint ventures estimate that their aggregate liability associated with the boil-off claim is in the millions of dollars and could range between the mid-to-upper teens to the mid-$30's, of which the Partnership’s share would be 50%. Based upon the additional information from the tribunal’s determination and updated estimates of the potential range of liability, the joint ventures concluded the existing accrual of $23.7 million continued to represent their best estimate of the probable liability as of December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2018. The Partnership’s 50% share of the accrual remained at approximately $11.9 million as of December 31, 2018.

 

 F-62 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

On June 14, 2019, the charterer served an updated claim submission for approximately $54 million to the tribunal, incorporating claims for the second performance period and certain other claims. The owners did not agree with the charterer's claims or its interpretation of the deduction to the gross claim in accordance with the tribunal's determination. The joint ventures assessed the additional information available and updated the estimates for the potential range of outcomes for each quarter durng 2019. The joint ventures concluded the recorded accrual continued to be the best estimate within the range.

 

The parties have continued discussions with the objective of reaching a negotiated solution to settle the boil-off claim. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached was subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Refer to note 23. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the effective date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims.

 

Höegh LNG and the other major owner guarantee the performance and payment obligations of the joint ventures under the time charters.

 

The Partnership will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for its share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement. The remaining costs to be incurred for the technical modifications of the vessels are estimated to be $0.8 million, of which the Partnership’s 50% share would be $0.4 million. Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for the Partnership’s share of such costs. For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Partnership received indemnification payments of $0.3 million from Höegh LNG, related to the boil-off claim. Indemnification payments were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 15.

 

Indonesian corporate income tax

 

Based upon the Partnership’ s experience in Indonesia, tax regulations, guidance and interpretation in Indonesia may not always be clear and may be subject to alternative interpretations or changes in interpretations over time. The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary is subject to examination by the Indonesian tax authorities for the years from 2015 through 2018 for up to five years following the completion of a fiscal year. As a result, it is likely there will be an examination by the Indonesian tax authorities for the tax return for 2015 during 2020. For December 31, 2019, the Indonesian subsidiary plans to request a refund for overpayment of estimated taxes for 2019 when filing the 2019 tax return which will result in an automatic examination of the tax return for the year ended December 31, 2019. The examinations may lead to ordinary course adjustments or proposed adjustments to the Partnership’s taxes with respect to years under examination. In December 2018, the examination for the years 2013 and 2014 was completed. Refer to note 7 for additional information. Future examinations may or may not result in changes to the Partnership’ s provisions on tax filings from 2015 through 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions were $2.3 million.

 

Indonesian property tax

 

The Partnership's Indonesian subsidiary was assessed for Land and Building tax (“property tax”) and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The assessment was due to the issuance of the Indonesian Minister of Finance’s Decree No. 186/PMK.03/2019 (“PMK 186/2019”) which defines FSRUs as a “Building” subject to the tax. The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary plans to appeal the assessment. Depending on the level of appeal pursued, the appeal process could take a number of years to conclude. There can be no assurance of the result of the appeal or whether the Indonesian subsidiary will prevail. As a result, the property tax and penalties were expensed for the year ended December 31, 2019. Until the appeal is concluded, the Indonesian subsidiary will be required to pay an annual property tax of approximately $0.6 million. Property tax and penalties were reported as a component of vessel operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. 

 

 F-63 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

PGN LNG claims including delay liquidated damages

 

The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for i) any hire rate payments not received under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on August 12, 2014 through the acceptance date of the PGN FSRU Lampung and ii) non-budgeted expenses (including warranty costs associated with repairs of the Mooring) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project prior to the date of acceptance, and for iii) certain subsequently incurred non-budgeted costs and expenses.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for non-budgeted expenses (including warranty provisions, other non-budgeted expenses and replacement capital expenditure) of $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which were recorded as a contribution to equity. Indemnification payments received from Höegh LNG are subject to repayment to the extent the amounts are subsequently recovered from insurance or deemed reimbursable by the charterer.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to insurance proceeds received related to the warranty provision and costs for previous years determined to be reimbursable by the charterer. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $2.5 million related to previously recognized revenue from 2014 that was deemed reimbursable in 2017 and an additional cost recovery of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a cash distribution from equity. Refer to note 15.

 

Höegh Gallant claims and indemnification

 

In the third quarter of 2017, the Partnership began investigating with EgyptCo a performance measure included in EgyptCo’s charter with respect to the Höegh Gallant. The investigation included whether such a performance measure is directly linked to a specified performance standard which could result in a customer claim for reduced hire or damages and legal basis for a potential claim, if any. No accrual was recorded. In October 2018, EgyptCo reached an agreement with EgyptCo’s charterer that there would be no reduction in hire for this performance measure.

 

The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the time charter with EgyptCo (including technical issues) incurred in connection with the Höegh Gallant

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the time charter with EgyptCo of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 15.

  

19. Supplemental cash flow information

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities               
Non-cash expenditures for vessel and other equipment  $    (229)  $ 
Non-cash acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities           41,362 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities               
Non-cash revolving credit facility draw for the acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities  $       $41,362 

 

Refer to note 3 for Business combinations.

 

 F-64 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

20. Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units

 

From the commencement of the Prior ATM program in January 2018 through December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 2,025,590. Series A preferred units and 306,266 common units and received net proceeds of $51.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The compensation paid to the Agent for such sales was $1.0 million.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 53,160 common units at an average gross sales price of $19.6 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $1.0 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 496,520 Series A preferred units at an average gross sales price of $26.79 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $13.1 million. The Partnership has paid an aggregate of $0.2 million in sales commissions to the Agent in connection with such sales for the period ended December 31, 2019. Proceeds in the table below are included for all units issued for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

   Year ended December 31, 2019 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Common units   Series A Preferred
Units
   Total 
Gross proceeds for units issued  $1,042    13,298   $14,340 
Less: Commissions   (13)   (233)   (246)
Net proceeds for units issued  $1,029    13,065   $14,094 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership sold 253,106 common units at an average gross sales price of $18.26 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $4.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership sold 1,529,070 Series A preferred units at an average gross sales price of $25.74 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $38.7 million. The Partnership has paid an aggregate of $0.8 million in sales commissions to the Agent in connection with such sales for the period ended December 31, 2018. Proceeds in the table below are included for all units issued for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

    Year ended December 31, 2018  
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)   Common units     Series A
Preferred Units
    Total  
Gross proceeds for units issued   $ 4,623       39,360     $ 43,983  
Less: Commissions     (60 )     (701 )     (761 )
Net proceeds for units issued   $ 4,563       38,659     $ 43,222  

 

On October 5, 2017, the Partnership issued 4,600,000 8.75% Series A preferred units. The offering price was $25.0 per unit. The Partnership's total proceeds and net proceeds from the preferred unit offering were $115.0 million and $110.9 million, respectively. During October 2017, net proceeds of $34.4 million and $24.3 million were used to repay outstanding balances under the seller’s credit note and revolving credit facility, respectively. During December 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and settled part of the purchase price with cash of $45.3 million from the issuance of the Series A preferred units.

 

8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units:      

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  Year ended
December 31, 2017
 
Gross proceeds received  $115,000 
Less: Underwriters' discount   (3,623)
Less: Offering expenses   (453)
Net proceeds received  $110,924 

 

 F-65 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

21. Common, subordinated and preferred units

 

The following table shows the movements in the number of common units, subordinated units and preferred units during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

(in units)  Common
Units
Public
   Common
Units
Höegh
LNG
   Subordinated Units   8.75%
Series A Preferred
Units
 
December 31, 2016   17,639,039    2,116,060    13,156,060     
May 22, 2017; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees   9,805             
October 5, 2017; Series A preferred units offering               4,600,000 
December 31, 2017   17,648,844    2,116,060    13,156,060    4,600,000 
June 6, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees   8,840             
July 5, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees   2,210             
Units issued to staff at Höegh LNG during 2018   14,622    (14,622)        
Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2018   17,079             
ATM program (from January 26, 2018 to December 31, 2018)   253,106            1,529,070 
December 31, 2018   17,944,701    2,101,438    13,156,060    6,129,070 
June 4, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees   8,944             
July 16, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees   2,236             
August 16, 2019; Subordinated units converted to common units       13,156,060    (13,156,060)    
Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2019   19,745             
ATM program (from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019)   53,160            496,520 
December 31, 2019   18,028,786    15,257,498        6,625,590 

 

The subordination period, as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Höegh LNG Partners LP, for the subordinated units ended on August 16, 2019. All of the subordinated units, which were owned by Höegh LNG, converted to common units on a one-for-one basis. As of December 31, 2019, Höegh LNG owned 15,257,498 common units. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017 Höegh LNG owned 2,101,438 common units and 13,156,060 subordinated units.

 

Refer to note 22 for information on distributions to common and subordinated unitholders.

 

The Series A preferred units represent perpetual equity interests in the Partnership and, unlike the Partnership's debt, do not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. The Series A preferred units rank senior to the Partnership's common units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up but junior to all the Partnership's debt and other liabilities. The Series A preferred units have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. At any time on or after October 5, 2022, the Partnership may redeem, in whole or in part, the Series A preferred units at a redemption price of $25.00 per unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption. The distribution rate on the Series A preferred units is 8.75% per annum of the $25.00 per unit value (equivalent to $2.1875 per annum per unit). The distributions are cumulative and recorded when declared. However, since the Series A preferred units rank senior to the Partnership's common units, the portion of net income, equivalent to the Series A preferred units' paid and undeclared distributions for that period, is reflected as Preferred unitholders' interest in net income on the consolidated statement of income. Distributions are payable quarterly, when, and if declared by the Partnership's board of directors out of legally available funds for such purpose. Holders of the Series A preferred units generally have no voting rights. However, if and whenever distributions payable on the Series A preferred units are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Series A Preferred Units will be entitled to replace one of the members of the Partnership’s board of directors appointed by the general partner with a person nominated by such holders.

 

 F-66 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

22. Earning per unit and cash distributions

 

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit are presented below:

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per unit numbers)  2019   2018   2017 
Net income  $52,741    77,622   $59,190 
Adjustment for:               
Non-controlling interest           10,408 
Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income   13,850    12,303    2,480 
Limited partners' interest in net income   38,891    65,319    46,302 
Less: Dividends paid or to be paid (1)   (60,149)   (59,952)   (57,764)
Under (over) distributed earnings   (21,258)   5,367    (11,462)
Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:               
Common units public   (11,514)   2,900    (6,145)
Common units Höegh LNG   (3,211)   340    (736)
Subordinated units Höegh LNG   (6,533)   2,127    (4,581)
   $(21,258)   5,367   $(11,462)
Basic weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)               
Common units public   17,986    17,856    17,645 
Common units Höegh LNG   7,039    2,101    2,116 
Subordinated units Höegh LNG   8,218    13,156    13,156 
                
Diluted weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)               
Common units public   17,995    17,864    17,657 
Common units Höegh LNG   7,039    2,101    2,116 
Subordinated units Höegh LNG   8,218    13,156    13,156 
                
Basic and diluted earnings per unit (2):               
Common unit public  $1.12   $1.93   $1.37 
Common unit Höegh LNG (3)  $1.84   $2.03   $1.44 
Subordinated unit Höegh LNG (3)  $0.70   $2.03   $1.45 

 

(1) Includes all distributions paid or to be paid in relationship to the period, regardless of whether the declaration and payment dates were prior to the end of the period and is based the number of units outstanding at the period end.
(2) Effective March 21, 2019, granted 10,917 phantom units to the CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective March 23, 2018, the Partnership granted 14,584 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective June 3, 2016, the Partnership granted 21,500 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of December 31, 2017, November 30, 2018 and November 30, 2019, respectively. On September 14, 2018, the plan was amended to extend the terms and conditions of such unvested units for the grants effective March 23, 2017 and June 3, 2016 of the then-serving CEO/CFO that resigned as CEO/CFO of the Partnership. The phantom units impact the diluted weighted average units outstanding.  
(3) Includes total amounts attributable to incentive distributions rights of $1,597, $1,591 and $1,141 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $908, $219 and $158 was attributed to common units owned by Höegh LNG and $688, $1,372 and $983 was attributed to subordinated units owned by Höegh LNG, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(4) On August 16, 2019, all subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis.

 

 F-67 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Earnings per unit is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding during the applicable period. 

 

The common unitholders’ interest in net income is calculated as if all net income were distributed according to terms of the Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”), regardless of whether those earnings would or could be distributed. The Partnership Agreement does not provide for the distribution of net income; rather, it provides for the distribution of available cash. Available cash, a contractual defined term, generally means all cash on hand at the end of the quarter after deduction for cash reserves established by the board of directors and the Partnership’s subsidiaries to i) provide for the proper conduct of the business (including reserves for future capital expenditures and for the anticipated credit needs); ii) comply with applicable law, any of the debt instruments or other agreements; iii) provide funds for payments on the Series A preferred units; and iv) provide funds for distributions to the unitholders for any one or more of the next four quarters. Therefore, the earnings per unit are not indicative of future cash distributions that may be made. Unlike available cash, net income is affected by non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions.

 

In addition, Höegh LNG currently holds all the IDRs in the Partnership. IDRs represent the rights to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash for operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved.

  

Distributions of available cash from operating surplus are to be made among the unitholders and the holders of the IDRs in the following manner for any quarter after the subordination period: 

 

  · first, 100.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.388125 per unit for that quarter;

 

  · second, 85.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.421875 per unit for that quarter;

 

  · third, 75.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 25.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.50625 per unit for that quarter; and

  

  · thereafter, 50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata.

 

In each case, the percentage interests set forth above assume that the Partnership does not issue additional classes of equity securities.

 

 F-68 

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

 

23. Subsequent events

 

On February 15, 2020, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $15.0 million, or $0.44 per common unit, with respect to the three months ended December 31, 2019, equivalent to $1.76 per unit on an annualized basis.

 

On February 17, 2020, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $3.7 million, or $0.546875 per Series A preferred unit, for the period commencing on November 15, 2019 to February 14, 2020.

 

On February 27, 2020, the Partnership exercised the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. The Partnership intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

On March 26, 2020, the Partnership granted 8,100 phantom units to the CEO & CFO of the Partnership. One third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.

 

After the balance sheet date, we have seen significant macroeconomic uncertainty as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. The scale and duration of this development remains uncertain and could materially impact our earnings and cash flow.

 

On April 1, 2020, the joint ventures and the charterer signed final settlement and release agreements related to the boil-off claim. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 18 for additional information on the terms of the settlement.

 

 F-69 

 

 Exhibit 2.1

 

Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) has two classes of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each of which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), as set forth in the table below.

 

Title of Security Trading Symbol
Common units representing limited partner interests (“common units”) HMLP
8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units representing limited partner interests (“Series A Preferred Units”) HMLP PRA

 

The following description of the common units and the Series A Preferred Units does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the complete text of the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (referred to herein as our “partnership agreement”), a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 1.2 to this Annual Report on Form 20-F, and which is incorporated by reference herein.

 

DESCRIPTION OF OUR COMMON UNITS

 

General

 

Our common units represent limited partner interests in us. The holders of common units are entitled to participate in partnership distributions and exercise the rights and privileges available to limited partners under our partnership agreement. Please read the sections entitled “Our Partnership Agreement” and “Cash Distributions” below.

 

Voting Rights

 

Each holder of common units is entitled to one vote for each unit on all matters submitted to a vote of the common unitholders, subject to any limitations contained in our partnership agreement. See “Our Partnership Agreement—Voting Rights” below.

 

Cash Distributions; Liquidation

 

The holders of our common units are entitled to receive, to the extent permitted by law, such distributions as may from time to time be declared by our board of directors. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of our common units are entitled to receive distributions of our assets, after we have satisfied or made provision for our debts and other obligations and for payment to the holders any class or series of limited partner interests (including the Series A Preferred Units) having preferential rights to receive distributions of our assets. See “Our Partnership Agreement” and “Cash Distributions” below.

 

Transfer Agent and Registrar

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our common units is Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

 

OUR PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

 

Organization and Duration

 

We were organized on April 28, 2014 under the Marshall Islands Limited Partnership Act (the “Marshall Islands Act”) and have perpetual existence.

 

 

 

Purpose

 

Our purpose under our partnership agreement is to engage in any business activities that may lawfully be engaged in by a limited partnership pursuant to the Marshall Islands Act.

 

Cash Distributions

 

Our partnership agreement specifies the manner in which we will make cash distributions to holders of our common units and other partnership interests, including to the holders of our Series A Preferred Units and our incentive distribution rights. For a description of these cash distribution provisions, please read “Cash Distributions” below.

 

Capital Contributions

 

No holder of common units or Series A Preferred Units is obligated to make additional capital contributions, except as described below under “—Limited Liability.”

 

Transfer of Common Units and Series A Preferred Units

 

By transfer of common units or Series A Preferred Units in accordance with our partnership agreement, each transferee of common units or Series A Preferred Units automatically is admitted as a limited partner with respect to the common units or Series A Preferred Units transferred when such transfer and admission is reflected in our books and records. Each transferee automatically is deemed to:

 

(1)represent that the transferee has the capacity, power and authority to become bound by our partnership agreement;

 

(2)agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of, and to have executed, our partnership agreement; and

 

(3)give the consents, acknowledgments and waivers contained in our partnership agreement.

 

We may, at our discretion, treat the nominee holder of a common unit or Series A Preferred Unit as the absolute owner. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.

 

Common units and Series A Preferred Units are securities and are transferable according to the laws governing transfer of securities. In addition to other rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the transferee the right to become a limited partner in our partnership for the transferred units.

 

Until a common unit or Series A Preferred Unit has been transferred on our books, we and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.

 

Voting Rights

 

Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of common units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. We hold a meeting of our limited partners every year to elect one or more members of our board of directors and to vote on any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting. Common unitholders are entitled to elect only four of the seven members of our board of directors. The elected directors are elected on a staggered basis and serve for three-year terms. Subject to certain rights of the holders of Series A Preferred Units described below, our general partner in its sole discretion appoints the remaining three directors and set the terms for which those directors will serve. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well as other provisions limiting the unitholders’ ability to influence the manner or direction of management. Unitholders will have no right to elect our general partner, and our general partner may not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least 75% of the outstanding common units, including any common units owned by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class.

 

2

 

 

Each outstanding common unit is entitled to one vote on matters subject to a vote of common unitholders. However, to preserve our ability to claim an exemption from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if at any time any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any units beneficially owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes under our partnership agreement, unless otherwise required by law. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors. In addition to the common unitholders, this loss of voting rights also applies to the Series A Preferred Units.

 

In voting their common units or any Series A Preferred Units, our general partner and its affiliates will have no fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or the limited partners.

 

The following is a summary of the unitholder vote required for the approval of the matters specified below. Matters that require the approval of a “unit majority” require the approval of a majority of the outstanding common units voting as a single class.

 

Action

Unitholder Approval Required and Voting Rights

Issuance of additional units No approval rights, subject to the limited approval rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units as set forth below; general partner approval required for all issuances not reasonably expected to be accretive within 12 months of issuance or which would otherwise have a material adverse impact on our general partner or its interest in the Partnership.
Amendment of our partnership agreement Certain amendments may be made by our board of directors without the approval of the unitholders.  Other amendments generally require the approval of a unit majority.  Please read “— Amendment of Our Partnership Agreement.”  
Merger of the Partnership or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets Unit majority and approval of our general partner and our board of directors. Please read “— Merger, Sale, Conversion or Other Disposition of Assets.”  
Dissolution of the Partnership Unit majority and approval of our general partner and our board of directors. Please read “— Termination and Dissolution.”  
Reconstitution of the Partnership upon dissolution Unit majority.  Please read “— Termination and Dissolution.”  
Election of four of the seven members of our board of directors A plurality of the votes of the holders of the common units.
Withdrawal of our general partner Under most circumstances, the approval of a majority of the common units, excluding common units held by our general partner and its affiliates, is required for the withdrawal of our general partner prior to June 30, 2024 in a manner that would cause a dissolution of the Partnership. Please read “— Withdrawal or Removal of our General Partner.”

 

3

 

 

Removal of our general partner Not less than 75% of the outstanding common units, including common units held by our general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single class.  Please read “— Withdrawal or Removal of our General Partner.”
Transfer of our general partner interest in us Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest in us without a vote of our unitholders to an affiliate or another person in connection with its merger or consolidation with or into, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets to such person.  The approval of a majority of the common units, excluding common units held by our general partner and its affiliates, is required in other circumstances for a transfer of the general partner interest to a third party prior to June 30, 2024.  Please read “— Transfer of General Partner Interest.”
Transfer of incentive distribution rights No approval required.
Transfer of ownership interests in our general partner No approval required at any time.  Please read “— Transfer of Ownership Interests in General Partner.” However, during the term of the shareholders’ agreement governing the Joint Ventures, Höegh LNG is required to continue to directly or indirectly maintain the ability to control our general partner pursuant to an agreement with MOL.

 

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units generally have no voting rights. However, the consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units, voting as a single class, is required prior to any amendment to our partnership agreement that would have a material adverse effect on the existing terms of the Series A Preferred Units. In addition, unless we receive the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units, voting as a class together with holders of any other class or series of limited partnership interests or other equity securities established after the original issue date of the Series A Preferred Units with terms expressly providing that such class or series ranks on a parity with the Series A Preferred Units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary (“Parity Securities”), we may not (i) issue any Parity Securities if the cumulative distributions on Series A Preferred Units are in arrears or (ii) create or issue any other class or series of limited partner interests or other equity securities expressly made senior to the Series A Preferred Units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary (“Senior Securities”). In addition, if and whenever distributions payable on the Series A Preferred Units are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive (a “Trigger Event”), holders of Series A Preferred Units (voting together as a class with all other classes or series of Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will be entitled to replace one of the members of our board of directors appointed by our general partner with a person nominated by such holders (unless the holders of Series A Preferred Units and Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred, voting as a class, have previously elected a member of our board of directors, and such director continues then to serve on the board of directors). Distributions payable on the Series A Preferred Units will be considered to be in arrears for any quarterly period for which full cumulative distributions through the most recent distribution payment date have not been paid on all outstanding Series A Preferred Units.

 

4

 

 

The right of such holders of Series A Preferred Units to elect a member of our board of directors will continue until such time as all distributions accumulated and in arrears on the Series A Preferred Units have been paid in full, or funds for the payment thereof have been declared and set aside, at which time such right will terminate, subject to revesting in the event of each and every subsequent failure to pay six quarterly distributions as described above. Upon any termination of the right of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units and any other Parity Securities to vote as a class for such director, the term of office of such director then in office elected by such holders voting as a class will terminate immediately. Any director elected by the holders of the Series A Preferred Units and any other Parity Securities shall be entitled to one vote on any matter before our board of directors.

 

Unless we have received the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units, voting as a single class, our board of directors may not adopt any amendment to our partnership agreement that has a material adverse effect on the existing terms of the Series A Preferred Units.

 

In addition, unless we have received the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units, voting as a class together with holders of any other Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, we may not:

 

·issue any Parity Securities if the cumulative distributions payable on outstanding Series A Preferred Units are in arrears; or

 

 

 

·create or issue any Senior Securities.

 

On any matter described above in which the holders of the Series A Preferred Units are entitled to vote as a class, such holders will be entitled to one vote per outstanding Series A Preferred Unit. The Series A Preferred Units held by us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates will not be entitled to vote.

 

To preserve our ability to claim an exemption from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the Code, if at any time any person or group owns beneficially more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, any units beneficially owned by that person or group in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes under our partnership agreement, unless otherwise required by law. This loss of voting rights also applies to the Series A Preferred Units.

 

Applicable Law; Forum, Venue and Jurisdiction

 

Our partnership agreement is governed by Marshall Islands law. Our partnership agreement requires that any claims, suits, actions or proceedings:

 

·arising out of or relating in any way to our partnership agreement (including any claims, suits or actions to interpret, apply or enforce the provisions of our partnership agreement or the duties, obligations or liabilities among limited partners or of limited partners to us, or the rights or powers of, or restrictions on, our limited partners or us);

 

·brought in a derivative manner on our behalf;

 

·asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of us or our general partner, or owed by our general partner, to us or our limited partners;

 

·asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Marshall Islands Act; and

 

·asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine

 

shall be exclusively brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, unless otherwise provided for in the Marshall Islands Act, in each case regardless of whether such claims, suits, actions or proceedings arise under laws relating to contract, tort, fraud or otherwise, are based on common law, statutory, equitable, legal or other grounds, or are derivative or direct claims. By purchasing a unit, a limited partner is irrevocably consenting to these limitations and provisions regarding claims, suits, actions or proceedings and submitting to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, unless otherwise provided for in the Marshall Islands Act, in connection with any such claims, suits, actions or proceedings; however, a court could rule that such provisions are inapplicable or unenforceable.

 

5

 

 

Limited Liability

 

Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the control of our business within the meaning of the Marshall Islands Act and that he otherwise acts in conformity with the provisions of our partnership agreement, his liability under the Marshall Islands Act will be limited, subject to possible exceptions, to the amount of capital he is obligated to contribute to us for his common units plus his share of any undistributed profits and assets. If it were determined, however, that the right, or exercise of the right, by our limited partners as a group:

 

·to remove or replace our general partner;

 

·to elect four of our seven directors;

 

·to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement; or

 

·to take other action under our partnership agreement;

 

constituted “participation in the control” of our business for the purposes of the Marshall Islands Act, then our limited partners could be held personally liable for our obligations under the laws of the Marshall Islands, to the same extent as our general partner. This liability would extend to persons who transact business with us who reasonably believe that the limited partner is a general partner. Neither our partnership agreement nor the Marshall Islands Act specifically provides for legal recourse against our general partner if a limited partner were to lose limited liability through any fault of our general partner. While this does not mean that a limited partner could not seek legal recourse, we know of no precedent for this type of a claim in Marshall Islands case law.

 

Under the Marshall Islands Act, a limited partnership may not make a distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities to partners on account of their partnership interests and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specific property of the limited partnership, would exceed the fair value of the assets of the limited partnership. For the purpose of determining the fair value of the assets of a limited partnership, the Marshall Islands Act provides that the fair value of property subject to liability for which recourse of creditors is limited shall be included in the assets of the limited partnership only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds the non-recourse liability. The Marshall Islands Act provides that a limited partner who receives a distribution and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution was in violation of the Marshall Islands Act shall be liable to the limited partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years. Under the Marshall Islands Act, a purchaser of units who becomes a limited partner of a limited partnership is liable for the obligations of the transferor to make contributions to the limited partnership, except that the transferee is not obligated for liabilities unknown to him at the time he became a limited partner and that could not be ascertained from our partnership agreement.

 

Maintenance of our limited liability may require compliance with legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries conduct business, which may include qualifying to do business in those jurisdictions. Limitations on the liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited partnership or limited liability company have not been clearly established in many jurisdictions. If, by virtue of our membership interest in an operating subsidiary or otherwise, it were determined that we were conducting business in any jurisdiction without compliance with the applicable limited partnership or limited liability company statute, or that the right or exercise of the right by our limited partners as a group to remove or replace our general partner, to approve some amendments to our partnership agreement, or to take other action under our partnership agreement constituted “participation in the control” of our business for purposes of the statutes of any relevant jurisdiction, then our limited partners could be held personally liable for our obligations under the law of that jurisdiction to the same extent as our general partner under the circumstances. We will operate in a manner that our board of directors considers reasonable and necessary or appropriate to preserve the limited liability of our limited partners.

 

6

 

 

Issuance of Additional Interests

 

Our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited amount of additional partnership interests and rights to buy partnership interests for the consideration and on the terms and conditions determined by our board of directors without the approval of our unitholders, other than the limited approval rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units and the holders of other Parity Securities, if any, with regard to the issuance of Parity Securities and Senior Securities described above under “—Voting Rights.” However, our general partner will be required to approve all issuances of additional partnership interests that are not reasonably expected to be accretive within 12 months of issuance or which would otherwise have a material adverse impact on the general partner or its interest in us.

 

In accordance with Marshall Islands law and the provisions of our partnership agreement, we may also issue additional partnership interests that, as determined by our board of directors, have special voting rights to which our common units and Series A Preferred Units are not entitled.

 

Our general partner and its affiliates will have the right, which our general partner may from time to time assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates, to purchase common units or other equity securities whenever, and on the same terms that, we issue those securities to persons other than our general partner and its affiliates, to the extent necessary to maintain its and its affiliates’ percentage interest, including its interest represented by common units, that existed immediately prior to each issuance. Other unitholders will not have similar preemptive rights to acquire additional common units or other partnership interests.

 

Tax Status

 

The Partnership has elected to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Amendment of Our Partnership Agreement

 

General

 

Amendments to our partnership agreement may be proposed only by or with the consent of our board of directors. However, our board of directors has no duty or obligation to propose any amendment and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or our limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment, other than the amendments discussed below, approval of our board of directors is required, as well as written approval of the holders of the number of units required to approve the amendment or call a meeting of the limited partners to consider and vote upon the proposed amendment. In addition, holders of Series A Preferred Units must approve certain amendments as described above under “—Voting Rights.” Except as we describe below, or for amendments that require Series A Preferred Unit approval or approval of Series A Preferred Units voting as a class together with any other Parity Securities, an amendment must be approved by a unit majority.

 

Prohibited Amendments

 

No amendment may be made that would:

 

(1)increase the obligations of any limited partner without its consent, unless approved by at least a majority of the type or class of limited partner interests so affected;

 

(2)increase the obligations of, restrict in any way any action by or rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts distributable, reimbursable or otherwise payable by us to our general partner or any of its affiliates without the consent of our general partner, which may be given or withheld at its option;

 

(3)change the term of the Partnership;

 

(4)provide that the Partnership is not dissolved upon an election to dissolve the Partnership by our general partner and our board of directors that is approved by the holders of a unit majority; or

 

(5)give any person the right to dissolve the Partnership other than the right of our general partner and our board of directors to dissolve the Partnership with the approval of the holders of a unit majority.

 

7

 

 

The provision of our partnership agreement preventing the amendments having the effects described in clauses (1) through (5) above can be amended upon the approval of the holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting together as a single class (including units owned by our general partner and its affiliates).

 

No Unitholder Approval

 

Our board of directors may generally make amendments to our partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner to reflect:

 

(1)a change in our name, the location of our principal place of business, our registered agent or our registered office;

 

(2)the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of partners in accordance with our partnership agreement;

 

(3)a change that our board of directors determines to be necessary or appropriate for us to qualify or to continue our qualification as a limited partnership or a partnership in which our limited partners have limited liability under the Marshall Islands Act;

 

(4)an amendment that is necessary, upon the advice of our counsel, to prevent us or our officers or directors or our general partner or their or its agents, or trustees from in any manner being subjected to the provisions of the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the U.S. Investment Advisors Act of 1940, as amended, or plan asset regulations adopted under the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, whether or not substantially similar to plan asset regulations currently applied or proposed;

 

(5)subject to the limited approval rights of holders of Series A Preferred Units and the holders of other Parity Securities, if any, described above under “—Voting Rights,” an amendment that our board of directors determines to be necessary or appropriate for the authorization of additional partnership interests or rights to acquire partnership interests, including any amendment that our board of directors determines is necessary or appropriate in connection with:

 

·the adjustments of the minimum quarterly distribution, first target distribution, second target distribution and third target distribution in connection with the reset of our incentive distribution rights;

 

·the implementation of the provisions relating to Höegh LNG’s right to reset the incentive distribution rights in exchange for common units; or

 

·any modification of the incentive distribution rights made in connection with the issuance of additional partnership interests or rights to acquire partnership interests, provided that, any such modifications and related issuance of partnership interests have received approval by a majority of the members of the conflicts committee of our board of directors;

 

(6)any amendment expressly permitted in our partnership agreement to be made by our board of directors acting alone;

 

(7)an amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger agreement that has been approved under the terms of our partnership agreement;

 

(8)any amendment that our board of directors determines to be necessary or appropriate for the formation by us of, or our investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, as otherwise permitted by our partnership agreement;

 

(9)a change in our fiscal year or taxable year and related changes;

 

(10)certain conversions, mergers or conveyances as set forth in our partnership agreement; or

 

8

 

 

(11)any other amendments substantially similar to any of the matters described in clauses (1) through (10) above.

 

In addition, our board of directors may make amendments to our partnership agreement without the approval of any limited partner (subject to the limited approval rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units and the holders of other Parity Securities, if any, described above under “—Voting Rights”) or our general partner if our board of directors determines that those amendments:

 

(1)do not adversely affect our limited partners (or any particular class of limited partners) or our general partner in any material respect;

 

(2)are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any requirements, conditions, or guidelines contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or regulation of any Marshall Islands authority or statute;

 

(3)are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading of limited partner interests or to comply with any rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange on which the limited partner interests are or will be listed for trading;

 

(4)are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by our board of directors relating to splits or combinations of units under the provisions of our partnership agreement; or

 

(5)are required to effect the intent expressed in the registration statement for our initial public offering or the intent of the provisions of our partnership agreement or are otherwise contemplated by our partnership agreement.

 

Opinion of Counsel and Unitholder Approval

 

Our board of directors will not be required to obtain an opinion of counsel that an amendment will not result in a loss of limited liability to our limited partners if one of the amendments described above under “—Amendment of Our Partnership Agreement—No Unitholder Approval” should occur. No other amendments to our partnership agreement will become effective without the approval of holders of at least 90% of the outstanding units voting as a single class unless we obtain an opinion of counsel to the effect that the amendment will not affect the limited liability under applicable law of any of our limited partners.

 

In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the rights or privileges of any type or class of outstanding units (other than Series A Preferred Units) in relation to other classes of units will require the approval of at least a majority of the type or class of units so affected; provided, however, that any amendment that would have a material adverse effect on the existing terms of the Series A Preferred Units will require the approval of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units. Any amendment that reduces the voting percentage required to take any action must be approved by the affirmative vote of limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute not less than the voting requirement sought to be reduced.

 

Merger, Sale, Conversion or Other Disposition of Assets

 

A merger or consolidation of us requires the approval of our board of directors and the prior consent of our general partner. However, to the fullest extent permitted by law, our board of directors and our general partner will have no duty or obligation to consent to any merger or consolidation and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us or our limited partners, including any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or our limited partners. In addition, our partnership agreement generally prohibits our board of directors, without the prior approval of our general partner and the holders of units representing a unit majority, from causing us to, among other things, sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, including by way of merger, consolidation or other combination, or approving on our behalf the sale, exchange, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of our subsidiaries taken as a whole. Our board of directors may, however, mortgage, pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in all or substantially all of our assets without the prior approval of the holders of units representing a unit majority. Our general partner and our board of directors may also determine to sell all or substantially all of our assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon those encumbrances without the approval of the holders of units representing a unit majority.

 

9

 

 

Our board of directors, with the consent of our general partner, may convert us or any of our subsidiaries into a new limited liability entity or merge us or any of our subsidiaries into, or convey some or all of our assets to, a newly formed entity if (i) our board of directors has received an opinion of counsel that the conversion, merger or conveyance, as the case may be, would not result in the loss of the limited liability of any limited partner, (ii) the sole purpose of such conversion, merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in our legal form into another limited liability entity and (iii) the governing instruments of the new entity provide the limited partners, our general partner and our board of directors with the same rights and obligations as are herein contained. The unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under our partnership agreement or applicable law in the event of a conversion, merger or consolidation, sale of substantially all of our assets or any other transaction or event.

 

Termination and Dissolution

 

We will continue as a limited partnership until terminated or converted under our partnership agreement. We will dissolve upon:

 

(1)the election of our general partner and our board of directors to dissolve us, if approved by the holders of a unit majority;

 

(2)at any time there are no limited partners, unless we continue without dissolution in accordance with the Marshall Islands Act;

 

(3)the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of us; or

 

(4)the withdrawal or removal of our general partner or any other event that results in its ceasing to be our general partner other than by reason of a transfer of its general partner interest in accordance with our partnership agreement or withdrawal or removal following approval and admission of a successor.

 

Upon a dissolution under clause (4), the holders of a unit majority may also elect, within specific time limitations, to continue our business on the same terms and conditions described in our partnership agreement by appointing as general partner an entity approved by the holders of a unit majority, subject to our receipt of an opinion of counsel to the effect that the action would not result in the loss of limited liability of any limited partner.

 

Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds

 

Upon our dissolution, unless we are continued as a new limited partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up our affairs will, acting with all of the powers of our board of directors that are necessary or appropriate, liquidate our assets and apply the proceeds of the liquidation as described in “Cash Distributions—Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation.” The liquidator may defer liquidation or distribution of our assets for a reasonable period or distribute assets to partners in kind if it determines that a sale would be impractical or would cause undue loss to our partners.

 

Withdrawal or Removal of our General Partner

 

Except as described below, our general partner has agreed not to withdraw voluntarily as our general partner prior to June 30, 2024 without obtaining the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding common units held by our general partner and its affiliates, and furnishing an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability. On or after June 30, 2024, our general partner may withdraw as general partner without first obtaining approval of any unitholder by giving 90 days’ written notice, and that withdrawal will not constitute a violation of our partnership agreement. Notwithstanding the information above, our general partner may withdraw without unitholder approval upon 90 days’ written notice to our limited partners if at least 50% of the outstanding common units are held or controlled by one person and its affiliates other than our general partner and its affiliates. In addition, our partnership agreement permits our general partner in some instances to sell or otherwise transfer its general partner interest in us without the approval of the unitholders. Please read “—Transfer of General Partner Interest” and “—Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights.”

 

10

 

 

Upon withdrawal of our general partner under any circumstances, other than as a result of a transfer by our general partner of its general partner interest in us, the holders of a majority of the outstanding common units may select a successor to that withdrawing general partner. If a successor is not elected or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability cannot be obtained, we will be dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless within a specified period of time after that withdrawal, the holders of a unit majority agree in writing to continue our business and to appoint a successor general partner. Please read “—Termination and Dissolution.”

 

Our general partner may not be removed unless that removal is approved by the vote of the holders of not less than 75% of the outstanding common units, including common units held by our general partner and its affiliates, and we receive an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability. Any removal of our general partner is also subject to the successor general partner being approved by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding common units.

 

Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general partner is removed as our general partner under circumstances where cause does not exist and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal the holder of the incentive distribution rights will have the right to convert such incentive distribution rights into common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests based on the fair market value of those interests at the time

 

In the event of removal of our general partner under circumstances where cause exists or withdrawal of our general partner where that withdrawal violates our partnership agreement, a successor general partner will have the option to purchase the general partner interest owned by the departing general partner for a cash payment equal to the fair market value of that interest. Under all other circumstances where our general partner withdraws or is removed by our limited partners, the departing general partner will have the option to require the successor general partner to purchase the general partner interest of the departing general partner for its fair market value. In each case, this fair market value will be determined by agreement between the departing general partner and the successor general partner. If no agreement is reached, an independent investment banking firm or other independent expert selected by the departing general partner and the successor general partner will determine the fair market value. Or, if the departing general partner and the successor general partner cannot agree upon an expert, then an expert chosen by agreement of the experts selected by each of them will determine the fair market value.

 

If the option described above is not exercised by either the departing general partner or the successor general partner, the departing general partner’s general partner interest and the incentive distribution rights of any holder thereof will automatically convert into common units equal to the fair market value of those interests as determined by an independent investment banking firm or other independent expert selected in the manner described in the preceding paragraph.

 

In addition, we will be required to reimburse the departing general partner for all amounts due the departing general partner, including, without limitation, any employee-related liabilities, including severance liabilities, incurred for the termination of any employees employed by the departing general partner or its affiliates for our benefit.

 

Transfer of General Partner Interest

 

Except for the transfer by our general partner of all, but not less than all, of its general partner interest in us to:

 

·an affiliate of our general partner (other than an individual); or

 

·another entity as part of the merger or consolidation of our general partner with or into another entity or the transfer by our general partner of all or substantially all of its assets to another entity, our general partner may not transfer all or any part of its general partner interest in us to another person prior to June 30, 2024, without the approval of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common units, excluding common units held by our general partner and its affiliates. As a condition of this transfer, the transferee must, among other things, assume the rights and duties of the general partner, agree to be bound by the provisions of our partnership agreement and furnish an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability.

 

11

 

 

Our general partner and its affiliates may at any time transfer common units to one or more persons, without unitholder approval.

 

Transfer of Ownership Interests in General Partner

 

At any time, the members of our general partner may sell or transfer all or part of their respective membership interests in our general partner to an affiliate or a third party without the approval of our unitholders. However, during the term of the shareholders’ agreement governing the Joint Ventures, Höegh LNG is required to continue to directly or indirectly maintain the ability to control our general partner pursuant to an agreement with MOL.

 

Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights

 

The incentive distribution rights are freely transferable.

 

Change of Management Provisions

 

Our partnership agreement contains specific provisions that are intended to discourage a person or group from attempting to remove Höegh LNG GP LLC as our general partner or otherwise change management. If any person or group acquires beneficial ownership of more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, that person or group loses voting rights on all of its units in excess of 4.9% of all such units. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors.

 

Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general partner is removed under circumstances where cause does not exist and units held by our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal our general partner’s non-economic general partner interest and the incentive distribution rights (initially owned by Höegh LNG) will be converted into cash or common units.

 

Limited Call Right

 

If at any time our general partner and its affiliates hold more than 80% of the then-issued and outstanding partnership interests of any class or series, except for the Series A Preferred Units, our general partner will have the right, which it may assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the remaining partnership interests of the class or series held by unaffiliated persons as of a record date to be selected by our general partner, on at least 10 but not more than 60 days’ written notice at a price equal to the greater of (x) the average of the daily closing prices of the partnership interests of such class or series over the 20 trading days preceding the date three days before the notice of exercise of the call right is first mailed and (y) the highest price paid by our general partner or any of its affiliates for partnership interests of such class or series during the 90-day period preceding the date such notice is first mailed. Our general partner is not obligated to obtain a fairness opinion regarding the value of the common units to be repurchased by it upon the exercise of this limited call right and has no fiduciary duty in determining whether to exercise this limited call right.

 

As a result of our general partner’s right to purchase outstanding partnership interests, a holder of partnership interests (except for the Series A Preferred Units) may have the holder’s partnership interests purchased at an undesirable time or price.

 

Board of Directors

 

Under our partnership agreement, our general partner has irrevocably delegated to our board of directors the authority to oversee and direct our operations, policies and management on an exclusive basis, and such delegation will be binding on any successor general partner of the partnership. Our board of directors currently consists of seven members, three of whom are appointed by our general partner in its sole discretion and four of whom are elected by our common unitholders.

 

12

 

 

Our board of directors nominates individuals to stand for election as elected board members on a staggered basis at an annual meeting of our limited partners. In addition, any limited partner or group of limited partners that holds beneficially 10% or more of the outstanding common units is entitled to nominate one or more individuals to stand for election as elected board members at the annual meeting by providing written notice to our board of directors not more than 120 days nor less than 90 days prior to the meeting. However, if the date of the annual meeting is not publicly announced by us at least 100 days prior to the date of the meeting, the notice must be delivered to our board of directors not later than 10 days following the public announcement of the meeting date. The notice must set forth:

 

·the name and address of the limited partner or limited partners making the nomination or nominations;

 

·the number of common units beneficially owned by the limited partner or limited partners;

 

·the information regarding the nominee(s) proposed by the limited partner or limited partners as required to be included in a proxy statement relating to the solicitation of proxies for the election of directors filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”);

 

·the written consent of the nominee(s) to serve as a member of our board of directors if so elected; and

 

·a certification that the nominee(s) qualify as elected board members.

 

Upon a Trigger Event, the holders of Series A Preferred Units (together with holders of all other classes or series of Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will have the right to replace one of the members of our board of directors appointed by our general partner with a member nominated by such holders (“Holders’ Nominee”), such nominee to serve until the payment of all accrued and unpaid distributions in respect of the Series A Preferred Units and such Parity Securities has been made. Upon payment of all accrued and unpaid distributions then outstanding in respect of the Series A Preferred Units and such Parity Securities, the Holders’ Nominee will agree to resign from the board, effective immediately, unless and until a subsequent Trigger Event, if any, occurs. Subject to the preceding sentence, any Holders’ Nominee may be removed at any time without cause only by the holders of a majority of the Series A Preferred Units and the holders of any other series of such Parity Securities, voting together as a class. If any Holders’ Nominee is removed, resigns or is otherwise unable to serve as a member of the board of directors, the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units and, if applicable, any other Parity Securities, voting together as a class, shall appoint an individual to fill the vacancy.

 

Subject to the rights of the holders of the Series A Preferred Units with regard to the Holders’ Nominee, our general partner may remove an appointed board member with or without cause at any time. “Cause” generally means a court’s finding a person liable for actual fraud or willful misconduct in his or its capacity as a director. Any and all of the board members may be removed at any time for cause by the affirmative vote of a majority of the other board members. Any and all of the board members appointed by our general partner may be removed for cause at a properly called meeting of our limited partners by a majority vote of the outstanding units, voting as a single class. If any appointed board member is removed, resigns or is otherwise unable to serve as a board member, our general partner may fill the vacancy. Any and all of the board members elected by the common unitholders may be removed for cause at a properly called meeting of our limited partners by a majority vote of the outstanding common units. If any elected board member is removed, resigns or is otherwise unable to serve as a board member, the vacancy may be filled by a majority of the other elected board members then serving.

 

Meetings; Voting

 

Except as described under “—Voting Rights” regarding a person or group owning more than 4.9% of any class of units then outstanding, unitholders who are record holders of units on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, meetings of our limited partners and to act upon matters for which approvals may be solicited.

 

Holders of the Series A Preferred Units have limited voting rights as set forth under “—Voting Rights.”

 

We hold a meeting of our limited partners every year to elect one or more members of our board of directors and to vote on any other matters that are properly brought before the meeting. Any action that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may be taken either at a meeting of the unitholders or without a meeting if consents in writing describing the action so taken are signed by holders of the number of units necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting. Special meetings of the unitholders may be called by our general partner, board of directors or by unitholders owning at least 20% of the outstanding units of the class or series for which a meeting is proposed. Unitholders may vote either in person or by proxy at meetings. The holders of 33 1/3% of the outstanding units of the class or classes or series for which a meeting has been called, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum unless any action by the unitholders requires approval by holders of a greater percentage of the units, in which case the quorum will be the greater percentage.

 

13

 

 

Each record holder of a unit may vote according to the holder’s percentage interest in us, although additional limited partner interests having special voting rights could be issued. Please read “—Issuance of Additional Interests.” However, to preserve our ability to claim an exemption from U.S. federal income tax under Section 883 of the Code, if at any time any person or group acquires, in the aggregate, beneficial ownership of more than 4.9% of all units then outstanding, that person or group will lose voting rights on all of its units in excess of 4.9% of all such units and those units in excess of 4.9% may not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders, calculating required votes (except for purposes of nominating a person for election to our board of directors), determining the presence of a quorum or for other similar purposes. The voting rights of any such unitholders in excess of 4.9% will effectively be redistributed pro rata among the other unitholders holding less than 4.9% of the voting power of all classes of units entitled to vote. Our general partner, its affiliates and persons who acquired common units with the prior approval of our board of directors will not be subject to this 4.9% limitation except with respect to voting their common units in the election of the elected directors. This loss of voting rights also applies to the Series A Preferred Units. Units held in nominee or street name account will be voted by the broker or other nominee in accordance with the instruction of the beneficial owner unless the arrangement between the beneficial owner and his nominee provides otherwise.

 

Status as Limited Partner or Assignee

 

Except as described above under “—Limited Liability,” the common units and Series A Preferred Units will be fully paid, and unitholders will not be required to make additional contributions. By transfer of common units and Series A Preferred Units in accordance with our partnership agreement, each transferee of units will be admitted as a limited partner with respect to the units transferred when such transfer and admission is reflected in our books and records.

 

Indemnification

 

Under our partnership agreement, in most circumstances, we will indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar events:

 

(1)our general partner;

 

(2)any departing general partner;

 

(3)any person who is or was an affiliate of our general partner or any departing general partner;

 

(4)any person who is or was an officer, director, general partner, managing member, fiduciary or trustee of any entity described in clauses (1), (2) or (3) above;

 

(5)any person who is or was serving as a director, officer, partner, member, fiduciary or trustee of another person at the request of our general partner or any departing general partner or any of their affiliates;

 

(6)our officers;

 

(7)any person designated by our board of directors; and

 

(8)the members of our board of directors.

 

Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of our assets. We may purchase insurance against liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the power to indemnify the person against liabilities under our partnership agreement.

 

14

 

 

Reimbursement of Expenses

 

Our partnership agreement requires us to reimburse the members of our board of directors for their out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred in the course of their service to us. Our partnership agreement also requires us to reimburse our general partner for all expenses it incurs or payments it makes on our behalf and all other expenses allocable to us or otherwise incurred by our general partner in connection with operating our business. These expenses include salary, bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to persons who perform services for us or on our behalf, and expenses allocated to us or our general partner by our board of directors.

 

Books and Reports

 

Our general partner is required to keep appropriate books and records of our business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained for both tax and financial reporting purposes on an accrual basis. For tax and financial reporting purposes, our fiscal year is the calendar year.

 

We will furnish or make available to record holders of common units, within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year, an annual report containing audited financial statements and a report on those financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm. Except for our fourth quarter, we will also furnish or make available summary historical financial information within 90 days after the close of each quarter.

 

Right to Inspect Our Books and Records

 

Our partnership agreement provides that a limited partner can, for a purpose reasonably related to his interest as a limited partner, upon reasonable written demand stating the purpose of such demand and at the limited partner’s own expense, have furnished to the limited partner:

 

(1)a current list of the name and last known address of each partner;

 

(2)information as to the amount of cash, and a description and statement of the agreed value of any other property or services, contributed or to be contributed by each partner and the date on which each became a partner;

 

(3)copies of our partnership agreement, the certificate of limited partnership of the Partnership, and related amendments;

 

(4)information regarding the status of our business and financial position; and

 

(5)any other information regarding our affairs as is just and reasonable.

 

Our board of directors may, and intends to, keep confidential from our limited partners trade secrets or other information the disclosure of which our board of directors believes in good faith is not in our best interests or that we are required by law or by agreements with third parties to keep confidential.

 

Registration Rights

 

Under our partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and applicable state securities laws any common units or other partnership interests proposed to be sold by our general partner or any of its affiliates or their assignees if an exemption from the registration requirements is not otherwise available or advisable. These registration rights continue for two years following any withdrawal or removal of Höegh LNG GP LLC as our general partner. We are obligated to pay all expenses incidental to the registration, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions. In connection with these registration rights, we will not be required to pay any damages or penalties related to any delay or failure to file a registration statement or to cause a registration statement to become effective.

 

15

 

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE SERIES A PREFERRED UNITS

 

General

 

The Series A Preferred Units entitle the holders thereof to receive cumulative cash distributions when, as and if declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds for such purpose. The Series A Preferred Units represent perpetual equity interests in us and, unlike our indebtedness, do not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. See “Our Partnership Agreement” and “Cash Distributions” for more information.

 

Ranking

 

The Series A Preferred Units, with respect to anticipated quarterly distributions and distributions upon the liquidation, winding-up and dissolution of our affairs, rank:

 

·senior to the common units and other classes or series of limited partner interests or other equity securities that are not expressly made senior to or on parity with the Series A Preferred Units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up (“Junior Securities”);

 

·on a parity with Parity Securities;

 

·junior to all of our indebtedness and other liabilities with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against us; and

 

·junior to any class or series of Senior Securities.

 

We may, without notice to or consent of the holders of the then-outstanding Series A Preferred Units, authorize and issue additional Series A Preferred Units and Junior Securities and, subject to the limitations described under “Our Partnership Agreement—Voting Rights,” Senior Securities and Parity Securities.

 

Liquidation Rights

 

The holders of outstanding Series A Preferred Units are entitled, in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, whether voluntary or involuntary, to receive the liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit in cash plus an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date fixed for payment of such amount (whether or not declared), and no more, before any distribution will be made to the holders of our common units or any other Junior Securities. A consolidation or merger of us with or into any other entity, individually or in a series of transactions, will not be deemed a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs for this purpose. In the event that our assets available for distribution to holders of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units and any other Parity Securities are insufficient to permit payment of all required amounts, our assets then remaining will be distributed among the Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities, as applicable, ratably on the basis of their relative aggregate liquidation preferences. After payment of all required amounts to the holders of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units and other Parity Securities, our remaining assets and funds will be distributed among the holders of the common units and any other Junior Securities then outstanding according to their respective rights.

 

Voting Rights

 

See “Our Partnership Agreement—Voting Rights” for a description of the voting rights of the Series A Preferred Units.

 

Distributions

 

Distribution Rate

 

Distributions on Series A Preferred Units are cumulative, commencing on October 5, 2017 (the “Series A Original Issue Date”) in the case of the 4,600,000 Series A Preferred Units outstanding as of such date (or, for any subsequently issued and newly outstanding Series A Preferred Units, from the Distribution Payment Date immediately preceding the issuance date of such units), and payable on each Distribution Payment Date, when, as and if declared by our board of directors or any authorized committee thereof out of legally available funds for such purpose. Distributions on the Series A Preferred Units accrue at a rate of 8.75% per annum per $25.00 stated liquidation preference per Series A Preferred Unit.

 

16

 

 

Distribution Payment Dates

 

The “Distribution Payment Dates” for the Series A Preferred Units are each February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15. Distributions will accumulate in each distribution period from and including the preceding Distribution Payment Date or the Series A Original Issue Date, as the case may be, to but excluding the applicable Distribution Payment Date for such distribution period, and distributions will accrue on accumulated distributions at the rate of 8.75% per annum. If any Distribution Payment Date otherwise would fall on a day that is not a Business Day, declared distributions will be paid on the immediately succeeding Business Day without the accumulation of additional distributions. Distributions on the Series A Preferred Units will be payable based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. “Business Day” means a day on which The New York Stock Exchange is open for trading and which is not a Saturday, a Sunday or other day on which banks in New York City are authorized or required by law to close.

 

Payment of Distributions

 

Not later than the close of business, New York City time, on each Distribution Payment Date, we will pay those distributions, if any, on the Series A Preferred Units that have been declared by our board of directors to the holders of such units as such holders’ names appear on our unit transfer books maintained by the Registrar and Transfer Agent on the applicable record date (“Record Date”). The applicable Record Date will be the fifth Business Day immediately preceding the applicable Distribution Payment Date, except that in the case of payments of distributions in arrears, the Record Date with respect to a Distribution Payment Date will be such date as may be designated by our board of directors in accordance with our partnership agreement, as amended.

 

So long as the Series A Preferred Units are held of record by the nominee of the Securities Depository, declared distributions will be paid to the Securities Depository in same-day funds on each Distribution Payment Date. The Securities Depository will credit accounts of its participants in accordance with the Securities Depository’s normal procedures. The participants will be responsible for holding or disbursing such payments to beneficial owners of the Series A Preferred Units in accordance with the instructions of such beneficial owners.

 

No distribution may be declared or paid or set apart for payment on any Junior Securities (other than a distribution payable solely in units of Junior Securities) unless full cumulative distributions have been or contemporaneously are being paid or provided for on all outstanding Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities through the most recent respective Distribution Payment Dates. Accumulated distributions in arrears for any past distribution period may be declared by our board of directors and paid on any date fixed by our board of directors, whether or not a Distribution Payment Date, to holders of the Series A Preferred Units on the Record Date for such payment, which may not be more than 60 days, nor less than 15 days, before such payment date. Subject to the next succeeding sentence, if all accumulated distributions in arrears on all outstanding Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities have not been declared and paid, or sufficient funds for the payment thereof have not been set apart, payment of accumulated distributions in arrears will be made in order of their respective Distribution Payment Dates, commencing with the earliest. If less than all distributions payable with respect to all Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities are paid, any partial payment will be made pro rata with respect to the Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities entitled to a distribution payment at such time in proportion to the aggregate amounts remaining due in respect of such units at such time. Holders of the Series A Preferred Units are not entitled to any distribution, whether payable in cash, property or units, in excess of full cumulative distributions. Except insofar as distributions accrue on the amount of any accumulated and unpaid distributions as described under “—Distributions—Distribution Rate,” no interest or sum of money in lieu of interest will be payable in respect of any distribution payment which may be in arrears on the Series A Preferred Units.

 

17

 

  

Redemption

 

Optional Redemption

 

Commencing on October 5, 2022, we may redeem, at our option, in whole or in part, the Series A Preferred Units at a redemption price in cash equal to $25.00 per unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption, whether or not declared. Any such optional redemption shall be effected only out of funds legally available for such purpose. We may undertake multiple partial redemptions.

 

Redemption Procedures

 

We will give notice of any redemption by mail, postage prepaid, not less than 30 days and not more than 60 days before the scheduled date of redemption, to the holders of any units to be redeemed as such holders’ names appear on our unit transfer books maintained by the Registrar and Transfer Agent at the address of such holders shown therein. Such notice shall state: (1) the redemption date, (2) the number of Series A Preferred Units to be redeemed and, if less than all outstanding Series A Preferred Units are to be redeemed, the number (and the identification) of units to be redeemed from such holder, (3) the redemption price, (4) the place where the Series A Preferred Units are to be redeemed and shall be presented and surrendered for payment of the redemption price therefor and (5) that distributions on the units to be redeemed will cease to accumulate from and after such redemption date.

 

If fewer than all of the outstanding Series A Preferred Units are to be redeemed, the number of units to be redeemed will be determined by us, and such units will be redeemed by such method of selection as the Securities Depository shall determine, pro rata or by lot, with adjustments to avoid redemption of fractional units. So long as all Series A Preferred Units are held of record by the nominee of the Securities Depository, we will give notice, or cause notice to be given, to the Securities Depository of the number of Series A Preferred Units to be redeemed, and the Securities Depository will determine the number of Series A Preferred Units to be redeemed from the account of each of its participants holding such units in its participant account. Thereafter, each participant will select the number of units to be redeemed from each beneficial owner for whom it acts (including the participant, to the extent it holds Series A Preferred Units for its own account). A participant may determine to redeem Series A Preferred Units from some beneficial owners (including the participant itself) without redeeming Series A Preferred Units from the accounts of other beneficial owners.

 

So long as the Series A Preferred Units are held of record by the nominee of the Securities Depository, the redemption price will be paid by the Paying Agent to the Securities Depository on the redemption date. The Securities Depository’s normal procedures provide for it to distribute the amount of the redemption price in same-day funds to its participants who, in turn, are expected to distribute such funds to the persons for whom they are acting as agent.

 

If we give or cause to be given a notice of redemption, then we will deposit with the Paying Agent funds sufficient to redeem the Series A Preferred Units as to which notice has been given by the close of business, New York City time, no later than the Business Day immediately preceding the date fixed for redemption, and will give the Paying Agent irrevocable instructions and authority to pay the redemption price to the holder or holders thereof upon surrender or deemed surrender (which will occur automatically if the certificate representing such units is issued in the name of the Securities Depository or its nominee) of the certificates therefor. If notice of redemption shall have been given, then from and after the date fixed for redemption, unless we default in providing funds sufficient for such redemption at the time and place specified for payment pursuant to the notice, all distributions on such units will cease to accumulate and all rights of holders of such units as our unitholders will cease, except the right to receive the redemption price, including an amount equal to accumulated and unpaid distributions through the date fixed for redemption, whether or not declared. We will be entitled to receive from the Paying Agent the interest income, if any, earned on such funds deposited with the Paying Agent (to the extent that such interest income is not required to pay the redemption price of the units to be redeemed), and the holders of any units so redeemed will have no claim to any such interest income. Any funds deposited with the Paying Agent hereunder by us for any reason, including, but not limited to, redemption of Series A Preferred Units, that remain unclaimed or unpaid after two years after the applicable redemption date or other payment date, shall be, to the extent permitted by law, repaid to us upon our written request, after which repayment the holders of the Series A Preferred Units entitled to such redemption or other payment shall have recourse only to us.

 

18

 

 

If only a portion of the Series A Preferred Units represented by a certificate has been called for redemption, upon surrender of the certificate to the Paying Agent (which will occur automatically if the certificate representing such units is registered in the name of the Securities Depository or its nominee), the Paying Agent will issue to the holder of such units a new certificate (or adjust the applicable book-entry account) representing the number of Series A Preferred Units represented by the surrendered certificate that have not been called for redemption.

 

Notwithstanding any notice of redemption, there will be no redemption of any Series A Preferred Units called for redemption until funds sufficient to pay the full redemption price of such units, including all accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption, whether or not declared, have been deposited by us with the Paying Agent.

 

We and our affiliates may from time to time purchase the Series A Preferred Units, subject to compliance with all applicable securities and other laws. Neither we nor any of our affiliates has any obligation, or any present plan or intention, to purchase any Series A Preferred Units.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that full cumulative distributions on the Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities have not been paid or declared and set apart for payment, we may not repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, in whole or in part, any Series A Preferred Units or Parity Securities except pursuant to a purchase or exchange offer made on the same terms to all holders of Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities. Common units and any other Junior Securities may not be redeemed, repurchased or otherwise acquired unless full cumulative distributions on the Series A Preferred Units and any Parity Securities for all prior and the then-ending distribution periods have been paid or declared and set apart for payment.

 

No Sinking Fund

 

The Series A Preferred Units do not have the benefit of any sinking fund.

 

No Fiduciary Duty

 

We, our general partner, and our officers and directors, do not owe any fiduciary duties to holders of the Series A Preferred Units other than a contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing pursuant to our partnership agreement.

 

Transfer Agent and Registrar

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our Series A Preferred Units is Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

 

CASH DISTRIBUTIONS

 

Distributions of Available Cash

 

General

 

Within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash (defined below) to common unitholders of record on the applicable record date.

 

In determining “available cash” and “operating surplus,” we proportionately consolidate our less than wholly owned subsidiaries, which for this purpose includes joint ventures, provided that such entities were formed for the purpose of owning and operating specified assets and meet certain other tests, and with respect to which we have at the time of determination at least a 20% beneficial interest and are either consolidated by us for accounting purposes or accounted for by us on the equity method.

 

Definition of Available Cash

 

Available cash generally means, for each fiscal quarter, all cash on hand at the end of the quarter (including our proportionate share of cash on hand of certain subsidiaries we do not wholly own):

 

·less, the amount of cash reserves (including our proportionate share of cash reserves of our subsidiaries) established by our board of directors and our subsidiaries to:

 

19

 

 

·provide for the proper conduct of our business (including reserves for future capital expenditures and for our anticipated credit needs);

 

·comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments, or other agreements;

 

·provide funds to pay quarterly distributions on, and to make any redemption payments relating to, the Series A Preferred Units; or

 

·provide funds for distributions to our common unitholders and to our general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;

 

·plus, all cash on hand (including our proportionate share of cash on hand of our subsidiaries) on the date of determination of available cash for the quarter resulting from (1) working capital borrowings made after the end of the quarter and (2) cash distributions received after the end of the quarter from any equity interest in any person (other than a subsidiary of us), which distributions are paid by such person in respect of operations conducted by such person during such quarter. Working capital borrowings are borrowings that are made under a credit facility, commercial paper facility or similar financing arrangement and in all cases are used solely for working capital purposes or to pay distributions to partners; provided that when such borrowing is incurred it is the intent of the borrower to repay such borrowings within twelve months from sources other than additional working capital borrowings.

 

Series A Preferred Units

 

The Series A Preferred Units rank senior to our common units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary. See “Description of the Series A Preferred Units—Distributions” above for more information.

 

Minimum Quarterly Distribution

 

Common unitholders are entitled under our partnership agreement to receive a on quarterly basis at least the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3375 per unit to the extent we have sufficient cash on hand to pay the distribution, after we establish cash reserves and pay fees and expenses. There is no guarantee that we will pay the minimum quarterly distribution on the common units in any quarter. Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount of distributions paid under our policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined by our board of directors, taking into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement. Additionally, we will be prohibited from making any distributions to our common unitholders if it would cause an event of default, or if an event of default is then existing, under our financing agreements, or if full cumulative distributions have not been paid or are not contemporaneously being paid on all outstanding Series A Preferred Units, through the most recent distribution payment date for the Series A Preferred Units.

 

Furthermore, our financing arrangements require our subsidiaries and joint ventures to hold cash reserves that are, in certain cases, held for specifically designated uses, including working capital, operations and maintenance and debt service reserves, and are generally subject to “waterfall” provisions that allocate project revenues to specified priorities of use (such as operating expenses, scheduled debt service, targeted debt service reserves and any other reserves) and the remaining cash is distributable to us only on certain dates and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions.

 

Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus

 

General

 

All cash distributed to common unitholders is characterized as either “operating surplus” or “capital surplus.” We treat distributions of available cash from operating surplus differently than distributions of available cash from capital surplus.

 

20

 

 

Definition of Operating Surplus

 

Operating surplus for any period generally means:

 

·$25.0 million; plus

 

·all of our cash receipts (including our proportionate share of cash receipts of our subsidiaries, provided, that cash receipts from the termination of an interest rate, currency or commodity hedge contract prior to its specified termination date will be included in operating surplus in equal quarterly installments over the remaining scheduled life of such hedge contract), excluding cash from (1) borrowings, other than working capital borrowings, (2) sales of equity and debt securities, (3) sales or other dispositions of assets outside the ordinary course of business, (4) capital contributions and (5) corporate reorganizations or restructurings; plus

 

·working capital borrowings (including our proportionate share of working capital borrowings for our subsidiaries) made after the end of a quarter but before the date of determination of operating surplus for the quarter; plus

 

·cash distributions paid on equity securities issued (including the amount of any incremental distributions made to the holders of our incentive distribution rights and our proportionate share of such cash distributions paid by our subsidiaries), in each case, to finance all or any portion of the construction, replacement or improvement of a capital asset (such an FSRU or LNG carrier) in respect of the period from such financing until the earlier to occur of the date the capital asset is put into service or the date that it is abandoned or disposed of; plus

 

·cash distributions paid on equity securities issued (including the amount of any incremental distributions made to the holders of our incentive distribution rights and our proportionate share of such cash distributions paid by our subsidiaries), in each case, to pay the construction period interest on debt incurred (including periodic net payments under related interest rate swap contracts), or to pay construction period distributions on equity issued, to finance the construction projects described in the immediately preceding bullet point; less

 

·all of our “operating expenditures” (which includes estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures and is further described below) of us and our subsidiaries (including our proportionate share of operating expenditures by our subsidiaries); less

 

·the amount of cash reserves (including our proportionate share of cash reserves for our subsidiaries) established by our board of directors to provide funds for future operating expenditures; less

 

·any cash loss realized on dispositions of assets acquired using investment capital expenditures; less

 

·all working capital borrowings (including our proportionate share of working capital borrowings by our subsidiaries) not repaid within the 12-month period after having been incurred.

 

If a working capital borrowing, which increases operating surplus, is not repaid during the 12-month period following the borrowing, it will be deemed repaid at the end of such period, thus decreasing operating surplus at such time. When such working capital borrowing is in fact repaid, it will not be treated as a reduction in operating surplus because operating surplus will have been previously reduced by the deemed repayment.

 

As described above, operating surplus includes a provision that will enable us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus up to $25.0 million of cash we receive in the future from non-operating sources, such as asset sales, issuances of securities and long-term borrowings, that would otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. In addition, the effect of including, as described above, certain cash distributions on equity securities or interest payments on debt in operating surplus would be to increase operating surplus by the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments. As a result, we may also distribute as operating surplus up to the amount of any such cash distributions or interest payments we receive from non-operating sources.

 

21

 

 

Operating expenditures generally means all of our cash expenditures, including, but not limited to taxes, employee and director compensation, reimbursement of expenses to our general partner, repayment of working capital borrowings, debt service payments, distributions on the Series A Preferred Units and payments made under any interest rate, currency or commodity hedge contracts (provided that payments made in connection with the termination of any hedge contract prior to the expiration of its specified termination date shall be included in operating expenditures in equal quarterly installments over the remaining scheduled life of such hedge contract), provided that operating expenditures will not include:

 

·deemed repayments of working capital borrowings deducted from operating surplus pursuant to the last bullet point of the definition of operating surplus above when such repayment actually occurs;

 

·payments (including prepayments and payment penalties) of principal of and premium on indebtedness, other than working capital borrowings;

 

·expansion capital expenditures, investment capital expenditures or actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures (which are discussed in further detail under “—Capital Expenditures” below);

 

·payment of transaction expenses (including taxes) relating to interim capital transactions;

 

·payments made to Series A Preferred Unitholders to redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire Series A Preferred Units;

 

·distributions to partners other than distributions on the Series A Preferred Units; or

 

·repurchases of partnership interests (other than repurchases we make to satisfy obligations under employee benefit plans).

 

Capital Expenditures

 

For purposes of determining operating surplus, maintenance and replacement capital expenditures are those capital expenditures required to maintain over the long term the operating capacity and/or asset base of our capital assets, and expansion capital expenditures are those capital expenditures that increase the operating capacity and/or asset base of our capital assets. In our partnership agreement, we refer to these maintenance and replacement capital expenditures as “maintenance capital expenditures.” To the extent, however, that capital expenditures associated with acquiring a new vessel or other LNG infrastructure asset or improving an existing asset increase the revenues or the operating capacity of our fleet, those capital expenditures would be classified as expansion capital expenditures.

 

Investment capital expenditures are those capital expenditures that are neither maintenance and replacement capital expenditures nor expansion capital expenditures. Investment capital expenditures largely will consist of capital expenditures made for investment purposes. Examples of investment capital expenditures include traditional capital expenditures for investment purposes, such as purchases of equity securities, as well as other capital expenditures that might be made in lieu of such traditional investment capital expenditures, such as the acquisition of a capital asset for investment purposes.

 

Capital expenditures that are made in part for maintenance and replacement capital purposes, investment capital purposes and/or expansion capital purposes will be allocated to maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, investment capital expenditures or expansion capital expenditures by our board of directors.

 

Examples of maintenance and replacement capital expenditures include capital expenditures associated with drydocking, modifying an existing vessel or acquiring a new vessel to the extent such expenditures are incurred to maintain the operating capacity or asset base of our fleet. Maintenance and replacement capital expenditures will also include interest (and related fees) on debt incurred and distributions on equity issued (including the amount of any incremental distributions made to the holders of our incentive distribution rights) to finance the construction of a replacement vessel and paid in respect of the construction period, which we define as the period beginning on the date that we enter into a binding construction contract and ending on the earlier of the date that the replacement vessel commences commercial service or the date that the replacement vessel is abandoned or disposed of. Debt incurred to pay or equity issued to fund construction period interest payments, and distributions on such equity (including the amount of any incremental distributions made to the holders of our incentive distribution rights), will also be considered maintenance and replacement capital expenditures.

 

22

 

 

Because our maintenance and replacement capital expenditures can be very large and vary significantly in timing, the amount of our actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures may differ substantially from period to period, which could cause similar fluctuations in the amounts of operating surplus, adjusted operating surplus and available cash for distribution to our unitholders than if we subtracted actual maintenance and replacement capital expenditures from operating surplus each quarter. Accordingly, to eliminate the effect on operating surplus of these fluctuations, our partnership agreement will require that an amount equal to an estimate of the average quarterly maintenance and replacement capital expenditures necessary to maintain the operating capacity or asset base of our capital assets over the long term be subtracted from operating surplus each quarter, as opposed to the actual amounts spent. In our partnership agreement, we refer to these estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures to be subtracted from operating surplus as “estimated maintenance capital expenditures.” The amount of estimated maintenance and replacement capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by our board of directors at least once a year, provided that any change must be approved by our conflicts committee. The estimate will be made at least annually and whenever an event occurs that is likely to result in a material adjustment to the amount of our maintenance and replacement capital expenditures, such as a major acquisition or the introduction of new governmental regulations that will affect our fleet. For purposes of calculating operating surplus, any adjustment to this estimate will be prospective only.

 

Definition of Capital Surplus

 

Capital surplus generally is generated only by:

 

·borrowings other than working capital borrowings;

 

·sales of debt and equity securities; and

 

·sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in the ordinary course of business or non-current assets sold as part of normal retirements or replacements of assets.

 

Characterization of Cash Distributions

 

We treat all available cash distributed as coming from operating surplus until the sum of all available cash distributed since we began operations equals the operating surplus as of the most recent date of determination of available cash. We treat any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus, regardless of its source, as capital surplus. As described above, operating surplus does not reflect actual cash on hand that is available for distribution to our common unitholders. For example, it includes a provision that enables us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus up to $25.0 million of cash we receive in the future from non-operating sources, such as asset sales, issuances of securities and long-term borrowings, that would otherwise be distributed as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we will make any distributions from capital surplus.

 

Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus

 

We will make distributions of available cash from operating surplus for any quarter in the following manner:

 

·first, 100.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that quarter; and

 

·thereafter, in the manner described in “—Incentive Distribution Rights” below.

 

General Partner Interest

 

Our general partner owns a non-economic general partner interest in us, which does not entitle it to receive cash distributions. However, our general partner may in the future own common units or other equity securities in us and will be entitled to receive distributions on any such interests.

 

23

 

 

Incentive Distribution Rights

 

Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved. Höegh LNG currently holds the incentive distribution rights. The incentive distribution rights may be transferred separately from any other interest. Any transfer by Höegh LNG of the incentive distribution rights would not change the percentage allocations of quarterly distributions with respect to such rights.

 

If for any quarter we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the common unitholders in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution, then, we will distribute any additional available cash from operating surplus for that quarter among the common unitholders in the following manner:

 

·first, 100.00% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.388125 per unit for that quarter (the “first target distribution”);

 

·second, 85.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.421875 per unit for that quarter (the “second target distribution”);

 

·third, 75.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 25.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.50625 per unit for that quarter (the “third target distribution”); and

 

·thereafter, 50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata.

 

The percentage interests set forth above assume that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.

 

Höegh LNG’s Right to Reset Incentive Distribution Levels

 

Höegh LNG, as the holder of our incentive distribution rights, has the right under our partnership agreement to elect to relinquish the right of the holders of our incentive distribution rights to receive incentive distribution payments based on the initial cash target distribution levels and to reset, at higher levels, the minimum quarterly distribution amount and cash target distribution levels upon which the incentive distribution payments to Höegh LNG would be set. Höegh LNG’s right to reset the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels upon which the incentive distributions payable to Höegh LNG are based may be exercised, without approval of our unitholders or the conflicts committee of our board of directors, at any time when we have made cash distributions to the holders of the incentive distribution rights at the highest level of incentive distribution for each of the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters (and the amount of each such total distribution did not exceed adjusted operating surplus for each such quarter). If at the time of any election to reset the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels Höegh LNG and its affiliates are not the holders of a majority of the incentive distribution rights, then any such election to reset shall be subject to the prior written concurrence of our board of directors that the conditions described in the immediately preceding sentence have been satisfied. The reset minimum quarterly distribution amount and cash target distribution levels will be higher than the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels prior to the reset such that there will be no incentive distributions paid under the reset cash target distribution levels until cash distributions per common unit following this event increase as described below.

 

In connection with the resetting of the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels and the corresponding relinquishment by Höegh LNG of incentive distribution payments based on the cash target distribution levels prior to the reset, Höegh LNG will be entitled to receive a number of newly issued common units based on a predetermined formula described below that takes into account the “cash parity” value of the average cash distributions related to the incentive distribution rights received by Höegh LNG for the two quarters prior to the reset event as compared to the average cash distribution per common unit during this period.

 

24

 

 

The number of common units that Höegh LNG would be entitled to receive from us in connection with a resetting of the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels then in effect would be equal to (x) the average amount of cash distributions received by Höegh LNG in respect of its incentive distribution rights during the two consecutive fiscal quarters ended immediately prior to the date of such reset election divided by (y) the average of the amount of cash distributed per common unit during each of these two quarters. The issuance of the additional common units will be conditioned upon approval of the listing or admission for trading of such common units by the national securities exchange on which the common units are then listed or admitted for trading.

  

Following a reset election, the minimum quarterly distribution amount will be reset to an amount equal to the average cash distribution amount per unit for the two fiscal quarters immediately preceding the reset election (such amount is referred to as the “reset minimum quarterly distribution amount”) and the cash target distribution levels will be reset to be correspondingly higher such that we would distribute all of our available cash from operating surplus for each quarter thereafter as follows:

 

first, 100.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives an amount equal to 115.0% of the reset minimum quarterly distribution amount for that quarter;

 

second, 85.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives an amount per unit equal to 125.0% of the reset minimum quarterly distribution amount for that quarter;

 

third, 75.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 25.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives an amount per unit equal to 150.0% of the reset minimum quarterly distribution amount for that quarter; and

 

thereafter, 50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights, pro rata.

 

 Assuming that it continues to hold a majority of our incentive distribution rights, Höegh LNG will be entitled to cause the minimum quarterly distribution amount and the cash target distribution levels to be reset on more than one occasion, provided that it may not make a reset election except at a time when the holders of the incentive distribution rights have received incentive distributions for the prior four consecutive fiscal quarters based on the highest level of incentive distributions that the holders of incentive distribution rights are entitled to receive under our partnership agreement.

 

Distributions From Capital Surplus

 

How Distributions From Capital Surplus Will Be Made

 

We will make distributions of available cash from capital surplus, if any, in the following manner:

 

first, 100.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until the minimum quarterly distribution is reduced to zero, as described below; and

 

thereafter, we will make all distributions of available cash from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus.

 

The preceding paragraph is based on the assumption that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.

 

Effect of a Distribution From Capital Surplus

 

Our partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus on our common units as the repayment of the consideration for the issuance of the units, which is a return of capital. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the cash target distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as the distribution had to the fair market value of the common units prior to the announcement of the distribution. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions are made, it may be easier for Höegh LNG to receive incentive distributions. However, any distribution of capital surplus before the minimum quarterly distribution is reduced to zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution.

 

25

 

 

Once we reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the cash target distribution levels to zero, we will then make all future distributions 50.0% to the holders of common units and 50.0% to the holders of the incentive distribution rights.

 

Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels

 

In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital surplus, if we combine our common units into fewer units or subdivide our common units into a greater number of units, we will proportionately adjust:

 

  the minimum quarterly distribution;

 

  the cash target distribution levels; and

 

  the initial unit price.

  

For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the cash target distribution levels and the initial unit price would each be reduced to 50.0% of its initial level. We will not make any adjustment by reason of the issuance of additional units for cash or property.

 

Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation

 

If we dissolve in accordance with our partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called liquidation. We will apply the proceeds of liquidation in the manner set forth below.

 

First, holders of the Series A Preferred Units will have the right to receive the liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of payment, whether or not declared.

 

After such Series A Preferred Unit distributions, if, as of the date three trading days prior to the announcement of the proposed liquidation, the average closing price for our common units for the preceding 20 trading days (the “current market price”) is greater than the initial unit price (less any prior capital surplus distributions and any prior cash distributions made in connection with a partial liquidation);

 

then the proceeds of the liquidation will be applied as follows:

 

first, 100.0% to the common unitholders, pro rata, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to the current market price of our common units; and

 

26

 

 

thereafter, 50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to holders of incentive distribution rights.

 

If, as of the date three trading days prior to the announcement of the proposed liquidation, the current market price of our common units is equal to or less than the initial unit price (less any prior capital surplus distributions and any prior cash distributions made in connection with a partial liquidation);

 

then the proceeds of the liquidation will be applied as follows:

 

•              first, 100.0% to the common unitholders, pro rata, until we distribute for each outstanding common unit an amount equal to the initial unit price (less any prior capital surplus distributions and any prior cash distributions made on our common units in connection with a partial liquidation); and

 

•              thereafter, 50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to holders of incentive distribution rights.

 

The immediately preceding paragraph is based on the assumption that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.

.

27

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 4.6

 

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

AMONG

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP,

 

HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS OPERATING LLC

 

AND

 

HÖEGH LNG AS

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

Page

 

Section 1. Definitions 1
Section 2. General 3
Section 3. Subcontracting 3
Section 4. Covenants 4
Section 5. Exclusivity 4
Section 6. Confidential Information 4
Section 7. VAT 4
Section 8. General Relationship Between the Parties 5
Section 9. Indemnity 5
Section 10. Term and Termination 5
Section 11. Subcontractor Costs and Expenses Upon Termination 6
Section 12. Surrender of Books and Records 6
Section 13. Entire Agreement 6
Section 14. Severability 6
Section 15. Law and Arbitration 7
Section 16. Notice 8
Section 17. Variation 8
Section 18. Waiver 8
Section 19. Assignment 8
Section 20. Third Parties 9
Section 21. Counterparts 9
     
Schedule A Administrative Services  
Schedule B Managers  

 

  i 

 

 

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

 

THIS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT is entered into on December 20, 2019, and effective as of July 3, 2019 (this “Agreement”), among Höegh LNG Partners LP, a Marshall Islands limited partnership (the “MLP”), Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC, a Marshall Islands limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of the MLP (the “Operating Company”), and Höegh LNG AS, a Norwegian private limited liability company with company number 989 837 877 (“Höegh Norway”), each a “Party” and collectively, the “Parties.

 

RECITALS:

 

1.The MLP, a limited partnership whose common units and preferred units representing limited partner interests in the MLP are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and the Operating Company are holding entities that indirectly own (or may in the future own) interests in FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets and require certain administrative services.

 

2.The MLP and the Operating Company wish to engage Höegh Norway to provide, or procure the provision of, administrative services to the MLP and the Operating Company on the terms set out herein.

 

In consideration of the premises and the covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

 

Section 1.                Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the respective meanings set forth below:

 

Administrative Services” means the Administrative Services set out in Schedule A.

 

Agreement” has the meaning given such term the introduction to this Agreement.

 

Change of Control” means, with respect to any entity, an event in which securities of any class entitling the holders thereof to elect a majority of the members of the board of directors or other similar governing body of the entity are acquired, directly or indirectly, by a ‘‘person” or “group” (within the meaning of Section 13(d) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), who did not immediately before such acquisition own securities of the entity entitling such person or group to elect such majority (and for the purpose of this definition, any such securities held by another person who is related to such person are deemed to be owned by such person).

 

Dispute” has the meaning given such term in Section 15.

 

General Partner” means Höegh LNG GP LLC, a Marshall Islands limited liability company and the general partner of the MLP.

 

 1 

 

 

Höegh LNG Group” means Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. and their respective direct and indirect subsidiaries.

 

Höegh Norway” has the meaning given such term in the introduction to this Agreement.

 

LCIA” has the meaning given such term in Section 15.

 

LIBOR” means the three month London interbank offered rate for deposits in U.S. Dollars administered by ICE Benchmark Administration Limited (or such body or service as may replace ICE Benchmark Administration Limited for the purpose of determining or displaying the three month London interbank offered rates for deposits in US Dollars) at or about 12:00 London time on the relevant date; provided that if: (i) such date is not a day on which banks in London are normally open for business (“London Banking Day”), the rate shall be the rate on the immediately preceding London Banking Day; (ii) such rate is negative, then the Parties agree to use a percentage rate of zero (0); and (iii) the London interbank offered rate ceases to exist, then the Parties shall agree on a reasonably comparable interest rate.

 

Managers” has the meaning given such term in Section 4(a).

 

MLP” has the meaning given such term in the introduction to this Agreement.

 

MLP Agreement” means the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the MLP, dated October 5, 2017, as from time to time amended.

 

MLP Board” means the Board of Directors of the MLP.

 

Officers” has the meaning given such term in the MLP Agreement.

 

Operating Company” has the meaning given such term in the introduction to this Agreement.

 

Operating Company Board” means the Board of Directors of the Operating Company.

 

Partnership Group” means the MLP, the General Partner and the subsidiaries of the Partnership.

 

Party” or “Parties” has the meaning given such term in the introduction to this Agreement.

 

Person” means an individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, limited liability company, unincorporated organization or any other entity.

 

Subcontractor” has the meaning given such term in Section 3.

 

Subcontractor Costs and Expenses” has the meaning given such term in Section 3(b).

 

Subcontractor Due Date” has the meaning given such term in Section 3(e).

 

Subcontractor Services Fees” has the meaning given such term in Section 3(c).

 

 2 

 

 

Tribunal” has the meaning given such term in Section 15.

 

Unitholders” means holders of common and preferred units representing limited partnership interests in the MLP.

 

VAT” means value added, goods, sales or any similar tax.

 

Section 2.                General.

 

(a)               Höegh Norway shall provide, or procure the provision of, the Administrative Services to the MLP and the Operating Company (each, acting reasonably) and subject to the respective supervision of the MLP Board and the Operating Company Board. Höegh Norway may subcontract such part of the Administrative Services as the MLP or the Operating Company may authorize from time to time; provided, however, that Höegh Norway may only subcontract such portion of the Administrative Services to other legal entities in the Höegh LNG Group. Notwithstanding any such subcontracting, Höegh Norway shall remain responsible and primarily liable for the provision of the Administrative Services. For the avoidance of doubt, Höegh Norway shall not make any decisions relating to the business strategies of the MLP or the Operating Company.

 

Section 3.                Subcontracting. If the MLP, the Operating Company and Höegh Norway agree that other legal entities of the Höegh LNG Group (“Subcontractor”) shall perform all or part of the Administrative Services, the terms of such subcontracting arrangement will be as follows:

 

(a)               Subcontractor shall comply with the covenants set out in Section 4, Section 5 and Section 12;

 

(b)               the MLP or the Operating Company (as applicable) shall reimburse Höegh Norway on a monthly basis in arrears for all costs and expenses reasonably incurred by Höegh Norway (the “Subcontractor Costs and Expenses”) in connection with the provision of the Administrative Services for the preceding month;

 

(c)               the MLP or the Operating Company (as applicable) shall pay to Höegh Norway on a monthly basis in arrears a services fee equal to 3.00% of the Subcontractor Costs and Expenses, including direct payroll costs but excluding re-invoicing of external audit services, for the preceding month (the “Subcontractor Services Fees”);

 

(d)               within 20 days after the end of each calendar month, Höegh Norway shall submit to the MLP and the Operating Company for payment an invoice covering the Subcontractor Costs and Expenses and the Subcontractor Services Fees. Each invoice will contain such supporting detail as may be reasonably required to validate such amounts due; and

 

(e)               the MLP or the Operating Company (as applicable) shall make payment owed pursuant to this Section 2(a) within 45 days of the date of each invoice (any such day on which a payment is due, a “Subcontractor Due Date”). All invoices for the Subcontractor Costs and Expenses and the Subcontractor Services Fees will be submitted in and paid in U.S. Dollars. All amounts not paid within 10 days after the Subcontractor Due Date bear interest at the rate of 3.00% per annum above LIBOR as of the Subcontractor Due Date from such Subcontractor Due Date until the date payment is received in full by Höegh Norway.

 

 3 

 

 

Section 4.                Covenants. During the term of this Agreement, Höegh Norway shall:

 

(a)               cause those of its officers set forth on Schedule B and any other of its officers or employees as the MLP Board or the Operating Company Board may from time to time reasonably request (collectively, the “Managers”) to hold the positions, and provide the services associated with such positions, set forth on Schedule B;

 

(b)               procure that the Managers hold the positions, and provide the services associated with such positions, set forth on Schedule B to the same level of skill and care as would be required of them by applicable law and the terms of the MLP Agreement if they were Officers of the MLP;

 

(c)               perform, or procure the performance of, the Administrative Services in a diligent manner;

 

(d)               retain, or procure at all times the retention by any Person to whom performance of the Administrative Services is subcontracted from time to time of, sufficiently qualified staff to provide the Administrative Services;

 

(e)               keep, and procure the keeping by any Person to whom performance of the Administrative Services is subcontracted of, full and proper books, records and accounts showing clearly all transactions relating to the provision of the Administrative Services in accordance with established general commercial practices and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and provide or procure access to the MLP and the Operating Company and their representatives to audit and examine such books, records and accounts at any time during customary business hours; and

 

(f)                comply, and procure the compliance by any Person to whom performance of the Administrative Services is subcontracted, with all laws and regulations applicable to the Parties, including, but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and any other anti-corruption legislation.

 

Section 5.                Exclusivity. Höegh Norway and its employees shall not, without the prior written consent of the MLP and the Operating Company (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), provide services of a nature similar to the Administrative Services to any other Person.

 

Section 6.                Confidential Information. Höegh Norway shall, and shall procure that any Person to whom performance of any of the Administrative Services is subcontracted, keep confidential, all information it has acquired or developed in the course of providing the Administrative Services.

 

Section 7.                VAT.

 

(a)               All amounts payable under this Agreement are deemed to be exclusive of VAT, which will be payable upon receipt of a valid VAT invoice, if subject to VAT.

 

 4 

 

 

(b)               Where this Agreement requires one Party to reimburse another for any costs or expenses, the payer shall, at the same time, pay the payee all VAT incurred by the payee in respect of those costs or expenses. The amount payable will be the amount that the payee reasonably determines is the amount that neither it, nor any other member of any group of which it is a member for VAT purposes, is entitled to recover from the relevant tax authority in respect of the VAT.

 

Section 8.                General Relationship Between the Parties. Höegh Norway and any Subcontractors shall perform the Administrative Services as independent contractors and the Parties do not intend, and nothing herein will be interpreted so as, to create a partnership or joint venture relationship or agency relationship between Höegh Norway and any one or more of the MLP, the Operating Company, the General Partner or any other member of the Partnership Group. Nothing in this Agreement creates any employment relationship between the MLP or the Operating Company, on the one hand, and the Managers or any other Person performing the Administrative Services, on the other.

 

Section 9.                Indemnity. The MLP and the Operating Company shall indemnify and hold harmless any Person to whom provision of the Administrative Services is subcontracted in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (including Höegh Norway and its Subcontractors) and their officers, employees and agents against all actions, proceedings, claims, demands or liabilities that may be brought against them due to the performance of the Administrative Services, including, without limitation, all actions, proceedings, claims, demands or liabilities brought under the environmental laws of any jurisdiction, and against and in respect of all costs and expenses (including legal costs and expenses on a full indemnity basis) they may suffer or incur due to defending or settling same; provided, however, that such indemnity excludes any or all losses, actions, proceedings, claims, demands, costs, damages, expenses and liabilities whatsoever to the extent that they are caused by or due to the fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence of such subcontractor or its officers, employees or agents. Any such subcontractor and each of its officers, employees and agents may enforce the provisions of this Section 9 in accordance with the provisions of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

 

Section 10.            Term and Termination. This Agreement may be terminated:

 

(a)               by the MLP Board and the Operating Company Board upon 90 days’ written notice for any reason in each of their sole discretion;

 

(b)               by Höegh Norway upon 90 days’ written notice if:

 

(i)                 there is a Change of Control of the MLP or the General Partner;

 

(ii)              a receiver is appointed for all or substantially all of the property of the MLP or the Operating Company;

 

(iii)            an order is made to wind up the MLP or the Operating Company;

 

(iv)             a final judgment, order or decree that materially and adversely affects the ability of the MLP or the Operating Company to perform under this Agreement will have been obtained or entered against the MLP or the Operating Company, and such judgment, order or decree will not have been vacated, discharged or stayed; or

 

 5 

 

 

(v)               the MLP makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, files a petition in bankruptcy or for liquidation, is adjudged insolvent or bankrupt, commences any proceeding for a reorganization or arrangement of debts, dissolution or liquidation under any law or statute or of any jurisdiction applicable thereto or if any such proceeding is commenced; or

 

(c)               at any time on or after December 31, 2024, by Höegh Norway upon 90 days’ written notice for any reason in its sole discretion.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing and as provided in Schedule B, the arrangement with respect to the positions held, and the provision of services associated with such positions, by any or all of the Managers may be terminated at any time with respect to any or all of such Managers by the MLP Board in its sole discretion. Such positions, and the provision of services associated with such positions, terminate immediately upon delivery by the MLP Board of written notice to Höegh Norway and the Operating Company. The termination of the positions held, and the provision of services associated with such positions, by any or all of the Managers does not constitute a termination of the other provisions of this Agreement.

 

Any termination of this Agreement is without prejudice to any accrued rights and liabilities of any Party subsisting as of the date of termination. Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, the provisions of Section 6, Section 9, Section 10, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13, Section 14, Section 15, Section 17, Section 18 and Section 19 shall survive the termination and will remain in force and binding on the Parties.

 

Section 11.            Subcontractor Costs and Expenses Upon Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 10, the MLP and the Operating Company shall be obligated to pay any and all amounts payable pursuant to Section 3 for the applicable Administrative Services provided prior to the time of termination.

 

Section 12.            Surrender of Books and Records. Upon termination of this Agreement, Höegh Norway shall forthwith surrender to the MLP and the Operating Company, or procure the surrender to the MLP and the Operating Company, of any and all books, records, documents and other property relating to this Agreement and to the business, finance, technology, trademarks or affairs of the MLP and any member of the Partnership Group and, except as required by law, shall not retain any copies of same.

 

Section 13.            Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the matters contained herein, superseding all prior contracts or agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the matters contained herein.

 

Section 14.            Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any Person or circumstance is held invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to other Persons or circumstances will not be affected thereby and will be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

 

 6 

 

 

Section 15.            Law and Arbitration. This Agreement (including the agreement as to arbitration contained herein) and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it (including disputes as to regarding its existence, validity or termination) or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) (a “Dispute”) will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the substantive laws of England and Wales without reference to any choice of law principle that would result in the application of any other law.

 

The Parties specifically acknowledge that the terms of this Agreement represent their sole and express intent, to the exclusion of any other intent, and they specifically disclaim the application of any provision of the applicable law, legal doctrine, or principle that would permit variance or avoidance of these terms.

 

Any Dispute will be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the rules of arbitration of the London Court of International Arbitration (the “LCIA”), which rules are deemed to be incorporated herein. The seat (or legal place) of arbitration will be London, England. The language of the arbitration will be English.

 

The tribunal (the “Tribunal”) will consist of one arbitrator. The Parties shall jointly nominate the sole arbitrator within 30 days of the request for arbitration. If the Parties fail to agree on the sole arbitrator within such time, the LCIA court shall appoint the arbitrator on an expedited basis.

 

Any award will be final and binding on the Parties and may be confirmed in, and judgment upon the award entered by, any court having jurisdiction. The Parties hereby waive any reference to the courts under Sections 45 and 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.

 

The Tribunal shall render a final award in any arbitration within six months of the appointment of the Tribunal by the LCIA court. This time limit may only be extended with the consent of the Parties or by the Tribunal for good cause shown, provided, that no award will be invalid even if it is not rendered within the time period herein specified, or not rendered within any extended period. At the earliest opportunity, the Tribunal shall, in consultation with the Parties, set out a procedural timetable for the service of pleadings and evidence. Any pleading or evidence served otherwise than in compliance with such timetable will be struck out by the Tribunal, unless the submitting Party shows good cause for the deviation and has been granted an appropriate extension by the Tribunal (ahead of the expiration of the relevant deadline), bearing in mind the effect such extension will or may have on the case timetable.

 

The Parties agree that there will be a presumption that there will be no disclosure or discovery of documents, save for the documents that each Party intends to rely upon. To the extent that the Tribunal considers that it may be appropriate to order any document production beyond this, it will be guided by the IBA Rules of the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration in doing so.

 

The Parties agree that, if any provision of this Agreement is not performed in accordance with its terms, irreparable damage may occur and, notwithstanding this Section 15, the Party affected thereby is entitled to apply to the courts of England and Wales for an interim injunction to prevent such breach, or continuing breach, of this Agreement and/or specific performance of the provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy available under English law, including those prescribed by Section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996. The Parties agree that any application to the courts of England and Wales made hereunder is one of urgency, and legal proceedings may be immediately commenced in the English courts, notwithstanding that the arbitration procedure prescribed in this Section 15 has not yet been initiated. Any injunction or order so issued will be enforceable in any court having jurisdiction over any Party.

 

 7 

 

 

Section 16.            Notice. Notice under this Agreement will be given (via hand delivery or facsimile) as follows:

 

If to the MLP:

 

Attn: Steffen Føreid
c/o Höegh LNG AS
Drammensveien 134, PO Box 4
Skoyen, NO-0212 Oslo, Norway
Telephone: +47 9755 74 06
Fax: +47 9755 7401

 

If to the Operating Company:

 

Attn: Steffen Føreid
c/o Höegh LNG AS
Drammensveien 134, PO Box 4
Skoyen, NO-0212 Oslo, Norway
Telephone: +47 9755 74 06
Fax: +47 9755 7401

 

If to Höegh Norway:

 

Attn: Sveinung J. S. Støhle
Höegh LNG AS
Drammensveien 134, PO Box 4
Skoyen, NO-0212 Oslo, Norway
Telephone: +47 9755 7400
Fax: +47 9755 7401

 

Section 17.            Variation. Any variation to this Agreement will not be effective unless it is made in writing and signed by all of the Parties.

 

Section 18.            Waiver. The failure of either Party to enforce any term of this Agreement does not act as a waiver. Any waiver must be specifically stated as such in writing.

 

Section 19.            Assignment. No Party is permitted to assign or otherwise dispose of the benefit of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Parties. This Agreement is binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties’ successors and assigns.

 

 8 

 

 

Section 20.            Third Parties. Save as expressly provided by this Agreement, a Person who is not a Party has no light to enforce or to receive the benefit of this Agreement under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties may terminate, rescind or agree to any variation, waiver or settlement under this Agreement without the consent of any other Person.

 

Section 21.            Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all signatory Parties had signed the same document. All counterparts are to be construed together and constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

 

 9 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on, and effective as of, the dates first above written.

 

  HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP
       
  By: /s/ Steffen Føreid
    Name: Steffen Føreid
    Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer
       
  HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS OPERATING LLC
       
  By: /s/ Steffen Føreid
    Name: Steffen Føreid
    Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer
       
  HÖEGH LNG AS
       
  By:   /s/ Sveinung J.S. Støhle
    Name:   Sveinung J.S. Støhle
    Title: General Manager

 

 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT AMONG THE MLP,
THE OPERATING COMPANY AND HÖEGH NORWAY

 

 

 

 

SCHEDULE A

 

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

 

Höegh Norway shall provide, or subcontract the provision of, such of the following administrative services (the “Administrative Services”) to the MLP or the Operating Company, as the MLP Board or the Operating Company Board may from time to time request and direct Höegh Norway to provide pursuant to this Agreement:

 

(a)               Assist with the commercial management of the MLP and the Operating Company and the execution of the business strategies of the MLP and the Operating Company and investment decisions made by the MLP Board and the Operating Company Board, provided, that nothing herein permits or authorizes Höegh Norway to make any strategic or investment decisions for or on behalf of the MLP or the Operating Company;

 

(b)               Keep and maintain at all times books, records and accounts that contain particulars of receipts and disbursements relating to the assets and liabilities of the MLP and the Operating Company, and such books, records and accounts will be kept pursuant to normal commercial practices that permit the MLP and the Operating Company to prepare or cause to be prepared financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and in each case will also be in accordance with those financial statements required to be kept by the MLP under applicable federal securities laws and regulations in the United States and as the MLP and the Operating Company are required to keep and file under applicable foreign taxing regulations and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations applicable with respect thereto, all as amended from time to time, provided that any register of members of the MLP shall be kept outside the United Kingdom;

 

(c)               Assist in preparing all such returns, filings and documents, for review and approval by the MLP and the Operating Company as may be required under the MLP Agreement, as well as such other returns, filings, documents and instruments as may from time to time be requested or instructed by the MLP or the Operating Company, and assist in filing such documents, as applicable, as directed by the MLP or the Operating Company with the relevant authority, except that such returns, filings and documents may not be approved by Höegh Norway;

 

(d)               Assist in providing, or arranging for the provision of, advisory services to the MLP with respect to the MLP’s obligations under applicable securities laws and regulations in the United States and assist in arranging for compliance by the MLP with continuous disclosure obligations under applicable securities laws and regulations and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and any other securities exchange upon which the MLP’s securities are listed, including to assist in the preparation for review, approval and filing by the MLP of reports and other documents with all applicable regulatory authorities, provided, that nothing herein permits or authorizes Höegh Norway to act for or on behalf of the MLP in its relationship with regulatory authorities, except to the extent that specific authorization may from time to time be given by the MLP;

 

 A-1 

 

 

(e)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, advisory, clerical and investor relations services to assist and support the MLP, attending roadshows and promoting investment in the MLP, planning and executing investor relations activities and communications with potential investors, the financial community and the Unitholders, including in connection with disclosures that may be required for regulatory compliance to the Unitholders and the wider financial markets, as the MLP may from time to time request or direct, provided, that nothing herein permits or authorizes Höegh Norway to determine the content of any such communications by the MLP to the Unitholders and the wider financial markets;

 

(f)                At the request and under the direction of the MLP, handle, or arrange for the handling of, all administrative and clerical matters in respect of (i) the call and arrangement of all meetings of the Unitholders pursuant to the MLP Agreement, (ii) the preparation of all materials (including notices of meetings and information circulars) in respect thereof and (iii) the submission of all such materials to the MLP in sufficient time prior to the dates upon which they must be mailed, filed or otherwise relied upon so that the MLP has full opportunity to review, approve, execute and return them to Höegh Norway for filing or mailing or other disposition as the MLP may require or direct;

 

(g)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, or secure sufficient and necessary office space, equipment and personnel, including all accounting, clerical, secretarial, corporate, administrative and information technology services, as may be reasonably necessary for the performance of the MLP’s and the Operating Company’s businesses;

 

(h)               Arrange for the provision of such audit, internal audit, accounting, insurance, legal, valuation and other professional services as are reasonably required by the MLP and the Operating Company from time to time in connection with the discharge of the MLP’s responsibilities under the MLP Agreement (including the review of quarterly and annual reports) and otherwise as requested by the MLP or the Operating Company, to the extent such advice and analysis can be reasonably provided or arranged by Höegh Norway, provided, that nothing herein permits or authorizes Höegh Norway to select the auditor of the MLP and the Operating Company, which will be selected in accordance with the provisions for the appointment of the auditor pursuant to the MLP Agreement or as otherwise required by law governing the MLP and the Operating Company, or to communicate with the auditor other than in the ordinary course of making such books and records available for review as the auditor may require and to respond to queries from the auditor with respect to the accounts and statements prepared by, or arranged by, Höegh Norway, and in particular Höegh Norway shall not have any of the authorities, rights or responsibilities of the audit committee of the MLP Board, but shall provide, or arrange for the provision of, information to such committee as may from time to time be required or requested, and provided further, that nothing herein entitles Höegh Norway to retain legal counsel for the MLP unless such selection is specifically approved by the MLP Board;

 

(i)                 Assist in providing consultancy on insurance matters, both in respect of arranging suitable cover and settling claims, and coordinating legal services.

 

(j)                 Provide, or arrange for the provision of, such assistance and support as the MLP and the Operating Company may from time to time request in connection with any new or existing capitalization or financing of the MLP and/or the Operating Company, including executing bank financing and capital markets transactions, such assistance and support to be provided in accordance with the direction, and under the supervision, of the MLP Board and the Operating Company Board, provided that Höegh Norway shall not make any decision on entering into such transactions;

 

 A-2 

 

 

(k)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, such administrative and clerical services as may be required by the MLP and the Operating Company to support and assist the MLP and the Operating Company in considering any future acquisitions or divestments of assets of the MLP or the Operating Company, as applicable, and for the integration of any businesses or assets acquired by the MLP, all in accordance with the direction and under the supervision of the MLP Board or the Operating Company;

 

(l)                 Provide, or arrange for the provision of, such support and assistance to the MLP as the MLP may from time to time request in connection with any future offerings of equity or debt securities that the MLP may at any time determine is desirable for the MLP, all under the direction and supervision of the MLP Board;

 

(m)             Provide, or arrange for the provision of, at the request and under the direction of the MLP Board, such communications to the transfer agent for the MLP as may be necessary or desirable;

 

(n)               Prepare and provide, or arrange for the preparation and provision of, regular cash reports and other accounting information for review by the MLP, so as to permit and enable the MLP Board to make all determinations of financial matters required to be made pursuant to the MLP Agreement, including the determination of amounts available for distribution by the MLP to the Unitholders, and to assist the MLP in making arrangements with the transfer agent for the MLP for the payment of distributions to the Unitholders in accordance with the MLP Agreement;

 

(o)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, such assistance to the MLP as the MLP Board may request or direct with respect to the performance of the obligations to the Unitholders under the MLP Agreement and to provide monitoring of various obligations and rights under agreements entered into by the MLP and to provide advance reports on a timely basis to the MLP advising of steps, procedures and compliance issues under such agreements, so as to enable the MLP to make all such decisions as would be necessary or desirable thereunder;

 

(p)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, such additional administrative and clerical services pertaining to the MLP, the assets and liabilities of the MLP and the Unitholders and matters incidental thereto as may be reasonably requested by the MLP Board from time to time;

 

(q)               Negotiate and arrange, at the request and under the direction of the MLP Board, for interest rate swap agreements, foreign currency contracts, forward exchange contracts and any other hedging arrangements, provided that Höegh Norway shall not have authority to execute such agreements;

 

(r)                Provide, or arrange for the provision of, information technology services;

 

 A-3 

 

 

(s)                Maintain, or arrange for the maintenance of, the MLP’s and the MLP’s subsidiaries’ existence and good standing in necessary jurisdictions;

 

(t)                 Monitor and maintain compliance with loan and credit terms with lenders;

 

(u)               Assist in providing technical information, describing business cases, drafting information memoranda and performing calculations for the purpose of the financing of possible investments, and such other assistance as may be required from time to time of similar nature or in project development;

 

(v)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, at the request and under the direction of the MLP Board, cash management and services, including assistance with preparation of budgets, overseeing banking services and bank accounts and arranging for the deposit of funds;

 

(w)             Provide, or arrange for the provision of, advice on cash management and services under the direction of the Operating Company Board, including assistance with preparing regular cash reports and other accounting information for review by the Operating Company, so as to permit and enable the Operating Company Board to make the determination of amounts available for distribution by the Operating Company to the MLP; and

 

(x)               Provide, or arrange for the provision of, advice on financing and other agreements into which the Operating Company is considering entering.

 

 A-4 

 

 

SCHEDULE B MANAGERS

 

Name

 

Position with the Operating Company

 

Position with the MLP

Steffen Føreid   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 B-1 

 

 

Exhibit 4.25.5

 

Execution version

  

GLOBAL LNG SAS

 

and

 

TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin - Geneva Branch and

 

AND

 

SRV JOINT GAS LTD.

 

  Deed of novation AND AMENDMENT  

 

 

 

 

THIS DEED is made on 20 December 2019

 

BETWEEN:

 

(1)GLOBAL LNG SAS, a French société par actions simplifiée, whose registered office is located at 1, passerelle des Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie (France), registered with the trade and companies register of Nanterre under number 833 285 877 RCS Nanterre (the "Original Party");

 

(2)TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, a company incorporated under the laws of England, with registered office at 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5BF (UK company number 02172239), trading through its branch office TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch, registered under number CHE-309.541.427 and located at Route de l'Aéroport 10, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland ("TGPL"); and

 

(3)SRV JOINT GAS LTD., a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with registered address at Clifton House, 75 Fort Street, Grand Cayman KY1-1108, Cayman Islands, and with correspondence address at c/o Höegh LNG AS, Drammensveien 134 NO-0277, Oslo, Norway (the "Owner")

 

(also referred to hereinafter collectively as the "Parties").

 

INTRODUCTION:

 

(A)The Original Party and the Owner are parties to that certain time charter party agreement originally dated 20 March 2007 in respect of the Vessel named NEPTUNE, (as amended and/or supplemented from time to time, the "Charter"). Each of TGPL and the Original Party is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Total S.A.

 

(B)The Total group of companies has decided to transfer on 1st September 2019 its LNG trading activity (the "LNG Business") to TGPL in Geneva, including inter alia LNG sale and purchase agreements, charterparty agreements and LNG regasification capacity contracts entered into by the Original Party (the "Transfer").

 

(C)With effect from Effective Date, the Original Party will transfer by novation to TGPL, and TGPL wishes to accept the transfer, by novation, of the Charter.

 

(D)With effect from the Effective Date, the Owner will accept the transfer by novation of, and to accept TGPL as its counterparty to, the Charter

 

THIS DEED WITNESSES as follows:

 

1.INTERPRETATION

 

1.1For the purposes of this deed of novation and amendment (this "Deed"), including its recitals, the capitalised terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:

 

"Comfort Letter" means a comfort letter to be provided by Total in the form set out in Appendix II of this Deed.

 

"Facility Agreement" means a facility agreement originally dated 20 December 2007 (as amended from time to time) and made between, amongst others, (i) the Owner as Borrower, (ii) certain banks and financial institutions as lenders and (iii) DNB Bank ASA (formerly known as DNB Nor Bank ASA) as agent (the "Agent") and security trustee.

 

 

 

 

"Information Sharing Letter" means the information sharing letter to be provided by Total set out in Appendix III of this Deed.

 

"Original Comfort Letter" means the comfort letter dated 13 July 2018 provided to the Owner by Total.

 

"Original Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking dated 13 July 2018 provided to the Owner by Total.

 

"Original Owner's Guarantee" means the owner's guarantee dated 25 March 2010 provided by the Owner's Guarantors to the Original Party.

 

"Owner's Guarantee" means the guarantee provided by the Owner's Guarantors to TGPL.

 

"Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking to be provided to the Owner by Total in the form set out in Appendix I of this Deed.

 

"Total" means Total S.A.

 

1.2Unless defined otherwise, words and expressions used in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in this Deed.

 

1.3The headings in this Deed do not affect its interpretation.

 

1.4References in this Deed to any contract, document or other instrument of any kind (including this Deed) are to that contract, document or other instrument as amended, assigned, novated, restated or replaced from time to time.

 

1.5References in this Deed to any statute, ordinance or other law include all regulations and other instruments and all consolidations, amendments, re-enactments or replacements of such statute, ordinance or other law.

 

2.CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

2.1.1The terms of section 3 of this Deed shall become effective on the date on which all of the following conditions precedent have been satisfied:

 

(a)Total having issued to the Owner the Ownership Undertaking in replacement of the Original Ownership Undertaking previously provided to Owner;

 

(b)Total having issued to the Owner the Comfort Letter in replacement of the Original Comfort Letter previously provided to the Owner;

 

(c)TGPL having issued to the Owner, the Information Sharing Letter;

 

(d)The Owner's Guarantors having issued to TGPL the Owner's Guarantee in replacement of the Original Owner's Guarantee previously provided to the Original Party;

 

(e)The Owner having received, to its satisfaction, evidence of signing authorities from each of the Original Party, TGPL and Total authorising entry into this Deed, the Information Sharing Letter, Ownership Undertaking and the Comfort Letter;

 

(f)TGPL receiving, to its satisfaction, evidence of signing authority of the Owner and the Owner's Guarantors authorising entry into this Deed and the Owner's Guarantee; and

 

 

 

 

(g)the Agent confirming in writing to the Owner the consent of the Majority Lenders (as defined in the Facility Agreement) to the transfer by novation of the Time Charter.

 

where the date on which the above conditions precedent have been satisfied shall be the "Effective Date".

 

2.1.2Promptly upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent under section 2.1.1(d) and (f), the Original Party shall notify the Owner of such satisfaction. Promptly upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent under section 2.1.1(a)-(c), (e) and (g), the Owner shall notify the Original Party of such satisfaction.

 

3.NOVATION

 

3.1With effect from the Effective Date, the Original Party:

 

(a)transfers by novation to TGPL, and TGPL assumes, all of the Original Party's rights, title, benefits, interest, claims and all of the Original Party's obligations and liabilities, under the Charter, in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date; and

 

(b)shall cease to be a party to the Charter for all purposes and TGPL shall become a party to the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.2With effect from the Effective Date, TGPL:

 

(a)undertakes to perform, discharge and observe all obligations and liabilities of the Original Party under the Charter that would, but for this Deed, fall to be performed, discharged or observed by the Original Party; and

 

(b)agrees to be bound by all the provisions of the Charter by which the Original Party would, but for this Deed, be bound.

 

in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date, as if TGPL was named in the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.3With effect from the Effective Date, the Owner:

 

(a)unconditionally releases and discharges the Original Party from complying with, discharging and performing the Charter, and from all liabilities, claims and demands howsoever arising under or in connection with the Charter and whether in contract, tort or otherwise and, in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date;

 

(b)accepts the compliance, discharge and performance by TGPL of the Charter, and the assumption by TGPL of such liabilities, claims and demands, in place of the Original Party; and

 

(c)agrees that TGPL shall be entitled to all rights, powers, interests and benefits under the Charter that would, but for this Deed, subsist in favour of, or be exercisable by, the Original Party as if TGPL were named in the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.4Subject to section 2, the Owner, TGPL and the Original Party agree that this Deed constitutes all actions, confirmations, consents and undertakings required by any of Owner, TGPL and the Original Party under the Charter for the purposes of giving effect to the novation.

 

 

 

 

4.Representations

 

Each Party warrants to the other Parties that the following statements are, as of the Effective Date, true and accurate:

 

4.1it is duly incorporated under the laws of its country of incorporation and has full power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Deed;

 

4.2the execution, delivery and performance by it of this Deed has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate actions and does not contravene any applicable law, regulation or order binding on it or any of its assets or its constitutional documents; and

 

4.3neither the execution, delivery and performance by it of this deed requires the consent or approval of, or the giving of notice to, the registration with, or the taking of any other action in respect of any governmental authority or agency, except those which have been obtained and are in full force and effect.

 

5.Amendments

 

On and from the Effective Date, the Parties agree that:

 

5.1the definition of "Ownership Undertaking" in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read:

 

""Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking provided by Total S.A. in the form set out in Schedule IX."

 

5.2the form of Ownership Undertaking set out in Schedule IX of the Charter shall be replaced in its entirety by the form of Ownership Undertaking set out as Appendix 1 to this Deed.

 

5.3Clause 21(a)(i) of the Charter shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following:

 

"(i) the Charterer may sub-charter the Vessel by time or voyage charter (each a "Sub-Charter") at any time to any person (a "Sub-Charterer") without Owner's consent provided that, as a condition to such sub-chartering, such Sub-Charterer undertakes in form and substance satisfactory to Owner that:

 

(1)in the case of:

 

(A) Sub-Charters of 12 months or more; or

 

(B) Sub-Charterers that are Affiliated Companies of Charterer,

 

such Sub-Charterer's rights are subject and subordinate to Owners' rights under this Charter;

 

(2)any Sub-Charter will include wording consistent with Article 1.6(b) of the Consent & Agreement set forth at Schedule VII; and

 

(3)such Sub-Charterer shall not assert any claim against Owner or Owners' financiers for wrongful interference with its rights (or any similar or equivalent claim) in respect of any actions taken by Owner or Owner's financiers in compliance with this Charter and/or the Consent & Agreement (as the case may be).

 

 

 

 

The Charterer shall always remain responsible for due fulfilment of this Charter notwithstanding any sub-chartering. Any other sub-chartering shall require Owner's prior written consent".

 

5.4Article 1.6 of the form of Consent and Agreement set out in Schedule VII of the Charter shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following:

 

"1.6 Assignment, Transfer, Sub-chartering: The Charterer agrees that in the event the Charterer sub-charters the Vessel (each, a "Sub-Charter") to any person permitted in accordance with the terms of the Charter (each a "Sub-Charterer"), the Charterer shall procure that:

 

(a)such Sub-Charterer shall not assert a claim against the Finance Parties or any of them for wrongful interference with it rights (or any similar or equivalent claim) in respect of any actions taken by the Finance Parties or any of them which are in compliance with this Consent, and to procure that such undertaking by such Sub-Charterer is included in the terms of the relevant Sub-Charter entered into between the Charterer and such person; and

 

(b)in the case of:

 

(i): Sub-Charters of 12 months or more; or

 

(ii): Sub-Charterers that are Affiliated Companies of the Charterer,

 

such Sub-Charterer undertakes that its rights as sub-charterer are subject and subordinate in all respects to the rights of the Finance Parties under this Consent."

 

5.5TGPL's notice details for the purposes of Clause 60 of the Charter are as follows:

 

Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin-Geneva Branch

Route de l'Aeroport 10

1215 Geneva, Switzerland

 

Telephone number: +41 (0)58 710 2200
Fax number: +41 (0)58 710 2202
Attention: General Counsel
Tel No: +41 22710 1112
Email: legalnotices.tgp@total.com

 

5.6All terms and conditions of the Charter, except to the extent modified or changed by this Deed shall remain in full force and effect.

 

6.General

 

6.1This Deed may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same deed, and any party (including any authorised representative of a party) may enter into this Deed by executing a counterpart.

 

6.2A person who is not a party to this Deed may not enforce any of its terms under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

 

 

 

 

6.3Each party shall, at its own expense, do and procure the doing of all things as may be required to give full effect to this Deed, including, without limitation, the execution of all deeds and documents.

 

7.MISCELLANEOUS

 

7.1This Deed shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law.

 

7.2The provisions of Clause 53 of the Charter ("Law and Arbitration") shall apply to this Deed as if set out in full in this Deed with any necessary modifications.

 

IN WITNESS of which this Deed has been executed and has been delivered as a deed on the date written above.

 

EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by GLOBAL
LNG SAS

)

)

 
acting by Jean-Noël Resnard, a duly authorised  signatory

)

)

/s/ Jean-Noël Resnard
in the presence of: )  
     
Witness's Signature /s/ Danielle Lubin    
     
Name: Danielle Lubin    
Address: 10 Avenue Augustine    
                                         92700 Colombes    
     
EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by TOTAL
GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin -
Geneva Branch.

)

)

 
acting by Simon Binet, a director

)

)

/s/ Simon Binet
in the presence of:          Anna Kirk ) Director
     
Witness's Signature /s/ Anna Kirk    
     
Name: Anna Kirk    

Address:

10 Lewisham Road

London SE13 7QR

England

   

 

 

 

 

EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by SRV
JOINT GAS  LTD.

)

)

 
acting by Parit Patani, a duly authorised signatory

)

)

/s/ Parit Patani
in the presence of: )  
     
Witness's Signature   /s/ Hollie Pickering    
     

Name:

Hollie Pickering

Solicitor

   

Address:

Watson Farley & Williams LLP

15 Appold Street

London EC2A 2HB

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Appendix I]

 

[Form of Ownership Undertaking]

 

 

 

 

[Appendix II]

 

[Form of Comfort Letter]

 

 

 

 

[Appendix III]

 

[Form of Information Sharing Letter]

 

 

 

Exhibit 4.25.6

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5

 

 

 

Dated 1 April 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

to

 

SRV LNG CARRIER TIME CHARTERPARTY

(HULL 1688 / NEPTUNE)

 

 

 

between

 

SRV JOINT GAS LTD

 

and

 

TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, LONDON, MEYRIN-GENEVA BRANCH

 

 

 

dated 20 March 2007

 

 

 

 

This amendment no. 5 (the "Amendment No. 5") is made on this 1 day of April 2020

 

BETWEEN

 

(i)SRV Joint Gas Ltd., a company incorporated and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands ("Owner")

 

AND

 

(ii)Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin-Geneva Branch (a branch office of TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED # UK company number 02172239) registered in Geneva, Switzerland under number CHE-309.541.427 ("Charterer")

 

(each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties")

 

RECITALS

 

(A)Disputes have arisen between the Parties under the Time Charterparty originally dated 20 March 2007 as novated by novation agreements dated 20 December 2007, 25 March 2010 and 20 December 2019 and as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated 23 February 2015, Amendment No. 2 dated 23 February 2015, Amendment No. 3 dated 23 April 2014, Amendment No. 4 dated 9 December 2016 and as further novated and/or amended from time to time (the "Charter").

 

(B)In order to settle the disputes, the Parties have agreed that as from the date hereof any claim by Charterer in relation to excess boil-off pursuant to clause 27 of the Charterparty, shall be determined in accordance with the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure annexed hereto.

 

(C)The Parties now wish to enter into this Amendment No. 5 to amend certain provisions of the Charter.

 

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained (and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency the Parties hereby acknowledge), the Parties have agreed as follows:

 

1DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

1.1Terms defined in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment No. 5, unless defined below.

 

1.2The rules of interpretation of the Charter shall apply to this Amendment No. 5 as if set out in this Amendment No. 5.

 

2BOIL-OFF CALCULATION PROCEDURE

 

2.1The Parties agree that:

 

2.1.1The amount ascertained in favour of the Charterer under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure will be the sole remedy in respect of any claims Charterer may have in relation to the maximum daily boil-off under clause 27 from the date hereof.

 

  Page 2

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

2.1.2Charterer shall only be entitled to make deductions from hire in relation to excess boil-off calculated under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure in accordance with the provisions of the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure.

 

2.2The Parties agree that Appendix I Section 7 shall be amended to provide that, for the purpose of any claims pursuant to the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure:

 

2.2.1the Performance Period referred to in Section 7 shall be construed to mean a period of ***** months (or part thereof), the first of which will be deemed to expire at *****.

 

2.2.2The performance of the Vessel shall be assessed within ***** days after each Voyage, using Voyage as defined under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure.

 

3EFFECT OF AMENDMENT

 

Except as specifically provided herein, the Charter, as amended hereby, remains in full force and effect.

 

4GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION

 

Clause 53 of the Charter shall apply to this Amendment No. 5.

 

This Amendment No. 5 has been executed and is delivered and takes effect on the date stated at the beginning of it.

 

Signed by    /s/ Veronica B. Sandnes  
    signature  
for and on behalf of    VERONICA B. SANDNES  
SRV JOINT GAS LTD   print name ATTORNEY-IN-FACT  
       
       
Signed by    /s/ Laurent Vivier  
    signature  
for and on behalf of    Laurent Vivier  
TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, LONDON, MEYRIN-GENEVA BRANCH   print name  

 

  Page 3

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Boil-off gas performance calculation procedure: a contractual code for evaluating the boil off performance of vessel “NEPTUNE” (the “Vessel”)

 

This calculation procedure (the “Boil-Off Calculation Procedure” or the “Procedure”) sets out the contractual code for establishing liability and calculating the relevant deduction from hire for breach of the boil off guarantees under a charterparty dated 20 March 2007 (the “Charter”). Owner and Charterer have agreed this shall be the sole remedy for any claims against Owner for excess boil off.

 

Terms defined in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure unless separately defined below.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Owner and Charterer have agreed to implement this Boil-Off Calculation Procedure to provide for a method of evaluating the boil off performance of the Vessel when operating in LNG carrier mode. The Procedure is based on the following principles:

 

(A)The Vessel’s boil off performance will be assessed after each Voyage.

 

(B)The actual amount of boil off on a Voyage in m3 shall be calculated by subtracting the volume of LNG contained in the Vessel's tanks at gauging after the sea passage while at berth from the volume therein at gauging before the sea passage while at berth (closing CTMS to opening CTMS).

 

(C)The actual boil off calculated pursuant to B above will be converted to MT of HFO equivalent and compared to the boil off gas allowance permitted under this Procedure.

 

(D)Performance will be assessed within ***** days after each Voyage by the respective operational departments, based on data reported by the Master in Owner’s database. If such assessment shows a boil-off performance falling below the performance guaranteed under this Procedure, then subject to paragraph 13 below, the Charterer shall be entitled to a deduction from hire under Clause 12(a) of the Charterparty equal to the value of the excess boil off gas calculated using this Procedure. Any such potential hire deduction for excess boil off will be reconciled immediately after the performance assessment has been completed.

 

(E)Charterer shall be granted access as soon as possible to Owner’s database, which will gather information received from the Vessel that is to be used in this procedure as soon as such capability and relevant platforms are established (the “Database”, containing “Data”). Pending such access being granted, the Owner shall make available to the Charterer an extract of Owner’s database promptly after each Voyage and no later than ***** days after each Voyage.

 

(F)The Parties shall cross check the sum of flow meter readings reported in noon reports over the Voyage with CTMS to CTMS. In cases where a disproportionate discrepancy is observed, each Party shall notify the other and discuss such discrepancies in good faith and in accordance with the Procedure.

 

  Page 4

 

 

(G)The Procedure will not apply to boil off during Adverse Weather Periods and such Periods will be excluded from the performance calculations thereunder.

 

(H)During an Adverse Weather Period, the aggregate of flow meter measurements as reported in m3 of LNG in the Database from engines and GCU (mass flow meter from engines and orifice GCU) and the period between the measurements shall be excluded from the calculations under the Procedure.

 

(I)Boil off performance after the deduction of Adverse Weather Periods (as a percentage of boil off gas (“BOG”) rate calculated over a Voyage) cannot be less favourable for Owner as the calculation without such deduction;

 

(J)BOG resulting from forced vaporization carried out under Charterer’s written instructions shall be accounted for in the Procedure in accordance with the below.

 

FORCED VAPORISATION IN GAS MODE

 

1Forced vaporisation may happen only with Charterers’ written consent.

 

2Speed required to execute a Voyage and the corresponding fuel required to achieve that speed is taken into account in assessing boil off performance when sailing in gas mode only.

 

3The parties recognise the challenges of accurately determining the quantity of LNG used in forced vaporisation because there are several ways in which forced vaporisation is achieved (e.g. by use of the forcing vaporiser, cargo tank spraying with liquid circulation, cofferdam temperature control etc.). Therefore, the Parties agree:

 

3.1not to make deductions from the performance calculations for forced vaporization in the Procedure; and instead

 

3.2to use the below speed versus consumption table to account for theoretical forced vaporization needed to reach any given speed during a Voyage.

 

4For the sake of simplicity, this mechanism shall be used for both laden and ballast Voyages performed in gas mode.

 

VESSEL SPEED VS CONSUMPTION CURVE

 

5The Parties have established a speed versus consumption curve for the sole purpose of the Procedure, as set out in Table A below.

 

6The actual boil off quantity measured during a Voyage in m3 shall be converted into metric tons (MT) of HFO equivalent in accordance with this Procedure, and that figure shall be compared with the accumulated daily fuel consumption derived from Table A (after deductions made for those circumstances excluded from the Procedure). The difference in MT of HFO equivalent between the measured boil off quantity converted in MT of HFO equivalent and the Table A boil off quantity, if positive, is the excess boil off quantity for the purpose of establishing liability under Clause 27 of each Charter respectively and for the purpose of calculating the quantum of the applicable hire deduction in accordance with this Procedure.

 

  Page 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

TABLE A

 

Reference Fuel Consumption Table
In Tons of HFO equivalent per day
kt Laden Ballast
19.5 ***** *****
19 ***** *****
18.5 ***** *****
18 ***** *****
17.5 ***** *****
17 ***** *****
16.5 ***** *****
16 ***** *****
15.5 ***** *****
15 ***** *****
14.5 ***** *****
14 ***** *****

 

EXCLUSIONS

 

7When Charterer gives written orders directing cargo conditioning or tank pressure to be reduced to meet certain discharge terminal requirements, the period from when these particular operations have commenced until the end of the particular Voyage shall be excluded from the calculations hereunder.

 

DUAL FUEL MODE

 

8Charterer at its sole discretion may, from time to time during a Voyage, instruct the Vessel in writing to use dual fuel mode burning in order to avoid forced vaporization and consequently use natural boil off gas (NBOG) supplemented by burning liquid fuel, instead of forcing additional LNG for propulsion.

 

9Consequently, during period of Dual Fuel mode, boil off gas allowance shall be the daily guaranteed NBOG allowance being respectively *****MT/d fuel oil equivalent for ballast Voyage and *****MT/d of fuel oil equivalent in laden Voyage. For the sake of clarity Adverse Weather Periods may apply during a dual fuel mode period and shall be excluded from the calculations in accordance with the provisions set out in this Procedure.

 

  Page 6

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

10Any liquid fuel consumed during periods of dual fuel mode shall be removed from the Boil Off Calculation Procedure for said Voyage.

 

VALUATION OF BOIL OFF GAS IN EXCESS

 

11Where excess boil off on a Voyage is established under this Procedure, such excess boil off will be valued by way of the below calculation.

 

12For the purpose of the Boil Off Calculation Procedure, the energy content of one cubic meter of LNG shall be determined by surveyor report at loading for laden Voyages and at unloading for ballast Voyages and expressed in MMBtu/m3.

 

12.1For Voyages ending east of Suez, the excess boil-off gas shall be valued at the average JKM price published by Platts at the date of Voyage start for the month ahead (Cumulative monthly average for the month ahead – code AAOVS00)

 

12.2For Voyages ending west of Suez, the excess boil-off gas shall be valued at the average TTF price published by Heren at the date of Voyage start for the month ahead. As TTF is published in Euro/MWh (25°C,1atm), the conversion factors to be used to obtain the TTF price in USD/MBtu (25°C1atm) shall be the following:

 

12.31 MWh = 3.4121456 MBtu

 

12.41 MWH (25°C,1atm) = 3.42068432 MBTU (0°C, 1atm)

 

12.51 MWH (25°C,1 atm) = 3.41726706 MBTU (15°C) 1atm)

 

12.6Euro/USD exchange rate of the day of Voyage start published by ECB (https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/policy_and_exchange_rates/euro_referen ce_exchange_rates/html/eurofxref-graph-usd.en.html [ecb.europa.eu])]

 

13The value of excess boil off calculated as above shall be accumulated after each Voyage and settled on a ***** basis (*****) for Voyages completed in preceding ***** months (or part thereof) and if such deduction is agreed by both parties it shall be deducted from hire with ***** hire invoices respectively. In the event of dispute, the undisputed portion (if any) shall be deducted from hire as above, and any disputed portion shall be referred to arbitration under the Charterparty.

 

14The attached Excel worksheets demonstrate how the parties have agreed to perform excess boil off calculations under this Procedure and form part of this Procedure. Excel worksheets calculation method shall prevail in case of dispute with Procedure’s wording.

 

REVIEW OF BOIL OFF GAS PERFORMANCE CALCULATION PROCEDURE

 

15Owner and Charterer shall verify the effectiveness of the Procedure after ***** of implementation.

 

16If required Owner and Charterer shall discuss in good faith and agree on potential adjustments to the Procedure.

 

  Page 7

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

DEFINITIONS

 

Adverse Weather Period” for the purpose of calculating boil off performance under this procedure, means any day, noon to noon, when winds are Force ***** or above on the Beaufort scale for more than ***** hours in aggregate.

 

“BOG” means boil off gas.

 

Forced Vaporisation” means purposefully generating additional boil off solely to provide more fuel”.

 

“Voyage” means a sea passage of the Vessel either in laden or in ballast condition, that starts at closing of CTMS before the Vessel leaves berth at one LNG terminal and ends at the opening of CTMS when the Vessel arrives at berth at the next LNG terminal. A Voyage may or may not be part of a round trip. In case of partial unloading, both ***** leg and the ***** leg shall count as laden Voyages and performance and calculation shall be conducted accordingly.

 

  Page 8

 

 

Exhibit 4.26.3

 

Execution version

 

GLOBAL LNG SAS

 

and

 

TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin - Geneva Branch and

 

AND

 

SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD.

 

  Deed of novation AND AMENDMENT  

 

 

 

 

THIS DEED is made on 20 December 2019

 

BETWEEN:

 

(1)GLOBAL LNG SAS, a French société par actions simplifiée, whose registered office is located at 1, passerelle des Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie (France), registered with the trade and companies register of Nanterre under number 833 285 877 RCS Nanterre (the "Original Party");

 

(2)TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, a company incorporated under the laws of England, with registered office at 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5BF (UK company number 02172239), trading through its branch office TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch, registered under number CHE-309.541.427 and located at Route de l'Aéroport 10, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland ("TGPL"); and

 

(3)SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD., a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with registered address at Clifton House, 75 Fort Street, Grand Cayman KY1-1108, Cayman Islands, and with correspondence address at c/o Höegh LNG AS, Drammensveien 134 NO-0277, Oslo, Norway (the "Owner")

 

(also referred to hereinafter collectively as the "Parties").

 

INTRODUCTION:

 

(A)The Original Party and the Owner are parties to that certain time charter party agreement originally dated 20 March 2007 in respect of the Vessel named CAPE ANN (the Vessel having changed its name from "GDF Suez Cape Ann" to "Cape Ann" on 3 September 2018), (as amended and/or supplemented from time to time, the "Charter"). Each of TGPL and the Original Party is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Total S.A.

 

(B)The Total group of companies has decided to transfer on 1st September 2019 its LNG trading activity (the "LNG Business") to TGPL in Geneva, including inter alia LNG sale and purchase agreements, charterparty agreements and LNG regasification capacity contracts entered into by the Original Party (the "Transfer").

 

(C)With effect from Effective Date, the Original Party will transfer by novation to TGPL, and TGPL wishes to accept the transfer, by novation, of the Charter.

 

(D)With effect from the Effective Date, the Owner will accept the transfer by novation of, and to accept TGPL as its counterparty to, the Charter

 

THIS DEED WITNESSES as follows:

 

1.INTERPRETATION

 

1.1For the purposes of this deed of novation and amendment (this "Deed"), including its recitals, the capitalised terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them below:

 

"Comfort Letter" means a comfort letter to be provided by Total in the form set out in Appendix II of this Deed.

 

"Facility Agreement" means a facility agreement originally dated 20 December 2007 (as amended from time to time) and made between, amongst others, (i) the Owner as Borrower, (ii) certain banks and financial institutions as lenders and (iii) DNB Bank ASA (formerly known as DNB Nor Bank ASA) as agent (the "Agent") and security trustee.

 

 

 

 

"Information Sharing Letter" means the information sharing letter to be provided by Total set out in Appendix III of this Deed.

 

"Original Comfort Letter" means the comfort letter dated 13 July 2018 provided to the Owner by Total.

 

"Original Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking dated 13 July 2018 provided to the Owner by Total.

 

"Original Owner's Guarantee" means the owner's guarantee dated 25 March 2010 provided by the Owner's Guarantors to the Original Party.

 

"Owner's Guarantee" means the guarantee provided by the Owner's Guarantors to TGPL.

 

"Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking to be provided to the Owner by Total in the form set out in Appendix I of this Deed.

 

"Total" means Total S.A.

 

1.2Unless defined otherwise, words and expressions used in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in this Deed.

 

1.3The headings in this Deed do not affect its interpretation.

 

1.4References in this Deed to any contract, document or other instrument of any kind (including this Deed) are to that contract, document or other instrument as amended, assigned, novated, restated or replaced from time to time.

 

1.5References in this Deed to any statute, ordinance or other law include all regulations and other instruments and all consolidations, amendments, re-enactments or replacements of such statute, ordinance or other law.

 

2.CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

2.1.1The terms of section 3 of this Deed shall become effective on the date on which all of the following conditions precedent have been satisfied:

 

(a)Total having issued to the Owner the Ownership Undertaking in replacement of the Original Ownership Undertaking previously provided to Owner;

 

(b)Total having issued to the Owner the Comfort Letter in replacement of the Original Comfort Letter previously provided to the Owner;

 

(c)TGPL having issued to the Owner, the Information Sharing Letter;

 

(d)The Owner's Guarantors having issued to TGPL the Owner's Guarantee in replacement of the Original Owner's Guarantee previously provided to the Original Party;

 

(e)The Owner having received, to its satisfaction, evidence of signing authorities from each of the Original Party, TGPL and Total authorising entry into this Deed, the Information Sharing Letter, Ownership Undertaking and the Comfort Letter;

 

(f)TGPL receiving, to its satisfaction, evidence of signing authority of the Owner and the Owner's Guarantors authorising entry into this Deed and the Owner's Guarantee; and

 

 

 

 

(g)the Agent confirming in writing to the Owner the consent of the Majority Lenders (as defined in the Facility Agreement) to the transfer by novation of the Time Charter.

 

where the date on which the above conditions precedent have been satisfied shall be the "Effective Date".

 

2.1.2Promptly upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent under section 2.1.1(d) and (f), the Original Party shall notify the Owner of such satisfaction. Promptly upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent under section 2.1.1(a)-(c), (e) and (g), the Owner shall notify the Original Party of such satisfaction.

 

3.NOVATION

 

3.1With effect from the Effective Date, the Original Party:

 

(a)transfers by novation to TGPL, and TGPL assumes, all of the Original Party's rights, title, benefits, interest, claims and all of the Original Party's obligations and liabilities, under the Charter, in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date; and

 

(b)shall cease to be a party to the Charter for all purposes and TGPL shall become a party to the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.2With effect from the Effective Date, TGPL:

 

(a)undertakes to perform, discharge and observe all obligations and liabilities of the Original Party under the Charter that would, but for this Deed, fall to be performed, discharged or observed by the Original Party; and

 

(b)agrees to be bound by all the provisions of the Charter by which the Original Party would, but for this Deed, be bound.

 

in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date, as if TGPL was named in the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.3With effect from the Effective Date, the Owner:

 

(a)unconditionally releases and discharges the Original Party from complying with, discharging and performing the Charter, and from all liabilities, claims and demands howsoever arising under or in connection with the Charter and whether in contract, tort or otherwise and, in each case, whether arising before, on or after the Effective Date;

 

(b)accepts the compliance, discharge and performance by TGPL of the Charter, and the assumption by TGPL of such liabilities, claims and demands, in place of the Original Party; and

 

(c)agrees that TGPL shall be entitled to all rights, powers, interests and benefits under the Charter that would, but for this Deed, subsist in favour of, or be exercisable by, the Original Party as if TGPL were named in the Charter in place of the Original Party.

 

3.4Subject to section 2, the Owner, TGPL and the Original Party agree that this Deed constitutes all actions, confirmations, consents and undertakings required by any of Owner, TGPL and the Original Party under the Charter for the purposes of giving effect to the novation.

 

 

 

 

4.Representations

 

Each Party warrants to the other Parties that the following statements are, as of the Effective Date, true and accurate:

 

4.1it is duly incorporated under the laws of its country of incorporation and has full power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Deed;

 

4.2the execution, delivery and performance by it of this Deed has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate actions and does not contravene any applicable law, regulation or order binding on it or any of its assets or its constitutional documents; and

 

4.3neither the execution, delivery and performance by it of this deed requires the consent or approval of, or the giving of notice to, the registration with, or the taking of any other action in respect of any governmental authority or agency, except those which have been obtained and are in full force and effect.

 

5.Amendments

 

On and from the Effective Date, the Parties agree that:

 

5.1the definition of "Ownership Undertaking" in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read:

 

""Ownership Undertaking" means the letter of undertaking provided by Total S.A. in the form set out in Schedule IX."

  

5.2the form of Ownership Undertaking set out in Schedule IX of the Charter shall be replaced in its entirety by the form of Ownership Undertaking set out as Appendix 1 to this Deed.

 

5.3Clause 21(a)(i) of the Charter shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following:

 

"(i) the Charterer may sub-charter the Vessel by time or voyage charter (each a "Sub-Charter") at any time to any person (a "Sub-Charterer") without Owner's consent provided that, as a condition to such sub-chartering, such Sub-Charterer undertakes in form and substance satisfactory to Owner that:

 

(1)in the case of:

 

(A) Sub-Charters of 12 months or more; or

 

(B) Sub-Charterers that are Affiliated Companies of Charterer,

 

such Sub-Charterer's rights are subject and subordinate to Owners' rights under this Charter;

 

(2)any Sub-Charter will include wording consistent with Article 1.6(b) of the Consent & Agreement set forth at Schedule VII; and

 

(3)such Sub-Charterer shall not assert any claim against Owner or Owners' financiers for wrongful interference with its rights (or any similar or equivalent claim) in respect of any actions taken by Owner or Owner's financiers in compliance with this Charter and/or the Consent & Agreement (as the case may be).

 

 

 

 

The Charterer shall always remain responsible for due fulfilment of this Charter notwithstanding any sub-chartering. Any other sub-chartering shall require Owner's prior written consent".

 

5.4Article 1.6 of the form of Consent and Agreement set out in Schedule VII of the Charter shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with the following:

 

"1.6 Assignment, Transfer, Sub-chartering: The Charterer agrees that in the event the Charterer sub-charters the Vessel (each, a "Sub-Charter") to any person permitted in accordance with the terms of the Charter (each a "Sub-Charterer"), the Charterer shall procure that:

 

(a)such Sub-Charterer shall not assert a claim against the Finance Parties or any of them for wrongful interference with it rights (or any similar or equivalent claim) in respect of any actions taken by the Finance Parties or any of them which are in compliance with this Consent, and to procure that such undertaking by such Sub-Charterer is included in the terms of the relevant Sub-Charter entered into between the Charterer and such person; and

 

(b)in the case of:

 

(i): Sub-Charters of 12 months or more; or

 

(ii): Sub-Charterers that are Affiliated Companies of the Charterer,

 

such Sub-Charterer undertakes that its rights as sub-charterer are subject and subordinate in all respects to the rights of the Finance Parties under this Consent."

 

5.5TGPL's notice details for the purposes of Clause 60 of the Charter are as follows:

 

Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin-Geneva Branch

Route de l'Aeroport 10

1215 Geneva, Switzerland

 

Telephone number: +41 (0)58 710 2200
Fax number: +41 (0)58 710 2202
Attention: General Counsel
Tel No: +41 22710 1112
Email: legalnotices.tgp@total.com

  

5.6All terms and conditions of the Charter, except to the extent modified or changed by this Deed shall remain in full force and effect.

 

6.General

 

6.1This Deed may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same deed, and any party (including any authorised representative of a party) may enter into this Deed by executing a counterpart.

 

6.2A person who is not a party to this Deed may not enforce any of its terms under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.

 

 

 

 

6.3Each party shall, at its own expense, do and procure the doing of all things as may be required to give full effect to this Deed, including, without limitation, the execution of all deeds and documents.

 

7.MISCELLANEOUS

 

7.1This Deed shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law.

 

7.2The provisions of Clause 53 of the Charter ("Law and Arbitration") shall apply to this Deed as if set out in full in this Deed with any necessary modifications.

 

IN WITNESS of which this Deed has been executed and has been delivered as a deed on the date written above.

 

EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by GLOBAL
LNG SAS

)

)

 
acting by Jean-Noël Resnard, a duly authorised signatory

)

)

/s/ Jean-Noël Resnard
in the presence of: )  
     
Witness's Signature /s/ Danielle Lubin    
     
Name: Danielle Lubin    
Address: 10 Avenue Augustine    

 

92700 Colombes

France

   
     
EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by TOTAL
GAS & POWER LIMITED, London, Meyrin -
Geneva Branch.

)

)

 
acting by Simon Binet, a director

)

)

/s/ Simon Binet
in the presence of:          Anna Kirk ) Director
     
Witness's Signature /s/ Anna Kirk    
     
Name: Anna Kirk    

Address:

10 Lewisham Road

London SE13 7QR

England

   

 

 

 

 

EXECUTED AND DELIVERED as a deed by SRV
JOINT GAS TWO LTD.

)

)

 
acting by Parit Patani, a duly authorised signatory

)

)

/s/ Parit Patani
in the presence of: )  
     
Witness's Signature /s/ Hollie Pickering    
     

Name:

Hollie Pickering

Solicitor

   

Address:

Watson Farley & Williams LLP

15 Appold Street

London EC2A 2HB

   

 

 

 

 

[Appendix I]

 

[Form of Ownership Undertaking]

 

 

 

 

[Appendix II]

 

[Form of Comfort Letter]

 

 

 

 

[Appendix III]

 

[Form of Information Sharing Letter]

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 4.26.4

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5

 

To

 

SRV LNG CARRIER

 

TIME CHARTERPARTY

 

DATED 20 March 2007

 



Between

SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD

And

TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED,

London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch




DATED 18 February 2020

 

 

 

 Page 1 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO SRV LNG CARRIER TIME CHARTERPARTY

 

This amendment no. 5 (“Amendment No. 5”) to the Charter (as defined in the Recitals below) is made on this 18th of February 2020 and forms an integral part of the Charter as set out in Clause 2 of this Amendment No. 5.

 

BY AND BETWEEN:

 

(i)SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands (“Owner”); and

 

(ii)Total Gas & Power Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England, with registered office at 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5BF (UK company number 02172239), trading through its branch office Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch, registered under number CHE-309.541.427 and located at Route de l’Aéroport 10, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland (“Charterer”);

 

(each a “Party” and together the “Parties”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, Owner and Charterer have entered into an SRV LNG Carrier Time Charterparty dated 20 March 2007, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated 20 June 2012 (“Amendment No. 1”), Amendment No .2 dated 20 June 2012 (“Amendment No. 2”)and Amendment No.3 dated 23 April 2014 (“Amendment No. 3”), Amendment No. 4 dated 23 October 2017 (“Amendment No. 4”), and as novated and amended pursuant to a deed of novation and amendment dated 20 December 2019, and as may be further novated, assigned and/or amended from time to time, (the “Charter”), whereby Owner has agreed to let and Charterer has agreed to hire the use and service of a Shuttle and Regasification Vessel built by Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. with reference Hull no. 1689 and now named Cape Ann (the “Vessel”);

 

WHEREAS, Charterer wishes to use the Vessel in FSRU Mode at the FSRU Terminal in India or alternatively in LNG Carrier Mode under the Project Agreement with Project Sub-Charterer for the Project; and

 

WHEREAS, Owner is willing to accommodate Charterer’s wish to use the Vessel in FSRU Mode and to accept that Charterer uses her for the Project, on the terms and subject to the conditions of this Amendment No. 5;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, Owner and Charterer agree as follows:

 

 Page 2 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

1.Definitions

 

For purposes of this Amendment No. 5 (including the Recitals), the capitalized terms either (i) used but not defined in this Amendment No. 5 or (ii) amended by Clause 5 of this Amendment No. 5 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Charter.

 

“Acceptable Bank” means an international commercial banking institution (i) which at the time of that the applicable Letter of Credit or its amendment is delivered to Owner, and throughout its term, has a long-term senior unsecured and non-credit enhanced debt rating of at least the lower of A- by Standard & Poor’s or A3 by Moody’s, or equivalent rating of another rating agency of comparable standing or (ii) if it does not satisfy the credit rating requirement, is otherwise acceptable to the Owner.

 

“Acceptable Guarantor” means any guarantor from the Charterer’s Group which (i) satisfies the New Worth Requirement or (ii) if it does not satisfy the Net Worth Requirement, is otherwise reasonably acceptable to the Owner.

“Amendment Agreements” means each of Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, Amendment No.3 and Amendment No. 4, and “Amendment Agreement” means any one of them.

 

“Approvals” means national and local authorizations, licenses, permits, approvals, exemptions or similar instruments that will need to be obtained from and/or granted by any governmental authorities in India from time to time required for the performance of this Amendment No. 5.

 

“BWM Convention” means the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments 2004, as adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

 

“BWTS” means a management system for the treatment of a ship’s ballast water compliant with the BWM Convention.

 

“Charterer’s Items” means any Long Lead Items to which Charterer has received title in accordance with Clause 3.7 of the LLI Agreement (or as otherwise agreed between the Parties), or any items defined as such in any supplemental agreement (as the case may be), or any other equipment incorporated onto the Vessel requested by Charterer for which title is vested in Charterer.

 

“Credit Support” means, at the Charterer’s election, a Letter of Credit or a Guarantee, as applicable, or a combination of Letter(s) of Credit and Guarantee(s).

 

“Credit Support Default” means:

 

(a)an Acceptable Bank or an Acceptable Guarantor disaffirms, disclaims, revokes, repudiates or rejects, in whole or in part, or challenges the validity of any Credit Support provided by it or otherwise fails to comply with or perform its obligations under such Credit Support;

 

 Page 3 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(b)Charterer fails to provide or maintain the Credit Support in accordance with this Amendment 5;
(c)any Acceptable Bank ceases to be an Acceptable Bank;
(d)any Acceptable Guarantor ceases to be an Acceptable Guarantor;
(e)in respect of any Letter of Credit, such Letter of Credit expires or terminates with respect to any outstanding obligations of Charterer (as the case may be) under this Amendment 5, or is set to expire or terminate within ***** (*****) Business Days and has not been replaced by another Letter of Credit; or
(f)any Credit Support fails or ceases to be in full force and effect for the purpose of this Amendment No. 5, (in each case other than in accordance with its terms or the terms of this Amendment No. 5).

 

“FSRU” means floating storage and regasification unit.

 

“FSRU Mode” means the use of the Vessel at all times during the Project Period, except when a Voyage is occurring.

 

“FSRU Terminal” means the Jaigarh Port FSRU terminal located in India.

 

“Guarantee” means a payment guarantee, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Owner, executed by an Acceptable Guarantor in favour of Owner, and delivered to Owner, to the extent required pursuant to Clause 8.3 of this Amendment No. 5.

“Indian Taxes” means all tax liabilities in India specifically suffered or incurred directly or indirectly by law or contractually by Owner or any other member of Owner Covered Group whatsoever and howsoever arising due to the presence of the Vessel as an FSRU in India when the Vessel acts in FSRU Mode, including but not limited to business tax, corporate tax, corporate income tax, local surcharges, wealth tax, income tax and individual income tax, personal tax or social security contributions of employees or crew members, social security premiums, customs taxes or duties, VAT/GST or other indirect taxes, withholding tax (including on hire, loan repayments, interest and dividends), any municipal, provincial or state taxes, any tax relating to the importation, stay or exportation into and from India (as the case may be) of the Vessel (including related materials and/or equipment) and any penalty or interest payable in connection with any failure to pay or any delay in paying or reporting any of the same, together with all compliance and filing costs relating to such taxes;

 

“Letter of Credit” means an irrevocable standby letter of credit (a) issued by an Acceptable Bank; (b) in form and substance reasonably acceptable to Owner; (c) has Owner as the sole named beneficiary; and (d) that is delivered to Owner, to the extent required pursuant to Clause 8.3 of this Amendment No. 5.

 

 Page 4 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

“LLI Agreement” means the agreement for procurement of long lead items and project activities relating to the Vessel dated 31 January 2018 and made between the Owner and the Charterer (the “Original LLI Agreement”), as supplemented by a supplement agreement dated 27 July 2018 together with any subsequent amendments or supplements thereto.

 

“LLI Suppliers” means the suppliers of Long Lead Items, supplying such pursuant to the respective Supply Contracts entered into between the Owner and each LLI Supplier.

 

“Long Lead Items” has the meaning given to it in the LLI Agreement.

 

“LNG Carrier Mode” has the meaning given to it in Clause 6 (“Voyage”) of this Amendment No. 5.

 

“Maintenance Allowance” has the meaning given to it in Clause 25 (as amended by this Amendment No. 5).

 

“Modification Specification” has the meaning given to it in the LLI Agreement.

 

“Modification Work” means any and all work; design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, installation, commissioning and testing; required for the modification of the Vessel as requested by the Charterer, which shall include the work defined as “Project Activities” and “Modification Work” in the LLI Agreement, the Long Lead Items and any further required installation or testing of same, and the final completion and commissioning of such at the FSRU Terminal.

 

“Modification Yard” has the meaning given to it in the LLI Agreement.

 

“Mortgagee” means DnB Bank ASA as agent on behalf of the lenders.

 

“Net Worth” means the sum of all paid up shareholder cash contributions to the share capital account or any other capital account of a relevant person and any accumulated retained earnings less accumulated retained losses and any intangible assets including but not limited to goodwill.

 

“Net Worth Requirement” means a Net Worth of not less than ***** United States Dollars (USD *****), or its equivalent in any other currency.

 

“Operations Manual” means the document entitled “Cape Ann – FRSU Operations Manual” signed and/or otherwise acknowledged by Owner (and/or Manager) and/or Charterer and/or Project Sub-Charterer, as the same may be amended or updated from time to time.

 

 Page 5 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

“Owner Covered Group” means Owner or its successor in application of the provisions of Clause 21(b) of the Charter, Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., Höegh LNG Ltd., Höegh LNG AS, Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS, Höegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K Lines, Ltd., Tokyo LNG Tanker Co. Ltd., Höegh LNG Partners L.P and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC and such other directly or indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. that is providing management services to the Owner in relation to the Vessel, and for the purposes of Clause 8.2 of this Amendment No. 5 only, such term includes any employees or other officers of the companies listed above or any master, officers or crew employed upon the Vessel.

 

“Owner’s Permits Matrix” means a document listing the Approvals that the Owner is obliged to obtain pursuant to the terms of this Amendment No. 5, as attached as Appendix 3.

 

“Port Operator” means JSW Jaigarh Port Limited, or such other entity as operates the port of the FSRU Terminal.

 

“Project” means Charterer’s project with Project Sub-Charterer, consisting of using the Vessel in FSRU Mode at the FSRU Terminal (or otherwise in LNG Carrier Mode).

 

“Project Agreement” means the agreements signed or to be signed by and between Charterer and Project Sub-Charterer for the provision of FSRU services by Charterer to Project Sub-Charterer.

 

“Project Period” means the period of time beginning at the delivery of the Vessel by Charterer to Project Sub-Charterer at the FSRU Terminal in accordance with the Project Agreement and ending on the date that physical redelivery of the Vessel by Project Sub-Charterer to Charterer has occurred in accordance with the Project Agreement.

 

“Project Sub-Charterer” means Western Concessions Private Limited.

 

“Reinstatement Specification” means the scope of work mutually agreed between Parties so that the Vessel is fitted in every way as an SRV for service under the Charter as further set out in Clause 7.

 

“Reinstatement Work” means (i) any and all work; design, engineering, procurement, fabrication, installation, commissioning and testing required to reinstate the Vessel in accordance with the Reinstatement Specification and (ii) dry-docking, cleaning and painting of the Vessel’s bottom and effecting scheduled maintenance, so that the Vessel is fitted in every way for service under the Charter.

 

“Reinstatement Yard” means such yard as mutually agreed between the Parties for the performance of the Reinstatement Work.

 

“Shipyard Contract” has the meaning given to it in the LLI Agreement.

 

“Supply Contract” has the meaning given to it in the LLI Agreement.

 

 Page 6 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

“Voyage” means a legitimate voyage under the Charter ordered pursuant to and in accordance with Clause 6 of this Amendment No. 5, the duration of which shall always be deemed to be from when the Vessel is unmoored and disconnected from the FSRU Terminal for the purpose of commencing the Voyage until the Vessel is all fast again at the FSRU Terminal.

 

 Page 7 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

2.Purpose, Intention and Interpretations

 

The purpose of this Amendment No. 5 is to set forth the terms and conditions under which Charterer may utilize the Vessel as an FSRU at the Project and to set out the specific conditions applicable between the Parties when the Vessel is used in FSRU Mode and specific amendments in Clause 6 and 7 of this Amendment No. 5 relating to the Vessel’s use in LNG Carrier Mode, including any Modification Work and Reinstatement Work to be carried out pursuant to Clause 3 and 7 of this Amendment No. 5 respectively.

 

It is Owner’s and Charterer’s clear intention, which is hereby declared, that none of Charterer’s entry into the Project Agreement, Owner’s entry into this Amendment No. 5, or the Parties entry into any other document pursuant to or in connection with the Project, the Project Agreement or this Amendment No. 5, shall imply or impose greater or more onerous, or lesser or less onerous, obligations, exposures and/or liabilities on Owner or any member of Owner Covered Group (except for the undertaking to arrange for the Modification Work and the Reinstatement Work, respectively and except for any other provisions of this Amendment No. 5 directly or indirectly providing to the contrary) than it would otherwise have under the Charter.

 

In case of conflict between the provisions of the Charter and this Amendment No. 5, the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 shall prevail, and the provisions of this Amendment No. 5 shall, to the extent required to give effect to the rights, obligations and liabilities set out in this Amendment No. 5, survive the expiration or termination of the Project Period.

 

3.Modification Work

 

3.1Pursuant to the LLI Agreement, Owner has procured the Long Lead Items and carried out Modification Work at the Modification Yard in accordance with the Modification Specification. Owner will complete the Modification Work, including final commissioning of Long Lead Items, at the FSRU Terminal, and the provisions of the LLI Agreement shall apply with respect to the completion of the Modification Work.

 

3.2All costs and expenses incurred by Owner under the Supply Contracts or the Shipyard Contract in relation to the Modification Work shall be for Charterer’s account and Charterer shall compensate Owner for such costs in accordance with Clauses 3.5, 3.6, 5 and 6 of the Original LLI Agreement, and Charterer shall compensate Owner for other reasonable and documented costs incurred by Owner related to the Modification Work, including in respect of completion by commissioning at the FSRU Terminal, on the basis that all work carried out by Owner in relation to the Modification Work comprises part of the “Project Activities” defined in the LLI Agreement and the Charterer shall reimburse the Owner for such costs in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 4.3, 5 and 6 of the Original LLI Agreement.

 

3.3As the Modification Work is carried out at Charterer's risk (as well as time and expense) as set out in the LLI Agreement and Charterer agrees to indemnify and hold Owner Group harmless from any charges, expenses, claims, liabilities and losses whatsoever which Owner Group may incur as a consequence of any of the Supply Contracts or the Shipyard Contract to the extent that it relates to the Modification Work (including any charges, expenses, claims, liabilities and losses arising from a breach by any LLI Supplier of any terms of a Supply Contract or breach by the Shipyard of any terms of the Shipyard Contract relating to the Modification Work), and for the avoidance of doubt, that exceed charges, costs, expenses claims, liabilities and losses that Owner Group would otherwise been liable for under the Charter, save for to the extent that such charges, expenses, claims, liabilities and losses is caused by Owner's failure to carry out its duties related to the Modification Work to the standard of a reasonable and prudent operator and/or relates to Owners Work (as defined in the LLI Agreement). It is confirmed, clarified and agreed that the indemnities in this Clause 3.3 shall apply notwithstanding the indemnity contained within Clause 68 of the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5) and Clause 8.1 of this Amendment No. 5; and (ii) shall extend to and for the benefit or each member of the Owner Group and that each member of Owner Group shall have the benefit of and may enforce those provisions.

 

 Page 8 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

3.4For the purposes of this Clause 3 and corresponding with the LLI Agreement, “Owner Group” means the Owner and Owner’s managers Höegh LNG AS and Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS and, to the extent directly involved in the Modification Work, their affiliates and subcontractors.

 

3.5If additional modification works are requested by Charterer during the Project Period, Owner and Charterer shall mutually agree the scope and specification of such modification works. Such additional modification works shall be considered Modification Work for the purposes of this Amendment No. 5 and, subject to a separate supplemental agreement between the Parties, Owner shall arrange for such Modification Work to be carried out for Charterer’s time, risk and expense and Charterer shall reimburse Owner for the documented cost of such Modification Work and compensate Owner for Owner’s own reasonable and documented cost related to such Modification Work to the extent not covered by paragraph 1.2 of Schedule III of the Charter (as amended by Amendment No.1 and Amendment No.3).

 

3.6Owner shall (i) maintain Charterer’s Items in accordance with Clause 4 ("Duty to Maintain") of the Charter and (ii) insure Charterer’s Items under the Vessel's "Hull and Machinery Insurance" in accordance with Clause 8 ("Owner to Provide") of the Charter, at values mutually agreed between Charterer and Owner.

 

3.7Owner shall have no responsibility or liability to Charterer in the event that the Vessel fails to comply with any applicable regulation and/or requirement of any Primary Terminal where such failure is directly caused by any Modification Work or Charterer’s Items.

 

3.8If as a result of the Modification Work carried out by Owner under this Clause 3, the details contained within Appendix 1 of this Amendment No. 5 should change, Appendix 1 shall be replaced with an updated Gas Form C.

 

 Page 9 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

4.Importation, Stay and Exportation

 

4.1Any importation, stay and exportation into and from India (as the case may be) of the Vessel and all materials and/or equipment necessary for Owner’s performance of the Charter and/or any Voyage during or related to the Project Period, shall be arranged by Charterer, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, for its own time, risk and expense, but with all reasonable practical assistance from Owner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where Charterer and Owner mutually agree in advance, Owner may arrange such materials and/or equipment necessary for its performance of the Charter, but even in such case, all time, risk and expense shall be for Charterer’s account.

 

4.2Subject always to the provisions of Clauses 8 and 9 of this Amendment No. 5, Clause 30(a) of the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5), Owner shall, at Charterer’s expense and with all reasonable practical assistance from Charterer, apply for and obtain the Approvals listed in the Owner’s Permits Matrix.

 

4.3Furthermore, if requested to do so by the Charterer, the Owner shall apply for and obtain all necessary Approvals which can only be applied for and obtained by Owner, or an applicable member of the Owner Group, in its name. However, Owner shall have no liability towards Charterer if it fails to obtain any such Approval unless the failure to obtain is caused by the action or inaction of Owner or the applicable member of Owner Group, including the failure to apply for or follow the necessary procedures to obtain such Approvals.

 

4.4Other than the Approvals that the Owner is to obtain in compliance with the Owner’s Permits Matrix, or as required above, the Charterer shall for its own, time, risk and expense (but with all reasonable practical assistance from Owner) obtain and maintain throughout the Project Period all other Approvals that are (i) required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations applicable to it and to the Vessel’s operation in India in FSRU Mode, including any exemption from any requirement to obtain work permits for any employees or other officers of any applicable member of the Owner Covered Group or any master, officers or crew employed upon the Vessel, (ii) required to enable Owner and any member of the Owner Covered Group to operate the Vessel in accordance with the provisions of this Amendment No. 5; or (iii) otherwise required under this Amendment.

 

4.5Each Party shall provide assistance and information as is reasonably requested and required by the other Party to obtain and maintain an Approval for which that Party is responsible. The Party responsible for obtaining the relevant Approval shall ensure that any information received from the other Party is correctly applied.

 

4.6For the avoidance of doubt, Owner shall not be required to change the Vessel’s flag or registry.

 

 Page 10 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

5.FSRU Mode specific modifications

 

5.1At all times during the Project Period, except when a Voyage is occurring, the Charter shall be modified by the following amendments, additions and other modifications:

 

(a)Modifications to Clause 1 (“Definitions”) of the Charter:

 

i.The definition of “Actual Discharge Rate” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: “Actual Discharge Rate” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

ii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Additional Services” means (i) the discharge of bulk LNG from the Vessel to onshore LNG storage tanks, LNG tanker trucks or LNG bunker vessels and (ii) any other additional services, requested by Charterer and performed by Owner, not contemplated by the Charter.”

 

iii.The definition of “Adverse Weather Periods” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted and amended to read in its entirety “Adverse Weather Periods” means the period of time during which Adverse Weather Conditions are experienced.

 

iv.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter which reads: Adverse Weather Conditions” means weather and/or sea conditions forecast or experienced which exceed the weather and/or sea limits set out in any port operations manual (including the Operations Manual) applicable at the FSRU Terminal; and/or during which the master (a) moves or removes or disconnects from berth the Vessel for reasons of safety of the Vessel and/or the safety of those on board the Vessel or LNG Carrier; and/or (b) orders a full or partial cessation of operations on the Vessel.”

 

v.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Amendment No. 5” means Amendment No. 5 to this Charter dated 18 February 2020 and made between Owner and Charterer.”

 

vi.The definition of “Allowance Period” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

vii.The definition of “BOE” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

viii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads ““BWM Convention” has the meaning set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No. 5”.

 

ix.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads “BWTS” has the meaning set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No. 5.”

 

 Page 11 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

x.The definition of “Discharge Period” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted. Any other use of the term “Discharge Period” in the Charter shall be replaced with the term “FSRU Discharge Period”.

 

xi.The definition of “Discharge Point” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

xii.The definition of “Downstream Systems” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: “”Downstream Systems” means all infrastructure and systems downstream of the Vessel’s high-pressure export manifold.“

 

xiii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““FSRU” means floating storage and regasification unit.”

 

xiv.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““FSRU Discharge Period” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b)”

 

xv.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““FSRU Gas Day” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

xvi.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures” means the procedures for requesting and establishing Send Out Profile and Intraday Nominations, which the Parties shall use reasonable endeavours to negotiate and agree prior to the start of the Project Period, and once agreed shall be set forth in a new Schedule X.”

 

xvii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““FSRU Terminal” means the Jaigarh FSRU terminal located in India.”

 

xviii.The definition of “Gas Day” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted. Any other use of the term “Gas Day” in the Charter shall be replaced with the term “FSRU Gas Day”.

 

xix.The definition of “Gas Nomination Procedures” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted. Any other use of the term “Gas Nomination Procedures” in the Charter shall be replaced with the term “FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures”.

 

xx.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads Intraday Nomination” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

xxi.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Maintenance Allowance” has the meaning set out in Clause 25(d).”

 

xxii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads “Modification Work” has the meaning set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No. 5.”

 

 Page 12 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

xxiii.The definition of “Nominated Discharge Rate” Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: ““Nominated Discharge Rate” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

xxiv.The definition of “Normal Performance” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: ““Normal Performance” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

xxv.The definition of “Off-hire Allowance” in Clause 2 shall be deleted.

 

xxvi.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Operations Manual” means the document entitled “Cape Ann – FRSU Operations Manual” signed and/or otherwise acknowledged by Owner (and/or Manager) and/or Charterer and/or Project Sub-Charterer, as the same may be amended or updated from time to time.”

 

xxvii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Owner Covered Group” means has the meaning set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No. 5.”

 

xxviii.The definition of “Performance Period” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

xxix.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Port Operator” means JSW Jaigarh Port Limited., or such other entity as operates the port of the FSRU Terminal.”

 

xxx.The definitions of “Primary Terminals” and “Primary Terminal” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

xxxi.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Project Agreement” has the meanings set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No.5.”

 

xxxii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Project Period” has the meaning set out in Clause 1 of Amendment No. 5.

 

xxxiii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Project Sub-Charterer” means Western Concessions Private Limited.”

 

xxxiv.The definition of “Reduced Performance” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: ““Reduced Performance” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b).”

 

xxxv.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Reduced Rate” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b)”.

 

 Page 13 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

xxxvi.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Maintenance” has the meaning set out in Clause 25 (d)”.

 

xxxvii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Renewal Work” has the meaning set out in Clause 25 (d)”.

 

xxxviii.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: ““Renewal Period” means a period of ***** (*****) years counted from the date of the last special survey (normal five (5) year class renewal period).”

 

xxxix.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Send Out Profile” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b)”.

 

xl.A new definition shall be included in Clause 1 of the Charter, which reads: “Start Up Period” has the meaning set out in Clause 27(b)”.

 

xli.The definition of “Unscheduled Maintenance” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

xlii.The definition of “Unscheduled Maintenance Allowance” in Clause 1 of the Charter shall be deleted.

 

(b)In Clause 3 (a)(i) of the Charter, the reference to “SRV” shall be amended to read: “FSRU”.

 

(c)Clause 3 a) of the Charter shall be completed with the following bullet point:

 

“(vi)the master and chief officer combined shall have not less than a total of ***** (*****) months’ sailing and cargo operations experience in the past ***** (*****) years exercising responsibilities of a senior rank (master and/or chief officer) on board an LNG tanker/FSRU. The chief engineer, cargo engineer and second engineer shall combined have not less than a total of ***** (*****) months’ sailing and cargo operations experience in the past ***** (*****) years exercising responsibilities of a senior rank (chief engineer, cargo engineer and/or second engineer) on board an LNG tanker/FSRU.”

 

(d)Clause 5 of the Charter (“Period and Trading Limits”) shall be amended by the addition of the following new sub-clauses (d), (e), (f), (g) and (h):

 

“(d)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Clauses 5(a), (b), and (c), Charterer shall, at no expense to Owner, provide or cause to be provided, at

 

 Page 14 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

the FSRU Terminal, port and marine facilities capable of receiving the Vessel
and berths and places which the Vessel can safely reach and return from without exposure to danger, and at which the Vessel can safely lie, load or discharge (as the case may be) always afloat. Furthermore, Charterer shall provide to Owner all relevant information required to meet the interface requirements of the FSRU Terminal as soon as reasonably possible. All reasonable costs incurred in implementing such modifications to the Vessel (and their later removal, if required to comply with the terms of this Charter), including the time taken to implement such modifications and to comply with such regulations necessary to allow the Vessel to load or discharge at the FSRU Terminal, shall be for Charterer’s account and shall be reimbursed to Owner in accordance with Schedule III. Charterer shall also be responsible, and shall reimburse Owner in accordance with Schedule III, for all such reasonable costs incurred, including the necessary time taken, should the interface requirements of or the regulations applicable to the FSRU Terminal be altered.

 

(e)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Charter, Owner shall not under any circumstances whatsoever be obliged to go to and/or stay at an FSRU Terminal which has not entered into a port liability agreement or conditions of use, acceptable to Owner’s P&I Club, with Owner.

 

(f)Charterer shall ensure that each visiting LNG carrier is compatible in all respects with the FRSU and its ship-to-ship transfer system, and Charterer shall pay Owner US$ ***** lumpsum fee for each ship-to-ship compatibility study that Owner undertakes in order to check the compatibility of each LNG carrier with the FSRU and its ship-to-ship transfer system on an LNG carrier’s first visit to the FSRU at the FSRU Terminal or if an LNG carrier has been modified since the compatibility study undertaken on such LNG carrier’s first visit to the FSRU at the FSRU Terminal. If such ship-to-ship compatibility study is in relation to a sister ship to an LNG carrier for which a compatibility study has already been carried out, then the lumpsum fee payable by Charterer shall be reduced to US$ ***** . Furthermore, Charterer shall pay Owner US$ ***** lumpsum fee for any ship-to-ship compatibility study undertaken in respect of an LNG carrier’s subsequent visit to the FSRU at the FSRU Terminal, provided that such LNG carrier has not been modified since its last visit. Charterer shall not be liable for any cost or expense in relation to such compatibility studies in excess of the relevant lumpsum fee.

 

(g)Notwithstanding the provisions of Clause 5(a) above, it is acknowledged that during the Project Period, the Vessel will not conform to the BWM Convention

 

 Page 15 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

and therefore will not be compliant with the regulations necessary to allow the Vessel to load or discharge at terminals located in the United States of America until such time as the Vessel has installed a BWTS in accordance with either Clauses 7.2 or 9.6 of Amendment No. 5.

 

(h)During the Project Period, the Charterer may request and Owner shall carry out the Additional Services, on the proviso that

 

(i)any additional costs to Owner in carrying out any such service will be for Charterer’s account, and

 

(ii)the performance warranties set out in Clause 27 (“Performance”) of this Charter (as amended by Amendment No. 5) shall not apply on any FSRU Gas Day during which any Additional Services is undertaken, to the extent the performances warranted are adversely affected by the performance of Additional Services or any activities in relation thereto or consequences thereof;

 

(iii)and Additional Service as described in sub-clause (ii) of the definition thereof shall be agreed to be carried out by Owner in its sole discretion.”

 

(e)Clause 8 (“Owner to Provide”) of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety:

 

“(a)Owner undertakes to provide and, subject to the provisions of Schedule III, to pay for all provisions, wages (including but not limited to all overtime payments, statutory or otherwise), and shipping and discharging fees and all other expenses of the master, officers and crew,), except in the case of Indian officers and/or crew and/or cadets on the Vessel in each case as may be required by applicable law or regulation in which case such Indian officers, crew and/or cadets shall be procured and provided by Owner and the costs of such Indian officers, crew and/or cadets shall be reimbursed by Charterer to Owner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner shall use reasonable endeavours to minimize the costs of such Indian officers, crew and/or cadets that Owner is obliged to provide in accordance with this Clause, and in this regard, if an officer assigned to the Vessel is replaced by an officer which cannot immediately be re-assigned to another vessel in the Höegh LNG fleet, then Charterer shall pay the standby wages for that officer up to a maximum of ***** weeks after the date of replacement; also, except as provided in Clauses 5 and 37, for all insurance on the Vessel described in Schedule IV, for all deck, cabin and engine-room stores and necessary spare parts, and for water; for all dry-docking (and gas-freeing of the Vessel associated therewith), overhaul, maintenance and repairs to the Vessel, including maintaining and operating the Vessel in good

 

 Page 16 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

working order in accordance with prudent industry practices and Builder’s maintenance recommendations; and for all fumigation expenses and de-rat certificates. Owner’s obligations under this Clause 8 extend to all liabilities for customs or import duties arising at any time during the performance of this Charter in relation to the personal effects of the master, officers and crew, and in relation to the stores, provisions and other matters aforesaid which Owner is to provide and pay for and Owner shall refund to Charterer any sums Charterer or its agents may have paid or been compelled to pay in respect of any such liability on presentation of reasonable supporting documentation. Any amounts allowable in general average for wages and provisions and stores shall be credited to Charterer insofar as such amounts are in respect of a period when the Vessel is on-hire.

 

(b)The Owner shall arrange for procurement of an additional stock of spare parts for FSRU operations (the “FSRU Operational Spares”) for Charterer’s account, either as part of the operating expenses for the Vessel and subject to the provisions of Schedule III, or as part of the cost to be covered by Charterer in relation to the Project. The Parties shall develop and agree the list of FSRU Operational Spares to be procured, also taking into consideration spare parts that will or may become available from the sister vessel Neptune. The Charterer shall cover all costs associated with the FSRU Operational Spares and in case the Parties do not agree on the list of FSRU Operational Spares it is the Charterer who shall ultimately decide whether or not to include a specific spare part as part of FSRU Operational Spares.”

 

(f)Clause 12 (“Payment of Hire”) of the Charter shall be amended by the addition of the following new sub-clause (d):

 

“(d)Without in any way prejudicing Charterer’s obligation to pay hire in accordance with the Clauses 11 and 12 of this Charter, Owner shall raise an invoice on the Charterer’s project office in India (set up for the execution of the Project), with a copy to the Charterer’s head office, covering each payment of hire under this Charter. For these purposes, the address of the Charterer’s project office shall be advised by Charterer to Owner in writing prior to commencement of the Project Period.

 

Each invoice shall be sent by e-mail at least ***** (*****) days before the payment of hire is due, and an original copy shall be sent by post both to the Charterer’s project office and to its head office.”

  

 Page 17 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(g)Clause 23 (“Loss of Vessel”) of the Charter shall be amended by deleting the words “GMT” and replacing them with “the time in India”.

 

 

(h)Clause 24 (“Off-hire”) of the Charter shall be amended to read: “Not Used”. Any use of the term “off-hire” elsewhere in the Charter and any references in the Charter to Clause 24 thereof shall be deemed deleted in their entirety when the Vessel is being used in FSRU Mode.

 

(i)Modification to Clause 25 (“Dry-docking; Time for Scheduled Maintenance”) of the Charter:

 

i.Subject to (i) continued approval by the Classification Society, the Vessel’s Flag State and all applicable governmental and regulatory authorities, and (ii) in any case only up until the date on which the Vessel is ***** years old, the wording “*****-month intervals and no more than *****-month intervals” in Clause 25 (a) of the Charter shall be amended to read “*****-month intervals and no more than *****-month intervals”.

 

In addition, the following sentence shall be added to the end of Clause 25(a) of the Charter:

 

“For the avoidance of doubt, if the Owner is obliged to schedule a dry-dock (with out of water survey) of the Vessel at a yard during the Project Period due to the rules, regulations and requirements of the Classification Society, the Vessel’s Flag State and/or any applicable governmental or regulatory authority, the provisions of Clause 25(g) below shall apply.”

 

ii.Clause 25 (d) of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety:

 

“(i)Owner shall be permitted up to ***** (*****) days per every *****(*****) days, commencing from the first day of the ***** (the “Maintenance Allowance”) to take the FSRU out of service for maintenance, repair, and overhaul, for the performance of surveys, and for drydocking, including all related pre-docking and post-docking procedures and time spent proceeding to or from any port or place of dry-dock and the FSRU Terminal (or such other location as may be mutually agreed by the Parties) (collectively, the “Permitted Maintenance Events”), during which there shall be no reduction in Hire solely for the FSRU’s failure to meet the Performance Guarantees or to deliver any part of the Nominated Daily Rate. Scheduled maintenance shall be identified in an annual maintenance plan to be provided by Owner to Charterer on a reasonable endeavours basis, based on

 

 Page 18 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Charterer’s operational requirements. The annual maintenance plan will be provided by Owner to Charterer within ***** (*****) weeks after the date of the Amendment No. 5 and prior to the ***** day of the *****, and from then on annually no later than ***** (*****) months prior to each year end.

 

(ii)Furthermore the Maintenance Allowance in the last year of any Renewal Period shall be increased by the number of additional days as may be required to undertake special surveys and/or maintenance work connected with the Vessel’s Classification Society requirements for class renewal (including without limitation cargo tank inspections and bottom survey afloat, under the so called extended drydock scheme) or otherwise as required by statutory authorities (the “Renewal Work”), up to a maximum of ***** (*****) days, provided that the Owner shall use reasonable endeavours to:

 

(a)carry out such Renewal Work during any period of annual maintenance referred to in Clause 25(d)(i) above; and

 

(b)plan and carry out such Renewal Work in cooperation the Charterer so as to minimize the disruption to Charterer’s commercial operations.

 

For the avoidance of doubt any Renewal Work shall be considered as a Permitted Maintenance Event for the purposes of this Clause 25(d), and the time allowed for the carrying out of such Renewal Work shall include any periods where the Owner is gas freeing, inspecting the tanks, and cooling/gassing up the Vessel. Any costs incurred in respect of such activities shall be for Charterer’s account.

 

The additional Renewal Work allowance specified here-above is based on the agreed assumption of a conventional way of preparing and surveying the cargo tanks. To the extent any particular regulatory requirements or restrictions apply, which extend the time required for gas freeing, inspecting the tanks and/or cooling/gassing up the Vessel, the Parties shall agree to an equitable increase to the additional allowance specified here-above.

 

(iii)The Maintenance Allowance shall not be reduced in whole or in part if an event described in Clause 27(b)(v) (a) to (m) (but not including Clause 27(b)(v)(g)) occurs during the performance of a Permitted Maintenance Event.

 

 Page 19 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(iv)The Maintenance Allowance shall be prorated on a straight line basis during the first and last years of the Sub-Charter Period to the extent that the date of Delivery and the date of Redelivery do not start or end at the end of a calendar year. To the extent that any Maintenance Allowance remains unutilized by Owner by the end of a year, such remaining Maintenance Allowance shall be forfeited and shall not be carried over into the next year.

 

(v)Owner shall not use more time for maintenance than is necessary and shall notify Charterer if any Maintenance Allowance is taken or will be taken. Owner shall consult with Charterer as far in advance as possible with regard to the timing, the duration and the requirement for any maintenance work.

 

(vi)The FSRU shall be On-Hire during any period of the Maintenance Allowance, and all items to be provided and paid for by Charterer pursuant to Clause 9(a) shall be for Charterer’s account, and Owner’s use of the Maintenance Allowance shall not in any way or to any extent whatsoever be regarded as a default, non-performance or breach by Owner of any obligation under or any provision of the Charter.

 

(vii)The Parties acknowledge that during a Permitted Maintenance Event the FSRU may not be available, in whole or in part, to provide Regasification or other services. If due to the nature of the Permitted Maintenance Event, the FSRU can continue to provide FSRU services, Owner shall inform Charterer and, upon Charterer’s request, shall provide such FSRU services, on a non-guaranteed basis.

 

(viii)Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Clause 25, no scheduled dry-docking (with bottom survey in drydock) shall take place in the Project Period, provided that the Sub-Charter Period does not extend beyond the date falling ***** (*****) days prior to the Vessels next scheduled dry-dock (with bottom survey in drydock) in accordance with the Vessel’s Classification Society requirements.

 

(ix)For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Clause 25(d) shall prevent Owner from carrying out general maintenance on the Vessel which does not result in any deficiency in the Vessel’s service.”

 

iii.Clause 25 (e) shall be amended to read: “Not Used”.

  

 Page 20 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5


SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(j)Clause 26 (Ship Inspection) shall be amended by the addition of the words “ and Project Sub-Charterer, as applicable” after the word “Charterer” wherever it occurs.

 

(k)Clause 27 (“Performance”) of the Charter shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“(a)

  

(i)Owner undertakes and guarantees that at all times during the Project Period the Vessel shall be capable of maintaining a maximum average daily boil-off of no more than *****% of the Vessel’s total cargo capacity. For purposes of establishing whether the Vessel has achieved performance as required under this Clause 27(a), the Parties shall discount periods when: (i) the Vessel is discharging regasified LNG and/or loading or discharging LNG; (ii) when due to loading of LNG the saturated vapour pressure is above 170 mbarg; and (iii) if pre-approved or requested by Charterer, the Vessel is transferring cargo between cargo tanks.

 

(ii)Boil-off calculation: Boil-off shall be measured by subtracting the volume of LNG contained in the Vessel’s tanks at gauging at the end of an FSRU Gas Day of no discharging regasified LNG and/or loading or discharging LNG and/or by Charterer approved transfer of LNG between cargo tanks, but where the Vessel is still connected within Jaigarh Port, from the volume of LNG contained in the Vessel’s tanks at gauging at the start of an FSRU Gas Day of no discharging regasified LNG and/or loading or discharging LNG, and/or by Charterer approved transfer of LNG between cargo tanks. but where the Vessel is still connected within Jaigarh Port. Actual boil-off shall be calculated using the mean value from ***** (*****) distinct but consecutive measurements and averaged over a performance period of one month.

 

(b)

 

(i)Owner further undertakes, subject to the provisions of this Clause 27(b) and subject to a start-up period to be mutually agreed (“Start Up Period”), that the Regasification Components will, throughout the Term, enable the Vessel’s cargo to be regasified and discharged at not less than

 

 Page 21 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

a regasified LNG discharge rate of ***** (*****) MMScf/day (“Normal Performance”). The Parties will use reasonable endeavours to develop and agree a commissioning procedure in respect of the Start Up Period no later than ***** (*****) days prior to Vessel’s arrival at the FSRU Terminal, including final testing and commissioning of the Modification Work. Furthermore, if during the Start Up Period, the Owner is prevented from adhering to the commissioning procedure for reasons not directly attributable either to the acts or omissions of the Owner or to the Vessel, the Start Up Period shall be automatically extended for the period of time that the Owner is prevented from adhering to the commissioning procedure. In every case where the Actual Discharge Rate is higher than the then-current Normal Performance during regasification of LNG and has been in operation for ***** (*****) periods of at least ***** (*****) hours without any unplanned shut down so that total operating time accumulates to ***** (*****) hours , the value of such Actual Discharge Rate shall immediately replace the then-current Normal Performance until subsequently re-adjusted up to a maximum Normal Performance of ***** (*****) MMScf/day. Each such increase in the Normal Performance shall be formalized by signature by both Parties of the Discharge Performance Certificate attached as Appendix 2 to Amendment No. 5.

 

(ii)Subject always to the provisions of Clause 27(b)(iii) below, Owner shall, subject to applicable terms of the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures, deliver the Nominated Discharge Rate in accordance with the daily curve agreed with Charterer in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures (“Send Out Profile”), subject to such Send-Out Profile for that FSRU Gas Day being agreed no later than ***** (*****) hours before the commencement of the relevant FSRU Gas Day. In case the Owner fail to deliver gas in accordance with the Send Out Profile as required pursuant to the applicable terms of the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures, then the applicable terms of the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures will apply to such failure (provided always that such terms are fair, reasonable and proportionate to the failure). Owner shall use reasonable endeavors to accommodate any change to the Send Out Profile requested by Charterer, less than ***** (*****) hours before the end of the relevant FSRU Gas Day (“Intraday Nomination”), but Owner shall not be liable for any failure in this respect.

 

(iii)Whenever Charterer requests a Nominated Discharge Rate above Normal Performance, Owner shall use reasonable endeavors to make

 

 Page 22 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

such higher rate available, subject always to the maximum capacity of the Regasification Components when all three units of the Regasification Components are operating. Notwithstanding the provisions of the immediately following paragraph, if the Vessel is incapable of discharging its cargo at such higher rate, such performance shall not be considered Reduced Performance and Charterer shall not be entitled to pay hire at a rate equal to the Reduced Rate or claim a reduction in hire.

 

If, on any day, commencing from 08.00 A.M. (India local time) on that day and ending at 07.59 A.M. (India local time) on the immediately following day (an “FSRU Gas Day”), the Vessel’s actual discharge rate calculated over that FSRU Gas Day as measured in accordance with

 

Clause 27(b)(iv)-(v) (the “Actual Discharge Rate”), is less than the daily nominated discharge rate requested by Charterer in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures for that FSRU Gas Day (the “Nominated Discharge Rate”), and such Actual Discharge Rate is lower than Normal Performance (such deficient performance hereinafter being referred to as “Reduced Performance”), then a Hire Rate equal to a reduced rate determined by multiplying the Fixed Element of the Hire Rate by a factor calculated by dividing the Actual Discharge Rate by the lower of (i) the Nominated Discharge Rate or (ii) the Normal Performance (the “Reduced Rate”) shall be payable for each of such FSRU Gas Day in respect of which an Actual Discharge Rate lower than the Nominated Discharge Rate and the Normal Performance has been determined during the FSRU Discharge Period in question. This Reduced Rate in case of Reduced Performance shall replace in its entirety Paragraph 4 of Schedule III. For the avoidance of doubt, any reduction of hire to which Charterer is entitled under this Clause 27(b)(iii) shall be credited against hire payments in accordance with Clause 12(a) as promptly as possible.

 

(iv)If no discharge of regasified LNG is ongoing from the Vessel, measurement of the Actual Discharge Rate shall commence when the vaporizers, piping and pressurizing risers are cooled down and the last high pressure pump required to achieve the ordered discharge rate is placed on line and the Vessel starts the discharge of Regasified LNG, and shall terminate when the first high pressure pump is secured near the end of the discharge (“FSRU Discharge Period”).

 

Prior to the commencement of an FSRU Discharge Period a notification of FSRU Readiness to Discharge Gas (as defined in the FSRU Gas

 

 Page 23 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Nomination Procedures) shall be delivered by Charterer to Owner in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures and an FSRU Discharge Period shall start no later than ***** (*****) hours after Owner’s receipt of the above notification, unless such time is extended by reasons attributable to Charterer, Project Sub-Charterer, the FSRU Terminal, governmental or regulatory authorities or Force Majeure (as defined in the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures).

 

The Actual Discharge Rate shall be the rate of regasified LNG discharged as measured by the Vessel’s metering station. When measuring the Actual Discharge Rate against Normal Performance a variation of ***** percent (*****%) shall be allowed.

 

Normal Performance shall be based upon LNG with a chemical composition (Mass%) (Typical Trinidad LNG composition) as follows:

  

Methane *****%

 

Ethane *****%

 

Propane *****%

 

i-Buthane *****%

 

n-Buthane *****%

 

Nitrogen *****%

 

(v)The performance of the Vessel in relation to the warranty contained in this Clause 27(b) shall be reviewed on the 25th of each calendar month, and the results accumulated and compensation, if any, shall be assessed and paid at the next hire payment due at the beginning of the following calendar month. For purposes of establishing whether the Vessel has achieved performance as required under Clause 27(b) and calculating the Hire Rate, the Parties shall discount any FSRU Gas Day (or in case of (g) and (j) below, only the relevant part of the FSRU Gas Day, provided that the volumes required in such part of the FSRU Gas Day in accordance with the Send Out Profile shall be disregarded and the Nominated Discharge Rate for that FSRU Gas Day shall be adjusted accordingly):

 

(a)where the FSRU Terminal is not ready or able to receive the Nominated Discharge Rate specified by Charterer in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures and at the corresponding pressures and temperatures;

 

 Page 24 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(b)where Charterer has requested Intraday Nominations as per Clause 27(b)(ii);

 

(c)where Charterer has instructed the Vessel to proceed from the FSRU Terminal;

 

(d)where the Vessel is prevented from approaching or remaining and/or operating at the FSRU Terminal or the Owner is prohibited from operating in accordance with this Charter by any applicable law, relevant regulatory or governmental authority for a reason not attributable to a breach by Owner of this Charter or a failure on the part of the Vessel;

 

(e)where the Vessel is required to disconnect and/or to depart from the FSRU Terminal or is prevented from discharging her cargo as regasified LNG by reason of compliance with the applicable requirements and guidelines of the Classification Society, the Vessel’s Flag State or any other relevant regulatory authority and/or with such requirements as set out in the FSRU operating manual in relation to the Vessel’s safe operation, cargo management and/or filling level restrictions;

 

(f)where there is not a required amount of LNG onboard the Vessel to obtain the Nominated Discharge Rate in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures;

 

(g)where the Owner is using the Maintenance Allowance;

 

(h)where the Downstream Systems are not ready or able to provide or receive the Nominated Discharge Rate specified by Charterer in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures and at the corresponding pressures and temperatures;

 

(i)where the Vessel is prevented from discharging by other events within the port or where there is a wider risk to safety or the environment;

 

(j)where the Vessel is required to stop regas operations in order to switch the selected ship-shore link between the Vessel and the LNG carrier calling at the FSRU Terminal, or between the Vessel and the jetty;

 

(k)where the Vessel’s failure to achieve the required performance under Clause 27(b) of this Charter results from any negligent act or omission of a member of the Charterer’s Group and/or an owner or operator of an LNG Carrier; and

 

(l)where the Vessel’s failure to achieve the required performance under Clause 27(b) of this Charter arises from any Adverse Weather Conditions; and

 

(m)where the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures have not been agreed and attached as a new Schedule X.

 

 Page 25 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(vi)In the event that the Parties have been unable to agree the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures (and such procedures are not set forth in a new Schedule X), then notwithstanding any other provisions of this Clause 27(b) to the contrary, Owner shall use reasonable endeavours to comply with any daily nominated discharge rate that may be requested by Charterer, but otherwise Owner shall not be liable for any failure to deliver gas in accordance with this Clause 27.

 

(vii)Notwithstanding the provisions of this Clause 27(b), if at any stage the Actual Discharge Rate achieved by the Vessel is less than Normal Performance due to a defect in the Regasification Components (and such lower discharge rate has not been requested by Charterer in accordance with the FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures), Owner shall be entitled to repair such defect in the Regasification Components and/or the Vessel by the Vessel proceeding to dry-docking in accordance with the provisions of Clause 25(h). Before committing to a dry dock, Owner shall always consult with the Charterer to assess alternative solutions.

 

(viii)The Vessel shall be capable of regasifying LNG in a closed-loop heating mode using steam from the Vessel’s regas boilers as the primary heating medium at a daily Nominated Discharge Rate with a pressure of 50 to 114 bar and a temperature of +10 to 20◦C at the outlet of the Regas skid.”

 

(l)Clause 30(a) of the Charter shall be amended by the addition of the following two new paragraphs:

 

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in respect of the Project neither Owner nor any other member of Owner Covered Group shall be liable for any event or occurrence, or condition resulting therefrom, (i) that delays, hinders or renders impossible the Owner’s performance of its obligations under this Charter, (ii) that is beyond the reasonable control of the Owner; (iii) that was not reasonably foreseeable, or if foreseeable could not have been prevented or avoided by the Owner through the exercise of due diligence and (iv) for which neither the Owner nor any other member of the Owner Covered Group would otherwise have been liable, but for Charterer’s entry into the Project Agreement, Owner’s entry into Amendment No. 5, or either Party’s entry into any other document pursuant to or in connection with the Project, the Project Agreement or Amendment No.5.

 

Without limitation to the generality of the foregoing, in respect of the Project each of the following shall constitute an event or occurrence for which neither the Owner nor any other member of Owner Covered Group shall be liable: (i) change of laws or regulations or any act of government or governmental authority having or asserting jurisdiction over the Vessel operating as an FSRU in India (other than those changes in law or regulations or any act of government or governmental authority which, in each case, merely implement international shipping conventions or regulations applicable to the Vessel); or (ii) actions of a governmental authority that were not requested, promoted, caused by or imposed as a result of the actions of Owner or any other member Owner Covered Group or the Vessel or the failure of the Owner or any other member of Owner Covered Group or the Vessel to act.”

 

 Page 26 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(m)Clause 52(c)(iv) and (v) of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: “Not Used”.

 

(n)The second sentence of Clause 53 of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety:

 

The foregoing notwithstanding, no term of this Charter, other than Clauses 68(a) and (b) (as amended by Amendment No. 5), and Clause 68(c) is enforceable under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 by a person or entity who is not a party to it, except that the Mortgagee shall have the benefit of and may enforce the provisions of Clause 14 of Amendment No. 5.”

  

(o)Clause 68(a) of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety:

 

“No member of Owner’s Group shall be under any liability whatsoever to (i) Charterer’s Representatives; (ii) Charterer; or (iii) Project Sub-Charterer, or (iv) their estates or (v) in respect of (ii) and (iii) their respective agents or employees (“Charterer’s Group”) for their death or personal injury during the time when they are engaged in the activities contemplated under this Charter unless death or personal injury is caused, in whole or in part, by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Owner, its agents or employees (“Owner’s Group”). Likewise, no member of Owner’s Group shall be under any liability to any member of Charterer’s Group in respect of damage to, or loss or destruction of, their personal property unless such damage to, or loss or destruction of, personal property is caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any member of Owner’s Group.”

 

(p)Clause 68(b) of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety:

 

“No member of Charterer’s Group shall be under any liability whatsoever to any member of Owner’s Group for their death or personal injury during the time when they are engaged in the activities contemplated under this Charter unless death or personal injury is caused, in whole or in part, by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of a member of Charterer’s Group. Likewise, no member of Charterer’s Group shall be under any liability to any member of Owner’s Group in respect of damage to, or loss or destruction of, their personal property unless such damage to, or loss or destruction of, personal property is caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any member of Charterer’s Group.

 

 Page 27 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(q)A new Clause 68(d) shall be inserted into the Charter to read as follows:

 

“(i)Charterer shall procure that the Port Operator and the Owner and any other third party that conducts operations at the FSRU Terminal execute mutual hold harmless agreements (including, if applicable, a port liability agreement between the Port Operator and the Owner and/or Manager), in each case providing a similar exclusion of liability between the Port Operator or relevant third party and Owner as that between Charterer’s Group and Owner’s Group pursuant to Clauses 68(a) and (b) above.

 

(ii)In the event that the Port Operator has not entered into a port liability agreement with the Owner (or Manager, as the case may be) prior to the Vessel’s arrival at the FSRU Terminal, the Port Operator (and its estates and respective agents or employees) shall, from the time of the Vessel’s arrival at the FSRU Terminal, be considered a member of the “Charterer’s Group” for the purpose of Clauses 68(a) and (b) above.”

 

(r)Appendix I to Schedule I of the Charter shall be amended to read in its entirety: “Not Used”. Any references in the Charter to Appendix I to Schedule I thereof, and any uses of the term “Primary Terminal” in the Charter shall be deemed deleted in their entirety.

 

(s)Schedule X of the Charter (Gas Nomination Procedures) shall be deleted in its entirety and shall be replaced with a new Schedule X once agreed (FSRU Gas Nomination Procedures).

 

5.2All terms and conditions of the Charter, except to the extent modified or changed by this Amendment No. 5 shall remain in full force and effect. However, such terms and conditions shall be interpreted in light of and in such way to give effect to the intention of the parties set out in Clause 2 above, provided however that, any further amendment or modification to the Charter that may be required during the Project Period shall always be agreed in writing between the Parties.

 

5.3For the avoidance of doubt and with reference to paragraph 1.2(c)(ii) to Schedule III of the Charter, Owner shall not in any circumstances whatsoever be forced or obliged to lay off any of the Vessel’s master, officers or crew. However, Owner shall use reasonable endeavours to mitigate the Variable Element cost (i.e. manning and crew travel expenses).

 

5.4For the avoidance of doubt and without prejudice to Clauses 1 to 4, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 6 to 15 and 18 of this Amendment No. 5, for any Voyage the Charter shall apply without the amendments and/or additions set out in Clause 5.1 of this Amendment No. 5.

 

 Page 28 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

5.5For the avoidance of doubt and without prejudice to Clauses 1 to 4, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and 7 to 14 of this Amendment No. 5, upon expiry of the Project Period the Charter shall apply without the amendments and/or additions set out in Clause 5.1, 5.6, 6, 8 to 11, 14 and 18 of this Amendment No. 5, but without prejudice to any rights, obligations or liabilities that may have accrued prior to the expiry of the Project Period.

 

5.6At any time during the Project Period when a Voyage is occurring, each of the Unscheduled Maintenance Allowance specified in Clause 25(d) of the Charter and each of the Off hire Allowance specified in Clause 24(h) of the Charter shall be reduced to an allowance equal to the original Unscheduled Maintenance and Off-hire Allowances, multiplied by the number of days in the then-current year of the Project Period during which a Voyage has occurred, divided by ***** (*****) days.

 

 Page 29 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

6.Voyage

 

6.1At any time and from time to time during the Project Period, the Charterer is entitled to use the Vessel in LNG carrier mode (“LNG Carrier Mode”) and order the Vessel on a Voyage, provided that Charterer has given Owner not less than ***** (*****) days prior notice.

 

6.2If Owner is requested by Charterer to prepare the Vessel for a Voyage including but not limited to removal of any fouling, then to the extent not covered by paragraph 1.2 of Schedule III, Charterer shall reimburse Owner for the documented related costs within ten ***** (*****) of receipt of Owner’s invoice.

 

6.3Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Charter, during a Voyage Owner shall not be deemed to be in breach of any provisions of the Charter to the extent such breach is caused by or otherwise directly attributable to the use of the Vessel in FSRU Mode or directly attributable to the Modification Work (including the Long Lead Items) or any Charterer’s Item.

 

6.4Unless Owner has been allowed to perform Voyage preparations in order for the Vessel to meet its original performance guarantees of the Charter, Clauses 27(a)(i)-(ii), the part of Clauses 27(c)(i) pertaining to speed and the part of Clause 27(c)(ii) pertaining to fuel oil consumption (not related to excess boil off) shall not apply to any Voyage.

 

6.5Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is acknowledged that unless and until the Vessel has been installed with a BWTS in accordance with Clauses 7.2 or 9.6 of this Amendment No. 5, the Vessel is not in compliance with the BWM Convention. Consequently, the Charterer will not be entitled to either (a) order the Vessel to load or discharge at terminals located in the United States of America or (b) at any time after 20th August 2023 use the Vessel in LNG Carrier Mode, in each case unless the BWTS has been installed on the Vessel.

 

7.Reinstatement Work to the Vessel

 

7.1At the expiry of the Project Period the Vessel may at Charterer’s option proceed to the Reinstatement Yard where Owner shall arrange for the Reinstatement Work being carried out for Charterer’s time, risk and expense. However, unless Owner has been instructed by Charterer to arrange for such Reinstatement Work to be carried out, Owner shall not be deemed in breach of any provisions of the Charter (including any failure of the Vessel to comply with any applicable regulation and/or requirement of any Primary Terminal) to the extent such breach is caused by or otherwise

 

 Page 30 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

attributable to any Modification Work having been carried out or to the Reinstatement Work, or any part thereof, having not been carried out.

 

7.2Notwithstanding Clause 7.1 above, the Charterer shall be obliged to order the Vessel to a yard at the expiry of the Project Period where Owner shall arrange for the Vessel to be dry-docked for the purposes of its third special survey (class renewal survey) and, unless (i) the BWTS has been installed pursuant to Clause 9.6 of this Amendment No. 5 or (ii) where for Charterer’s proposed use of the Vessel after the end of the Project Period installation of BWTS is not required under the rules and regulations of the Classification Society, the Flag State and/or any applicable governmental or regulatory authority, the installation of the BWTS. The provisions of Clause 25(g) of the Charter shall apply to such drydock and any work relating to the installation of the BWTS shall be deemed to be an LNG Carrier Change for the purpose of Clause 42 of the Charter.

 

7.3Owner and Charterer shall at a time to be mutually agreed (and in any event no later than the expiry of the Project Period) arrange to discuss Charterer’s proposed use of the Vessel following the expiry of the Project Period. Following such discussions and based upon them, Owner shall provide to Charterer a proposed Reinstatement Specification, which scope, time and related costs shall be mutually agreed to by the Parties (it being understood that such proposal is provisional only and may be updated, without prejudice to Charterer’s obligation to reimburse Owner in accordance with this Clause 7.3). Charterer shall reimburse Owner for the documented cost of the Reinstatement Work and compensate Owner for Owner’s own reasonable and documented costs related to the Reinstatement Work to the extent not covered by paragraph 1.2 of Schedule III, including but not limited to the cost of supervision, administration and follow up of the Reinstatement Work (to the extent not covered by paragraph 1.2 (c) (i) of Schedule III), within ***** (*****) days of receipt of Owner’s invoice. All invoicing and payments shall be in USD unless otherwise agreed between the Parties.

 

7.4Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Charter, the Vessel shall be on hire, and the performance warranties set out in Clause 27 of the Charter shall not apply, for the duration of the Reinstatement Work, the time of which shall include related pre-docking and post-docking procedures, if applicable, and the time spent proceeding to and from the Reinstatement Yard, and such time shall not for the avoidance of doubt count against the Drydocking Allowances or the Unscheduled Maintenance Allowances set forth in the original Clause 25(d) of the Charter, or the Maintenance Allowance set forth in Clause 25(d) as amended by this Amendment No. 5, unless to the extent otherwise agreed in writing between the Parties (which may be the case in an event of concurrent performance of the Reinstatement Work and Drydocking).

 

 Page 31 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

7.5Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Clause 7, Owner shall have no responsibility or liability to Charterer in the event that the Vessel fails to comply with any applicable regulation and/or requirement of any Primary Terminal, arising from any Modification Work (including the Long Lead Items) or any Charterer’s Items incorporated on the Vessel or other equipment affixed to the Vessel which was requested by Charterer to the extent that it is not removed as part of the Reinstatement Work, and the Vessel shall not be off-hire in respect of any loss of time (whether by way of an interruption in the Vessel’s service or from a reduction in the Vessel’s performance, or in any other manner) resulting therefrom.

 

7.6Notwithstanding the foregoing, Charterer shall direct Owner to arrange for the Reinstatement Work to be carried out no later than at the end of the Term of the Charter, and otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 7.1 and 7.3 of this Amendment No. 5 but in such circumstances the Reinstatement Specification relating to such Reinstatement Work shall be determined by Owner in its sole discretion.

 

7.7Charterer acknowledges that Owner may have arranged for certain modification work to be carried out in accordance with the provisions of previous Amendment Agreements to the Charter. Consequently, it is agreed that in addition to the Reinstatement Work to be arranged pursuant to Clauses 7.1 and 7.3 of this Amendment No. 5, any reinstatement work that may have been carried out by Charterer or Owner under the terms of a previous Amendment Agreement at the expiry of the applicable “Sub-Charter Period” (as such term is defined in the relevant Amendment Agreement), shall now be at carried out by Charterer (or by Owner on Charterer’s instructions) no later than at the end of the Term of the Charter, and otherwise in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 7.1, 7.3 and 7.6 of this Amendment No. 5, including to the extent that the specifications relating to such Reinstatement Work shall be determined by Owner in its sole discretion.

 

7.8At the expiry of the Charter, Charterer shall also have the right to remove any of the Charterer’s Items (or any other equipment incorporated onto the Vessel requested by Charterer for which title remains vested in Charterer), provided that Charterer shall repair and restore any part of the Vessel directly related thereto. All costs relating to such removal, repair and restoration work shall be for Charterer’s account, and the Vessel shall be on-hire, and the performance warranties set out in Clause 27 of the Charter shall not apply, for the time taken to perform such work, including for any time spent at, and time spent in transit to and from the relevant shipyard, and such time shall not count against the Drydocking Allowances or the Unscheduled Maintenance Allowances set forth in the original Clause 25(d) of the Charter.

 

7.9If Charterer elects not to remove any of the Charterer’s Items (or any other equipment incorporated onto the Vessel requested by Charterer for which title remains vested in Charterer), in accordance with Clause 7.8 above, ownership of and title in such items

 

 Page 32 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

shall transfer from Charterer to Owner, free of charge, on the expiry of the Charter Period unless the Parties mutually agree otherwise.

 

7.10Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Clause 7, Owner and Charterer may mutually agree that Owner will purchase certain Charterer’s Items from Charterer at the time of expiry of the Charter, in which case the Parties will agree the terms for such purchase and, unless otherwise agreed, the ownership of and title in such items shall transfer from Charterer upon payment of a sum agreed between Owner and Charterer. For the avoidance of doubt; the Owner has no obligation to purchase any Charterer’s Items from Charterer.

 

7.11If as a result of the Reinstatement Work carried out by Owner under this Clause 7, the details contained within Appendix 1 of this Amendment No. 5 should change, Appendix 1 shall be replaced with an updated Gas Form C.

 

8.Indemnities

 

8.1

 

(a)Charterer shall within ***** (*****) Business Days of demand by the Owner indemnify and hold Owner and any member of the Owner Covered Group harmless from any charges, costs, expenses, claims, liabilities and losses whatsoever (each a “Claim”) (except for any Claim relating to the tax implications addressed in Clause 8.2 below) which Owner and any member of the Owner Covered Group determines it has incurred or may incur as a consequence of the Charterer’s entry into the Project Agreement, Owner’s entry into this Amendment No. 5, or the Parties entering into any other document pursuant to or in connection with the Project, the Project Agreement or this Amendment No. 5, including as a consequence of:

 

(i)the Modification Work and the Reinstatement Work,

 

(ii)any delay or failure on the part of Charterer to obtain any of the Approvals that are required to be obtained by Charterer pursuant to the provisions of Clause 4 above, and

 

(iii)any of the circumstances referred to in Clause 9.3 of this Amendment No. 5, and

 

(iv)any member of the Owner Covered Group entering into or acknowledging the Operations Manual,

 

and that, for the avoidance of doubt, exceed any Claim that Owner or any other member of Owner Covered Group would have otherwise been liable for under the Charter, except to the extent that such Claim resulted from Owner’s material failure to comply with a term or condition of the Charter, this Amendment No. 5 or any other addenda or amendments to the Charter, where such material failure is found to result directly in the harm underlying the Claim in respect of which Owner is invoking the foregoing indemnity.

 

 Page 33 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(b)It is confirmed, clarified and agreed as follows:

 

(i)that sub-clause 8.1(a) above shall not apply to any liability specifically addressed by Clause 68 of the Charter as amended ("Specified Liabilities"), which shall subsist and be construed in accordance with their terms regardless of where any Specified Liabilities may be suffered or incurred (including during any use or operation of the Vessel as an FSRU in India or in LNG Carrier Mode) and regardless of the nationality of the Party or Parties to whom any Specified Liabilities are incurred (and Specified Liabilities are hereby confirmed to be liabilities which do not fall within the scope of sub-clause 8.1(a) above);

 

(ii)that Owner's liability for any tortious act (which includes negligence) by Owner or any member of the Owner Covered Group to any third party shall be treated in the same manner as such tortious act would be treated under the Charter, and the fact that any such tortious act may be committed during operation of the Vessel as an FSRU in India or in LNG Carrier Mode shall not change the allocation of liability which would otherwise apply as a consequence of such tort occurring under the Charter; nor shall the geographical location of any tortious act or the nationality of the party or parties injured by such tortious act(s) affect in any way the allocation of liability therefor. The fact that a tortious act to any third party is committed by Owner or any other member of the Owner Covered Group while operations are conducted under the Project Agreement does not affect in any way the culpability and liability of Owner or any member of the Owner Covered Group for such tortious act(s) (and liability for such acts shall be treated as if they had occurred under the Charter); and any resulting loss suffered by Owner or any member of Owner Covered Group shall not be covered by the indemnity in sub-clause 8.1(a) above save and except that any indemnities or limitations or exclusions of liability available to Owner under the Charter (excluding sub-clause 8.1(a) above) shall apply and shall be available to Owner in respect of any liability arising from use of the Vessel as an FSRU in India or in LNG Carrier Mode;

 

(iii)that the indemnities in sub-clause 8.1(a) above and in Clause 8.2 below shall extend to and for the benefit of each member of Owner Covered Group and that each member of Owner Covered Group shall have the benefit of and may enforce those provisions notwithstanding Clause 15 of this Amendment No.5., provided that no such indemnities shall apply to any liability resulting from Owner’s material failure to comply with a term or condition of the Charter, this Amendment No. 5 or any other addenda or amendments to the Charter, where such material failure is found to result directly in the liability in respect of which Owner is invoking the foregoing indemnity.

 

 Page 34 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

8.2

 

(a)Irrespective of whether or not the Owner or any applicable member of the Owner Covered Group is in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations applicable to the Vessel’s operation in India in FSRU Mode, Charterer shall always be liable for and shall within ***** (*****) Business Days of demand by the Owner indemnify and hold harmless Owner and each other member of Owner Covered Group against all losses, liabilities and costs which the Owner determines will be or has been suffered by Owner or a member of the Owner Covered Group for or on account of Indian Taxes. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Charter (including this Amendment No. 5), the Charterer shall not indemnify or hold harmless Owner or any member of the Owner Covered Group against, and shall not be liable for, any loss, liability or costs which have been or will be suffered by Owner or any member of the Owner Covered Group for or on account of Indian Taxes which have been or will be incurred as a result (i) any activity of the Owner or the Owner Covered Group that does not relate to the performance of its obligations under this Amendment No 5; or (ii) the Owner or the Owner Covered Group being incorporated in or a tax resident of India or having a permanent or fixed establishment in India for any purpose other than in directly relation to this Amendment No. 5

 

(b)Any tax credit that Owner obtains in relation to such Indian Taxes shall be deducted from Charterer’s future indemnification amounts when Owner determines that the creditable amount has been confirmed and received by Owner. If Charterer is entitled to a deduction in future indemnification amounts according to the above, but the Owner determines that such deduction cannot be made, Owner shall reimburse Charterer accordingly. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of Clause 52 ("Taxes") shall apply to taxes other than Indian Taxes.

 

(c)Charterer’s indemnity in Clause 8.2(a) above shall extend to Owner's and any applicable member of Owner Covered Group’s costs of tax and accounting compliance including, without limitation: (i) the costs of agents, tax advisers and internal and external tax controllers and (ii) costs of registering a permanent establishment or branch in India with the Indian tax authorities and deregistering such permanent establishment or branch at the end of the period of use of the vessel in FSRU mode in India. Charterer shall indemnify Owner and any applicable member of Owner Covered Group irrespective of whether Charterer is indemnified by Project Sub-Charterer under the Project Agreement.

 

(d)All payments by Charterer to Owner under the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5) shall be paid without any deduction or withholding for Indian Taxes. In the event that Charterer is required by law to make any such deduction or withholding of Taxes, the amount payable by Charterer to Owner shall be increased by an amount so that the amount after such a deduction or withholding shall be the amount that would have been received by Owner but for such deduction of withholding, and the Charterer shall be also liable for payment of an equivalent amount so deducted or withheld to the applicable governmental authority.

 

 Page 35 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

(e)This Clause 8.2 applies irrespective of whether any tax obligations under the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5) arise from a tax assessment or reassessment by a governmental authority, or other competent tax authority, during the Term or after the termination or expiration of the Charter.

 

(f)A reference in this Clause 8 to "determines" means a determination made in the absolute discretion of the person making the determination.

 

(g)Where the Owner becomes aware of a matter which may give rise to a claim under this Clause 8.2 (an "Indian Tax Claim"), the Owner shall notify the Charterer in writing providing reasonable detail of the nature of the liability and the reasons for that liability arising.

 

(h)Subject to being indemnified and secured on a continuing basis to the Owner's reasonable satisfaction against any costs and expenses which may be incurred by or on behalf of the Owner or a member of the Owner Covered Group, the Owner shall take (or shall procure that a member of the Owner Covered Group shall take) such action as the Charterer may by written notice given to the Owner reasonably request to dispute, resist, appeal against, mitigate or defend the Indian Tax Claim (the "Action").

 

(i)If it becomes clear that the Indian Tax Claim cannot be satisfactorily resolved with the relevant tax or governmental authority, and if the Charterer so requests, and provides an opinion from the Project Tax Consultant (as defined in the Project Agreement) that, on the balance of probabilities, the Owner would be likely to succeed in appealing against the tax or governmental authorities' arguments, the Owner (subject to it continuing to be satisfied by the level of indemnity or security provided by the Charterer) may appeal any decision of the relevant tax or governmental authority before the relevant court of first instance (or shall procure that such an appeal is taken).

 

(j)Any further appeal to a higher court (whether to defend or appeal the first instance decision or any decision of a higher court or tribunal) shall be at the absolute discretion of the Owner.

 

(k)The Charterer may, to the extent permitted by relevant law, elect to have conduct of any Action, in which event:

 

(i)the Owner shall, or shall procure that a member of the Owner Covered Group shall, delegate the conduct of such Action to the Charterer (and/or their professional advisers) and give such authority to them as is required to allow them to conduct the Action and shall notify any relevant third party (including, without limitation, any Taxation Authority) of such authority; and

 

 Page 36 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(ii)the provisions of paragraph (l) below shall apply.

 

(l)The Charterer hereby undertakes to the Owner to:

 

(i)keep the Owner promptly on demand informed of all matters relating to the Action and deliver to the Owner copies of all material correspondence relating to the Action;

 

(ii)deliver to the Owner in draft form all material written communications in respect of the Action which the Charterer or its advisers propose to send to a Taxation Authority and take into account all reasonable comments provided by the Owner within ***** Business Days of such delivery; and

 

(iii)obtain the prior written approval of the Owner to:

 

(1)the settlement or compromise of the Indian Tax Claim which is the subject of the Action; and

 

(2)the agreement of any matter in the conduct of the Action which is likely to affect the amount of the Indian Tax Claim.

 

(m)The Charterer's right to have conduct of the Action pursuant to clause 8.2(k) shall not extend to any decision to appeal any decision of a tax or governmental authority before a court or tribunal.

 

8.3Security for Tax Claims

 

(a)In respect of Indian Taxes and in support of the Charterer’s obligations under Clause 8.2, Charterer agrees to provide, or to procure the provision of, Credit Support pursuant to and in accordance with this Clause 8.3.

 

(b)Not later than ***** (*****) days from the ***** day of the *****, or such later date as the Parties may agree, the Charterer shall deliver, or shall procure the delivery of, Credit Support to the Owner, in the amount of ***** United States Dollars (USD *****).

 

(c)The Owner shall be entitled to draw on the Credit Support in an amount not exceeding an actual demand for payment from Owner issued by the Indian Tax authorities to the Owner (a “Tax Demand”), and deposit or transfer such funds into its bank account, only:

 

(1)to fulfil the payment of Indian Tax obligations of Owner (as such obligations are specified in an applicable Tax Demand) which have arisen directly and solely in connection to the Owner’s activities under this Amendment No. 5; and

 

 Page 37 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(2)if and to the extent that Charterer has failed to make payment in an amount in United States Dollars equal to the Tax Demand within ***** (*****) days of a written request for such payment from the Owner.

 

If (as a result of an Action or otherwise) a Tax Demand for which Charterer has made payment or in respect of which Owner has drawn on Credit Support is later withdrawn or reduced, the Owner shall within ***** (*****) days of a written notice from Charterer reimburse Charterer (or where applicable, the Acceptable Guarantor) for an amount in US Dollars equal to the difference between (i) the amount paid by Charterer and/or drawn by the Owner and (ii) the withdrawn or amended Tax Demand, provided that Owner has not paid such Tax Demand to the Indian Tax authorities or, if payment has been made, Owner has received reimbursement from the Indian Tax authorities.

 

(d)Each Letter of Credit, and any renewal or replacement thereof, shall have a period of validity of at least ***** (*****) days. Not less than ***** (*****) Business Days prior to the scheduled date of its expiry, the Charterer shall cause to be delivered to the Owner (at the Charterer’s option):

 

(1)a replacement or renewal of the Letter of Credit having a period of validity of at least ***** (*****) days, commencing upon the expiration of the preceding Letter of Credit; or

 

(2)a new Guarantee or an amendment to an existing Guarantee for the value of the expiring Letter of Credit, commencing upon the expiration of the expiring Letter of Credit.

 

(e)Charterer shall maintain the Credit Support required under this Clause 8.3 in effect until (i) the date that falls on the *****anniversary of termination or expiry of the Project Agreement or (ii) any such earlier date as the Parties (acting reasonably) may agree (including on the advice of a tax consultant that the making of any Tax Demand against Owner has become time-barred.

 

(f)In the case of a Credit Support Default which is not rectified by the Charterer providing or causing to be provided to the Owner any of (at the Charterer’s election):

 

(1)a replacement Guarantee (and in which case, the Charterer shall withdraw and the Owner shall release the original guarantee or original letter of credit, as applicable, which is the subject of the Credit Support Default); or

 

(2)a replacement Letter of Credit (and in which case, the Charterer shall withdraw and the Owner shall release the original guarantee or original letter of credit, as applicable, which is the subject of the Credit Support Default); or

 

(3)an amended Guarantee or amended Letter of Credit within ***** (*****) days

 

 Page 38 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

of a written notice from Owner informing Charterer of such Credit Support Default, such Credit Support Default shall be deemed a breach of the provisions of this Amendment No. 5, and the Owner shall have the right to treat the Project Period as having come to an end and be entitled to withdraw the Vessel from use by the Charterer as an FSRU under this Amendment No. 5. The Owner’s right to withdraw the Vessel from use by the Charterer in the manner described above shall be without prejudice to Owner’s other rights under this Amendment No. 5 and/or the Charter which shall remain in full force and effect irrespective of the Owner’s withdrawal of the Vessel. If the Charterer later rectifies a Credit Support Default after the time that the Owner has withdrawn the Vessel pursuant to this Clause 8.3(f), the Parties shall discuss in good faith the possibility of redelivering the Vessel for Charterer’s use at the Project for the remainder of the Project Period.

 

(g)If requested by the Owner, the Charterer shall deliver within ***** (*****) days following the end of each fiscal year of the period (if any) that the Charterer’s obligations under this Clause 8.3 are supported by a Guarantee, the audited financial statements of the entity from Charterer’s Group providing such Guarantee for such fiscal year (in the jurisdiction of such relevant entity).

 

(h)For the avoidance of doubt, the Charterer shall not be required to provide or procure the provision to Owner of Credit Support, and shall not incur any liability in respect of any Indian Tax which may become payable by the Owner in respect of (i) any activity of the Owner that does not relate to the performance of its obligations under the Charter as amended by this Amendment No 5; or (ii) the Owner being incorporated in or a tax resident of India or having a permanent or fixed establishment in India for any purpose other than in direct relation to the Charter as amended by this Amendment No. 5.

 

9.Compliance with laws and Approvals when in FSRU Mode

 

9.1Owner shall use reasonable efforts to comply and cause each applicable member of Owner Covered Group to comply with all relevant laws and regulations applicable to the Vessel's operation in India in FSRU Mode, including the provision (either directly to government authorities or to Charterer, as applicable) of any documentation required by applicable laws and regulations and governmental authorities (with a copy to Charterer in the event such documentation is directly sent to government authorities) and, any relevant Approvals.

 

Furthermore, Owner shall comply with its obligations in respect of the obtaining of the Approvals pursuant to the Owner’s Permits Matrix in accordance with Clause 4.

 

 Page 39 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Charterer acknowledges and accepts that despite using reasonable efforts, Owner may be unable to comply with all relevant laws and regulations applicable to the Vessel’s operation in India in FSRU Mode (including with respect to obtaining, maintaining or complying with Approvals or otherwise as to the provision of any relevant documentation) for reasons attributable to the Vessel’s Specifications (as amended in accordance with the terms of the Charter) and its main particulars (as set out in Appendix 1 to this Amendment No. 5), and Owner shall be entitled to rely on the provisions of Clause 30 of the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5) and Clause 8.1 of this Amendment No. 5 in respect of any liability that would otherwise have arisen under this Clause 9.1 in relation to such non-compliance.

 

9.2

 

(a)Notwithstanding the generality of Clause 9.1 above, and without prejudice to Clause 30 of the Charter (as amended by the provisions of this Amendment No. 5), Owner shall comply with all relevant laws and regulation applicable to the employment of shipboard personnel on the Vessel whilst the Vessel is operating in FSRU Mode in India, provided that:

 

(i)neither Owner nor its manager shall have any obligation to employ more than *****per cent (*****%) of Indian nationals on board the Vessel at any given time;

 

(ii)neither Owner nor its manager shall have any obligation to employ Indian nationals in relation to the ranks of master, chief officer, chief engineer and second engineer on board the Vessel;

 

(iii)both Owner and its manager shall have absolute discretion over the employment of all shipboard personnel on board the Vessel; and

 

(iv)in relation to the employment of up to *****per cent (*****%) of Indian nationals on board the Vessel by Owner or its manager, the provisions of Clause 9.2(b) below shall apply.

 

(b)It is agreed and accepted by Charterer that neither Owner nor its manager will be able to comply with any applicable law or regulation obliging it to employ *****percent (*****%) (or more) of Indian nationals on board the Vessel at the start of the Project Period, but that Owner or its manager will use reasonable efforts to employ such percentage of Indian nationals within a period of ***** (*****) months from the start of the Project Period. The Parties agree that provided either Owner or its manager has used reasonable efforts, any failure to employ such percentage of Indian

 

 Page 40 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

nationals within such ***** (*****) month period shall not be considered to be a breach of Owner’s obligations under Clause 9.2 (a).

9.3

 

(a)Subject to the provisions of Clauses 9.1 and 9.2, it is agreed that Charterer’s indemnity under Clause 8.1 shall extend to Owner and Owner Covered Group’s costs of compliance, if any, with the laws and regulations of India both current law and any future changes of law.

 

(b)It is also agreed that neither Owner nor any member of the Owner Covered Group shall have any liability to Charterer for the consequences of:

 

(i)Owner’s failure to comply with the laws and regulations of India or any Approvals in the circumstances referred to within Clauses 9.1 and 9.2(b), provided that Owner has used reasonable efforts to comply with such laws and regulations and Approvals in accordance with the aforementioned clauses; and/or

 

(ii)any delay or failure on the part of Owner to obtain any Approval pursuant to Clause 4 provided that Owner has complied with its obligation to apply for the relevant Approvals, including followed up any such applications as reasonably requested by any governmental authorities in India,

 

and Owner shall be entitled to rely on the provisions of Clause 30(a) of the Charter (as amended by this Amendment No. 5) and Clause 8.1(a) of this Amendment No.5 in respect of any liability that would otherwise have arisen under Clauses 9.1 and 9.2(b) in relation to such non-compliance, and/or under Clause 4 in relation to such delay or failure.

 

Furthermore, the Vessel shall remain on-hire and the performance warranties of Clause 27 of the Charter (as amended by the provisions of this Amendment No. 5) shall not apply for any period during which there is a loss of time (whether by way of interruption in the Vessel’s service or from reduction in Vessel’s performance) resulting from Owner’s non-compliance with the laws and regulations of India and/or any Approvals and/or delay or failure on the part of Owner to obtain any Approval as referred to in sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of this Clause 9.3(b) above, as the case may be.

 

9.4Charterer shall inform Owner of applicable provisions of the laws and regulations of India which are not available from public sources and of proposed or imminent new laws and regulations or amendments to laws and regulations Charterer is aware of and which may be relevant to Owner for purposes of the Project. For the avoidance of doubt, Charterer shall in no event be held liable for not transmitting such information to Owner of which Charterer has no knowledge.

 

 Page 41 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

9.5Charterer shall use reasonable efforts to obtain and remit to Owner information from Project Sub-Charterer regarding any relevant agreements between Project Sub-Charterer and any governmental authorities in India relating to the Project which may be reasonably likely to affect the Vessel, Owner and/or any member of the Owner Covered Group and supply same to Owner for purposes of the Project. For the avoidance of doubt, Charterer shall never be held liable for not transmitting such information that is not known to it or for which is subject to any requirements of confidentiality of Charterer or Project Sub-Charterer.

 

9.6Notwithstanding the foregoing it is acknowledged that during the Period Project the Vessel will not be compliant with the BWM Convention until such time as a BWTS has been installed upon the Vessel. Should the Charterer require the Vessel to conform with the BWM Convention at any point during the Project Period the Owner and Charterer shall consult together regarding the timing of the works required to effect the installation of the BWTS. The works required to install the BWTS shall be deemed to be an LNG Carrier Change for the purposes of Clause 42 of the Charter, and the Vessel shall remain on-hire during such installation.

 

10.Compliance with Sanctions when in FSRU Mode

 

10.1Owner shall not be obliged to operate the Vessel as an FSRU (including taking on board LNG, regasifying LNG or discharging regasified LNG) under the Project in a manner which, in the reasonable judgement of Owner, would be contrary to sanctions laws imposed by the UN Security Council, Norway, the United Kingdom, the European Union, the United States or the government of the Flag State (“Sanctions Laws”).

 

10.2If the Vessel is already operating as an FSRU (including taking on board LNG, regasifying LNG or discharging regasified LNG) in a manner to which new Sanctions Laws are applied, Owner shall have the right to refuse to proceed with the operation and to make arrangements for any LNG on board the Vessel to be discharged and redelivered to the Charterer or the third party who owns it (as notified by Charterer to Owner). The Vessel to remain on hire during such discharge and Charterer to remain responsible for all additional costs and expenses incurred in connection with such discharge.

 

10.3Charterer shall indemnify Owner against any and all claims whatsoever brought by parties to whom regasified LNG is to be sold by Charterer and/or by Project Sub-Charterer against Owner by reason of Owner's compliance with this Clause 10.

 

10.4In the circumstances where Clause 10.1 or 10.2 applies, either Party shall be entitled to require the Vessel to cease to be operated as an FSRU in accordance with this Amendment No. 5 with immediate effect by giving written notice to the other Party, without liability of either Party. In such event the Vessel shall cease to be operated

 

 Page 42 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

as an FSRU unless and until such operation resumes in accordance with Clause 10.5 or the Vessel can operate in such a manner that is not contrary to Sanctions Laws. The circumstances giving rise to any cessation of Vessel being operated as an FSRU shall be deemed to be an event falling within Clause 30(a) of the Charter.

 

10.5Owner and Charterer shall use all reasonable endeavours to apply for and obtain any applicable license or authorisation which will enable the Vessel to operate as an FSRU in accordance with this Amendment No. 5, notwithstanding the circumstances giving rise to the operation of this Clause 10 and upon the obtaining of such license or authorisation either Party shall be entitled to require the Vessel to resume operation as an FSRU in accordance with this Amendment No. 5.

 

10.6Notwithstanding anything in this Clause 10 to the contrary, Owner and Charterer shall not be required to do anything which constitutes a violation of Sanctions Laws or of any other laws and regulations of any country to which either of them is subject.

 

10.7Charterer shall procure that a clause materially similar to this Clause 10 is incorporated into the Project Agreement.

 

11.War and civil disturbances when in FSRU Mode

 

11.1The Vessel shall not be required to continue to or remain at the FSRU Terminal if in Owner’s reasonable opinion it is dangerous for the Vessel to do so as a result of any actual or threatened act of war, hostilities, warlike operations, acts of piracy by any person whatsoever, or by revolution, civil war or civil commotion (“War and Civil Risks”).

 

11.2Should the Vessel be in, or approaching the FSRU Terminal and could be exposed in any way to any of the War and Civil Risks referred to above, the Parties shall, to the extent reasonably practicable meet to agree to mutually acceptable mitigating actions, failing which within ***** (*****) days either Party shall be entitled to require the Vessel to cease to be operated as an FSRU in accordance with this Amendment No. 5 with immediate effect by giving written notice to the other Party, without liability for either of the Parties. The Vessel shall remain on-hire for such period of ***** (*****) days, whereupon the circumstances giving rise to any cessation of Vessel being operated as an FSRU shall be deemed to be an event falling within Clause 30(a) of the Charter.

 

11.3Notwithstanding anything in this Clause 11 to the contrary, the Master shall at all times have the ultimate responsibility for the safety of the Vessel and/or her crew. The Master shall be entitled to refuse the Vessel’s entry into the FSRU Terminal or remove the Vessel from the FSRU Terminal if in the Master’s opinion there is a material risk to the safety of the Vessel and/or her crew if the Vessel were either to enter into or remain at the FSRU Terminal as a consequence of any War and Civil Risk.

 

 Page 43 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

12.Business Principles

 

12.1Owner and Charterer (either directly or through any of their affiliates, directors, officers, employees, masters, crewmembers, agents, representatives or parties acting for or on behalf of them or their affiliates (which, in the case of Owner, shall include members of Owner Covered Group; and in the case of the Charterer, Project Sub-Charterer and its affiliates) shall under or in connection with the entry into this Amendment No. 5:

 

(a)comply with the applicable laws, rules, regulations, decrees and official government orders, including but not limited to the United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010 as amended and the United States of America Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 as amended, or any other applicable jurisdiction, relating to anti-bribery and anti-money laundering, and they shall each respectively take no action which would subject themselves or the other to fines or penalties under such laws, regulations, rules, decrees or orders (“Relevant Requirements”);

 

(b)not make, offer or authorise, any payment, gift, promise, other advantage or anything of value whether directly or through any other person or entity, to or for the use and benefit of any government official or any person where such payment, gift, promise or other advantage would comprise or amount to a facilitation payment or violate the Relevant Requirements;

 

(c)comply with all applicable laws protecting fundamental human rights, including the prohibition of the practice, prevention and eradication of forced, bonded, indentured, involuntary convict or compulsory labour, as well as illegal child labour in its facilities and on any project or in connection with services or work provided in accordance with this Amendment No. 5. Each Party agrees to adopt or abide by sound human rights practices designed to treat workers fairly, with dignity and respect, and provide a safe and healthy environment and conduct business in compliance with applicable environmental laws and labour laws.

 

(d)have and shall maintain in place throughout the Project Period, their own policies and procedures to ensure compliance with this Clause 12, and will enforce them where appropriate;

 

(e)promptly report to the other Party any request or demand for any payment, gift, promise, other advantage, or anything of value received by the first Party in connection with the performance of the provisions of this Amendment No. 5; and

 

 Page 44 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

(f)subject to Clause 12.4, have the right to audit, via an independent third party auditor who has entered into a confidentiality agreement reasonably satisfactory to the Party being audited, the other Party’s records and reports in relation to this Amendment No. 5 at any time (on reasonable prior notice) during and within ***** (*****) years after termination of the Project Period, only in order to verify compliance or otherwise with this Clause 12 and for no other reason. Such records and information shall include at a minimum all invoices for payment submitted by the other Party along with complete supporting documentation. Subject to its obligations of confidentiality, the auditing Party shall have the right to reproduce and retain copies of any of the aforesaid records or information only for the purposes of establishing the other Party’s compliance with this Clause 12 and for no other reason.

 

12.2Either Owner or Charterer may terminate the Charter at any time upon written notice to the other, if in their reasonable judgment, supported by credible evidence that the other is in breach of Clauses 12.1(a), (b) and (c). This right shall be without prejudice to any other rights the non-breaching Party may have in respect of such breach.

 

12.3In the event of non-compliance with Clauses 12.1(a), (b) and (c) based on reasonable judgment supported by credible evidence, under and in connection with the entry into this Amendment No. 5, Owner or Charterer, as applicable, shall indemnify and hold harmless the non-breaching Party against any losses, claims, liabilities, damages, costs or expenses, including legal expenses and fines, incurred by the non-breaching Party. This obligation shall survive the expiration or termination of this Amendment No. 5.

 

12.4In order to comply with Clause 12.1(f) above, each Party shall retain all relevant records and reports for a period of ***** (*****) *****after the end of the Project Period, provided however that a Party shall not be in violation of this Clause 12 if it determines in good faith that it cannot comply with the provision of relevant documentary support in response to a request from the other Party, if the relevant documentation is subject to attorney-client privilege and/or relevant governmental authorities prevent or prohibit the disclosure of any such documentation or information.

 

12.5Each Party represents and warrants to the other, as of the Effective Date, that it has not taken any actions that would, if such actions were undertaken after the Effective Date, conflict with such Party’s obligations under this Clause 12.

 

 Page 45 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

13.Costs and Expenses

 

13.1Charterer shall compensate Owner for all reasonable time spent and all reasonable and documented costs and expenses incurred by Owner in connection with or related to (i) Project Sub-Charterer, and/or the Project (including related to Project Activities as defined in the LLI Agreement), and/or (ii) the negotiation, preparation and completion of this Amendment No. 5 and any other documents related to the Project and/or the Project Agreement, including but not limited to reasonable travel expenses and legal costs and external costs of tax advice and integrity due diligence, provided however that such costs have been approved in advance and in writing by Charterer and that these costs are not already included as operating costs or in the management fee paid for by Charterer to Owner under the Charter.

 

13.2The following costs are deemed to be approved in advance and in writing by Charterer as per the date of this Amendment No. 5:

 

(a)any reasonable legal costs incurred or which may incur, for the owner’s account under the Facility Agreement between the Owner and Owner’s Financiers in connection with or related to the negotiation, preparation and completion of this Amendment No. 5 and any other documents related to the Project and/or the Project Agreement ; and

 

(b)Owner’s reasonable external legal cost in connection with or related to the negotiation, preparation and completion of this Amendment No. 5 and any other documents related to the Project and/or the Project Agreement, documented by copies of the relevant invoices.

 

13.3All invoicing and payments shall be in USD unless otherwise agreed between the Parties, including any payments made in accordance with Clauses 3 and 7.

 

14.Confirmation

 

14.1The Charterer hereby represents, warrants and confirms that the Project Agreement includes provisions:

 

(a)expressly acknowledging the existence of the mortgage over the Vessel executed by the Owner in favour of the Mortgagee;

 

(b)expressly acknowledging that Project Sub-Charterer’s rights under the Project Agreement are subject and subordinate to the Owners’ rights under the Charter (with effect that, without limitation, Project Sub-Charterer shall not assert any claim against the Owner or the Vessel by reason of any breach by the Charterer of the Sub-Charter; and

 

(c)agreement that Project Sub-Charterer shall not assert any claim against the Owner for wrongful interference with Project Sub-Charterer’s rights (or any similar or equivalent claim) in respect of any actions taken by the Owner in compliance with the Charter.

 

 Page 46 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

14.2The Charterer confirms, for the avoidance of doubt, that clause 29(b) of the Charter covers any lien on the Vessel or claim against the Owner asserted by Project Sub-Charterer arising out of or in connection with the Project Agreement or in breach of the provisions of the Project Agreement referred to in Clause 14.1 and the Charterer shall indemnify the Owner against the consequences of (i) any such lien or claim and (ii) any breach by the Charterer of Clause 14.1.

 

15.Third Party Rights

 

No one who is not a party to this Amendment No. 5 shall have any rights under it by reason of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, except that the Mortgagee shall have benefit of and may enforce the provisions of Clause 14 above.

 

16.Law and arbitration

 

16.1This Amendment No. 5 shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law.

 

16.2The provisions of Clause 53 of the Charter ("Law and Arbitration") shall apply to this Amendment No. 5. as if set out in full in this Amendment No. 5.

 

17.Effective date

 

This Amendment No. 5 shall be fully effective (the “Effective Date”) on the later of (i) the date it is executed by both Parties, and (ii) the date the Mortgagee’s consent is given, as required by the terms of the Owner’s financing documents (and the Owner shall promptly confirm to the Charterer on such consent being given by the Mortgagee) and (iii) the date of Owner’s board approval . However, Clause 13 of this Amendment No. 5 shall be fully effective on the date this Amendment No. 5 is executed by both parties.

 

 Page 47 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

18.Exclusion of Consequential Loss

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in, or implied by, this Amendment No. 5 or any conditions of use, each Party shall each bear its own Consequential Loss and shall be responsible for, and shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party in respect of any Consequential Loss suffered or sustained by the indemnifying party and/or the indemnifying party’s Group,  irrespective of the negligence, breach of duty (statutory or otherwise), breach of contract, breach of warranty, or strict liability of the person to be indemnified.  The term “Consequential Loss” as used in this Clause 18 shall mean (a) any consequential or indirect loss under English law; and/or (b) loss and/or deferral of production, loss of product, loss of use, loss of revenue, profit or anticipated profit (if any), losses or damages under other contracts or loss of opportunity, in each case whether direct or indirect to the extent that these are not included in paragraph (a) above, and whether or not foreseeable and in each case howsoever arising out of or related to the use or operation of the FSRU Terminal or otherwise in connection with the FSRU Terminal and not just limited (by implication or otherwise) to the subject-matter of this Amendment No. 5.  The term “Group” as used in this Clause 18 shall mean the parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, agents and sub-contractors (of any tier) of a Party, and in respect of the Charterer, shall also include Project Sub-Charterer and to the extent that the Port Operator has not entered into a port liability agreement with the Owner (or Manager, as the case may be) prior to the Vessel’s arrival at the FSRU Terminal, the Port Operator.

 

(SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW)

 

 Page 48 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 5 as of the date above first written.

  

For and on behalf of Charterer:


  


/s/
Simon Binet

Name: Simon Binet

Title: Finance Director

Witness


 

 


/s/ Anna Kirk

Name: Anna Kirk

   

For and on behalf of Owner:


 


/s/ Ørjan Homme

Witness



 


/s/ Mathias Borgnes

Name: Ørjan Homme

Title: Project Manager

Name: Mathias Borgnes

 

 Page 49 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

APPENDIX 1

 

MAIN PARTICULARS OF VESSEL / GAS FORM C

 

1.1PREAMBLE

 

Ship’s name CAPE ANN
Owner SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd.
Flag - Registry NIS
Builder Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, Korea
Delivery 01st June 2010
Class X1A1 Tanker for Liquefied gas, ship type 2G (Membrane
tank, Maximum pressure 25 kPaG (40 kPaG in FSRU mode), Minimum temperature -163°C),
NAUTICUS (Newbuilding) PLUS-2, CSA-2, CLEAN, COAT-2, E0, F-AMC, TMON, STL, BIS, NAUT-AW

GRT/NRT
International 96,153
Suez 98,727.21

  

Is vessel approved?
USCG Yes
IMO Yes

 

1.2HULL

 

  Meters Feet
LOA 283.0611 928,54
LBP 270.04 885.83
Breadth 43.40 142.39
Depth 26.00 85.30

 

Keel to highest point
Air draught (folded mast)
Assumed ballast draught
55.86
40.4
9.6
181.4
132.5
31.5

 

Summer Load Line 12.4 m Corresponding deadweight 80,780mt
TPC at design draft 11.4 m 99.4 t/cm

 

Mean draft with full bunkers and full cargo
Specific Gravity Mean draft Corresponding DW
0.47 mt/m^3 11.64 m 73,143 mt

 

 Page 50 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

 

Communication equipment
International call sign LADW7
Radio station MMSI 257352000
Satcom B FLEET 77
- Telephone/telex

TEL +870-773-902-060

IP: +44-1224-347-240
TLX 600963967

- Telefax  
Satcom C Telex TLX No.1 425735210
TLX No.2 425735211

 

1.3MACHINERY

 

Main Engine
Type Wartsila: 12V50DF x 3 units
Wartsila: 6L50DF x 1 unit
Max Cont. 3 x 11,400 kW + 1 x 5,700 kW
Grade fuel used

Marine diesel oil (ISO 8217:2010, DMB) ,

 

Heavy Fuel Oil (Low Sulphur <0.5% m/m)

 

When calling ECAs :

 

Marine diesel oil (ISO 8217:2010 (or 2005), DMA) max. sulfur 0.1%

 

Boil-off gas

 

Other machinery
Propeller 1 Fixed Pitch,
Bow Thrusters 2,000 kW x 2 units
6.6 kV, Controllable Pitch, 4-bladed, Ni-Al-Bronze
Stern Thrusters 1,200 kW x 2 units
6.6 kV, Controllable Pitch, 4-bladed, Ni-Al-Bronze

 

Speed/Consumption (propulsion power only)
Guaranteed speed (Round trip, Beaufort Force 5) 19.5 knots
Average consumption on guaranteed speed ***** tons MDO/day (main engine)
***** tons HFO/day (main engine)

 

 Page 51 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Fuel consumption (for information only)
Loading: *****tons/day
Discharging (conventional): ***** tons/day
Anchorage (MDO mode): *****tons/day

 

Fuel consumption during regasified LNG discharge (for information only)
Regas rate (mmscuf/day) 120 250 450 500 600 712,5 750
Regas rate (mt/day) 101 210 278 420 504 599 630
Fuel consumption, NG
(mt/day)
***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** *****
Fuel consumption, MDO
(mt/day)
***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** *****


Note:
Gas consumption at DF engine(s) and 2 regas boilers based on Low Calorific Value (LCV) of 49,900 KJ/kg
Diesel oil consumption as pilot fuel at DF engine(s) based on Low Calorific Value (LCV) of 42,700 KJ/kg

 

Permanent bunkers capacity
HFO 4,311 m^3 MDO/MGO 1,399 m^3
    TOTAL 5,710 m^3

 

1.4CARGO INSTALLATION

 

Transportable products and respective quantities *)
Tank
No.
20 °C
100%
M3
-163 °C
98.5 %
M3
-163 °C
98.5%
MT
S.G. 0.47
-163°C
70%L
M3
-163°C
70%H
M3
-163°C
10%L
M3
-163°C
10%H
M3
1 19,404 19,113 8,983 12,542 13,212 1,426 1,490
2 41,913 41,284 19,404 41,913 31,247 6,635 3,949
3 41,913 41,284 19,404 41,913 31,244 6,635 3,945
4 41,916 41,287 19,405 41,916 31,246 6,636 3,947
Total 145,146 142,969 67,195 138,284 106,948 201,332 13,329


*) Approx. figures per 1 July 2009 based on a cargo specific gravity of 470 kg/m^3
The cargo tank system is GTT Mark III, reinforced to all cargo tank area except tank bottom in accordance with GTT document N500 CR009.

 

 Page 52 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

Scantlings of the cargo tanks are based on a maximum density of cargo of 500 kg/m3.

 

Tank working pressure
Maximum pressure (LNGC mode) 25 kPa gauge
Maximum pressure (FSRU Mode) 40 kPa gauge
Minimum pressure -1 kPa gauge
Minimum temperature acceptable in tanks -163ºC

  

Acceptable cargo filling levels (LNGC mode)
Lower criteria Below 10% of cargo tank height
Upper criteria Above 70% of cargo tank height

 

Loading & discharging time
for LNG
12 hours, excluding time for connecting, disconnecting,
cooling down, topping up and custody transfer
measurement

 

Discharging time for regasified LNG
Regas rate (mmscuf/hr) 120 250 450 500 600 712.5 750
Regas rate (mt/hr) 101 210 378 420 504 599 630
Regas duration (days) 26.0 12.5 7.0 6.3 5.2 4.4 4.2


 

1.5CARGO MACHINERY

 

Cargo pumps 1,700 m^3/h @155 mlc x 8 units
Cargo pump location 2 in each cargo tank
Max permissible specific gravity 500 kg/m
Time for discharging full cargo using all
cargo pumps against no backpressure
12 hours, excluding time for connecting,
disconnecting, cooling down, topping up
and custody transfer measurement
Unpumpable cargo volume 1,450 m^3

 

Heel LNG for cooling down 500 m^3
Fuel LNG for ballast voyage 3,300 m^3
Cargo remaining onboard in cargo tanks
after completion pumping
5,250 m^3

 

Spray pumps 50m^3/h @145 mlc x 4 units
Fuel Gas Pumps

40m3/h@215mlc x 2 units
Located in tank No. 3 and 4

 

10m3/h@155mlc x 1 unit

Emergency cargo pump/ LNG Feed Pump 650m^3/h @145 mlc x 3 units
Located in tank No. 2, 3 and 4

 

 Page 53 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

High duty cargo compressor 32,000 m^3/h x 2 units
Low duty cargo compressor 4,350 m^3/h x 2 units
Nitrogen plant 120 Nm^3 x 2 units
Inert gas plant 14,000 Nm^3/h x 1 unit

 

Composition of inert gas
Carbon dioxide, CO2 Max 14% by volume
Oxygen max., O2 1.0% by volume
Carbon monoxide max. ; CO 100 ppm
HC 0%
Soot Bacharach 0
Sulphur oxides max., Sox 10 ppm
Nitrogen oxides max. ; NOx 100 ppm
Remainder N2, H2, Air
Dewpoint -45°C at atm.

 

Grade fuel used DMA: ISO 8217
Discharge pressure Max. 25 kPaG

 

State if any shore supply of liquid nitrogen may be required NO
May be required for purging of tanks and insulation spaces
What quantity? N/A

 

Gas freeing
Can this operation be carried out at sea? Yes

 

Heaters
Cargo Vapor Heater (warm-up) 16,940kg/h x 2 units (-125ºC to 0ºC)
Cargo Vapor Heater (boil-off) 4,730kg/h x 2 units (-100ºC to 45ºC)

 

Guaranteed boil-off rates
Laden condition 0.16% / 24h
Ballast condition 0.10% / 24h

 

Fuel Gas Vaporizers
LNG vaporizer 23,970 kg/h x 1 unit
Forcing vaporizer 5,800 kg/h x 1 unit

 

 Page 54 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

1.5MEASURING APPARATUS

 

  Type and location Number
Primary level gauge system
Secondary level gauge system
Radar sensor, top of each tank
Radar sensor
4
4
Cargo temperature Temperature Sensor;
Vapor space at liquid dome +
Liquid space (0,10,50,95%) on tank
bottom and pump column
40
2 x 5 in each
tank
Absolute pressure transmitter Vapor dome of each tank 4

 

1.6CARGO LINES

 

Is vessel fitted with midship manifolds Yes, 2
Distance from cargo manifold to stem (FP) 132 m
Distance from manifold to stern (AP) 138 m
Height cargo manifold above deck  4.8 m
Height manifold above working platform  1.4 m
Height cargo manifold above waterline when light 21.2 m
Height cargo manifold above waterline when loaded 19.4 m
Distance manifold from ship’s rail 3.15 m
Distance between loading and vapor return connections 3.0 m
Distance from aft (P/S) HP manifold (1/3) to Stem (FP) 120m
Distance from fwd (P/S) HP manifold (2/4) to stem (FP) 113.5m
Distance from aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) to stern (AP) 150m
Distance from fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) to stern (AP) 156.5m
Height aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S)  above deck 4.9
Height fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) above deck 4.9
Height aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) above working platform 1.4
Height fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) above working platform 1.4
Height aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) above waterline in ballast

Assumed Draft: 9.6m

 

21.3

 

Height fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) above waterline in ballast

Assumed Draft: 9,6m

 

21.3

 

Height aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) above waterline in loaded condition

Assumed Draft: 12,4m

 

18.5m

 

 

 Page 55 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

Height fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) above waterline in loaded condition

Assumed Draft: 12,4m

 

18.5m

 

Distance aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) from ship’s rail 3.4m
Distance fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) from ship’s rail 3.4m
Distance between aft HP manifold (1/3) (P/S) to V/L 12m
Distance between fwd HP manifold (2/4) (P/S) to V/L 18.5m
Distance from HP manifold 5 (P) stem (FP) 77.25m
Distance from HP manifold 6 (P) to stem (FP) 74.75m
Distance from HP manifold 5 (P) to stern (AP) 192.75m
Distance from HP manifold 6 (P) to stern (AP) 195.25m
Height HP manifold 5 (P)  above deck (upper deck) 4.9m
Height HP manifold 6 (P) above deck (upper deck) 4.9m
Height HP manifold 5 (P) above working platform (manifold deck) 1.51m
Height HP manifold 6 (P) above working platform (manifold deck) 1.51m
Height HP manifold 5 (P) above waterline in ballast

Assumed Draft: 9.6m

 

21.3m

 

Height HP manifold 6 (P) above waterline in ballast

Assumed Draft: 9.6m

 

21.3m

 

Height HP manifold 5 (P) above waterline in loaded condition

Assumed Draft: 12.4m

 

18.5m

 

Height HP manifold 6 (P) above waterline in loaded condition

Assumed Draft: 12.4m

 

18.5m

 

Distance HP manifold 5 (P) from ship’s rail 3.4m
Distance HP manifold 6 (P) from ship’s rail 3.4m
Distance between HP manifold 5 (P) to V/L 54.75m
Distance between HP manifold 6 (P) to V/L 57.25m
Is vessel fitted with stern discharge No
Is vessel fitted with fore discharge No

 

 Page 56 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

Dimension of lines
  Diameter Flange size
Liquid 400 mm 16”
Vapour Line 400 mm 16”
CNG HP Discharge Line 300 mm 12”

 

What reducers onboard
Number Diameter Pressure rating
3 16”/12” 10 kg/cm^2



 Page 57 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

1.8 LNG REGASIFICATION SYSTEM

 

Liquid inlet conditions:
Pressure
Temperature
Liquid volume flow
Composition (mass %)

 

5 bara
-160ºC (256ºF)
479.8 m^3/h x 3 units
Typical Trinidad composition as given in
Appendix I to Schedule 1, para 11 (c)

Gas outlet condition:
Volume
Pressure
Temperature

 

250 mmscuf/day x 3 units
105 bar
10 ºC

Capacity 210,000 kg/hr x 3 units
LNG booster pump number 6 units
LNG booster pump discharge pressure 120 bar
LNG booster pump suction pressure 5 bar
LNG booster pump temperature -160°C

 

Steam pressure from boilers (saturated) 28 kg/cm^2
   
LNG/brine Shell & Tube Heat exchanger 3 units
Steam/brine PCHE 3 units
Separate steam and condensate section
each unit
Brine circulation pump 680 m^3/h x 6 units


1.9 GAS METERING SYSTEM

 

Ultrasonic Gas Metering System Ultrasonic gas flow meters x 2 units
Pressure transmitters x 2 units
Temperature transmitters x 2 units
Gas Analyzer System Sample probe x 2 unit
Gas chromatographs x 2 units
Supplementary Gas Chromatograph x 1
unit
Analyzer cabinet x 1 unit
Metering Control System Metering cabinet x 1 unit
Flow computers x 2 units
Supplementary flow computers x 2 units

 

 Page 58 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

1.10 BALLAST SYSTEM

Pumps Particular
No. Three (3)
Type Vertical single stage, centrifugal
Prime mover Electric motor
Discharge rate 2,500 m3/h
Total head 30 mwc (S.G.: 1.025)

 

1.11 ODORANT INJECTION SYSTEM – Not installed

 

   
   

 

1.12 LIFTING DEVICE

Location Aft Amidships Fwd
Type

2 x Provision crane (P/S)

Electro hydr. (jib type)

2 x Hose crane
(P/S) Electro hydr. (jib type)
1 x Regas and STL Crane,  Electro hydr. (jib type)
Number and lifting
capacity

SWL 5T X 16.3 m (SB)

SWL 15T X 17.5 m (PS)

SWL 11T X 17.4 m / SWL 2T (personnel lift)

SWL 12T X 17.4 m Port

SWL 10T x 30 m / SWL 2T x 30 m
Max. distance from
ship’s side of lifting hook
5 m

5 m

Increased outreach for STS boom 13 m

6 m


 Page 59 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

  

APPENDIX 2

 

Discharge Performance Certificate

 

 

 

 

 

[date]

 

 

 

Discharge Performance Certificate

 

 

 

Reference is made to Clause 27 (Performance) (b) (ii) of the Time Charterparty dated 20 March 2007 (as amended) (the “Charter”) and made between SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. as owner (the “Owner”) and Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch as charterer (the “Charterer”).

 

Terms defined in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in this certificate unless given a different meaning herein.

 

On [date] the Actual Discharge Rate was [reduced] [increased] from [ ] MMScf/day to [ ] MMScf/day during regasification of LNG and has been in operation for ***** (*****) periods of at least ***** (*****) hours. As of [date] such [reduced] [increased] Actual Discharge Rate, being [ ] MMScf/day, shall be the [Lowest Performance] [Normal Performance].

 

For and on behalf of Owner

 

 

_____________________
Name:

Title:

For and on behalf of Charterer

 

 

_____________________
Name:

Title:

 

 Page 60 of 61 

SRV Cape Ann – Amendment No. 5

 

APPENDIX 3

 

Owner’s Permits Matrix

  

Source of information Issuing Authority  Permit/ License/ Approval Description
H-Energy/Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. PHO Mumbai Ship Sanitation Certificate renewal PHO Mumbai is authority for issuing ship sanitation control certificate and / or ship sanitation control exemption certificate as applicable
H-Energy/Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. JSWJPL/ Bureau of Immigration Dock Entry Pass Any Gov. ID & Photo for Indian visitors / Passport & Valid visa for Foreigners; NOC need to obtain from Immigration for Foreign national for Dock entry pass. One day prior notice required along with said documents for preparing dock passes 
H-Energy/Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Bureau of Immigration Temporary Landing Permits TLP issue only for 3 days. Valld Passport / CDC, letter from Master, Immigration Permission, FRRO permission, & Confirmed ticket to home town required for issuance of TLP (applicable for foreign nationals only)
H-Energy/Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Bureau of Immigration Registration of Foreigners FRRO registration will required to be carried out within 14days of any crew member's landing in Mumbai.
H-Energy/Atlantic Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Bureau of Immigration VISA Extension As applicable; Person to visit FRRO for visa extension and possible to get on the same day.

 

 Page 61 of 61 

 

 

Exhibit 4.26.5

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

AMENDMENT NO. 6

 

 

 

Dated 1 April 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

to

 

SRV LNG CARRIER TIME CHARTERPARTY

(HULL 1689 / CAPE ANN)

 

 

 

between

 

SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD

 

and

 

TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, LONDON, MEYRIN-GENEVA BRANCH

 

 

 

dated 20 March 2007

 

 

 

 

This amendment no. 6 (the "Amendment No. 6") is made on this 1 day of April 2020

 

BETWEEN

 

(i)SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., a company incorporated and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands ("Owner")

 

AND

 

(ii)Total Gas & Power Limited, London, Meyrin-Geneva Branch (a branch office of TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED # UK company number 02172239) registered in Geneva, Switzerland under number CHE-309.541.427 ("Charterer")

 

(each a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties")

 

RECITALS

 

(A)Disputes have arisen between the Parties under the Time Charterparty originally dated 20 March 2007 as novated by novation agreements dated 20 December 2007, 25 March 2010 and 20 December 2019 and as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated 20 June 2012, Amendment No. 2 dated 20 June 2012, Amendment No. 3 dated 23 April 2014, Amendment No. 4 dated 23 October 2017, Amendment No. 5 dated 20 February 2020 and as further novated and/or amended from time to time (the "Charter").

 

(B)In order to settle the disputes, the Parties have agreed that as from the date hereof any claim by Charterer in relation to excess boil-off pursuant to clause 27 of the Charterparty, shall be determined in accordance with the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure annexed hereto.

 

(C)The Parties now wish to enter into this Amendment No. 6 to amend certain provisions of the Charter.

 

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained (and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency the Parties hereby acknowledge), the Parties have agreed as follows:

 

1DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

1.1Terms defined in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment No. 6, unless defined below.

 

1.2The rules of interpretation of the Charter shall apply to this Amendment No. 6 as if set out in this Amendment No. 6.

 

2BOIL-OFF CALCULATION PROCEDURE

 

2.1The Parties agree that:

 

2.1.1The amount ascertained in favour of the Charterer under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure will be the sole remedy in respect of any claims Charterer may have in relation to the maximum daily boil-off under clause 27 from the date hereof.

 

  Page 2

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

2.1.2Charterer shall only be entitled to make deductions from hire in relation to excess boil-off calculated under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure in accordance with the provisions of the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure.

 

2.2The Parties agree that Appendix I Section 7 shall be amended to provide that, for the purpose of any claims pursuant to the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure:

 

2.2.1the Performance Period referred to in Section 7 shall be construed to mean a period of ***** months (or part thereof), the first of which will be deemed to expire at *****.

 

2.2.2The performance of the Vessel shall be assessed within *****days after each Voyage, using Voyage as defined under the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure.

 

3EFFECT OF AMENDMENT

 

Except as specifically provided herein, the Charter, as amended hereby, remains in full force and effect.

 

4GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION

 

Clause 53 of the Charter shall apply to this Amendment No. 6.

 

This Amendment No. 6 has been executed and is delivered and takes effect on the date stated at the beginning of it.

 

 

 

Signed by    /s/ Veronica B. Sandnes  
    signature  
for and on behalf of    VERONICA B. SANDNES  
SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD   print name ATTORNEY-IN-FACT  
       
       
Signed by    /s/ Laurent Vivier  
    signature  
for and on behalf of    Laurent Vivier  
TOTAL GAS & POWER LIMITED, LONDON, MEYRIN-GENEVA BRANCH   print name  

 

  Page 3

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

Boil-off gas performance calculation procedure: a contractual code for evaluating the boil off performance of vessel “CAPE ANN” (the “Vessel”)

 

This calculation procedure (the “Boil-Off Calculation Procedure” or the “Procedure”) sets out the contractual code for establishing liability and calculating the relevant deduction from hire for breach of the boil off guarantees under a charterparty dated 20 March 2007 (the “Charter”). Owner and Charterer have agreed this shall be the sole remedy for any claims against Owner for excess boil off.

 

Terms defined in the Charter shall have the same meaning when used in the Boil-Off Calculation Procedure unless separately defined below.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Owner and Charterer have agreed to implement this Boil-Off Calculation Procedure to provide for a method of evaluating the boil off performance of the Vessel when operating in LNG carrier mode. The Procedure is based on the following principles:

 

(A)The Vessel’s boil off performance will be assessed after each Voyage.

 

(B)The actual amount of boil off on a Voyage in m3 shall be calculated by subtracting the volume of LNG contained in the Vessel's tanks at gauging after the sea passage while at berth from the volume therein at gauging before the sea passage while at berth (closing CTMS to opening CTMS).

 

(C)The actual boil off calculated pursuant to B above will be converted to MT of HFO equivalent and compared to the boil off gas allowance permitted under this Procedure.

 

(D)Performance will be assessed within ***** days after each Voyage by the respective operational departments, based on data reported by the Master in Owner’s database. If such assessment shows a boil-off performance falling below the performance guaranteed under this Procedure, then subject to paragraph 13 below, the Charterer shall be entitled to a deduction from hire under Clause 12(a) of the Charterparty equal to the value of the excess boil off gas calculated using this Procedure. Any such potential hire deduction for excess boil off will be reconciled immediately after the performance assessment has been completed.

 

(E)Charterer shall be granted access as soon as possible to Owner’s database, which will gather information received from the Vessel that is to be used in this procedure as soon as such capability and relevant platforms are established (the “Database”, containing “Data”). Pending such access being granted, the Owner shall make available to the Charterer an extract of Owner’s database promptly after each Voyage and no later than ***** days after each Voyage.

 

(F)The Parties shall cross check the sum of flow meter readings reported in noon reports over the Voyage with CTMS to CTMS. In cases where a disproportionate discrepancy is observed, each Party shall notify the other and discuss such discrepancies in good faith and in accordance with the Procedure.

 

(G)The Procedure will not apply to boil off during Adverse Weather Periods and such Periods will be excluded from the performance calculations thereunder.

 

  Page 4

 

 

(H)During an Adverse Weather Period, the aggregate of flow meter measurements as reported in m3 of LNG in the Database from engines and GCU (mass flow meter from engines and orifice GCU) and the period between the measurements shall be excluded from the calculations under the Procedure.

 

(I)Boil off performance after the deduction of Adverse Weather Periods (as a percentage of boil off gas (“BOG”) rate calculated over a Voyage) cannot be less favourable for Owner as the calculation without such deduction;

 

(J)BOG resulting from forced vaporization carried out under Charterer’s written instructions shall be accounted for in the Procedure in accordance with the below.

 

FORCED VAPORISATION IN GAS MODE

 

1Forced vaporisation may happen only with Charterers’ written consent.

 

2Speed required to execute a Voyage and the corresponding fuel required to achieve that speed is taken into account in assessing boil off performance when sailing in gas mode only.

 

3The parties recognise the challenges of accurately determining the quantity of LNG used in forced vaporisation because there are several ways in which forced vaporisation is achieved (e.g. by use of the forcing vaporiser, cargo tank spraying with liquid circulation, cofferdam temperature control etc.). Therefore, the Parties agree:

 

3.1not to make deductions from the performance calculations for forced vaporization in the Procedure; and instead

 

3.2to use the below speed versus consumption table to account for theoretical forced vaporization needed to reach any given speed during a Voyage.

 

4For the sake of simplicity, this mechanism shall be used for both laden and ballast Voyages performed in gas mode.

 

VESSEL SPEED VS CONSUMPTION CURVE

 

5The Parties have established a speed versus consumption curve for the sole purpose of the Procedure, as set out in Table A below.

 

6The actual boil off quantity measured during a Voyage in m3 shall be converted into metric tons (MT) of HFO equivalent in accordance with this Procedure, and that figure shall be compared with the accumulated daily fuel consumption derived from Table A (after deductions made for those circumstances excluded from the Procedure). The difference in MT of HFO equivalent between the measured boil off quantity converted in MT of HFO equivalent and the Table A boil off quantity, if positive, is the excess boil off quantity for the purpose of establishing liability under Clause 27 of each Charter respectively and for the purpose of calculating the quantum of the applicable hire deduction in accordance with this Procedure.

 

  Page 5

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

TABLE A

 

Reference Fuel Consumption Table
In Tons of HFO equivalent per day
kt Laden Ballast
19.5 ***** *****
19 ***** *****
18.5 ***** *****
18 ***** *****
17.5 ***** *****
17 ***** *****
16.5 ***** *****
16 ***** *****
15.5 ***** *****
15 ***** *****
14.5 ***** *****
14 ***** *****

 

EXCLUSIONS

 

7When Charterer gives written orders directing cargo conditioning or tank pressure to be reduced to meet certain discharge terminal requirements, the period from when these particular operations have commenced until the end of the particular Voyage shall be excluded from the calculations hereunder.

 

DUAL FUEL MODE

 

8Charterer at its sole discretion may, from time to time during a Voyage, instruct the Vessel in writing to use dual fuel mode burning in order to avoid forced vaporization and consequently use natural boil off gas (NBOG) supplemented by burning liquid fuel, instead of forcing additional LNG for propulsion.

 

9Consequently, during period of Dual Fuel mode, boil off gas allowance shall be the daily guaranteed NBOG allowance being respectively *****MT/d fuel oil equivalent for ballast Voyage and *****MT/d of fuel oil equivalent in laden Voyage. For the sake of clarity Adverse Weather Periods may apply during a dual fuel mode period and shall be excluded from the calculations in accordance with the provisions set out in this Procedure.

 

  Page 6

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

10Any liquid fuel consumed during periods of dual fuel mode shall be removed from the Boil Off Calculation Procedure for said Voyage.

 

VALUATION OF BOIL OFF GAS IN EXCESS

 

11Where excess boil off on a Voyage is established under this Procedure, such excess boil off will be valued by way of the below calculation.

 

12For the purpose of the Boil Off Calculation Procedure, the energy content of one cubic meter of LNG shall be determined by surveyor report at loading for laden Voyages and at unloading for ballast Voyages and expressed in MMBtu/m3.

 

12.1For Voyages ending east of Suez, the excess boil-off gas shall be valued at the average JKM price published by Platts at the date of Voyage start for the month ahead (Cumulative monthly average for the month ahead – code AAOVS00)

 

12.2For Voyages ending west of Suez, the excess boil-off gas shall be valued at the average TTF price published by Heren at the date of Voyage start for the month ahead. As TTF is published in Euro/MWh (25°C,1atm), the conversion factors to be used to obtain the TTF price in USD/MBtu (25°C1atm) shall be the following:

 

12.31 MWh = 3.4121456 MBtu

 

12.41 MWH (25°C,1atm) = 3.42068432 MBTU (0°C, 1atm)

 

12.51 MWH (25°C,1 atm) = 3.41726706 MBTU (15°C) 1atm)

 

12.6Euro/USD exchange rate of the day of Voyage start published by ECB (https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/policy_and_exchange_rates/euro_reference_ex change_rates/html/eurofxref-graph-usd.en.html [ecb.europa.eu])]

 

13The value of excess boil off calculated as above shall be accumulated after each Voyage and settled on a ***** basis (*****) for Voyages completed in preceding ***** months (or part thereof) and if such deduction is agreed by both parties it shall be deducted from hire with ***** hire invoices respectively. In the event of dispute, the undisputed portion (if any) shall be deducted from hire as above, and any disputed portion shall be referred to arbitration under the Charterparty.

 

14The attached Excel worksheets demonstrate how the parties have agreed to perform excess boil off calculations under this Procedure and form part of this Procedure. Excel worksheets calculation method shall prevail in case of dispute with Procedure’s wording.

 

REVIEW OF BOIL OFF GAS PERFORMANCE CALCULATION PROCEDURE

 

15Owner and Charterer shall verify the effectiveness of the Procedure after ***** of implementation.

 

16If required Owner and Charterer shall discuss in good faith and agree on potential adjustments to the Procedure.

 

  Page 7

 

 

SPECIFIC TERMS IN THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN REDACTED BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED, AND THE TERMS HAVE BEEN MARKED AT THE APPROPRIATE PLACE WITH FIVE ASTERISKS (*****).

 

DEFINITIONS

 

Adverse Weather Period” for the purpose of calculating boil off performance under this procedure, means any day, noon to noon, when winds are Force ***** or above on the Beaufort scale for more than ***** hours in aggregate.

 

“BOG” means boil off gas.

 

Forced Vaporisation” means purposefully generating additional boil off solely to provide more fuel”.

 

“Voyage” means a sea passage of the Vessel either in laden or in ballast condition, that starts at closing of CTMS before the Vessel leaves berth at one LNG terminal and ends at the opening of CTMS when the Vessel arrives at berth at the next LNG terminal. A Voyage may or may not be part of a round trip. In case of partial unloading, both ***** leg and the ***** leg shall count as laden Voyages and performance and calculation shall be conducted accordingly.

 

  Page 8

Exhibit 4.36.3 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of May 28, 2019 (this "Amendment") is between Höegh LNG Partners LP, a Marshall Islands limited partnership (the "Borrower"), and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd., a Bermuda company (the "Lender").

 

INTRODUCTION

 

A.               The Borrower and the Lender have entered into the Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of August 12, 2014 (as amended, restated, amended and restated or otherwise modified from time to time (including pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1 dated as of February 28 2016 and Amendment No. 2 dates as of January 29 2018, to Revolving Loan Agreement, and between the Borrower and the Lender), the "Revolving Loan Agreement").

 

B.               The Borrower and the Lender wish to amend the Revolving Loan Agreement on the terms, and subject to the conditions, set forth below.

 

THEREFORE, in fulfillment of the foregoing, the Borrower and the Lender hereby agree as follows:

 

Section 1.             Definitions; References. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, each term used in this Amendment which is defined in the Revolving Loan Agreement has the meaning assigned to such term in the Revolving Loan Agreement.

 

Section 2.             Amendment. Upon the satisfaction of the conditions specified in Section 4 of this Amendment, and effective as of the date set forth above, the Revolving Loan Agreement shall be amended as follows:

 

(a)             Section 1.1, Applicable Margin shall mean 1.4% in 2019, 3% in 2020 and 4% from 2021 and onwards.

 

(b)             Section 1.1, Maturity Date shall mean 1 January 2023

 

Section 3.             Representations and Warranties. The Borrower represents and warrants to the Lender that:

 

(a)             the representations and warranties set forth in the Revolving Loan Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Amendment (except to the extent such representations and warranties relate to an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be true and correct in all material respects as of such earlier date);

 

(b)             (i) the execution, delivery, and performance of this Amendment are within the company power and authority of the Borrower and have been duly authorized by appropriate proceedings and (ii) this Amendment constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Borrower, enforceable against the Borrower in accordance with its terms, except as limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,

 

 

 

 

moratorium, or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and general principles of equity; and

 

(c)             as of the date of this Amendment and after giving effect hereto, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing.

 

Section 4.             Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof, and the Revolving Loan Agreement shall be amended as provided herein, upon the occurrence of all of the following: (a) the Borrower's and the Lender's duly and validly executing originals of this Amendment and delivery thereof to the Lender; and (b) the representations and warranties in this Amendment being true and correct in all material respects before and after giving effect to this Amendment.

 

Section 5.             Effect on Revolving Loan Agreement. Except as amended herein, the Revolving Loan Agreement remains in full force and effect as originally executed, and nothing herein shall act as a waiver of any of the Lender's rights under the Revolving Loan Agreement, as amended. Any breach of representations, warranties, and covenants under this Amendment may be a Default or Event of Default under the Revolving Loan Agreement.

 

Section 6.             Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

 

Section 7.             Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original.

 

 

[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.]

 

 

 

 

THIS WRITTEN AMENDMENT AND THE REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT REPRESENT THE FINAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE PARTIES HERETO AND MAY NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES HERETO. THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO.

 

EXECUTED as of the date first set forth above.

 

  BORROWER:
      
  HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP
      
      
  By:  /s/ Steffen Føreid
  Name:  Steffen Føreid
  Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      
      
  LENDER:
   
  HÖEGH LNG HOLDINGS LTD.
      
      
  By:  /s/ Sveinung J.S. Støhle
  Name:   
  Title:  Authorised Signatory

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 4.37.2

 

 

Dated 20 December 2019

 

Between

 

SRV JOINT GAS LTD.

as Borrower

 

and

 

DNB BANK ASA

(formerly known as DnB NOR BANK ASA)

as Security Trustee and as Agent for the Finance Parties

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO A USD300,000,000

TERM FACILITY AGREEMENT DATED 20 DECEMBER 2007

(AS AMENDED ON 25 MARCH 2010, 26 AUGUST 2010, 25 JULY 2014,

24 FEBRUARY 2015 AND 7 DECEMBER 2016)

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Ince

Aldgate Tower

2 Leman Street

London E1 8QN

 

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7481 0010

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7481 4968

 

 1 

 

THIS AGREEMENT is dated 20 December 2019 and made between:

 

(1)SRV JOINT GAS LTD. as borrower (the "Borrower");

 

(2)DNB BANK ASA (formerly known as DnB NOR Bank ASA) as security trustee (the "Security Trustee"); and

 

(3)DNB BANK ASA (formerly known as DnB NOR Bank ASA) as agent for the Finance Parties (the "Agent").

 

IT IS AGREED as follows:

 

1DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

1.1Definitions

 

In this Agreement:

 

"Amended Facility Agreement" means the Original Facility Agreement, as amended by this Agreement.

 

"Charter" means the time charterparty of the Ship dated 20 March 2007, originally entered into between the Borrower and the Original Charterer, as novated by a first novation agreement dated 25 March 2010 entered into between the Borrower, the Original Charterer and Global LNG SAS (formerly known as Global LNG Supply SA) as replacement charterer (the “Intermediate Charterer”) and as amended by the First Charter Amendment, the Second Charter Amendment, a third amendment dated 23 April 2014, the Fourth Charter Amendment and to be further amended by a second novation agreement dated December 2019 entered into between the Borrower, the Intermediate Charterer and the Charterer (the “Novation Agreement”).

 

Charterer” means Total Gas and Power Limited, a company incorporated in England with company number 02172239 and having its registered office at 13th Floor, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5BF and trading through its Geneva Branch office Total Gas and Power Limited, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch at Route de l’Aeroport 10, 1215, Geneva, Switzerland;

 

“Charter Assignment” means the assignment of the rights of the Borrower under the Charter to be executed by the Borrower and the Security Trustee in agreed form replacing the charter assignment for the Ship dated 25 March 2010 (the “Existing Charter Assignment”).

 

“Charter Ownership Undertaking” means the undertaking from the Project Sponsor as defined in Clause 3.3(a) to the Borrower dated December 2019replacing the charter ownership undertaking dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Charter Ownership Undertaking”);

 

“Comfort Letter” means the letter dated December 2019from the Project Sponsor to the Borrower replacing the comfort letter dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Comfort Letter”);

 

"Effective Date" means the date on which the Agent confirms to the Borrower that it has received each of the documents listed in Schedule 1 (Conditions Precedent) in a form and substance satisfactory to the Agent.

 

 2 

 

“Existing Consent and Agreement” means the Consent and Agreement dated 25 March 2010 between the Borrower, the Intermediate Charterer and the Security Trustee;

 

“Information Sharing Letter” means the letter from the Project Sponsor dated December 20192019 replacing the information sharing letter dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Information Sharing Letter”);

 

"Original Facility Agreement" means the Facility Agreement dated 20 December 2007 as amended on 25 March 2010, 26 August 2010, 25 July 2014, 24 February 2015 and 7 December 2016 between the Borrower, the Agent and the other Finance Parties; and

 

“Consent and Agreement” means the Consent and Agreement to be made between the Borrower, the Charterer and the Security Trustee, in the form prescribed in the Charter (but amended in accordance with the Novation Agreement) replacing the Existing Consent and Agreement.

 

“Replacement Security Documents” means:

 

(a)the Charter Assignment; and

 

(b)the Consent and Agreement.

 

Replacement Underlying Documentsmeans:

 

(a)the Charter Ownership Undertaking;

 

(b)the Comfort Letter;

 

(c)the Information Sharing Letter; and

 

(d)the Charter.

 

1.2Incorporation of defined terms

 

(a)Unless a contrary indication appears, a term used in the Original Facility Agreement has the same meaning in this Agreement.

 

(b)The principles of construction set out in the Original Facility Agreement shall have effect as if set out in this Agreement.

 

1.3Clauses

 

(a)In this Agreement any reference to a "Clause" or a "Schedule" is, unless the context otherwise requires, a reference to a Clause or a Schedule of this Agreement.

 

(b)Clause and Schedule headings are for ease of reference only.

 

1.4Third Party Rights

 

A person who is not a party to this Agreement has no right under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce or to enjoy the benefit of any term of this Agreement.

 

 3 

 

1.5Designation

 

In accordance with the Original Facility Agreement, the Agent and the Borrower designate this Agreement as a Finance Document.

 

2CONSENTS

 

With effect from the Effective Date, the Agent (acting with the consent and authorisation of the Majority Lenders) gives its consent to the amendments to the Charter as contained in the Novation Agreement (as required under Clause 23.12 of the Original Facility Agreement and Clause 4.2 of the Charter Assignment).

 

3AMENDMENTS

 

3.1With effect from the Effective Date, Clause 1.1 of the Original Facility Agreement shall be amended as follows:

 

(a)by replacing the definition of “Charter” and “Charterer” in the Original Facility Agreement with the definition of such term in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement;

 

(b)by replacing the definitions of “Charter Ownership Undertaking”, “Comfort Letter and “Information Sharing Letter” in the Original Facility Agreement with the definitions of such terms in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement;

 

3.2With effect from the Effective Date, by construing references to the Charter Assignment and the Consent and Agreement to the Replacement Security Documents as defined in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement.

 

3.3With effect from 13 July 2018 (being the date on which the ownership of the Intermediate Charterer was transferred from GDF Suez S.A. to Elf Acquitaine S.A.S. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Total S.A.):

 

(a)The definition of Project Sponsor in Clause 1.1 of the Original Facility Agreement is replaced with the following:

 

“Project Sponsor” means TOTAL S.A., a société anonyme incorporated under the laws of France, having its registered office at 2 place Jean Millier – La Défénse 6-92400 Courbevoie France.

 

3.4Each of the other Finance Documents shall be amended so that any reference therein to “the Facility Agreement” shall be construed as a reference to the Amended Facility Agreement.

 

4CONTINUITY AND FURTHER ASSURANCE

 

4.1Continuing obligations

 

The provisions of the Original Facility Agreement and the other Finance Documents shall, save as amended by this Agreement, continue in full force and effect.

 

4.2Further assurance

 

The Borrower shall, at the request of the Agent and at its own expense, do all such acts and things necessary or desirable to give effect to the amendments effected or to be effected pursuant to this Agreement.

 

 4 

 

5FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES

 

5.1Transaction expenses

 

The Borrower shall promptly on demand pay the Agent the amount of all costs and expenses (including legal fees) reasonably incurred in connection with the registration, preparation, printing and execution of this Agreement and any other documents referred to in this Agreement.

 

5.2Enforcement Costs

 

The Borrower shall, within three Business Days of demand, pay to each Finance Party the amount of all costs and expenses (including legal fees) incurred by that Finance Party in connection with the enforcement, or the preservation, of any rights under this Agreement.

 

6MISCELLANEOUS

 

6.1Incorporation of terms

 

The provisions of Clause 32 (Notices), Clause 34 (Partial Invalidity), Clause 35 (Remedies, Waivers and Conflicts) and Clause 39 (Enforcement) of the Original Facility Agreement shall be incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full in this Agreement and as if references in these clauses to "this Agreement" are references to this Agreement.

 

6.2Counterparts

 

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and this has the same effect as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this Agreement.

 

7GOVERNING LAW

 

This Agreement and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it shall be governed by English law.

 

This Agreement has been entered into on the date stated at the beginning of this Agreement.

 

 5 

 

SCHEDULE 1

 

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

1.Borrower

 

(a)A Certified Copy of the constitutional and incorporation documents of the Borrower.

 

(b)A Certified Copy of a resolution of the board of directors of the Borrower:

 

(i)approving the terms of, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and the Novation Agreement resolving that it execute this Agreement and the Novation Agreement;

 

(ii)authorising a specified person or persons to execute this Agreement and the Novation Agreement; and

 

(iii)authorising a specified person or persons, on its behalf, to sign and/or despatch all documents and notices to be signed and/or despatched by it under or in connection with this Agreement and the Novation Agreement.

 

(c)the original of any power of attorney under which this Agreement and the Novation Agreement is executed on behalf of the Borrower.

 

2.Intermediate Charterer [Subject to confirmation by Norton Rose Fulbright Paris]

 

(a)A copy of the current consolidated articles of association of the Intermediate Charterer;

 

(b)A copy of the minutes of the board of directors of the Intermediate Charterer approving the execution of the Novation Agreement by a director, authorised signatory or attorney (or any other applicable signing authorities) of the Intermediate Charterer as required in order to issue the legal opinion set out in 6 (d) below.

 

3.Charterer [Subject to confirmation by Norton Rose Fulbright London]

 

(a)a Copy of the constitutional and incorporation documents of the Charterer.

 

(b)a Copy of a resolutions of the board of directions of the Charterer:

 

(i)approving the terms of, and the transactions contemplated by the Novation Agreement resolving that it execute the Novation Agreement;

 

(ii)authorising a specified person or persons to execute the Novation Agreement; and

 

(iii)authorising a specified person or persons, on its behalf, to sign and/or despatch all documents and notices to be signed and/or despatched by it under or in connection with the Novation Agreement.

 

 6 

 

(iv)the original of any power of attorney under which and the Novation Agreement is executed on behalf of the Charter.

 

4.Finance Documents

 

Duly executed originals of:

 

(a)this Agreement;

 

(b)the replacement Charter Assignment;

 

(c)the replacement Consent and Agreement.

 

5.Underlying Documents

 

Evidence satisfactory to the Agent (acting reasonably) that the Novation Agreement (and the Replacement Underlying Documents) shall become effective upon the occurrence of the Effective Date (together with a certified copy of the Novation Agreement) together with certified copies of:

 

(a)the Charter Ownership Undertaking;

 

(b)the Comfort Letter

 

(c)the Information Sharing Letter; and

 

(d)the Charter

 

6.Legal opinions

 

(a)An English legal opinion from Ince, addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders on the Finance Documents.

 

(b)An English legal opinion from Norton Rose Fulbright London addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(c)A Cayman Islands legal opinion from Maples & Calder, addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(d)A French legal opinion from Norton Rose Fulbright Paris addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(e)A Swiss legal opinion from Lenz & Staehelin addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(f)Such other legal opinions as the Agent may reasonably require in relation to any other Finance Document and/or the jurisdiction in which the Ship will be located under a sub-charter requiring the Ship to be in FSRU mode.

 

7.Other documents and evidence

 

A copy of any other Authorisation or other document, opinion or assurance which the Agent considers to be necessary (if it has notified the Borrower accordingly) in connection with the entry into and performance of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or for the validity and enforceability of this Agreement.

 

 7 

 

SIGNATURES

 

THE BORROWER    
       
SRV JOINT GAS LTD.    
       
By: /s/ Parit Patani    
  Parit Patani    
  Attorney-in-Fact    
       
Address: c/o Höegh LNG AS    
  Drammensveien 134    
  PO Box 4, Skoyen    
  N-0212 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 9755 7401    
       
THE AGENT (FOR THE FINANCE PARTIES)    
       
DNB BANK ASA    
       
By: /s/ Marius Johannesen /s/ Dag Iversen  
  Marius Johannesen Dag Iversen  
Advisor Advisor  
       
Address: Dronning Eufemias gate 30,    
   M15, 0191 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 22 48 28 94    
       
THE SECURITY TRUSTEE    
       
DNB BANK ASA    
       
By: /s/ Marius Johannesen /s/ Dag Iversen  
  Marius Johannesen Dag Iversen  
Advisor Advisor  
       
Address: Dronning Eufemias gate 30,    
   M15, 0191 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 22 48 28 94    

  

 8 

 

 

 

Exhibit 4.38.1

 

Dated 20 December 2019

 

Between

 

SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD.

as Borrower

 

and

 

DNB BANK ASA

(formerly known as DnB NOR BANK ASA)

as Security Trustee and as Agent for the Finance Parties

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO A USD300,000,000

TERM FACILITY AGREEMENT DATED 20 DECEMBER 2007

(AS AMENDED ON 25 MARCH 2010, 26 AUGUST 2010

AND 29 JUNE 2012)

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Ince

Aldgate Tower

2 Leman Street

London E1 8QN

 

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7481 0010

Fax: +44 (0) 20 7481 4968

 

 1 

 

THIS AGREEMENT is dated 20 December 2019 and made between:

 

(1)SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD. as borrower (the "Borrower");

 

(2)DNB BANK ASA (formerly known as DnB NOR Bank ASA) as security trustee (the "Security Trustee"); and

 

(3)DNB BANK ASA (formerly known as DnB NOR Bank ASA) as agent for the Finance Parties (the "Agent").

 

IT IS AGREED as follows:

 

1DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

 

1.1Definitions

 

In this Agreement:

 

"Amended Facility Agreement" means the Original Facility Agreement, as amended by this Agreement.

 

"Charter" means the time charterparty of the Ship dated 20 March 2007, originally entered into between the Borrower and the Original Charterer, as novated by a first novation agreement dated 25 March 2010 entered into between the Borrower, the Original Charterer and Global LNG SAS (formerly known as Global LNG Supply SA) as replacement charterer (the “Intermediate Charterer”) and as amended by the First Charter Amendment, the Second Charter Amendment, a third amendment dated 23 April 2014, the Fourth Charter Amendment and to be further amended by a second novation agreement dated December 2019 entered into between the Borrower, the Intermediate Charterer and the Charterer (the “Novation Agreement”).

 

Charterer” means Total Gas and Power Limited, a company incorporated in England with company number 02172239 and having its registered office at 13th Floor, 10 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5BF and trading through its Geneva Branch office Total Gas and Power Limited, London, Meyrin – Geneva Branch at Route de l’Aeroport 10, 1215, Geneva, Switzerland;

 

“Charter Assignment” means the assignment of the rights of the Borrower under the Charter to be executed by the Borrower and the Security Trustee in agreed form replacing the charter assignment for the Ship dated 25 March 2010 (the “Existing Charter Assignment”).

 

“Charter Ownership Undertaking” means the undertaking from the Project Sponsor as defined in Clause 3.3(a) to the Borrower dated December 2019 replacing the charter ownership undertaking dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Charter Ownership Undertaking”);

 

“Comfort Letter” means the letter dated December 2019 from the Project Sponsor to the Borrower replacing the comfort letter dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Comfort Letter”);

 

"Effective Date" means the date on which the Agent confirms to the Borrower that it has received each of the documents listed in Schedule 1 (Conditions Precedent) in a form and substance satisfactory to the Agent.

 

 2 

 

“Existing Consent and Agreement” means the Consent and Agreement dated 25 March 2010 between the Borrower, the Intermediate Charterer and the Security Trustee;

 

“Information Sharing Letter” means the letter from the Project Sponsor dated December 2019 replacing the information sharing letter dated 13 July 2018 (the “Existing Information Sharing Letter”);

 

"Original Facility Agreement" means the Facility Agreement dated 20 December 2007 as amended on 25 March 2010, 26 August 2010 and 29 June 2012 between the Borrower, the Agent and the other Finance Parties; and

 

“Consent and Agreement” means the Consent and Agreement to be made between the Borrower, the Charterer and the Security Trustee, in the form prescribed in the Charter (but amended in accordance with the Novation Agreement) replacing the Existing Consent and Agreement.

 

“Replacement Security Documents” means:

 

(a)the Charter Assignment; and

 

(b)the Consent and Agreement.

 

Replacement Underlying Documentsmeans:

 

(a)the Charter Ownership Undertaking;

 

(b)the Comfort Letter;

 

(c)the Information Sharing Letter; and

 

(d)the Charter.

 

1.2Incorporation of defined terms

 

(a)Unless a contrary indication appears, a term used in the Original Facility Agreement has the same meaning in this Agreement.

 

(b)The principles of construction set out in the Original Facility Agreement shall have effect as if set out in this Agreement.

 

1.3Clauses

 

(a)In this Agreement any reference to a "Clause" or a "Schedule" is, unless the context otherwise requires, a reference to a Clause or a Schedule of this Agreement.

 

(b)Clause and Schedule headings are for ease of reference only.

 

1.4Third Party Rights

 

A person who is not a party to this Agreement has no right under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce or to enjoy the benefit of any term of this Agreement.

 

 3 

 

1.5Designation

 

In accordance with the Original Facility Agreement, the Agent and the Borrower designate this Agreement as a Finance Document.

 

2CONSENTS

 

With effect from the Effective Date, the Agent (acting with the consent and authorisation of the Majority Lenders) gives its consent to the amendments to the Charter as contained in the Novation Agreement (as required under Clause 23.12 of the Original Facility Agreement and Clause 4.2 of the Charter Assignment).

 

3AMENDMENTS

 

3.1With effect from the Effective Date, Clause 1.1 of the Original Facility Agreement shall be amended as follows:

 

(a)by replacing the definition of “Charter” and “Charterer” in the Original Facility Agreement with the definition of such term in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement;

 

(b)by replacing the definitions of “Charter Ownership Undertaking”, “Comfort Letter and “Information Sharing Letter” in the Original Facility Agreement with the definitions of such terms in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement;

 

3.2With effect from the Effective Date, by construing references to the Charter Assignment and the Consent and Agreement to the Replacement Security Documents as defined in Clause 1.1 of this Agreement.

 

3.3With effect from 13 July 2018 (being the date on which the ownership of the Intermediate Charterer was transferred from GDF Suez S.A. to Elf Acquitaine S.A.S. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Total S.A.):

 

(a)The definition of Project Sponsor in Clause 1.1 of the Original Facility Agreement is replaced with the following:

 

“Project Sponsor” means TOTAL S.A., a société anonyme incorporated under the laws of France, having its registered office at 2 place Jean Millier – La Défénse 6-92400 Courbevoie France.

 

3.4Each of the other Finance Documents shall be amended so that any reference therein to “the Facility Agreement” shall be construed as a reference to the Amended Facility Agreement.

 

4CONTINUITY AND FURTHER ASSURANCE

 

4.1Continuing obligations

 

The provisions of the Original Facility Agreement and the other Finance Documents shall, save as amended by this Agreement, continue in full force and effect.

 

4.2Further assurance

 

The Borrower shall, at the request of the Agent and at its own expense, do all such acts and things necessary or desirable to give effect to the amendments effected or to be effected pursuant to this Agreement.

 

 4 

 

5FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES

 

5.1Transaction expenses

 

The Borrower shall promptly on demand pay the Agent the amount of all costs and expenses (including legal fees) reasonably incurred in connection with the registration, preparation, printing and execution of this Agreement and any other documents referred to in this Agreement.

 

5.2Enforcement Costs

 

The Borrower shall, within three Business Days of demand, pay to each Finance Party the amount of all costs and expenses (including legal fees) incurred by that Finance Party in connection with the enforcement, or the preservation, of any rights under this Agreement.

 

6MISCELLANEOUS

 

6.1Incorporation of terms

 

The provisions of Clause 32 (Notices), Clause 34 (Partial Invalidity), Clause 35 (Remedies, Waivers and Conflicts) and Clause 39 (Enforcement) of the Original Facility Agreement shall be incorporated into this Agreement as if set out in full in this Agreement and as if references in these clauses to "this Agreement" are references to this Agreement.

 

6.2Counterparts

 

This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and this has the same effect as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of this Agreement.

 

7GOVERNING LAW

 

This Agreement and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it shall be governed by English law.

 

This Agreement has been entered into on the date stated at the beginning of this Agreement.

 

 5 

 

SCHEDULE 1

 

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

 

1.Borrower

 

(a)A Certified Copy of the constitutional and incorporation documents of the Borrower.

 

(b)A Certified Copy of a resolution of the board of directors of the Borrower:

 

(i)approving the terms of, and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and the Novation Agreement resolving that it execute this Agreement and the Novation Agreement;

 

(ii)authorising a specified person or persons to execute this Agreement and the Novation Agreement; and

 

(iii)authorising a specified person or persons, on its behalf, to sign and/or despatch all documents and notices to be signed and/or despatched by it under or in connection with this Agreement and the Novation Agreement.

 

(c)the original of any power of attorney under which this Agreement and the Novation Agreement is executed on behalf of the Borrower.

 

2.Intermediate Charterer [Subject to confirmation by Norton Rose Fulbright Paris]

 

(a)A copy of the current consolidated articles of association of the Intermediate Charterer;

 

(b)A copy of the minutes of the board of directors of the Intermediate Charterer approving the execution of the Novation Agreement by a director, authorised signatory or attorney (or any other applicable signing authorities) of the Intermediate Charterer as required in order to issue the legal opinion set out in 6 (d) below.

 

3.Charterer [Subject to confirmation by Norton Rose Fulbright London]

 

(a)a Copy of the constitutional and incorporation documents of the Charterer.

 

(b)a Copy of a resolutions of the board of directions of the Charterer:

 

(i)approving the terms of, and the transactions contemplated by the Novation Agreement resolving that it execute the Novation Agreement;

 

(ii)authorising a specified person or persons to execute the Novation Agreement; and

 

(iii)authorising a specified person or persons, on its behalf, to sign and/or despatch all documents and notices to be signed and/or despatched by it under or in connection with the Novation Agreement.

 

 6 

 

(iv)the original of any power of attorney under which and the Novation Agreement is executed on behalf of the Charter.

 

4.Finance Documents

 

Duly executed originals of:

 

(a)this Agreement;

 

(b)the replacement Charter Assignment;

 

(c)the replacement Consent and Agreement.

 

5.Underlying Documents

 

Evidence satisfactory to the Agent (acting reasonably) that the Novation Agreement (and the Replacement Underlying Documents) shall become effective upon the occurrence of the Effective Date (together with a certified copy of the Novation Agreement) together with certified copies of:

 

(a)the Charter Ownership Undertaking;

 

(b)the Comfort Letter

 

(c)the Information Sharing Letter; and

 

(d)the Charter

 

6.Legal opinions

 

(a)An English legal opinion from Ince, addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders on the Finance Documents.

 

(b)An English legal opinion from Norton Rose Fulbright London addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(c)A Cayman Islands legal opinion from Maples & Calder, addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(d)A French legal opinion from Norton Rose Fulbright Paris addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(e)A Swiss legal opinion from Lenz & Staehelin addressed to the Arranger, the Agent and the Original Lenders.

 

(f)Such other legal opinions as the Agent may reasonably require in relation to any other Finance Document and/or the jurisdiction in which the Ship will be located under a sub-charter requiring the Ship to be in FSRU mode.

 

7.Other documents and evidence

 

A copy of any other Authorisation or other document, opinion or assurance which the Agent considers to be necessary (if it has notified the Borrower accordingly) in connection with the entry into and performance of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or for the validity and enforceability of this Agreement.

 

 7 

 

SIGNATURES

 

THE BORROWER    
       
SRV JOINT GAS TWO LTD.    
       
By: /s/ Parit Patani    
  Parit Patani    
  Attorney-in-Fact    
       
Address: c/o Höegh LNG AS    
  Drammensveien 134    
  PO Box 4, Skoyen    
  N-0212 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 9755 7401    
       
THE AGENT (FOR THE FINANCE PARTIES)    
       
DNB BANK ASA    
       
By: /s/ Marius Johannesen /s/ Dag Iversen  
  Marius Johannesen Dag Iversen  
  Advisor Advisor  
       
Address: Dronning Eufemias gate 30,    
  M15, 0191 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 22 48 28 94    
       
THE SECURITY TRUSTEE    
       
DNB BANK ASA    
       
By: /s/ Marius Johannesen /s/ Dag Iversen  
  Marius Johannesen Dag Iversen  
  Advisor Advisor  
       
Address: Dronning Eufemias gate 30,    
  M15, 0191 Oslo, Norway    
       
Fax: +47 22 48 28 94    

 

 8 

 

 

 

Exhibit 8.1

 

Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Subsidiary Ownership Interest Jurisdiction of Formation
Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC 100% Republic of the Marshall Islands
SRV Joint Gas Ltd. 50% Cayman Islands
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. 50% Cayman Islands
Höegh LNG Lampung Pte Ltd. 100% Singapore
Höegh LNG Services Ltd. 100% United Kingdom
PT Hoegh LNG Lampung 49% Indonesia
Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. 1 100% Cayman Islands
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited 100% Cyprus
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch 100% Egypt
Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. 100% Cayman Islands
Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. 100% Cayman Islands
Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. 100% Colombia

 

 

1 On February 4, 2020, a Certificate of Dissolution was received from Cayman Islands, certifying that Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. will be dissolved on May 4, 2020.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 12.1

 

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(A) or Rule 15d-14(A)

 

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

 

I, Steffen Føreid, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “registrant”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:   April 3, 2020 HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP
     
  By: /s/ Steffen Føreid
  Name: Steffen Føreid
  Title: Principal Executive Officer
    and Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 13.1

 

Certification Pursuant to

 

18 U.S.C. 1350

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Höegh LNG Partners LP, a Marshall Islands limited partnership (the “Partnership”), certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 of the Partnership (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

Date:  April 3, 2020   HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP
     
  By: /s/ Steffen Føreid
  Name: Steffen Føreid
  Title: Principal Executive Officer
    and Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 15.1

 

Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

 

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Total revenue  $       $ 
EXPENSES               
Administrative expenses   (6,473)   (5,822)   (8,608)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries   60,315    68,359    66,521 
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures   6,078    17,938    5,139 
Interest income   11,205    93    83 
Interest expense   (18,242)   (2,938)   (3,934)
Other items, net   (142)   (8)   (11)
Net income  $52,741    77,622   $59,190 
Share of subsidiaries unrealized losses on cash flow hedges   (12,217)   (2,290)   3,335 
Share of subsidiaries income tax benefit   (389)   (299)   (347)
Comprehensive income  $40,135    75,033   $62,178 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

 

 

 

 

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

 

   As of
December 31,
 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018 
Cash  $6,934   $7,006 
Current portion of long-term loans to subsidiaries   25,597     
Promissory note from subsidiaries   123,248    123,248 
Prepaid expenses and other receivables   224    14 
Total current assets   156,003    130,268 
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures   3,270     
Loans to subsidiaries   260,636     
Investments in subsidiaries   449,570    433,088 
Total long-term assets   713,476    433,088 
Total assets  $869,479   $563,356 
LIABILITIES AND PARTNER'S CAPITAL          
Current portion of long-term debt  $25,597   $ 
Trade payables   52    56 
Amounts due to owners and affiliates   398    417 
Derivative instruments   1,821     
Accrued liabilities and other payables   3,155    346 
Total current liabilities   31,023    819 
Accumulated losses of joint ventures       2,808 
Long-term debt   318,650     
Loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates   8,792    39,292 
Derivative instruments   9,504     
Total long-term liabilities   336,946    42,100 
Total liabilities   367,969    42,919 
Total partners' capital   501,510    520,437 
Total liabilities and partners' capital  $869,479   $563,356 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

 

 

 

 

Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant 

 

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW

 

   Year ended December 31, 
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)  2019   2018   2017 
Net cash provided by operating activities  $33,130    42,401   $6,862 
                
INVESTING ACTIVITIES               
Long-term loan due from subsidiaries   (286,233)        
Expenditure for purchase of Höegh Grace entities           (137,475)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash designated for purchase of the Höegh Grace entities           91,768 
Proceeds from investment in subsidiaries           12,202 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   (286,233)       (33,505)
                
FINANCING ACTIVITIES               
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A Preferred Units   13,065    38,659    110,924 
Net proceeds from issuance of common units   1,029    4,563     
Proceeds from long-term debt   368,300         
Proceeds from loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates   3,500    5,400    25,730 
Repayment of long-term debt   (19,198)        
Repayment of debt issuance cost   (5,797)        
Repayment of amounts due to owners and affiliates   (34,000)   (17,500)   (58,705)
Proceeds from indemnifications received from Höegh LNG       1,701    2,075 
Repayment of indemnifications received from Höegh LNG   (64)   (2,353)   (1,534)
Cash distributions to limited partners   (73,804)   (72,497)   (57,037)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities   253,031    (42,027)   21,453 
                
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash   (72)   374    (5,190)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period   7,006    6,632    11,822 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period  $6,934    7,006   $6,632 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

 

 

 

 

1.Basis of presentation

 

Höegh LNG Partners LP – the Parent company is a Marshall Islands limited partnership formed on April 28, 2014.

 

In the parent-only financial statements, the investment in subsidiaries and investment in joint ventures are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and accumulated earnings in joint ventures since the date of acquisition and the closing of the initial public offering of Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on August 12, 2014. The Partnership’s share of net income of its unconsolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures is included in the condensed income statement using the equity method. The Parent company’s financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in the Partnership’s Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

2.Dividends

 

A cash dividend of $42.4 million, $51.7 million and $17.7 million was paid to the Parent company from its consolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 15.2

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-211840) pertaining to the Höegh LNG Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan and Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. Phantom Unit Awards and the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-234011) of Höegh LNG Partners LP and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated April 3, 2020, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Höegh LNG Partners LP and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Höegh LNG Partners LP, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young AS

 

Oslo, Norway

 

April 3, 2020

 

 

 

v3.20.1
Common, subordinated and preferred units
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Common, subordinated and preferred units  
Common, subordinated and preferred units

21.   Common, subordinated and preferred units

The following table shows the movements in the number of common units, subordinated units and preferred units during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

 

 

8.75%

 

 

Common

 

Units

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

Units

 

Höegh

 

Subordinated

 

Preferred

(in units)

    

Public

    

LNG

    

Units

    

Units

December 31, 2016

 

17,639,039

 

2,116,060

 

13,156,060

 

 —

May 22, 2017; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

9,805

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

October 5, 2017; Series A preferred units offering

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,600,000

December 31, 2017

 

17,648,844

 

2,116,060

 

13,156,060

 

4,600,000

June 6, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

8,840

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

July 5, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

2,210

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Units issued to staff at Höegh LNG during 2018

 

14,622

 

(14,622)

 

 —

 

 —

Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2018

 

17,079

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

ATM program (from January 26, 2018 to December 31, 2018)

 

253,106

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,529,070

December 31, 2018

 

17,944,701

 

2,101,438

 

13,156,060

 

6,129,070

June 4, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

8,944

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

July 16, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

2,236

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

August 16, 2019; Subordinated units converted to common units

 

 —

 

13,156,060

 

(13,156,060)

 

 —

Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2019

 

19,745

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

ATM program (from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019)

 

53,160

 

 —

 

 —

 

496,520

December 31, 2019

 

18,028,786

 

15,257,498

 

 —

 

6,625,590

 

The subordination period, as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Höegh LNG Partners LP, for the subordinated units ended on August 16, 2019. All of the subordinated units, which were owned by Höegh LNG, converted to common units on a one-for-one basis. As of December 31, 2019, Höegh LNG owned 15,257,498 common units. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017 Höegh LNG owned 2,101,438 common units and 13,156,060 subordinated units.

Refer to note 22 for information on distributions to common and subordinated unitholders.

The Series A preferred units represent perpetual equity interests in the Partnership and, unlike the Partnership’s debt, do not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date. The Series A preferred units rank senior to the Partnership’s common units as to the payment of distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up but junior to all the Partnership’s debt and other liabilities. The Series A preferred units have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per unit. At any time on or after October 5, 2022, the Partnership may redeem, in whole or in part, the Series A preferred units at a redemption price of $25.00 per unit plus an amount equal to all accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon to the date of redemption. The distribution rate on the Series A preferred units is 8.75% per annum of the $25.00 per unit value (equivalent to $2.1875 per annum per unit). The distributions are cumulative and recorded when declared. However, since the Series A preferred units rank senior to the Partnership’s common units, the portion of net income, equivalent to the Series A preferred units’ paid and undeclared distributions for that period, is reflected as Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income on the consolidated statement of income. Distributions are payable quarterly, when, and if declared by the Partnership’s board of directors out of legally available funds for such purpose. Holders of the Series A preferred units generally have no voting rights. However, if and whenever distributions payable on the Series A preferred units are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, holders of Series A Preferred

Units will be entitled to replace one of the members of the Partnership’s board of directors appointed by the general partner with a person nominated by such holders.

v3.20.1
Long-term debt
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Long-term debt

13.   Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

    

2018

Lampung facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Export credit tranche

 

$

94,210

 

$

109,096

FSRU tranche

 

 

22,812

 

 

26,988

Gallant facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

111,264

Export credit tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

29,333

Grace facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

135,813

Export credit tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

27,750

$385 million facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

249,635

 

 

 —

Export credit tranche

 

 

51,167

 

 

 —

Revolving credit tranche

 

 

48,300

 

 

 —

Outstanding principal

 

 

466,124

 

 

440,244

Lampung facility unamortized debt issuance cost

 

 

(4,309)

 

 

(5,809)

Gallant facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed

 

 

 —

 

 

215

Grace facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed

 

 

 —

 

 

895

$385 million facility unamortized debt issuance costs

 

 

(4,854)

 

 

 —

Total debt

 

 

456,961

 

 

435,545

Less: Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

(44,660)

 

 

(45,458)

Long-term debt

 

$

412,301

 

$

390,087

 

Lampung facility

In September 2013, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (the “Borrower”) entered into a secured $299 million term loan facility (the “Lampung facility”) with a syndicate of banks and an export credit agency for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring. Höegh LNG is the guarantor for the Lampung facility. The facility was drawn in installments as construction was completed. The term loan facility includes two commercial tranches, the FSRU tranche and the Mooring tranche, and the export credit tranche. The interest rates vary by tranche. The full principal amount on the Mooring tranche and accrued interest was repaid in 2014.

The FSRU tranche has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.4%.  The interest rate for the export credit tranche is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.3%. The FSRU tranche is repayable quarterly over 7 years with a final balloon payment of $16.5 million. The export credit tranche is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years assuming the balloon payment of the FSRU tranche is refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the outstanding balance upon maturity of the FSRU tranche. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 6.2% and 5.9% respectively.

The primary financial covenants under the Lampung facility are as follows:

·

Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the preceding nine-month period tested on each quarterly repayment date;

·

Guarantor’s book equity must be greater than the higher of (i) $200 million and (ii) 25% of total assets; and

·

Guarantor’s free liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents or available draws on credit facilities) must be greater than $20 million.

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Borrower and the guarantor were in compliance with the financial covenants.

Höegh LNG, as guarantor, has issued the following guarantees related to the Lampung facility that remain in effect as of December 31, 2019: (a) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for the repayment of the balloon repayment installment of the FSRU tranche callable only at final maturity of the FSRU tranche; (b) an unconditional and irrevocable on-demand guarantee for all amounts due in respect of the export credit agent in the event that the export credit agent exercises its prepayment right for the export credit tranche if the FSRU tranche is not refinanced; and (c) undertaking that, if the time charter is terminated for an event of vessel force majeure, that under certain conditions, a guarantee will be provided for the outstanding debt, less insurance proceeds for vessel force majeure. In addition, all project agreements and guarantees are assigned to the bank syndicate and the export credit agent, all cash accounts and the shares in PT Hoegh LNG Lampung and Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. are pledged in favor of the bank syndicate and the export credit agent.

The Lampung facility requires cash reserves that are held for specifically designated uses, including working capital, operations and maintenance and debt service reserves. Distributions are subject to “waterfall” provisions that allocate revenues to specified priorities of use (such as operating expenses, scheduled debt service, targeted debt service reserves and any other reserves) with the remaining cash being distributable only on certain dates and subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including meeting a 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio, no default or event of default then continuing or resulting from such distribution and the guarantor not being in breach of the financial covenants applicable to it. The Lampung facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower to change its business, sell or grant liens on its property including the PGN FSRU Lampung, incur additional indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness, make investments or acquisitions, enter into intercompany transactions and make distributions.

Gallant/Grace facility

The Gallant/Grace facility included two borrowers, the Partnership’s subsidiaries owning the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. The Gallant/Grace facility included two commercial tranches and the export credit tranche related to the Höegh Gallant (the “Gallant facility”) and a commercial tranche and the export credit tranche related to the Höegh Grace (the “Grace facility”). All of the tranches under the Gallant/Grace facility were cross-defaulted, cross-collateralized and cross-guaranteed. The obligations of the Borrowers were joint and several. The interest rates varied by tranche. Höegh LNG, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. and the Partnership were guarantors for the facility.

On January 31, 2019, the outstanding balance and the accrued interest of $303.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility was repaid from the proceeds of the $385 million facility. The unamortized balance of the fair value of debt assumed, or premium, was recorded as a gain when the debt was extinguished. Refer to note 6. The interest rate swaps related to the Gallant/Grace facility were terminated on the same date. Refer to note 17.

$385 million facility

On January 29, 2019, the Partnership entered a loan agreement with a syndicate of banks to refinance the outstanding balances of the Gallant/Grace facility. Höegh LNG Partners LP is the borrower (the “Borrower”) for the senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility (the “$385 million facility”). The aggregate borrowing capacity is $320 million on the senior secured term loan and $63 million on the revolving credit tranche. Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, which owns the Höegh Gallant, and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., the owner of the Höegh Grace (collectively, the "Vessel Owners"), Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S., and Höegh LNG Egypt LLC, a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, are guarantors for the facility (collectively, the "guarantors"). The facility is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, an assignment of the Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited’s, Höegh LNG Egypt LLC’s, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd.’s, Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.’s rights under their respective time charters and earnings and a pledge of the Borrower’s and Guarantor’s cash accounts. The Partnership and its subsidiaries have provided a pledge of shares in Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S., and Höegh LNG has provided a pledge of its shares in Höegh LNG Egypt LLC as security for the facility.

The senior secured term loan related to the $385 million facility includes a commercial tranche and the export credit tranche. Each tranche is divided into two term loans for each of the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

On January 31, 2019, the Partnership drew $320 million under the commercial and the export credit tranches on the $385 million facility to settle $303.2 million and $1.6 million of the outstanding balance and accrued interest, respectively, on the Gallant/Grace facility and used proceeds of $5.5 million to pay arrangement fees due under the $385 million facility. The remaining proceeds of $9.6 million were used for general partnership purposes. On August 12, 2019, the Partnership drew $48.3 million under the revolving credit tranche of the $385 million facility, of which $34.0 million was used to repay part of the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility due to Höegh LNG.

The commercial tranche and the revolving credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.30%. The commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the revolving credit tranche is approximately 1.6%. The interest rate for the export credit tranche related to the $385 million facility have fixed interest rates and guarantee commissions of 3.98% and 3.88% on the term loans related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace, respectively. The commercial tranche is repayable quarterly with a final balloon payment of $136.1 million due in January 2026. The term loans for export credit tranche related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace are repayable in quarterly installments with the final payments in October 2026 and April 2028, respectively, assuming the balloon payments of the commercial tranches are refinanced. If not, the export credit agent can exercise a prepayment right for repayment of the total outstanding balance on both the terms loans of the export credit tranche of $9.5 million upon maturity of the commercial tranche. Any outstanding balance on the revolving credit facility is due in full in January 2026. The weighted average interest rate, excluding the impact of the associated interest rate swaps, for the year ended December 31, 2019 was 4.7%.

The primary financial covenants under the $385 million facility are as follows:

·

The Partnership must maintain

o

Consolidated book equity (excluding hedge reserves and mark to market value of derivatives) equal to the greater of

·

25% of total assets, and

·

$150 million

o

Consolidated working capital (current assets, excluding intercompany receivables and marked-to-market value of any financial derivative, less current liabilities, excluding intercompany payables, marked-to-market value of any financial derivative and the current portion of long-term debt) shall at all time be greater than zero

o

Minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents and available draws under a bank credit facility for a term of more than 12 months) equal to the greater of

·

$15 million, and

·

$2.5 million multiplied by the number of vessels owned or leased by the Partnership (prorated for partial ownership), subject to a cap of $20 million

o

A ratio of combined EBITDA for the Vessel Owners to debt service (principal repayments, guarantee commission, commitment fees and interest expense) for the preceding twelve months of a minimum of 115%

As of December 31, 2019, the Borrower and the Vessel Owners were in compliance with the financial covenants.

In addition, a security maintenance ratio based on the aggregate market value of the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace and any additional security must be at least 125% of the aggregate outstanding loan balance.

If the security maintenance ratio is not maintained, the relevant Borrower has 30 days to provide more security or to repay part of the loan to be in compliance with the ratio no later than 30 days after notice from the lenders.

Under the $385 million facility, cash accounts are freely available for the use of the Borrower and the guarantors, unless there is an event of default. Events of default include, among other things, change of control of the Partnership due to the failure of Höegh LNG to own at least 25% of the Partnership’s common units. Cash can be distributed as dividends or to service loans of owners and affiliates provided that after the distribution the Borrower and the guarantors would remain in compliance with the financial covenants. The $385 million facility limits, among other things, the ability of the Borrower and the guarantors to change their business, grant liens on the Höegh Gallant or the Höegh Grace, incur additional indebtedness that is not at pari passu with the $385 million facility, enter into intercompany debt that is not subordinated to the $385 million facility and for the Vessel Owners to make investments or acquisitions.

The principal on long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2019 was repayable as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Total

2020

 

$

44,660

2021

 

 

123,557

2022

 

 

25,597

2023

 

 

25,597

2024

 

 

25,597

2025 and thereafter

 

 

221,116

Total

 

$

466,124

 

The table includes the maturity of the FSRU tranche of the Lampung facility in 2021 and assumes the exercise of the prepayment right for the export credit tranche of the Lampung facility in the same period.

v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Risk management and concentrations of risk  
Risk management and concentrations of risk

17.   Risk management and concentrations of risk

Derivative instruments can be used in accordance with the overall risk management policy.

Interest rate risk, derivative instruments and cash flow hedges

Cash flow hedging strategy

The Partnership is exposed to fluctuations in cash flows from floating interest rate exposure on its long-term debt used principally to finance its vessels. Interest rate swaps are used for the management of the floating interest rate risk exposure. The interest rate swaps have the effect of converting a portion of the outstanding debt from a floating to a fixed rate over the life of the interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps exchange a receipt of floating interest for a payment of fixed interest which reduce the exposure to interest rate variability on the Partnership’s outstanding floating-rate debt over the life of the interest rate swaps. As of December 31, 2019, there are interest rate swap agreements related to the Lampung facility (“Lampung interest rate swaps”) and the commercial tranche of the $385 million facility (“$385 million interest rate swaps”) floating rate debt that are designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. As of December 31, 2018, there were interest rate swap agreements related to the Lampung and $385 million facilities floating rate debt that were designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. In addition, there were interest rate swap agreements related to the Gallant and Grace facilities floating rate debt. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 for these interest rate swaps as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Gallant and Grace facilities which was planned to occur in January 2019. As of January 31, 2019, the commercial and export credit tranches of the $385 million facility were drawn, and the Gallant and Grace facilities were repaid. The interest rate swaps related to the Gallant and Grace facilities were also terminated on the same date. As of December 31, 2019, the following interest rate swap agreements were outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fair

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

value

 

 

 

Fixed

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

carrying

 

 

 

interest

 

 

 

rate

 

Notional

 

amount

 

  

 

rate

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

index

    

amount

    

liability

    

Term

    

(1)

 

LIBOR-based debt

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Lampung interest rate swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

117,022

 

$

(3,610)

 

Sep 2026

 

2.800

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(3,241)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.941

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,909)

 

Oct 2025

 

2.838

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,699)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.735

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,476)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.650

%


1)

Excludes the margins paid on the floating-rate debt.

2)

All interest rate swaps are U.S. dollar denominated and the notional amount reduces quarterly from the effective date of the interest rate swaps.

The Borrower under the Lampung facility entered five forward starting swap agreements with identical terms for a total notional amount of $237.1 million with an effective date of March 17, 2014. The swaps amortize over 12 years to match the amortization profile of the Lampung facility and subsequent financing and exchange 3‑month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments at 2.8%. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments on the Lampung facility and subsequent financing. As of December 29, 2014, a prepayment of $7.9 million on the Lampung facility occurred which resulted in an amendment of the original interest rate swaps and the hedge was de-designated for accounting purposes. The other terms of the amended interest rate swaps did not change but the nominal amount of the interest rate swaps was reduced to match the outstanding debt. The amended interest rate swaps were re-designated as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes.

As of October 1, 2015, the Partnership acquired the Höegh Gallant entities which had outstanding debt under the Gallant facility and three associated interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $146.3 million. The swaps amortized to match the debt amortization of the Gallant facility until the scheduled repayment date in September 2019. The swaps exchanged 3 month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments ranging from 1.9105% to 1.9145%. As of October 1, 2015, the interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $146.3 million of the commercial tranches of the Gallant facility. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Gallant facility which was planned to occur in January 2019.

Effective as of January 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the Höegh Grace entities which had outstanding debt under the Grace facility and three associated interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $164.0 million. The swaps amortized to match the debt amortization of the Grace facility until the scheduled repayment date in June 2020. The swaps exchanged 3 month USD LIBOR variable interest payments for fixed rate payments ranging from 2.305% to 2.315%. As of January 1, 2017, the interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $164.0 million of the commercial tranches of the Grace facility. Hedge accounting was discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2018 as a result of firm commitment for the refinancing of the Grace facility which was planned to occur in January 2019.

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership had entered into forward starting interest rate swaps with a nominal amount of $130.0 million to hedge part of the interest rate risk on the floating element of the interest rate for the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility. The Partnership makes fixed payments of 2.941% and 2.838%, based on a nominal amount of $65.0 million for each, in exchange for floating payments. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $130.0 million of the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility which was expected to be drawn and was drawn on January 31, 2019. In February 2019, the Partnership entered into interest rate swaps related to the $385 million facility with a nominal amount of $127.7 million for which the Partnership makes fixed payments of 2.650% and 2.735% based on nominal amount of $63.8 million for each. The interest rate swaps were designated for accounting purposes as cash flow hedges of the variable interest payments for $127.7 million of the commercial tranches of the $385 million facility. The export credit tranches have a fixed interest rate and, therefore, no variability in cash flows as a result of changes in interest rates.

The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments, segregated by type of contract, on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

Long-term

 

Current

 

Long-term

 

 

assets:

 

assets:

 

liabilities:

 

liabilities:

 

 

derivative

 

derivative

 

derivative

 

derivative

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

instruments

    

instruments

    

instruments

    

instruments

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest rate swaps

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(2,907)

 

$

(12,028)

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest rate swaps

 

$

1,199

 

$

 —

 

$

(259)

 

$

(2,438)

 

The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Interest expense

    

benefit

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps in cash flow hedging relationships:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness

 

$

(956)

 

$

 —

Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness

 

 

966

 

 

 —

Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach

 

 

(987)

 

 

389

Settlement of cash flow hedge

 

 

199

 

 

 —

Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments

 

$

(778)

 

$

389

 

The settlement of cash flow hedge related to the interest rate swaps for Gallant/Grace facility. The Gallant/Grace interest rate swaps were terminated when the facility was extinguished on January 31, 2019. Due to the termination, the counterparties of the Gallant/Grace interest rate swaps paid settlement amounts resulting in a gain on the settlement of the cash flow hedge.

The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in total gains (losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2018

    

2017

Interest rate swaps:

 

  

 

 

  

 

Ineffective portion of cash flow hedge

 

$

(990)

 

$

(2)

Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness

 

 

2,969

 

 

3,320

Reclassification discontinued hedge from OCI

 

 

3,557

 

 

 —

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

(855)

 

 

(855)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 

 

4,681

 

 

2,463

Realized gains (losses)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments

 

$

4,681

 

$

2,463

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the reclassification to earnings from OCI for the discontinued cash flow hedges relates to Gallant/Grace facility which was to be refinanced on January 31, 2019. The accumulated other comprehensive income balance for the cash flow hedge is reclassified to earnings when the hedged future cash flows are no longer expected to occur.

The effect of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps and the related tax effects on other comprehensive income, changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and on earnings is as follows as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

Earnings

 

 

Before tax

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gains

 

Tax benefit

 

OCI: Net of

 

Interest

 

Tax

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

(losses)

    

(expense)

    

tax

    

expense

    

benefit

Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2018

 

$

(5,902)

 

565

 

$

(5,337)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach

 

 

(625)

 

 —

 

 

(625)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

(13,535)

 

 —

 

 

(13,535)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness

 

 

956

 

 —

 

 

956

 

 

(956)

 

 

 —

Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach

 

 

987

 

(389)

 

 

598

 

 

(987)

 

 

389

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

(12,217)

 

(389)

 

 

(12,606)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2019

 

$

(18,119)

 

176

 

$

(17,943)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Gain (loss) reclassified to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

(1,943)

 

$

389

 

The effect of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps and the related tax effects on other comprehensive income and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) is as follows as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

 

 

 

Before tax

 

Tax benefit

 

 

 

Accumulated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

gains (losses)

    

(expense)

    

Net of tax

    

OCI

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

(6,947)

 

1,211

 

(5,736)

 

$

(5,736)

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

2,480

 

 —

 

2,480

 

 

2,480

Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

855

 

(347)

 

508

 

 

508

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

3,335

 

(347)

 

2,988

 

 

2,988

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

(3,612)

 

864

 

(2,748)

 

$

(2,748)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

(3,612)

 

864

 

(2,748)

 

$

(2,748)

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

412

 

 —

 

412

 

 

412

Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

855

 

(299)

 

556

 

 

556

Reclassification of discontinued cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

(3,557)

 

 —

 

(3,557)

 

 

(3,557)

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

(2,290)

 

(299)

 

(2,589)

 

 

(2,589)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

(5,902)

 

565

 

(5,337)

 

$

(5,337)

 

As of December 31, 2019, the estimated amounts to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings during the next twelve months is $3.2 million.

Foreign exchange risk

All financing, interest expenses from financing and most of the Partnership’s revenue and expenditures for vessel improvements are denominated in U.S. dollars. Certain operating expenses can be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, no derivative instruments have been used to manage foreign exchange risk.

 

Credit risk

Credit risk is the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties related to cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and interest rate swap agreements. Further, the Partnership has future exposure for Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to the Partnership for future time charter hire under the option exercised for the Höegh Gallant and for indemnification payments related to the boil-off claim for the joint ventures. Refer to note 18. In order to minimize counterparty risk, bank relationships are established with counterparties with acceptable credit ratings at the time of the transactions. Credit risk related to receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customers’ or counterparty’s financial condition. PGN guarantees PGN LNG’s obligations under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter. The other time charters do not have parent company guarantees.

Concentrations of risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables, amounts due from affiliates and derivative contracts (interest rate swaps). The maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value at the balance sheet date. The Partnership does not have a policy of requiring collateral or security. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are placed with qualified financial institutions. Periodic evaluations are performed of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions. In addition, exposure is limited by diversifying among counterparties. There are three charterers so there is a concentration of risk related to trade receivables. Credit risk related to trade receivables is limited by performing ongoing credit evaluations of the customer’s financial condition. No allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. While the maximum exposure to loss due to credit risk is the book value of trade receivables at the balance sheet date, should the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung or the Höegh Grace terminate prematurely, or Höegh LNG prematurely terminate the Subsequent Charter for the Höegh Gallant, or the option to acquire the PGN FSRU Lampung be exercised, there could be delays in obtaining new time charters and the hire rates could be lower depending upon the prevailing market conditions.

v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - shares
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]    
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued 6,625,590 6,129,070
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding 6,625,590 6,129,070
Common units public [Member]    
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued 18,028,786 17,944,701
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding 18,028,786 17,944,701
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]    
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued 15,257,498 2,101,438
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding 15,257,498 2,101,438
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]    
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued 0 13,156,060
General Partners' Capital Account, Units Outstanding 0 13,156,060
v3.20.1
Document and Entity Information
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
shares
Document Information [Line Items]  
Document Type 20-F
Document Registration Statement false
Document Annual Report true
Document Transition Report false
Document Shell Company Report false
Amendment Flag false
Document Period End Date Dec. 31, 2019
Document Fiscal Year Focus 2019
Document Fiscal Period Focus FY
Entity Registrant Name Hoegh LNG Partners LP
Entity Central Index Key 0001603016
Current Fiscal Year End Date --12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer No
Entity Voluntary Filers No
Entity Current Reporting Status Yes
Entity Interactive Data Current Yes
Entity Filer Category Accelerated Filer
Trading Symbol HMLP
Entity Shell Company false
Entity Emerging Growth Company false
Common Stock [Member]  
Document Information [Line Items]  
Entity Common Stock, number of units outstanding 6,625,590
Preferred Stock [Member]  
Document Information [Line Items]  
Entity Common Stock, number of units outstanding 33,286,284
v3.20.1
Description of business
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Description of business  
Description of business

1.   Description of business

Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) was formed under the laws of the Marshall Islands on April 28, 2014 as an indirect 100% owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG Holdings Ltd. (“Höegh LNG”) for the purpose of acquiring Höegh LNG’s interests in Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd., PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (the owner of the PGN FSRU Lampung), SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (the owner of the Neptune), and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (the owner of the Cape Ann) in connection with the Partnership’s initial public offering of its common units (the “IPO”) in August 2014.

On August 12, 2014, the Partnership completed its IPO. Prior to the closing of the IPO, Höegh LNG contributed to the Partnership all of its equity interests and loans and promissory notes due to it and affiliates in each of the entities owning the Neptune, the Cape Ann and the PGN FSRU Lampung. The transfer of the interests was recorded at Höegh LNG’s consolidated book values. At the closing of the IPO (including the exercise by the underwriters of the option to purchase an additional 1,440,000 common units), (i) 11,040,000 common units were sold to the public for net proceeds, after deduction of offering expenses, of $203.5 million; (ii) Höegh LNG owned 2,116,060 common units and 13,156,060 subordinated units, representing approximately 58% of the limited partner interests in the Partnership, and 100% of the incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) and (iii) a wholly owned subsidiary of Höegh LNG owned the non-economic general partner interest in the Partnership.

Under the partnership agreement, the general partner has irrevocably delegated to the Partnership’s board of directors the power to oversee and direct the operations of, manage and determine the strategies and policies of the Partnership. Four of the seven board members were elected by the common unitholders at the Partnership’s first annual meeting of unitholders held on September 24, 2014. As a result, Höegh LNG, as the owner of the general partner, does not have the power to control the Partnership’s board of directors or the Partnership, and the Partnership is not considered to be under the control of Höegh LNG for United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) purposes. Therefore, the sale of a business from Höegh LNG to the Partnership is a change of control. As a result, the Partnership accounts for acquisitions of businesses under the purchase method of accounting and not as transfers of entities under common control.

On October 1, 2015, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 100% of the shares in Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd., the entity that indirectly owned the floating storage and regasification unit (“FSRU”) the Höegh Gallant (the “ Höegh Gallant entities”).  The Höegh Gallant was constructed by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (“HHI”) and was delivered to Höegh LNG in November 2014.

In December 2016, the Partnership issued and sold 6,588,389 common units in an underwritten public offering for net proceeds of $111.5 million primarily to fund the purchase price of the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., the owner of the entities that own and operate the FSRU Höegh Grace (the “Höegh Grace entities”), in January 2017. Refer to note 3.

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in Höegh Colombia Holding Ltd. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership entered an agreement with Höegh LNG, under which Höegh LNG granted to the Partnership the authority to make decisions about operations of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. from January 1, 2017 to the closing date of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership has recorded the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities in its consolidated statement of income from January 1, 2017. Refer to note 3.

On October 5, 2017, the Partnership issued 4,600,000 8.75% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred units (the “Series A preferred units”) for proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and expenses, of $110.9 million. Refer to note 20. A portion of the net proceeds was used to repay outstanding debt under the seller’s credit note related to the Höegh Gallant acquisition and outstanding debt under the revolving credit facility.

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities with a combination of cash remaining from the net proceeds from the issuance of Series A preferred units and draws on the revolving credit facility. Refer to note 3.

On January 26, 2018, the Partnership entered into sales agreement with B. Riley FBR Inc. (the “Agent”). Under the terms of the sales agreement, the Partnership could offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and Series A preferred units through the Agent, acting as agent for the Partnership (the “Prior ATM Program”).

On October 18, 2019, the Partnership entered into a sales agreement with the Agent for a new ATM program and terminated the Prior ATM Program. Under the terms of the new sales agreement, the Partnership may offer and sell up to $120 million aggregate offering amount of common units and Series A preferred units, from time to time, through the Agent, acting as an agent for the Partnership. Sales of such units may be made in negotiated transactions that are deemed to be “at the market” offerings, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange or through a market maker other than on an exchange.

The interests in SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., collectively, are referred to as the “joint ventures” and the remaining entities owned by the Partnership, as reflected in the table below are, collectively, referred to as the “subsidiaries” in these consolidated financial statements. The PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant, the Höegh Grace, the Neptune and the Cape Ann are FSRUs and, collectively, referred to in these consolidated financial statements as the vessels or the “FSRUs.” The Tower Yoke Mooring System (the “Mooring”) is an offshore installation that is used to moor the PGN FSRU Lampung to offload the gas into an offshore pipe that transports the gas to a land terminal. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, the owner of the Höegh Gallant, Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., the owner of the Höegh Grace, and the two joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., are collectively referred to as the “FSRU-owning entities.”

The Neptune and the Cape Ann operate under long-term time charters with expiration dates in 2029 and 2030, respectively, and, in each case, with an option for the charterer, Global LNG Supply SA, as novated to Total Gas & Power Ltd. in  February 2020, both subsidiaries of Total S.A. (“Total”), to extend for up to one additional period of ten years or two additional periods of five years each. The PGN FSRU Lampung, operates under a long term time charter which started in July 2014 with an expiration date in 2034, with an option for the charterer to extend for up to two additional periods of five years each, and uses the Mooring that was constructed, installed and sold to the charterer, PT PGN LNG Indonesia (“PGN LNG”), a subsidiary of PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk (“PGN”), a subsidiary of PT Pertamina, a government-controlled, Indonesian oil and gas producer, natural gas transportation and distribution company. The Höegh Gallant operates under a long term time charter which started in April 2015 with an expiration date in April 2020 with Hoegh LNG Egypt LLC (“EgyptCo”), a subsidiary of Höegh LNG. EgyptCo had a charter with the government-owned Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company (“EGAS”) until October 2018. EgyptCo has an LNG carrier time charter to a third party from October 2018 until April 2020. Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership exercised, on February 27, 2020, its right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. The Höegh Grace operates under a long term time charter which started in December 2016 with Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P. (“SPEC”). SPEC is owned 51% by Promigas S.A. ESP, a Colombian company focused on the transportation and distribution of natural gas, and 49% by private equity investors. The non-cancellable charter period of 10 years ends in December 2026. The initial term of the charter is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if SPEC waives its rights to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, the Partnership will not be able to exercise its right to terminate in year 10.

The following table lists the entities included in these consolidated financial statements and their purpose as of December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Jurisdiction of

    

  

 

 

Incorporation

 

  

Name

 

or Registration

 

Purpose

Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Marshall Islands

 

Holding Company

Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (100% owned) (4)

 

Marshall Islands

 

Holding Company

Hoegh LNG Services Ltd (100% owned)

 

United Kingdom

 

Administration Services Company

Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. (100% owned)

 

Singapore

 

Owns 49% of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung

PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (49% owned) (1)

 

Indonesia

 

Owns PGN FSRU Lampung

SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (50% owned) (2)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Neptune

SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (50% owned) (2)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Cape Ann

Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. (100% owned) (4)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Holding Company

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited (100% owned)

 

Cyprus

 

Owns Höegh Gallant

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch (100% owned)

 

Egypt

 

Branch of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited

Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. (100% owned) (3)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns 100% of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.

Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. (100% indirectly owned) (3)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Höegh Grace

Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. (100% indirectly owned) (3)

 

Colombia

 

Operating Company


(1)

PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a variable interest entity, which is controlled by Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. and is, therefore, 100% consolidated in the consolidated financial statements.

(2)

The remaining 50% interest in each joint venture is owned by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co.

(3)

The 51% of the ownership interests were acquired on January 3, 2017, and the remaining 49% of the ownership interests were acquired on December 1, 2017.

(4)

On January 31, 2019, Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. transferred its ownership in Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited to Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. On February 14, 2020, the Certificate of Dissolution was received, certifying that Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. will be dissolved on May 4, 2020.

 

v3.20.1
Segment information - Percentage of consolidated total revenues (Details) - Sales Revenue, Net [Member]
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
PT PGN LNG Indonesia [Member]      
Percentage of Revenue 33.00% 33.00% 33.00%
Hoegh LNG Egypt LLC [Member]      
Percentage of Revenue 31.00% 31.00% 31.00%
Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao [Member]      
Percentage of Revenue 36.00% 36.00% 36.00%
v3.20.1
Common, subordinated and preferred units - Movements (Details) - shares
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Common units public [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Beginning Balance 17,944,701 17,648,844 17,639,039
Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees 8,944 8,840 9,805
ATM program 53,160 253,106  
Ending Balance 18,028,786 17,944,701 17,648,844
Common units public [Member] | Director [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees 2,236 2,210  
Common units public [Member] | Phantom Share Units (PSUs) [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Phantom units issued 19,745 17,079  
Common units public [Member] | Units issued to staff at Hegh LNG [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Units issued to staff at Hegh LNG   14,622  
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Beginning Balance 2,101,438 2,116,060 2,116,060
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Restricted Stock Award, Gross 13,156,060    
Ending Balance 15,257,498 2,101,438 2,116,060
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member] | Units issued to staff at Hegh LNG [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Units issued to staff at Hegh LNG   (14,622)  
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Beginning Balance 13,156,060 13,156,060 13,156,060
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Restricted Stock Award, Gross (13,156,060)    
Ending Balance   13,156,060 13,156,060
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]      
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]      
Beginning Balance 6,129,070 4,600,000  
Offering     4,600,000
ATM program 496,520 1,529,070  
Ending Balance 6,625,590 6,129,070 4,600,000
v3.20.1
Related party transactions - Balance sheet (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]      
Cash contribution from Hoegh LNG   $ 1,701 $ 2,075
Repayment of indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG $ (64) (2,353) (1,534)
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 194 200 $ 189
Other and contribution from owner 485 472  
Equity: Total 615 20  
Director [Member]      
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]      
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 194 200  
Hoegh LNG and Subsidiaries [Member]      
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]      
Cash contribution from Hoegh LNG 0 1,701  
Repayment of indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG $ (64) $ (2,353)  
v3.20.1
Financial Instruments - Estimated fair value and carrying value (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Cash and cash equivalents $ 39,126 $ 26,326 $ 22,679 $ 18,915
Restricted cash 20,693 19,128    
Amounts due from affiliate 4,296 4,328    
Derivative instruments (14,935) (1,498)    
Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures 3,831 3,536    
Current amounts due to owners and affiliates (2,513) (2,301)    
Long-term Debt (456,961) (435,545)    
Revolving credit facility (8,792) (39,292)    
Lampung Facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt (112,713) (130,275)    
Gallant facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt 0 (140,812)    
Grace facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt 0 (164,458)    
385 million Facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt (344,248) 0    
Recurring [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Cash and cash equivalents 39,126 26,326    
Restricted cash 20,693 19,128    
Recurring [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Derivative instruments (14,935) (1,498)    
Other [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Amounts due from affiliate 4,296 4,328    
Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures 4,029 3,579    
Current amounts due to owners and affiliates (2,513) (2,301)    
Revolving credit facility (8,717) (38,999)    
Other [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt (119,598) (142,087)    
Other [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Gallant facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt 0 (141,538)    
Other [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | Grace facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt 0 (164,210)    
Other [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member] | 385 million Facility [Member]        
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]        
Long-term Debt $ (352,219) $ 0    
v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances - Contract assets and liabilities (Details) - Time Charter Services - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Beginning Balance   $ 303
Additions $ 279  
Reduction for receivables recorded   (303)
Ending Balance 279  
Balance reflected in balance sheet 279  
Beginning Balance (1,834) (6,187)
Additions (65) (1,747)
Reduction for receivables recorded 89  
Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years 497 2,772
Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer 1,188 3,328
Ending Balance (125) (1,834)
Balance reflected in balance sheet $ (125) $ (1,834)
v3.20.1
Subsequent events (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
3 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Mar. 26, 2020
Feb. 17, 2020
Feb. 15, 2020
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Subsequent Event [Line Items]              
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Paid         $ 73,804 $ 72,497 $ 57,037
Common and Subordinated Stock [Member]              
Subsequent Event [Line Items]              
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Distributions Paid, Per Unit       $ 1.76      
Subsequent Event [Member] | Phantom Share Units (PSUs) [Member]              
Subsequent Event [Line Items]              
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Equity Instruments Other than Options, Grants in Period 8,100            
Subsequent Event [Member] | Series A Preferred Stock [Member]              
Subsequent Event [Line Items]              
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Distributions Paid, Per Unit   $ 0.546875          
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Paid   $ 3,700          
Subsequent Event [Member] | Common and Subordinated Stock [Member]              
Subsequent Event [Line Items]              
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Distributions Paid, Per Unit     $ 0.44        
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Paid     $ 15,000        
v3.20.1
Schedule I - Dividends (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Reportable Legal Entities | Parent Company      
Proceeds from Dividends Received $ 42.4 $ 51.7 $ 17.7
v3.20.1
Vessels and other equipment (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Vessels and other equipment  
Schedule of vessels and other equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Dry-

    

  

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Vessel

    

docking

    

Total

Historical cost December 31, 2017

 

$

706,458

 

6,667

 

$

713,125

Additions

 

 

257

 

 —

 

 

257

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

706,715

 

6,667

 

 

713,382

Depreciation for the year

 

 

(19,387)

 

(1,600)

 

 

(20,987)

Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2018

 

 

(50,871)

 

(4,200)

 

 

(55,071)

Vessels, net December 31, 2018

 

 

655,844

 

2,467

 

 

658,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

706,715

 

6,667

 

 

713,382

Additions

 

 

183

 

3,107

 

 

3,290

Historical cost December 31, 2019

 

 

706,898

 

9,774

 

 

716,672

Depreciation for the year

 

 

(19,393)

 

(1,777)

 

 

(21,170)

Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2019

 

 

(70,264)

 

(5,977)

 

 

(76,241)

Vessels, net December 31, 2019

 

$

636,634

 

3,797

 

$

640,431

 

v3.20.1
Income tax (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Income tax  
Schedule of components of income tax expense

The components of income tax expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Current tax (benefit) expense

 

$

4,126

 

4,759

 

$

35

Deferred tax (benefit) expense for

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Change in temporary differences

 

 

3,341

 

3,290

 

 

4,189

Tax loss and tax credit carried forward

 

 

(196)

 

247

 

 

(314)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

 4

 

 9

 

 

(32)

Total deferred tax (benefit) expense

 

 

3,149

 

3,546

 

 

3,843

Total income tax (benefit) expense

 

$

7,275

 

8,305

 

$

3,878

 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Cash flow hedge derivative instruments

 

$

389

 

299

 

$

347

Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in OCI

 

$

389

 

299

 

$

347

 

Schedule of reconciliation of the income before tax at the statutory rate

The reconciliation of the income before tax at the statutory rate in the Marshall Islands to the actual income tax expense for each year is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Income before tax

 

$

60,016

 

85,927

 

$

63,068

At applicable statutory tax rate

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amount computed at corporate tax of 0 %

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

Foreign tax rate differences

 

 

5,425

 

7,513

 

 

7,119

Permanent differences:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amended tax return: reinstatement of tax loss carryforward

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(1,486)

Tax audit or amended tax return: change in uncertain tax position

 

 

558

 

(41)

 

 

(2,228)

Non-deductible interest expense

 

 

1,477

 

875

 

 

752

Non-deductible withholding tax

 

 

717

 

838

 

 

686

Non-deductible loss on derivatives

 

 

120

 

 —

 

 

 —

Tax exemptions

 

 

(13)

 

(36)

 

 

(42)

Non-deductible other financial items

 

 

194

 

116

 

 

81

Other non-deductible costs

 

 

45

 

63

 

 

59

Tax credits

 

 

(1,252)

 

(1,032)

 

 

(1,031)

Adjustment for valuation allowance

 

 

 4

 

 9

 

 

(32)

Tax expense (benefit) for year

 

$

7,275

 

8,305

 

$

3,878

 

Schedule of deferred income tax assets (liabilities)

Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

$

235

 

$

196

Derivative instruments

 

 

565

 

 

954

Other equipment

 

 

 9

 

 

 9

Tax credits carried forward

 

 

1,818

 

 

1,626

Tax loss carryforward

 

 

57

 

 

53

Valuation allowance

 

 

(57)

 

 

(53)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accrued interest income

 

 

(4,123)

 

 

(3,837)

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

(385)

 

 

(154)

Financing lease

 

 

(10,451)

 

 

(7,594)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net

 

$

(12,332)

 

$

(8,800)

 

Schedule of changes in the unrecognized tax benefits

Changes in the unrecognized tax benefits is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1,

 

$

(1,725)

 

(2,626)

 

$

(398)

Increase related to prior year tax positions

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(2,228)

Decrease related to prior year tax positions

 

 

 —

 

434

 

 

 —

Increase related to current year tax positions

 

 

(558)

 

(418)

 

 

 —

Settlements

 

 

 —

 

885

 

 

 —

Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,

 

$

(2,283)

 

(1,725)

 

$

(2,626)

 

v3.20.1
Related party transactions (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Schedule of related party transactions

Amounts due from affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Amounts due from affiliates

 

$

4,296

 

$

4,328

 


Amounts, loans and promissory note due to owners and affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

$

2,513

 

$

2,301

 


Revolving credit facility

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Revolving credit facility

 

$

8,792

 

$

39,292

 

Hoegh LNG and Subsidiaries [Member]  
Schedule of related party transactions

As described in Related party agreements below, subsidiaries of Höegh LNG have provided administrative services to the Partnership and ship management and/or technical support services for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

 

Amounts included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 or included in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Revenues

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant (1)

 

$

47,173

 

47,108

 

$

46,382

Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Höegh LNG (2)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(2,496)

Operating expenses

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Vessel operating expenses (3)

 

 

(24,523)

 

(21,520)

 

 

(21,124)

Hours, travel expense and overhead (4) and Board of Directors’ fees (5)

 

 

(4,072)

 

(3,671)

 

 

(3,284)

Financial (income) expense

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Interest income from joint ventures (6)

 

 

295

 

273

 

 

370

Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG (7)

 

 

(1,882)

 

(2,938)

 

 

(3,934)

Total

 

$

 16,991

 

19,252

 

$

15,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

Balance sheet

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Equity

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash contribution from Höegh LNG (8)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,701

Repayment of indemnification received from Höegh LNG (8)

 

 

(64)

 

 

(2,353)

Issuance of units for Board of Directors’ fees (5)

 

 

194

 

 

200

Other and contribution from owner (9)

 

 

485

 

 

472

Total

 

$

615

 

$

20


1)

Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant: A subsidiary of Höegh LNG, EgyptCo, leases the Höegh Gallant.

2)

Time charter revenues indemnified by/ refunded to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG certain previous indemnification payments in 2017.

3)

Vessel operating expenses: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provides ship management of vessels, including crews and the provision of all other services and supplies.

4)

Hours, travel expenses and overhead: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provide management, accounting, bookkeeping and administrative support under administrative service agreements. These services are charges based upon the actual hours incurred for each individual as registered in the time-write system based on a rate which includes a provision for overhead and any associated travel expenses.

5)

Board of Directors’ fees: Total Board of Directors’ fees were $496,  $501 and $467 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Part of the compensation is awarded as common units of the Partnership. Effective June 4, 2019, a total of 11,180 common units of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $194 for part of directors’ fees for 2019 under the Höegh LNG Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan. Effective June 6, 2018 and May 22, 2017, a total of 11,050 and 9,805 common units, respectively, of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $200 and $189, respectively, for part of directors’ fees for 2018 and 2017. The awards were recorded as administrative expense and as an issuance of common units. Common units are recorded when issued.

6)

Interest income from joint ventures: The Partnership and its joint venture partners have provided subordinated financing to the joint ventures as shareholder loans. Interest income for the Partnership’s shareholder loans to the joint ventures is recorded as interest income.

7)

Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG and affiliates: Höegh LNG and its affiliates provided an $85 million revolving credit facility for general partnership purposes. The Partnership incurred a commitment fee on the undrawn balance until January 29, 2018 and an interest expense on the drawn balance. A seller’s credit note to finance part of the Höegh Gallant acquisition incurred interest expense until it was repaid in October 2017.

8)

Cash contribution from/ distribution to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, Höegh LNG made indemnification payments to the Partnership or received refunds of indemnification from the Partnership which were recorded as contributions or distributions to equity.

9)

Other and contribution from owner: Höegh LNG granted share-based incentives to certain key employees whose services benefit the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as administrative expenses and as a contribution from owner since the Partnership is not invoiced for this employee benefit. Effective March 21, 2019 and September 14, 2018, the Partnership granted or extended the terms for 10,917 and 28,018 phantom units, respectively, to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as an administrative expense and as increase in equity.

v3.20.1
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended 24 Months Ended
Oct. 05, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Oct. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2019
Jan. 26, 2018
Dec. 01, 2017
Jan. 01, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Limited Partners Units       $ 1,029 $ 4,563 $ 0          
Maximum Offering Amount               $ 120,000      
Agent [Member]                      
Sales Commissions       $ 200 $ 800   $ 1,000        
Common Stock [Member]                      
Partners' Capital Account, Units, Sale of Units       53,160 253,106   306,266        
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Limited Partners Units       $ 1,000 $ 4,600            
Average Gross Sales Price Per Share       $ 19.6 $ 18.26            
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                      
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired   49.00%       49.00%     49.00% 51.00%  
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]                      
Repayments of Lines of Credit     $ 34,400                
Line of Credit [Member]                      
Repayments of Lines of Credit     $ 24,300                
Underwritten Public Offering [Member]                      
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued                     6,588,389
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]                      
Partners' Capital Account, Units, Sale of Units       496,520 1,529,070   2,025,590        
Payments to Acquire Businesses and Interest in Affiliates   $ 45,300                  
Shares Issued, Price Per Share $ 25.0                    
Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Limited Partners Units $ 110,900     $ 13,100 $ 38,700   $ 51,700        
Preferred Stock, Dividend Rate, Percentage 8.75%                    
Gross Proceeds from Issuance Preferred Units $ 115,000                    
Average Gross Sales Price Per Share       $ 26.79 $ 25.74            
Limited Partners' Capital Account, Units Issued 4,600,000                    
v3.20.1
Commitments and contingencies (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 14, 2019
Sep. 08, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Sep. 30, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Indemnification Under Technical Modification, Remaining Cost       $ 800        
Repayment of Indemnifications Received From Hoegh Lng       64 $ 2,353 $ 1,534    
Unrecognized Tax Benefits     $ 2,626 2,283 1,725 2,626   $ 398
Exposure to property tax and penalties       3,000        
Annual Property Tax Payable       $ 600        
Income tax examination, year under examination       5 years        
Corporate Joint Venture [Member]                
Loss Contingency, Estimate of Possible Loss   $ 58,000            
Gross Amount Of Arbitration Claim Liability $ 54,000 $ 52,000            
Loss Contingency, Liability associated with the Boil of Claim         23,700   $ 23,700  
Hoegh LNG [Member]                
Indemnification Under Technical Modification, Remaining Cost       $ 400        
Indemnification Under Technical Issues         500 500    
Indemnification payments received       300        
Indemnifications Under Omnibus Agreement         900 1,600    
Repayment of Indemnifications Received From Hoegh Lng       $ 100 2,400 2,500    
Loss Contingency Accrual     $ 11,900     11,900    
Loss Contingency, Damages Sought       Depending on interpretations of the tribunal's determination for the deduction to the gross claim and the other disputed contractual provisions, the joint ventures estimate that their aggregate liability associated with the boil-off claim is in the millions of dollars and could range between the mid-to-upper teens to the mid-$30's        
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest       50.00%        
Deferred Revenue, Revenue Recognized           $ 1,500    
Hoegh LNG [Member] | Corporate Joint Venture [Member]                
Loss Contingency Accrual         $ 11,900      
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest     50.00%   50.00%      
v3.20.1
Income tax - Changes in the unrecognized tax benefits (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Income tax      
Unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, $ (1,725) $ (2,626) $ (398)
Increase related to prior year tax positions 0 0 (2,228)
Decrease related to prior year tax positions 0 434 0
Increase related to current year tax positions (558) (418) 0
Settlements 0 885 0
Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, $ (2,283) $ (1,725) $ (2,626)
v3.20.1
Intangibles and goodwill (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Historical cost, Beginning balance $ 30,760 $ 30,760    
Amortization for the year (3,631) (3,631)    
Accumulated amortization     $ (13,903) $ (10,272)
Historical cost, Ending balance 30,760 30,760    
Intangibles and goodwill     16,857 20,488
Historical cost, Goodwill beginning balance 251 251    
Historical cost, Goodwill ending balance 251 251    
Intangibles and goodwill 251 251 251 251
Historical cost, Beginning balance 20,739 31,011    
Accumulated amortization     (13,903) (10,272)
Amortization for the year (3,631) (3,631)    
Historical cost, Ending balance 17,108 20,739    
Option for time charter extension [Member]        
Historical cost, Beginning balance 8,000 8,000    
Historical cost, Ending balance 8,000 8,000    
Intangibles and goodwill     8,000 8,000
Above Market Time Charter [Member]        
Historical cost, Beginning balance 22,760 22,760    
Amortization for the year (3,631) (3,631)    
Accumulated amortization     (13,903) (10,272)
Historical cost, Ending balance $ 22,760 $ 22,760    
Intangibles and goodwill     $ 8,857 $ 12,488
v3.20.1
Advances to joint ventures (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Advances to joint ventures    
Long-term advances to joint ventures $ 3,831 $ 3,536
Advances/shareholder loans to joint ventures $ 3,831 $ 3,536
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Cash flow hedge accounting (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness $ (956) $ (855) $ (855)
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness, tax 0 (299) $ (347)
Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness, tax 0    
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach 987 $ (3,557)  
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach, tax 389    
Settlement of cash flow hedge, tax 0    
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments, tax 389    
Interest rate swap [Member]      
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness (956)    
Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness 966    
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach (987)    
Settlement of cash flow hedge 199    
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments $ (778)    
v3.20.1
Income tax (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Income tax      
Total current tax (benefit) expense $ 4,126 $ 4,759 $ 35
Deferred tax (benefit) expense for      
Change in temporary differences 3,341 3,290 4,189
Tax loss and tax credit carried forward (196) 247 (314)
Change in valuation allowance 4 9 (32)
Total deferred tax (benefit) expense 3,149 3,546 3,843
Total income tax (benefit) expense $ 7,275 $ 8,305 $ 3,878
v3.20.1
Business combinations (Details)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]  
Use of proceeds from public offering (issuance of 6,588,389 common units to the public) $ 45,300
Working capital adjustment 800
Liabilities assumed  
Total liabilities assumed (91,522)
Total identifiable net assets 89,898
Acquired share in total identifiable net asset 3,236
Hoegh Grace  
Acquired Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]  
Use of proceeds from public offering (issuance of 6,588,389 common units to the public) 91,768
Working capital adjustment 407
Total consideration 92,175
Assets acquired  
Cash and cash equivalents 3,774
Restricted cash 19
Trade receivables 4,446
Prepaid expenses and other receivables 51
Vessel 357,138
Other equipment 30
Intangibles: Above market time charter 11,760
Other long term assets 830
Total assets 378,048
Liabilities assumed  
Trade payables (193)
Amounts due to owners and affiliates (622)
Accrued liabilities and other payables (1,569)
Total long term debt (192,286)
Derivative instruments (2,642)
Total liabilities assumed (197,312)
Total identifiable net assets 180,736
Non-controlling interest in total identifiable net assets 88,561
Acquired share in total identifiable net asset $ 92,175
v3.20.1
Supplemental cash flow information (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Supplemental cash flow information  
Schedule of supplemental cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Non-cash expenditures for vessel and other equipment

 

$

 —

 

(229)

 

$

 —

Non-cash acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

41,362

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Non-cash revolving credit facility draw for the acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

$

41,362

 

v3.20.1
Description of business (Details)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Hoegh LNG Partners LP [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Marshall Islands
Purpose Holding Company
Hoegh LNG Partners Operating LLC [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Marshall Islands
Purpose Holding Company
Hoegh LNG Services Ltd [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration United Kingdom
Purpose Administration Services Company
Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Singapore
Purpose Owns 49% of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung
PT Hoegh LNG Lampung [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Indonesia
Purpose Owns PGN FSRU Lampung
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cayman Islands
Purpose Owns Neptune
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cayman Islands
Purpose Owns Cape Ann
Hoegh LNG FRSU III Ltd  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cayman Islands
Purpose Holding Company
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cyprus
Purpose Owns Höegh Gallant
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Egypt
Purpose Branch of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited
Hoegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cayman Islands
Purpose Owns 100% of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Cayman Islands
Purpose Owns Höegh Grace
Hoegh LNG Colombia S A S [Member]  
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]  
Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Registration Colombia
Purpose Operating Company
v3.20.1
Description of business (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Description of business  
Schedule of entities

The following table lists the entities included in these consolidated financial statements and their purpose as of December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Jurisdiction of

    

  

 

 

Incorporation

 

  

Name

 

or Registration

 

Purpose

Höegh LNG Partners LP

 

Marshall Islands

 

Holding Company

Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (100% owned) (4)

 

Marshall Islands

 

Holding Company

Hoegh LNG Services Ltd (100% owned)

 

United Kingdom

 

Administration Services Company

Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. (100% owned)

 

Singapore

 

Owns 49% of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung

PT Hoegh LNG Lampung (49% owned) (1)

 

Indonesia

 

Owns PGN FSRU Lampung

SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (50% owned) (2)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Neptune

SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (50% owned) (2)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Cape Ann

Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. (100% owned) (4)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Holding Company

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited (100% owned)

 

Cyprus

 

Owns Höegh Gallant

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited Egypt Branch (100% owned)

 

Egypt

 

Branch of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited

Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. (100% owned) (3)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns 100% of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. and Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S.

Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. (100% indirectly owned) (3)

 

Cayman Islands

 

Owns Höegh Grace

Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. (100% indirectly owned) (3)

 

Colombia

 

Operating Company


(1)

PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a variable interest entity, which is controlled by Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd. and is, therefore, 100% consolidated in the consolidated financial statements.

(2)

The remaining 50% interest in each joint venture is owned by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and Tokyo LNG Tanker Co.

(3)

The 51% of the ownership interests were acquired on January 3, 2017, and the remaining 49% of the ownership interests were acquired on December 1, 2017.

(4)

On January 31, 2019, Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. transferred its ownership in Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited to Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC. On February 14, 2020, the Certificate of Dissolution was received, certifying that Höegh LNG FSRU III Ltd. will be dissolved on May 4, 2020.

v3.20.1
Earning per unit and cash distributions
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Earning per unit and cash distributions  
Earning per unit and cash distributions

22.   Earning per unit and cash distributions

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit are presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per unit numbers)

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

Net income

    

$

52,741

    

 

77,622

    

$

59,190

Adjustment for:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Non-controlling interest

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,408

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

13,850

 

 

12,303

 

 

2,480

Limited partners' interest in net income

 

 

38,891

 

 

65,319

 

 

46,302

Less: Dividends paid or to be paid (1)

 

 

(60,149)

 

 

(59,952)

 

 

(57,764)

Under (over) distributed earnings

 

 

(21,258)

 

 

5,367

 

 

(11,462)

Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

(11,514)

 

 

2,900

 

 

(6,145)

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

(3,211)

 

 

340

 

 

(736)

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

(6,533)

 

 

2,127

 

 

(4,581)

 

 

$

(21,258)

 

 

5,367

 

$

(11,462)

Basic weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

17,986

 

 

17,856

 

 

17,645

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

7,039

 

 

2,101

 

 

2,116

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

8,218

 

 

13,156

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

17,995

 

 

17,864

 

 

17,657

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

7,039

 

 

2,101

 

 

2,116

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

8,218

 

 

13,156

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per unit (2):

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common unit public

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.93

 

$

1.37

Common unit Höegh LNG (3)

 

$

1.84

 

$

2.03

 

$

1.44

Subordinated unit Höegh LNG (3)

 

$

0.70

 

$

2.03

 

$

1.45


(1)

Includes all distributions paid or to be paid in relationship to the period, regardless of whether the declaration and payment dates were prior to the end of the period and is based the number of units outstanding at the period end.

(2)

Effective March 21, 2019, granted 10,917 phantom units to the CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective March 23, 2018, the Partnership granted 14,584 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective June 3, 2016, the Partnership granted 21,500 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of December 31, 2017, November 30, 2018 and November 30, 2019, respectively. On September 14, 2018, the plan was amended to extend the terms and conditions of such unvested units for the grants effective March 23, 2017 and June 3, 2016 of the then-serving CEO/CFO that resigned as CEO/CFO of the Partnership. The phantom units impact the diluted weighted average units outstanding.

(3)

Includes total amounts attributable to incentive distributions rights of $1,597,  $1,591 and $1,141 for the years ended December 31, 2019,  2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $908,  $219 and $158 was attributed to common units owned by Höegh LNG and $688,  $1,372 and $983 was attributed to subordinated units owned by Höegh LNG, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(4)

On August 16, 2019, all subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis.

Earnings per unit is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common and subordinated units outstanding during the applicable period.

The common unitholders’ interest in net income is calculated as if all net income were distributed according to terms of the Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”), regardless of whether those earnings would or could be distributed. The Partnership Agreement does not provide for the distribution of net income; rather, it provides for the distribution of available cash. Available cash, a contractual defined term, generally means all cash on hand at the end of the quarter after deduction for cash reserves established by the board of directors and the Partnership’s subsidiaries to i) provide for the proper conduct of the business (including reserves for future capital expenditures and for the anticipated credit needs); ii) comply with applicable law, any of the debt instruments or other agreements; iii) provide funds for payments on the Series A preferred units; and iv) provide funds for distributions to the unitholders for any one or more of the next four quarters. Therefore, the earnings per unit are not indicative of future cash distributions that may be made. Unlike available cash, net income is affected by non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, unrealized gains or losses on derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions.

In addition, Höegh LNG currently holds all the IDRs in the Partnership. IDRs represent the rights to receive an increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash for operating surplus after the minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels have been achieved.

Distributions of available cash from operating surplus are to be made among the unitholders and the holders of the IDRs in the following manner for any quarter after the subordination period:

·

first,  100.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, until each such unitholder receives a total of $0.388125 per unit for  that quarter;

·

second,  85.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata, until each such unitholder  receives a total of $0.421875 per unit for that quarter;

·

third,  75.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 25.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata, until each such unitholder  receives a total of $0.50625 per unit for that quarter; and

·

thereafter,  50.0% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 50.0% to the holders of the IDRs, pro rata.

In each case, the percentage interests set forth above assume that the Partnership does not issue additional classes of equity securities.

v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Time charter revenues and related contract balances  
Schedule of disaggregated revenue

The following tables summarize the disaggregated revenue of the Partnership by segment for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations (1)

    

reporting

Lease revenues, excluding amortization (2)

 

$

88,889

 

25,690

 

 —

 

114,579

 

(25,690)

 

$

88,889

Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization

 

 

60,063

 

14,095

 

 —

 

74,158

 

(14,095)

 

 

60,063

Amortization of above market contract intangibles

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock

 

 

 —

 

2,648

 

 —

 

2,648

 

(2,648)

 

 

 —

Other revenue (3)

 

 

115

 

 —

 

 —

 

115

 

 —

 

 

115

Total revenues (4)

 

$

145,436

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,869

 

(42,433)

 

$

145,436

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations (1)

    

reporting

Lease revenues, excluding amortization

 

$

89,215

 

25,690

 

 —

 

114,905

 

(25,690)

 

$

89,215

Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization

 

 

59,368

 

15,078

 

 —

 

74,446

 

(15,078)

 

 

59,368

Amortization of above market contract intangibles

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock

 

 

 —

 

2,401

 

 —

 

2,401

 

(2,401)

 

 

 —

Other revenue (3)

 

 

1,609

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,609

 

 —

 

 

1,609

Total revenues (4)

 

$

146,561

 

43,169

 

 —

 

189,730

 

(43,169)

 

$

146,561


(1)

Eliminations reverse the proportional amounts of revenue for Joint venture FSRUs to reflect the consolidated revenues included in the consolidated income statement. The Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs revenues is included in Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures on the consolidated income statement.

(2)

The financing lease revenues comprise about one-fourth of the total lease revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.

(3)

Other revenue consists of insurance proceeds received for prior period claims related to repairs under the Mooring warranty and for repairs for the Höegh Gallant. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the cost of the repairs related to the Mooring, subject to repayment to the extent recovered from insurance proceeds. Refer to notes 4 and 18.

(4)

Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of total revenues and is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Schedule of consolidated receivables between lease and service

The following table summarizes the allocation of consolidated receivables between lease and service components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Trade receivable for lease

 

$

2,898

 

$

2,898

Trade receivable for time charter services

 

 

2,133

 

 

2,658

Total trade receivable and amounts due from affiliates

 

$

5,031

 

$

5,556

 

Schedule of contract assets and liabilities refund liabilities to customers

The following table summarizes the consolidated contract assets, contract liabilities and refund liabilities to customers, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Services related

 

 

Contract

 

Refund liability

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

asset

    

to charters

Balance January 1, 2019

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,834)

Additions

 

 

279

 

 

(65)

Reduction for receivables recorded

 

 

 —

 

 

89

Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years

 

 

 —

 

 

497

Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer

 

 

 —

 

 

1,188

Balance December 31, 2019

 

 

279

 

 

(125)

Netting of contract asset and contract liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2019

 

$

279

 

$

(125)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services related

 

 

Contract

 

Refund liability

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

asset

    

to charters

Balance January 1, 2018

 

$

303

 

$

(6,187)

Additions

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,747)

Reduction for receivables recorded

 

 

(303)

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years

 

 

 —

 

 

2,772

Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer

 

 

 —

 

 

3,328

Balance December 31, 2018

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,834)

Netting of contract asset and contract liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2018

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,834)

 

Schedule of contractual future revenues

As of December 31, 2019, the minimum contractual future revenues to be received under the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace during the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Service related

    

Lease related

    

Total

2020

 

$

24,880

 

 

71,100

 

$

95,980

2021

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2022

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2023

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2024

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

Thereafter

 

 

116,386

 

 

346,369

 

 

462,755

Total - undiscounted

 

$

220,078

 

 

657,081

 

$

877,159

Operating lease

 

 

 

 

$

223,644

 

 

  

Financing lease

 

 

 

 

 

433,437

 

 

  

Discounting effect

 

 

 

 

 

(193,437)

 

 

  

Financing lease receivable

 

 

 

 

$

240,000

 

 

  

 

Schedule of net investment in financing lease

The financing lease is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investment in financing lease, a receivable, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Minimum lease payments

 

$

589,074

 

$

589,074

Unguaranteed residual value

 

 

146,000

 

 

146,000

Unearned income

 

 

(440,345)

 

 

(440,345)

Initial direct cost, net

 

 

3,095

 

 

3,095

Net investment in financing lease at origination

 

 

297,824

 

 

297,824

Principal repayment and amortization

 

 

(18,920)

 

 

(14,751)

Net investment in financing lease at period end

 

 

278,904

 

 

283,073

Less: Current portion

 

 

(4,551)

 

 

(4,168)

Long term net investment in financing lease

 

$

274,353

 

$

278,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment in financing lease consists of:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Financing lease receivable

 

$

240,000

 

$

247,488

Discounted unguaranteed residual value

 

 

38,904

 

 

35,585

Net investment in financing lease at period end

 

$

278,904

 

$

283,073

 

v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Time charter revenues and related contract balances  
Time charter revenues and related contract balances

5.   Time charter revenues and related contract balances

The Partnership presents its revenue by segment, disaggregated by revenue recognized in accordance with accounting standards on leasing and on revenue from contracts with customers for time charter services. In addition, material elements where the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows differ from the monthly invoicing under time charter contracts are separately presented. Revenue recognized for the Majority held FSRUs includes the amortization of above market contract intangibles. Revenue recognized for Joint venture FSRUs include the amortization of deferred revenues related to the charterer’s reimbursements for certain vessel modifications and drydocking costs. As a result, the timing of cash flows differs from monthly time charter invoicing.

The following tables summarize the disaggregated revenue of the Partnership by segment for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations (1)

    

reporting

Lease revenues, excluding amortization (2)

 

$

88,889

 

25,690

 

 —

 

114,579

 

(25,690)

 

$

88,889

Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization

 

 

60,063

 

14,095

 

 —

 

74,158

 

(14,095)

 

 

60,063

Amortization of above market contract intangibles

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock

 

 

 —

 

2,648

 

 —

 

2,648

 

(2,648)

 

 

 —

Other revenue (3)

 

 

115

 

 —

 

 —

 

115

 

 —

 

 

115

Total revenues (4)

 

$

145,436

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,869

 

(42,433)

 

$

145,436

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations (1)

    

reporting

Lease revenues, excluding amortization

 

$

89,215

 

25,690

 

 —

 

114,905

 

(25,690)

 

$

89,215

Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization

 

 

59,368

 

15,078

 

 —

 

74,446

 

(15,078)

 

 

59,368

Amortization of above market contract intangibles

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock

 

 

 —

 

2,401

 

 —

 

2,401

 

(2,401)

 

 

 —

Other revenue (3)

 

 

1,609

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,609

 

 —

 

 

1,609

Total revenues (4)

 

$

146,561

 

43,169

 

 —

 

189,730

 

(43,169)

 

$

146,561


(1)

Eliminations reverse the proportional amounts of revenue for Joint venture FSRUs to reflect the consolidated revenues included in the consolidated income statement. The Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs revenues is included in Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures on the consolidated income statement.

(2)

The financing lease revenues comprise about one-fourth of the total lease revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019.

(3)

Other revenue consists of insurance proceeds received for prior period claims related to repairs under the Mooring warranty and for repairs for the Höegh Gallant. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the cost of the repairs related to the Mooring, subject to repayment to the extent recovered from insurance proceeds. Refer to notes 4 and 18.

(4)

Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of total revenues and is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership did not present disaggregated time charter revenues. Refer to note 4 for the combined time charter revenues by segment for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The Partnership’s risk and exposure related to uncertainty of revenues or cash flows related to its long-term time charter contracts primarily relate to the credit risk associated with the individual charterers. Payments are due under time charter contracts regardless of the demand for the charterers’ gas output or the utilization of the FSRU.

The consolidated trade receivables, contract assets, contract liabilities and refund liabilities included in the table below, exclude the balances for the Joint venture FSRUs. The Partnership’s share of net assets in the Joint venture FSRUs are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet using the equity method on the line accumulated losses in joint ventures.

The following table summarizes the allocation of consolidated receivables between lease and service components:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Trade receivable for lease

 

$

2,898

 

$

2,898

Trade receivable for time charter services

 

 

2,133

 

 

2,658

Total trade receivable and amounts due from affiliates

 

$

5,031

 

$

5,556

 

There were no impairment losses for lease or service receivables or contract assets for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

The following table summarizes the consolidated contract assets, contract liabilities and refund liabilities to customers, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Services related

 

 

Contract

 

Refund liability

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

asset

    

to charters

Balance January 1, 2019

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,834)

Additions

 

 

279

 

 

(65)

Reduction for receivables recorded

 

 

 —

 

 

89

Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years

 

 

 —

 

 

497

Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer

 

 

 —

 

 

1,188

Balance December 31, 2019

 

 

279

 

 

(125)

Netting of contract asset and contract liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2019

 

$

279

 

$

(125)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services related

 

 

Contract

 

Refund liability

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

asset

    

to charters

Balance January 1, 2018

 

$

303

 

$

(6,187)

Additions

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,747)

Reduction for receivables recorded

 

 

(303)

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized (excluding amortization)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years

 

 

 —

 

 

2,772

Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer

 

 

 —

 

 

3,328

Balance December 31, 2018

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,834)

Netting of contract asset and contract liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Balance reflected in balance sheet December 31, 2018

 

$

 —

 

$

(1,834)

 

Contract assets are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other receivables. Current and non-current contract liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables and other long-term liabilities, respectively. Refund liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of accrued liabilities and other payables.

Refund liabilities to charterers include invoiced revenue to be refunded to charterers for estimated reimbursable costs that exceeded the actual cost incurred and for non-compliance with performance warranties in the time charter contracts that result in reduction of hire, liquidated damages or other performance related payments.

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the major changes in the refund liability to charterers related to the settlement of a 2018 performance claim of $1,101 and the recognition of $497 of revenue related to conclusion of an audit by a charterer related to 2018 reimbursable expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the major changes related to recognition of previously constrained revenue related to prior periods’ performance obligations of $2,772 and repayment of $3,328 for the conclusion of an audit by a charterer at the end of 2017 and in the third quarter of 2018 for the amount the charterer would reimburse for certain 2014, 2015 and 2016 costs.

Minimum contractual future revenues:

As of December 31, 2019, the minimum contractual future revenues to be received under the time charters for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace during the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Service related

    

Lease related

    

Total

2020

 

$

24,880

 

 

71,100

 

$

95,980

2021

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2022

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2023

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

2024

 

 

19,703

 

 

59,903

 

 

79,606

Thereafter

 

 

116,386

 

 

346,369

 

 

462,755

Total - undiscounted

 

$

220,078

 

 

657,081

 

$

877,159

Operating lease

 

 

 

 

$

223,644

 

 

  

Financing lease

 

 

 

 

 

433,437

 

 

  

Discounting effect

 

 

 

 

 

(193,437)

 

 

  

Financing lease receivable

 

 

 

 

$

240,000

 

 

  

 

The long-term time charter for the PGN FSRU Lampung with PGN LNG has an initial term of 20 years from the acceptance date of October 30, 2014 and the contract expires in 2034. The time charter hire payments began July 21, 2014 when the project was ready to begin commissioning. The lease element of the time charter is accounted for as a financing lease. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease and services elements for the initial term but exclude the variable fees from the charterer for vessel operating expenses and reimbursement of tax expenses. The charterer has an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung, which can be exercised after the third anniversary of the commencement of the charter until the twentieth anniversary, at stated prices in the time charter. The minimum contractual future revenues do not include the unexercised purchase option price. Should the purchase option be exercised in the short to medium term, the contractual price would exceed the net investment in financing lease, but the future hire payments would cease. The time charter also provides options for the charterer to extend the lease term for two five-year periods. Unexercised option periods are excluded from the minimum contractual future revenues.

The long-term time charter for the Höegh Gallant has an initial term of five years from April 2015 and the contract expires in 2020. The lease element of the time charter is accounted for as an operating lease. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease element and the services element which also covers the vessel operating expenses and taxes. Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the initial five-year charter until July 2025 at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, the Partnership exercised its option and intends to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors. Since the option was exercised after the balance sheet date, the estimated fixed payments for the exercised option periods are excluded in the minimum contractual future revenues.

The long-term time charter for the Höegh Grace has an initial term of 20 years and the contract expires in 2036. The minimum contractual future revenues in the table above include the fixed payments for the lease element and services element but exclude the variable fees from the charterer for vessel operating expenses and reimbursement of certain taxes. The non-cancellable charter period is 10 years. The initial term of the lease is 20 years. However, each party has an unconditional option to cancel the charter after 10 and 15 years without penalty. However, if the charterer waives its right to terminate in year 10 within a certain deadline, the Partnership will not be able to exercise its right to terminate in year 10. The charterer has an option to purchase the Höegh Grace at a price specified in the Höegh Grace charter in year 15 and year 20 of such charter. The minimum contractual future revenues do not include the unexercised purchase option price. Only the non-cancellable lease period is included the minimum contractual future revenues.

Net investment in financing lease:

The lease element of time charter hire for the PGN FSRU Lampung is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. The financing lease is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investment in financing lease, a receivable, as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Minimum lease payments

 

$

589,074

 

$

589,074

Unguaranteed residual value

 

 

146,000

 

 

146,000

Unearned income

 

 

(440,345)

 

 

(440,345)

Initial direct cost, net

 

 

3,095

 

 

3,095

Net investment in financing lease at origination

 

 

297,824

 

 

297,824

Principal repayment and amortization

 

 

(18,920)

 

 

(14,751)

Net investment in financing lease at period end

 

 

278,904

 

 

283,073

Less: Current portion

 

 

(4,551)

 

 

(4,168)

Long term net investment in financing lease

 

$

274,353

 

$

278,905

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment in financing lease consists of:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Financing lease receivable

 

$

240,000

 

$

247,488

Discounted unguaranteed residual value

 

 

38,904

 

 

35,585

Net investment in financing lease at period end

 

$

278,904

 

$

283,073

 

There was no impairment loss, or allowance for doubtful accounts, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

v3.20.1
Investments in joint ventures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Investments in joint ventures  
Investments in joint ventures

9.   Investments in joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Accumulated earnings of joint ventures

 

$

3,270

 

$

 —

Accumulated losses of joint ventures

 

$

 —

 

$

(2,808)

 

The Partnership has a 50% interest in each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (owner of the Neptune) and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (owner of the Cape Ann). The following table presents the summarized financial information of the joint ventures on a 100% combined basis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

Time charter revenues

 

$

77,051

 

79,654

 

$

84,330

 

Accrual historical boil-off claim (note 18)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(23,700)

 

Other income

 

 

7,814

 

6,684

 

 

 —

 

Total revenues

 

 

84,865

 

86,338

 

 

60,630

 

Operating expenses

 

 

(18,088)

 

(21,864)

 

 

(17,256)

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(20,524)

 

(20,065)

 

 

(20,244)

 

Impairment of long-lived assets (1)

 

 

(149)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Operating income

 

 

46,104

 

44,409

 

 

23,130

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

(10,418)

 

16,992

 

 

14,388

 

Other financial expense, net

 

 

(24,144)

 

(26,140)

 

 

(27,854)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

11,542

 

35,261

 

$

9,664

 

Share of joint ventures owned

 

 

50

%

50

%

 

50

%

Share of joint ventures net income (loss) before eliminations

 

 

5,771

 

17,631

 

 

4,832

 

Eliminations

 

 

307

 

307

 

 

307

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

$

6,078

 

17,938

 

$

5,139

 


(1)

At the completion of the class renewal survey of the Neptune, certain equipment was identified that was impaired.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

    

December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

17,897

 

$

7,958

 

Restricted cash

 

 

9,250

 

 

13,844

 

Other current assets

 

 

973

 

 

1,894

 

Total current assets

 

 

28,120

 

 

23,696

 

Restricted cash

 

 

34,650

 

 

25,448

 

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

 

521,060

 

 

539,324

 

Deferred charges

 

 

 —

 

 

194

 

Total long-term assets

 

 

555,710

 

 

564,966

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

28,297

 

 

26,599

 

Amounts and loans due to owners and affiliates

 

 

629

 

 

1,215

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

13,089

 

 

10,178

 

Refund liabilities

 

 

26,691

 

 

26,055

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

10,327

 

 

8,924

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

79,033

 

 

72,971

 

Long-term debt

 

 

375,091

 

 

403,052

 

Loans due to owners and affiliates

 

 

7,663

 

 

7,071

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

59,070

 

 

51,563

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

40,952

 

 

43,526

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

482,776

 

 

505,212

 

Net assets (liabilities)

 

$

22,021

 

$

10,479

 

Share of joint ventures owned

 

 

50

%

 

50

%

Share of joint ventures net assets (liabilities) before eliminations

 

 

11,011

 

 

5,240

 

Eliminations

 

 

(7,741)

 

 

(8,048)

 

Accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

$

3,270

 

$

(2,808)

 

 

v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
Dec. 29, 2014
Mar. 17, 2014
Dec. 31, 2019
Feb. 28, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Jan. 01, 2017
Oct. 01, 2015
Debt Instrument Financial Covenants     $ 385.0        
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedge Gain (Loss) to be Reclassified During Next 12 Months, Net     3.2        
$385 million facility [Member]              
Debt Instrument Financial Covenants     $ 385.0   $ 385.0    
Derivative, Notional Amount       $ 127.7 130.0    
2.941% rate [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount         65.0    
2.838% rate [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount         $ 65.0    
2.650% rate [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount       63.8      
2.735% rate [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount       $ 63.8      
Grace [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount           $ 164.0  
Debt Instrument, Face Amount           $ 164.0  
Maximum [Member] | Grace [Member]              
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage           2.315%  
Maximum [Member] | Hoegh Gallant [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount             $ 146.3
Derivative, Fixed Interest Rate             1.9145%
Minimum [Member] | Grace [Member]              
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage           2.305%  
Minimum [Member] | Hoegh Gallant [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount             $ 146.3
Derivative, Fixed Interest Rate             1.9105%
Interest rate swap [Member] | Maximum [Member] | $385 million facility [Member]              
Derivative, Fixed Interest Rate       2.735% 2.838%    
Interest rate swap [Member] | Minimum [Member] | $385 million facility [Member]              
Derivative, Fixed Interest Rate       2.65% 2.941%    
Lampung Facility [Member]              
Derivative, Notional Amount   $ 237.1          
Derivative, Term of Contract   12 years          
Derivative, Fixed Interest Rate   2.80%          
Repayments of Secured Debt $ 7.9            
v3.20.1
Income tax - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Tax Credit Carryforward, Amount     $ 1,486  
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, Change in Deferred Tax Assets Valuation Allowance, Amount $ 4 $ 9 (32)  
Unrecognized Tax Benefits 2,283 1,725 2,626 $ 398
Reduction to the uncertain tax position   434    
Increases in uncertain tax positions 558 418    
Amended tax return: reinstatement of tax loss carryforward 0 885 0  
Other Noncash Income Tax Expense 867 852 861  
Accrued Income Taxes, Noncurrent 2,283 1,725    
Reversal of uncertain tax position     2,228  
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) $ 7,275 $ 8,305 $ 3,878  
Colombia        
Income tax subject to examination year 2017      
Indonesia        
Income tax subject to examination year 2015      
Income Tax Examination Year Concluded Audit 2013      
Income Tax Examination Year Concluded Audit One 2014      
SINGAPORE        
Income tax subject to examination year 2015      
Tax Credit Carry forward Expiring In 2020 And 2023 [Member]        
Tax Credit Carryforward, Amount $ 455      
Tax Credit Carryforward Expiring In 2020 [Member]        
Tax Credit Carryforward, Amount $ 566      
Tax Credit Carryforward, Year of Expiration 2020      
Tax Credit Carryforward Expiring In 2021 [Member]        
Tax Credit Carryforward, Amount $ 1,003      
Tax Credit Carryforward, Year of Expiration 2021      
v3.20.1
Intangibles and goodwill - Estimated future amortization expense (Details)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
USD ($)
Intangibles and goodwill  
2020 $ 3,053
2021 2,755
2022 2,755
2023 2,755
2024 2,762
2025 and thereafter $ 2,777
v3.20.1
Advances to joint ventures - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Advances to Joint Ventures [Line Items]    
Due from Joint Ventures $ 3,831 $ 3,536
Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.20%  
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member]    
Advances to Joint Ventures [Line Items]    
Due from Joint Ventures $ 3,000 2,800
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd [Member]    
Advances to Joint Ventures [Line Items]    
Due from Joint Ventures $ 800 $ 700
Shareholder [Member]    
Advances to Joint Ventures [Line Items]    
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage 8.00%  
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Fair value of derivative instruments (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]    
Derivative Asset, Current $ 0 $ 1,199
Derivative Liability, Current (2,907) (259)
Derivative Liability, Noncurrent (12,028) (2,438)
Interest rate swap [Member]    
Derivatives, Fair Value [Line Items]    
Derivative Asset, Current 0 1,199
Derivative Asset, Noncurrent 0 0
Derivative Liability, Current (2,907) (259)
Derivative Liability, Noncurrent $ (12,028) $ (2,438)
v3.20.1
Income tax - Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in OCI (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Income tax      
Cash flow hedge derivative instruments $ 389 $ 299 $ 347
Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in OCI $ 389 $ 299 $ 347
v3.20.1
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Gross proceeds for units issued $ 14,340 $ 43,983  
Less: Commissions (246) (761)  
Net proceeds for units issued 14,094 43,222  
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]      
Gross proceeds for units issued 13,298 39,360 $ 115,000
Less: Commissions (233) (701)  
Net proceeds for units issued 13,065 38,659 110,924
Less: Underwriters' discount     (3,623)
Less: Offering expenses     $ (453)
Common Units [Member]      
Gross proceeds for units issued 1,042 4,623  
Less: Commissions (13) (60)  
Net proceeds for units issued $ 1,029 $ 4,563  
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Risk management and concentrations of risk  
Schedule of interest rate swap agreements

As of December 31, 2019, the following interest rate swap agreements were outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Fair

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

value

 

 

 

Fixed

 

 

 

Interest

 

 

 

 

carrying

 

 

 

interest

 

 

 

rate

 

Notional

 

amount

 

  

 

rate

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

index

    

amount

    

liability

    

Term

    

(1)

 

LIBOR-based debt

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Lampung interest rate swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

117,022

 

$

(3,610)

 

Sep 2026

 

2.800

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(3,241)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.941

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,909)

 

Oct 2025

 

2.838

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,699)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.735

%

$385 million facility swaps (2)

 

LIBOR

 

$

61,478

 

$

(2,476)

 

Jan 2026

 

2.650

%


1)

Excludes the margins paid on the floating-rate debt.

2)

All interest rate swaps are U.S. dollar denominated and the notional amount reduces quarterly from the effective date of the interest rate swaps.

Schedule of fair value of derivative instruments

The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments, segregated by type of contract, on the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

Long-term

 

Current

 

Long-term

 

 

assets:

 

assets:

 

liabilities:

 

liabilities:

 

 

derivative

 

derivative

 

derivative

 

derivative

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

instruments

    

instruments

    

instruments

    

instruments

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest rate swaps

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

(2,907)

 

$

(12,028)

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Interest rate swaps

 

$

1,199

 

$

 —

 

$

(259)

 

$

(2,438)

 

Schedule of effect of cash flow hedge accounting on the consolidated statement of income

The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in gain (loss) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Interest expense

    

benefit

Gain (loss) on interest rate swaps in cash flow hedging relationships:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness

 

$

(956)

 

$

 —

Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness

 

 

966

 

 

 —

Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach

 

 

(987)

 

 

389

Settlement of cash flow hedge

 

 

199

 

 

 —

Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments

 

$

(778)

 

$

389

 


The following effects of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in total gains (losses) on derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2018

    

2017

Interest rate swaps:

 

  

 

 

  

 

Ineffective portion of cash flow hedge

 

$

(990)

 

$

(2)

Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness

 

 

2,969

 

 

3,320

Reclassification discontinued hedge from OCI

 

 

3,557

 

 

 —

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

(855)

 

 

(855)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 

 

4,681

 

 

2,463

Realized gains (losses)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments

 

$

4,681

 

$

2,463

 

Schedule of effect of cash flow hedge accounting on accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) and earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

Earnings

 

 

Before tax

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gains

 

Tax benefit

 

OCI: Net of

 

Interest

 

Tax

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

(losses)

    

(expense)

    

tax

    

expense

    

benefit

Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2018

 

$

(5,902)

 

565

 

$

(5,337)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach

 

 

(625)

 

 —

 

 

(625)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

(13,535)

 

 —

 

 

(13,535)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income included in hedge effectiveness

 

 

956

 

 —

 

 

956

 

 

(956)

 

 

 —

Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach

 

 

987

 

(389)

 

 

598

 

 

(987)

 

 

389

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

(12,217)

 

(389)

 

 

(12,606)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accumulated OCI as of December 31, 2019

 

$

(18,119)

 

176

 

$

(17,943)

 

 

  

 

 

  

Gain (loss) reclassified to earnings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

$

(1,943)

 

$

389

 

The effect of cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps and the related tax effects on other comprehensive income and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) is as follows as of and for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedge

 

 

 

 

 

Before tax

 

Tax benefit

 

 

 

Accumulated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

gains (losses)

    

(expense)

    

Net of tax

    

OCI

Balance as of December 31, 2016

 

$

(6,947)

 

1,211

 

(5,736)

 

$

(5,736)

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

2,480

 

 —

 

2,480

 

 

2,480

Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

855

 

(347)

 

508

 

 

508

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

3,335

 

(347)

 

2,988

 

 

2,988

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

(3,612)

 

864

 

(2,748)

 

$

(2,748)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2017

 

$

(3,612)

 

864

 

(2,748)

 

$

(2,748)

Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge

 

 

412

 

 —

 

412

 

 

412

Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

855

 

(299)

 

556

 

 

556

Reclassification of discontinued cash flow hedge to earnings

 

 

(3,557)

 

 —

 

(3,557)

 

 

(3,557)

Other comprehensive income for period

 

 

(2,290)

 

(299)

 

(2,589)

 

 

(2,589)

Balance as of December 31, 2018

 

$

(5,902)

 

565

 

(5,337)

 

$

(5,337)

 

v3.20.1
Earning per unit and cash distributions (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Earning per unit and cash distributions  
Schedule of calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per unit numbers)

 

2019

 

2018

 

2017

Net income

    

$

52,741

    

 

77,622

    

$

59,190

Adjustment for:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Non-controlling interest

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

10,408

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

13,850

 

 

12,303

 

 

2,480

Limited partners' interest in net income

 

 

38,891

 

 

65,319

 

 

46,302

Less: Dividends paid or to be paid (1)

 

 

(60,149)

 

 

(59,952)

 

 

(57,764)

Under (over) distributed earnings

 

 

(21,258)

 

 

5,367

 

 

(11,462)

Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

(11,514)

 

 

2,900

 

 

(6,145)

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

(3,211)

 

 

340

 

 

(736)

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

(6,533)

 

 

2,127

 

 

(4,581)

 

 

$

(21,258)

 

 

5,367

 

$

(11,462)

Basic weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

17,986

 

 

17,856

 

 

17,645

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

7,039

 

 

2,101

 

 

2,116

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

8,218

 

 

13,156

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average units outstanding (in thousands)

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common units public

 

 

17,995

 

 

17,864

 

 

17,657

Common units Höegh LNG

 

 

7,039

 

 

2,101

 

 

2,116

Subordinated units Höegh LNG

 

 

8,218

 

 

13,156

 

 

13,156

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per unit (2):

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Common unit public

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.93

 

$

1.37

Common unit Höegh LNG (3)

 

$

1.84

 

$

2.03

 

$

1.44

Subordinated unit Höegh LNG (3)

 

$

0.70

 

$

2.03

 

$

1.45


(1)

Includes all distributions paid or to be paid in relationship to the period, regardless of whether the declaration and payment dates were prior to the end of the period and is based the number of units outstanding at the period end.

(2)

Effective March 21, 2019, granted 10,917 phantom units to the CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective March 23, 2018, the Partnership granted 14,584 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Effective June 3, 2016, the Partnership granted 21,500 phantom units to the then-serving CEO/CFO of the Partnership. One-third of such phantom units vest as of December 31, 2017, November 30, 2018 and November 30, 2019, respectively. On September 14, 2018, the plan was amended to extend the terms and conditions of such unvested units for the grants effective March 23, 2017 and June 3, 2016 of the then-serving CEO/CFO that resigned as CEO/CFO of the Partnership. The phantom units impact the diluted weighted average units outstanding.

(3)

Includes total amounts attributable to incentive distributions rights of $1,597,  $1,591 and $1,141 for the years ended December 31, 2019,  2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $908,  $219 and $158 was attributed to common units owned by Höegh LNG and $688,  $1,372 and $983 was attributed to subordinated units owned by Höegh LNG, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(4)

On August 16, 2019, all subordinated units converted into common units on a one-for-one basis.

v3.20.1
Significant accounting policies - Additional information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 01, 2019
Jan. 01, 2019
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 01, 2017
Jan. 31, 2017
Jan. 03, 2017
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 385,000              
Lease, Practical Expedients, Package [true false] true              
Lease, Practical Expedient, Use of Hindsight [true false] true              
Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset $ 91   $ 150          
Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset, Statement of Financial Position [Extensible List] Due from Joint Ventures, Noncurrent              
Operating Lease, Liability $ 91   $ 150          
Operating Lease, Liability, Statement of Financial Position [Extensible List] Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities, Current Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities, Current Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities, Current          
Goodwill $ 251 $ 251     $ 251      
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Noncontrolling Owners           49.00%   49.00%
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired         49.00% 49.00% 51.00% 51.00%
Neptune And Cape Ann [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00% 50.00%     50.00%      
Above Market Leases [Member] | Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life 9 years 6 months              
Above Market Leases [Member] | Hoegh Gallant [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life 3 years 4 months 24 days              
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 85,000              
$385 Million Facility [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 385,000              
Vessels [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 35 years              
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Advances to Affiliate $ 800 $ 700            
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00%              
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd [Member] | Variable Interest Entity, Primary Beneficiary [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Net assets (liabilities) $ 700 (2,000)            
Hoegh Grace                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 10 years              
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Advances to Affiliate $ 3,000 2,800            
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00%              
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member] | Variable Interest Entity, Primary Beneficiary [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Net assets (liabilities) $ 2,600 (800)            
PT Hoegh LNG Lampung [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Restricted Net Assets $ 169,800 $ 164,400            
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life 20 years              
Variable Interest Entity, Qualitative or Quantitative Information, Ownership Percentage 100.00%              
Statutory reserve on paid up capital, Percentage 20.00% 20.00%            
Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Restricted Net Assets $ 0 $ 4,600            
Variable Interest Entity, Qualitative or Quantitative Information, Ownership Percentage 100.00%              
Hoegh Lng Colombia Ltd [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Restricted Net Assets $ 0 $ 200            
Variable Interest Entity, Qualitative or Quantitative Information, Ownership Percentage 100.00%              
Hoegh Lng Colombia Ltd [Member] | Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Noncontrolling Owners           49.00%    
Accounting Standards Update 2016-02 [Member]                
Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]                
Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset $ 100     $ 150        
Operating Lease, Liability $ 100     $ 150        
v3.20.1
Financial income (expense), net (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Financial income (expense), net  
Schedule of financial income expense

The components of financial income (expense), net are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Interest income

 

$

947

 

725

 

$

500

Interest expense:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Interest expense

 

 

(24,950)

 

(26,077)

 

 

(28,280)

Commitment fees

 

 

(381)

 

(37)

 

 

(977)

Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed

 

 

(2,361)

 

(700)

 

 

(828)

Total interest expense

 

 

(27,692)

 

(26,814)

 

 

(30,085)

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,030

 

 —

 

 

 —

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

 —

 

4,681

 

 

2,463

Other items, net:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

 

 

(396)

 

(193)

 

 

(968)

Bank charges, fees and other

 

 

(297)

 

(143)

 

 

(107)

Withholding tax on interest expense and other

 

 

(2,882)

 

(2,571)

 

 

(2,499)

Total other items, net

 

 

(3,575)

 

(2,907)

 

 

(3,574)

Total financial income (expense), net

 

$

(29,290)

 

(24,315)

 

$

(30,696)

 

v3.20.1
Significant accounting policies (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Significant accounting policies  
Schedule of contract related intangibles and their useful lives

The contract related intangibles and their useful lives as of the acquisition dates, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Useful life

Intangible category

    

(Years)

Above market time charter Höegh Gallant

 

3.4

Option for time charter extension Höegh Gallant

 

5.3

Above market time charter Höegh Grace

 

9.5

 

v3.20.1
Subsequent events
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Subsequent events  
Subsequent events

23.   Subsequent events

On February 15, 2020, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $15.0 million, or $0.44 per common unit, with respect to the three months ended December 31, 2019, equivalent to $1.76 per unit on an annualized basis.

On February 17, 2020, the Partnership paid a cash distribution of $3.7 million, or $0.546875 per Series A preferred unit, for the period commencing on November 15, 2019 to February 14, 2020.

On February 27, 2020, the Partnership exercised the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025. The Partnership intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors.

 

On March 26, 2020, the Partnership granted 8,100 phantom units to the CEO & CFO of the Partnership. One third of such phantom units vest as of November 30, 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively.

 

After the balance sheet date, we have seen significant macroeconomic uncertainty as a result of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. The scale and duration of this development remains uncertain and could materially impact our earnings and cash flow.

 

On April 1, 2020, the joint ventures and the charterer signed final settlement and release agreements related to the boil-off claim. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 18 for additional information on the terms of the settlement.

v3.20.1
Segment information
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Segment information  
Segment information

4.   Segment information

There are two operating segments. The segment profit measure is Segment EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and impairment, and other financial items (gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other items, net). Segment EBITDA is reconciled to operating income and net income in the segment presentation below. The two segments are “Majority held FSRUs” and “Joint venture FSRUs.” In addition, unallocated corporate costs, interest income from advances to joint ventures and interest expense related to the outstanding balance on the $85 million revolving credit facility, the $385 million facility, and the seller’s credit note, repaid in October 2017, are included in “Other.”

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Majority held FSRUs includes the financing lease related to the PGN FSRU Lampung and the operating leases related to the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Joint venture FSRUs include two 50% owned FSRUs, the Neptune and the Cape Ann, that operate under long term time charters with one charterer.

The accounting policies applied to the segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements, except that i) Joint venture FSRUs are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note and under equity accounting for the consolidated financial statements, ii) internal interest income and interest expense between the Partnership’s subsidiaries that eliminate in consolidation are not included in the segment columns for the other financial income (expense), net line and iii) non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is subtracted in the segment note to reflect the Partnership’s interest in Segment EBITDA as the Partnership’s segment profit measure, Segment EBITDA. Under the proportional consolidation method, 50% of the Joint venture FSRUs’ revenues, expenses and assets are reflected in the segment note. Management monitors the results of operations of joint ventures under the proportional consolidation method and not the equity method of accounting. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership began consolidating its acquired 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Since the Partnership obtained control of the Höegh Grace entities on that date, it consolidated 100% of the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of the Höegh Grace entities and the interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity under US GAAP. Management monitored the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities based on the Partnership’s  51% interest in Segment EBITDA of such entities and, therefore, subtracted the non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to present Segment EBITDA. The adjustment to non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is reversed to reconcile to operating income and net income in the segment presentation. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

In time charters, the charterer, not the Partnership, controls the choice of locations or routes the FSRUs serve. Accordingly, the presentation of information by geographical region is not meaningful. The following tables include the results for the segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

    

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

145,321

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,754

 

(42,433)

(1)  

$

145,321

Other revenue

 

 

115

 

 —

 

 —

 

115

 

 

(1)  

 

115

Total revenues

 

 

145,436

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,869

 

 

  

 

145,436

Operating expenses (2)

 

 

(34,266)

 

(9,044)

 

(6,465)

 

(49,775)

 

9,044

(1)  

 

(40,731)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,078

(1)  

 

6,078

Segment EBITDA

 

 

111,170

 

33,389

 

(6,465)

 

138,094

 

  

  

 

  

Depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

 

(21,477)

 

(10,030)

 

 —

 

(31,507)

 

10,030

(1)  

 

(21,477)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

89,693

 

23,359

 

(6,465)

 

106,587

 

 

  

 

89,306

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,030

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,030

 

 

(1)  

 

1,030

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

 —

 

(5,209)

 

 —

 

(5,209)

 

5,209

(1)  

 

 —

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(12,511)

 

(12,072)

 

(17,809)

 

(42,392)

 

12,072

(1)  

 

(30,320)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

78,212

 

6,078

 

(24,274)

 

60,016

 

 —

 

 

60,016

Income tax expense

 

 

(7,278)

 

 —

 

 3

 

(7,275)

 

 —

 

 

(7,275)

Net income (loss)

 

$

70,934

 

6,078

 

(24,271)

 

52,741

 

 —

 

$

52,741

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

13,850

(3)  

 

13,850

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

70,934

 

6,078

 

(24,271)

 

52,741

 

(13,850)

(3)  

$

38,891


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.

(2)

The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary was assessed a property tax and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was as a result of the issuance of a new regulation in 2019, defining FSRUs as subject to the existing Indonesian property tax law.  The property tax and penalties were recorded as a component of vessel operating expenses.

(3)

Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

    

reporting

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

$

640,431

 

252,789

 

 —

 

893,220

 

(252,789)

(1)  

$

640,431

Net investment in financing lease

 

 

278,904

 

 —

 

 —

 

278,904

 

 —

 

 

278,904

Goodwill

 

 

251

 

 —

 

 —

 

251

 

 —

 

 

251

Advances to joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,831

 

3,831

 

 —

 

 

3,831

Total assets

 

 

996,201

 

284,174

 

16,599

 

1,296,974

 

(284,174)

(1)  

 

1,012,800

Accumulated earnings of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

50

 

50

 

3,220

(1)  

 

3,270

Expenditures for vessels & equipment

 

 

211

 

195

 

 —

 

406

 

(195)

(2)  

 

211

Expenditures for drydocking

 

 

3,107

 

913

 

 —

 

4,020

 

(913)

(2)  

 

3,107

Impairment/retirement of equipment

 

 

 —

 

(75)

 

 —

 

(75)

 

75

(2)  

 

 —

Principal repayment financing lease

 

 

4,168

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,168

 

 —

 

 

4,168

Amortization of above market contract

 

$

3,631

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,631

 

 —

 

$

3,631


(1)

Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated earnings of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

144,952

 

43,169

 

 

188,121

 

(43,169)

(1)

$

144,952

Other revenue

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

1,609

 

 

(1)

 

1,609

Total revenues

 

 

146,561

 

43,169

 

 

189,730

 

 

 

 

146,561

Operating expenses

 

 

(27,294)

 

(10,932)

 

(5,817)

 

(44,043)

 

10,932

(1)

 

(33,111)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,938

(1)

 

17,938

Segment EBITDA

 

 

119,267

 

32,237

 

(5,817)

 

145,687

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(21,146)

 

(9,725)

 

 

(30,871)

 

9,725

(1)

 

(21,146)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

98,121

 

22,512

 

(5,817)

 

114,816

 

 

 

 

110,242

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

4,681

 

8,496

 

 

13,177

 

(8,496)

(1)

 

4,681

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(26,381)

 

(13,070)

 

(2,615)

 

(42,066)

 

13,070

(1)

 

(28,996)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

76,421

 

17,938

 

(8,432)

 

85,927

 

 

 

85,927

Income tax expense

 

 

(8,253)

 

 

(52)

 

(8,305)

 

 

 

(8,305)

Net income (loss)

 

$

68,168

 

17,938

 

(8,484)

 

77,622

 

 

$

77,622

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,303

(2)

 

12,303

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

68,168

 

17,938

 

(8,484)

 

77,622

 

(12,303)

(2)

$

65,319


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

$

658,311

 

261,614

 

 —

 

919,925

 

(261,614)

(1)

$

658,311

Net investment in financing lease

 

 

283,073

 

 —

 

 —

 

283,073

 

 —

 

 

283,073

Goodwill

 

 

251

 

 —

 

 —

 

251

 

 —

 

 

251

Advances to joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,536

 

3,536

 

 —

 

 

3,536

Total assets

 

 

1,007,202

 

286,283

 

15,838

 

1,309,323

 

(286,283)

(1)

 

1,023,040

Accumulated losses of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

50

 

50

 

(2,858)

(1)

 

(2,808)

Expenditures for vessels & equipment

 

 

257

 

3,305

 

 —

 

3,562

 

(3,305)

(2)

 

257

Expenditures for drydocking

 

 

 —

 

2,490

 

 —

 

2,490

 

(2,490)

(2)

 

 —

Principal repayment financing lease

 

 

3,814

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,814

 

 —

 

 

3,814

Amortization of above market contract

 

$

3,631

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,631

 

 —

 

$

3,631


(1)

Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated losses of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

143,531

 

42,165

 

 —

 

185,696

 

(42,165)

(1)

$

143,531

Accrual historical boil-off claim

 

 

 —

 

(11,850)

 

 —

 

(11,850)

 

11,850

(1)(2)

 

 —

Total revenues

 

 

143,531

 

30,315

 

 —

 

173,846

 

 

  

 

143,531

Operating expenses

 

 

(27,612)

 

(8,628)

 

(6,089)

 

(42,329)

 

8,628

(1)

 

(33,701)

Construction contract expenses

 

 

(151)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(151)

 

 

(3)

 

(151)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

5,139

(1)

 

5,139

Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA

 

 

(19,210)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(19,210)

 

19,210

(4)

 

 —

Segment EBITDA

 

 

96,558

 

21,687

 

(6,089)

 

112,156

 

  

  

 

  

Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA

 

 

19,210

 

 —

 

 —

 

19,210

 

(19,210)

(4)

 

 —

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(21,054)

 

(9,815)

 

 —

 

(30,869)

 

9,815

(1)

 

(21,054)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

94,714

 

11,872

 

(6,089)

 

100,497

 

 

  

 

93,764

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

2,463

 

7,194

 

 —

 

9,657

 

(7,194)

(1)

 

2,463

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(29,656)

 

(13,927)

 

(3,503)

 

(47,086)

 

13,927

(1)

 

(33,159)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

67,521

 

5,139

 

(9,592)

 

63,068

 

 —

 

 

63,068

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

(3,893)

 

 —

 

15

 

(3,878)

 

 —

 

 

(3,878)

Net income (loss)

 

$

63,628

 

5,139

 

(9,577)

 

59,190

 

 —

 

$

59,190

Non-controlling interest in net income

 

 

10,408

 

 —

 

 —

 

10,408

 

 

  

 

10,408

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

2,480

(5)

 

2,480

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

53,220

 

5,139

 

(9,577)

 

48,782

 

(2,480)

(5)

$

46,302


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional consolidation amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (loss) of joint ventures.

(2)

For additional information, refer to note 18 under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.”

(3)

The warranty work for the Mooring was completed in 2017 resulting in additional expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(4)

Eliminations reverse the adjustment to Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA included for Segment EBITDA and the adjustment to reverse the Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to reconcile to operating income and net income.

(5)

Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the percentage of consolidated total revenues from the following customers accounted for over 10% of the Partnership’s consolidated total revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

PT PGN LNG Indonesia

 

33

%  

33

%  

33

%

Höegh LNG Egypt LLC

 

31

%  

31

%  

31

%

Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P.

 

36

%  

36

%  

36

%

 

v3.20.1
Prepaid expenses and other receivables
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Prepaid expenses and other receivables  
Prepaid expenses and other receivables

8.   Prepaid expenses and other receivables

The components of prepaid expenses and other receivables are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Refundable value added tax on import

 

$

 —

 

$

2,517

Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

 

2,534

 

 

450

Total other prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

$

2,534

 

$

2,967

 

Refundable value added tax was paid in Indonesia in local currency on the import of PGN FSRU Lampung into the country in 2014. The receivable was recovered by applying subsequent periods net value added tax liabilities against the receivable. As of December 31, 2019, the refundable balance was fully recovered. The charterer provided an advance for the funding of the refundable value added tax on import. Refer to note 14.

v3.20.1
Intangibles and goodwill
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Intangibles and goodwill  
Intangibles and goodwill

12.   Intangibles and goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Option

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

Above

 

for time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

market time

 

charter

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

charter

    

extension

    

Intangibles

    

Goodwill

    

Total

Historical cost December 31, 2017

 

$

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

$

31,011

Amortization for the year

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2018

 

 

(10,272)

 

 —

 

(10,272)

 

 —

 

 

(10,272)

Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2018

 

 

12,488

 

8,000

 

20,488

 

251

 

 

20,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

 

31,011

Additions

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

Historical cost December 31, 2019

 

 

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

 

31,011

Amortization for the year

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2019

 

 

(13,903)

 

 —

 

(13,903)

 

 —

 

 

(13,903)

Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2019

 

$

8,857

 

8,000

 

16,857

 

251

 

$

17,108

 

The following table presents estimated future amortization expense for the intangibles:

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Total

2020

 

$

3,053

2021

 

 

2,755

2022

 

 

2,755

2023

 

 

2,755

2024

 

 

2,762

2025 and thereafter

 

$

2,777

 

v3.20.1
Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Financial Instruments  
Financial Instruments

16.   Financial Instruments

Fair value measurements

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition – The fair value of the cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash approximates its carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets.

Amounts due from (to) owners and affiliates – The fair value of the non-interest bearing receivables or payables approximates their carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets since the receivables or payables are to be settled consistent with trade receivables and payables.

Derivative instruments – The fair values of the interest rates swaps are estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the relevant LIBOR interest rate curves, adjusted for the subsidiary’s credit worthiness and the credit worthiness of the counterparty to the derivative.

Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures – The fair values of the fixed rate subordinated shareholder loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the joint ventures.

Lampung, Gallant, Grace and $385 million facilities – The fair values of the variable rate debt are estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the estimated currently available margins and LIBOR interest rates as of the balance sheet date for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the Partnership.

Revolving credit due to owners and affiliates – The fair value of the variable rate debt is estimated based on the present value of cash flows over the term of the instruments based on the estimated currently available margins and LIBOR interest rates as of the balance sheet date for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities and the current credit worthiness of the Partnership.

The fair value estimates are categorized by a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table includes the estimated fair value and carrying value of those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, as well as the estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are not accounted for at a fair value on a recurring basis. Trade payables and receivables for which the estimated fair values are equivalent to carrying values are not specified below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

amount

 

value

 

amount

 

value

 

 

 

 

Asset

 

Asset

 

Asset

 

Asset

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Level

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

Recurring:

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 1

 

$

39,126

 

39,126

 

26,326

 

$

26,326

Restricted cash

 

 1

 

 

20,693

 

20,693

 

19,128

 

 

19,128

Derivative instruments

 

 2

 

 

(14,935)

 

(14,935)

 

(1,498)

 

 

(1,498)

Other:

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amounts due from affiliate

 

 2

 

 

4,296

 

4,296

 

4,328

 

 

4,328

Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures

 

 2

 

 

3,831

 

4,029

 

3,536

 

 

3,579

Current amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 2

 

 

(2,513)

 

(2,513)

 

(2,301)

 

 

(2,301)

Lampung facility

 

 2

 

 

(112,713)

 

(119,598)

 

(130,275)

 

 

(142,087)

Gallant facility

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(140,812)

 

 

(141,538)

Grace facility

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(164,458)

 

 

(164,210)

$385 million facility

 

 2

 

 

(344,248)

 

(352,219)

 

 —

 

 

 —

Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates

 

 2

 

$

(8,792)

 

(8,717)

 

(39,292)

 

$

(38,999)

 

Financing Receivables

The following table contains a summary of the loan receivables by type of borrower and the method by which the credit quality is monitored on a quarterly basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class of Financing Receivables

 

Credit Quality

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Indicator

    

Grade

    

2019

    

2018

Trade receivable

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

$

735

 

$

1,228

Amounts due from affiliate

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

 

4,296

 

 

4,328

Advances/ loans to joint ventures

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

$

3,831

 

$

3,536

 

The shareholder loans to joint ventures are classified as advances to joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheet. Refer to note 10.

v3.20.1
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units  
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units

20.   Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units

From the commencement of the Prior ATM program in January 2018 through December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 2,025,590. Series A preferred units and 306,266 common units and received net proceeds of $51.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The compensation paid to the Agent for such sales was $1.0 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 53,160 common units at an average gross sales price of $19.6 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $1.0 million. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Partnership sold 496,520 Series A preferred units at an average gross sales price of $26.79 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $13.1 million. The Partnership has paid an aggregate of $0.2 million in sales commissions to the Agent in connection with such sales for the period ended December 31, 2019. Proceeds in the table below are included for all units issued for the year ended December 31, 2019.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Common units

    

Units

    

Total

Gross proceeds for units issued

 

$

1,042

 

13,298

 

$

14,340

Less: Commissions

 

 

(13)

 

(233)

 

 

(246)

Net proceeds for units issued

 

$

1,029

 

13,065

 

$

14,094

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership sold 253,106 common units at an average gross sales price of $18.26 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $4.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Partnership sold 1,529,070 Series A preferred units at an average gross sales price of $25.74 per unit for net proceeds, after sales commissions, of $38.7 million. The Partnership has paid an aggregate of $0.8 million in sales commissions to the Agent in connection with such sales for the period ended December 31, 2018. Proceeds in the table below are included for all units issued for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Common units

    

Preferred Units

    

Total

Gross proceeds for units issued

 

$

4,623

 

39,360

 

$

43,983

Less: Commissions

 

 

(60)

 

(701)

 

 

(761)

Net proceeds for units issued

 

$

4,563

 

38,659

 

$

43,222

 

On October 5, 2017, the Partnership issued 4,600,000 8.75% Series A preferred units. The offering price was $25.0 per unit. The Partnership’s total proceeds and net proceeds from the preferred unit offering were $115.0 million and $110.9 million, respectively. During October 2017, net proceeds of $34.4 million and $24.3 million were used to repay outstanding balances under the seller’s credit note and revolving credit facility, respectively. During December 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and settled part of the purchase price with cash of $45.3 million from the issuance of the Series A preferred units.

8.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

December 31, 2017

Gross proceeds received

 

$

115,000

Less: Underwriters' discount

 

 

(3,623)

Less: Offering expenses

 

 

(453)

Net proceeds received

 

$

110,924

 

v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Parenthetical) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Statement of Cash Flows [Abstract]        
Cash and cash equivalents $ 39,126 $ 26,326 $ 22,679 $ 18,915
Restricted cash - current asset 8,066 6,003 6,962 8,055
Restricted cash - non-current asset 12,627 13,125 13,640 14,154
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 59,819 $ 45,454 $ 43,281 $ 41,124
v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Current assets    
Cash and cash equivalents $ 39,126 $ 26,326
Restricted cash 8,066 6,003
Trade receivables 735 1,228
Amounts due from affiliates 4,296 4,328
Inventory 463 646
Current portion of net investment in direct financing lease 4,551 4,168
Derivative instruments 0 1,199
Prepaid expenses and other receivables 2,534 2,967
Total current assets 59,771 46,865
Long-term assets    
Restricted cash 12,627 13,125
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 3,270 0
Advances to joint ventures 3,831 3,536
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 640,431 658,311
Other equipment 256 445
Intangibles and goodwill 17,108 20,739
Net investment in direct financing lease 274,353 278,905
Long-term deferred tax asset 217 174
Other long-term assets 936 940
Total long-term assets 953,029 976,175
Total assets 1,012,800 1,023,040
Current liabilities    
Current portion of long-term debt 44,660 45,458
Trade payables 533 529
Amounts due to owners and affiliates 2,513 2,301
Value added and withholding tax liability 1,476 1,175
Derivative instruments 2,907 259
Accrued liabilities and other payables 11,164 7,458
Total current liabilities 63,253 57,180
Long-term liabilities    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures 0 2,808
Long-term debt 412,301 390,087
Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates 8,792 39,292
Derivative instruments 12,028 2,438
Long-term tax liability 2,283 1,725
Long-term deferred tax liability 12,549 8,974
Other long-term liabilities 84 99
Total long-term liabilities 448,037 445,423
Total liabilities 511,290 502,603
EQUITY    
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (17,943) (5,337)
Total partners' capital 501,510 520,437
Total equity 501,510 520,437
Total liabilities and equity 1,012,800 1,023,040
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]    
EQUITY    
Total partners' capital 164,482 151,259
Total equity 164,482 151,259
Common units public [Member]    
EQUITY    
Total partners' capital 315,176 325,250
Total equity 315,176 325,250
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]    
EQUITY    
Total partners' capital 39,795 6,844
Total equity 39,795 6,844
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]    
EQUITY    
Total partners' capital 0 42,421
Total equity $ 0 $ 42,421
v3.20.1
Segment information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Time charter revenues $ 145,321 $ 144,952 $ 143,531
Other revenue 115 1,609 0
Accrual historical boil-off claim     0
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531
Operating expenses (40,731) (33,111) (33,701)
Construction contract expenses 0 0 (151)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Segment EBITDA 0 0 0
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Depreciation, amortization and impairment (21,477) (21,146) (21,054)
Operating income (loss) 89,306 110,242 93,764
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 1,030 0 0
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 4,681 2,463
Other financial income (expense), net (30,320) (28,996) (33,159)
Income (loss) before tax 60,016 85,927 63,068
Income tax benefit (expense) (7,275) (8,305) (3,878)
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 13,850 12,303 2,480
Non-controlling interest in net income 0 0 10,408
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) 38,891 65,319 46,302
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 640,431 658,311  
Net investment in financing lease 278,904 283,073  
Goodwill 251 251 251
Advances to joint ventures 3,831 3,536  
Total assets 1,012,800 1,023,040  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 3,270 0  
Accumulated losses of joint ventures 0 (2,808)  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment 211 257  
Expenditures for drydocking 3,107 0  
Impairment/retirement of equipment 0    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 4,168 3,814  
Amortization of above market contract 3,631 3,631 3,631
Majority Held FSRUs      
Time charter revenues 145,321 144,952 143,531
Other revenue 115 1,609  
Accrual historical boil-off claim     0
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531
Operating expenses (34,266) (27,294) (27,612)
Construction contract expenses     (151)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 0 0 0
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     (19,210)
Segment EBITDA 111,170 119,267 96,558
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     19,210
Depreciation, amortization and impairment (21,477) (21,146) (21,054)
Operating income (loss) 89,693 98,121 94,714
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 1,030    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 4,681 2,463
Other financial income (expense), net (12,511) (26,381) (29,656)
Income (loss) before tax 78,212 76,421 67,521
Income tax benefit (expense) (7,278) (8,253) (3,893)
Net income (loss) 70,934 68,168 63,628
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 0 0 0
Non-controlling interest in net income     10,408
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) 70,934 68,168 53,220
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 640,431 658,311  
Net investment in financing lease 278,904 283,073  
Goodwill 251 251  
Advances to joint ventures 0 0  
Total assets 996,201 1,007,202  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 0    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   0  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment 211 257  
Expenditures for drydocking 3,107 0  
Impairment/retirement of equipment 0    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 4,168 3,814  
Amortization of above market contract 3,631 3,631  
Joint Venture FSRUs      
Time charter revenues 42,433 43,169 42,165
Other revenue 0 0  
Accrual historical boil-off claim     (11,850)
Total revenues 42,433 43,169 30,315
Operating expenses (9,044) (10,932) (8,628)
Construction contract expenses     0
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 0 0 0
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Segment EBITDA 33,389 32,237 21,687
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Depreciation, amortization and impairment (10,030) (9,725) (9,815)
Operating income (loss) 23,359 22,512 11,872
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 0    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments (5,209) 8,496 7,194
Other financial income (expense), net (12,072) (13,070) (13,927)
Income (loss) before tax 6,078 17,938 5,139
Income tax benefit (expense) 0 0 0
Net income (loss) 6,078 17,938 5,139
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 0 0 0
Non-controlling interest in net income     0
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) 6,078 17,938 5,139
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 252,789 261,614  
Net investment in financing lease 0 0  
Goodwill 0 0  
Advances to joint ventures 0 0  
Total assets 284,174 286,283  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 0    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   0  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment 195 3,305  
Expenditures for drydocking 913 2,490  
Impairment/retirement of equipment (75)    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 0 0  
Amortization of above market contract 0 0  
Other      
Time charter revenues 0 0 0
Other revenue 0 0  
Accrual historical boil-off claim     0
Total revenues 0 0 0
Operating expenses (6,465) (5,817) (6,089)
Construction contract expenses     0
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 0 0 0
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Segment EBITDA (6,465) (5,817) (6,089)
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     0
Depreciation, amortization and impairment 0 0 0
Operating income (loss) (6,465) (5,817) (6,089)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 0    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 0 0
Other financial income (expense), net (17,809) (2,615) (3,503)
Income (loss) before tax (24,274) (8,432) (9,592)
Income tax benefit (expense) 3 (52) 15
Net income (loss) (24,271) (8,484) (9,577)
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 0 0 0
Non-controlling interest in net income     0
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) (24,271) (8,484) (9,577)
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 0 0  
Net investment in financing lease 0 0  
Goodwill 0 0  
Advances to joint ventures 3,831 3,536  
Total assets 16,599 15,838  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 50    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   50  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment 0 0  
Expenditures for drydocking 0 0  
Impairment/retirement of equipment 0    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 0 0  
Amortization of above market contract 0 0  
Total Segment reporting      
Time charter revenues 187,754 188,121 185,696
Other revenue 115 1,609  
Accrual historical boil-off claim     (11,850)
Total revenues 187,869 189,730 173,846
Operating expenses (49,775) (44,043) (42,329)
Construction contract expenses     (151)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 0 0 0
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     (19,210)
Segment EBITDA 138,094 145,687 112,156
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     19,210
Depreciation, amortization and impairment (31,507) (30,871) (30,869)
Operating income (loss) 106,587 114,816 100,497
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 1,030    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments (5,209) 13,177 9,657
Other financial income (expense), net (42,392) (42,066) (47,086)
Income (loss) before tax 60,016 85,927 63,068
Income tax benefit (expense) (7,275) (8,305) (3,878)
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 0 0 0
Non-controlling interest in net income     10,408
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 48,782
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 893,220 919,925  
Net investment in financing lease 278,904 283,073  
Goodwill 251 251  
Advances to joint ventures 3,831 3,536  
Total assets 1,296,974 1,309,323  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 50    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   50  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment 406 3,562  
Expenditures for drydocking 4,020 2,490  
Impairment/retirement of equipment (75)    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 4,168 3,814  
Amortization of above market contract 3,631 3,631  
Eliminations      
Time charter revenues (42,433) (43,169) (42,165)
Other revenue 0 0  
Accrual historical boil-off claim     11,850
Total revenues (42,433) (43,169) 0
Operating expenses 9,044 10,932 8,628
Construction contract expenses     0
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139
Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     19,210
Segment EBITDA 0 0 0
Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA     (19,210)
Depreciation, amortization and impairment 10,030 9,725 9,815
Operating income (loss) 0 0 0
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 0    
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 5,209 (8,496) (7,194)
Other financial income (expense), net 12,072 13,070 13,927
Income (loss) before tax 0 0 0
Income tax benefit (expense) 0 0 0
Net income (loss) 0 0 0
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 13,850 12,303 2,480
Non-controlling interest in net income     0
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) (13,850) (12,303) $ (2,480)
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation (252,789) (261,614)  
Net investment in financing lease 0 0  
Goodwill 0 0  
Advances to joint ventures 0 0  
Total assets (284,174) (286,283)  
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 3,220    
Accumulated losses of joint ventures   (2,858)  
Expenditures for vessels & equipment (195) (3,305)  
Expenditures for drydocking (913) (2,490)  
Impairment/retirement of equipment 75    
Principal repayment direct financing lease 0 0  
Amortization of above market contract $ 0 $ 0  
v3.20.1
Common, subordinated and preferred units - Additional information (Details) - $ / shares
Oct. 05, 2022
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Series A Preferred Stock [Member] | Scenario, Forecast [Member]          
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]          
Preferred Stock, Liquidation Preference Per Share $ 25.00        
Preferred Stock, Redemption Price Per Share $ 25.00        
Preferred stock distribution rate, Percentage 8.75%        
Partners Capital Distribution Amount Per Unit $ 2.1875        
Preferred Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share $ 25.00        
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]          
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]          
Partners Capital Account, Units   15,257,498 2,101,438 2,116,060 2,116,060
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]          
Common And Subordinated Units [Line Items]          
Partners Capital Account, Units     13,156,060 13,156,060  
v3.20.1
Related party transactions - Statement of income (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Revenues      
Time charter revenue Hegh Gallant $ 145,321 $ 144,952 $ 143,531
Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Hegh LNG 64 2,353 1,534
Operating expenses      
Vessel operating expenses (30,870) (24,195) (23,791)
Interest income from joint ventures 947 725 500
Interest expense and commitment fees to Hegh LNG (27,692) (26,814) (30,085)
Total 52,741 77,622 59,190
Hoegh LNG and Subsidiaries [Member]      
Revenues      
Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Hegh LNG     (2,496)
Operating expenses      
Vessel operating expenses (24,523) (21,520) (21,124)
Hours, travel expense and overhead and Board of Directors' fees (4,072) (3,671) (3,284)
Interest income from joint ventures 295 273 370
Interest expense and commitment fees to Hegh LNG (1,882) (2,938) (3,934)
Total 16,991 19,252 15,914
Hoegh Gallant [Member]      
Revenues      
Time charter revenue Hegh Gallant $ 47,173 $ 47,108 $ 46,382
v3.20.1
Related party transactions - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jun. 04, 2019
May 29, 2019
Mar. 21, 2019
Sep. 14, 2018
Jun. 06, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
May 22, 2017
Jan. 03, 2017
Jun. 03, 2016
Mar. 21, 2019
Mar. 23, 2018
Aug. 31, 2014
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Jan. 29, 2018
Dec. 01, 2017
Jan. 01, 2017
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Revolving Credit Due To Owners And Affiliates                         $ 8,792 $ 39,292        
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Paid                         73,804 72,497 $ 57,037      
Partners' Capital Account, Unit-based Compensation                         194 200 189      
Repayment of Indemnifications Received From Hoegh Lng                         64 2,353 $ 1,534      
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired           49.00%                 49.00%   49.00% 51.00%
Director [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Total Board of Directors' fees                         496 501 $ 467      
Partners' Capital Account, Unit-based Compensation                         $ 194 $ 200        
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer [Member] | Phantom Units [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Units granted     10,917 28,018         21,500 10,917 14,584              
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Debt, Weighted Average Interest Rate                         6.60% 6.30%        
Revolving Credit Due To Owners And Affiliates   $ 85,000                   $ 85,000 $ 85,000     $ 85,000    
Line of Credit Facility Original Expiration Date                       Jan. 01, 2020            
Line of Credit Facility, Expiration Date   Jan. 01, 2023                                
Hoegh LNG [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Indemnification Under the Omnibus Agreement                           $ 900 1,600      
Percentage Of Ownership Interest In Acquisition           49.00%   51.00%                    
Repayment of Indemnification Received from Hoegh Lng Revenue                             2,500      
Repayment of Indemnification Received from Hoegh Lng                         $ 100 2,400 1,500      
Hoegh LNG [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate                         1.40%          
Hoegh LNG [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility Maturing At 2020 [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate                         3.00%          
Hoegh LNG [Member] | Revolving Credit Facility Maturing At 2021 And Thereaftter[Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate                         4.00%          
Hoegh LNG and Subsidiaries [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Distribution Made to Limited Partner, Cash Distributions Paid                         $ 28,400 28,200 27,000      
Repayment of Indemnifications Received From Hoegh Lng                             (2,496)      
LP Long Term Incentive Plan [Member] | Director [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Partners' Capital Account, Units, Unit-based Compensation 11,180       11,050   9,805                      
Partners' Capital Account, Unit-based Compensation                         $ 194 200 189      
Egypt Co [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
Indemnification Under Technical Issues                           500 $ 500      
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member]                                    
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]                                    
indemnification received from HoeghLng                           $ 300        
v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances - Consolidated receivables between lease and service (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Time charter revenues and related contract balances    
Trade receivable for lease $ 2,898 $ 2,898
Trade receivable for time charter services 2,133 2,658
Total trade receivable and amounts due from affiliates $ 5,031 $ 5,556
v3.20.1
Schedule I -CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Total revenues $ 145,436 $ 146,561 $ 143,531
EXPENSES      
Administrative expenses (9,861) (8,916) (9,910)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139
Interest expense (27,692) (26,814) (30,085)
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190
Parent Company | Reportable Legal Entities      
Total revenues 0 0 0
EXPENSES      
Administrative expenses (6,473) (5,822) (8,608)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries 60,315 68,359 66,521
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139
Interest income 11,205 93 83
Interest expense (18,242) (2,938) (3,934)
Other items, net (142) (8) (11)
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190
Share of subsidiaries unrealized losses on cash flow hedges (12,217) (2,290) 3,335
Share of subsidiaries income tax benefit (389) (299) (347)
Comprehensive income $ 40,135 $ 75,033 $ 62,178
v3.20.1
Financial Instruments (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Financial Instruments  
Schedule of estimated fair value and carrying value of assets and liabilities

The following table includes the estimated fair value and carrying value of those assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, as well as the estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are not accounted for at a fair value on a recurring basis. Trade payables and receivables for which the estimated fair values are equivalent to carrying values are not specified below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

As of

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

Carrying

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

amount

 

value

 

amount

 

value

 

 

 

 

Asset

 

Asset

 

Asset

 

Asset

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Level

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

    

(Liability)

Recurring:

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 1

 

$

39,126

 

39,126

 

26,326

 

$

26,326

Restricted cash

 

 1

 

 

20,693

 

20,693

 

19,128

 

 

19,128

Derivative instruments

 

 2

 

 

(14,935)

 

(14,935)

 

(1,498)

 

 

(1,498)

Other:

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amounts due from affiliate

 

 2

 

 

4,296

 

4,296

 

4,328

 

 

4,328

Advances (shareholder loans) to joint ventures

 

 2

 

 

3,831

 

4,029

 

3,536

 

 

3,579

Current amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 2

 

 

(2,513)

 

(2,513)

 

(2,301)

 

 

(2,301)

Lampung facility

 

 2

 

 

(112,713)

 

(119,598)

 

(130,275)

 

 

(142,087)

Gallant facility

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(140,812)

 

 

(141,538)

Grace facility

 

 2

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

(164,458)

 

 

(164,210)

$385 million facility

 

 2

 

 

(344,248)

 

(352,219)

 

 —

 

 

 —

Revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates

 

 2

 

$

(8,792)

 

(8,717)

 

(39,292)

 

$

(38,999)

 

Summary of the loan receivables by type of borrower

The following table contains a summary of the loan receivables by type of borrower and the method by which the credit quality is monitored on a quarterly basis:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class of Financing Receivables

 

Credit Quality

 

 

 

As of December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Indicator

    

Grade

    

2019

    

2018

Trade receivable

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

$

735

 

$

1,228

Amounts due from affiliate

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

 

4,296

 

 

4,328

Advances/ loans to joint ventures

 

Payment activity

 

Performing

 

$

3,831

 

$

3,536

 

v3.20.1
Intangibles and goodwill (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Intangibles and goodwill  
Schedule of indefinite-lived intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Option

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

Above

 

for time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

market time

 

charter

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

charter

    

extension

    

Intangibles

    

Goodwill

    

Total

Historical cost December 31, 2017

 

$

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

$

31,011

Amortization for the year

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2018

 

 

(10,272)

 

 —

 

(10,272)

 

 —

 

 

(10,272)

Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2018

 

 

12,488

 

8,000

 

20,488

 

251

 

 

20,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

 

31,011

Additions

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

Historical cost December 31, 2019

 

 

22,760

 

8,000

 

30,760

 

251

 

 

31,011

Amortization for the year

 

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

(3,631)

 

 —

 

 

(3,631)

Accumulated amortization, December 31, 2019

 

 

(13,903)

 

 —

 

(13,903)

 

 —

 

 

(13,903)

Intangibles and goodwill, December 31, 2019

 

$

8,857

 

8,000

 

16,857

 

251

 

$

17,108

 

Schedule of estimated future amortization expense

The following table presents estimated future amortization expense for the intangibles:

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Total

2020

 

$

3,053

2021

 

 

2,755

2022

 

 

2,755

2023

 

 

2,755

2024

 

 

2,762

2025 and thereafter

 

$

2,777

 

v3.20.1
Prepaid expenses and other receivables (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Prepaid expenses and other receivables  
Schedule of prepaid expenses

The components of prepaid expenses and other receivables are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Refundable value added tax on import

 

$

 —

 

$

2,517

Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

 

2,534

 

 

450

Total other prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

$

2,534

 

$

2,967

 

v3.20.1
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Issuance of common units and Series A Preferred Units  
Schedule of proceeds received after issue of common units and preferred units in a public offering

 

 

Year ended

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Common units

    

Units

    

Total

Gross proceeds for units issued

 

$

1,042

 

13,298

 

$

14,340

Less: Commissions

 

 

(13)

 

(233)

 

 

(246)

Net proceeds for units issued

 

$

1,029

 

13,065

 

$

14,094

 


 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Common units

    

Preferred Units

    

Total

Gross proceeds for units issued

 

$

4,623

 

39,360

 

$

43,983

Less: Commissions

 

 

(60)

 

(701)

 

 

(761)

Net proceeds for units issued

 

$

4,563

 

38,659

 

$

43,222

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

December 31, 2017

Gross proceeds received

 

$

115,000

Less: Underwriters' discount

 

 

(3,623)

Less: Offering expenses

 

 

(453)

Net proceeds received

 

$

110,924

 

v3.20.1
Description of business - Additional information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Millions
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Dec. 01, 2017
Oct. 05, 2017
Jan. 03, 2017
Oct. 01, 2015
Aug. 12, 2014
Aug. 28, 2014
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Jan. 26, 2018
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Maximum Offering Amount                   $ 120.0
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Limited Partners Capital Account, Units Issued         13,156,060          
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Non Cancellable Lease Expiration Term                 10 years  
Lease Expiration Term                 10 years  
Lease Initial Term                 20 years  
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd | Maximum [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Lease Expiration Term                 15 years  
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd | Minimum [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Lease Expiration Term                 10 years  
Hoegh LNG Holdings Ltd [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Limited Partners Capital Account, Units Issued         2,116,060          
Percentage of incentive distribution rights         100.00%          
Percentage of Partnership Interest         58.00%          
Hoegh LNG Lampung Pte. Ltd [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest             100.00%      
Mitsui Osk Lines Ltd And Tokyo Lng Tanker Co [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage             50.00%      
Hoegh LNG Partners LP [Member] | Series A Preferred Stock [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Limited Partners Capital Account, Units Issued   4,600,000                
Proceeds from Issuance of Preferred Limited Partners Units   $ 110.9                
Preferred Stock, Dividend Rate, Percentage   8.75%                
Hoegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest 49.00%   51.00%           51.00%  
Percentage of Partnership Interest     51.00%              
Hoegh LNG FRSU III Ltd                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest       100.00%            
Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Ownership Interest By Private Equity Investors             49.00%      
Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao [Member] | Promigas S.a. Esp [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest             51.00%      
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Percentage of Partnership Interest     51.00%              
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Noncontrolling Owners 49.00%   49.00%              
Non Cancellable Lease Expiration Term                 10 years  
Lease Initial Term                 20 years  
Hoegh Grace entities [Member] | Maximum [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Lease Expiration Term               15 years    
Hoegh Grace entities [Member] | Minimum [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Lease Expiration Term               10 years    
IPO [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Exercise Of Option, Additional Common Units         1,440,000          
Limited Partners Capital Account, Units Issued         11,040,000          
Partners' Capital Account, Public Sale of Units Net of Offering Costs         $ 203.5          
Subsidiaries [Member] | Hoegh LNG Holdings Ltd [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Subsidiary of Limited Liability Company or Limited Partnership, Ownership Interest           100.00%        
Underwritten Public Offering [Member]                    
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]                    
Limited Partners Capital Account, Units Issued                 6,588,389  
Partners' Capital Account, Public Sale of Units Net of Offering Costs                 $ 111.5  
v3.20.1
Income tax - Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Deferred tax assets:    
Accrued liabilities and other payables $ 235 $ 196
Derivative instruments 565 954
Other equipment 9 9
Tax credits carried forward 1,818 1,626
Tax loss carryforward 57 53
Valuation allowance (57) (53)
Deferred tax liabilities:    
Accrued interest income (4,123) (3,837)
Accrued liabilities and other payables (385) (154)
Financing lease (10,451) (7,594)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net $ (12,332) $ (8,800)
v3.20.1
Supplemental cash flow information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities      
Non-cash expenditures for vessel and other equipment $ 0 $ (229) $ 0
Non-cash acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 41,362
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities      
Non-cash revolving credit facility draw for the acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Hegh Grace entities $ 0 $ 0 $ 41,362
v3.20.1
Vessels and other equipment - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 01, 2019
Jan. 01, 2019
Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset $ 91     $ 150  
Operating Lease, Liability 91     $ 150  
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross 716,672 $ 713,382 $ 713,125    
Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization, Property, Plant, and Equipment 76,241 55,071      
Depreciation 21,170 20,987      
Equipment [Member]          
Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross 845 817      
Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization, Property, Plant, and Equipment 679 372      
Depreciation 307 $ 159 $ 79    
Accounting Standards Update 2016-02 [Member]          
Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset 100       $ 150
Operating Lease, Liability $ 100       $ 150
v3.20.1
Investments in joint ventures - Additional Information (Details)
Dec. 31, 2019
SRV Joint Gas Ltd [Member]  
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00%
SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd [Member]  
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00%
v3.20.1
Financial income (expense), net (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Financial income (expense), net      
Interest income $ 947 $ 725 $ 500
Interest expense:      
Interest expense (24,950) (26,077) (28,280)
Commitment fees (381) (37) (977)
Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed (2,361) (700) (828)
Total interest expense (27,692) (26,814) (30,085)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 1,030 0 0
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 4,681 2,463
Other items, net:      
Foreign exchange gain (loss) (396) (193) (968)
Bank charges, fees and other (297) (143) (107)
Withholding tax on interest expense and other (2,882) (2,571) (2,499)
Total other items, net (3,575) (2,907) (3,574)
Total financial income (expense), net (29,290) $ (24,315) $ (30,696)
Debt Instrument Financial Covenants $ 385,000    
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Cash flow hedges relating to interest rate swaps are included in total gains (losses) (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments $ 0 $ 4,681 $ 2,463
Realized gains (losses) [Member]      
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments   0 0
Unrealized gains (losses) [Member]      
Total gains (losses) on derivative instruments   4,681 2,463
Interest rate swap [Member]      
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedge   (990) (2)
Amortization of amount excluded from hedge effectiveness   2,969 3,320
Reclassification discontinued hedge from OCI   3,557  
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income   $ (855) $ (855)
v3.20.1
Long-term debt - Principal on long-term debt outstanding (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]    
2020 $ 44,660  
2021 123,557  
2022 25,597  
2023 25,597  
2024 25,597  
2025 and thereafter 221,116  
Total $ 466,124 $ 440,244
v3.20.1
Investments in joint ventures - Investment method (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Investments in joint ventures    
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures $ 3,270 $ 0
Accumulated losses of joint ventures $ 0 $ (2,808)
v3.20.1
Advances to joint ventures
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Advances to joint ventures  
Advances to joint ventures

10.   Advances to joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Current portion of advances to joint ventures

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Long-term advances to joint ventures

 

 

3,831

 

 

3,536

Advances/shareholder loans to joint ventures

 

$

3,831

 

$

3,536

 

The Partnership had advances of $3.0 million and $2.8 million due from SRV Joint Gas Ltd. as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership had advances of $0.8 million and $0.7 million due from SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The advances consist of shareholder loans where the principal amounts, including accrued interest, are repaid based on available cash after servicing of long-term bank debt. The shareholder loans are due not later than the 12th anniversary of delivery date of each FSRU. The Neptune and the Cape Ann were delivered on November 30, 2009 and June 1, 2010, respectively. The shareholder loans are subordinated to long-term bank debt and the repayment plan is subject to quarterly discretionary revisions based on available cash after servicing of the long-term bank debt. Under terms of the shareholder loan agreements, the repayments shall be prioritized over any dividend payment to the owners of the joint ventures. The shareholder loans bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% per year. The other joint venture partners have, on a combined basis, an equal amount of shareholder loans outstanding at the same terms to each of the joint ventures.

The shareholder loans financed part of the construction of the vessels and operating expenses until the delivery and commencement of the operations of the Neptune and the Cape Ann. In 2011, the joint ventures began repaying principal and a portion of the interest expense based on available cash after servicing of the external debt. The quarterly payments have included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and a repayment of principal. Interest was accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment at the end of the loans after the original principal was fully repaid. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016 and all of the payments for the year ended December 31, 2017 represent payments of interest, including accrued interest to be repaid at the end of the loans.

As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures suspended payments on the shareholder loans pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Accordingly, the outstanding balance on the shareholder loans is classified as long-term as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Refer to note 18 under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.” The advances, including accrued interest, can be repaid based on available cash after servicing of long-term bank debt. There are no financial covenants in the joint ventures’ bank debt facilities, but certain other covenants and restrictions apply. Certain conditions apply to making distributions for the shareholder loans or dividends, including meeting a 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2019, both the 1.20 historical and projected debt service coverage ratios were met by the joint venture owning the Neptune. As a result, the joint venture owning the Neptune qualifies to make payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the 1.20 historical debt service coverage ratio was met, however, the projected debt service coverage ratio was not met by the joint venture owning the Cape Ann. As a result, no payments on the shareholder loans or other distributions can be made by joint venture owning the Cape Ann until the debt service coverage ratio is met in future periods.

v3.20.1
Significant accounting policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Significant accounting policies  
Significant accounting policies

2.   Significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.

It has been determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. are variable interest entities. A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is defined by US GAAP as a legal entity where either (a) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights, or (b) the equity holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and rewards. The guidance requires a VIE to be consolidated if any of its interest holders are entitled to a majority of the entity’s residual returns or are exposed to a majority of its expected losses.

Based upon the criteria set forth in US GAAP, the Partnership has determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a VIE, as the equity holders, through their equity investments, may not participate fully in the entity’s expected residual returns and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, the Partnership. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung are included in the consolidated financial statements. Dividends may only be paid if the retained earnings are positive and a statutory reserve has been established equal to 20% of its paid up capital under Indonesian law. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung had not established the required statutory reserves as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Therefore, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung cannot make dividend payments under Indonesian law. Under the Lampung facility, there are limitations on cash dividends and loans that can be made to the Partnership. Refer to note 13. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $169.8 million and $164.4 million, respectively.

The Partnership has determined that Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited is a VIE, as the equity investment does not provide sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without financial guarantees. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited are included in the consolidated financial statements. Under Cyprus law, dividends may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

The Partnership has also determined that Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. is a VIE since the entity would not be able to finance its activities without financial guarantees under its subsidiary’s facility to finance Höegh Grace. As of January 1, 2017, the Partnership became the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives the majority of the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and subsidiaries, are included in the consolidated financial statements with a non-controlling interest reflected for the minority share until December 1, 2017. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Under Cayman Islands law, dividends may only be paid out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distributions. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Dividends and other distributions from Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. may only be distributed if after the dividend payment, the Partnership would remain in compliance with the financial covenants under the $385 million facility. Refer to note 13.

In addition, the Partnership has determined that the two joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., are VIEs since each entity did not have a sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The entities have been financed with third party debt and subordinated shareholders loans. The Partnership is not the primary beneficiary, as the Partnership cannot make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIEs, but has joint control with the other equity holders. Therefore, the joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Partnership has significant influence. The Partnership’s carrying value is recorded in advances to joint ventures and accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheets. For SRV Joint Gas Ltd., the Partnership had a receivable for the advances of $3.0 million and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $2.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership’s accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2018. The Partnership’s carrying value for SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. consists of a receivable for the advances of $0.8 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership’s accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $2.0 million as of December 31, 2018. The major reasons that the Partnership had low accumulated earnings in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2019 and accumulated losses in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2018 was due to the fair value adjustments for the interest rate swaps recorded as liabilities on the balance sheets of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and eliminations for consolidation to the balance sheet. The maximum exposure to loss is the carrying value of the receivables, which is subordinated to the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, the investments in the joint ventures (accumulated earnings or losses), as the shares are pledged as security for the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, and Höegh LNG’s commitment under long-term bank loan agreements to fund its share of drydocking costs and remarketing efforts in the event of an early termination of the charters. If the charters terminate for any reason that does not result in a termination fee, the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt would be subject to mandatory repayment. Dividend distributions require a) agreement of the other joint venture owners; b) fulfilment of requirements of the long-term bank loans; c) and under Cayman Islands law may be paid out of profits or capital reserves subject to the joint venture being solvent after the distribution.

Significant accounting policies

Foreign currencies

The reporting currency in the consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of the FSRU-owning entities. Nearly all revenues are received in U.S. dollars and a majority of the Partnership’s expenditures for investments and all of the long-term debt are denominated in U.S. dollars. Transactions denominated in other currencies during the year are converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Resulting gains or losses are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Business combinations and asset acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under this method, the purchase price is allocated to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair values of net assets is recognized as goodwill. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. The results of entity acquired are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Dependent upon facts and circumstances, the assessment of a transaction may be considered the acquisition of an asset, when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, rather than a business combination. Asset acquisitions are accounted for by allocating the cost of the acquisition to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. Acquisition related costs are capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets acquired.

Time charter revenue, related contract balances and related expenses

Time charter revenues and related contract balances:

The Partnership is required to evaluate whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as a single contract, whether the contract promises to deliver more than one distinct good or service, or performance obligations, and/or a lease, determine the transaction price under the contract, allocate the transaction price to the lease and the performance obligations and recognize revenue as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Partnership believes the nature of its time charter contracts are the same, regardless of whether the contracts are accounted for as financing leases or operating leases for accounting purposes. As such, when adopting the revised guidance on leases as of January 1, 2019, the Partnership did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and services components for operating leases because this would result in inconsistent disclosure for the time charter contracts.

Performance obligations:

The Partnership determined that its time charter contracts contain a lease and a performance obligation for the provision of time charter services. The lease of the vessel, representing the use of the vessel without any associated performance obligations or warranties, is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 842; Leases.

The provision of time charter services, including guarantees for the level of performance provided by the time charter contracts, is considered a distinct service and is accounted for in accordance with the provision of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Partnership determined that the nature of the time charter services promised, represents a single performance obligation, to stand ready over a 24‑hour interval to accept LNG cargos, to transport cargos, to regasify the LNG and discharge the resulting gas into a pipeline in accordance with the charterer’s instructions and requirements.

Time charter services revenue can be recognized as the performance obligation is satisfied over the 24‑hour interval to the performance standards specified under the time charter contract. If the performance standards are not met, off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other performance payments may result.

Contract terms, determination of transaction price and allocation to performance obligations:

The Partnership’s time charter contracts for all FSRUs, except the Höegh Gallant, include day rates or hire rates and warranty provisions with the following components:

·

Fixed element: The fixed element is a fixed per day fee intended to cover remuneration for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

·

Operating expense reimbursement element: The operating expense reimbursement element is a rate per day intended to cover the operating costs of the vessel, including the crew, insurance, consumables, miscellaneous services, spares and maintenance and repairs costs and management services and fees. The amount of the operating expense reimbursement element may be based on actual cost incurred, or fees subject to indexing or other adjustments after a defined period, or a combination of both.

·

Tax reimbursement element: The tax reimbursement element may be a rate per day, based on the estimated liability for the year divided by the number of days in the year, subject to adjustment for actual taxes incurred, or a reimbursement of the costs as the taxes are incurred. The tax reimbursement element may cover withholding taxes, payroll taxes, other local taxes and current income tax expense for the jurisdiction in which the vessel operates as defined by the provisions of the individual time charter contract.

·

Performance warranties element: The performance warranties element includes defined operational capacity and standards that can result in the FSRUs being off-hire or require compensation to the charterer through provision of reduced hire, liquidated damages or performance payments. Examples of performance warranties include the ability to discharge regasified LNG at specified performance rates, guaranteed minimum fuel consumption, guaranteed minimum boil-off rates and the ability to accept cargos.

The Höegh Gallant has a single day rate intended to cover all of the elements listed above. In addition, the time charter contract for the Höegh Gallant includes a provision for 15 days of off-hire for scheduled maintenance. The joint ventures’ time charter contracts also provide for upfront payments for variable costs for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts.

The hire rates for the PGN FSRU Lampung and the joint ventures are invoiced at the beginning of the month. The Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace invoice time charter revenues monthly in arrears.

The transaction price is estimated as the standalone selling price for the lease and the time charter services components of the fixed day rate element. Variable consideration per day for operating expense and tax reimbursements is estimated at the most likely amount to which the Partnership is expected to be entitled to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty related to the variable consideration is resolved. When there is significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received, that variable consideration is considered constrained. Typically, variable reimbursements and performance warranties are known at the end of each 24‑hour interval, or as subsequently reassessed at the end of the reporting period. However, to the extent interpretations of contractual provisions are complex and/or disputed with the customer, this could give rise to constrained variable consideration. Constrained variable consideration is not estimated.

Variable consideration is allocated entirely to one performance obligation when the variable day rate relates specifically to the efforts to satisfy the single performance obligation. The default method of the relative standalone selling price method was used to allocate the remaining transaction price, principally the fixed element, between the lease and the time charter services. The total estimated transaction price for time charter services is considered variable consideration because it may be reduced by performance warranties.

The Partnership has made a policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a government entity on revenues and collected on behalf of that government entity from customers, such as sales or value added taxes.

Lease revenue recognition:

Leases are classified based upon defined criteria either as sale-type/direct financing leases (“financing leases”) or operating leases. A lease that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks of the FSRU to the charterer is accounted for as a financing lease by the lessor. All other leases that do not meet the criteria are classified as operating leases. On January 1, 2019, when adopting the revised leasing guidance, the Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and did not reassess conclusions under the previous standard about whether any existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. Accordingly, outstanding leases on January 1, 2019, continue to be classified in accordance with the prior lease guidance.

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as operating leases is recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the charter. The Höegh Gallant’s time charter, which had a five-year lease term at inception, is accounted for as an operating lease. The Höegh Grace’s time charter contracts, which have a non-cancellable charter period of ten years, are accounted for as an operating lease. Under one of the time charter contracts, the contract provides for additional variable payments, including a finance component, over the initial term depending upon the actual commencement date of the contract within a defined window of potential commencement dates. The variable payments are considered directly related to the lease performance obligation. The revenue, excluding the financing component, is recognized over the initial 10-year term. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for final income tax directly related to the provision of the lease is recorded as a component of lease revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as financing leases is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. Origination costs related to the time charter are a component of the net investment in financing lease and amortized over the lease term using the effective interest method. Financing leases are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investments in financing leases. The PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, which had a 20‑year lease term at inception, meets the criteria of transferring substantially all of the benefits and risks to the charterer and is accounted for as a financing lease.

Time charter services revenue recognition:

Variable consideration for the time charter services performance obligation, including amounts allocated to time charter services, estimated reimbursements for vessel operating expenses and estimated reimbursements of certain types of costs and taxes, are recognized as revenues as the performance obligation for the 24‑hour interval is fulfilled, subject to adjustment for off-hire and performance warranties. Constrained variable consideration is recognized as revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis when the significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received is resolved. Estimates for variable consideration, including constrained variable consideration, are reassessed at the end of each period. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes directly related to the provision of the time charter services are recorded as a component of time charter service revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Joint venture FSRUs lease and time charter services revenue recognition:

The Partnership’s interest in the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income is included in the consolidated financial statements under the equity method of accounting, however, the Joint venture FSRUs’ results are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note (note 4) and the time charter revenue note (note 5). The Neptune’s and the Cape Ann’s time charters, which had a twenty-year lease term at inception, are accounted for as operating leases. The joint ventures’ time charters include provisions for the charterer to make upfront payments to compensate for variable cost for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts. The expenditures are considered costs required to fulfill the lease component of the contract. Payments for modifications are deferred and amortized over the shorter of the remaining charter period or the useful life of the additions. Payments for reimbursement of drydocking costs are deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the period to the next drydocking.

The accounting policy for time charter services for the joint ventures is the same as described above.

Significant judgments in revenue recognition:

The Partnership does not provide stand-alone bareboat leases or time charter services for FSRUs. As a result, observable stand-alone transaction prices for the performance obligations are not available. The estimation of the transaction price for the lease and the time charter service performance obligation is complex, subject to a number of input factors, such as market conditions when the contract is entered into, internal return objectives and pricing policies, and requires substantial judgment. Significant changes in the transaction price between the two performance obligations could impact conclusions on the accounting for leases as financing or operating leases. In addition, variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount that the Partnership expects to be entitled to. Variable consideration is reassessed at the end of the reporting period taking into account performance warranties. The time charter contracts include provisions for performance guarantees that can result in off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other payments for performance warranties. Measurement of some of the performance warranties can be complex and require properly calibrated equipment on the vessel, complex conversions and computations based on substantial judgment in the interpretation of the contractual provisions. Conclusions on compliance with performance warranties impact the amount of variable consideration recognized for time charter services.

Contract assets:

Revenue recognized in excess of the monthly invoiced amounts, or accrued revenue, is recorded as contract assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The contract assets are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other receivables.

Contract liabilities:

Advance payments in excess of revenue recognized, or prepayments, and deferred revenue is recorded as contract liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Contract assets and liabilities are reported in a net position for each customer contract or combined contracts at the end of each reporting period. Contract liabilities are classified as current or non-current based on the expected timing of recognition of the revenue. Current and non-current contract liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Refund liabilities:

Amounts invoiced or paid by the customer that are expected to be refunded to the customer are recorded as refund liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Refund liabilities may include invoiced amounts for estimated reimbursable operating expenses or other costs and taxes that exceeded the actual costs incurred, or off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages, or other payments for performance warranties. Refund liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables.

Remaining performance obligations:

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of contracts with customers under the scope of ASC 606 for which work has not been performed excluding unexercised contract options to extend the term. The Partnership qualifies for and has elected to apply the exemption to disclose the aggregate amount of remaining transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of the reporting period as consideration for time charter services is variable and allocated entirely to wholly satisfied performance obligations.

Related expenses:

Voyage expenses include bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal tolls and agency fees. Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage and when a vessel is on hire under time charters are generally the responsibility of, and paid directly by the charterers, and not included in the statement of income. When the vessel is off-hire, voyage expenses, principally fuel, may also be incurred and are paid by the FSRU-owning entity.

Vessel operating expenses, reflected in expenses in the statement of income, include crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils, communication expenses and management fees. Vessel operating expenses also include bunker fuel expenses when the vessel is on hire and the expenses are not directly paid and owed by the charterers. When the vessel is on hire, vessel operating expenses are invoiced as time charter service fees to the charterer or are covered by time charter rates. When the vessel is off-hire, vessel operating expenses are not invoiced to the charterer.

Voyage expenses, if applicable, and vessel operating expenses are expensed when incurred.

Construction contract expenses

Construction contract expenses include direct costs on contracts, including project management, labor and materials, amounts payable to subcontractors and capitalized interest.

Loss contingencies, insurance and other claims

Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability and the estimated amount of loss. Such assessments involve complex judgments about future events and estimates and assumptions that are deemed reasonable by management. Accruals are reviewed quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of additional information such as the impact of negotiations, advice of legal counsel or settlements.

Insurance claims for property damage are recorded, net of any deductible amounts, for recoveries up to the amount of loss recognized when the claims to insurance carriers are probable of recovery. Claims for property damage in excess of the loss recognized and for loss of revenue during off-hire, whether from insurance providers or indemnification from Höegh LNG, are considered gain contingencies, which are recognized when the proceeds are received.

Indemnification proceeds from Höegh LNG that cover the Partnership’s costs are accounted for following the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 1.B and SAB Topic 5.T. SAB Topic 1.B provides that the separate financial statements of a subsidiary should reflect any costs of its operations which are incurred by the owner on its behalf. SAB Topic 5.T provides that costs should be reflected as an expense in the subsidiary’s financial statements with a corresponding credit to contributed equity.

Income taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of income tax expense. The amount of non-cash income tax expense is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and the book bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not recognition criterion is met, a tax position is measured based on the cumulative amount that is more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions is recognized in income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash, banks deposits, time deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are recognized as cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition

Restricted cash includes balances deposited with a bank as required under debt facilities to settle withholding tax, other tax liabilities and other current obligations of the entity, and principal and interest payments as required by the debt facilities. Restricted cash is classified as long-term when the settlement is more than 12 months from the balance sheet date. Cash designated for acquisition in the consolidated statement of cash flows is classified as an investing activity.

Trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable based on historical write-off experience and customer economic data. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management believes that the receivable will not be recovered.

Investments in accumulated earnings or losses of and advances to joint ventures

Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for the Partnership’s proportionate share of earnings or losses and dividend distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had an accumulated share of earnings and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as an asset on the line accumulated earnings of joint ventures. As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership had an accumulated share of losses and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as a liability on the line accumulated losses of joint ventures.

Advances to joint ventures represent loan receivables due from the joint ventures and are recorded at cost. Interest on the advances to joint ventures is recorded to interest income in the consolidated statements of income as incurred. The quarterly payments from joint ventures included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and repayment of principal. Interest is accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment at the end of the loans after the original principal was fully repaid. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016. Payments of interest, including accrued interest repaid at the end of the loans, are treated as return on investment and included as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Payments of principal are included as a component of net cash provided by investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Investments in joint ventures are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value below its carrying value. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value and the resulting impairment is recorded in the consolidated statement of income.

Loan receivables are impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the full amount of the receivable will not be collected. The amount of the impairment is measured as the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate and the carrying amount. The resulting impairment amount is recognized in earnings.

Inventory

Inventory consists of bunker fuel maintained on the FSRUs, if it is owned by the FSRU-owning entity. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Vessels

All costs incurred during the construction of newbuildings, including interest and supervision and technical costs, are capitalized. The cost of an acquired vessel is the fair value. Vessels are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a vessel’s estimated useful life, less an estimated residual value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life of 35 years for the FSRUs.

Modifications to the vessels, including the addition of new equipment, which improves or increases the operational efficiency, functionality or safety of the vessels, are capitalized. These expenditures are amortized over the estimated useful life of the modification.

Expenditures covering recurring routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Drydocking expenditures are capitalized when incurred and amortized over the period until the next anticipated drydocking. For vessels that are newly built, the "built-in overhaul" method of accounting is applied. Under the built-in overhaul method, costs of the newbuilding are segregated into costs that should be depreciated over the useful life of the vessel and costs that require drydocking at periodic intervals. The drydocking component is amortized until the date of the first drydocking following the delivery, upon which the actual drydocking cost is capitalized and the process is repeated. Costs of drydocking incurred to meet regulatory requirements or improve the vessel’s operating efficiency, functionality or safety are generally capitalized. Costs incurred related to routine repairs and maintenance performed during drydocking are expensed.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Vessels are assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the recoverability of vessels is assessed by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the vessel’s net carrying value exceeds the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated over its remaining useful life, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. An impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the vessel.

Intangibles and goodwill

Intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date of a business combination. All intangible assets of the Partnership have a definite life. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized over their useful life. Intangible assets with a definite life are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.

In determining the useful lives of intangible assets, the expected use of the assets, the contractual provisions that limit the useful life and other economic factors are considered. The contract related intangibles and their useful lives as of the acquisition dates, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Useful life

Intangible category

    

(Years)

Above market time charter Höegh Gallant

 

3.4

Option for time charter extension Höegh Gallant

 

5.3

Above market time charter Höegh Grace

 

9.5

 

The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Gallant is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis over the remaining term of the contract of approximately 3.4 years as of the acquisition date. The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Grace is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis calculated per day over the remaining non-cancellable charter term of approximately 9.5 years as of the acquisition date of the initial 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Höegh LNG and the Partnership have entered into an option agreement pursuant to which the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the existing charter until July 2025. The Partnership exercised the option on February 27, 2020 and intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant (the “Subsequent Charter”). The intangible for the option for time charter extension will be amortized on a straight line basis over the extension period starting at the beginning of the Subsequent Charter, subject to impairment testing for recoverability in the preceding periods.

Goodwill arises when an acquisition is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the consideration over the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Derivative instruments

All derivative instruments are initially recorded at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and are subsequently remeasured to fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the derivative. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss is dependent on whether the contract is designated as a hedging instrument and qualifies for hedge accounting.

For derivative instruments that are not designated or that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in earnings. In order to designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, formal documentation of the relationship between the derivative and the hedged item is required. This documentation includes the strategy and risk management objective for undertaking the hedge and the method that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge.

Interest rate swaps are used for the management of interest rate risk exposure. The interest rate swaps have the effect of converting a portion of the outstanding debt from a floating to a fixed rate over the life of the transactions. As of January 1, 2019, the following accounting policies became effective for cash flow hedges of interest rate swaps.

For interest rate swaps qualifying as cash flow hedges, the fair value of the portion of the derivative instruments included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness ("hedge effectiveness") and the initial fair value of the hedge component excluded from hedge effectiveness are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Subsequent changes in fair value for the portion of the derivative instruments included in hedge effectiveness are recorded in other comprehensive income. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings (interest expense is incurred for floating interest rate debt), those amounts are transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. The initial fair value component excluded from hedge effectiveness is amortized to earnings over the life of the hedging instrument. The amortization is recognized on the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Any difference in the change in fair value of the hedge components excluded from hedge effectiveness and the amount recognized in earnings is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

Prospective and retrospective hedge effectiveness is assessed on an ongoing basis. If a cash flow hedge is no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. If a cash flow hedge for an interest rate swap is terminated and the originally hedged item is still considered probable of occurring, the gains and losses initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income remain there until the hedged item impacts earnings, at which point they are amortized to earnings on a systematic and rational basis to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. If the hedged items are no longer considered probable of occurring, amounts recognized in total equity are immediately transferred to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. Cash flows from derivative instruments that are accounted for as cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items being hedged.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges were initially recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Any hedge ineffectiveness was recognized immediately in earnings, as were any gains and losses or amortization on the portion of the derivative instruments that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings, those amounts were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the gain (loss) on derivative instruments line in the consolidated statement of income.

Deferred debt issuance costs and fair value of debt assumed

Debt issuance costs, including arrangement fees and legal expenses, are deferred and presented as a direct deduction from the outstanding principal of the related debt in the consolidated balance sheet and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of debt issuance costs is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the deferred debt issuance costs is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

The discount or premium arising in a business combination for the difference in the fair value of the debt assumed compared to the outstanding principal is reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct adjustment to the outstanding principal of the related debt and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of fair value of the debt assumed is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the discount or premium is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, purchase price allocation, the useful lives of vessels, drydocking, loss contingencies and the value of derivative instruments.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

Leases: In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued revised guidance for leasing, Leases, that amends the accounting guidance on leases for both lessors and lessees. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard using the optional transition method to apply the new standard at the transition date of January 1, 2019 with no retrospective adjustments to prior periods. Consequently, the accounting and disclosures for the prior periods continue to be presented in accordance with the previous standard for leases. The Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and has not reassessed conclusions under the previous standard about whether any expired or existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. In addition, the election to use hindsight when determining lease term for modifications to existing leases at the transition date was applied. The Partnership adopted an accounting policy to apply the short-term lease expedient as a lessee for leases under 12‑months. This includes classes of leases for office equipment, office premises and vehicles used for administrative purposes, as well as, short-term leases of equipment used for projects, drydocking or maintenance associated with the vessels.

The Partnership is the lessor for time charters for its FSRUs. There were no changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized and, therefore, no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessor accounting. Additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required and have been implemented for reporting periods beginning as of January 1, 2019, while prior periods are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous accounting standards. Refer to note 5 for the qualitative and quantitative disclosures provided. As of January 1, 2019, cash payments received for the principal portion of the financing lease are presented as an operating cash inflow rather than as an investing cash inflow as presented for prior periods in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

The Partnership does not have material lease assets. Adoption of the new standard resulted in recording at a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for operating leases of $0.15 million and $0.15 million, respectively, as of December 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessee accounting. As of December 31, 2019, the right-of-use asset and the lease liability for operating leases was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The right-of-use asset is included as a component of other equipment in the consolidated balance sheet. The current and long-term lease liabilities are included as components of accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Derivatives and Hedging: In August 2017, the FASB issued revised guidance for Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Those amounts are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item when hedged item affects earnings. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard on a prospective basis which had no material impact for accounting for cash flow hedges for the Partnership’s interest rate swaps. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings from initial application of the standard. However, certain amounts reclassified or recorded to earnings were reported as a component of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with the presentation in previous periods in the gain (loss) on the derivative instruments line in the consolidated statements of income. In addition, the new disclosure requirements were applied on a prospective basis in note 17.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued revised guidance for Financial Instruments — Credit Losses:Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The revised guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodlogy that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This revised guidance is effective for the Partnership from January 1, 2020, with a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued revised guidance for Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the test for Goodwill Impirment.  The revised guidance simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The revised guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the Partnership will adopt the standard from January 1, 2020. The adoption of the standard will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. The recorded amount of the Partnership’s goodwill is $0.3 million as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 12.

In Decenber 2019, FASB issued revised guidance for Income Taxes – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The revised guidance eliminates certain exceptions to the guidance related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in interim or annual periods for which public business entities have not yet issued financial statements. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this revised guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

v3.20.1
Financial income (expense), net
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Financial income (expense), net  
Financial income (expense), net

6.   Financial income (expense), net

The components of financial income (expense), net are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Interest income

 

$

947

 

725

 

$

500

Interest expense:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Interest expense

 

 

(24,950)

 

(26,077)

 

 

(28,280)

Commitment fees

 

 

(381)

 

(37)

 

 

(977)

Amortization of debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed

 

 

(2,361)

 

(700)

 

 

(828)

Total interest expense

 

 

(27,692)

 

(26,814)

 

 

(30,085)

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,030

 

 —

 

 

 —

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

 —

 

4,681

 

 

2,463

Other items, net:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

 

 

(396)

 

(193)

 

 

(968)

Bank charges, fees and other

 

 

(297)

 

(143)

 

 

(107)

Withholding tax on interest expense and other

 

 

(2,882)

 

(2,571)

 

 

(2,499)

Total other items, net

 

 

(3,575)

 

(2,907)

 

 

(3,574)

Total financial income (expense), net

 

$

(29,290)

 

(24,315)

 

$

(30,696)

 

Interest income related to cash balances and interest accrued on the advances to the joint ventures for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. As of January 1, 2019, interest expense includes reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income and amortization of the components excluded from hedge effectiveness related to derivatives due to the adoption of the revised guidance for derivatives and hedging. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Refer to note 2. For each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, gain (loss) on derivatives included the gain or loss on hedge ineffectiveness as well as amortization related to derivatives. Refer to note 17 for additional information on the types of gains and losses on derivatives included in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019. Interest expense also includes interest related to the revolving credit facility from Höegh LNG, the seller’s credit note until October 2017, the $385 million facility, the Lampung facility and the Gallant/Grace facility until January 31, 2019. The gain on debt extinguishment relates to the refinancing of the Gallant/Grace facility with the $385 million facility. When the entities owning the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace were acquired, a premium on the debt under the Gallant facility and the Grace facility was recognized. The unamortized balance was recorded as a gain when the debt was extinguished on January 31, 2019. Refer to notes 13, 15 and 16.

v3.20.1
Segment information (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Segment information  
Schedule of segment information

The following tables include the results for the segments for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Year ended December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

    

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

145,321

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,754

 

(42,433)

(1)  

$

145,321

Other revenue

 

 

115

 

 —

 

 —

 

115

 

 

(1)  

 

115

Total revenues

 

 

145,436

 

42,433

 

 —

 

187,869

 

 

  

 

145,436

Operating expenses (2)

 

 

(34,266)

 

(9,044)

 

(6,465)

 

(49,775)

 

9,044

(1)  

 

(40,731)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

6,078

(1)  

 

6,078

Segment EBITDA

 

 

111,170

 

33,389

 

(6,465)

 

138,094

 

  

  

 

  

Depreciation, amortization and impairment

 

 

(21,477)

 

(10,030)

 

 —

 

(31,507)

 

10,030

(1)  

 

(21,477)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

89,693

 

23,359

 

(6,465)

 

106,587

 

 

  

 

89,306

Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment

 

 

1,030

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,030

 

 

(1)  

 

1,030

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

 —

 

(5,209)

 

 —

 

(5,209)

 

5,209

(1)  

 

 —

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(12,511)

 

(12,072)

 

(17,809)

 

(42,392)

 

12,072

(1)  

 

(30,320)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

78,212

 

6,078

 

(24,274)

 

60,016

 

 —

 

 

60,016

Income tax expense

 

 

(7,278)

 

 —

 

 3

 

(7,275)

 

 —

 

 

(7,275)

Net income (loss)

 

$

70,934

 

6,078

 

(24,271)

 

52,741

 

 —

 

$

52,741

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

13,850

(3)  

 

13,850

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

70,934

 

6,078

 

(24,271)

 

52,741

 

(13,850)

(3)  

$

38,891


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.

(2)

The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary was assessed a property tax and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The retroactive assessment was as a result of the issuance of a new regulation in 2019, defining FSRUs as subject to the existing Indonesian property tax law.  The property tax and penalties were recorded as a component of vessel operating expenses.

(3)

Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

    

reporting

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

$

640,431

 

252,789

 

 —

 

893,220

 

(252,789)

(1)  

$

640,431

Net investment in financing lease

 

 

278,904

 

 —

 

 —

 

278,904

 

 —

 

 

278,904

Goodwill

 

 

251

 

 —

 

 —

 

251

 

 —

 

 

251

Advances to joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,831

 

3,831

 

 —

 

 

3,831

Total assets

 

 

996,201

 

284,174

 

16,599

 

1,296,974

 

(284,174)

(1)  

 

1,012,800

Accumulated earnings of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

50

 

50

 

3,220

(1)  

 

3,270

Expenditures for vessels & equipment

 

 

211

 

195

 

 —

 

406

 

(195)

(2)  

 

211

Expenditures for drydocking

 

 

3,107

 

913

 

 —

 

4,020

 

(913)

(2)  

 

3,107

Impairment/retirement of equipment

 

 

 —

 

(75)

 

 —

 

(75)

 

75

(2)  

 

 —

Principal repayment financing lease

 

 

4,168

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,168

 

 —

 

 

4,168

Amortization of above market contract

 

$

3,631

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,631

 

 —

 

$

3,631


(1)

Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated earnings of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

144,952

 

43,169

 

 

188,121

 

(43,169)

(1)

$

144,952

Other revenue

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

1,609

 

 

(1)

 

1,609

Total revenues

 

 

146,561

 

43,169

 

 

189,730

 

 

 

 

146,561

Operating expenses

 

 

(27,294)

 

(10,932)

 

(5,817)

 

(44,043)

 

10,932

(1)

 

(33,111)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,938

(1)

 

17,938

Segment EBITDA

 

 

119,267

 

32,237

 

(5,817)

 

145,687

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(21,146)

 

(9,725)

 

 

(30,871)

 

9,725

(1)

 

(21,146)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

98,121

 

22,512

 

(5,817)

 

114,816

 

 

 

 

110,242

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

4,681

 

8,496

 

 

13,177

 

(8,496)

(1)

 

4,681

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(26,381)

 

(13,070)

 

(2,615)

 

(42,066)

 

13,070

(1)

 

(28,996)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

76,421

 

17,938

 

(8,432)

 

85,927

 

 

 

85,927

Income tax expense

 

 

(8,253)

 

 

(52)

 

(8,305)

 

 

 

(8,305)

Net income (loss)

 

$

68,168

 

17,938

 

(8,484)

 

77,622

 

 

$

77,622

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,303

(2)

 

12,303

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

68,168

 

17,938

 

(8,484)

 

77,622

 

(12,303)

(2)

$

65,319


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

$

658,311

 

261,614

 

 —

 

919,925

 

(261,614)

(1)

$

658,311

Net investment in financing lease

 

 

283,073

 

 —

 

 —

 

283,073

 

 —

 

 

283,073

Goodwill

 

 

251

 

 —

 

 —

 

251

 

 —

 

 

251

Advances to joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,536

 

3,536

 

 —

 

 

3,536

Total assets

 

 

1,007,202

 

286,283

 

15,838

 

1,309,323

 

(286,283)

(1)

 

1,023,040

Accumulated losses of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

50

 

50

 

(2,858)

(1)

 

(2,808)

Expenditures for vessels & equipment

 

 

257

 

3,305

 

 —

 

3,562

 

(3,305)

(2)

 

257

Expenditures for drydocking

 

 

 —

 

2,490

 

 —

 

2,490

 

(2,490)

(2)

 

 —

Principal repayment financing lease

 

 

3,814

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,814

 

 —

 

 

3,814

Amortization of above market contract

 

$

3,631

 

 —

 

 —

 

3,631

 

 —

 

$

3,631


(1)

Eliminates the proportional share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation, and Total assets and reflects the Partnership’s share of net assets (assets less liabilities) of the Joint venture FSRUs as Accumulated losses of joint ventures.

(2)

Eliminates the Joint venture FSRUs’ Expenditures for vessels & equipment and drydocking to reflect the consolidated expenditures of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

Joint venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Majority

 

FSRUs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

held

 

(proportional

 

 

 

Segment

 

Elimin-

 

Consolidated

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

FSRUs

    

consolidation)

    

Other

    

reporting

    

ations

 

reporting

Time charter revenues

 

$

143,531

 

42,165

 

 —

 

185,696

 

(42,165)

(1)

$

143,531

Accrual historical boil-off claim

 

 

 —

 

(11,850)

 

 —

 

(11,850)

 

11,850

(1)(2)

 

 —

Total revenues

 

 

143,531

 

30,315

 

 —

 

173,846

 

 

  

 

143,531

Operating expenses

 

 

(27,612)

 

(8,628)

 

(6,089)

 

(42,329)

 

8,628

(1)

 

(33,701)

Construction contract expenses

 

 

(151)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(151)

 

 

(3)

 

(151)

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

5,139

(1)

 

5,139

Less: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA

 

 

(19,210)

 

 —

 

 —

 

(19,210)

 

19,210

(4)

 

 —

Segment EBITDA

 

 

96,558

 

21,687

 

(6,089)

 

112,156

 

  

  

 

  

Add: Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA

 

 

19,210

 

 —

 

 —

 

19,210

 

(19,210)

(4)

 

 —

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(21,054)

 

(9,815)

 

 —

 

(30,869)

 

9,815

(1)

 

(21,054)

Operating income (loss)

 

 

94,714

 

11,872

 

(6,089)

 

100,497

 

 

  

 

93,764

Gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

2,463

 

7,194

 

 —

 

9,657

 

(7,194)

(1)

 

2,463

Other financial income (expense), net

 

 

(29,656)

 

(13,927)

 

(3,503)

 

(47,086)

 

13,927

(1)

 

(33,159)

Income (loss) before tax

 

 

67,521

 

5,139

 

(9,592)

 

63,068

 

 —

 

 

63,068

Income tax benefit (expense)

 

 

(3,893)

 

 —

 

15

 

(3,878)

 

 —

 

 

(3,878)

Net income (loss)

 

$

63,628

 

5,139

 

(9,577)

 

59,190

 

 —

 

$

59,190

Non-controlling interest in net income

 

 

10,408

 

 —

 

 —

 

10,408

 

 

  

 

10,408

Preferred unitholders’ interest in net income

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

2,480

(5)

 

2,480

Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)

 

$

53,220

 

5,139

 

(9,577)

 

48,782

 

(2,480)

(5)

$

46,302


(1)

Eliminations reverse each of the income statement line items of the proportional consolidation amounts for Joint venture FSRUs and record the Partnership’s share of the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income (loss) to Equity in earnings (loss) of joint ventures.

(2)

For additional information, refer to note 18 under “Joint ventures claims and accruals.”

(3)

The warranty work for the Mooring was completed in 2017 resulting in additional expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.

(4)

Eliminations reverse the adjustment to Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA included for Segment EBITDA and the adjustment to reverse the Non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to reconcile to operating income and net income.

(5)

Allocates the preferred unitholders’ interest in net income to the preferred unitholders.

Schedule of total revenues from the customers

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the percentage of consolidated total revenues from the following customers accounted for over 10% of the Partnership’s consolidated total revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

PT PGN LNG Indonesia

 

33

%  

33

%  

33

%

Höegh LNG Egypt LLC

 

31

%  

31

%  

31

%

Sociedad Portuaria El Cayao S.A. E.S.P.

 

36

%  

36

%  

36

%

 

v3.20.1
Significant accounting policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Significant accounting policies  
Basis of presentation

Basis of presentation

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.

It has been determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung, Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. are variable interest entities. A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is defined by US GAAP as a legal entity where either (a) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or both, and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights, or (b) the equity holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and rewards. The guidance requires a VIE to be consolidated if any of its interest holders are entitled to a majority of the entity’s residual returns or are exposed to a majority of its expected losses.

Based upon the criteria set forth in US GAAP, the Partnership has determined that PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a VIE, as the equity holders, through their equity investments, may not participate fully in the entity’s expected residual returns and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, the Partnership. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of PT Hoegh LNG Lampung are included in the consolidated financial statements. Dividends may only be paid if the retained earnings are positive and a statutory reserve has been established equal to 20% of its paid up capital under Indonesian law. PT Hoegh LNG Lampung had not established the required statutory reserves as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Therefore, PT Hoegh LNG Lampung cannot make dividend payments under Indonesian law. Under the Lampung facility, there are limitations on cash dividends and loans that can be made to the Partnership. Refer to note 13. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $169.8 million and $164.4 million, respectively.

The Partnership has determined that Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited is a VIE, as the equity investment does not provide sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without financial guarantees. The Partnership is the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives all the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited are included in the consolidated financial statements. Under Cyprus law, dividends may only be distributed out of profits and not from the share capital of the company. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

The Partnership has also determined that Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. is a VIE since the entity would not be able to finance its activities without financial guarantees under its subsidiary’s facility to finance Höegh Grace. As of January 1, 2017, the Partnership became the primary beneficiary, as it has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIE and receives the majority of the expected benefits or expected losses. Therefore, 100% of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and subsidiaries, are included in the consolidated financial statements with a non-controlling interest reflected for the minority share until December 1, 2017. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Under Cayman Islands law, dividends may only be paid out of profits or capital reserves if the entity is solvent after the distributions. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted net assets of the consolidated subsidiaries were $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Dividends and other distributions from Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited, Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. and Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd. may only be distributed if after the dividend payment, the Partnership would remain in compliance with the financial covenants under the $385 million facility. Refer to note 13.

In addition, the Partnership has determined that the two joint ventures, SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd., are VIEs since each entity did not have a sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support. The entities have been financed with third party debt and subordinated shareholders loans. The Partnership is not the primary beneficiary, as the Partnership cannot make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the VIEs, but has joint control with the other equity holders. Therefore, the joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the Partnership has significant influence. The Partnership’s carrying value is recorded in advances to joint ventures and accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures in the consolidated balance sheets. For SRV Joint Gas Ltd., the Partnership had a receivable for the advances of $3.0 million and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $2.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership’s accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2018. The Partnership’s carrying value for SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. consists of a receivable for the advances of $0.8 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Partnership’s accumulated earnings, or its share of net assets, was $0.7 million as of December 31, 2019 and the Partnership’s accumulated losses, or its share of net liabilities, was $2.0 million as of December 31, 2018. The major reasons that the Partnership had low accumulated earnings in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2019 and accumulated losses in the joint ventures as of December 31, 2018 was due to the fair value adjustments for the interest rate swaps recorded as liabilities on the balance sheets of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. and eliminations for consolidation to the balance sheet. The maximum exposure to loss is the carrying value of the receivables, which is subordinated to the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, the investments in the joint ventures (accumulated earnings or losses), as the shares are pledged as security for the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt, and Höegh LNG’s commitment under long-term bank loan agreements to fund its share of drydocking costs and remarketing efforts in the event of an early termination of the charters. If the charters terminate for any reason that does not result in a termination fee, the joint ventures’ long-term bank debt would be subject to mandatory repayment. Dividend distributions require a) agreement of the other joint venture owners; b) fulfilment of requirements of the long-term bank loans; c) and under Cayman Islands law may be paid out of profits or capital reserves subject to the joint venture being solvent after the distribution.

Foreign currencies

Foreign currencies

The reporting currency in the consolidated financial statements is the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of the FSRU-owning entities. Nearly all revenues are received in U.S. dollars and a majority of the Partnership’s expenditures for investments and all of the long-term debt are denominated in U.S. dollars. Transactions denominated in other currencies during the year are converted into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the time of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Resulting gains or losses are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.

Business combinations and asset acquisitions

Business combinations and asset acquisitions

Business combinations are accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Under this method, the purchase price is allocated to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair values of net assets is recognized as goodwill. Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. The results of entity acquired are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Dependent upon facts and circumstances, the assessment of a transaction may be considered the acquisition of an asset, when substantially all of the fair value of assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, rather than a business combination. Asset acquisitions are accounted for by allocating the cost of the acquisition to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. Acquisition related costs are capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets acquired.

Time charter revenue, related contract balances and related expenses

Time charter revenue, related contract balances and related expenses

Time charter revenues and related contract balances:

The Partnership is required to evaluate whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as a single contract, whether the contract promises to deliver more than one distinct good or service, or performance obligations, and/or a lease, determine the transaction price under the contract, allocate the transaction price to the lease and the performance obligations and recognize revenue as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Partnership believes the nature of its time charter contracts are the same, regardless of whether the contracts are accounted for as financing leases or operating leases for accounting purposes. As such, when adopting the revised guidance on leases as of January 1, 2019, the Partnership did not elect to apply the practical expedient to not separate lease and services components for operating leases because this would result in inconsistent disclosure for the time charter contracts.

Performance obligations:

The Partnership determined that its time charter contracts contain a lease and a performance obligation for the provision of time charter services. The lease of the vessel, representing the use of the vessel without any associated performance obligations or warranties, is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 842; Leases.

The provision of time charter services, including guarantees for the level of performance provided by the time charter contracts, is considered a distinct service and is accounted for in accordance with the provision of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Partnership determined that the nature of the time charter services promised, represents a single performance obligation, to stand ready over a 24‑hour interval to accept LNG cargos, to transport cargos, to regasify the LNG and discharge the resulting gas into a pipeline in accordance with the charterer’s instructions and requirements.

Time charter services revenue can be recognized as the performance obligation is satisfied over the 24‑hour interval to the performance standards specified under the time charter contract. If the performance standards are not met, off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other performance payments may result.

Contract terms, determination of transaction price and allocation to performance obligations:

The Partnership’s time charter contracts for all FSRUs, except the Höegh Gallant, include day rates or hire rates and warranty provisions with the following components:

·

Fixed element: The fixed element is a fixed per day fee intended to cover remuneration for use of the vessel and the provision of time charter services.

·

Operating expense reimbursement element: The operating expense reimbursement element is a rate per day intended to cover the operating costs of the vessel, including the crew, insurance, consumables, miscellaneous services, spares and maintenance and repairs costs and management services and fees. The amount of the operating expense reimbursement element may be based on actual cost incurred, or fees subject to indexing or other adjustments after a defined period, or a combination of both.

·

Tax reimbursement element: The tax reimbursement element may be a rate per day, based on the estimated liability for the year divided by the number of days in the year, subject to adjustment for actual taxes incurred, or a reimbursement of the costs as the taxes are incurred. The tax reimbursement element may cover withholding taxes, payroll taxes, other local taxes and current income tax expense for the jurisdiction in which the vessel operates as defined by the provisions of the individual time charter contract.

·

Performance warranties element: The performance warranties element includes defined operational capacity and standards that can result in the FSRUs being off-hire or require compensation to the charterer through provision of reduced hire, liquidated damages or performance payments. Examples of performance warranties include the ability to discharge regasified LNG at specified performance rates, guaranteed minimum fuel consumption, guaranteed minimum boil-off rates and the ability to accept cargos.

The Höegh Gallant has a single day rate intended to cover all of the elements listed above. In addition, the time charter contract for the Höegh Gallant includes a provision for 15 days of off-hire for scheduled maintenance. The joint ventures’ time charter contracts also provide for upfront payments for variable costs for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts.

The hire rates for the PGN FSRU Lampung and the joint ventures are invoiced at the beginning of the month. The Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace invoice time charter revenues monthly in arrears.

The transaction price is estimated as the standalone selling price for the lease and the time charter services components of the fixed day rate element. Variable consideration per day for operating expense and tax reimbursements is estimated at the most likely amount to which the Partnership is expected to be entitled to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty related to the variable consideration is resolved. When there is significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received, that variable consideration is considered constrained. Typically, variable reimbursements and performance warranties are known at the end of each 24‑hour interval, or as subsequently reassessed at the end of the reporting period. However, to the extent interpretations of contractual provisions are complex and/or disputed with the customer, this could give rise to constrained variable consideration. Constrained variable consideration is not estimated.

Variable consideration is allocated entirely to one performance obligation when the variable day rate relates specifically to the efforts to satisfy the single performance obligation. The default method of the relative standalone selling price method was used to allocate the remaining transaction price, principally the fixed element, between the lease and the time charter services. The total estimated transaction price for time charter services is considered variable consideration because it may be reduced by performance warranties.

The Partnership has made a policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by a government entity on revenues and collected on behalf of that government entity from customers, such as sales or value added taxes.

Lease revenue recognition:

Leases are classified based upon defined criteria either as sale-type/direct financing leases (“financing leases”) or operating leases. A lease that transfers substantially all of the benefits and risks of the FSRU to the charterer is accounted for as a financing lease by the lessor. All other leases that do not meet the criteria are classified as operating leases. On January 1, 2019, when adopting the revised leasing guidance, the Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and did not reassess conclusions under the previous standard about whether any existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. Accordingly, outstanding leases on January 1, 2019, continue to be classified in accordance with the prior lease guidance.

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as operating leases is recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the charter. The Höegh Gallant’s time charter, which had a five-year lease term at inception, is accounted for as an operating lease. The Höegh Grace’s time charter contracts, which have a non-cancellable charter period of ten years, are accounted for as an operating lease. Under one of the time charter contracts, the contract provides for additional variable payments, including a finance component, over the initial term depending upon the actual commencement date of the contract within a defined window of potential commencement dates. The variable payments are considered directly related to the lease performance obligation. The revenue, excluding the financing component, is recognized over the initial 10-year term. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for final income tax directly related to the provision of the lease is recorded as a component of lease revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

The lease component of time charters that are accounted for as financing leases is recognized over the lease term using the effective interest rate method and is included in time charter revenues. Origination costs related to the time charter are a component of the net investment in financing lease and amortized over the lease term using the effective interest method. Financing leases are reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as net investments in financing leases. The PGN FSRU Lampung time charter, which had a 20‑year lease term at inception, meets the criteria of transferring substantially all of the benefits and risks to the charterer and is accounted for as a financing lease.

Time charter services revenue recognition:

Variable consideration for the time charter services performance obligation, including amounts allocated to time charter services, estimated reimbursements for vessel operating expenses and estimated reimbursements of certain types of costs and taxes, are recognized as revenues as the performance obligation for the 24‑hour interval is fulfilled, subject to adjustment for off-hire and performance warranties. Constrained variable consideration is recognized as revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis when the significant uncertainty related to that amount of variable consideration to be received is resolved. Estimates for variable consideration, including constrained variable consideration, are reassessed at the end of each period. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes directly related to the provision of the time charter services are recorded as a component of time charter service revenues. The amount of non-cash revenue is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Joint venture FSRUs lease and time charter services revenue recognition:

The Partnership’s interest in the Joint venture FSRUs’ net income is included in the consolidated financial statements under the equity method of accounting, however, the Joint venture FSRUs’ results are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note (note 4) and the time charter revenue note (note 5). The Neptune’s and the Cape Ann’s time charters, which had a twenty-year lease term at inception, are accounted for as operating leases. The joint ventures’ time charters include provisions for the charterer to make upfront payments to compensate for variable cost for certain vessel modifications, drydocking costs, other additions to equipment or spare parts. The expenditures are considered costs required to fulfill the lease component of the contract. Payments for modifications are deferred and amortized over the shorter of the remaining charter period or the useful life of the additions. Payments for reimbursement of drydocking costs are deferred and recognized on a straight line basis over the period to the next drydocking.

The accounting policy for time charter services for the joint ventures is the same as described above.

Significant judgments in revenue recognition:

The Partnership does not provide stand-alone bareboat leases or time charter services for FSRUs. As a result, observable stand-alone transaction prices for the performance obligations are not available. The estimation of the transaction price for the lease and the time charter service performance obligation is complex, subject to a number of input factors, such as market conditions when the contract is entered into, internal return objectives and pricing policies, and requires substantial judgment. Significant changes in the transaction price between the two performance obligations could impact conclusions on the accounting for leases as financing or operating leases. In addition, variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount that the Partnership expects to be entitled to. Variable consideration is reassessed at the end of the reporting period taking into account performance warranties. The time charter contracts include provisions for performance guarantees that can result in off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages or other payments for performance warranties. Measurement of some of the performance warranties can be complex and require properly calibrated equipment on the vessel, complex conversions and computations based on substantial judgment in the interpretation of the contractual provisions. Conclusions on compliance with performance warranties impact the amount of variable consideration recognized for time charter services.

Contract assets:

Revenue recognized in excess of the monthly invoiced amounts, or accrued revenue, is recorded as contract assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The contract assets are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a component of prepaid expenses and other receivables.

Contract liabilities:

Advance payments in excess of revenue recognized, or prepayments, and deferred revenue is recorded as contract liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Contract assets and liabilities are reported in a net position for each customer contract or combined contracts at the end of each reporting period. Contract liabilities are classified as current or non-current based on the expected timing of recognition of the revenue. Current and non-current contract liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Refund liabilities:

Amounts invoiced or paid by the customer that are expected to be refunded to the customer are recorded as refund liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Refund liabilities may include invoiced amounts for estimated reimbursable operating expenses or other costs and taxes that exceeded the actual costs incurred, or off-hire, reduced hire, liquidated damages, or other payments for performance warranties. Refund liabilities are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as components of accrued liabilities and other payables.

Remaining performance obligations:

Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of contracts with customers under the scope of ASC 606 for which work has not been performed excluding unexercised contract options to extend the term. The Partnership qualifies for and has elected to apply the exemption to disclose the aggregate amount of remaining transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of the reporting period as consideration for time charter services is variable and allocated entirely to wholly satisfied performance obligations.

Related expenses:

Voyage expenses include bunker fuel expenses, port fees, cargo loading and unloading expenses, canal tolls and agency fees. Voyage expenses are all expenses unique to a particular voyage and when a vessel is on hire under time charters are generally the responsibility of, and paid directly by the charterers, and not included in the statement of income. When the vessel is off-hire, voyage expenses, principally fuel, may also be incurred and are paid by the FSRU-owning entity.

Vessel operating expenses, reflected in expenses in the statement of income, include crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance, stores, lube oils, communication expenses and management fees. Vessel operating expenses also include bunker fuel expenses when the vessel is on hire and the expenses are not directly paid and owed by the charterers. When the vessel is on hire, vessel operating expenses are invoiced as time charter service fees to the charterer or are covered by time charter rates. When the vessel is off-hire, vessel operating expenses are not invoiced to the charterer.

Voyage expenses, if applicable, and vessel operating expenses are expensed when incurred.

Construction contract expenses

Construction contract expenses

Construction contract expenses include direct costs on contracts, including project management, labor and materials, amounts payable to subcontractors and capitalized interest.

Loss contingencies, insurance and other claims

Loss contingencies, insurance and other claims

Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the probability and the estimated amount of loss. Such assessments involve complex judgments about future events and estimates and assumptions that are deemed reasonable by management. Accruals are reviewed quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of additional information such as the impact of negotiations, advice of legal counsel or settlements.

Insurance claims for property damage are recorded, net of any deductible amounts, for recoveries up to the amount of loss recognized when the claims to insurance carriers are probable of recovery. Claims for property damage in excess of the loss recognized and for loss of revenue during off-hire, whether from insurance providers or indemnification from Höegh LNG, are considered gain contingencies, which are recognized when the proceeds are received.

Indemnification proceeds from Höegh LNG that cover the Partnership’s costs are accounted for following the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic 1.B and SAB Topic 5.T. SAB Topic 1.B provides that the separate financial statements of a subsidiary should reflect any costs of its operations which are incurred by the owner on its behalf. SAB Topic 5.T provides that costs should be reflected as an expense in the subsidiary’s financial statements with a corresponding credit to contributed equity.

Income taxes

Income taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Payments made by the charterer directly to the tax authorities on behalf of the subsidiaries for advance collection of income taxes or final income tax is recorded as a component of income tax expense. The amount of non-cash income tax expense is disclosed separately in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and the book bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not recognition criterion is met, a tax position is measured based on the cumulative amount that is more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon examination by tax authorities to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions is recognized in income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash, banks deposits, time deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are recognized as cash and cash equivalents.

Restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition

Restricted cash and cash designated for acquisition

Restricted cash includes balances deposited with a bank as required under debt facilities to settle withholding tax, other tax liabilities and other current obligations of the entity, and principal and interest payments as required by the debt facilities. Restricted cash is classified as long-term when the settlement is more than 12 months from the balance sheet date. Cash designated for acquisition in the consolidated statement of cash flows is classified as an investing activity.

Trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts

Trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts

Trade receivables are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts, or impairment loss, is management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable based on historical write-off experience and customer economic data. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management believes that the receivable will not be recovered.

Investments in accumulated earnings or losses of and advances to joint ventures

Investments in accumulated earnings or losses of and advances to joint ventures

Investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for the Partnership’s proportionate share of earnings or losses and dividend distributions. As of December 31, 2019, the Partnership had an accumulated share of earnings and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as an asset on the line accumulated earnings of joint ventures. As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership had an accumulated share of losses and the balance is classified on the consolidated balance sheet as a liability on the line accumulated losses of joint ventures.

Advances to joint ventures represent loan receivables due from the joint ventures and are recorded at cost. Interest on the advances to joint ventures is recorded to interest income in the consolidated statements of income as incurred. The quarterly payments from joint ventures included a payment of interest for the first month of the quarter and repayment of principal. Interest is accrued for the last two months of the quarter for repayment at the end of the loans after the original principal was fully repaid. The joint ventures repaid the original principal of all shareholder loans during 2016. Payments of interest, including accrued interest repaid at the end of the loans, are treated as return on investment and included as a component of net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Payments of principal are included as a component of net cash provided by investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

Investments in joint ventures are evaluated for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such investments may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value below its carrying value. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value and the resulting impairment is recorded in the consolidated statement of income.

Loan receivables are impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the full amount of the receivable will not be collected. The amount of the impairment is measured as the difference between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate and the carrying amount. The resulting impairment amount is recognized in earnings.

Inventory

Inventory

Inventory consists of bunker fuel maintained on the FSRUs, if it is owned by the FSRU-owning entity. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Vessels

Vessels

All costs incurred during the construction of newbuildings, including interest and supervision and technical costs, are capitalized. The cost of an acquired vessel is the fair value. Vessels are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over a vessel’s estimated useful life, less an estimated residual value. Depreciation is calculated using an estimated useful life of 35 years for the FSRUs.

Modifications to the vessels, including the addition of new equipment, which improves or increases the operational efficiency, functionality or safety of the vessels, are capitalized. These expenditures are amortized over the estimated useful life of the modification.

Expenditures covering recurring routine repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Drydocking expenditures are capitalized when incurred and amortized over the period until the next anticipated drydocking. For vessels that are newly built, the "built-in overhaul" method of accounting is applied. Under the built-in overhaul method, costs of the newbuilding are segregated into costs that should be depreciated over the useful life of the vessel and costs that require drydocking at periodic intervals. The drydocking component is amortized until the date of the first drydocking following the delivery, upon which the actual drydocking cost is capitalized and the process is repeated. Costs of drydocking incurred to meet regulatory requirements or improve the vessel’s operating efficiency, functionality or safety are generally capitalized. Costs incurred related to routine repairs and maintenance performed during drydocking are expensed.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Impairment of long-lived assets

Vessels are assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances are present, the recoverability of vessels is assessed by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the vessel’s net carrying value exceeds the net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated over its remaining useful life, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair value. An impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the vessel.

Intangibles and goodwill

Intangibles and goodwill

Intangible assets are initially measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date of a business combination. All intangible assets of the Partnership have a definite life. Intangible assets with a definite life are amortized over their useful life. Intangible assets with a definite life are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset.

In determining the useful lives of intangible assets, the expected use of the assets, the contractual provisions that limit the useful life and other economic factors are considered. The contract related intangibles and their useful lives as of the acquisition dates, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Useful life

Intangible category

    

(Years)

Above market time charter Höegh Gallant

 

3.4

Option for time charter extension Höegh Gallant

 

5.3

Above market time charter Höegh Grace

 

9.5

 

The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Gallant is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis over the remaining term of the contract of approximately 3.4 years as of the acquisition date. The intangible for the above market value of the time charter contract associated with the Höegh Grace is amortized to time charter revenue on a straight line basis calculated per day over the remaining non-cancellable charter term of approximately 9.5 years as of the acquisition date of the initial 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Höegh LNG and the Partnership have entered into an option agreement pursuant to which the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the existing charter until July 2025. The Partnership exercised the option on February 27, 2020 and intends to enter into a new time charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant (the “Subsequent Charter”). The intangible for the option for time charter extension will be amortized on a straight line basis over the extension period starting at the beginning of the Subsequent Charter, subject to impairment testing for recoverability in the preceding periods.

Goodwill arises when an acquisition is accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the consideration over the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested annually for impairment of value and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Derivative instruments

Derivative instruments

All derivative instruments are initially recorded at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and are subsequently remeasured to fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the derivative. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss is dependent on whether the contract is designated as a hedging instrument and qualifies for hedge accounting.

For derivative instruments that are not designated or that do not qualify for hedge accounting, the changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recognized in earnings. In order to designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, formal documentation of the relationship between the derivative and the hedged item is required. This documentation includes the strategy and risk management objective for undertaking the hedge and the method that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the hedge.

Interest rate swaps are used for the management of interest rate risk exposure. The interest rate swaps have the effect of converting a portion of the outstanding debt from a floating to a fixed rate over the life of the transactions. As of January 1, 2019, the following accounting policies became effective for cash flow hedges of interest rate swaps.

For interest rate swaps qualifying as cash flow hedges, the fair value of the portion of the derivative instruments included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness ("hedge effectiveness") and the initial fair value of the hedge component excluded from hedge effectiveness are initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Subsequent changes in fair value for the portion of the derivative instruments included in hedge effectiveness are recorded in other comprehensive income. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings (interest expense is incurred for floating interest rate debt), those amounts are transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. The initial fair value component excluded from hedge effectiveness is amortized to earnings over the life of the hedging instrument. The amortization is recognized on the same line (interest expense) in the consolidated statement of income as the earnings effect of the hedged item. Any difference in the change in fair value of the hedge components excluded from hedge effectiveness and the amount recognized in earnings is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

Prospective and retrospective hedge effectiveness is assessed on an ongoing basis. If a cash flow hedge is no longer deemed highly effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. If a cash flow hedge for an interest rate swap is terminated and the originally hedged item is still considered probable of occurring, the gains and losses initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income remain there until the hedged item impacts earnings, at which point they are amortized to earnings on a systematic and rational basis to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. If the hedged items are no longer considered probable of occurring, amounts recognized in total equity are immediately transferred to interest expense in the consolidated statement of income. Cash flows from derivative instruments that are accounted for as cash flow hedges are classified in the same category as the cash flows from the items being hedged.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges were initially recorded in other comprehensive income as a component of total equity. Any hedge ineffectiveness was recognized immediately in earnings, as were any gains and losses or amortization on the portion of the derivative instruments that were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. In the periods when the hedged items affect earnings, those amounts were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to the gain (loss) on derivative instruments line in the consolidated statement of income.

Deferred debt issuance costs and fair value of debt assumed

Deferred debt issuance costs and fair value of debt assumed

Debt issuance costs, including arrangement fees and legal expenses, are deferred and presented as a direct deduction from the outstanding principal of the related debt in the consolidated balance sheet and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of debt issuance costs is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the deferred debt issuance costs is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

The discount or premium arising in a business combination for the difference in the fair value of the debt assumed compared to the outstanding principal is reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct adjustment to the outstanding principal of the related debt and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of fair value of the debt assumed is included as a component of interest expense. If a loan or part of a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the discount or premium is recognized as interest expense proportionate to the amount of the early repayment in the period in which the loan is repaid.

Use of estimates

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates subject to such estimates and assumptions include revenue recognition, purchase price allocation, the useful lives of vessels, drydocking, loss contingencies and the value of derivative instruments.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

 

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements

Leases: In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued revised guidance for leasing, Leases, that amends the accounting guidance on leases for both lessors and lessees. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard using the optional transition method to apply the new standard at the transition date of January 1, 2019 with no retrospective adjustments to prior periods. Consequently, the accounting and disclosures for the prior periods continue to be presented in accordance with the previous standard for leases. The Partnership elected the package of practical expedients and has not reassessed conclusions under the previous standard about whether any expired or existing contracts are, or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs for any existing leases. In addition, the election to use hindsight when determining lease term for modifications to existing leases at the transition date was applied. The Partnership adopted an accounting policy to apply the short-term lease expedient as a lessee for leases under 12‑months. This includes classes of leases for office equipment, office premises and vehicles used for administrative purposes, as well as, short-term leases of equipment used for projects, drydocking or maintenance associated with the vessels.

The Partnership is the lessor for time charters for its FSRUs. There were no changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized and, therefore, no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessor accounting. Additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures are required and have been implemented for reporting periods beginning as of January 1, 2019, while prior periods are not adjusted and continue to be reported under the previous accounting standards. Refer to note 5 for the qualitative and quantitative disclosures provided. As of January 1, 2019, cash payments received for the principal portion of the financing lease are presented as an operating cash inflow rather than as an investing cash inflow as presented for prior periods in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

The Partnership does not have material lease assets. Adoption of the new standard resulted in recording at a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheet for operating leases of $0.15 million and $0.15 million, respectively, as of December 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings of initially applying the standard related to the lessee accounting. As of December 31, 2019, the right-of-use asset and the lease liability for operating leases was $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The right-of-use asset is included as a component of other equipment in the consolidated balance sheet. The current and long-term lease liabilities are included as components of accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively.

Derivatives and Hedging: In August 2017, the FASB issued revised guidance for Derivatives and Hedging, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The entire change in fair value of the cash flow hedge included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness is included in other comprehensive income with the result that the hedge ineffectiveness is no longer recognized in earnings. Those amounts are reclassified to earnings in the same income statement line as the hedged item when hedged item affects earnings. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new standard on a prospective basis which had no material impact for accounting for cash flow hedges for the Partnership’s interest rate swaps. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings from initial application of the standard. However, certain amounts reclassified or recorded to earnings were reported as a component of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared with the presentation in previous periods in the gain (loss) on the derivative instruments line in the consolidated statements of income. In addition, the new disclosure requirements were applied on a prospective basis in note 17.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued revised guidance for Financial Instruments — Credit Losses:Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The revised guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodlogy that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This revised guidance is effective for the Partnership from January 1, 2020, with a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued revised guidance for Intangibles – Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the test for Goodwill Impirment.  The revised guidance simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The revised guidance is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and the Partnership will adopt the standard from January 1, 2020. The adoption of the standard will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. The recorded amount of the Partnership’s goodwill is $0.3 million as of December 31, 2019. Refer to note 12.

In Decenber 2019, FASB issued revised guidance for Income Taxes – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The revised guidance eliminates certain exceptions to the guidance related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in interim or annual periods for which public business entities have not yet issued financial statements. The Partnership is evaluating the impact of this revised guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
8.75% Series A Preferred Units [Member]
Common units public [Member]
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]
AOCI Attributable to Parent [Member]
Non-controlling interest [Member]
Total
Balance at Dec. 31, 2016 $ 0 $ 321,091 $ 6,849 $ 42,586 $ (5,736) $ 0 $ 364,790
Non-controlling interest acquired from the purchase of the Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 0 0 0 88,561 88,561
Net income 2,480 24,217 3,055 19,030 0 10,408 59,190
Cash distributions to unitholders 0 (30,039) (3,741) (23,257) 0 0 (57,037)
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest 0 0 0 0 0 (9,457) (9,457)
Cash contribution from Hoegh LNG 0 0 315 1,760 0 0 2,075
Refund of indemnification received from Hoegh LNG 0 0 (213) (1,321) 0 0 (1,534)
Other comprehensive income 0 0 0 0 2,602 386 2,988
Net proceeds from public offering and issuance of Series A preferred units 110,924 0 0 0 0 0 110,924
Acquisition of non-controlling interest from the purchase of the Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 0 0 0 (89,898) (89,898)
Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid 0 1,528 183 1,139 386 0 3,236
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 0 189 0 0 0 0 189
Other and contributions from owners 0 163 65 404 0 0 632
Balance at Dec. 31, 2017 113,404 317,149 6,513 40,341 (2,748) 0 474,659
Net income 12,303 34,409 4,257 26,653 0 0 77,622
Cash distributions to unitholders (13,107) (31,211) (3,881) (24,298) 0 0 (72,497)
Cash contribution from Hoegh LNG 0 0 234 1,467 0 0 1,701
Refund of indemnification received from Hoegh LNG 0 0 (325) (2,028) 0 0 (2,353)
Other comprehensive income 0 0 0 0 (2,589) 0 (2,589)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units 0 4,563 0 0 0 0 4,563
Net proceeds from public offering and issuance of Series A preferred units 38,659 0 0 0 0 0 38,659
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 0 200 0 0 0 0 200
Other and contributions from owners 0 140 46 286 0 0 472
Balance at Dec. 31, 2018 151,259 325,250 6,844 42,421 (5,337) 0 520,437
Net income 13,850 20,186 12,973 5,732 0 0 52,741
Cash distributions to unitholders (13,692) (31,663) (10,051) (18,398) 0 0 (73,804)
Refund of indemnification received from Hoegh LNG 0 0 (9) (55) 0 0 (64)
Conversion of subordinated units to common units 0 0 29,837 (29,837) 0 0 0
Other comprehensive income 0 0 0 0 (12,606) 0 (12,606)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units 0 1,029 0 0 0 0 1,029
Net proceeds from public offering and issuance of Series A preferred units 13,065 0 0 0 0 0 13,065
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 0 194 0 0 0 0 194
Other and contributions from owners 0 180 201 137 0 0 518
Balance at Dec. 31, 2019 $ 164,482 $ 315,176 $ 39,795 $ 0 $ (17,943) $ 0 $ 501,510
v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
REVENUES      
Time charter revenues $ 145,321 $ 144,952 $ 143,531
Other revenue 115 1,609 0
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531
OPERATING EXPENSES      
Vessel operating expenses (30,870) (24,195) (23,791)
Construction contract expenses 0 0 (151)
Administrative expenses (9,861) (8,916) (9,910)
Depreciation and amortization (21,477) (21,146) (21,054)
Total operating expenses (62,208) (54,257) (54,906)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139
Operating income (loss) 89,306 110,242 93,764
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE), NET      
Interest income 947 725 500
Interest expense (27,692) (26,814) (30,085)
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment 1,030 0 0
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 4,681 2,463
Other items, net (3,575) (2,907) (3,574)
Total financial income (expense), net (29,290) (24,315) (30,696)
Income (loss) before tax 60,016 85,927 63,068
Income tax benefit (expense) (7,275) (8,305) (3,878)
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190
Non-controlling interest in net income 0 0 10,408
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 13,850 12,303 2,480
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss) 38,891 65,319 46,302
Common units public [Member]      
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE), NET      
Net income (loss) $ 20,186 $ 34,409 $ 24,217
Earnings per unit      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 1.12 $ 1.93 $ 1.37
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE), NET      
Net income (loss) $ 12,973 $ 4,257 $ 3,055
Earnings per unit      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 1.84 $ 2.03 $ 1.44
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
FINANCIAL INCOME (EXPENSE), NET      
Net income (loss) $ 5,732 $ 26,653 $ 19,030
Earnings per unit      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 0.70 $ 2.03 $ 1.45
v3.20.1
Accrued liabilities and other payables
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accrued liabilities and other payables  
Accrued liabilities and payables

14.   Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Accrued operating and administrative expenses

 

$

3,314

 

$

3,004

Accrued property tax

 

 

3,033

 

 

 —

Accrued interest

 

 

2,850

 

 

 —

Current tax payable

 

 

818

 

 

1,375

Refund liabilities (note 5)

 

 

125

 

 

1,834

Current portion of advance for refundable value added tax

 

 

 —

 

 

429

Lease liability (note 2 and note 11)

 

 

75

 

 

 —

Other accruals and payables

 

 

949

 

 

816

Total accrued liabilities and other payables

 

$

11,164

 

$

7,458

 

Refer to note 5 for additional information on the refund liability to charterers. During 2019, the advance from the charterer for refundable value added tax was fully repaid. On January 1, 2019, the Partnership adopted the new leasing standard. Refer to notes 2 and 11.

v3.20.1
Commitments and contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Commitments and contingencies  
Commitments and contingencies

18.   Commitments and contingencies

Contractual commitments

As of December 31, 2019, there were no material contractual purchase commitments.

Claims and Contingencies

Joint ventures claims and accruals

Under the Neptune and the Cape Ann time charters, the joint ventures undertake to ensure that the vessel meets specified performance standards at all times during the term of the time charters. The performance standards include the vessel not exceeding a maximum average daily boil-off of LNG, subject to certain contractual exclusions, as specified in the time charter. Pursuant to the charters, the hire rate is subject to deduction by the charterer by, among other things, sums due in respect of the joint ventures’ failure to satisfy the specified performance standards during the period. The charterer requested that the joint ventures calculate and present the boil-off since the beginning of the charters, compared with maximum average daily boil-off allowed under the time charter. The charters for the Neptune and Cape Ann started in 2009 and 2010, respectively. On September 8, 2017, the charterer notified the joint ventures that it was formally making a claim for compensation in accordance with the provisions of the charters for a stated quantity of LNG exceeding the maximum average daily boil-off since the beginning for the charters. The claim asserted a gross amount of compensation of $58 million for the excess boil-off volume but the claim recognized that the calculations for the amount required adjustment for allowable exclusions under the charters. Accruals are recorded for loss contingencies or claims when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. As of September 30, 2017, the joint ventures determined the liability associated with the boil-off claim was probable and could be reasonably estimated resulting in a total accrual of $23.7 million which was recorded as a reduction of time charter revenues in the third quarter of 2017. The Partnership’s  50% share of the accrual was approximately $11.9 million, which remained unchanged as of December 31, 2017. As a precaution, the joint ventures have suspended payments on their shareholder loans as of September 30, 2017 pending the outcome of the boil-off claim. Refer to note 10. The charterer and the joint ventures referred the claim to arbitration. The charterer’s claim as submitted in the arbitration request was for a gross amount of $52 million, covering a shorter time period for the time period for the first performance period as defined in the time charters, as well as interest and expenses. The charterer reserved it right to make a further claim with respect to subsequent performance periods. Subsequently, the charterer and the joint ventures asked the arbitration tribunal for a partial determination on certain key contractual interpretations and the proceedings commenced in November 2018.

In March 2019, the tribunal’s determination was received. The determination did not cover all the questions of contractual interpretation on which there is disagreement between the parties. With the exception of one issue, the tribunal’s conclusions on the contractual interpretations were unambiguous. For the remaining issue related to the calculation of a deduction from the gross claim, the tribunal did not specify how the deduction should be determined. As a result, there remained significant uncertainty in the evaluation of the potential outcome of the boil-off claim. Based on the tribunal’s determination, the joint ventures updated their estimates to cover the period from the start of the time charters to December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the range of estimates is not directly comparable to the $52 million gross claim initially raised by the charterer through the end of the defined performance period. Depending on interpretations of the tribunal’s determination for the deduction to the gross claim and the other disputed contractual provisions, the joint ventures estimate that their aggregate liability associated with the boil-off claim is in the millions of dollars and could range between the mid-to-upper teens to the mid-$30’s, of which the Partnership’s share would be 50%. Based upon the additional information from the tribunal’s determination and updated estimates of the potential range of liability, the joint ventures concluded the existing accrual of $23.7 million continued to represent their best estimate of the probable liability as of December 31, 2018. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2018. The Partnership’s  50% share of the accrual remained at approximately $11.9 million as of December 31, 2018.

On June 14, 2019, the charterer served an updated claim submission for approximately $54 million to the tribunal, incorporating claims for the second performance period and certain other claims. The owners did not agree with the charterer’s claims or its interpretation of the deduction to the gross claim in accordance with the tribunal’s determination. The joint ventures assessed the additional information available and updated the estimates for the potential range of outcomes for each quarter during 2019.The joint ventures concluded the recorded accrual continued to be the best estimate within the range.

The parties have continued discussions with the objective of reaching a negotiated solution to settle the boil-off claim. In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached was subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Refer to note 23. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the effective date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims.

Höegh LNG and the other major owner guarantee the performance and payment obligations of the joint ventures under the time charters.

The Partnership will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for its share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement. The remaining costs to be incurred for the technical modifications of the vessels are estimated to be $0.8 million, of which the Partnership’s  50% share would be $0.4 million. Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for the Partnership’s share of such costs. For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Partnership received indemnification payments of $0.3 million from Höegh LNG, related to the boil-off claim. Indemnification payments were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 15.

Indonesian corporate income tax

Based upon the Partnership’ s experience in Indonesia, tax regulations, guidance and interpretation in Indonesia may not always be clear and may be subject to alternative interpretations or changes in interpretations over time. The Partnership's Indonesian subsidiary is subject to examination by the Indonesian tax authorities for the years from 2015 through 2018 for up to five years following the completion of a fiscal year.  As a result, it is likely there will be an examination by the Indonesian tax authorities for the tax return for 2015 during 2020. For December 31, 2019, the Indonesian subsidiary plans to request a refund for overpayment of estimated taxes for 2019 when filing the 2019 tax return which will result in an automatic examination of the tax return for the year ended December 31, 2019. The examinations may lead to ordinary course adjustments or proposed adjustments to the Partnership’s taxes with respect to years under examination. In December 2018, the examination for the years 2013 and 2014 was completed. Refer to note 7 for additional information. Future examinations may or may not result in changes to the Partnership’ s provisions on tax filings from 2015 through 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions were $2.3 million.

Indonesian property tax

The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary was assessed for Land and Building tax (“property tax”) and penalties of $3.0 million by the Indonesian authorities for the period from 2015 through 2019. The assessment was due to the issuance of the Indonesian Minister of Finance’s Decree No. 186/PMK.03/2019 (“PMK 186/2019”) which defines FSRUs as a “Building” subject to the tax. The Partnership’s Indonesian subsidiary plans to appeal the assessment. Depending on the level of appeal pursued, the appeal process could take a number of years to conclude. There can be no assurance of the result of the appeal or whether the Indonesian subsidiary will prevail. As a result, the property tax and penalties were expensed for the year ended December 31, 2019. Until the appeal is concluded, the Indonesian subsidiary will be required to pay an annual property tax of approximately $0.6 million. Property tax and penalties were reported as a component of vessel operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2019.

PGN LNG claims including delay liquidated damages

The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for i) any hire rate payments not received under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on August 12, 2014 through the acceptance date of the PGN FSRU Lampung and ii) non-budgeted expenses (including warranty costs associated with repairs of the Mooring) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project prior to the date of acceptance, and for iii) certain subsequently incurred non-budgeted costs and expenses.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for non-budgeted expenses (including warranty provisions, other non-budgeted expenses and replacement capital expenditure) of $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which were recorded as a contribution to equity. Indemnification payments received from Höegh LNG are subject to repayment to the extent the amounts are subsequently recovered from insurance or deemed reimbursable by the charterer.

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to insurance proceeds received related to the warranty provision and costs for previous years determined to be reimbursable by the charterer. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $2.5 million related to previously recognized revenue from 2014 that was deemed reimbursable in 2017 and an additional cost recovery of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a cash distribution from equity. Refer to note 15.

Höegh Gallant claims and indemnification

In the third quarter of 2017, the Partnership began investigating with EgyptCo a performance measure included in EgyptCo’s charter with respect to the Höegh Gallant. The investigation included whether such a performance measure is directly linked to a specified performance standard which could result in a customer claim for reduced hire or damages and legal basis for a potential claim, if any. No accrual was recorded. In October 2018, EgyptCo reached an agreement with EgyptCo’s charterer that there would be no reduction in hire for this performance measure.

The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the time charter with EgyptCo (including technical issues) incurred in connection with the Höegh Gallant.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the time charter with EgyptCo of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 15.

v3.20.1
Accrued liabilities and other payables (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accrued liabilities and other payables  
Summary of accrued liabilities and payables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Accrued operating and administrative expenses

 

$

3,314

 

$

3,004

Accrued property tax

 

 

3,033

 

 

 —

Accrued interest

 

 

2,850

 

 

 —

Current tax payable

 

 

818

 

 

1,375

Refund liabilities (note 5)

 

 

125

 

 

1,834

Current portion of advance for refundable value added tax

 

 

 —

 

 

429

Lease liability (note 2 and note 11)

 

 

75

 

 

 —

Other accruals and payables

 

 

949

 

 

816

Total accrued liabilities and other payables

 

$

11,164

 

$

7,458

 

v3.20.1
Advances to joint ventures (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Advances to joint ventures  
Schedule of advances to joint ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Current portion of advances to joint ventures

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Long-term advances to joint ventures

 

 

3,831

 

 

3,536

Advances/shareholder loans to joint ventures

 

$

3,831

 

$

3,536

 

v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances - Minimum contractual future revenues (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Time charter revenues and related contract balances    
2020 $ 24,880  
2021 19,703  
2022 19,703  
2023 19,703  
2024 19,703  
Thereafter 116,386  
Total - undiscounted 220,078  
2020 71,100  
2021 59,903  
2022 59,903  
2023 59,903  
2024 59,903  
Thereafter 346,369  
Total - undiscounted 657,081  
Operating lease 223,644  
Financing lease 433,437  
Discounting effect (193,437)  
Financing lease 240,000 $ 247,488
2020 95,980  
2021 79,606  
2022 79,606  
2023 79,606  
2024 79,606  
Thereafter 462,755  
Total - undiscounted $ 877,159  
v3.20.1
Financial Instruments - Loan receivables by type of borrower (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]    
Amounts due from affiliate $ 4,296 $ 4,328
Advances/ loans to joint ventures 3,831 3,536
Payment activity [Member] | Performing Financial Instruments [Member]    
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment [Line Items]    
Trade receivable 735 1,228
Amounts due from affiliate 4,296 4,328
Advances/ loans to joint ventures $ 3,831 $ 3,536
v3.20.1
Earning per unit and cash distributions - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Mar. 21, 2019
Sep. 14, 2018
Jun. 03, 2016
Mar. 21, 2019
Mar. 23, 2018
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution           $ 1,597 $ 1,591 $ 1,141
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution           $ 688 1,372 983
Phantom Units [Member] | Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Options, Grants in Period, Gross 10,917 28,018 21,500 10,917 14,584      
Second Target Distribution [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution Per Unit           $ 0.421875    
Distribution Percentage To All Unit Holders           85.00%    
Distribution Percentage To Holders Of Incentive Distribution Rights           15.00%    
Third Target Distribution [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution Per Unit           $ 0.506250    
Distribution Percentage To All Unit Holders           75.00%    
Distribution Percentage To Holders Of Incentive Distribution Rights           25.00%    
After Target Distribution [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Distribution Percentage To All Unit Holders           50.00%    
Distribution Percentage To Holders Of Incentive Distribution Rights           50.00%    
Common units public [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution Per Unit           $ 0.388125    
Distribution Percentage To Holders Of Incentive Distribution Rights           100.00%    
Common units Hoegh LNG [Member]                
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]                
Incentive Distribution Right Target Distribution           $ 908 $ 219 $ 158
v3.20.1
Business combinations - Acquisition of the non-controlling interest (Details)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
USD ($)
Business combinations  
Cash portion of purchase price $ 45,300
Revolving credit facility draw 40,600
Revolving credit facility draw for working capital adjustment 762
Total consideration 86,662
49% Assets acquired 181,420
49% Liabilities assumed (91,522)
Total identifiable net assets 89,898
Non-controlling interest acquired 89,898
Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid (3,236)
Impact of acquisition of non-controlling interest on equity $ 88,561
v3.20.1
Long-term debt - Additional information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
1 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Jan. 29, 2019
Sep. 30, 2013
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Related Commitment Fees and Debt Issuance Costs   $ 381 $ 37 $ 977    
Loan Covenant, Security Maintenance Percentage to Loans Outstanding   125.00%        
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity   $ 385,000        
Repayments of Debt   34,000 17,500 58,705    
Revolving credit due to owners and affiliates repayment   34,000        
Payments of arrangement fees   $ 5,797 $ 0 $ 0    
Hoegh LNG Partners LP [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Covenant Description   The Partnership must maintainConsolidated book equity (excluding hedge reserves and mark to market value of derivatives) equal to the greater of25% of total assets, and$150 millionConsolidated working capital (current assets, excluding intercompany receivables and marked-to-market value of any financial derivative, less current liabilities, excluding intercompany payables, marked-to-market value of any financial derivative and the current portion of long-term debt) shall at all time be greater than zeroMinimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents and available draws under a bank credit facility for a term of more than 12 months) equal to the greater of$15 million, and$2.5 million multiplied by the number of vessels owned or leased by the Partnership (prorated for partial ownership), subject to a cap of $20 millionA ratio of combined EBITDA for the Vessel Owners to debt service (principal repayments, guarantee commission, commitment fees and interest expense) for the preceding twelve months of a minimum of 115%        
Lampung Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt, Weighted Average Interest Rate   6.20% 5.90%      
Gallant And Grace Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Repayments of Debt $ 303,200          
Repayments of Accrued interest 1,600          
$385 Million Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity         $ 320,000  
Repayments of Debt 303,200          
Repayments of Accrued interest 1,600          
Payments of arrangement fees 5,500          
Remaining proceeds used for general partnership purposes $ 9,600          
Export credit tranche [Member] | Hegh Gallant [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage 3.98%          
Export credit tranche [Member] | Hegh Grace [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Interest Rate, Stated Percentage 3.88%          
Export credit tranche [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Description of Variable Rate Basis   The interest rate for the export credit tranche is LIBOR plus a margin of 2.3%.        
Line of Credit Facility, Frequency of Payments   The export credit tranche is repayable in quarterly installments over 12 years        
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate   2.30%        
Export credit tranche [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Future repayment upon maturity of commercial tranche $ 9,500          
FSRU tranche [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Description of Variable Rate Basis   The FSRU tranche has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.4%.        
Line of Credit Facility, Frequency of Payments   The FSRU tranche is repayable quarterly over 7 years        
Debt Instrument, Balloon Payment   $ 16,500        
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate   3.40%        
Commercial tranche [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt, Weighted Average Interest Rate   4.70%        
Secured Debt [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Covenant Description   The primary financial covenants under the Lampung facility are as follows:Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 for the preceding nine-month period tested on each quarterly repayment date;Guarantor's book equity must be greater than the higher of (i) $200 million and (ii) 25% of total assets; andGuarantor's free liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents or available draws on credit facilities) must be greater than $20 million.        
Term Loan Facility [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Secured Debt           $ 299,000
385 million Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt Instrument, Description of Variable Rate Basis LIBOR plus a margin of 2.30%          
Line of Credit Facility, Frequency of Payments The commercial tranche is repayable quarterly with a final balloon payment of $136.1          
Debt Instrument, Basis Spread on Variable Rate 2.30%          
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 385,000          
Amount drew $ 320,000          
Line of Credit Facility, Unused Capacity, Commitment Fee Percentage 1.60%          
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Debt, Weighted Average Interest Rate   6.60% 6.30%      
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity   $ 85,000        
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity         $ 63,000  
Amount drew $ 48,300          
Revolving Credit Facility Due To Owners And Affiliates [Member]            
Debt Instrument [Line Items]            
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 85,000          
v3.20.1
Related party transactions - Receivables and payables from related parties (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Related party transactions    
Amounts due from affiliates $ 4,296 $ 4,328
Amounts due to owners and affiliates $ 2,513 $ 2,301
v3.20.1
Schedule I - CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 85,252 $ 91,681 $ 79,947
INVESTING ACTIVITIES      
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (269) 3,067 (38,450)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES      
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units 13,065 38,659 110,924
Net proceeds from issuance of common units 1,029 4,563 0
Proceeds from long term debt 368,300 0 0
Repayment of long-term debt (342,416) (45,458) (45,458)
Repayment of debt issuance cost (5,797) 0 0
Repayment of amounts due to owners and affiliates (34,000) (17,500) (58,705)
Proceeds from indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG 0 1,701 2,075
Repayment of indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG (64) (2,353) (1,534)
Cash distributions to limited partners (73,804) (72,497) (57,037)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (70,625) (92,478) (39,340)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 14,358 2,270 2,157
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 45,454 43,281 41,124
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period 59,819 45,454 43,281
Reportable Legal Entities | Parent Company      
OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 33,130 42,401 6,862
INVESTING ACTIVITIES      
Long-term loan due from subsidiaries (286,233) 0 0
Expenditure for purchase of Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 (137,475)
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash designated for purchase of the Hegh Grace entities 0 0 91,768
Proceeds from investment in subsidiaries 0 0 12,202
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (286,233) 0 (33,505)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES      
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units 13,065 38,659 110,924
Net proceeds from issuance of common units 1,029 4,563 0
Proceeds from long term debt 368,300 0 0
Proceeds from loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates 3,500 5,400 25,730
Repayment of long-term debt (19,198) 0 0
Repayment of debt issuance cost (5,797) 0 0
Repayment of amounts due to owners and affiliates (34,000) (17,500) (58,705)
Proceeds from indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG 0 1,701 2,075
Repayment of indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG (64) (2,353) (1,534)
Cash distributions to limited partners (73,804) (72,497) (57,037)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 253,031 (42,027) 21,453
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (72) 374 (5,190)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 7,006 6,632 11,822
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 6,934 $ 7,006 $ 6,632
v3.20.1
Segment information - Additional information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 01, 2017
Jan. 01, 2017
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 385,000        
Property tax and penalties 3,000        
Construction contract expenses 0 $ 0 $ 151    
Other [Member]          
Construction contract expenses     $ 200    
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]          
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired     49.00% 49.00% 51.00%
Hoegh Grace entities [Member] | Consolidated Entities [Member]          
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired         51.00%
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]          
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity 85,000        
$385 Million Facility [Member]          
Line of Credit Facility, Maximum Borrowing Capacity $ 385,000        
Neptune And Cape Ann [Member]          
Equity Method Investment, Ownership Percentage 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%    
v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net income (loss) $ 52,741 $ 77,622 $ 59,190
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:      
Depreciation and amortization 21,477 21,146 21,054
Equity in (earnings) losses of joint ventures (6,078) (17,938) (5,139)
Changes in accrued interest income on advances to joint ventures (295) (273) 3,955
Amortization of deferred debt issuance cost and fair value of debt assumed 2,361 700 828
Amortization in revenue for above market contract 3,631 3,631 3,631
Expenditure for drydocking (3,107) 0 0
Gain (loss) on debt extinguishment (1,030) 0 0
Changes in accrued interest expense 2,246 (605) 218
Receipts from repayment of principal on direct financing lease 4,168 0 0
Unrealized foreign exchange losses (gains) 360 181 908
Gain (loss) on the settlement of the derivatives (199) 0 0
Proceeds from settlement of derivatives 1,398 0 0
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments 21 (4,681) (2,463)
Non-cash revenue: tax paid directly by charterer (867) (852) (861)
Non-cash income tax expense: tax paid directly by charterer 867 852 861
Deferred tax expense and provision for tax uncertainty 3,707 5,272 1,614
Issuance of units for Board of Directors' fees 194 200 189
Other adjustments 512 472 632
Changes in working capital:      
Trade receivables 543 6,344 (1,035)
Inventory 183 22 29
Prepaid expenses and other receivables (2,081) (72) 188
Trade payables (10) 155 (804)
Amounts due to owners and affiliates 244 842 (628)
Value added and withholding tax liability 2,827 4,257 4,519
Accrued liabilities and other payables 1,439 (5,594) (6,939)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 85,252 91,681 79,947
INVESTING ACTIVITIES      
Expenditure for purchase of Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 (137,475)
Cash acquired in the purchase of the Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 3,793
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash designated for purchase of the Hoegh Grace entities 0 0 91,768
Expenditure for vessel and other equipment (269) (747) (21)
Receipts from repayment of principal on direct financing lease 0 3,814 3,485
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (269) 3,067 (38,450)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES      
Proceeds from long term debt 368,300 0 0
Proceeds from revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates 3,500 5,400 25,730
Repayment of long-term debt (342,416) (45,458) (45,458)
Payment of debt issuance costs (5,797) 0 0
Repayment of revolving credit facility due to owners and affiliates (34,000) (17,500) (58,705)
Repayment of customer loan for funding of value added liability on import (438) (4,993) (5,878)
Net proceeds from issuance of common units 1,029 4,563 0
Net proceeds from issuance of Series A preferred units 13,065 38,659 110,924
Cash distributions to limited partners and preferred unitholders (73,804) (72,497) (57,037)
Cash distributions to non-controlling interest 0 0 (9,457)
Proceeds from indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG 0 1,701 2,075
Repayment of indemnifications received from Hoegh LNG (64) (2,353) (1,534)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (70,625) (92,478) (39,340)
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 14,358 2,270 2,157
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash 7 (97) 0
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period 45,454 43,281 41,124
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 59,819 $ 45,454 $ 43,281
v3.20.1
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Statement of Comprehensive Income [Abstract]      
Net income (loss) $ 52,741 $ 77,622 $ 59,190
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedge (12,217) (2,290) 3,335
Income tax benefit (expense) (389) (299) (347)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (12,606) (2,589) 2,988
Comprehensive income (loss) 40,135 75,033 62,178
Non-controlling interest in comprehensive income 0 0 10,794
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 13,850 12,303 2,480
Partners' interest in comprehensive income (loss) $ 26,285 $ 62,730 $ 48,904
v3.20.1
Related party transactions
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Related party transactions  
Related party transactions

15.   Related party transactions

Income (expenses) from related parties

As described in Related party agreements below, subsidiaries of Höegh LNG have provided administrative services to the Partnership and ship management and/or technical support services for the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace.

 

Amounts included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 or included in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Revenues

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant (1)

 

$

47,173

 

47,108

 

$

46,382

Time charter and construction contract revenues indemnified by/refunded to Höegh LNG (2)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(2,496)

Operating expenses

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Vessel operating expenses (3)

 

 

(24,523)

 

(21,520)

 

 

(21,124)

Hours, travel expense and overhead (4) and Board of Directors’ fees (5)

 

 

(4,072)

 

(3,671)

 

 

(3,284)

Financial (income) expense

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Interest income from joint ventures (6)

 

 

295

 

273

 

 

370

Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG (7)

 

 

(1,882)

 

(2,938)

 

 

(3,934)

Total

 

$

 16,991

 

19,252

 

$

15,914

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

Balance sheet

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Equity

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash contribution from Höegh LNG (8)

 

$

 —

 

$

1,701

Repayment of indemnification received from Höegh LNG (8)

 

 

(64)

 

 

(2,353)

Issuance of units for Board of Directors’ fees (5)

 

 

194

 

 

200

Other and contribution from owner (9)

 

 

485

 

 

472

Total

 

$

615

 

$

20


1)

Time charter revenue Höegh Gallant: A subsidiary of Höegh LNG, EgyptCo, leases the Höegh Gallant.

2)

Time charter revenues indemnified by/ refunded to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG certain previous indemnification payments in 2017.

3)

Vessel operating expenses: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provides ship management of vessels, including crews and the provision of all other services and supplies.

4)

Hours, travel expenses and overhead: Subsidiaries of Höegh LNG provide management, accounting, bookkeeping and administrative support under administrative service agreements. These services are charges based upon the actual hours incurred for each individual as registered in the time-write system based on a rate which includes a provision for overhead and any associated travel expenses.

5)

Board of Directors’ fees: Total Board of Directors’ fees were $496,  $501 and $467 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Part of the compensation is awarded as common units of the Partnership. Effective June 4, 2019, a total of 11,180 common units of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $194 for part of directors’ fees for 2019 under the Höegh LNG Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan. Effective June 6, 2018 and May 22, 2017, a total of 11,050 and 9,805 common units, respectively, of the Partnership were awarded to non-employee directors as compensation of $200 and $189, respectively, for part of directors’ fees for 2018 and 2017. The awards were recorded as administrative expense and as an issuance of common units. Common units are recorded when issued.

6)

Interest income from joint ventures: The Partnership and its joint venture partners have provided subordinated financing to the joint ventures as shareholder loans. Interest income for the Partnership’s shareholder loans to the joint ventures is recorded as interest income.

7)

Interest expense and commitment fees to Höegh LNG and affiliates: Höegh LNG and its affiliates provided an $85 million revolving credit facility for general partnership purposes. The Partnership incurred a commitment fee on the undrawn balance until January 29, 2018 and an interest expense on the drawn balance. A seller’s credit note to finance part of the Höegh Gallant acquisition incurred interest expense until it was repaid in October 2017.

8)

Cash contribution from/ distribution to Höegh LNG: As described under “Indemnifications” below, Höegh LNG made indemnification payments to the Partnership or received refunds of indemnification from the Partnership which were recorded as contributions or distributions to equity.

9)

Other and contribution from owner: Höegh LNG granted share-based incentives to certain key employees whose services benefit the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as administrative expenses and as a contribution from owner since the Partnership is not invoiced for this employee benefit. Effective March 21, 2019 and September 14, 2018, the Partnership granted or extended the terms for 10,917 and 28,018 phantom units, respectively, to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership. Related expenses are recorded as an administrative expense and as increase in equity.

Acquisitions from Höegh LNG: Effective January 1, 2017 and December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired a 51% and a 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities from Höegh LNG. Refer to note 3. The Partnership’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Conflicts Committee of the Board (the “Conflicts Committee”) approved the purchase prices for the acquisitions. The Conflicts Committee retained financial advisors to assist with its evaluation of the transactions.

Dividends to Höegh LNG: The Partnership has declared and paid quarterly distributions totaling $28.4 million, $28.2 million and $27.0 million to Höegh LNG for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Receivables and payables from related parties

Amounts due from affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Amounts due from affiliates

 

$

4,296

 

$

4,328

 

The amount due from affiliates is a receivable for time charter hire from a subsidiary of Höegh LNG, EgyptCo, for the Höegh Gallant time charter. The time charter hire is due 18 days from the receipt of the invoice. Time charter hire is invoiced at the end of the month in arrears.

Amounts, loans and promissory note due to owners and affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

$

2,513

 

$

2,301

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounts due to owners and affiliates principally relate to trade payables for services provided by subsidiaries of Höegh LNG.

Revolving credit facility

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

    

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

Revolving credit facility

 

$

8,792

 

$

39,292

 

In August 2014, upon the closing of the IPO, the Partnership entered into an $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG, to be used to fund acquisitions and working capital requirements of the Partnership. The credit facility is unsecured and was repayable on January 1, 2020. On May 28, 2019, the repayment date on the $85 million revolving credit facility was extended to January 1, 2023 and the terms amended for the interest rate to be LIBOR plus a margin of 1.4% in 2019,  3.0% in 2020 and 4.0% thereafter. The outstanding revolving credit facility had a weighted average interest rate for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 of 6.6% and 6.3%, respectively

Related party agreements

In connection with the IPO the Partnership entered into several agreements including:

(i)

An $85 million revolving credit facility with Höegh LNG, which was undrawn at the closing of the IPO;

(ii)

An omnibus agreement with Höegh LNG, the general partner, and Höegh LNG Partners Operating LLC (the “operating company”) governing, among other things:

a.

To what extent the Partnership and Höegh LNG may compete with each other;

b.

The Partnership’s rights of first offer on certain FSRUs and LNG carriers operating under charters of five or more years; and

c.

Höegh LNG’s provision of certain indemnities to the Partnership.

(iii)

An administrative services agreement with Hoegh LNG Services Ltd., UK (“Höegh UK”), pursuant to which Höegh UK provided certain administrative services to the Partnership. This agreement expired during 2019; and

(iv)

Höegh UK entered into administrative services agreements with Höegh LNG AS (“Höegh Norway”) and Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited, pursuant to which Höegh Norway and Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited provided Höegh UK certain administrative services. Additionally, the operating company entered into an administrative services agreement with Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited to allow Leif Höegh (U.K.) Limited to provide services directly to the operating company. Each of these agreements expired, or were terminated by mutual agreement, during 2019.

Existing agreements remained in place following the IPO for provision of certain services to the Partnership’s vessel owning joint ventures or entity, of which the material agreements are as follows:

·

The joint ventures are parties to ship management agreements with Höegh LNG Fleet Management AS (“Höegh LNG Management”) pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides the joint ventures with technical and maritime management and crewing of the Neptune and the Cape Ann, and Höegh Norway is a party to a sub-technical support agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides technical support services with respect to the PGN FSRU Lampung; and

·

The joint ventures are parties to commercial and administration management agreements with Höegh Norway, and PT Hoegh LNG Lampung is a party to a technical information and services agreement with Höegh Norway.

Subsequent to the IPO, the Partnership has acquired vessel owning entities. Existing agreements remained in place following the acquisition for the time charter of the Höegh Gallant and receipt of certain services, of which the material agreements are as follows:

·

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch has a Lease and Maintenance Agreement (the “time charter”) with EgyptCo for the lease and maintenance of the Höegh Gallant and the provision of crew and certain ship management services for a combined daily hire rate. The time charter started in April 2015 with an expiration date in April 2020; and

·

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch is party to a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides the technical management of the Höegh Gallant, and Hoegh LNG Maritime Management Pte. Ltd. (“Höegh Maritime Management”) is a party to a secondment agreement, as amended, with Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited pursuant to which Höegh Maritime Management provides qualified crew for the Höegh Gallant;

·

Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited acting through its Egyptian Branch is party to a management agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides administrative, commercial and technical management services, each as instructed from time to time by Hoegh LNG Cyprus Limited.

Existing agreements remained in place for the time charter of the Höegh Grace following the acquisition and receipt of certain services, of which the material agreements are as follows:

·

a ship management agreement with Höegh LNG Management pursuant to which Höegh LNG Management provides technical and maritime management services;

·

a manning agreement with Höegh Fleet Services Philippines Inc. to recruit and engage crew for the vessel;

·

a technical services agreement with Höegh Norway to provide technical services for the vessel;

·

a management consulting agreement with Höegh Norway to provide support related to certain management activities;

·

a crew recruitment consulting services agreement with Höegh Maritime Management to provide professional consulting services in connection with recruitment of crew and other employees;

·

an agreement for provision of professional payment services with Höegh Maritime Management to provide services in connection with the payment of monthly salaries to the crew and employees working on the vessel; and

·

a spare parts procurement and insurance services agreement with Höegh LNG Management to arrange for the supply of spare parts and the insurance coverage for the vessel.

In December 2019, the Partnership and the operating company entered an administrative services agreement with Höegh Norway, pursuant to which Höegh Norway provides certain administrative services to the Partnership.

Indemnifications

Environmental indemnifications:

Under the omnibus agreement, Höegh LNG agreed to indemnify the Partnership until August 12, 2019 against certain environmental and toxic tort liabilities with respect to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership to the extent arising prior to the time they were contributed or sold to the Partnership. No indemnification claims were filed for environmental liabilities under the agreement prior to its expiration.

Other indemnifications:

Under the omnibus agreement Höegh LNG also agreed to indemnify the Partnership for losses:

1.

related to certain defects in title to the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership and any failure to obtain, prior to the time they were contributed to the Partnership, certain consents and permits necessary to conduct the business, which liabilities arose within three years after the closing of the IPO;

2.

related to certain tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the assets contributed or sold to the Partnership prior to the time they were contributed or sold;

3.

in the event that the Partnership did not receive hire rate payments under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for the period commencing on August 12, 2014 through the earlier of (i) the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung or (ii) the termination of such time charter. The Partnership was indemnified by Höegh LNG for the September and October 2014 invoices not paid by PGN LNG in 2014 (refer to note 18);

4.

with respect to any obligation to pay liquidated damages to PGN LNG under the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for failure to deliver the PGN FSRU Lampung by the scheduled delivery date set forth in the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter;

5.

with respect to any non-budgeted expenses (including repair costs) incurred in connection with the PGN FSRU Lampung project (including the construction of the Mooring) occurring prior to the date of acceptance of the PGN FSRU Lampung pursuant to the time charter; and

6.

pursuant to a letter agreement dated August 12, 2015, Höegh LNG confirmed that the indemnification provisions of the omnibus agreement include indemnification for all non-budgeted, non-creditable Indonesian value added taxes and non-budgeted Indonesian withholding taxes, including any related impact on cash flow from PT Hoegh LNG Lampung and interest and penalties associated with any non-timely Indonesian tax filings related to the ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring whether incurred (i) prior to the closing date of the IPO, (ii) after the closing date of the IPO to the extent such taxes, interest, penalties or related impact on cash flows relate to periods of ownership or operation of the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Mooring and are not subject to prior indemnification payments or deemed reimbursable by the charterer under its audit of the taxes related to the PGN FSRU Lampung time charter for periods up to and including June 30, 2015, or (iii) after June 30, 2015 to the extent withholding taxes exceed the minimum amount of withholding tax due under Indonesian tax regulations due to lack of documentation or untimely withholding tax filings.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for non-budgeted expenses (including warranty provisions, other non-budgeted expenses and replacement capital expenditure) of $0.9 million and $1.6 million, respectively, which were recorded as a contribution to equity. Indemnification payments received from Höegh LNG are subject to repayment to the extent the amounts are subsequently recovered from insurance or deemed reimbursable by the charterer.

For the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $0.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively, related to insurance proceeds received related to the warranty provision and costs for previous years determined to be reimbursable by the charterer. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Partnership refunded to Höegh LNG approximately $2.5 million related to previously recognized revenue from 2014 that was deemed reimbursable in 2017 and an additional cost recovery of $1.5 million, which was recorded as a cash distribution from equity. Refer to note 18.

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreement entered into with respect to the purchase of the Höegh Gallant entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

1.

losses from breach of warranty;

2.

losses related to certain environmental and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Gallant prior to the closing date;

3.

all capital gains tax or other export duty incurred in connection with the transfer of the Höegh Gallant outside of Höegh LNG Cyprus Limited’s permanent establishment in a Public Free Zone in Egypt;

4.

any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to Höegh LNG Management with respect to payroll taxes;

5.

any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with the commencement of services under the time charter with EgyptCo or EgyptCo’s time charter with EGAS; and

6.

liabilities under the Gallant/Grace facility not attributable to the Höegh Gallant.

Additionally, Höegh LNG has guaranteed the payment of hire by EgyptCo pursuant to the time charter for the Höegh Gallant under certain circumstances.

For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Partnership received indemnification payments from Höegh LNG for losses incurred in connection with the time charter with EgyptCo of $0.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 18.

Pursuant to an option agreement, the Partnership has the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025.

Under the contribution, purchase and sale agreements entered into with respect to the acquisitions of the 51% and 49% ownership interests in the Höegh Grace entities, Höegh LNG will indemnify the Partnership for:

1.

losses from breach of warranty;

2.

losses related to certain environmental liabilities, damages or repair costs and tax liabilities attributable to the operation of the Höegh Grace prior to the closing date;

3.

any recurring non-budgeted costs owed to tax authorities with respect to payroll taxes, taxes related to social security payments, corporate income taxes (including income tax for equality and surcharge on income tax for equality), withholding tax, port associations, local Cartagena tax, and financial transaction tax, including any penalties associated with taxes to the extent not reimbursed by the charterer;

4.

any non-budgeted losses suffered or incurred in connection with commencement of services under the Höegh Grace charter with SPEC; and

5.

any losses suffered or incurred in relation to the performance guarantee the Partnership provided with respect to the Höegh Grace charter, up to Höegh LNG’s pro rata share of such losses, based on its remaining ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. This provision is not applicable after December 1, 2019, when the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

On September 27, 2017, the Partnership entered into an indemnification agreement with Höegh LNG with respect to the boil-off claims under the Neptune and Cape Ann time charters, pursuant to which Höegh LNG will, among other things, indemnify the Partnership for its share of any losses and expenses related to or arising from the failure of either Neptune or Cape Ann to meet the performance standards related to the daily boil-off of LNG under their respective time charters (including any cash impact that may result from any settlement with respect to such claims, including any reduction in the hire rate under either time charter.) For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Partnership received indemnification payments of $0.3 million from Höegh LNG. Indemnification payments were recorded as contributions to equity. Refer to note 18.

v3.20.1
Supplemental cash flow information
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Supplemental cash flow information  
Supplemental cash flow information

19.   Supplemental cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Non-cash expenditures for vessel and other equipment

 

$

 —

 

(229)

 

$

 —

Non-cash acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

41,362

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Non-cash revolving credit facility draw for the acquisition of non-controlling interest for the remaining 49% interest in the Höegh Grace entities

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

$

41,362

 

Refer to note 3 for Business combinations.

v3.20.1
Long-term debt (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]  
Schedule of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

    

2018

Lampung facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Export credit tranche

 

$

94,210

 

$

109,096

FSRU tranche

 

 

22,812

 

 

26,988

Gallant facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

111,264

Export credit tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

29,333

Grace facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

135,813

Export credit tranche

 

 

 —

 

 

27,750

$385 million facility:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Commercial tranche

 

 

249,635

 

 

 —

Export credit tranche

 

 

51,167

 

 

 —

Revolving credit tranche

 

 

48,300

 

 

 —

Outstanding principal

 

 

466,124

 

 

440,244

Lampung facility unamortized debt issuance cost

 

 

(4,309)

 

 

(5,809)

Gallant facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed

 

 

 —

 

 

215

Grace facility unamortized fair value of debt assumed

 

 

 —

 

 

895

$385 million facility unamortized debt issuance costs

 

 

(4,854)

 

 

 —

Total debt

 

 

456,961

 

 

435,545

Less: Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

(44,660)

 

 

(45,458)

Long-term debt

 

$

412,301

 

$

390,087

 

Schedule of outstanding principal on long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Total

2020

 

$

44,660

2021

 

 

123,557

2022

 

 

25,597

2023

 

 

25,597

2024

 

 

25,597

2025 and thereafter

 

 

221,116

Total

 

$

466,124

 

v3.20.1
Investments in joint ventures (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Schedule of Investment method

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Accumulated earnings of joint ventures

 

$

3,270

 

$

 —

Accumulated losses of joint ventures

 

$

 —

 

$

(2,808)

 

SRV Joint Gas Ltd and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd  
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Schedule of Financial information

The Partnership has a 50% interest in each of SRV Joint Gas Ltd. (owner of the Neptune) and SRV Joint Gas Two Ltd. (owner of the Cape Ann). The following table presents the summarized financial information of the joint ventures on a 100% combined basis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

Time charter revenues

 

$

77,051

 

79,654

 

$

84,330

 

Accrual historical boil-off claim (note 18)

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(23,700)

 

Other income

 

 

7,814

 

6,684

 

 

 —

 

Total revenues

 

 

84,865

 

86,338

 

 

60,630

 

Operating expenses

 

 

(18,088)

 

(21,864)

 

 

(17,256)

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(20,524)

 

(20,065)

 

 

(20,244)

 

Impairment of long-lived assets (1)

 

 

(149)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Operating income

 

 

46,104

 

44,409

 

 

23,130

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments

 

 

(10,418)

 

16,992

 

 

14,388

 

Other financial expense, net

 

 

(24,144)

 

(26,140)

 

 

(27,854)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

11,542

 

35,261

 

$

9,664

 

Share of joint ventures owned

 

 

50

%

50

%

 

50

%

Share of joint ventures net income (loss) before eliminations

 

 

5,771

 

17,631

 

 

4,832

 

Eliminations

 

 

307

 

307

 

 

307

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

$

6,078

 

17,938

 

$

5,139

 


(1)

At the completion of the class renewal survey of the Neptune, certain equipment was identified that was impaired.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

    

December 31,

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

2019

 

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

17,897

 

$

7,958

 

Restricted cash

 

 

9,250

 

 

13,844

 

Other current assets

 

 

973

 

 

1,894

 

Total current assets

 

 

28,120

 

 

23,696

 

Restricted cash

 

 

34,650

 

 

25,448

 

Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation

 

 

521,060

 

 

539,324

 

Deferred charges

 

 

 —

 

 

194

 

Total long-term assets

 

 

555,710

 

 

564,966

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

 

28,297

 

 

26,599

 

Amounts and loans due to owners and affiliates

 

 

629

 

 

1,215

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

13,089

 

 

10,178

 

Refund liabilities

 

 

26,691

 

 

26,055

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

10,327

 

 

8,924

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

79,033

 

 

72,971

 

Long-term debt

 

 

375,091

 

 

403,052

 

Loans due to owners and affiliates

 

 

7,663

 

 

7,071

 

Derivative instruments

 

 

59,070

 

 

51,563

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

40,952

 

 

43,526

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

482,776

 

 

505,212

 

Net assets (liabilities)

 

$

22,021

 

$

10,479

 

Share of joint ventures owned

 

 

50

%

 

50

%

Share of joint ventures net assets (liabilities) before eliminations

 

 

11,011

 

 

5,240

 

Eliminations

 

 

(7,741)

 

 

(8,048)

 

Accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

$

3,270

 

$

(2,808)

 

 

v3.20.1
Earning per unit and cash distributions - Calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit (Details) - USD ($)
$ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Earnings Per Share, Basic, by Common Class, Including Two Class Method [Line Items]      
Net income $ 52,741 $ 77,622 $ 59,190
Adjustment for:      
Non-controlling interest 0 0 10,408
Preferred unitholders' interest in net income 13,850 12,303 2,480
Limited partners' interest in net income 38,891 65,319 46,302
Less: Dividends paid or to be paid (60,149) (59,952) (57,764)
Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:      
Distributed Earnings (21,258) 5,367 (11,462)
Common units public [Member]      
Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:      
Distributed Earnings $ (11,514) $ 2,900 $ (6,145)
Basic weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Basic 17,986 17,856 17,645
Diluted weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Diluted 17,995 17,864 17,657
Basic and diluted earnings per unit :      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 1.12 $ 1.93 $ 1.37
Common Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:      
Distributed Earnings $ (3,211) $ 340 $ (736)
Basic weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Basic 7,039 2,101 2,116
Diluted weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Diluted 7,039 2,101 2,116
Basic and diluted earnings per unit :      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 1.84 $ 2.03 $ 1.44
Subordinated Units Hoegh LNG [Member]      
Under (over) distributed earnings attributable to:      
Distributed Earnings $ (6,533) $ 2,127 $ (4,581)
Basic weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Basic 8,218 13,156 13,156
Diluted weighted average units outstanding      
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding, Diluted 8,218 13,156 13,156
Basic and diluted earnings per unit :      
Earnings Per Share, Basic and Diluted $ 0.70 $ 2.03 $ 1.45
v3.20.1
Business combinations - Additional information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 01, 2017
Jan. 03, 2017
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Jan. 31, 2017
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Revenue of Acquiree since Acquisition Date, Actual     $ 51,800    
Business Combination, Pro Forma Information, Earnings or Loss of Acquiree since Acquisition Date, Actual     23,600    
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross     45,300    
Business Combination, Consideration Transferred     86,662    
Working Capital Adjustment     800    
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Business Combination, Consideration Transferred, Liabilities Incurred $ 41,400        
Series A Preferred Stock [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross     45,300    
SPEC [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Other Intangible Assets, Net     11,800    
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Lease Initial Term       20 years  
Lease Expiration Term       10 years  
Non Cancellable Lease Expiration Term       10 years  
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd | Maximum [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Lease Expiration Term       15 years  
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd | Minimum [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Lease Expiration Term       10 years  
Hoegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Percentage of Partnership Interest   51.00%      
Deferred Tax Assets, Net of Valuation Allowance     $ 100    
Hoegh Grace entities [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired 49.00% 51.00% 49.00%   51.00%
Lease Initial Term       20 years  
Percentage of Partnership Interest   51.00%      
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Noncontrolling Owners 49.00% 49.00%      
Business Combination, Consideration Transferred     $ 85,900    
Non Cancellable Lease Expiration Term       10 years  
Hoegh Grace entities [Member] | Maximum [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Lease Expiration Term     15 years    
Hoegh Grace entities [Member] | Minimum [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Lease Expiration Term     10 years    
Hoegh Grace Entities and Hoegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd [Member]          
Purchase Price Consideration [Line Items]          
Business Combination, Recognized Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed, Current Liabilities, Long-term Debt   $ 400      
Payments to Acquire Businesses, Gross   $ 91,800      
v3.20.1
Accrued liabilities and other payables (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Accrued liabilities and other payables    
Accrued administrative expenses $ 3,314 $ 3,004
Accrued operating expense 3,033  
Accrued interest 2,850  
Current tax payable 818 1,375
Refund liabilities (note 5) 125 1,834
Current portion of advance for refundable value added tax   429
Lease liability (note 2 and note 11) 75  
Other accruals and payables 949 816
Total accrued liabilities and other payables $ 11,164 $ 7,458
v3.20.1
Related party transactions - Revolving credit facility (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Related party transactions    
Revolving credit facility $ 8,792 $ 39,292
v3.20.1
Schedule I - CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Current assets        
Cash and cash equivalents $ 39,126 $ 26,326 $ 22,679 $ 18,915
Prepaid expenses and other receivables 2,534 2,967    
Total current assets 59,771 46,865    
Long-term assets        
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 3,270 0    
Total long-term assets 953,029 976,175    
Total assets 1,012,800 1,023,040    
Current liabilities        
Current portion of long-term debt 44,660 45,458    
Trade payables 533 529    
Amounts due to owners and affiliates 2,513 2,301    
Derivative instruments 2,907 259    
Accrued liabilities and other payables 11,164 7,458    
Total current liabilities 63,253 57,180    
Long-term liabilities        
Accumulated losses of joint ventures 0 2,808    
Long-term debt 412,301 390,087    
Loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates 8,792 39,292    
Derivative instruments 12,028 2,438    
Total long-term liabilities 448,037 445,423    
Total liabilities 511,290 502,603    
Total equity 501,510 520,437 $ 474,659 $ 364,790
Total liabilities and equity 1,012,800 1,023,040    
Parent Company | Reportable Legal Entities        
Current assets        
Cash and cash equivalents 6,934 7,006    
Current portion of net investment in direct financing lease 25,597 0    
Promissory note from subsidiaries 123,248 123,248    
Prepaid expenses and other receivables 224 14    
Total current assets 156,003 130,268    
Long-term assets        
Accumulated earnings of joint ventures 3,270 0    
Loans to subsidiaries 260,636 0    
Investments in subsidiaries 449,570 433,088    
Total long-term assets 713,476 433,088    
Total assets 869,479 563,356    
Current liabilities        
Current portion of long-term debt 25,597 0    
Trade payables 52 56    
Amounts due to owners and affiliates 398 417    
Derivative instruments 1,821 0    
Accrued liabilities and other payables 3,155 346    
Total current liabilities 31,023 819    
Long-term liabilities        
Accumulated losses of joint ventures 0 2,808    
Long-term debt 318,650 0    
Loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates 8,792 39,292    
Derivative instruments 9,504 0    
Total long-term liabilities 336,946 42,100    
Total liabilities 367,969 42,919    
Total equity 501,510 520,437    
Total liabilities and equity $ 869,479 $ 563,356    
v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances - Disaggregated revenue (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Lease revenues, excluding amortization $ 88,889 $ 89,215  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization 60,063 59,368  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles (3,631) (3,631) $ (3,631)
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock 0 0  
Other revenue 115 1,609 0
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531
Majority Held FSRUs      
Lease revenues, excluding amortization 88,889 89,215  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization 60,063 59,368  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles (3,631) (3,631)  
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock 0 0  
Other revenue 115 1,609  
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531
Joint Venture FSRUs      
Lease revenues, excluding amortization 25,690 25,690  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization 14,095 15,078  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles 0 0  
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock 2,648 2,401  
Other revenue 0 0  
Total revenues 42,433 43,169 30,315
Other      
Lease revenues, excluding amortization 0 0  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization 0 0  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles 0 0  
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock 0 0  
Other revenue 0 0  
Total revenues 0 0 0
Total Segment reporting      
Lease revenues, excluding amortization 114,579 114,905  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization 74,158 74,446  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles (3,631) (3,631)  
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock 2,648 2,401  
Other revenue 115 1,609  
Total revenues 187,869 189,730 173,846
Eliminations      
Lease revenues, excluding amortization (25,690) (25,690)  
Time charter service revenues, excluding amortization (14,095) (15,078)  
Amortization of above market contract intangibles 0 0  
Amortization of deferred revenue for modifications & drydock (2,648) (2,401)  
Other revenue 0 0  
Total revenues $ (42,433) $ (43,169) $ 0
v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and related contract balances - Direct financing lease receivable and unguaranteed residual value (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Financing lease    
Minimum lease payments $ 589,074 $ 589,074
Unguaranteed residual value 146,000 146,000
Unearned income (440,345) (440,345)
Initial direct cost, net 3,095 3,095
Net investment in financing lease at origination 297,824 297,824
Principal repayment and amortization (18,920) (14,751)
Net investment in financing lease at period end 278,904 283,073
Less: Current portion (4,551) (4,168)
Long term net investment in financing lease 274,353 278,905
Net investment in financing lease consists of:    
Financing lease receivable 240,000 247,488
Discounted unguaranteed residual value 38,904 35,585
Net investment in financing lease at period end $ 278,904 $ 283,073
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Interest rate swap agreements (Details)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
USD ($)
2.941 % Interest Rate [Member]  
Derivative [Line Items]  
Derivative, Interest rate index LIBOR
Derivative, Notional Amount $ 61,478
Derivative Liability, Fair Value carrying amount assets $ (3,241)
Derivative, Term Jan 2026
Derivative, Fixed interest rate 2.941%
2.838 % Interest Rate [Member]  
Derivative [Line Items]  
Derivative, Interest rate index LIBOR
Derivative, Notional Amount $ 61,478
Derivative Liability, Fair Value carrying amount assets $ (2,909)
Derivative, Term Oct 2025
Derivative, Fixed interest rate 2.838%
2.735 % Interest Rate [Member]  
Derivative [Line Items]  
Derivative, Interest rate index LIBOR
Derivative, Notional Amount $ 61,478
Derivative Liability, Fair Value carrying amount assets $ (2,699)
Derivative, Term Jan 2026
Derivative, Fixed interest rate 2.735%
2.650 % Interest Rate [Member]  
Derivative [Line Items]  
Derivative, Interest rate index LIBOR
Derivative, Notional Amount $ 61,478
Derivative Liability, Fair Value carrying amount assets $ (2,476)
Derivative, Term Jan 2026
Derivative, Fixed interest rate 2.65%
Lampung [Member]  
Derivative [Line Items]  
Derivative, Interest rate index LIBOR
Derivative, Notional Amount $ 117,022
Derivative Liability, Fair Value carrying amount assets $ (3,610)
Derivative, Term Sep 2026
Derivative, Fixed interest rate 2.80%
v3.20.1
Common, subordinated and preferred units (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Common, subordinated and preferred units  
Schedule of movements in the number of units, subordinated units and preferred units

The following table shows the movements in the number of common units, subordinated units and preferred units during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

 

 

8.75%

 

 

Common

 

Units

 

 

 

Series A

 

 

Units

 

Höegh

 

Subordinated

 

Preferred

(in units)

    

Public

    

LNG

    

Units

    

Units

December 31, 2016

 

17,639,039

 

2,116,060

 

13,156,060

 

 —

May 22, 2017; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

9,805

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

October 5, 2017; Series A preferred units offering

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

4,600,000

December 31, 2017

 

17,648,844

 

2,116,060

 

13,156,060

 

4,600,000

June 6, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

8,840

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

July 5, 2018; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

2,210

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

Units issued to staff at Höegh LNG during 2018

 

14,622

 

(14,622)

 

 —

 

 —

Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2018

 

17,079

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

ATM program (from January 26, 2018 to December 31, 2018)

 

253,106

 

 —

 

 —

 

1,529,070

December 31, 2018

 

17,944,701

 

2,101,438

 

13,156,060

 

6,129,070

June 4, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

8,944

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

July 16, 2019; Awards to non-employee directors as compensation for directors' fees

 

2,236

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

August 16, 2019; Subordinated units converted to common units

 

 —

 

13,156,060

 

(13,156,060)

 

 —

Phantom units issued to CEO/CFO during 2019

 

19,745

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

ATM program (from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019)

 

53,160

 

 —

 

 —

 

496,520

December 31, 2019

 

18,028,786

 

15,257,498

 

 —

 

6,625,590

 

v3.20.1
Significant accounting policies (Details)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Above Market Leases [Member] | Hoegh Gallant [Member]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life 3 years 4 months 24 days
Above Market Leases [Member] | Hoegh Grace entities [Member]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life 9 years 6 months
Option for time charter extension [Member] | Hoegh Gallant [Member]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]  
Finite-Lived Intangible Asset, Useful Life 5 years 3 months 18 days
v3.20.1
Long-term debt (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal $ 466,124 $ 440,244
Total debt 456,961 435,545
Less: Current portion of long-term debt (44,660) (45,458)
Long-term debt 412,301 390,087
Lampung Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Unamortized debt issuance costs (4,309) (5,809)
Total debt 112,713 130,275
Gallant facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Unamortized fair value of debt assumed 0 215
Total debt 0 140,812
Grace facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Unamortized fair value of debt assumed 0 895
Total debt 0 164,458
$385 Million Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Unamortized debt issuance costs (4,854) 0
Export Credit Tranche [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 94,210 109,096
Export Credit Tranche [Member] | Gallant facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 0 29,333
Export Credit Tranche [Member] | Grace facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 0 27,750
Export Credit Tranche [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 51,167 0
FSRU tranche [Member] | Lampung Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 22,812 26,988
Commercial tranche [Member] | Gallant facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 0 111,264
Commercial tranche [Member] | Grace facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 0 135,813
Commercial tranche [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal 249,635 0
Revolving Credit Facility [Member] | $385 Million Facility [Member]    
Debt Instrument [Line Items]    
Outstanding principal $ 48,300 $ 0
v3.20.1
Prepaid expenses and other receivables (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Prepaid expenses and other receivables    
Refundable value added tax on import   $ 2,517
Prepaid expenses and other receivables $ 2,534 450
Total other prepaid expenses and other receivables $ 2,534 $ 2,967
v3.20.1
Income tax - Reconciliation of the income before tax at the statutory rate (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Income tax      
Income before tax $ 60,016 $ 85,927 $ 63,068
At applicable statutory tax rate      
Amount computed at corporate tax of 0% 0 0 0
Foreign tax rate differences 5,425 7,513 7,119
Permanent differences:      
Amended tax return: reinstatement of tax loss carryforward 0 0 (1,486)
Tax audit or amended tax return: change in uncertain tax position 558 (41) (2,228)
Non-deductible interest expense 1,477 875 752
Non-deductible withholding tax 717 838 686
Non-deductible loss on derivatives 120 0 0
Tax exemptions (13) (36) (42)
Non-deductible other financial items 194 116 81
Other non-deductible costs 45 63 59
Tax credits (1,252) (1,032) (1,031)
Adjustment for valuation allowance 4 9 (32)
Tax expense (benefit) for year $ 7,275 $ 8,305 $ 3,878
v3.20.1
Supplemental cash flow information - Additional Information (Details) - Hoegh Grace
Dec. 31, 2017
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired 49.00%
Revolving Credit Facility [Member]  
Business Acquisition, Percentage of Voting Interests Acquired 49.00%
v3.20.1
Vessels and other equipment (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Beginning Balance, Historical Cost $ 713,382 $ 713,125
Additions 3,290 257
Ending Balance, Historical Cost 716,672 713,382
Depreciation for the year (21,170) (20,987)
Accumulated depreciation (76,241) (55,071)
Vessel, net 640,431 658,311
Vessel [Member]    
Beginning Balance, Historical Cost 706,715 706,458
Additions 183 257
Ending Balance, Historical Cost 706,898 706,715
Depreciation for the year (19,393) (19,387)
Accumulated depreciation (70,264) (50,871)
Vessel, net 636,634 655,844
Dry Docking [Member]    
Beginning Balance, Historical Cost 6,667 6,667
Additions 3,107 0
Ending Balance, Historical Cost 9,774 6,667
Depreciation for the year (1,777) (1,600)
Accumulated depreciation (5,977) (4,200)
Vessel, net $ 3,797 $ 2,467
v3.20.1
Investments in joint ventures - Joint ventures on aggregated basis (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Dec. 31, 2016
Time charter revenues $ 145,321 $ 144,952 $ 143,531  
Accrual historical boil-off claim (note 18)     0  
Other income 115 1,609 0  
Total revenues 145,436 146,561 143,531  
Operating expenses (40,731) (33,111) (33,701)  
Depreciation and amortization (21,477) (21,146) (21,054)  
Impairment of long-lived assets 0      
Operating income 89,306 110,242 93,764  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments 0 4,681 2,463  
Net income (loss) 52,741 77,622 59,190  
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 5,139  
Cash and cash equivalents 39,126 26,326 22,679 $ 18,915
Restricted cash 8,066 6,003 6,962 8,055
Total current assets 59,771 46,865    
Restricted cash 12,627 13,125 13,640 $ 14,154
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 640,431 658,311    
Total long-term assets 953,029 976,175    
Current portion of long-term debt 44,660 45,458    
Derivative instruments 2,907 259    
Refund liabilities 125 1,834    
Total current liabilities 63,253 57,180    
Long-term debt 412,301 390,087    
Derivative instruments 12,028 2,438    
Other long-term liabilities 84 99    
Total long-term liabilities 448,037 445,423    
Srv Joint Gas Limited And Srv Joint Gas Two Limited        
Time charter revenues 77,051 79,654 84,330  
Accrual historical boil-off claim (note 18)     (23,700)  
Other income 7,814 6,684    
Total revenues 84,865 86,338 60,630  
Operating expenses (18,088) (21,864) (17,256)  
Depreciation and amortization (20,524) (20,065) (20,244)  
Impairment of long-lived assets (149)      
Operating income 46,104 44,409 23,130  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments (10,418) 16,992 14,388  
Other financial expense, net (24,144) (26,140) (27,854)  
Net income (loss) $ 11,542 $ 35,261 $ 9,664  
Share of joint ventures owned 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%  
Share of joint ventures net income (loss) before eliminations $ 5,771 $ 17,631 $ 4,832  
Eliminations 307 307 307  
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures 6,078 17,938 $ 5,139  
Cash and cash equivalents 17,897 7,958    
Restricted cash 9,250 13,844    
Other current assets 973 1,894    
Total current assets 28,120 23,696    
Restricted cash 34,650 25,448    
Vessels, net of accumulated depreciation 521,060 539,324    
Deferred charges   194    
Total long-term assets 555,710 564,966    
Current portion of long-term debt 28,297 26,599    
Amounts and loans due to owners and affiliates 629 1,215    
Derivative instruments 13,089 10,178    
Refund liabilities 26,691 26,055    
Other current liabilities 10,327 8,924    
Total current liabilities 79,033 72,971    
Long-term debt 375,091 403,052    
Loans due to owners and affiliates 7,663 7,071    
Derivative instruments 59,070 51,563    
Other long-term liabilities 40,952 43,526    
Total long-term liabilities 482,776 505,212    
Net assets (liabilities) $ 22,021 $ 10,479    
Share of joint ventures owned 50.00% 50.00% 50.00%  
Share of joint ventures net liabilities before eliminations $ 11,011 $ 5,240    
Eliminations (7,741) (8,048)    
Accumulated earnings (losses) of joint ventures $ 3,270 $ (2,808)    
v3.20.1
Time charter revenues and net investment in direct financing lease - Additional Information (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Hoegh LNG FRSU III Ltd    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Business Combinations Charter Out One Vessel to Predefined Hire Rate 90.00%  
Hoegh Gallant [Member]    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Expiration Year 2020  
Lease Expiration Term 5 years  
PGN FSRU Lampung    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Expiration Year 2034  
Lease Expiration Term 20 years  
Hoegh Grace    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Expiration Year 2036  
Lease Expiration Term 20 years  
Non Cancellable Lease Expiration Term 10 years  
Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Initial Term 20 years  
Maximum [Member] | Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Expiration Term 15 years  
Minimum [Member] | Hoegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Lease Expiration Term 10 years  
Time Charter Services    
Capital Leased Assets [Line Items]    
Reduction for revenue recognized from previous years $ 497 $ 2,772
Repayments of refund liabilities to charterer $ 1,188 $ 3,328
v3.20.1
Risk management and concentrations of risk - Effect of cash flow hedge accounting on accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) and earnings (Details) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Dec. 31, 2018
Dec. 31, 2017
Beginning Balance, Before tax gains (losses) $ (5,902) $ (3,612) $ (6,947)
Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach, Before tax gains (losses) (625)    
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge, Before tax gains (losses) (13,535) 412 2,480
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings, Before tax gains (losses) 956 855 855
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach, Before tax gains (losses) 987 (3,557)  
Other comprehensive income for period, Before tax gains (losses) (12,217) (2,290) 3,335
Ending Balance, Before tax gains (losses) (18,119) (5,902) (3,612)
Beginning Balance, Tax benefit (expense) 565 864 1,211
Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach, Tax benefit (expense) 0    
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge, Tax benefit (expense) 0    
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings, Tax benefit (expense) 0 (299) (347)
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach, Tax benefit (expense) (389)    
Other comprehensive income for period, Tax benefit (expense) (389) (299) (347)
Ending Balance, Tax benefit (expense) 176 565 864
Beginning Balance, Net of tax (5,337) (2,748) (5,736)
Initial value of interest rate swap to be recognized in earnings on amortization approach, Net of tax (625)    
Effective portion of unrealized loss on cash flow hedge, Net of tax (13,535) 412 2,480
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings, Net of tax 956 556 508
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach, Net of tax 598 (3,557)  
Other comprehensive income for period, Net of tax (12,606) (2,589) 2,988
Ending Balance, Net of tax (17,943) $ (5,337) $ (2,748)
Gain (loss) reclassified to earnings, tax 389    
Interest Expense [Member]      
Reclassification of amortization of cash flow hedge to earnings, Before tax gains (losses) (956)    
Reclassification discontinued hedge and initial fair value from accumulated other comprehensive income based on amortization approach, Before tax gains (losses) (987)    
Gain (loss) reclassified to earnings $ (1,943)    
v3.20.1
Business combinations
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Business combinations  
Business combinations

3.   Business combinations

Höegh Grace

Acquisition of 51% ownership interest in Höegh Grace

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 51% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., the owner of the entities that own and operate Höegh Grace pursuant to a purchase, sale and contribution agreement that the Partnership entered into with Höegh LNG on December 1, 2016. The cash consideration was $91.8 million, excluding the working capital adjustment. The working capital adjustment was $0.4 million.

In December 2016, the Höegh Grace, commenced on the time charter contract with a lease element and a services element with SPEC. The Höegh Grace serves as an LNG import terminal in Cartagena, on the Atlantic coast of Colombia. The initial term of the lease is 20 years. However, the charterer has an unconditional option to cancel the lease after 10 and 15 years. As a result, the non-cancellable lease period is for 10 years.

Under terms of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd.’s memorandum and articles of association, the Partnership has the power to make key operating decisions considered to be most significant to the Höegh Grace entities and, therefore, has control over the Höegh Grace entities through the Partnership’s ownership of the equity interest of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. As a result, the Partnership accounted for the acquisition of the 51% interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. as a business combination. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership entered an agreement with Höegh LNG, under which Höegh LNG granted to the Partnership the authority to make decisions over the operations of Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd. from January 1, 2017 to the closing date of the acquisition. As a result, the Partnership recorded the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities in its consolidated income statement as of January 1, 2017.

The purchase price of the acquisition was allocated to the identifiable fair values allocated to each class of identifiable assets acquired.

Under the purchase method of accounting when control is obtained, the non-controlling interest is required to be measured at its fair value at the acquisition date. Management concluded that the pro-rata values of the controlling and non-controlling interests were the same. The fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the 49% interest of the non-controlling interest was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date with any remaining unallocated amount recognized as goodwill.

The following summarizes the fair values of assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

    

  

    

  

 

Consideration

 

 

  

 

  

 

Use of proceeds from public offering (issuance of 6,588,389 common units to the public)

 

$

91,768

 

  

 

Working capital adjustment

 

 

407

 

 

  

Total consideration

 

 

  

 

$

92,175

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Assets acquired

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

3,774

 

 

  

Restricted cash

 

 

19

 

 

  

Trade receivables

 

 

4,446

 

 

  

Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

 

51

 

 

  

Vessel

 

 

357,138

 

 

  

Other equipment

 

 

30

 

 

  

Intangibles: Above market time charter

 

 

11,760

 

 

  

Other long term assets

 

 

830

 

 

  

Total assets

 

 

  

 

 

378,048

Liabilities assumed

 

 

  

 

 

  

Trade payables

 

 

(193)

 

 

  

Amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 

(622)

 

 

  

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

(1,569)

 

 

  

Total long term debt

 

 

(192,286)

 

 

  

Derivative instruments

 

 

(2,642)

 

 

  

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

  

 

 

(197,312)

Total identifiable net assets

 

 

  

 

 

180,736

Non-controlling interest in total identifiable net assets

 

 

  

 

 

88,561

Acquired share in total identifiable net asset

 

 

  

 

$

92,175

 

One contract related intangible was identified. The Partnership recorded $11.8 million for the favorable time charter contract with SPEC. Refer to note 2 Significant accounting policies: Intangibles and goodwill for information on the useful life and timing of amortization of the intangibles and note 12 for additional information.

The premium arising in a business combination for the difference in the fair value of the debt assumed compared to the outstanding principal was reported in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct adjustment to the outstanding principal of the related debt and amortized on an effective interest rate method over the term of the relevant loan. Amortization of fair value of the debt assumed was included as a component of interest expense.

The fair value of assets acquired and the liabilities assumed approximated the total consideration, therefore, no residual amount has been recognized as goodwill for the acquisition.

All of the excess value associated with the business combination is associated with assets and liabilities of Höegh LNG FSRU IV Ltd., a Cayman Islands company, which is not subject to corporate income taxes. Therefore, there are no deferred tax assets or liabilities included in the purchase price allocation. As of the acquisition date, Höegh LNG Colombia S.A.S. had net deferred tax assets of less than $0.1 million which were fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Acquisition of remaining 49% ownership interest in Höegh Grace

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in Höegh LNG Colombia Holding Ltd., and, as of that date, the Partnership has a 100% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and there was no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

The purchase price for the acquisition was $85.9 million, excluding the working capital adjustment, pursuant to the purchase, sale and contribution agreement. The working capital adjustment was $0.8 million. The purchase price was settled with cash of $45.3 million from the issuance of the Series A preferred units and the rest of the purchase price of $41.4 million was financed by draws on the revolving credit facility.

The acquisition of 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities in January 2017 was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The December 2017 acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities is a change in the Partnership’s ownership and has been accounted for as an equity transaction for the acquisition of the 49% interest from the owner of the non-controlling interest. The carrying amount of the non-controlling interest is adjusted to reflect the change in ownership interest. Any difference between the fair value of the total consideration and the book value of the non-controlling interest was recognized as a capital contribution in equity attributable to the Partnership.

The following summarizes the acquisition of the non-controlling interest as of the acquisition date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

 

 

    

 

 

Consideration

  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash portion of purchase price

 

$

45,300

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility draw

 

 

40,600

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility draw for working capital adjustment

 

 

762

 

 

 

Total consideration

 

 

 

 

$

86,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49% Assets acquired

 

 

 

 

 

181,420

49% Liabilities assumed

 

 

 

 

 

(91,522)

Total identifiable net assets

 

 

 

 

 

89,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interest acquired

 

 

 

 

 

89,898

Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid

 

 

 

 

 

(3,236)

Impact of acquisition of non-controlling interest on equity

 

 

 

 

$

86,662

 

Revenue and profit contributions

Total revenues of $51.8 million and net income of $23.6 million have been included in the Partnership’s consolidated statement of income from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

 

v3.20.1
Income tax
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Income tax  
Income tax

7.   Income tax

The components of income tax expense recognized in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Current tax (benefit) expense

 

$

4,126

 

4,759

 

$

35

Deferred tax (benefit) expense for

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Change in temporary differences

 

 

3,341

 

3,290

 

 

4,189

Tax loss and tax credit carried forward

 

 

(196)

 

247

 

 

(314)

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

 4

 

 9

 

 

(32)

Total deferred tax (benefit) expense

 

 

3,149

 

3,546

 

 

3,843

Total income tax (benefit) expense

 

$

7,275

 

8,305

 

$

3,878

 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Cash flow hedge derivative instruments

 

$

389

 

299

 

$

347

Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognized in OCI

 

$

389

 

299

 

$

347

 

The reconciliation of the income before tax at the statutory rate in the Marshall Islands to the actual income tax expense for each year is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Income before tax

 

$

60,016

 

85,927

 

$

63,068

At applicable statutory tax rate

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amount computed at corporate tax of 0 %

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

Foreign tax rate differences

 

 

5,425

 

7,513

 

 

7,119

Permanent differences:

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Amended tax return: reinstatement of tax loss carryforward

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(1,486)

Tax audit or amended tax return: change in uncertain tax position

 

 

558

 

(41)

 

 

(2,228)

Non-deductible interest expense

 

 

1,477

 

875

 

 

752

Non-deductible withholding tax

 

 

717

 

838

 

 

686

Non-deductible loss on derivatives

 

 

120

 

 —

 

 

 —

Tax exemptions

 

 

(13)

 

(36)

 

 

(42)

Non-deductible other financial items

 

 

194

 

116

 

 

81

Other non-deductible costs

 

 

45

 

63

 

 

59

Tax credits

 

 

(1,252)

 

(1,032)

 

 

(1,031)

Adjustment for valuation allowance

 

 

 4

 

 9

 

 

(32)

Tax expense (benefit) for year

 

$

7,275

 

8,305

 

$

3,878

 

Deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

As of

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

$

235

 

$

196

Derivative instruments

 

 

565

 

 

954

Other equipment

 

 

 9

 

 

 9

Tax credits carried forward

 

 

1,818

 

 

1,626

Tax loss carryforward

 

 

57

 

 

53

Valuation allowance

 

 

(57)

 

 

(53)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

  

 

 

  

Accrued interest income

 

 

(4,123)

 

 

(3,837)

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

(385)

 

 

(154)

Financing lease

 

 

(10,451)

 

 

(7,594)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net

 

$

(12,332)

 

$

(8,800)

 

The Partnership is not subject to Marshall Islands corporate income taxes. The Partnership is subject to tax for earnings of its subsidiaries incorporated in Singapore, Indonesia, Cyprus, and the UK and for certain Colombian source income. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the tax expense principally related to subsidiaries in Indonesia, Singapore and Colombia. The Singapore subsidiary’s taxable income mainly arises from internal interest income. The charterer in Colombia pays certain taxes directly to the Colombian tax authorities on behalf of the Partnership’s subsidiaries that own and operate the Höegh Grace. The tax payments are a mechanism for advance collection of part of the income taxes for the Colombian subsidiary and a final income tax on Colombian source income for the non-Colombian subsidiary. The Partnership concluded these third-party payments to the tax authorities represent income taxes that must be accounted for under the guidance for income taxes. The amount of non-cash income tax expense was $867, $852 and $861 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, tax benefits were recorded of $1,486 and $2,228 for the reinstatement of the tax loss carryforward and the reversal of an uncertain tax position, respectively, due to the amendment of the 2016 tax return of the Indonesian subsidiary. The amendment was a result of a reevaluation of the application of the infrastructure industry exemption to regulations introduced in 2016 placing limitations on interest expense deductions. The infrastructure exemption was also applied by the Indonesian subsidiary for the reported income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

In December of 2018, the Indonesian tax authorities concluded an audit of corporate income tax filings for the Indonesian subsidiary for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014. The outcome of the audit reduced the historical tax loss carryforward, mainly due to disallowed expenses, resulting in a settlement of $885 with respect to the unrecognized tax benefits originating in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2018, tax benefits of $434 were recorded reflecting a reduction to the uncertain tax position originating in 2013 based on the audit’s conclusion. In addition, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $418 for a tax position taken in the 2018 tax return which was not more-likely-than-not to be sustained.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, there was an increase to the uncertain tax position of $558 for a tax position to be taken in the 2019 tax return which is not more-likely-than-not to be sustained. As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized tax benefits were $2,283.

Benefits of uncertain tax positions are recognized when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. Changes in the unrecognized tax benefits is summarized below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Year ended

 

 

December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1,

 

$

(1,725)

 

(2,626)

 

$

(398)

Increase related to prior year tax positions

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(2,228)

Decrease related to prior year tax positions

 

 

 —

 

434

 

 

 —

Increase related to current year tax positions

 

 

(558)

 

(418)

 

 

 —

Settlements

 

 

 —

 

885

 

 

 —

Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31,

 

$

(2,283)

 

(1,725)

 

$

(2,626)

 

Tax loss carryforwards of $455 expire between 2020 and 2023. Tax credits carried forward of $566 and $1,003 expire in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The tax returns of Singapore and Indonesia are subject to examination for four years and five years, respectively, from the year of filing. For Colombia, tax returns are subject to examination for three years from the due date of the return. The tax returns from the years 2015 and subsequent years remain subject to review for Indonesia and Singapore. For Colombia, tax returns from the years 2017 and subsequent years remain subject to review. Refer to note 18.

v3.20.1
Vessels and other equipment
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Vessels and other equipment  
Vessels and other equipment

11.   Vessels and other equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Dry-

    

  

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

Vessel

    

docking

    

Total

Historical cost December 31, 2017

 

$

706,458

 

6,667

 

$

713,125

Additions

 

 

257

 

 —

 

 

257

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

706,715

 

6,667

 

 

713,382

Depreciation for the year

 

 

(19,387)

 

(1,600)

 

 

(20,987)

Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2018

 

 

(50,871)

 

(4,200)

 

 

(55,071)

Vessels, net December 31, 2018

 

 

655,844

 

2,467

 

 

658,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Historical cost December 31, 2018

 

 

706,715

 

6,667

 

 

713,382

Additions

 

 

183

 

3,107

 

 

3,290

Historical cost December 31, 2019

 

 

706,898

 

9,774

 

 

716,672

Depreciation for the year

 

 

(19,393)

 

(1,777)

 

 

(21,170)

Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2019

 

 

(70,264)

 

(5,977)

 

 

(76,241)

Vessels, net December 31, 2019

 

$

636,634

 

3,797

 

$

640,431

 

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, other equipment consists principally of warehouse, office equipment and computers. As of January 1, 2019, other equipment includes a right-of-use asset due to the adoption of the revised guidance for leases. Refer to note 2. Adoption of the new leasing standard resulted in recording a right-of-use assets and lease liability for operating leases of $0.15 million and $0.15 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. Other equipment of $845 and $817 is recorded net of accumulated depreciation of $679 and $372 in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the right-of-use assets and lease liability for operating leases was $91. Depreciation expense for other equipment was $307,  $159 and $79 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

v3.20.1
Business combinations (Tables) - Hoegh Grace
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Schedule of fair values of assets and liabilities

The following summarizes the fair values of assets and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

 

    

  

    

  

 

Consideration

 

 

  

 

  

 

Use of proceeds from public offering (issuance of 6,588,389 common units to the public)

 

$

91,768

 

  

 

Working capital adjustment

 

 

407

 

 

  

Total consideration

 

 

  

 

$

92,175

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Assets acquired

 

 

  

 

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

3,774

 

 

  

Restricted cash

 

 

19

 

 

  

Trade receivables

 

 

4,446

 

 

  

Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

 

51

 

 

  

Vessel

 

 

357,138

 

 

  

Other equipment

 

 

30

 

 

  

Intangibles: Above market time charter

 

 

11,760

 

 

  

Other long term assets

 

 

830

 

 

  

Total assets

 

 

  

 

 

378,048

Liabilities assumed

 

 

  

 

 

  

Trade payables

 

 

(193)

 

 

  

Amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 

(622)

 

 

  

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

(1,569)

 

 

  

Total long term debt

 

 

(192,286)

 

 

  

Derivative instruments

 

 

(2,642)

 

 

  

Total liabilities assumed

 

 

  

 

 

(197,312)

Total identifiable net assets

 

 

  

 

 

180,736

Non-controlling interest in total identifiable net assets

 

 

  

 

 

88,561

Acquired share in total identifiable net asset

 

 

  

 

$

92,175

 

Schedule of acquisition of the non-controlling interest

The following summarizes the acquisition of the non-controlling interest as of the acquisition date:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

 

 

    

 

 

Consideration

  

 

 

 

 

 

Cash portion of purchase price

 

$

45,300

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility draw

 

 

40,600

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility draw for working capital adjustment

 

 

762

 

 

 

Total consideration

 

 

 

 

$

86,662

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49% Assets acquired

 

 

 

 

 

181,420

49% Liabilities assumed

 

 

 

 

 

(91,522)

Total identifiable net assets

 

 

 

 

 

89,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-controlling interest acquired

 

 

 

 

 

89,898

Difference between net book value of acquired non-controlling interest and consideration paid

 

 

 

 

 

(3,236)

Impact of acquisition of non-controlling interest on equity

 

 

 

 

$

86,662

 

v3.20.1
Schedule I
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Schedule I  
Schedule I

Exhibit 15.1

Schedule I – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Total revenue

 

$

 —

 

 —

 

$

 —

EXPENSES

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Administrative expenses

 

 

(6,473)

 

(5,822)

 

 

(8,608)

Equity in earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

60,315

 

68,359

 

 

66,521

Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures

 

 

6,078

 

17,938

 

 

5,139

Interest income

 

 

11,205

 

93

 

 

83

Interest expense

 

 

(18,242)

 

(2,938)

 

 

(3,934)

Other items, net

 

 

(142)

 

(8)

 

 

(11)

Net income

 

$

52,741

 

77,622

 

$

59,190

Share of subsidiaries unrealized losses on cash flow hedges

 

 

(12,217)

 

(2,290)

 

 

3,335

Share of subsidiaries income tax benefit

 

 

(389)

 

(299)

 

 

(347)

Comprehensive income

 

$

40,135

 

75,033

 

$

62,178

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of  December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

Cash

 

$

6,934

 

$

7,006

Current portion of long-term loans to subsidiaries

 

 

25,597

 

 

 —

Promissory note from subsidiaries

 

 

123,248

 

 

123,248

Prepaid expenses and other receivables

 

 

224

 

 

14

Total current assets

 

 

156,003

 

 

130,268

Accumulated earnings of joint ventures

 

 

3,270

 

 

 —

Loans to subsidiaries

 

 

260,636

 

 

 —

Investments in subsidiaries

 

 

449,570

 

 

433,088

Total long-term assets

 

 

713,476

 

 

433,088

Total assets

 

$

869,479

 

$

563,356

LIABILITIES AND PARTNER’S CAPITAL

 

 

  

 

 

  

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

25,597

 

$

 —

Trade payables

 

 

52

 

 

56

Amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 

398

 

 

417

Derivative instruments

 

 

1,821

 

 

 —

Accrued liabilities and other payables

 

 

3,155

 

 

346

Total current liabilities

 

 

31,023

 

 

819

Accumulated losses of joint ventures

 

 

 —

 

 

2,808

Long-term debt

 

 

318,650

 

 

 —

Loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates

 

 

8,792

 

 

39,292

Derivative instruments

 

 

9,504

 

 

 —

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

336,946

 

 

42,100

Total liabilities

 

 

367,969

 

 

42,919

Total partners’ capital

 

 

501,510

 

 

520,437

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

869,479

 

$

563,356

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

33,130

 

42,401

 

$

6,862

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Long-term loan due from subsidiaries

 

 

(286,233)

 

 —

 

 

 —

Expenditure for purchase of Höegh Grace entities

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

(137,475)

(Increase) decrease in restricted cash designated for purchase of the Höegh Grace entities

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

91,768

Proceeds from investment in subsidiaries

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

12,202

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

(286,233)

 

 —

 

 

(33,505)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

Net proceeds from issuance of Series A Preferred Units

 

 

13,065

 

38,659

 

 

110,924

Net proceeds from issuance of common units

 

 

1,029

 

4,563

 

 

 —

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

 

368,300

 

 —

 

 

 —

Proceeds from loans and promissory notes due to owners and affiliates

 

 

3,500

 

5,400

 

 

25,730

Repayment of long-term debt

 

 

(19,198)

 

 —

 

 

 —

Repayment of debt issuance cost

 

 

(5,797)

 

 —

 

 

 —

Repayment of amounts due to owners and affiliates

 

 

(34,000)

 

(17,500)

 

 

(58,705)

Proceeds from indemnifications received from Höegh LNG

 

 

 —

 

1,701

 

 

2,075

Repayment of indemnifications received from Höegh LNG

 

 

(64)

 

(2,353)

 

 

(1,534)

Cash distributions to limited partners

 

 

(73,804)

 

(72,497)

 

 

(57,037)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

253,031

 

(42,027)

 

 

21,453

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 

 

(72)

 

374

 

 

(5,190)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period

 

 

7,006

 

6,632

 

 

11,822

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period

 

$

6,934

 

7,006

 

$

6,632

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

1. Basis of presentation

Höegh LNG Partners LP – the Parent company is a Marshall Islands limited partnership formed on April 28, 2014.

In the parent-only financial statements, the investment in subsidiaries and investment in joint ventures are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and accumulated earnings in joint ventures since the date of acquisition and the closing of the initial public offering of Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) on August 12, 2014. The Partnership’s share of net income of its unconsolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures is included in the condensed income statement using the equity method. The Parent company’s financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in the Partnership’s Report on Form 20‑F for the year ended December 31, 2019.

2. Dividends

A cash dividend of $42.4 million, $51.7 million and $17.7 million was paid to the Parent company from its consolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.